Page 77 - 83 DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLSI.
112178
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL
SCIENCE AND INNOVATION
[ISSN 2581-9453]
Volume 6 | Issue 5
2024
© 2024 International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation
Follow this and additional works at: https://www.ijlsi.com/
Under the aegis of VidhiAagaz – Inking Your Brain (https://www.vidhiaagaz.com)
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the International Journal of Legal Science and
Innovation at VidhiAagaz. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Legal Science and
Innovation after due review.
In case of any suggestion or complaint, please contact [email protected].
To submit your Manuscript for Publication at International Journal of Legal Science and
Innovation, kindly email your Manuscript at
[email protected].
77 International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [Vol. 6 Iss 5; 77]
Theories and Modes of Punishment in
Indian Penal System
ANUJ KUMAR1 AND ARTI2
ABSTRACT
An act committed in violation of law where the consequences of conviction by court is
punishable, is especially when punishment is a serious one such as imprisonment. A serious
offence, especially one in violation of morality. Initially the civilization does not distinguish
between civil law and criminal law. The development of criminal justice system was in
early 18th century, where the criminal law had been formalized and effective mechanism
for prevention, control, prohibition and punishing the criminal was made. The law focused
on the behavior of criminal which leads to the crime and the methods to prevent the crime.
Whenever there is a commission of a crime in the society, the immediate consequence that
follows the criminal act is known as punishment.
Punishment is the most prominent feature of criminal law. The punishment involves all or
few from suffering, loss, pain, penality, image tarnish. The most prudent form of
punishment is imprisonment. In the recent trends, elimination of the crime from the society
is ought to be achieve by reformation, education of criminal.
Keywords: Crime, Penal, Theories.
I. INTRODUCTION
In simple terms, crime can be understood as the intentional commission of an act that is deemed
to be shortly harmful and also prohibited under the criminal laws. The crime is the collective
term denoted to Actus reus and Mens rea. Crime is caused by various factors such as poverty,
social influence, mental health, biological factor and criminal & societal behavior and
upbringing. There are various theories of punishment which are as follows-
1. Deterrent Theory
The word ‘deter’ means to prevent. Deterrent theory refers to restraining from doing a
particular act. It is an ancient theory of punishment. It means object is to fear criminals by
punishment and create fear among other person of society. So that they do not commit any
offence. Under this, hard punishment such as torture are given to criminals. The main object
1
Author is a student at Geeta Institute of Law, Panipat, Delhi NCR, India.
2 Author is a student at Geeta Institute of Law, Panipat, Delhi NCR, India.
© 2024. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [ISSN 2581-9453]
78 International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [Vol. 6 Iss 5; 77]
of the principle is to prevent crime by fear of punishment.
But it is not acceptable in the present times because many reasons are considered to commit
offence. Many time man commits offence due to compulsion or unawareness. This theory
focuses on how to stop criminals from future crimes and create fear among other mischievous
people in society. This theory is supported by-
1. Plato
2. Locke
3. Fischte
In other words, the object of this theory is not only to prevent the wrong doer and from doing
a wrong subsequently but also to make him an example for society and other tendencies.
a. Types of deterrence
1. Specific deterrence- This is on a specific individual. It as the use of punishment
for criminal activity intended to discourage a specific individual from
committing the crime again. For example, if an armed robber is sentenced to 8
years in prison the specific deterrence makes it less likely that he will come it
another armed robbery when he is eventually released.
2. General deterrence- It refers to the public from committing the same crime as
those already convicted of such offences. General deterrence is more focused
on teaching lessons to the public and not just individual is severally punished.
b. Deterrent theory in India
Case- state of M.P v. Union of India
Supreme Court stated that the sentence must be commensurate with the crime and it is the court
responsibility to impose an appropriate sentence based on the extent of the crime and
desirability of imposing such punishment.
c. Criticism
When a person is dying of Hunger, he will not be bothered on death punishment. In India, the
Supreme Court accepted this theory in recent times due to increment in murders dowry,
death, rape etc.
2. Retributive Theory
Retribute means to give in the return. The theory is also known as Vengeance theory, which
means that criminal should receive the same sufferings which are given by him to the victim.
