The Word in Stone The Role of Architecture in The National Socialist Ideology Robert R. Taylor PDF Download
The Word in Stone The Role of Architecture in The National Socialist Ideology Robert R. Taylor PDF Download
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-word-in-stone-the-role-of-
architecture-in-the-national-socialist-ideology-robert-r-taylor/
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-last-post-cold-war-socialist-
federation-ethnicity-ideology-and-democracy-in-ethiopia-semahagn-
gashu-abebe/
https://ebookultra.com/download/external-liberalization-in-asia-post-
socialist-europe-and-brazil-first-edition-lance-taylor/
https://ebookultra.com/download/invisible-in-the-storm-the-role-of-
mathematics-in-understanding-weather-ian-roulstone/
Prime Green Remembering the Sixties First Edition Robert
Stone
https://ebookultra.com/download/prime-green-remembering-the-sixties-
first-edition-robert-stone/
https://ebookultra.com/download/law-ideology-and-collegiality-
judicial-behaviour-in-the-supreme-court-of-canada-1st-edition-donald-
r-songer/
https://ebookultra.com/download/word-frequencies-in-written-and-
spoken-english-based-on-the-british-national-corpus-1st-edition-
geoffrey-leech/
https://ebookultra.com/download/newfoundland-modern-architecture-in-
the-smallwood-years-1949-1972-1st-edition-robert-mellin/
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-politics-of-the-prussian-nobility-
the-development-of-a-conservative-ideology-1770-1848-robert-m-berdahl/
The Word in Stone The Role of Architecture in the
National Socialist Ideology Robert R. Taylor Digital
Instant Download
Author(s): Robert R. Taylor
ISBN(s): 9780520021938, 0520366662
Edition: Reprint 2020
File Details: PDF, 32.21 MB
Year: 1974
Language: english
THE WORD IN STONE
THE WORD
IN STONE
The Role of Architecture
in the National Socialist Ideology
Robert R. Taylor
U N I V E R S I T Y OF C A L I F O R N I A PRESS
BERKELEY, LOS A N G E L E S , L O N D O N
University of California Press
Berkeley and Los Angeles, California
University of California Press, Ltd.
London, England
Copyright © 1974, by
The Regents of the University of California
ISBN: 0-520-02193-2
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 79-186110
Printed in the United States of America
Designed by Jean Peters
For
Marjory and Angus
Taylor
Contents
P R E F A C E AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix
1 T H E S I G N I F I C A N C E OF " N A T I O N A L S O C I A L I S T "
ARCHITECTURE 1
2 ADOLF H I T L E R AND A R C H I T E C T U R E 15
4 T H E N A T I O N A L I S T V I E W OF A R C H I T E C T U R E 78
5 C O N T E M P O R A R Y ATTITUDES TO G E R M A N
ARCHITECTURE I O O O - 1 8 5 O : "SUPPRESSION" 90
6 C O N T E M P O R A R Y ATTITUDES TO G E R M A N
ARCHITECTURE SINCE 1 8 5 0 : "DECADENCE" 103
7 A R C H I T E C T U R E R E P R E S E N T A T I V E OF T H E
NEW GERMANY 126
NOTES
BIBLIOGRAPHY 281
INDEX 289
Preface and Acknowledgments
Christina Rossetti.
INDWELLING.
T. E. Brown (1830-1897).
Oh! ever thus from childhood’s hour,
I’ve seen my fondest hopes decay;
I never loved a tree or flower,
But ’twas the first to fade away.
I never nursed a dear gazelle
To glad me with its soft black eye,
But when it came to know me well,
And love me, it was sure to die!
As in other cases mentioned in the Preface, I find that these lines, so familiar in
my day, appear to be unknown to younger men.
ON BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES.
In taking leave of our Author (Sir William Blackstone) I finish
gladly with this pleasing peroration: a scrutinizing judgment,
perhaps, would not be altogether satisfied with it; but the ear is
soothed by it, and the heart is warmed.
Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) (A Fragment of Government).
