Enhancing Teaching in Higher Education New Approaches To Improving Student Learning 1st Edition Peter Hartley Instant Download
Enhancing Teaching in Higher Education New Approaches To Improving Student Learning 1st Edition Peter Hartley Instant Download
https://ebookgate.com/product/enhancing-teaching-in-higher-
education-new-approaches-to-improving-student-learning-1st-
edition-peter-hartley/
Get the full ebook with Bonus Features for a Better Reading Experience on ebookgate.com
Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) available
Download now and explore formats that suit you...
https://ebookgate.com/product/teaching-psychology-in-higher-
education-1st-edition-dominic-upton/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/argumentation-in-higher-education-
improving-practice-through-theory-and-research-1st-edition-richard-
andrews/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/reshaping-teaching-in-higher-education-
linking-teaching-with-research-seda-series-first-edition-rosanna-
breen/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/teaching-geographic-information-science-
and-technology-in-higher-education-1st-edition-david-unwin/
ebookgate.com
Enhancing Teaching in Higher Education
This book brings together a collection of thought-provoking and challenging accounts from
higher education lecturers and practitioners who are using research and innovative techniques
to improve student learning and teaching.
Providing accessible accounts of new developments, it outlines how to apply learning theory
and best practice to everyday teaching, and provides advice on overcoming problems of
implementation.
Evidence is drawn from both funded projects and innovative practitioners from a wide
range of disciplines and backgrounds, and covers areas including approaches to learning,
working with students, enhancing the progress and development of students and supporting
and developing your own practice.
Enhancing Teaching in Higher Education addresses major issues for learning and teaching in
higher education today and will be a reliable source of advice and ideas for new and
experienced lecturers wanting to improve their students’ learning.
Peter Hartley, Professor of Education Development and Head of the Teaching Quality
Enhancement Group, School of Lifelong Educational and Development, University of
Bradford, UK.
Amanda Woods, Senior Research Fellow, Division of Primary Care, School of Community
Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.
Martin Pill, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Health, and chair of the Faculty Teaching
Learning and Assessment Committee, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of the West of
England, UK.
Enhancing Teaching in
Higher Education
New approaches for improving student
learning
List of illustrations vi
Notes on contributors vii
Preface xi
Index 195
Illustrations
Figures
Boxes
Colin Beard is a Senior Lecturer and University Teaching Fellow at Sheffield Hallam
University, with main research interests in innovative learning environments and
experiential learning. He is an International Environmental and Management Development
consultant and lead author of The Power of Experiential Learning. A Chartered Fellow of the
CIPD, he is a member of the Editorial Review Panel of the Journal of Adventure Education
and Outdoor Learning for the Institute for Outdoor Learning. Colin delivers Master Classes
on Innovative Experiential Learning in Singapore, China, India and Finland.
Glynis Cousin is a Senior Adviser at the Higher Education Academy. She supports
educational development and research initiatives in UK universities and is a Fellow of the
Staff and Educational Development Association.
Jane Fox, formerly Head of Nursing and Midwifery at University College Worcester, is
currently seconded to the Department of Health (Skills for Health), undertaking work
related to the development of a Partnership Quality Assurance Framework for England. She
has a particular interest in Accreditation of Prior Learning (L.Nyatanga, D.Forman and
J.Fox, Good Practice in the Accreditation of Prior Learning, Cassell: London, 1998),
interprofessional learning (Institute of Learning and Teaching small project award 2002/3)
and concept mapping.
Peter Hartley is Professor of Education Development and Head of the Teaching Quality
Enhancement Group at the University of Bradford. One of the first group of National Teaching
Fellows in 2000, he has produced educational multimedia (The Interviewer, Gower, 2004)
and a series of textbooks on human communication (e.g. Business Communication, with Clive
Bruckman, Routledge, 2001).
Gwyneth Hughes is the e-Learning Co-ordinator at the University of East London. She is
the leader of a short Masters-level course, Application of Learning Technologies, which has
been accredited by both SEDA and the ILTHE and has national recognition. Her recent
research and publications are in the area of e-learning and retention.
David Major is Director of the Centre for Work Related Studies at University College
Chester. He has been involved in a number of national work-based learning (WBL)
initiatives and has been working, with others, on the WBL curriculum at Chester since
1990.
Kathryn McFarlane is careers adviser and University Learning and Teaching Fellow in
the Careers and Employability Service at Staffordshire University. As well as working as a
careers adviser, she contributes to the curriculum through various modules, and has been
Module Leader for a centrally-run Careers Module. She has been chair of the University’s
Student Employability Group, which seeks to promote the employability agenda in the
University.
programme structure and also on the processes of learning and reflection in learning. Her
chapter in this book brings these two areas of work together.
Dot Morrison is Senior Lecturer within the Institute of Health and Social Care at
University College Worcester working mainly with pre- and post-registration nursing
students. She has a particular interest in the nature of knowledge, which underpins
professional practice, and developing learning and teaching strategies to enhance student
engagement.
Uma Patel is Lecturer in e-Learning in the School of Arts, City University. She has
responsibility for e-learning applications. Her research is the design of tools and conditions
for adult learning and professional development. She is interested in the role of technology
in constructions of professional identity, and the relationship between technology identity
and empowerment.
Jenny Phillips has worked in educational development within Higher Education for
several years, at both The Nottingham Trent University, and Birkbeck College, London.
Her specialist interests include assessment, accessibility of learning, technology-enhanced
learning and key skills.
Martin Pill is Senior Lecturer at the University of the West of England, Bristol where he
chairs the Faculty Teaching Learning and Assessment Committee. He is Reviews Editor for
the journal Active Learning in Higher Education, and has run workshops and seminars on
teaching and learning in this country and abroad.
Julie-Anne Regan is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Health and Social Care at
University College Chester. She is the progamme leader for the MSc in Health Promotion
but also works with pre- and post-registration nursing students to develop their teaching
and learning skills, with the aim of enhancing their experiences of Higher Education.
John Shaw is Principal Lecturer in Learning and Teaching for the Business Department,
London Metropolitan University. He has been teaching in Higher Education since 1972 in a
variety of settings—from access courses to postgraduate, from Croatia to Trinidad. He has a
variety of papers published including two articles in the THES, and the chapter in the recent
SEEC book on foundation degrees (Making Foundation Degrees Work, edited by Lyn Brennan
and David Gosling (SEEC, 2004)).
Vivien Sieber is currently introducing learning technologies into the Medical Science
Division, University of Oxford and is involved with a virtual learning environment and
computer-aided assessment. She had university-wide responsibility for learning technologies
at London Metropolitan (former University of North London) and managed the Teaching
and Learning Technology Centre which delivered staff training and multimedia
x
development. Vivien gained extensive teaching experience in genetics and study skills whilst
at The University of East London.
Amanda Woods is currently Senior Research Fellow at the Division of Primary Care,
University of Nottingham on secondment from her post as Lecturer in Child Health at the
School of Nursing. She is a social scientist and public health nurse and holder of a prestigious
Department of Health Primary Care Researcher Development Award which has enabled her
to pursue her research interests in public health and childhood safety promotion. Her recent
publications have been related to the learning needs of health care professionals.
Preface
We hope that lecturers in higher education (HE) from every subject background will find this
book both useful and challenging: useful because it contains a wide range of practical ideas
which we can immediately apply to our own teaching; and challenging because the chapters
invite us to reconsider and re-evaluate the ways we teach our students. We have tried to
concentrate on issues and developments that are having an important impact on the ways that
we all teach increasing numbers of undergraduate students.
These are interesting times as far as the development of teaching and learning in HE is
concerned. On the one hand, there has been a stream of initiatives over the last decade, all
designed to improve the quality of learning and teaching (and also the status of teaching) within
universities. An important example in the UK is the HE Academy. This was established in
2004 with ‘ambitious aims’ and a ‘focus on students and improving their experience’, as
described by its first chief executive, Paul Ramsden, in his first address to the annual funding
body conference. The Academy’s long-term ambition is to provide ‘an authoritative national
voice on teaching and learning issues, promoting the professional development of staff through
a range of services and supporting the enhancement work of universities and colleges’
(www.heacademy.ac.uk, April 2004). At institutional level, the new Centres for Excellence in
Learning and Teaching aim both to reward excellence and to encourage innovation in teaching
and learning. At individual level, the National Teaching Fellowship Scheme rewards institutional
nominees who have been recognised for particular contributions to teaching and learning: this
scheme expanded from 20 to 50 awards per annum in 2004.
These initiatives and others represent both an increasing recognition of the importance of
university teaching at all levels—from institutional strategy to individual initiatives—and an
increasingly interventionist stance by both funding bodies and the government. These trends
now characterise higher education in many countries, although the specific combination of the
schemes listed above has no or few direct counterparts in other parts of the world. But we
cannot say that they have been universally accepted as appropriate models for educational
change: all the initiatives have been debated in some detail and we can find strong arguments
for both their value and their limitations.
The combination of increasing intervention and rapid expansion has led to some sharp
contradictions and tensions. To illustrate the tensions and pressures, Paul Ramsden describes
higher education as facing ‘an almost certain future of relentless variation in a more austere
environment’ (Ramsden, 1998:3). But he also argues that ‘teaching is one of the most
delightful and exciting of all human activities when it is done well’ (Ramsden, 2003:5). The
form of such teaching has also become a focus of lively and often heated debate, and this is now
xii
regularly represented in both academic and press coverage. For example, consider a typical
selection of articles aken from a few weeks’ issues of the Times Higher Education Supplement.
One, with the deliberately provocative title of ‘Audit models “kill teaching’”, contrasted
comments from Sally Brown’s professorial lecture, defining excellence in teaching to include
‘passion for the subject’ and ‘commitment to students’ learning’, with concerns from Ben
Knights about the ‘shift away from academic disciplines and expert knowledge in favour of
generic teaching’ (Utley, 2004). A personal article from Peter Abbs described ‘the current
educational reality’ as a ‘blank pragmatism’ and asked: ‘can the personal and liberating
elements of education survive?’ (Abbs, 2004). In the same issue, Ken Bain described his
research study of a sample of ‘outstanding teachers’ in various universities. Common features
across different subject areas included attempts to ‘create natural critical learning
environments’ and ‘challenge students to rethink their assumptions’ (Bain, 2004). There is no
doubt that the quality and form of university teaching continues to arouse strong feelings and
commitment.
