Nba Sar Tier-1 C2
Nba Sar Tier-1 C2
Criterion-2
2.1 Describe Processes Followed to Ensure Quality of Teaching & Learning (20)
Figure 2.1 Teaching Learning Process
TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS
ACADEMIC CALENDAR
PERFORMANCE METRICS
COURSE DELIVERY
Case Study
Number of Students /Games/Group
Participated Discussions
CLASS ROOM TEACHING LABORATORY
EXPERIMENTS Test Scores
STANDARD CO CURRICULAR
SMART CLASS GPA/CGPA ACTIVITIES
PROGRAMS
ROOM
ADDITIONAL
FLIPPED CLASS
EXERCISES
ROOM
MINI / MICRO TRAINING /
E - LEARNING PROJECTS SLOW LEARNER FAST LEARNER INTERNSHIPS
INDUSTRY USECASES
CHALK AND TALK
Remedial classes Academic Reward
Peer Learning Tech Events
PROTOTYPE MODEL
approach, aiming to provide students with a comprehensive, engaging, and practical education.
student support, the department ensures a well-rounded learning experience. The focus is on
fostering both theoretical understanding and practical skills, preparing students for success in
• The department calendar is prepared semester wise before the commencement of each
semester, aligning with the college academic calendar.
• The head of the institution formulates the academic calendar after discussion with
department heads.
• The academic calendar ensures that course delivery, assessments, student support
activities, co-curricular and extracurricular activities are properly planned and
conducted as scheduled.
2
Assessment
Student support
Students are supported through case studies, project-based learning, cocurricular activities,
Collaborative learning, Internship, Self learning, and other experiential methods to enhance
their practical skills and deepen their understanding of programming concepts.
3
All the co-curricular and extra-curricular activates are planned in the academic
calendar.
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 2
Figure No.2.1.b: Academic Calendar 2023-24 Even Semester – III Year
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 3
Figure No.2.1.c: Academic Calendar 2023-24 Even Semester – IV Year
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 4
Table No.2.1.1: 2023-24 - Even Semester Planned activity
JANUARY'2024
Date Day Particulars
1 Mon
2 Tue Commencement of Classes (III & IV Year)
3 Wed
4 Thu
5 Fri
6 Sat
7 Sun Holiday
8 Mon
9 Tue
10 Wed
Class Committee Meeting –I (III & IV Year)
11 Thu
Inter Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting
12 Fri
13 Sat
14 Sun Monthly Holidays
15 Mon Monthly Holidays
16 Tue Monthly Holidays
17 Wed Monthly Holidays
18 Thu
19 Fri
20 Sat
21 Sun Holiday
22 Mon
23 Tue
24 Wed
25 Thu Monthly Holidays
26 Fri Republic day
27 Sat Monthly Holidays
28 Sun Monthly Holidays
29 Mon
30 Tue
31 Wed
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 5
FEBRUARY'2024
Date Day Particulars
1 Thu Inter Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting
2 Fri Submission of Log books\Course Files (III & IV Year)
Submission of Question Paper- Internal Assessment – I (III & IV Year)
3 Sat
Association Activities - Seminar/Workshop
4 Sun Holiday
5 Mon Submission of Students Counselling –I Reports (III & IV Year)
6 Tue
7 Wed Internal Assessment – I Examination ( III & IV Year)
8 Thu Internal Assessment – I Examination ( III & IV Year)
9 Fri Internal Assessment – I Examination (III & IV Year)
10 Sat Internal Assessment – I Examination (III Year)
11 Sun Holiday
Internal Assessment – I Examination (III Year)
12 Mon Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment - I ( IV Year)
Last Date for Letter to Parents- Internal Assessment - I ( IV Year)
13 Tue Internal Assessment – I Examination (III Year)
14 Wed
Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment - I (III Year)
Last Date for Letter to Parents- Internal Assessment - I (III Year)
15 Thu
Commencement of Classes (II Year)
Inter Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting
16 Fri
17 Sat
18 Sun Holiday
19 Mon Class Committee Meeting – II (III & IV Year)