© 2024. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [ISSN 2581-9453]
79 International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [Vol. 6 Iss 5; 77]
Retributive theory is the most prominent and leading more of punishing a criminal. The theory
basically stands on the principle of Revenge. It is based on the doctrine of Lex Talionis, the
states that the loss occurred to victims could only be compensated if the same loss is made to
the offender.
Sir John Salmond propounded the theory, according to him the main purpose of punishment is
to retaliate the harm inflicted by criminal to the society. Thus the society was of opinion that
the person doing the wrong should suffer the same proportion of pain. The theory is coned by
the multiple phrases such as, an eye for eye, tooth for tooth, limb for limb.
According to Salmond, revenge is not a remedy or cure of the crime but it is a reason in the
crimes. Mahatma Gandhi said that an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. The
objective of this theory is to make that usually the suffering of the pain by subjecting him to
the same kind of pain as he had given to the victim.
a. Aspects of the Theory
1. Penalty is grievance.
2. Crime is blameworthy culpable.
3. responsible for crime is responsible for punishment
b. Criticisms of The Theory
1. It expedites the offender.
2. There is no relief for the offense committed by the offender.
3. This type of punishment reflects the wild character of the justice.
Punishment are not always the revenge full but punishment should be the way of compensating
the loss occurred to the victim.
3. Reformative Theory
It is modern theory of punishment. Its main object is to reform the criminals. This theory
supports the principles that criminal can be prevented from crime by changing their heart.
According to this, theory many times people commit crimes due to compulsion poverty,
emotions, family conditions etc. These persons have feeling of guilt and they should be
provided opportunity to reform themselves. This theory is based on Gandhian principle " Hate
the sin, not the sinner". This theory was helpful to some extent in case of juveniles.
a. Object of this theory
© 2024. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [ISSN 2581-9453]
80 International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [Vol. 6 Iss 5; 77]
1. The country should be to transform the criminals rather than simply penalize
them.
2. The ideology behind the notion of punishment is not just two offer fairness to
victim but also to preserve safety and security in the community.
3. It transforms the criminal into a human.
4. The idea of punitive action is commonly associated with the law of crimes.
b. Law dealing with Reformative Theory
• Article 72 and article 161 of the Constitution of India.
• Article 72 provides for the President of India to pardon a wrong to her.
Governor of State also has the same authority under Article 161. The authority
of pardon arises to provide fairness whether it be from severe and unfair laws
or from verdict that leads to injustice.
• The juvenile justice-The Act focus to restore children and make them capable
member of community. This is demonstrated by fact that children under the age
of 18, who commit a crime a termed delinquent rather than criminals.
• The code of criminal procedure,1973-
1. Section 27- state that any crime not punishable with life imprisonment or if
committed by any individual who is below the age of 16 on the day he appears.
2. Section 360- enable Court to grant discharge on probation on good behavior or
after admonition.
3. Section 432- the government can suspend or remit the punishment in entirely
or in proportion at any period.
c. Case law
Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, 1980 AIR 1579
The court observed that fate treatment will enhance their personality rather than to affect or
regulate their life.
d. Drawbacks of theory
• If theory is applied to criminals. The prison will lose its meaning rather become
a dwelling house.
• The theory fails to meet its objective on criminals who are habitual offenders.
© 2024. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [ISSN 2581-9453]
81 International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [Vol. 6 Iss 5; 77]
• If a good citizen is punished for what he has not done, then this theory may have
adverse effects.
4. Preventive Theory
Preventive theory focuses on the prevention of the prisoner from offending the offence again
in the future. The death penalty serves the purpose of Preventive theory. The death penalty, life
imprisonment etc. is awarded to the criminal under this theory. This theory focuses-
• By putting the fear of punishment in the mind of the criminal.
• By permanently or temporary disabling the criminal.
• By the public at large about the threat of punishment.
5. Theory Of Compensation/ Expiatory Theory
The word expiry means ‘amend or propitate’ theory focuses on morals. This theory is supported
by Hagel and Kohler. According to Hagel, ' the punishment makes the criminal to expiate for
the wrong done'.