So we have powerful forces urging (and funding) educational change, serious debate (and
some profound concerns) about the likely outcomes of this change, and some considerable
operational problems evident in the expansion of HE. In the middle of this lively turmoil we
have the daily task of teaching and the approaches and perceptions of university staff. A recent
UK survey found that a majority of university academics felt that modern students are less
prepared than their predecessors for university life and that this has potentially damaging
implications for the curriculum. This same survey found that most academics also felt that
students were primarily motivated by concern over job prospects. Only a small percentage felt
that students were mainly pursuing knowledge for its own sake. Such perceptions may have
negative outcomes if they colour our approaches to teaching, especially when research on
student attitudes paints a more complex (and also more encouraging) picture of students as
‘conscientious consumers’ (Higgins et al., 2002).
The focus of this book is on this operational level—what we do as teachers and lecturers to
influence student learning—although many of our chapters make some comments on the
organisational and political contexts that affect what we do. All of our contributors are actively
involved in the enhancement of student learning and most have a significant teaching load. So
this book is primarily written by university lecturers for university lecturers. But it is not
intended as a comprehensive primer or guidebook on teaching practice, as these already exist
(e.g. Fry et al., 1999; Light and Cox, 2002; Ramsden, 2003). Rather, it is a collection of
chapters on important current (and future) issues in undergraduate higher education—
important issues that have been identified by the practitioners ‘at the sharp end’—and it is also
a source of ideas (and hopefully inspiration) on how practitioners can influence the shape and
processes of student learning. Also, unlike some handbooks on university teaching, we have
operated a ‘light-touch’ editorial policy and so you will find some tensions and contradictions
between chapters. As with all good teaching, our fundamental aim is to encourage debate and
dialogue.
All the chapters discuss issues that the authors feel strongly about and we hope you can
sense the commitment and enthusiasm that underpin each contribution. If this level of
commitment is as widespread as we believe it is then the future of teaching and learning in HE
is assured.
xiii
Approaches to learning
Our first section invites you to consider and evaluate your overall approach and perspectives
on learning and teaching in HE. The first chapter offers an approach that can be applied to any
curriculum and any/every subject area. Colin Beard and John Wilson argue that educational
theories in the past have not tried to cover all the possible components or variables that underpin
the learning process. Their Learning Combination Lock is a systematic process that enables the
educator to consider (and select from) a vast range of ingredients available in the development
of learning processes. The lock may also be used as a diagnostic tool to examine existing
programmes, helping us to determine whether these programmes cover the main elements of
the learning process.
Beard and Wilson give examples and illustrations to show how the model can be used. They
emphasise that it should not be used mechanistically but, rather, as a diagnostic aide memoire.
It can also be added to and developed according to the considerations of the programme and the
needs of the learner.
Moving from an over-arching tool to more specific interventions, David Major argues the
case for work-based learning, comparing evidence from the well-established Alverno
institution in the US with data from his own students at University College Chester. Using
evidence from student interviews and course outcomes, he argues that this form of learning
can provide insights and learning that we cannot expect from conventional instruction.
Annie Huntington explores approaches to interactive learning by reflecting upon her own
very substantial teaching experience. She looks at both opportunities and issues for lecturers
who wish to move along the spectrum towards interactive teaching. Of course, in one sense all
teaching is interactive and this is why we need to consider a spectrum that ranges from the
inclusion of interactive exercises within an otherwise tutor-controlled lecture to frameworks
and strategies where students have to confront their personal responses to the material and
engage in reflective practice. One of her strategies is to share theories with students. And this
is a practice that crops up in several of our chapters, where students are encouraged to test and
apply theories to their own personal experience rather than simply accepting them as truths
that cannot be challenged in any context. She also raises problems of ethical practice and the
difficulties of dealing with students’ emotional responses, another theme that crops up in
subsequent chapters.
conclude that the planned use of concept maps can make an important contribution to student
learning. Their experience is not only that it helps students understand particular topics/
concepts but it also provides a strategy to foster higher-order learning and cognition,
encouraging students to be analytical rather than simply descriptive. Some students continue to
incorporate concept mapping as an important ingredient in their own learning repertoire.
If we are encouraging students to take more responsibility for their own learning (and
adopting techniques such as problem-based learning) then we need to consider how we
operate as members of staff to support students working in this way. Tina Clouston offers the
view from the student perspective, using the experiences of student participants whose views
were collected through questionnaires, focus groups and narratives over a two-year period.
And it is important to recognise that students do not necessarily view excellent teaching in the
same way as academic staff do.
There are a number of important lessons for all of us in this chapter. For example, the ‘good
news’ is that you do not have to adopt a particular personal style, which may not suit you, in
order to achieve effective outcomes. The ‘bad news’ is of course that self-awareness is a very
important skill that is not simply acquired overnight. It requires constant review and is also
extremely hard work.
Peter Hartley notes the increased application of group methods in HE teaching and asks
what (and how) students learn from these group activities and projects. He argues that much
of our current knowledge about group dynamics has been derived from particular non-
educational contexts and that this has worrying implications for our interactions with student
groups. In other words, we have fairly limited evidence about how student project groups
really ‘work’. After offering examples that show how prescriptions about group behaviour
based on business or organisational evidence may not apply to student groups in quite the same
way, he shows how we can turn this situation to our advantage. We need to involve students in
inquiry into their own group processes and use this as a vehicle to develop their critical and
reflective skills.
Gwyneth Hughes’ chapter focuses on the process of learning online and the resources
available to help online learners, such as tutorials on web searching. She responds to two key
questions: how can we embed learning-to-learn online skills into the curriculum?; and how are
learners best encouraged to use learning-to-learn resources? Using models such as Salmon’s
stages for successful e-moderating and relating this to her own research on different student
attitudes to online learning, she demonstrates a number of ways of getting students involved.
The chapter concludes with a useful checklist for including learning-to-learn online skills in
your curriculum.
Jo Smedley investigates ‘blended learning’, where the use of human and technological
components can overcome the respective limitations of face-to-face and e-learning. The roles
and responsibilities of learners and tutors in a blended learning experience are highlighted,
with particular emphasis on the design issues inherent in a successful blended learning course.
Finally, a set of case studies demonstrate blended learning in action and provide evidence of
the diversity of the student experience that can be achieved via the creative use of this style of
learning.
Self-directed learning has become one of the new slogans. But what do students make of it?
Julie-Anne Regan’s chapter summarises the main results from a year-long study of students’
perspectives of self-directed learning (SDL). She concludes that facilitating students to become
xv
self-directed learners needs to be as carefully planned as the subject content of the curriculum.
This means an incremental approach to developing independent learners, offering more
direction at the start of the programme until students are better equipped to assess their own
learning needs. Failing to facilitate SDL in this way can create barriers to becoming an
independent learner and cause the student unnecessary anxiety and distress. One intriguing
outcome of this study is the strong link between SDL and tutor-centred approaches such as
lectures. This link appears stronger than has previously been highlighted in the literature
on SDL.
John Shaw considers how teaching staff learn about learning. His case study, working with
colleagues on a franchised course, shows how the practice of education research (and in his
case, action research) had a very powerful impact. Research findings were used to make
improvements to the curriculum which made a very significant difference—for example,
student retention improved by 30 per cent. This improvement can partly be attributed to the
special attention that the student sample received, but the structural changes to the course had
longer-term effects. And, of course, action research can be ongoing and maintain impetus.
Perhaps more important in the long run, especially given the limited financial resources, was
the positive impact on staff—he describes the process as ‘the key to a major block to staff
development’.
Vivien Sieber explores the main barriers to using ICT and Learning Technology
encountered by academic staff and, to a lesser extent, by institutions, and describes a range of
initiatives designed to overcome them. She discusses barriers under three main categories:
technical and skill issues; issues relating to learning and teaching; and issues arising from lack
of appreciation of opportunities or fear. She concludes that progress depends on two related
and complementary processes: teaching staff must overcome the barriers of fear of technology
and appreciate the opportunities offered to enhance their teaching; and institutions must
recognise the investment in infrastructure, support and staff needed to develop the necessary
materials.
Peter Mangan and Uma Patel focus upon an increasingly important group of staff—those on
part-time hourly contracts, often referred to as visiting lecturers (VLs). Their case study is an
online staff development facility, AMBIENT, which has been developed to address VLs’
learning requirements, using information from self-assessment of their learning needs. They
explore the issues that can act as barriers to VLs’ online learning success, and expose as
problematic the relationship between the availability of web-based staff development and
evidence of successful learning. These issues include predictable ones, for example access to
the web and ICT skills, but also the unexpected, for example where working out professional
identity in the context of the ‘new managerialism’ in higher education has assumed a new
urgency. They conclude by reflecting upon the paradoxes inherent within online staff
development.
Alan Hurst argues that none of us can ignore the implications of changes to legislation
covering discrimination that have applied to the UK HE sector from September 2002. We may
all share the values of encouraging access to higher education but the recent legislation does
give us additional responsibilities. We can no longer simply respond to students’ difficulties
after they arrive in our classrooms. The legislation obliges us to anticipate that students with
particular disabilities will wish to attend our courses and we need to make ‘reasonable
adjustments’ to make sure that those students are not discriminated against. In other words,
we need to plan in advance to make our courses accessible and inclusive rather than solving
problems after they emerge. He advocates the ‘four As’: awareness of disabilities, audit
current practices, anticipate future needs, and action to implement inclusive learning. Perhaps
the most powerful message in this chapter is the conclusion that if we make these adjustments
to our provision then we are actually more likely to benefit all students.
In our final chapter, Glynis Cousin argues that many of our attempts to encourage equal
opportunities are based upon mistaken or misleading notions of human identity. She argues
very powerfully that we must resist attempts to classify individuals in over-restrictive
xvii
categories or boxes. Given that one of the main themes running through this book is the search
for ways of encouraging student autonomy and self-confidence, then this argument is an
appropriate place for us to wind up this volume.
We hope that you do find at least some of the content is useful and you should certainly find
some, if not many, of the ideas challenging. We also hope that this will stimulate further
dialogue, again echoing the spirit of our last chapter.
Peter Hartley, Amanda Woods
and Martin Pill
Acknowledgements
This book started as an ILT initiative—members were invited to propose chapters which
discussed important concerns and innovations in HE teaching. It would not have happened
without the enthusiasm and commitment of Sally Brown and we are also indebted to Stephen
Jones for his considerable patience and unflagging support.
References
Abbs, P. (2004) Why I…believe the higher education bill will increase alienation from learning,
Times Higher Education Supplement, 7 May, 14.