20 Tue
21 Wed
22 Thu Class Committee Meeting –I (II Year)
23 Fri
24 Sat Technical Symposium
25 Sun Holiday
26 Mon
27 Tue
28 Wed
29 Thu Inter Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 6
MARCH'2024
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 7
APRIL'2024
Date Day Particulars
1 Mon Internal Assessment-II Examination – (III Year )
2 Tue Internal Assessment-II Examination – (III Year )
Internal Assessment-II Examination – (III Year )
3 Wed
Commencement of End Semester Examination-Project Viva voce (IV Year)
4 Thu Internal Assessment-II Examination – (III Year )
Internal Assessment-II Examination – (III Year )
5 Fri
Submission of Log books\Course Files (IV Year)
Internal Assessment-II Examination – (III Year )
6 Sat Submission of Log Books / Course Files (II Year)
National Conference
7 Sun Holiday
Commencement of End Semester Examination-Theory (IV Year)
8 Mon
Coaching and Internal Assessment – III Examination (III Year)
Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment – II ( III Year)
9 Tue
Last Date for Letter to Parents – Internal Assessment – II ( III Year)
10 Wed Submission of Log books\Course Files (III Year)
11 Thu
12 Fri Class Committee Meeting – III (III Year)
13 Sat
14 Sun Holiday
15 Mon
16 Tue
17 Wed
18 Thu
19 Fri
20 Sat Class Committee Meeting – II ( II Year )
21 Sun Holiday
22 Mon
23 Tue
24 Wed
25 Thu Inter Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting
26 Fri
27 Sat
28 Sun Monthly Holidays
29 Mon Monthly Holidays
30 Tue Monthly Holidays
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 8
MAY'2024
Date Day Particulars
1 Wed Mayday - Holiday
Submission of Log books\Course Files (III Year)
Commencement of End Semester Examination-Practical (III Year)
2 Thu
Submission of Students Counselling – II Reports (II Year)
Inter Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting
3 Fri
4 Sat Association Activities - Seminar
5 Sun Holiday
Submission of Log Books / Course Files (II Year )
6 Mon
Submission of Question Paper- Internal Assessment – II (II Year)
7 Tue
8 Wed Last Date for completion of Practical’s Record Notes ( II Year)
Commencement of End Semester Examination-Theory (III Year)
9 Thu
Internal Assessment – II Examination (II Year)
Internal Assessment – II Examination (II Year)
10 Fri
Professional Society Activities
11 Sat Internal Assessment – II Examination (II Year)
12 Sun Holiday
13 Mon Internal Assessment – II Examination (II Year)
14 Tue Internal Assessment – II Examination (II Year)
15 Wed Internal Assessment – II Examination (II Year)
16 Thu Commencement of Coaching (II Year)
17 Fri Class Committee Meeting – III (II Year)
Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment - II (II Year)
18 Sat
Last Date for Letter to Parents- Internal Assessment - II (II Year)
19 Sun Holiday
20 Mon
21 Tue
22 Wed
23 Thu
24 Fri
25 Sat
26 Sun Holiday
27 Mon
28 Tue
29 Wed
30 Thu
31 Fri
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 9
JUNE'2024
Date Day Particulars
1 Sat Monthly Holidays
2 Sun Monthly Holidays
3 Mon Monthly Holidays
Submission of Log Books / Course Files ( II Year)
4 Tue
Commencement of End Semester Examination (II Year)
5 Wed
6 Thu
7 Fri
8 Sat
9 Sun Holiday
10 Mon
11 Tue
12 Wed
13 Thu
14 Fri
15 Sat
16 Sun Holiday
17 Mon
18 Tue
19 Wed
20 Thu
21 Fri
22 Sat
23 Sun Holiday
24 Mon
25 Tue
26 Wed
27 Thu
28 Fri
29 Sat
30 Sun Holiday
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 10
Table No.2.1.2: 2023-24 - Even Semester Adherence table
Reason for
Planned Adhered/
S.No Planned Activity Postponement/
Date Not Adhered
Adhered date
1. 02.01.2024 Commencement of Classes (III , IV Year) Adhered -
2. 11.01.2024 Class Committee Meeting –I (III , IV Year) Adhered -
3. 11.01.2024 Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting Adhered -
14.01.2024
4. to Monthly Holidays Adhered -
17.01.2024
25.01.2024
5. to Monthly Holidays Adhered -
28.01.2024
