Chapter Reliability

What is Reliability in Testing?

Reliability means how consistent or stable a test is. If someone takes the same test again and again (at
different times or with similar questions), and gets about the same score each time, the test is reliable.

Why It Matters:
No test is perfect. Scores can change a bit because of random things like mood, distractions, or noise. A
reliable test helps reduce these random changes so we can trust the score more.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

True Score vs. Error:

A test score has two parts:

True score: the real ability or trait being measured.

Error: things that shouldn't affect the score, like being tired or nervous.

For example, if a test is meant to measure mood, daily changes are part of the true score. But if it's
measuring personality (which should stay the same), those daily changes are just errors.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

What is a Correlation Coefficient?

It's a number (usually written as r) that shows the relationship between two sets of scores.

It ranges from -1 to +1:

+1 = perfect positive relationship (high scores in both tests).

-1 = perfect negative relationship (high in one, low in the other).

0 = no relationship at all.

Example:

If someone who scores high in math also scores high in reading, the correlation is positive. If high math
scores go with low reading scores, the correlation is negative.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Test Reliability Types:
1. Test-Retest Reliability:

Give the same test to the same people twice.

If the scores are similar, the test is reliable over time.

Works best if the time between tests is short.

Problems with Test-Retest:

People might remember their answers.

Practice can help some people more than others.

The test might not work the same the second time.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Significance of Correlation:
A high r value means there's a strong connection between scores.

But to say it's truly meaningful (not just by chance), it must be statistically significant.

For small groups, it’s harder to get a significant result.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

In Simple Words:
[A reliable test gives steady results, like a good scale that shows your weight correctly every time. If
results change randomly, the test isn't reliable. We use statistics, like correlation, to check this. The
more reliable a test is, the more we can trust the scores.]

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Alternate-Form Reliability
Alternate-form reliability checks a test’s consistency by using two different but equivalent versions. The
same people take one version on one day and the other version on a different day. If the scores are
similar, it shows that the test is reliable both over time and across different sets of questions. It’s

important that both forms are truly alike in content, difficulty, and instructions. However, practice effects
or slight differences in the questions might still influence the results.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Split-Half Reliability
Split-half reliability involves dividing a single test into two parts—commonly by separating the odd-
numbered questions from the even-numbered ones. If the scores from both halves are similar, the test is
considered internally consistent. Since each half has fewer items, a formula (like the Spearman-Brown
formula) is used to estimate the reliability of the whole test.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Kuder-Richardson Reliability and Coefficient Alpha

These methods measure how well all the test items work together. For tests with right-or-wrong answers,
the Kuder-Richardson formula is used. For tests with more varied scoring, coefficient alpha is the
common method. High consistency among items means the test is reliably measuring the same concept
throughout.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Reliability of Speeded Tests

Speeded tests are timed, and scores often depend on how quickly a person works. In these tests,
traditional methods of checking reliability (like splitting items) can give falsely high reliability if they
only capture speed. Instead, the test can be split into time segments or given as two short, equivalent tests
to better assess reliability by accounting for both speed and accuracy.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

In Simple Words:
each method checks different aspects of how consistent a test is. Whether using different test forms,
dividing a single test, or looking at how well the items agree, the goal is to ensure that the test measures
what it’s supposed to measure without being overly influenced by chance factors or differences in testing
conditions.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Dependence of Reliability on the Sample Tested

A test’s reliability can change depending on who takes it. In a group where everyone has similar abilities,
scores don’t vary much, so the reliability might seem low. In a diverse group with big differences, the
reliability tends to be higher. That’s why a reliability coefficient calculated for one group may not work
for another. It’s best to check reliability with a group that’s similar to the one you plan to test. Sometimes,
test manuals even give separate reliability scores for different subgroups, like different ages or ability
levels.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Standard Error of Measurement (SEM)
The SEM tells us how much an individual’s score might fluctuate because of random factors like
distractions or mood. It is calculated using the test’s standard deviation and its reliability coefficient. For
instance, if a test has a standard deviation of 15 and a reliability of 0.89, the SEM would be about 5
points. This means that roughly 68% of the time, a person’s true score is within 5 points above or below
their observed score. For even higher confidence, a wider range can be calculated. The SEM helps us
understand whether small differences between scores are meaningful or just due to measurement error.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Interpreting Score Differences

When comparing two scores (for example, in different parts of an IQ test), it’s important to consider the
SEM. If the difference between two scores is smaller than what might be expected from measurement
error (like less than 10 points), it might not reflect a true difference in ability. This approach prevents us
from over-interpreting small differences that could simply be due to chance.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////

Reliability of Criterion-Referenced Tests

Criterion-referenced tests measure whether a person has mastered a particular skill. Once mastery is
reached, most scores will be similar, which can make reliability seem low even though the test is
working as intended. Special methods are used for these tests to focus on how well they distinguish
between those who have and have not mastered the skill.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

In Simple Words:
the reliability of a test depends on the diversity of the group taking it, and the SEM gives us a way to
understand how much a score might vary because of random errors. This helps ensure that score
differences are interpreted accurately.
 Chapter Validity
Validity tells us whether a test measures what it is supposed to measure and how well it does that. It
doesn’t come as a single score; instead, it is judged by looking at various types of evidence and must be
considered in light of the test’s specific purpose.