I think it worth while quoting from my notes this amusing piece of sarcasm
aimed by a young man of twenty-eight at the most renowned legal writer of the
time. A Fragment of Government (1776), the first of Bentham’s works, not only
showed the utter folly of Blackstone’s praise of the English constitution, but also
laid the foundation of political science. (The passage, which the quotation refers
to, is in Sec. 2 of the Introduction to the Commentaries, “Thus far as to the right
of the supreme power to make law ... public tranquillity.”)
Not only was the English constitution a subject of eulogy in Bentham’s day, but
also English law, then in a most barbarous state, was alleged to be the perfection
of human reason! Through the efforts of this great and original thinker many
dreadful abuses were removed, but it is a remarkable illustration of the blind
strength of English conservatism that his wise counsel has not yet been followed
in many exceedingly important directions.
In the seventy-eighty period, with which this book mainly deals there was a
strong agitation for law reform, which had some results.
It was the boast of Augustus, that he found Rome of brick and left
it of marble. But how much nobler will be our Sovereign’s boast
when he shall have it to say that he found law dear, and left it
cheap; found it a sealed book—left it a living letter; found it the
patrimony of the rich—left it the inheritance of the poor; found it the
two-edged sword of craft and oppression—left it the staff of honesty
and the shield of innocence!
Lord Brougham (1778-1868) (Speech in Parliament, 1828).
It would indeed be a proud boast—but not one of these objects has yet been
achieved.
The same story is told in Rogers’ Table Talk, but a different judge is named.
(Probably both are wrong, but it is immaterial.) The London Tavern was where
Horne Tooke’s Constitutional Society met, and must have been often referred to
during the trial; but of course the meaning simply is that the throne of justice
cannot be approached with an empty purse.
Revenons à nos moutons.
(Let us return to our sheep.)
(La Farce de Maistre Pierre Patelin, Anon. 15 Cent.).
In the farce, a cloth merchant, who is suing his shepherd for stolen sheep,
discovers also that the attorney on the other side is a man who had robbed him of
some cloth. Dropping the charge against the shepherd, he begins accusing the
lawyer of his offence; and, to recall him to the point, the judge impatiently
interrupts him with Sus revenons à nos moutons, “Come, let us get back to our
sheep.”
Compare Martial VI, 19: “My suit has nothing to do with assault, or battery, or
poisoning, but is about three goats, which, I complain, have been stolen by my
neighbour. This the judge desires to have proved to him; but you, with swelling
words and extravagant gestures, dilate on the Battle of Cannae, the Mithridatic
war, and the perjuries of the insensate Carthaginians, the Syllae, the Marii, and the
Mucii. It is time, Postumus, to say something about my three goats.”
The reference to the French play I owe to King’s Classical and Foreign
Quotations.
(The wife of a poor man deserted him for another man, and he
married again. On being convicted for bigamy Mr. Justice Maule
sentenced him as follows:) Prisoner at the bar: You have been
convicted of the offence of bigamy, that is to say, of marrying a
woman while you had a wife still alive, though it is true she has
deserted you and is living in adultery with another man. You have,
therefore, committed a crime against the laws of your country, and
you have also acted under a very serious misapprehension of the
course which you ought to have pursued. You should have gone to
the ecclesiastical court and there obtained against your wife a
decree a mensa et thoro. You should then have brought an action in
the courts of common law and recovered, as no doubt you would
have recovered, damages against your wife’s paramour. Armed with
these decrees, you should have approached the legislature and
obtained an Act of Parliament which would have rendered you free
and legally competent to marry the person whom you have taken on
yourself to marry with no such sanction. It is quite true that these
proceedings would have cost you many hundreds of pounds,
whereas you probably have not as many pence. But the law knows
no distinction between rich and poor. The sentence of the court
upon you, therefore, is that you be imprisoned for one day, which
period has already been exceeded, as you have been in custody
since the commencement of the assizes.
Sir W. H. Maule (1788-1858).