Bain, K. (2004) Art of old masters in moulding minds, Times Higher Education Supplement, 7 May, 23.
Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (1999) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher
Education: Enhancing Academic Practice, London: Kogan Page.
Higgins, R., Hartley, P. and Skelton, A. (2002) The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role
of assessment feedback in student learning, Studies in Higher Education, 27, 1, 53–64.
Light, G. and Cox, R. (2001) Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Reflective Professional,
London, Sage Publications.
Ramsden, P. (1998) Learning to Lead in Higher Education, London: Routledge.
Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education, 2nd edition, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Utley, A. (2004) Audit models ‘kill teaching’, Times Higher Education Supplement, 23 April, 2.
xviii
Part one
Approaches to learning
2
1
Ingredients for effective learning: the
Learning Combination Lock
Colin Beard and John P.Wilson
Introduction
Do all your first year students still arrive bright and keen at 9.00 a.m. on a Monday morning in
the last week of the semester? How do we design their learning experience to sustain interest,
motivation and enthusiasm? Do we go with our instincts and encourage learning through
applying methods that have worked in the past, or do we base our teaching on theories of learning
and, if so, which ones from the vast range that exists?
Our answer to this dilemma is a model that offers a systematic process for the educator to
consider and select from a vast range of ingredients available in the development of learning
processes: the Learning Combination Lock (LCL). The LCL can also be used as a diagnostic
tool to examine existing programmes and determine whether they cover the main elements of
the learning process.
The LCL is not intended to be used mechanistically but rather as a diagnostic aide-memoire
that may also be added to and developed according to the considerations of the programme and
the needs of the learner. This chapter describes the LCL and offers a range of clues and
practical applications that may be used to enhance your students’ learning environment and
link theory and practice.
isolation, thus giving only a partial picture of the learning environment. We need to identify
all the core components to help practitioners in Higher Education diagnose and design
activities that create high-quality learning experiences for students. For example, Light and
Cox (2001:109) note that:
The design of this relationship between lecture structures and activities provides the key
location for creativity and innovation in lecturing. Even given the usual academic
constraints of what is ‘permissible’ as well as those of space, time, resources and so
forth, the permutations and possibilities available to the lecturer are limited primarily
by their imagination and confidence.
As lecturers we need to experiment and sometimes take risks in our own learning journeys.
The LCL can support the creative exploration of activity design, although we cannot ignore the
institutional difficulties of generating effective approaches:
The cultural environment of higher education does little to foster active learning to
strengthen critical thinking and creativity skills in its students…. Faculty are given little
time, budget, encouragement or support to develop ‘active learning’ tools that assist in
developing these skills. Incorporating ‘active learning’ pedagogic techniques, for
example, developing and running exercises, group projects, or simulations, is risky for
a faculty and there is no guarantee that these techniques will work or that students
see the benefits of this form of pedagogic method. Fortunately, but slowly, the cultural
INGREDIENTS FOR EFFECTIVE LEARNING 5
environment that places barriers to moving toward more innovative pedagogical tools is
eroding away.
(Snyder, 2003:159)
We are not presenting fixed choices in the LCL but offering many more possibilities to
experiment with and reflect upon. Starting on the left, the learning environment tumbler
identifies various components found in the physical external environment that may be used as
part of the learning process. Adjacent is the tumbler that examines the core components of
learning activities. The third tumbler represents the senses as the mediator that connects the
external environment with the internal cognitive environment. Our senses alert us to the
presence of the stimuli that begin the process of perceiving and interpreting.
The emotions tumbler presents some of the vast range of emotional responses we can make
and is a very powerful aspect of the learning equation. In designing a learning programme we
may wish to instil certain emotions to enhance the learning situation as well as manage and
recognise the emotional agenda of the broader student experience.
The fifth tumbler explores various forms of intelligence whose development may be the
objective of the learning process.
The final tumbler represents various theories of learning. There is still so much that we do not
know about learning, so it is important to be aware of the various learning theories and also
our own underlying theories of how learning may best be facilitated. By making these explicit
we may better understand our own thinking and the behaviour and motives of learners.
Well-established research shows that students learn best when they are actively engaged
rather than being passive observers…there are three avenues an institution can
promote to foster active student learning. First, certain teaching methodologies, such as
6 COLIN BEARD AND JOHN P.WILSON
Of course, ‘furnishings’ represent a small fraction of the many physical elements that can be
managed in the learners’ environment. Informal learning environments are increasingly being
recognised and used for more formal learning. While students traditionally spent many
hundreds of hours learning in lecture theatres and seminar rooms, learning space is
increasingly spilling over into, and being used alongside: informal learning spaces; drama
studios; stage; laboratory; virtual learning environments; lecture theatres; seminar rooms; café
learning spaces; group spaces; stand-up corridor computer malls; and even innovation rooms
and relaxation lecture theatres, including the use of hammocks in lecture theatres in Finland,
specifically designed to enhance the creation of certain mental states, such as relaxed alertness
(see also Beard and Wilson, 2002). There is growing evidence elsewhere too that new learning
spaces are evolving:
[Arizona State University has a] special Kaleidoscope room [which] holds 120 students;
however, the faculty is never more than five rows away from any student. The
instructor relates to a few groups of students rather than a mass of 120 students…the
atmosphere is one of work, action, involvement…. Stanford University has designed
highly flexible technology-rich class-lab learning environments using bean bags for
much the same purpose as tables…. We recommend that the entire planning process for
design and renovation of classrooms includes faculty and staff with expertise in learning
methodologies.
(www-lib.iupui.edu/itt/planlearn/part1.html,
accessed 27 November, 2004)
Unfortunately, the lack of knowledge about the relationship between buildings and learning,
and the lack of dialogue between academics and facilities managers is still constraining
developments (Beard and Matzdorf, 2004) and so academics are often left to merely adapt to
given space. Furthermore, the replacement of old learning spaces with new facilities is
expensive and is a long-term investment.
Smith (1998) argues that: ‘We are not designed to sit slumped behind a piece of wood for
an hour and ten minutes at a time, nor are we designed to sit for three hours in front of a
television screen or a computer terminal’ Similarly, Jensen (1995) refers to the work of Dunn
and Dunn (1978) who found that ‘at least 20% of learners are significantly affected, positively
or negatively, by seating options or lack of them’. So perhaps we do need to explore more
innovative use of existing space until such time that the design of learning space sits more at
ease alongside pedagogical requirements. Floor space and wall space can be used for creative,
more active engagement of learners (see case study 3 below).
INGREDIENTS FOR EFFECTIVE LEARNING 7
Technological tools are also influencing learning space, with items such as interactive
whiteboards, which can enable the instant capturing of fresh, ‘live’ and indigenous intellectual
property. As pedagogy interacts with the operational facilities and media technology, the
learning environment will undergo rapid change. This will change the future layout of walls
and learning space and enable active movement of people and information. This is important,
for we believe that good learning environments will increasingly provide areas that maximise
the flexibility and mobility of information, people and space, enabling the physical viewing of
information and concepts from different perspectives.
1 Creating a sense of a learning journey for students, with a clear vision of the bigger picture,
with a clear destination, and route maps to guide the way.
2 Creating and sequencing an array of intellectually, physically and emotionally stimulating
‘waves’ of activities.
3 Adjusting or suspending elements of simulation and reality to create learning steps.
4 Creating activities to stimulate and regularly alter moods…acknowledge the student
experience, create relaxed alertness, understand peak or flow learning.
5 Using the notion of constructing or deconstructing activities, such as physical objects, or non-
physical items, e.g. the gradual construction of a model, a concept, historical maps, key
ingredients, typologies, a phrase or poem.
8 COLIN BEARD AND JOHN P.WILSON
CASE STUDY 1:
A JOURNEY THROUGH DEGREES OF REALITY TO DEVELOP
PRACTICAL NEGOTIATING SKILLS
The course: negotiating skills for public rights of way officers—public
access to the UK countryside
Negotiating is a ‘broad skill’, involving the building of the many composite narrow
skills such as listening, questioning, diplomacy and so on. On this course we identified the
many narrow sub-skills such as influencing, persuasion, listening, tactics, entry,
developing rapport, closing and so on. The sessions use ‘narrow skills’ practice. The latter
part of the course then used broad skills practice: but with varying levels of reality or
simulation as follows:
From: low content reality
Exercise A: redecorating the office
This is a paper exercise from a standard package on negotiating. It concerns a contract
price to decorate an office suite. People are asked to identify opening gambits and write
their answers on paper.
Exercise B: driving a bargain
This is a written exercise about cars—people are told that this is a warm-up for a real car
exercise when people can pit their wits against real negotiators.
Exercise C: buying a new car
Real cars and log books are used. Cars can be inspected and faults found, both inside and
outside, as they are located in the car park. The participants negotiate with trained
negotiators who are located in an office where the deals will take place. Final agreements
are written in sealed envelopes so that the winners can be decided later.
To: high content reality
Exercise D: negotiating access to UK land on behalf of the public
Real negotiators are again present. Real job information is provided, e.g. complex facts
and figures on sheep headage payments, ranger support offered, etc. For participants, the
incentive is to try to do a good job in front of their peers; put all the skills and knowledge
acquired on the course into practice; and meet their own pre-set prices and subsidy
targets decided in their negotiating plans. They argue their case with real negotiators and
are debriefed afterwards. Videos are replayed with self and peer assessment.
(adapted from Beard and McPherson, 1999)
CASE STUDY 2:
USING DIFFERENT SENSES
The course: teaching taxonomy and classif ication to botany students
10 COLIN BEARD AND JOHN P.WILSON
Popular objects, and popular media can act as physical and visual metaphors for learning.
Here, the teaching of the classification of animals uses a bag of assorted nuts, bolts and
screws for students to create a classification system or an identification key…
Students are divided into teams and receive a bag of various nails, staples, screws, nuts
and bolts, etc. They are told they are renowned taxonomists, and that they have to
develop a classification scheme that meets the established rules of the Linnaean system.
They also have to be prepared to defend their classification scheme orally. The students
have to make a phylogenetic chart of their classification scheme using the poster paper,
tape and objects, including all of the categories from phylum to species.
They are asked to consider a range of probing questions, such as the rationale that was
used for each category and the criteria they used to differentiate among categories? Did
they rely more on ‘form’ or ‘function’? Or derived and ancestral traits? They also have to
consider the difficulties and issues associated with the difficulties and differences between
classifying inanimate objects and living organisms.