6. 01.02.2024 Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting Adhered -
7. 02.02.2024 Submission of Log books\Course Files (III, IV Year) Adhered -
Submission of Question Paper- Internal Assessment – I
8. 03.02.2024 Adhered -
(III, IV Year)
9. 03.02.2024 Association activities – Seminar Adhered -
Submission of Students Counselling –I Reports
10. 05.02.2024 Adhered -
(III, IV Year)
07.02.2024
11. to Internal Assessment – I Examination (IV Year) Adhered -
09.02.2024
07.02.2024
12. to Internal Assessment – I Examination (III Year) Adhered -
13.02.2024
Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment - I
13. Adhered -
(IV Year)
12.02.2024
Last Date for Letter to Parents- Internal Assessment - I
14. Adhered -
(IV Year)
Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment - I
15. Adhered -
(III Year)
15.02.2024
Last Date for Letter to Parents- Internal Assessment - I
16. Adhered -
(III Year)
17. 15.02.2024 Commencement of Classes (II Year) Adhered -
18. 15.02.2024 Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting Adhered -
19. 19.02.2024 Class Committee Meeting – II (III , IV Year) Adhered -
20. 22.02.2024 Class Committee Meeting –I (II Year) Adhered -
21. 24.02.2024 Technical Symposium Adhered -
22. 29.02.2024 Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting Adhered -
23. Submission of Students Counselling – II Reports (IV Year) Adhered -
01.03.2024 Submission of Question Paper – Internal Assessment – II
24. Adhered -
(IV Year)
03.03.2024
25. to Monthly Holidays Adhered -
05.03.2024
26. 06.03.2024 Submission of Log books\Course Files (II Year) Adhered -
27. 07.03.2024 Submission of Log books\Course Files (III, IV Year) Adhered -
28. 07.03.2024 Internal Assessment-II Examination (IV Year ) Adhered -
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 11
to
09.03.2024
29. 11.03.2024 Class Committee Meeting – III (IV Year) Adhered -
Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment – II
30. Adhered -
(IV Year)
12.03.2024
Last Date for Letter to Parents – Internal Assessment – II
31. Adhered -
(IV Year)
Submission of Question Paper - Internal Assessment – I
32. 13.03.2024 Adhered -
(II Year)
33. 14.03.2024 Submission of Students Counselling–I Reports (II Year) Adhered -
34. 14.03.2024 Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting Adhered -
35. 14.03.2024 Professional society - IETE Activities Adhered -
36. 16.03.2024 Association activities – Seminar Adhered -
16.03.2024
37. to Internal Assessment – I Examination (II Year) Adhered -
22.03.2024
38. 18.03.2024 Submission of Project Reports (IV Year) Adhered -
Due to late
coverage of
syllabus,
Coaching and Internal Assessment – III Examination Not Coaching exam
39. 21.03.2024
(IV Year) Adhered adhered from
25.03.2024 &
IA-III adhered
from 02.04.2024
40. 22.03.2024 Association activities – Seminar Adhered -
Last Date for completion of Practical’s Record Notes
41. 23.03.2024 Adhered -
(III Year)
42. 25.03.2024 Submission of Students Counselling –II Reports (III Year) Adhered -
43. 26.03.2024 Professional Society - ISTE Activities Adhered -
Submission of Question Paper - Internal Assessment – II
44. 26.03.2024 Adhered -
(III Year)
Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment – I
45. Adhered -
(II Year)
26.03.2024
Last Date For Letter to Parents- Internal Assessment - I
46. Adhered -
(II Year)
47. 27.03.2024 Submission of Log books\Course Files (IV Year) Adhered -
48. 28.03.2024 Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting Adhered -
29.03.2024
49. to Monthly Holidays Adhered -
31.03.2024
01.04.2024
50. to Internal Assessment-II Examination – (III Year) Adhered -
06.04.2024
Due to late
approval from
Commencement of End Semester Examination-Project
51. 03.04.2024 Not Adhered university /
Viva voce (IV Year)
Adhered on
10.04.2024
52. 05.04.2024 Submission of Log books\Course Files (IV Year) Adhered -
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 12