This fine piece of irony, well known to lawyers, materially helped to end the old
bad state of the law of divorce. We need more men of the same stamp to draw
attention to other abuses.
In Racine’s comedy, Les Plaideurs, Act III, Sc. III, a prolix advocate begins his
speech by referring to the Creation of the world. “Avocat, passons au déluge” (Let
us get along to the Deluge), says the judge. See also The Merchant of Venice, Act
I, Sc. I:—
Gratiano speaks an infinite deal of nothing; more than any man in all Venice. His
reasons are as two grains of wheat hid in two bushels of chaff: you shall seek all
day ere you find them; and, when you have them, they are not worth the search.
“There’s nae place like hame,” quoth the de’il, when he found
himself in the Court o’ Session.
Scottish Proverb.
I understand that the original wording was “‘Hame’s hamely,’ quoth the de’il,
etc.” Perhaps the only English Institution which the Hindu appreciates is that of
English Law—but not as a system of Justice. To his acute mind it is a remarkably
clever and most ingenious gambling game. It is said that two Hindus will even
fabricate mutual complaints, the one against the other, to bring before the Courts
—and that it is almost equivalent to a patent of nobility to have had a case taken
to the Privy Council. The following incident actually happened to a friend of mine
who was Resident in a Native State. Sitting in his judicial capacity he reproved a
Hindu gentleman for his excessive litigiousness. The latter retorted that it was a
case of the pot calling the kettle black; that he had seen the Resident put his
rupees on the totalisator the day before; and the British race-course wasn’t a bit
more of a gamble than the British Law Courts. For his part he preferred to have
his flutter on the latter.
...
I retain this extract from Buchanan’s poem for the reason set out in the preface.
How many an acorn falls to die
For one that makes a tree!
How many a heart must pass me by
For one that cleaves to me!
ALL SUNG
What shall I sing when all is sung
And every tale is told,
And in the world is nothing young
That was not long since old?
R. le Gallienne.
Mr. le Gallienne was not the first to complain that poetic subjects were
exhausted. A recent Spectator quotes the following from Choerilus, a Samian poet
of the Fifth Century, B.C. (2,000 years before Shakespeare): “Happy was the
follower of the muses in that time, when the field was still virgin soil. But now
when all has been divided up and the arts have reached their limits, we are left
behind in the race, and, look where’er we may, there is no room anywhere for a
new-yoked chariot to make its way to the front.” (St. John Thackeray, Anthologia
Graeca).
Go out into the woods and valleys, when your heart is rather
harassed than bruised, and when you suffer from vexation more
than grief. Then the trees all hold out their arms to you to relieve
you of the burthen of your heavy thoughts; and the streams under
the trees glance at you as they run by, and will carry away your
trouble along with the fallen leaves; and the sweet-breathing air will
draw it off together with the silver multitudes of the dew. But let it
be with anguish or remorse in your heart that you go forth into
Nature, and instead of your speaking her language, you make her
speak yours. Your distress is then infused through all things and
clothes all things, and Nature only echoes and seems to authenticate
your self-loathing or your hopelessness. Then you find the device of
your sorrow on the argent shield of the moon, and see all the trees
of the field weeping and wringing their hands with you, while the
hills, seated at your side in sackcloth, look down upon you prostrate,
and reprove you like the comforters of Job.
Robert Alfred Vaughan (1823-1857) (Hours with the Mystics).
If this fine writer had lived, much might have been expected of him. He is one
of the many instances of “the fatal thirty-fours and thirty-sevens.”
First man appeared in the class of inorganic things,
Next he passed therefrom into that of plants,
For years he lived as one of the plants,
Remembering nought of his inorganic state so different;
And, when he passed from the vegetive to the animal state,
He had no remembrance of his state as a plant,
Except the inclination he felt to the world of plants,
Especially at the time of spring and sweet flowers;
Like the inclination of infants towards their mothers,
Which know not the cause of their inclination to the breast.
Again, the great Creator, as you know,
Drew man out of the animal into the human state.