This activity is taken from the web site: www.jrscience.wcp.muohio.edu/lab/
taxonomylab.html, accessed 1 May, 2004.
at higher levels’ (Boud et al., 1993:14). Fineman (1997:13) makes a similar observation:
‘Learning is inextricably emotional and of emotions. The traditional cognitive approach to
management learning has obscured the presence and role of emotion.’ Similarly Light and Cox
explain that:
Students regard knowledge and learning as something external and objective, right or
wrong. This sort of epistemological perspective is extremely difficult to give up if it is
held with any conviction, a conviction that quite often goes back to early childhood and
may be strongly invested in emotion. Teachers and the learning environment may be
vested with many of the qualities of parental or childhood authority figures. The
difficult transitions from the security of dualism into the security of relativism is not simply
a matter of absorbing new ideas or information, but is very much a restructuring at
an emotional level as well as a cognitive level, and may be accompanied by
extreme anxiety.
(Light and Cox, 2001:57, emphasis added)
During the past few years this failure to consider emotional awareness has decreased as a result
of writings on emotion and emotional intelligence. Goleman (1995) championed the subject
and drew on the work of Salovey and Mayer (1990) who classified emotional intelligence into
five main domains: knowing one’s emotions, managing emotions, motivating oneself,
recognising emotions in others, and handling relationships.
Our view is that the emotional tumbler represents the crucial ‘gatekeeper’ to deep
learning. Managing the emotional climate, accessing emotion, mapping or encouraging change
in the basic emotional make-up of students is a difficult yet necessary skill for lecturers.
Mortiboys (2002) looks at the potential for using emotional intelligence to make HE lecturing
more satisfying and effective. He scrutinises the case for the development of emotionally
intelligent lecturers and refers to research into areas such as classroom climate and lecturer
qualities. Students responded to questions about their favourite session using words such as
‘enthusiastic’, ‘fascination’, ‘being valued’, ‘confident’, ‘curious’ and ‘excited’.
INGREDIENTS FOR EFFECTIVE LEARNING 11
It can be inferred that a number of these responses, both positive and negative, are
reactions to the lecturer. In the same way that a lecturer influences, but is not wholly
responsible for, the performance of their students, so it is with the feelings aroused by
students. Whether you refer to your role as a facilitator, lecturer, tutor or educator,
there are times when you interact with individual students and/or groups of students
and the way you are affects the way they feel, which in turn influences their
predisposition to learning.
(Mortiboys, 2002:10)
Being able to acknowledge and sense underpinning emotions and, where appropriate, steer
the emotional bases of student behaviour, is a key skill requiring an understanding of factors
affecting student motivation, such as identity, sociality, meaning and orientation. This needs
emotional maturity, responsibility and personal understanding by tutors. Students are
increasingly being encouraged to undertake personal and professional development portfolios
and progress files which, through reflective exercises, help them to examine their emotional
states in the learning journey.
Learning is enhanced when people discover things for themselves through their own
emotional engagement. This requires a commitment to discovery, experimentation and
reviewing of personal emotional goals and visions. Emotional intelligence underpins learning
as a basic building block. In order for any experience to be interpreted in a constructive
manner it is essential that learners possess abilities such as:
By combining the ‘adventure waves’ of Mortlock (1984) with the ‘flow learning’ from
Cornell (1989) and the work of Dainty and Lucas (1992) it is possible to create a six step
emotional wave. For example, lecturers might map and plan the emotional journey of waves that
the student experiences throughout a semester. For example, is it realistic to try to convey
complex information to freshers on their first morning when they may be disorientated?
Surely, we should consider and tap into their emotions to enhance the learning process.
Preparation might be done through the use of twelve cards identifying the types of emotions
during each week of the semester, which is a different approach to the planning process. In
programme design we might consider the six steps thus:
Emotions and the concept of emotional intelligence could have been incorporated in the next
tumbler, i.e. forms of intelligence. However, we believe that emotion is a critical component of
learning and should be considered independently of the other forms of intelligence thus meriting
a separate tumbler.
CASE STUDY 3:
USING FLOW LEARNING
Course: developing critical reading in postgraduate students
We used the mood-setting frame of lounging about reading the Sunday newspapers—but
instead of newspapers we used academic journal articles from a range of well-known
sources. The participants soon had their shoes off, sitting or lying on comfortable sofas,
sometimes with cats sleeping next to them, and with soft rainforest music playing. Coffee
percolators bubble away, Earl Grey tea is on offer and lemon scents the air. The articles
are from People Management, and Management Learning, Management Education and
Development, People and Organisations, Training and Development, Industrial and Commercial
Training, Sloan Management Review, Harvard Business Review, and many others. Hardly
Sunday morning reading!
Subtly included in the reading material were articles that encouraged students to be
aware of themselves; to be critical of these articles. We were encouraging students to
become more relaxed about the ‘literature’ associated with their subject, to encourage
them to share, become fascinated, get copies of lots of material because they wanted to
take it home, and to learn to communicate and explore their findings with each other.
Following the reading the tutor acted as a scribe and facilitator. The subsequent
evaluation of the session showed that students wanted more time in future to repeat these
explorations of the literature and to play with concepts and ideas in this relaxed way. One
student said: ‘During these sessions, differing views concerning the same articles were
discussed and new insights developed based on individual experience outside the articles.
This led to a spin of ideas that spurred more new ideas, and re-shaped some of my initial
thoughts of the article.’
(adapted from Beard and McPherson, 1999)
reading books, journal logs, debate, storytelling, verbal humour, poetry, creative writing.
Bodily/kinaesthetic learning activities might include: role play, moving laminated cards, things
to touch/feel, using physical metaphors, encouraging movement, stick-it labels that can be
rearranged. Mathematical logical activities might use mind maps, systems processing, force
field analysis, assigning numbers to things. Visual/spatial learning activities might use wall
charts, spatial anchors, gestures by lecturers, guided visualisation or imagery, visual aids,
sketches and diagrammatic representations. More examples can be found in Beard and
Wilson (2002).
CASE STUDY 4:
USING SPACE TO WALK THE TALK
Course: mapping history
Students research the history first in groups. The following week they map the
environmental history on the floor using laminated coloured cards that represent different
contents…blue for laws such as the National Parks Act, yellow for NGOs, grey for
QUANGOS such as the Countryside Agency or English Nature, orange for key events in
history such as the Wars or the Mass Trespass (1932). In addition, there are other cards
with dates on and blank cards to fill in. All the essential kit is presented in a plastic video
case. The picture-map layout on the floor or table demonstrates their knowledge of the
subject and when finished students walk the talk presenting the historical picture as they
proceed. This kinaesthetically reinforces the learning and tests understanding in a visual -
oral way.
The same can be done with a literature review and key texts. The texts are spread out
in a large space and debated and discussed as people move around them—the spatial
re-organisation and debate is key. Explore similarities and differences. Use newspaper
stories first to explore these skills with less experienced people.
of the advantages and limitations of our espoused and tacit theories (Polanyi, 1967) on
knowledge and learning. This awareness and examination of our approaches to learning,
whether as a learner or enabler of learning in others, should lead to more considered and
appropriate learning opportunities rather than instinctive or random methods to the selection
of learning approaches.
The theories of learning are too numerous to mention here although a number of categories
have been detailed by Beard and Wilson (2002:194–5). The LCL is sufficiently
accommodating to incorporate, to some degree, these categories and theories of learning.
14 COLIN BEARD AND JOHN P.WILSON
While no model can fully represent the learning process, the LCL does attempt to provide a
meta-perspective and act as an aide-memoire.
• It provides a broad perspective of the learning process and its various elements and
theories.
• It is sufficiently flexible to incorporate the main behavioural, cognitive and humanist
schools of learning without placing them in opposition to each other.
• It provides a systematic approach to the support of learning.
• The checklist of elements for each tumbler provides an aide-memoire for the educator,
trainer and developer.
• The metaphor of the combination lock should not limit the use of only one ingredient from
each tumbler. In practice learning events may incorporate several elements from a
tumbler.
• The metal rod running through the core of the LCL represents the needs of the learner.
These should be central to any consideration of the various options available in each of the
tumblers.
• It should not be used as a one-armed-bandit approach to selecting the ingredients for
experiential learning activities. The learning needs and objectives should be carefully
considered before addressing each tumbler in turn and selecting those combinations that
are likely to be effective.
• The LCL is not an exclusive list of the tumblers and elements that might be considered in
the design of the learning event. It allows trainers, educators and developers to add to the
lock and build their own personalised set of learning permutations that respond to learning
needs, thus adding to the millions of combinations. We encourage you, the reader, to
customise the model for your own particular requirements.
• The LCL should not be applied in a mechanical fashion without an understanding of the
tumblers and the principles of learning. Rather, it should be considered a form of reference
source to guide the design and delivery of programmes.
Conclusion
The LCL identifies the main components of the learning process. Detailing these elements in
the six tumblers enables systematic consideration of the potential ingredients and provides the
opportunity to select from an almost infinite number of learning permutations.
The value of the LCL lies in the extent to which it is considered, applied and further
developed. Please feel free to use and adapt this model for your own purposes. As Kurt Lewin
stated: ‘There is nothing so practical as a good theory.’
INGREDIENTS FOR EFFECTIVE LEARNING 15
References
Beard, C. and McPherson, M. (1999) ‘Design of Group-Based Training Methods’, in Wilson, J.P.
(ed.), Human Resource Development, Kogan Page, London.
Beard, C. and Wilson, J.P. (2002) The Power of Experiential Learning: A Handbook for Trainers and
Educators, Kogan Page, London.
Beard, C. and Matzdorf, F. (2004) Space to Learn? Unwrapping Conversations about Physical Learning
Environments, Sheffield Hallam University.
Boud, D., Cohen, R. and Walker, D. (1993) Using Experience For Learning, Open University Press,
Buckingham.
Brant, L. (1998) ‘“Not Maslow again!” A study of the theories and models that trainers choose as
content on training courses’, MEd dissertation, University of Sheffield.
Bruner, J.S. (1990) Acts of Meaning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cornell, J. (1989) Sharing the Joy of Nature, Dawn Publications, Nevada City, CA.
Dainty, P. and Lucas, D. (1992) ‘Clarifying the confusion: A practical framework for evaluating
outdoor development programmes for managers’, Management Education and Development, Vol.
23 No. 2, pp. 106–22.
Dunn, R. and Dunn, K. (1978) Teaching Students Through their Individual Learning Styles: A Practical
Approach, Reston Publishing Co., Reston, VA.