For example:
Content Validity

This asks whether the test covers a complete and representative sample of the subject area. In an
achievement test, experts check if the test items truly reflect the course content and important skills, not
just a few topics.

Criterion-Related Validity

This type compares the test with another measure that is already known to be good. If the test is meant to
predict job performance or school grades, its scores are compared with actual job ratings or grades. When
both are measured at the same time, it is called concurrent validity; if the test predicts future performance,
it is called predictive validity.

Construct Validity

This looks at whether the test truly measures a theoretical trait (like intelligence, anxiety, or creativity). It
is built up from many pieces of evidence showing that the test scores relate in expected ways to other
measures and behaviors.

Face Validity

This is about whether the test appears to measure what it is supposed to at first glance. Although it does
not prove actual validity, a test that “looks right” is more likely to be accepted by test-takers and
administrators.

In Simple Words:
In short, the validity of a test is established by examining its content, how well it predicts or correlates
with other important measures, and whether it fits the theoretical idea it is meant to assess. Validity is
always judged in relation to the specific purpose of the test.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Developmental Changes
Some intelligence tests are validated by checking if scores increase as children get older. For example,
tests like the Stanford-Binet should show higher scores with increasing age since certain abilities develop
over time. However, not all traits (like some personality characteristics) change clearly with age. Also,
these age trends may differ in various cultures.

////////////////////////////////////////////////

Correlations with Other Tests

When a new test is developed, it is often compared with older, similar tests. A moderate, positive
correlation suggests that the new test measures the same general skill. At the same time, the new test
should not correlate too highly with tests that measure unrelated skills—for instance, a mechanical
aptitude test should not be strongly linked to reading ability. This helps ensure the test focuses on the
intended area.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Factor Analysis
Factor analysis is a statistical tool used to see which test items or subtests group together. By examining
patterns of correlations among many items, researchers can identify a few underlying factors (like verbal
ability or numerical reasoning). This process simplifies the information and shows what the test is really
measuring.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////

Internal Consistency
Internal consistency checks whether different parts of the same test give similar results. For example, if
each part of a test (or each item) correlates well with the overall score, it means the test items are all
measuring the same trait. This is an important sign that the test is coherent and well-constructed.

/////////////////////////////////////////

Convergent and Discriminant Validation

Convergent Validation means that the test agrees well with other tests that are supposed to measure the
same trait.

Discriminant Validation means that the test does not show a high correlation with tests that measure
different traits.

Together, these methods help prove that the test is both accurately measuring the intended trait and not
being unduly influenced by irrelevant factors.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 Chapter test construction

Meaning of a Test
A test in psychology or education is not just a set of questions.

It is a standardized way to measure a trait or ability through a sample of behavior.

Tests can give a numerical score (quantitative) or an evaluation (qualitative) of what someone can do.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Classification of Tests
1. Based on Administration

Individual Tests: Given one-on-one (e.g., Block Design Test).

Group Tests: Given to several people at once (e.g., Bell Adjustment Inventory).

2. Based on Scoring

Objective Tests: Use multiple-choice, true/false, or matching questions; scored without personal opinion.

Subjective Tests: Use essay or open-ended questions; scoring involves some personal judgment.

3. Based on Time Limit

Power Tests: Allow plenty of time so most items can be answered; measure what a person knows.

Speed Tests: Have strict time limits; measure how fast someone can work.

4. Based on Content

Verbal Tests: Rely on reading, writing, and speaking (e.g., group intelligence tests).

Nonverbal Tests: Use pictures or symbols instead of words (e.g., Raven’s Progressive Matrices).

Performance Tests: Require a person to perform a task instead of answering questions.

Non language Tests: Do not depend on language; instructions may be given by gestures.

5. Based on Purpose

Examples include intelligence tests, aptitude tests, personality tests, and achievement tests.

6. Based on Standardization
Standardized Tests: Have fixed items, set rules for administration, scoring, and norms for comparison.

Teacher-Made Tests: Created by teachers for classroom use; may be less formal and have no published
norms.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Characteristics of a Good Test

Objectivity:

Items must be clear and interpreted the same way by everyone.

Scoring should be standardized so different examiners get the same result.

Reliability:

The test should give consistent results across different administrations (both within one test and over
time).

Validity:

The test must measure what it is supposed to measure by comparing its scores with an independent,
relevant standard.

Norms:

There should be established averages (norms) from a representative group to help interpret individual
scores.

Practicability:

The test should be manageable in terms of time, length, and ease of scoring.

///////////////////////////////////////////

General Steps of Test Construction

1. Planning:

Decide on the test’s overall purpose, objectives, target group, and testing conditions.

2. Writing Items:

Create test items (questions or tasks) that match the planned objectives.