Thus man passed from one order of nature to another,
Till he became wise and knowing and strong as he is now.
Of his first souls he has now no remembrance,
And he will be again changed from his present soul.[28]
The gases gather to the solid firmament; the chemic lump arrives
at the plant and grows; arrives at the quadruped and walks; arrives
at the man and thinks.
Emerson (Uses of Great Men).
HIAWATHA’S PHOTOGRAPHING
From his shoulder Hiawatha
Took the camera of rosewood,
Made of sliding, folding rosewood;
This he perched upon a tripod—
Crouched beneath its dusky cover—
Stretched his hand, enforcing silence—
Said, “Be motionless, I beg you!”
Mystic, awful was the process.
All the family in order
Sat before him for their pictures:
Each in turn, as he was taken,
Volunteered his own suggestions,
His ingenious suggestions.
First the Governor, the Father:
He suggested velvet curtains
Looped about a massy pillar;
And the corner of a table,
Of a rosewood dining-table.
He would hold a scroll of something,
Hold it firmly in his left-hand;
He would keep his right-hand buried
(Like Napoleon) in his waistcoat;
He would contemplate the distance
With a look of pensive meaning,
As of ducks that die in tempests.
Grand, heroic was the notion:
Yet the picture failed entirely:
Failed, because he moved a little,
Moved, because he couldn’t help it,
Next, his better half took courage;
She would have her picture taken,
She came dressed beyond description,
Dressed in jewels and in satin
Far too gorgeous for an empress.
Gracefully she sat down sideways,
With a simper scarcely human,
Holding in her hand a bouquet
Rather larger than a cabbage.
All the while that she was sitting,
Still the lady chattered, chattered,
Like a monkey in the forest,
“Am I sitting still?” she asked him
“Is my face enough in profile?
Shall I hold the bouquet higher?
Will it come into the picture?”
And the picture failed completely.
Next the Son, the Stunning-Cantab
He suggested curves of beauty,
Curves pervading all his figure,
Which the eye might follow onward,
Till they centered in the breast-pin,
Centered in the golden breast-pin.
He had learnt it all from Ruskin
And perhaps he had not fully
Understood his author’s meaning;
But, whatever was the reason,
All was fruitless, as the picture
Ended in an utter failure.
Next to him the eldest daughter:
She suggested very little,
Only asked if he would take her
With her look of “passive beauty.”
Her idea of passive beauty
Was a squinting of the left-eye,
Was a drooping of the right-eye,
Was a smile that went up sideways
To the corner of the nostrils.
Hiawatha, when she asked him,
Took no notice of the question,
Looked as if he hadn’t heard it;
But, when pointedly appealed to,
Smiled in his peculiar manner,
Coughed and said it “didn’t matter,”
Bit his lip and changed the subject.
Nor in this was he mistaken,
As the picture failed completely.
So in turn the other sisters.
Last, the youngest son was taken:
Very rough and thick his hair was,
Very round and red his face was,
Very dusty was his jacket,
Very fidgety his manner.
And his overbearing sisters
Called him names he disapproved of:
Called him Johnny, “Daddy’s Darling,”
Called him Jacky, “Scrubby School-boy.”
And, so awful was the picture,
In comparison the others
Seemed, to his bewildered fancy,
To have partially succeeded.
Finally my Hiawatha
Tumbled all the tribe together,
(“Grouped” is not the right expression).
And, as happy chance would have it,
Did at last obtain a picture
Where the faces all succeeded:
Each came out a perfect likeness.
Then they joined and all abused it,
Unrestrainedly abused it,
As “the worst and ugliest picture
They could possibly have dreamed of.
Giving one such strange expressions—
Sullen, stupid, pert expressions.
Really any one would take us
(Any one that did not know us)
For the most unpleasant people!”
(Hiawatha seemed to think so,
Seemed to think it not unlikely).
All together rang their voices,
Angry, loud, discordant voices,
As of dogs that howl in concert,
As of cats that wail in chorus.