Fineman, S. ‘Emotion and management learning’, Management Learning, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 13–25.
Gardner, H. (1983) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books Inc., New York.
Goleman, D. (1995) Emotional Intelligence: Why it can Matter More than IQ, Bantam, New York.
Jensen, E. (1995) Brain Based Learning—the New Science of Teaching and Training, The Brains Store
Publishing, San Diego, CA.
Light, G. and Cox, R. (2001) Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Reflective Professional,
Sage, London.
Mortiboys, A. (2002) The Emotionally Intelligent Lecturer, Staff and Educational Development
Association, SEDA Special 12, Birmingham.
Mortlock, C. (1984) The Adventure Alternative, Cicerone Press, Cumbria.
O’Connor, Joseph and Seymour, John (1995) Introducing Neuro-linguistic Programming: Psychological
Skills for Understanding and Influencing People, Thorsons, London.
Polanyi, M. (1967) The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, New York.
Salovey, Peter and Mayer, John D. (1990) ‘Emotional Intelligence’, Imagination, Cognition and
Personality, No. 9, pp. 185–211.
Smith, A. (1998) Accelerated Learning in Practice, Network Educational Press Ltd, Stafford.
Snyder, K. (2003) ‘Ropes, poles, and space—active learning in business education’, Active Learning
in Higher Education, Vol. 4 No. 2 (July), pp. 159–67.
Thayer, R. (1996) The Origin of Everyday Moods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16 COLIN BEARD AND JOHN P.WILSON
2
Learning through work-based learning
David Major
Introduction
In this chapter, I argue that, through work-based learning (WBL), learners appear to have a
much better understanding of the learning process than is gained through conventional
teaching methods. I will concentrate on the impact of the WBL experience, which is offered by
an increasing number of HE Colleges and Universities, defining WBL as fully accredited
negotiated units or programmes of learning through work, either for students in full-time
higher education or for full-time employees who are also part-time higher education students.
The evidence that underpins my argument comes from two main sources: empirical
research findings from studies carried out at University College Chester, and the findings of a
longitudinal study into student learning undertaken by Alverno College, Milwaukee. I shall
discuss how learning occurs through WBL, what is distinctive about it, and what the
conditions are under which learning through work comes about. Close attention will be given
to the notions of critical reflection and critical self-awareness as key features of learning
through work.
My main contention is that WBL requires learners to assume a greater degree of
responsibility for their own learning than do conventional learning methods. This greater
responsibility, together with critical reflection as a key ability in WBL, leads to learners
developing a greater understanding about how learning occurs. This ability to understand more
about the learning process while, at the same time, developing knowledge and understanding,
is one that is transferable to other, more conventional, learning contexts, if learners are made
more responsible for their own learning and if they learn how to critically self-reflect.
The key questions to be asked in this chapter concern how people learn through work and
what, if anything, is distinctive about WBL, and the conditions under which WBL occurs.
Anything of real merit that can be said in these contexts must, of course, be grounded in
empirical evidence and relatively little is available at the present time. Exceptions are Boud and
Solomon (2001) who include some WBL case studies, and Garrick’s (1998) enquiry into
informal learning in the workplace which is based on an empirical investigation. More
recently, articles such as Wrennal and Forbes (2002), and Dreuth and Dreuth-Fewell (2002)
have appeared. However, Tennant’s words still ring true: ‘research in understanding learning
in the workplace is still in its infancy’ (Boud and Garrick, 1999:177).
18 LEARNING THROUGH WORK-BASED LEARNING
These findings are corroborated by recent research carried out by the Centre for Work
Related Studies at University College Chester into the student experience of WBL. This
involved a structured questionnaire survey of full-time undergraduate students on
non-vocational degree programmes on completion of a six-week placement, and
semi-structured interviews involving 31 students, the majority of whom were in full-time
employment, undertaking WBL at either undergraduate or postgraduate levels.
I find theories really difficult to remember if I don’t see their practical application. On
the placement we mixed it in at the same time, the theory behind what we were doing,
and they both fitted together; they helped each other. They went hand in hand. You
know, ‘We are doing this because…and you need to do this because…’
Thus, effective learning may be best facilitated by a curriculum that presents learners with the
opportunity to become involved in the relationship between theory and practice, and not
where the two are regarded as being in some way separate from one another. A female
postgraduate in full-time employment noted:
I mean sometimes it is just by looking at the whole situation at work, seeing what’s
going on and then in your mind’s eye you’ve got all this theory and you can see people
behaving exactly as you have read about someone’s theory or personality or different
traits and you can see it exactly coming through in the workplace or outside the
workplace. So, it’s all a mixture really. It goes across the board. It’s more of an
unconventional learning in that sense, it’s not learning as in a school or college
environment, it’s more a learning in society such that you feed in one with another and
it doesn’t necessarily go from the book to the workplace, it could go from the
workplace back to the book.
20 LEARNING THROUGH WORK-BASED LEARNING
Thus, the model of WBL employed at University College Chester introduces students to
theoretical concepts (for example, concepts associated with learning styles, team roles, project
management, self management and development, and so on) which they are then asked to
reflect on in the light of the practical experience of the workplace. In addition, theories and
concepts drawn from academic subject knowledge (full-time undergraduates) and professional
knowledge (part-time undergraduates and postgraduates in employment) are similarly
reflected on in the context of their application in the workplace. Such engagement of theory
and practice almost inevitably results in new knowledge gains for the student, leading to the
development and enhancement of their knowledge in their academic or professional areas.
The strength of WBL, and a distinctive feature of it, may then be in its ability to
accommodate both theory and practice and, therefore, it may be an effective vehicle for a
higher education curriculum that recognises the importance for learning of the theory/practice
interplay. The Alverno research, as indicated above, shows that there is something about the
integration of knowledge and action that leads to effective learning. Barnett (Boud and
Garrick, 1999), from a theoretical perspective, would also appear to support the idea that
learning is a complex process and is not complete unless knowing and doing are combined
and, in turn, combined with reflective processes.
I’ve grown as a person which I wouldn’t have done unless I’d done this course because
I’ve been involved in so many multi-disciplinary groups working together with
a common aim really so it certainly has changed me…. Like it’s been a huge struggle I
can’t deny that but, from a personal point of view, it’s been great. In the year I’ve learnt
so much and, as I said before, I believe in myself and I’m much more confident now.
If this is the case, then it suggests that WBL is a powerful way of learning that engages the affective
domain as well as the cognitive and has the potential to bring about more holistic ways of being
and knowing than, arguably, is the case through more conventional forms of higher education
study. The place of emotions in the learning process is commented on by Garrick who claims
that, according to adult learning theory, ‘learning can be most effective if one’s emotions are
engaged in the learning process’ (Boud and Garrick, 1999:220). He points to the role of
emotion in learning found in the humanistic tradition and among those interested in emotional
DAVID MAJOR 21
intelligence. If WBL does, indeed, impact on the affective domain, as claimed by the
respondents, then this provides reinforcement to the idea that it is a much more holistic
approach to learning and, therefore, one could argue, better equips people to live and work in
the real world.
A note of caution, however, needs to be struck in that some, at least, of the subjects could
be considered to be highly impressionable. Full-time undergraduate students, new to a form of
experiential learning conducted in the workplace, frequently undergo a steep learning curve
during the course of the six weeks of the placement which makes quite an impression on them.
Usually, learning in this way is an entirely new experience for them and the experience of
change (from the lecture room to the workplace) can be stimulating, exciting and invigorating.
My past experience of talking with students during and shortly after their placements is that,
typically, they:
All of this can have quite an impact and create the impression of having had a unique
experience.
Another group of students, on whom WBL appeared to make a considerable impression,
consisted of a number of people in full-time employment who had not expected to ever engage
in HE level study (from the university perspective, this is a reminder of the potential of WBL
as an agent of widening participation). For them, an unanticipated opportunity had opened up.
Their discovery, that not only were they able to cope with this level of study but that some of
their professional competences were actually recognised as equating with higher education
level learning, proved to be highly motivational. Therefore, it is, perhaps, not surprising that a
typical response was that WBL had impacted on them hugely and in a very positive way in that
they now valued themselves more highly and recognised their capabilities and their
contribution in the workplace.
For both of these groups, what I shall refer to as the ‘novel factor’ of WBL should not be
underestimated or ignored. However, the evidence of the interviews also suggests that even
some of those not falling into either of the above categories recognised something of the
impact of WBL on them in terms of changed self-understanding and improved motivation. It
may, therefore, be the case that, while the novel factor may play a part in the impact on the
individual of the experience of WBL, it does not explain it in its entirety and there are other
factors involved. It is my contention that these other factors are concerned with the distinctive
features of WBL that cause the learner to engage in a wide variety of ways of learning within
the context of a community of practice.
the emergent notion of the learning organisation, work almost inevitably involves people in
various forms of collaboration and engages them in interpersonal relationships in a variety of
ways. The evidence from the Chester research seems to suggest that most students recognise
this and the opportunities it presents for learning in community and not in isolation. Thus,
they acknowledge that learning through work involves an awareness of interdependency,
mutuality and collaboration, giving WBL a strong relational dimension. This raises issues for
higher education, not least in terms of the way in which assessment of learning is undertaken.
It also contrasts quite starkly with the conventional culture of learning in higher education with
its emphasis on individualism and personal achievement.
The significance of the evidence, however, should not be over-stated, nor should the
differences between WBL and conventional higher education be polarised. There is no reason,
for example, why much learning on the university campus cannot be undertaken using more
collaborative methods (many university departments now like to refer to themselves as
learning communities) and sometimes learning in the workplace may be best achieved through
lone activity, such as reading a book or writing an article. However, it remains the case that a
distinctive feature of WBL is that, typically, it occurs within a community of practice, which
itself facilitates much of the learning that occurs and, therefore, places emphasis on the notion
of relational learning. Any form of collaborative learning implies that there are two principal
forms of learning occurring simultaneously: that is, (1) learning about the topic or subject
under consideration, and (2) learning about the others who are engaged in learning with you
which, in turn, almost inevitably leads to more self-learning.
I think I can see clearer. I think I saw things before but I tend to see the whole picture
of what’s going on, of the whole organisation, and not just from my one perspective.
I also try to see things from other perspectives and I don’t just believe what is reported
in the newspapers or on the television. I try to sit back and think and reflect and I try to
consider other people’s beliefs and consider what drives them to do the things that
they do.