3. Preliminary Administration:
Pilot the test with a small group to check its quality.

4. Assessing Reliability:

Test the consistency of the test through methods like retesting or internal consistency checks.

5. Assessing Validity:

Verify that the test measures what it is intended to measure by comparing it with external criteria.

6. Developing Norms:

Collect data from a representative sample to establish norms for interpreting scores.

7. Finalizing the Test:

Prepare a manual and final version of the test for widespread use.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

In Simple Words:
This outlines the basic meaning, classifications, good test characteristics, and steps for constructing a test
in simple, easy-to-understand language.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

1. Meaning of a Test in Psychology & Major Characteristics of a Good

Psychological Test

Meaning:

A psychological test is a standardized way to measure one or more traits or abilities through a set of
questions or tasks. It is designed to provide either a numerical score (quantitative) or an evaluation
(qualitative) of a person’s abilities.

Major Characteristics of a Good Test:

Objectivity: Items and scoring are clear and free from personal bias.

Reliability: The test gives consistent results when taken more than once.

Validity: It truly measures what it is supposed to measure by correlating with an independent standard.

Norms: There are reference scores from a representative group to interpret individual results.

Practicability: It is reasonable in length, time, and ease of scoring.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////

2. Distinction Between a Teacher-Made Test and a Standardized Test

Teacher-Made Test:

Created by teachers for their own classroom use.

Can be modified to suit specific class needs.

Often lacks formal norms and detailed statistical analysis.

Standardized Test:

Developed by test specialists under strict, uniform conditions.

Has fixed items, set administration and scoring procedures, and published norms.

Results can be compared across different groups because of its standard format.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

3. Plan for Classifying a Psychological and Educational Test

Tests can be classified according to various criteria:

Administration:

Individual Tests: One-on-one administration (e.g., Block Design Test).

Group Tests: Given to many people at once (e.g., Bell Adjustment Inventory).

Scoring:

Objective Tests: Multiple-choice, true/false, or matching items that are scored without subjective
judgment.

Subjective Tests: Essay or open-ended questions that require judgment to score.

Time Limit:

Power Tests: Generous time limits to complete all items, measuring knowledge.

Speed Tests: Strict time limits to see how quickly tasks can be completed.
Content:

Verbal Tests: Based on words and language (reading, writing).

Nonverbal Tests: Use pictures or symbols (e.g., Raven’s Progressive Matrices).

Performance Tests: Require the examinee to perform a task rather than answer questions.

Nonlanguage Tests: Do not depend on language; instructions given through gestures.

Purpose:

Examples include intelligence tests, aptitude tests, personality tests, and achievement tests.

//////////////////////////////////////////////

4. General Steps in Construction of a Psychological Test (with Examples)

Planning:

Define the test’s purpose, target group, content to be covered, and administration conditions.

Writing Down the Items:

Develop individual questions or tasks (items) using the planned objectives. For example, decide if the test
will include essay questions (subjective) or multiple-choice questions (objective).

Preliminary Administration (Experimental Try-Out):

Pilot the test with a sample of examinees to identify weak or ambiguous items, determine item difficulty
and discrimination, set a time limit, and adjust test length. This might be done in several stages (pre-try-
out, try-out proper, and final trial).

Assessing Reliability:

Administer the final test to a new sample (at least 100 participants) to calculate consistency using
methods like test-retest, split-half, or equivalent forms.

Assessing Validity:

Validate the test by comparing its scores to independent criteria (cross-validation) to check that it
measures what it is supposed to.
Developing Norms:

Collect data from a large, representative sample to create reference scores (norms) that help interpret
individual results.

Preparing the Manual and Final Test Materials:

Write detailed instructions on administration, scoring, and interpretation. Then, print the test and manual
for use.

////////////////////////////////////////////

5. What Is a Psychological Test? Essential Characteristics of a Good

Psychological Test
Definition:

A psychological test is a series of tasks or questions given in a standardized manner to measure a person’s
traits, abilities, or characteristics.

Essential Characteristics:

Standardization: Uniform procedures for administration and scoring.

Objectivity: Clear, unambiguous items and scoring criteria.

Reliability: Consistency of results over time or across different parts of the test.

Validity: Accuracy in measuring the intended trait or ability.

Norms: Comparison data from a relevant population to interpret individual scores.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

6. Nature of Standardization of a Test & Key Aspects Considered

Standardization:

It means the test is given and scored in a consistent, uniform manner so that scores can be compared
across different groups.

Key Aspects of Standardization:

Uniform Administration: Instructions and conditions are the same for everyone.

Consistent Scoring: A fixed scoring method is used, often with item analysis to ensure fairness.
Reliability and Validity: The test’s consistency and accuracy have been established.

Norms: The test has been administered to a representative sample, and norms (such as age, grade, or
percentile norms) are available for interpreting scores.

Fixed Items: The test content is not modified once the standard version is established.

///////////////////////////////////////

In simple words:This uses simple language to cover the meaning, classification, development, and
standardization of psychological tests.