But my Hiawatha’s patience,
His politeness and his patience,
Unaccountably had vanished,
And he left that happy party.
Neither did he leave them slowly,
With the calm deliberation,
The intense deliberation
Of a photographic artist:
But he left them in a hurry,
Left them in a mighty hurry,
Stating that he would not stand it,
Stating in emphatic language
What he’d be before he’d stand it.
Thus departed Hiawatha.
“All (that) I could never be, All (that) man ignored in me.” All that the world
could not know, a man’s thoughts, desires, and intentions, all that he wished or
tried to be or do, although unknown to his fellows, have their value in God’s eyes.
Man is the Cup, whose shape (i.e., character) has been formed by the wheel of
the great Potter, God. See further as to this Eastern metaphor.
The late Mrs. A. W. Verrall, widow of Doctor Verrall and herself a brilliant scholar,
pointed out in the Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, June, 1911, a
probable connection between “Rabbi ben Ezra,” and “Omar Khayyam,” and I do
not think that her interesting views have been published elsewhere.
Both poems centre round the idea of man as a Cup, but treat the metaphor
from very different standpoints. Omar’s cup (quoting from the first edition) is to be
filled with “Life’s Liquor” (ii), with “Wine! Red Wine!” (vi), with what “clears To-Day
of past regrets” (xx); the object is to drown the memory of the fact that “without
asking” we are “hurried hither” and “hurried hence” (xxx); the “Ruby Vintage” is to
be drunk “with old Khayyam,” and “when the Angel with his darker Draught draws
up” to us we are to take that draught without shrinking (xlviii). On the other hand
Rabbi ben Ezra’s Cup is to be used by the great Potter. We are told to look “not
down but up! to uses of a cup” (30). The Rabbi asks “God who mouldest men ...
to take and use His work” (32) and the ultimate purpose of the Cup, when it has
been made “perfect as planned,” is to slake the thirst of the Master.
The comparison of man to the Clay of the Potter in both poems is not sufficient
in itself to show any connection between them. Such a comparison is found, as
Fitzgerald reminds us, “in the Literature of the World from the Hebrew Prophets to
the present time”[30]; and it is as appropriately employed by the Hebrew as by the
Persian thinker. But Mrs. Verrall has other grounds:
The little pamphlet in its brown wrapper containing the Rubaiyat of Omar
Khayyam was first published by Edward Fitzgerald in 1859, and, as is well known,
attracted so little attention that, although there were only 250 copies, it found its
way into the two-penny boxes of the book-sellers, (It now sells for about £50!)
But, nevertheless, the poem was eagerly read and enthusiastically praised by a
small group, among whom were Swinburne and Rossetti. In 1861 Robert Browning
came to live in London, and often saw Rossetti, who was his friend. It is,
therefore, very improbable that he did not learn of the poem, which had so
impressed Rossetti. In 1864 “Rabbi ben Ezra” was published in the volume called
Dramatis Personae.
Again, there is intrinsic evidence that Browning intended a direct refutation of
Omar’s theory of life. Compare verses 26 and 27 of “Rabbi ben Ezra” with verses
xxxvi and xxxvii of “Omar Khayyam” (first edition).
Omar says that he “watched the Potter thumping his wet clay,” and, thereupon
advises:
Ah, fill the Cup;—what boots it to repeat
How Time is slipping underneath our Feet:
Unborn To-morrow and dead Yesterday,
Why fret about them if To-day be sweet!
and proceeds:
Although the “carpe diem” (“seize to-day”) theory of life is no doubt common to
all literatures, the cumulative effect of Mrs. Verrall’s argument is strong, although
not conclusive.
As regards the above verses, compare the next quotation.
From Thy will stream the worlds, life and nature, Thy dread
Sabaoth:
I will?—the mere atoms despise me! Why am I not loth
To look that, even that, in the face too? Why is it I dare
Think but lightly of such impuissance? What stops my despair?
This:—’tis not what man Does which exalts him, but what man
Would do!
R. Browning (Saul).
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookultra.com