Whereas critical thinking has always been highly prized in higher education, critical
reflection has been less so. Critical thinking implies a degree of detachment and objectivity in
relation to the object of (conceptual) thought, whereas critical reflection has a strong
subjective element that, of course, may account for its more cautious treatment in the
DAVID MAJOR 23
academic world. Critical reflection seems to me to carry with it the weight of critical thinking
but brings the self into the equation. Thus, in critical reflection there is an attempt to examine
the implications for the self (and, therefore, to make (construct) or to remake (reconstruct)
meaning for oneself) in relation to whatever it is that is under critical scrutiny. Critically
reflective capabilities are shown to be crucial to Barnett’s (1997) view of higher education
when he identifies three key features of the ‘critical being’ which, he argues, is the
responsibility of higher education to produce: namely, critical reasoning, critical self-reflection
and critical action. Barnett’s argument is that a university education should enable an
undergraduate to go beyond the capability of critical reasoning (which a conventional
university education has provided for and should continue to provide for), to engage in critical
self-reflection (leading to a reappraisal of beliefs and values), and to promote engagement in
critical action in the world (such as might be expected from a responsible citizen). I have
attempted to make the case elsewhere (Major, 2002) for WBL as a form of higher education
that has the capability to produce the ‘critical being’ that Barnett argues should be synonymous
with the concept of graduateness.
Critical reflection is the key capability of the reflective practitioner, is at the heart of the
model of praxis espoused in liberation thinking, and is considered by some to be a key aspect
of WBL methodology. However, critical reflection is not necessarily an intuitive process. It is
one that people have to learn, especially if they are to achieve a depth of reflection acceptable
to higher education. Thus, those responsible for delivering programmes of WBL must also be
charged with the responsibility for facilitating the development of students’ critically reflective
capabilities. That critical reflection is a capability that develops through learning and
experience is implied by one of the Chester postgraduate respondents who noticed that her
peers, who had undertaken WBL previously, possessed a greater understanding and insight
than she did concerning learning in the workplace. Similarly, two other postgraduate students,
who had undertaken WBL as part of their undergraduate studies, noted their own
development in their ability to critically reflect, suggesting that, to some extent, it is a learned
process.
• experiential learning
• conventional learning
24 LEARNING THROUGH WORK-BASED LEARNING
• instructional learning
• reflective learning
• relational learning
• other ways of learning.
The question was not in any sense meant to be about the physiological workings of the brain or
to engage in any form of psychological study but simply an attempt to find out about people’s
learning preferences and how, when free from the constraints of a more controlled learning
environment (such as the university or college), they went about their learning. It was more to
do with methods of learning and the idea that, through WBL, people probably engaged in a
wider variety of ways of learning than they would in a more conventional form of higher
education.
It seems reasonable to assume from the information given by the respondents that, when
free to do so, the way in which individuals go about learning is inclined to match their
preferred learning style. It also seems reasonable to assume, though the survey did not attempt
to deal with this, that access to a broad range of learning styles has the potential to lead to
more holistic ways of understanding learning and, thus, has the potential to lead to the
capability of learning to learn. The evidence does support the view that, whatever else
students learn through WBL, they also learn about themselves. This inevitably means that at
least an element of emotional learning is brought into the equation. Arguably, it is self-learning
that gives rise to an understanding of how one learns which, in turn, leads to a greater
awareness and understanding of the process of learning itself or of learning to learn.
If this is the case, then WBL is consistent with Carl Rogers’ (1983) holistic philosophy of
learning with its emphasis on people’s understanding of how they learn rather than what they
learn. This is a sophisticated process and one that many learners, I suspect, may never
contemplate. It is a process that a conventional university education may not require one to
consider. The difficulty some of the respondents had initially in engaging with a question that
asked them ‘how’ they learn suggests they may never have been asked that question before.
The fact that most were able to engage with it to some degree, having thought about it in the
context of WBL, suggests to me that having greater responsibility for their own learning,
together with experiencing a broader range of ways of learning, better equips people to
understand something of the learning process
Summary
In this chapter I have attempted to show that effective learning, in my view, is essentially a
holistic process that integrates knowing and doing in a critically reflective way and, moreover,
that WBL is a sound facilitator of learning of this quality. I have tried to say something about
how people learn through WBL (emphasising the theory/practice interplay, the role of critical
reflection, and the importance of collaborative learning), pointing to what I consider to be its
distinctive features (including the integration of knowledge and action as part of the learning
process, the foregrounding of learning about the self, the importance of accepting
responsibility for one’s own learning, and the experience of learning in more holistic ways) and
the conditions under which such learning occurs (including being part of a community of
practice, being exposed to a wide variety of ways of learning, and being prepared to regard work
DAVID MAJOR 25
as the curriculum). Through conversations with those engaged in WBL, it has become clear to
me that they appear to be more conscious of, and have a much better understanding of, the
learning process than might be brought about through more conventional forms of learning.
They appear to learn more about learning and develop the capacity of learning to learn. I have
argued that this comes about, partly at least, as a result of the greater responsibility for their
own learning that WBL places on the learners and that this, together with critical reflection as
a key capability, leads to them developing a greater understanding as to how learning occurs.
Boud and Symes may well be right when they say that, where work is the curriculum, as it is in
programmes of WBL, this provides ‘a radically new approach to what constitutes university
study’ (Symes and McIntyre, 2000:14). Radical though it may be, I hope to have shown that there
are sound educational reasons why the university should fully embrace WBL and accept it as a
legitimate contributor to the higher education curriculum.
References
Barnett, R. (1997) Higher Education: A Critical Business, Society for Research into Higher Education/
Open University Press, Buckingham.
Barnett, R. (1999) ‘Learning to Work and Working to Learn’, in Boud, D. and Garrick, J. (eds)
Understanding Learning at Work, Routledge, London.
Boud, D. and Garrick, J. (eds) (1999) Understanding Learning at Work, Routledge, London.
Boud, D. and Symes, D. (2000) ‘Learning for Real: Work Based Education in Universities’, in
Symes, D. and McIntyre, J. (eds) Working Knowledge: The New Vocationalism and Higher
Education, Society for Research into Higher Education/ Open University Press, Buckingham.
Boud, D. and Solomon, N. (eds) (2001) Work-Based Learning: A New Higher Education?, Society for
Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, Buckingham.
Dreuth, L. and Dreuth-Fewell, M. (2002) ‘A Model of Student Learning in Community Service
Field Placements: Voices from the Field’, Active Learning in Higher Edu cation, 3, 3, 251–264.
Garrick, J. (1998) Informal Learning in the Workplace, Routledge, London.
Garrick, J. (1999) ‘The Dominant Discourses of Learning at Work’, in Boud, D. and Garrick, J.
(eds) Understanding Learning at Work, Routledge, London.
Major, D. (2002) ‘A More Holistic Form of Higher Education: the Real Potential of Work-Based
Learning’, in Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, the Journal of the Institute for Access
Studies and the European Access Network, 4, 3, 26–34.
Mentkowski, M. and Associates (2000) Learning that Lasts, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Rogers, C. (1983) Freedom to Learn, Charles E.Merrill, New York.
Symes, D. and McIntyre, J. (eds) (2000) Working Knowledge: The New Vocationalism and Higher
Education, Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, Buckingham.
Tennant, M. (1999) ‘Is Learning Transferable?’, in Boud, D. and Garrick, J. (eds) Understanding
Learning at Work, Routledge, London.
Wrennall, M. and Forbes, D. (2002) ‘I Have Learned that Psychology is Linked to Almost
Everything We Do’, Psychology Teaching Review, 10, 1, 90–101.
26 LEARNING THROUGH WORK-BASED LEARNING
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
consoli formassero il minore consiglio, sempre adunato e sempre
attivo per reggere la città; e che negli affari di maggiore importanza
questi consoli intimassero una generale adunanza del popolo. Nel
1130 i consoli erano venti, ed erano stati eletti dalle tre classi di
cittadini, cioè dai capitani, i quali erano i nobili del primo ordine, dai
valvassori, che erano nobili bensì, ma di minore autorità, e dai
cittadini, che erano come il terzo ordine. Il numero dei consoli
cittadini era minore di quello di ciascuna delle altre due classi; onde
l'autorità realmente era presso i nobili [320], non rimanendo ai
cittadini poco più che l'apparenza, come in Roma, ne' comizi
centuriati. La repubblica di Milano però era ben piccola allora, poichè
la giurisdizione di lei si limitava a poco più della mera città; e la
campagna che le stava intorno, formava diversi altri piccoli Stati
indipendenti da lei, e così v'erano i conti del Seprio, i conti della
Martesana e altri distretti, che avevano un governo parziale e i loro
consoli [321]; di che rimasero sino al 1781 le vestigia nelle diverse
misure, che furono in uso in Monza, Lecco ed altri borghi del ducato,
abolite or ora. Questo è tutto quello che sappiamo intorno la
costituzione civile di Milano verso il principio del secolo duodecimo.
L'autorità suprema si riconosceva presso dell'imperatore, il di cui
nome incidevasi nelle monete, e dal quale ricevevano la giurisdizione
alcuni giudici e messi che decidevano le controversie dei privati [322].
Ma il governo politico, la pace e la guerra, l'imposizione e riscossione
de' tributi erano presso la città istessa. Landolfo il Giovine, parlando
dell'anno 1112, così si esprime: [323] Papienses et Mediolanenses
statuerunt et juraverunt sibi foedera, quae nimium quibusdam
videntur fuisse imperatoriae majestati, et apostolicae auctoritate
contraria; cum illi cives juraverent sibi servare se et sua contra
quemlibet mortalem hominem natum vel nasciturum; dal che pare
che, collegandosi per difendere le cose loro contro qualunque uomo,
tacitamente s'intendesse la disposizione di contrastare colla forza
all'imperatore, qualora cercasse di toglier loro o i nuovi magistrati, o
i tributi, o la giurisdizione che esercitavano. Nelle carte de' contratti,
testamenti, sentenze, ec., si soleva in prima porre il nome
dell'imperatore o re d'Italia: Regnante Domino nostro, il tale. Al
principio del secolo duodecimo non più si fece questa menzione. In
una parola la costituzione civile di Milano allora divenne, siccome
dissi, a un dipresso simile a quella d'una città libera dell'impero.