53. 06.04.2024 Submission of Log Books / Course Files (II Year) Adhered -
54. 06.04.2024 National Conference Adhered -
Due to late
approval from
Commencement of End Semester Examination-Theory
55. 08.04.2024 Not Adhered university /
(IV Year)
Adhered on
14.05.2024
Coaching and Internal Assessment – III Examination
56. 08.04.2024 Adhered -
(III Year)
Submission of Result Analysis of Internal Assessment – II
57. Adhered -
( III Year)
09.04.2024
Last Date for Letter to Parents – Internal Assessment – II
58. Adhered -
(III Year)
59. 10.04.2024 Submission of Log books\Course Files (III Year) Adhered -
60. 12.04.2024 Class Committee Meeting – III (III Year) Adhered -
Due to Lok
Not Sabha Election/
61. 20.04.2024 Class Committee Meeting – II (II Year )
Adhered Adhered on
22.04.2024
Resource person
Not Unavailability /
62. 20.04.2024 Professional Society-IETE Activities
Adhered Adhered on
04.05.2024
63. 25.04.2024 Inter Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting Adhered
28.04.2024
64. to Monthly Holidays Adhered -
01.05.2024
65. 02.05.2024 Faculty Seminar and Department Meeting Adhered -
66. Submission of Log books\Course Files (III Year) Adhered -
02.05.2024 Commencement of End Semester Examination-Practical
67. Adhered -
(III Year)
68. 02.05.2024 Submission of Students Counselling – II Reports (II Year) Adhered -
69. 04.05.2024 Association activities - Seminar Adhered -
70. Submission of Log Books / Course Files (II Year ) Adhered -
06.05.2024 Submission of Question Paper- Internal Assessment – II
71. Adhered -
(II Year)
Last Date for Completion of Practical’s Record Notes
72. 08.05.2024 Adhered -
(II Year)
Due to lok Sabha
Commencement of End Semester Examination - Theory Not election /
73. 09.05.2024
(III Year) Adhered Adhered on
18.05.2024
Due to lok
Sabha election /
09.05.2024
Not Adhered from
74. to Internal Assessment – II Examination (II Year)
Adhered 13.05.2024
15.05.2024
to
18.05.2024
75. 10.05.2024 Professional Society Activities - ISTE Adhered -
Not Due to lok Sabha
76. 16.05.2024 Commencement of Coaching (II Year)
Adhered election /
KNCET/ECE/NBA/SAR-2024 13
2.1.2 Various Instruction Methods and Pedagogical Initiatives
Innovative practices are essential to improving the quality of education. Our department is
pedagogical methods for effective teaching learning process. Figure 2.1.2.1 illustrates some
of the pedagogical initiatives which are followed in the department. A well-defined process
for course allotment and load distribution is adopted at the department level.
Active Learning
Methods
PEDAGOGIES
CO – PO/PSO
Technology
enhanced learning Adaptive Learning
E-Learning
Experiential and
hands on training
Project based learning
Prototype Model
8
2.1.2.1 Some effective strategies tailored to meet students' needs include:
9
iii) Technology enhanced learning:
10
v) Alternative Assessment Methods
11
2.1.2.2 Evaluation of Continuous Assessment: Assignments, Unit Tests, Mid-Term, etc.
For all theory and practical courses including project work, the continuous assessment and
the Semester End Exam (SEE) weightage will be as follows:
Table 2.1.1 Evaluation scheme for the courses
Course type Mode of examination Weightage
Theory courses Continuous Assessment 40
Semester End Exam (SEE) 60
Laboratory courses Continuous Assessment 60
Semester End Exam (SEE) 40
Theory courses with Continuous Assessment 50
Laboratory component Semester End Exam (SEE) 50
Project work Continuous Assessment 60
Semester End Exam (SEE) 40
Continuous Assessment:
Continuous assessment is an ongoing evaluation method used to monitor students' progress
throughout a course. It includes various tools such as Unit Tests, Assignments, Seminar, Case
study, mini project and Internal Assessments. This approach provides regular feedback, helping
students to identify strengths and areas for improvement, fostering active learning and deeper
understanding. The various tools in continuous assessment are given in Table 2.1.2.