II. PUNISHMENT AND ITS MODES
Punishment is a way of penalizing the wrong dower for the harm which has been committed
by him against the society. The crime is always against the society and it is a duty of the state
to prevent the crime and the prevention of the crime is achieved by way of creating fear in the
mind of criminal which is done by punishing the wrong doer.
Punishment has been awarded because:
• In the past to ensure that crime is not repeated.
• In the present to create the fear.
• In the future to prevent the crime.
(A) Objectives of the Punishment
The main purpose of the punishing the criminal is to protect the society from the mischievous
elements and this can be achieved only by deterring the potential offenders. The main objective
of punishment is to eradicate evils and reform the criminal and change them into the law
abiding citizens.
(B) Punishment in ancient India
According to the historical texts and criminal literatures of prison system, the punishment in
the ancient India were brutal and cruel. The punishment goals were to take revenge for the
© 2024. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [ISSN 2581-9453]
82 International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [Vol. 6 Iss 5; 77]
wrong done to the society. Penalties fall under the following categories;
• Death Penalty and Capital punishment: It refers to the punishment which was of
extreme nature. In this kind, a person is executed to the death by the state for the
heinous crimes committed against the government and humanity.
• Corporal Punishment: It refers to the punishment by harming the offender physically,
it is also sometimes referred as physical torture to the culprit. The meaning of the
punishment is to set example into the society and in the front of potential law breakers.
• Social Punishment: It is a punishment in which the offender is prohibited from entering
into the society and he is made as stranger to the society by dislocating him to the
isolated and remote places. The main purpose of the punishment is to restrict the social
bonding of the prisoner.
• Financial Sanctions: Occasionally referred to as imposition of fine. The financial
sanctions are typically penalties that are not in severe nature but are to cover the
expenses of the criminal investigation and the loss occurred to the victim.
(C) Current Trend of Punishment in India
The harshness of the punishment now is determined by the seriousness of the crime. If any
person commits a serious crime he subjected to the harsh punishment and for the minor and
petty offences the punishment is less severe.
1. Death Sentence
The most severe punishment available in the modern Indian Criminology is that sentence is
granted in the case of serious offences, which are threat to the humanity and are treated as the
rarest of the rare crime. According to the Indian Penal Code, it is given out in the rarest of the
rare situation to set an example that the crime is always threat to the civilization.
2. Life in Prison / Life Imprisonment
A person gets a sentence to life in prison for the crimes which are committed by him
unlawfully. These are also of great severity but less than the death sentences. Life
Imprisonment is termed as alternative to the death sentences. According the Indian Penal
System, there us fixed term of life imprisonment, although in some cases of fractional duration,
the sentence is usually till the natural life.
3. Imprisonment
The literal meaning of the imprisonment is to detain the criminal into the jails for the time as
© 2024. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [ISSN 2581-9453]
83 International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [Vol. 6 Iss 5; 77]
decided by the judicial authorities. The main objective behind keeping the criminal into the
jails is to restrict the basic fundamental freedom of criminals. Imprisonment is sub headed into
3 categories-
a) Rigorous imprisonment: It is denoted by hard labor.
b) Simple Imprisonment: In this kind of imprisonment, the offender is merely kept in
custody and are not required to perform any kind of labor or hardship.
c) Solitary Confinement: It is the most severe kind of imprisonment in which the culprit
is kept isolated from outside. The main isolated criminals are usually the terrorist and
habitual law breakers who are kept into these confinements. They are usually dark
small rooms.
4. Forfeiture and Fine
It is denoted by loss or surrender of the any property or goods in reciprocal of the punishment.
Basically, the property is attached and fine is imposed in perceive of crime committed.
5. Community Service
It is newly added mode of punishment in the penal system. The focus of judicial system in now
shifting to reformation of criminal for betterment of society rather than punishment him
physically and by traditional modes. According to the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, the main
purpose of Community Service is to make the convict a better citizen and his reformation
should be utilized for goodwill of society.
III. CONCLUSION
As discussed above, crime can be understood as intentional commission of an act that is deemed
to be socially harmful and also prohibited under criminal law. It is also dynamic concept and
its ambit keeps on changing with development of new criminal behavior and punishments.
*****
© 2024. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation [ISSN 2581-9453]