Quantunque l'arcivescovo di Milano Anselmo da Boisio fosse un
uomo di carattere assai mite, e quantunque dovesse interamente la
sua dignità al papa, cui era nella più esatta maniera sommesso; e
quantunque l'autorità politica del metropolitano fosse di molto
diminuita, ciò non ostante dava ombra al papa il nome
dell'arcivescovo di Milano: e per allontanare ogni pericolo e
confermarne la soggezione, piacque a Roma che l'arcivescovo
abbandonasse la sua diocesi, e, seguendo lo spirito delle Crociate al
principio del secolo duodecimo, si portasse a guerreggiare nell'Asia.
Gerusalemme era già in potere dei cristiani. Non sembrava che vi
rimanesse altro desiderio alla pietà dei fedeli, se non se quello di
custodirla. Ma, se crediamo allo storico nostro Landolfo il Giovine,
altra impresa si propose Anselmo da Boisio, e tale, che la gravità
della storia corre pericolo nel raccontarla, cioè la conquista del regno
di Babilonia. Eccone le parole dello storico: [324] Anselmus de Buis,
mediolanensis archiepiscopus, quasi monitus apostolica auctoritate,
studuit congregare de diversis partibus exercitum cum quo caperet
Babylonicum Regnum, et in hoc studio praemonuit praelectam
juventutem mediolanensem cruces suscipere, et cantilenam de
Ultreja, Ultreja cantare. Atque ad vocem hujusprudentis viri,
cuiuslibet conditionis per civitates Longobardorum, villas et castella
eorum cruces susceperunt, et eamdem cantilenam de Ultreja, Ultreja
cantaverunt [325]. Questa canzone latina inventata allora aveva la
frequente esclamazione Ultreja, che il conte Giulini crede, assai
verisimilmente, essere un composto di Eja! Ultra! come sarebbe
animo! avanti! eccitandosi così la gioventù lombarda a prendere le
armi e passare nell'Asia [326]. Che questa crociata milanese, avendo
alla testa l'arcivescovo Anselmo da Boisio, attraversasse l'Ungheria e
si portasse in Costantinopoli, dove poco dopo l'arcivescovo morì,
sembra cosa certa. Cosa poi facesse in quella comica impresa, è
difficile il definirlo, tanto sono discordi gli scrittori. Orderico Vitale,
scrittore di quei tempi, ci racconta che questo esercito si accostò
verso Gerusalemme, e in una battaglia verso Gandras fu malamente
battuto, onde i fuggitivi si ricoverarono a Costantinopoli; ma i
geografi non ci sanno dire in qual luogo trovisi questo Gandras.
Radolfo, che scrisse le imprese di Tancredi, sotto del quale militava,
ci lasciò scritto che l'arcivescovo Anselmo da Boisio fu battuto dai
Saraceni sotto Danisma; ma nemmeno Danisma si trova in nessuna
carta geografica. L'abate Uspergense invece c'insegna che la
battaglia seguì: [327] contra terram Coritianam, quae est Turcorum
patria; ma nemmeno questa terra è conosciuta nella geografia; e la
patria de' Turchi, se crediamo a Pomponio Mela ed a Plinio, è nei
contorni delle paludi Meotidi, ovvero fra l'Eusino e il Caspio, nelle
vicinanze del Caucaso; parti del mondo assai sviate per coloro che
dalla Lombardia cercavano di passare in Babilonia o nella Terra
Santa. Guglielmo Tirio, che è riputato il più sicuro scrittore di quelle
guerre di Terra Santa, non fa menzione alcuna della spedizione
dell'arcivescovo di Milano Anselmo, nè delle disgrazie del suo
esercito. L'arcivescovo morì in Costantinopoli l'anno 1110, e Landolfo
il Giovine ce ne indica la malattia; ei morì di tristezza. Questo buon
Anselmo da Boisio ce lo qualifica Landolfo il Giovine per un povero
uomo, semplice, timido, e ironicamente lo chiama nel testo riferito:
[328] ad vocem hujus prudentis viri. Probabilmente a queste
disposizioni del di lui animo egli doveva la sua dignità. Questo
moderatissimo prelato, se per il merito dell'obbedienza aveva
animato i suoi a prendere le armi per combattere gli infedeli; poichè
si vide affaticato da un assai lungo viaggio; trasportato in mezzo a
popoli dei quali ignorava il costume e il linguaggio; abbandonato alla
licenza militare di giovani incautamente espatriati per di lui consiglio,
e inquieti per trovare mezzi da sussistere; in mezzo ai pericoli; senza
forza d'animo e senza aiuto; mi sembra naturale ch'ei morisse
d'affanno e di melanconia, e che si sbandassero i suoi, e ritornassero
alla patria gli altri pochi rimasti, cui riuscì di trovare la strada ed i
mezzi per rivederla. Coloro che rimproverano alla generazione
vivente d'avere minor senno di quello che si osservava altre volte,
esaminino queste epoche.
Nel principio appunto del secolo duodecimo lo storico nostro
Landolfo Juniore, che è il solo autore contemporaneo, ci racconta un
fatto prodigiosissimo; e ce lo descrive con circostanze cotanto
minute e singolari, che sembra quasi ch'ei temesse l'incredulità nei
posteri. Sinora il suo timore fu vano; ma io lo credo giustissimo. Il
fatto è il seguente. Mentre Anselmo da Boisio era partito,
comandando l'esercito che marciava alla conquista di Babilonia, il
vescovo di Savona Grossolano, come vicario dell'assente arcivescovo,
reggeva la chiesa milanese. Giunta la nuova della morte di Anselmo,
Grossolano ebbe un partito, e fu eletto arcivescovo; e dal papa fugli
spedito il pallio, che il portatore, tenendo a guisa di stendardo, in
cima del bastone, andava gridando: ecco la stola, o come dice
Landolfo il Giovine: heccum la stola, heccum la stola [329]; dal che
vedesi che anche allora si parlava una lingua simile a quella che
oggidì si parla. Eravi in Milano un prete che aveva nome Liprando.
Egli era zio di Landolfo Juniore, e convien dire che fosse di genio
piuttosto attivo, poichè ebbe tagliati il naso e gli orecchi in uno de'
tumulti per la giurisdizione romana, per cui egli combatteva. Il papa
Gregorio VII prese questo prete sotto la speciale protezione della
Santa Sede, e nella bolla gli scrisse: [330] Tu quoque, abscisso naso,
et auribus pro Christi nomine, laudabilior es qui ad eam gratiam
pertingere meruisti, quae ab omnibus desideranda est, qua a sanctis,
si persevereraveris in finem, non discrepas. Integritas quidem
corporis tui diminuta est, sed interior homo, qui renovatur de die in
diem, magnum sanctitatis suscepit incrementum: forma visibilis
turpior, sed imago Dei, quae est forma justitiae, facta est pulchrior.
Unde in Canticis Canticorum gloriatur Ecclesia, dicens: nigra sum,
filiae Hierusalem; e poi dopo lo chiama [331] martyr Christi [332]. Il
prete Liprando era titolare della chiesa di San Paolo in Compito.
Appoggiato a questa bolla, pretendeva di essere indipendente
dall'arcivescovo, e da ciò nacquero dei dissapori, i quali s'inasprirono.
L'arcivescovo sospese il prete dal suo ufficio sacerdotale, e il prete
accusò pubblicamente l'arcivescovo di simonia, [333] per munus a
manu, per munus a lingua, per munus ab ubsequio [334]. La disputa
andò tanto avanti, che vi furono partiti; si venne alle solite zuffe,
e [335] Grossolani turba, dimicans adversus primicerium,
Landulphum, ejusdem primicerii clericum lapide occidit [336]. Fu
perciò costretto l'arcivescovo Grossolano a convocare un sinodo, in
cui si giudicasse s'egli fosse legittimamente eletto, ovvero se fosse
simoniaco; e il prete Liprando si esibì di provare col giudizio di Dio,
passando attraverso del fuoco, l'accusa che aveva fatta
all'arcivescovo. Il popolo accettò con avidità questa proposizione,
che gli offeriva un genere di spettacolo maravigliosissimo. La
curiosità di vedere un miracolo generalmente eccitò l'impazienza di
ognuno; e fu avvisato il prete Liprando di apparecchiarvisi: e il fatto
ce lo descrive Landolfo nella maniera che dirò. Distribuì il prete
Liprando in elemosina il grano ed il vino che possedeva; fece
testamento, lasciando erede lo storico suo nipote; e dispose che se
egli morisse nel giudizio, quel che le fiamme avessero lasciato del
suo corpo, venisse seppellito nella chiesa della Trinità. Sia ch'ei
temesse falsa la simonia asserita, ovvero non sicuro il miracolo, egli
credette possibile il rimanervi abbruciato, sebbene con tanta fiducia
ne cercasse l'occasione. Digiunò il prete due giorni; poi, vestito con
cilicio, camice e pianeta, a piedi nudi, portando la croce, da San
Paolo in Compito venne a Sant'Ambrogio, e cantò la messa all'altar
maggiore in faccia all'arcivescovo, che si era collocato sul pulpito con
altri due personaggi. Forse in que' tempi il digiuno naturale, prima
d'accostarsi all'altare, non era un precetto; almeno, nel secolo nono,
la imperatrice Ermengarda, [337] ante introitum missarum fatebatur
se exardescere siti, et bibit plenam phialam vini peregrini, et post
haec, coelestem participavit mensam [338]. Comunque sia di ciò,
Landolfo non dice come celebrasse la messa quel prete sospeso dal
suo ufficio: ci dice però che l'arcivescovo, poichè la messa fu
terminata, prese a dire così: Aspettate, che con tre parole
convincerò quest'uomo; indi, rivolto al prete: Hai asserito, gli disse,
che io sono simoniaco, ora dichiara soltanto, se il puoi, qual sia la
persona a cui io abbia donato. Il prete si collocò sopra un sasso
elevato che era nella chiesa, e indicando il pulpito: Vedete, disse al
popolo, vedete tre grandissimi diavoli, che possono confondermi col
loro ingegno e coi denari che possedono; ma io rispondo che con
quel danaro istesso che il diavolo gli suggerì di adoprare per
comprarsi l'arcivescovato, possono aver occultata la verità e togliermi
i testimonii; e per ciò ho scelto il giudizio di Dio, che non s'inganna.