Theory course:
Two assessments each carrying 100 marks shall be conducted during the semester by the
Department / College concerned. The total marks obtained in all assessments put together out of
200, shall be proportionately reduced for 40 marks and rounded to the nearest integer (This also
implies equal weightage to the two assessments).
12
A minimum of two internal assessments will be conducted as a part of continuous assessment.
Each assessment is to be conducted for 100 marks and will have to be distributed in three parts
viz., Part 1 - Unit test, Part 2 - Assignment / Case study/Seminar/Mini project and Part 3 –
Internal assessment with each having a weightage of 15%, 25% and 60% respectively. The total
internal assessment marks of 200 shall be converted into a maximum of 40 marks and rounded to
the nearest integer.
Unit Tests
Unit tests are a crucial part of the academic assessment process, offering a valuable opportunity
to gauge students' understanding and progress in specific sections or units of a course. Unlike the
Semester End Exam (SEE), unit tests are shorter, focused assessments that help identify the
strengths and weaknesses of students in particular topics. The evaluation of a unit test involves
various factors to ensure it as an effective measure of students’ performance, providing useful
feedback to both students and instructors. Each test in a unit is conducted for 30 minutes and
carries 30 marks. Totally 4 tests are conducted and an assignment is proffered for a unit.
The best two of the four tests given for a unit are taken into consideration, and the assignment is
mandatory. After the test is completed and graded, feedback will be provided to students
promptly. This feedback helps students understand their strengths and areas of improvement,
giving them an opportunity to perform better. The unit test also helps in identifying bright
13
students and slow learners, and corrective actions are taken accordingly. The overall weightage
of all 5-unit tests is shown in Table 2.1.4.
2. II Unit test 60
5. V Unit test 60
Internal Assessments
The Internal Assessments are conducted as per the academic calendar. Normally, two internal
assessments are conducted per semester as Internal Assessment –I and Internal Assessment-II.
The syllabus coverage, duration, mark allocation and question paper pattern is given in table
below:
Table 2.1.5: Internal Assessments
Syllabus
Assessment Coverage for Weightage
Duration Pattern Mark Allocation
Marks the
Assessment
Part A Part A – 10 x 2 marks
Ten = 20 marks
questions of Part B – 5 x 13 marks
Internal Unit I, II and 2 marks = 65 marks
Assessment first half of 3 Hours each. Part C – 1 x 15 marks
I Unit III Part B = 15 marks
Five
questions Total marks = 100
(either or marks
20
type) of 13 Part A – 10 x 2 marks
marks each. = 20 marks
Part C Part B – 5 x 13 marks
Remaining
Internal One = 65 marks
half of Unit
Assessment 3 Hours question Part C – 1 x 15 marks
III, Unit IV
II (either or = 15 marks
and V
type) of 15
marks each. Total marks = 100
marks
14
Theory Courses with Laboratory Component
If there is a theory course with laboratory component, there shall be two assessments: the first
assessment (maximum mark is 100) will be similar to assessment of theory course and the
second assessment (maximum mark is 100) will be similar to assessment of laboratory course
respectively. The weightage of first assessment shall be 40 % and the second assessment is 60%.
Table 2.1.6 Assessment tools for Theory Courses with Laboratory Component
Total Internal
Assignment / Internal Evaluation of Internal assessment
Seminar / Case assessment Lab, assessment
study / Mini Observation
project Record
40 60 75 25 200*
*The weighted average shall be converted into 50 marks for internal assessment.
2.1.2.3 Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Initiatives Mapped to POs and PSOs
After calculating the CO attainment, PO attainment, and PSO attainment, gaps were
identified in key areas such as modern tool usage, problem-solving skills, and industry
exposure. To bridge these gaps, additional workshops, hands-on training, and industry
collaborations were introduced. Industry-oriented projects and certification programs were
enhanced to strengthen technical expertise and real-world application. Hackathons, case
studies, and research paper writing were promoted to improve analytical and investigative
skills. Guest lectures and entrepreneurship workshops were expanded to support career
readiness and ethical practices. These continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives ensure
holistic student development and alignment with industry expectations.