Il dialogo continuò qualche poco, sin tanto che, impaziente il popolo
di vedere questo prodigio, si udì gridare perchè venisse al cimento il
prete; il quale, sebbene fosse vecchio, e digiuno per il terzo giorno,
ed avesse fatto un lungo cammino, balzò dal sasso e si portò co' suoi
paramenti avanti l'atrio di Sant'Ambrogio; fuori del quale erano
disposte due cataste di legna di quercia, ciascuna delle quali era
lunga dieci braccia, alte entrambi più di un uomo, e similmente
larghi, e distanti l'una dall'altra un braccio e mezzo. Anzi nel viottolo
istesso eranvi gettati dei pezzi di legna tratto tratto, per renderne più
lento e difficile il passaggio. Poichè il prete e l'arcivescovo furono
fuori dell'atrio, l'accusatore prese l'arcivescovo per la cappa e disse:
[339] Iste Grossulanus, qui est sub ista cappa, et non de alio dico,
est simoniacus de archiepiscopatu Mediolani [340]. Ciò fatto,
l'arcivescovo non volle star più presente, montò a cavallo, e se ne
partì. Arialdo da Meregnano, amico dell'arcivescovo, teneva frattanto
il prete, acciocchè ei non passasse, sin tanto che il fuoco non fosse
bene acceso; e il fuoco crebbe a segno, che Arialdo ne ebbe offesa
la mano. Allora dissegli: Prete Liprando, mira la tua morte, piegati
all'arcivescovo e salva la vita; e se nol vuoi, vanne colla maledizione
di Dio. Il prete rispose a lui: [341] Sathana, retro vade, poi si prostrò
a terra, fece il segno della croce, ed entrò fra le cataste ardenti. La
fiamma si spaccava avanti di lui, e si riuniva tosto che era passato;
passò sopra i carboni, come se fosse arena, due volle recitò in quel
passaggio: [342] Deus, in nomine tuo salvum me fac, ed in virtute tua
libera me, e nella terza volta, alla parola fac, si trovò sano dall'altra
parte del fuoco, senza danno alcuno nella persona, o nei lini del
camice, o nella pianeta. Così il nipote Landolfo ci racconta il fatto.
Questo fatto, riferitoci dal solo Landolfo, e adottato poscia da chi
scrisse dopo di lui, ha tanta somiglianza con quello che Desiderio,
abate di Monte Cassino, asserisce accaduto in Firenze, che non si
potrebbe giudicare quale dei due fosse l'originale e quale la copia; se
quello di Toscana non fosse stato collocato quarant'anni prima di
questo di Landolfo, che si colloca nell'anno 1103. A Firenze si
accusava quel vescovo di simonia: si propose di provarlo colla prova
del fuoco; si prepararono due cataste lunghe dieci piedi, alte e
larghe cinque, distanti appunto un piede e mezzo. Le misure sono le
medesime nel numero, sebbene da noi non erano piedi, ma braccia.
Ivi passò illeso un monaco Giovanni Aldobrandino, che fu poi
chiamato Giovanni Igneo: e l'uno e l'altro fatto si dice accaduto in
quaresima. Costretto a rinunziare alla fede di uno storico
contemporaneo, ovvero al buon senso, io abjurerò la prima: nè
crederò che la novità abbia operato un portento per approvare una
temerità solennemente riprovata dalla Chiesa in più concilii. Dopo un
fatto cotanto decisivo, non sarebbe stato possibile che i vescovi
suffraganei, che erano in Milano pel sinodo, non conoscessero la
mano di Dio, e non concorressero a deporre l'arcivescovo. Eppure lo
stesso Landolfo ci avvisa che: [343] praesentia episcoporum
suffraganeorum huic legi et triumpho favorem integre non
praebuit [344], e il popolo istesso, pochi giorni dopo, cambiossi di
parere sul preteso miracoloso passaggio: [345] turba tristis de casu et
ruina Grossulani, in presbyterum, et ejus legem post paucos dies
scandalizavit. Ci narra di più lo stesso autore che in quella occasione
il prete ebbe offesa bensì una mano dal fuoco, ma che se l'abbruciò
prima di passarvi; che ebbe anche male a un piede, ma che ne fu
cagione un cavallo da cui fu calpestato. La verità sola che oggi
possiamo sapere è, che il fatto, come ce lo racconta Landolfo, non è
vero. Se qualche fatto simile vi è stato, conviene allargare il viottolo,
abbassare e sminuire le cataste, supporre il prete che passi prima di
una perfetta accensione; e allora con una mano ed un piede offesi
potremo accordare i due fenomeni, il fisico ed il morale. Se poi il
racconto fosse imitato da Landolfo dall'altra favola toscana, per
vanità di raccontare cose prodigiose, e per farsi nipote di un
taumaturgo, allora ne sarebbe ancora più semplice la spiegazione.
Nè sarà questa un'accusa troppo severa che noi faremo all'ingenuità
di questo storico, il quale ci vuol far credere che un angelo sia
venuto ad avvertirlo che il di lui zio Liprando era ammalato: [346] Mihi
angelus occurrit dicens: presbyter Liprandus, rediens a Valtellina,
infirmus jacet ad monasterium de Clivate [347]: asserzione sul
proposito della quale saggiamente riflette il nostro conte Giulini, che
«sarebbe stato desiderabile che lo storico ci avesse additato i segni
pe' quali egli s'avvide con tanta sicurezza, che quello era un
angelo [348]». Tutti i nostri autori però, ciecamente appoggiati
all'asserzione del solo Landolfo, hanno creduto vero un tal prodigio;
e nemmeno il nostro conte Giulini si è voluto segregare. Sarebbe
stato veramente desiderabile che avessero seguita l'opinione
piuttosto dei vescovi suffraganei e della plebe, che ne fu spettatrice.
Ma il meraviglioso seduce; non si ha coraggio di affrontare una lunga
tradizione per annunciare la verità, i di cui dritti non si prescrivono
giammai; ed è costretta la storia a raccontare di tali inezie, qualora
sieno generalmente credute.
Per otto anni ancora, dopo il raccontato prodigio, continuò
l'arcivescovo Grossolano a conservare la sua dignità, sebbene con un
partito contrario. Il papa lo considerò arcivescovo legittimo, e non
cessò d'esserlo, se non quando, portatosi egli, nel 1111, a
Costantinopoli, se gli elesse in Milano un successore. Morì frattanto
in Germania l'infelice imperatore Enrico III; ciò avvenne l'anno 1106.
Corrado, di lui figlio, se gli era ribellato, siccome dissi, adescato da
una vana lusinga di essere re d'Italia, ove visse con questo titolo per
obbedire a tutti i cenni della contessa Matilde. Anche l'altro figlio
Enrico si trovò modo di farlo ribelle al padre. Non si può rinunziare ai
sentimenti dell'umanità e della natura più freddamente di quello che
fece questo figlio Enrico, che il padre aveva già fatto suo collega nel
regno di Germania. Io ne racconterò l'avvenimento colle parole
istesse colle quali il conte Giulini lo riferisce. «I vizi, le
scostumatezze, la simonia, lo scisma dell'imperatore erano
veramente cose orribili a chi le considerava; ma pure dovevano con
pazienza tollerarsi da un suddito, e molto più da un figliuolo. Per
quanto la storia della vita di Enrico IV, re di Germania, e terzo
imperatore e re d'Italia, desti odio ed abborrimento contro dì lui,
quella della sua morte non lascia di muovere gli animi a compassione
e pietà. Altro io non dirò, se non che il misero principe, spogliato a
forza de' reali ornamenti, pentito de' commessi delitti senza poter
ottenere dal legato apostolico la desiderata assoluzione, prosteso a'
piè del figlio senza poter ottenere da lui un solo sguardo, finalmente
da disperato diede nuovamente di piglio alle armi; ma abbandonato
presso che da tutti, e giunto alle ultime angustie, alli sette di agosto
del corrente anno 1106 terminò in Liegi di puro cordoglio la vita.
Così castigò Iddio i suoi delitti in vita» [349]. I delitti di questo
principe sono di non aver voluto rinunziare alle investiture de'
vescovi, che avevano goduto i suoi antecessori. Le sue buone qualità
furono la generosità, la giustizia e il valore. Non rapì l'altrui, non
insidiò alcuno, non se gli rimprovera alcuna crudeltà. Egli comandava
in persona la sua armata; si trovò in sessantasei battaglie, e le vinse
tutte, eccetto quelle nelle quali fu tradito. Il di lui figlio Enrico, che
poi fu il quarto imperatore di questo nome, venne in Italia nel 1110;
pretese dalle città lombarde l'antica obbedienza; trovò degli ostacoli,
poichè erano già avvezze a reggersi da sè. Novara, fra le altre, non
fu docile, e il re Enrico la incendiò; così fece a varie altre castella e
terre. L'infelice Enrico suo padre non adoperò il fuoco per
sottomettere i popoli. Questa feroce maniera di guerreggiare mosse
le altre città a cercare di guadagnarselo con denaro, con vasi d'oro e
d'argento; ma la popolata e nobile città di Milano non gli fece regalo
alcuno, nè in verun conto gli badò, come ci attesta il monaco
Donizzone, che in quei tempi scriveva le gesta della contessa Matilde
con versi assai meschini:
Pareva che allora Milano ergesse già la testa sopra delle altre città
del regno italico. Prestarono però i Milanesi assistenza ad Enrico,
piuttosto come alleati, che come sudditi; e questa fu di molti armati
che lo accompagnarono a Roma per ricevervi la corona imperiale. È
noto che Pasquale II, papa, pretese, prima d'incoronarlo, che
rinunziasse al diritto di dare l'investitura ai vescovi. Ricusò Enrico di
rinunziarvi, e pretese, non meno di quello che aveva fatto suo padre,
di conservare questa ragione, posseduta dai precedenti augusti.
Insisteva il papa; nacque in Roma una zuffa: i Lombardi, uniti coi
Tedeschi, frenarono l'impeto de' pontificii, a segno che Enrico fece
suo prigioniero il papa, lo condusse fuori di Roma, nè gli accordò la
libertà, se non quando gli promise con solenne scrittura di lasciargli
le investiture come per lo passato. Ciò fatto, ei lo pose in libertà, e
da esso fu incoronato imperatore nella basilica Vaticana, il giorno 13
di aprile 1111. Per questa zuffa ne dovettero soffrire anche i
Milanesi, de' quali varii ne perirono, e fra gli altri Ottone Visconti:
[352] Otho autem mediolanensis Vicecomes, cum multis
pugnatoribus ejusdem regis, in ipsa strage corruit in mortem
amarissimam hominibus diligentibus civitatem mediolanensem, et
Ecclesiam [353]. Questo Ottone è forse lo stesso reso immortale dai
due versi del Tasso:
ebookgate.com