15
Table : 2.1.2.3 Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Initiatives Mapped to POs and
PSOs
S.NO PO/PSO Activity Supporting the Curriculum
1 PO1: Engineering Knowledge workshops, Certification programs
2 PO2: Problem Analysis Hackathons, Case study,
3 PO3: Design/Development of Industry-oriented projects, Prototype,
Solutions workshops.
4 PO4: Conduct Investigations of
Research paper writing, Mini projects
Complex Problems
5 PO5: Modern Tool Usage Hands-on training, Programming contests,
6 PO6: The Engineer and Society Seminars, Industry visits
7 PO7: Environment and Sustainability Seminars, Industry visits
8 PO8: Ethics Workshops
9 PO9: Individual and Team Work Group-based capstone projects
10 PO10: Communication Technical presentation competitions
11 PO11: Project Management and
Workshops, Entrepreneurship workshops.
Finance
12 PSO1: Problem-Solving and System
Coding contest
Development
13 PSO2: Modern Technologies and Hands-on training on emerging
Tools technologies (AI/ML), Lab experiments on
modern tools
14 PSO3: Professional and Ethical Guest lectures , Industry-academia
Practices collaboration programs
16
2.1.3 Quality of Classroom Teaching
• The Department has spacious architecturally designed Classrooms that are equipped with
blackboards and LCD projectors, creating an environment conducive to effective
teaching and learning.
• Each classroom is equipped with Projectors, Screens, Board, Imparts Lecture Capture
facilities, notice boards, Boards disseminating Vision, Mission, POs, PSOs and PEOs.
• Each lecture lasts 50 minutes, Course Instructor engage students during lectures by
revising previous lessons, asking questions, and delivering content interactively.
• At the end of each lecture, students are encouraged to summarize key points and ask
questions to clarify any doubts.
• The Head of the Department (HoD) and Principal conduct random class visits every 15
days to ensure syllabus coverage is on track.
• Regular assignments are given to assess student understanding and encourage
improvement in performance.
• Industry experts are invited frequently to deliver talks and seminars on the latest trends in
the field.
• Course Instructors are required to maintain attendance registers, course files to ensure
proper documentation of teaching activities.
• Workshops are organized to provide students with a deeper understanding of concepts
beyond the standard curriculum.
• One-on-one discussions and interactions between professors and students are encouraged
to boost student confidence.
• All classroom session is conducted with objective of meeting the all Cos and Pos.
• Online learning platforms and digital resources are utilized to supplement classroom instruction.
• Continuous feedback mechanisms are in place where students can share their learning
experiences and suggest improvements.
• Fig 2.1.3.1 shows the snap of classroom ambience.
17
Fig 2.1.3.1: Classroom Ambience
• The Department has spacious and well-furnished Laboratories with good ventilation and
lighting facilities. All Laboratories are equipped with essential equipment’s to meet the
requirements of curriculum.
• Course Instructor prepares laboratory manuals well ahead of the commencement of every
semester which includes a list of experiments as per the syllabus, theory related to the
experiment, the procedure on how the experiments are to be done and sample
calculations.
• Each student is assigned with an individual system for simulation labs and a batch of two
to three students are assigned with a worktable for circuits labs.
• Students come prepared for each lab session, following the guidelines in the provided
laboratory manual.
• Different set of design will be allotted to different batches. The students observe, measure
the experimental data and present it using appropriate tables, graphics, figure captions
and units.
• Faculty guide students through each experiment, ensuring that they comprehend the
underlying principles, methodologies, and best practices.
• Lab instructors assist the students in debugging and troubleshooting.
• Each Student documents their experiments and results in observations which is evaluated
based on the output, logic, and viva.
18
• Faculty members are responsible for conducting a detailed analysis to map the Course
Outcomes (COs) with the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes
(PSOs) for each experiment included in the syllabus.
• Fast coders are motivated to work on additional problem statements apart from those
prescribed in the syllabus.
• Fig 2.1.4.1 shows the snap of Laboratory ambience.
Lab courses play a vital role in engineering education as they provide students with
hands-on experience, helping to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical
application. Proper evaluation of lab courses ensures that students not only acquire technical
skills but also develop critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and an understanding of real-
world engineering challenges. The evaluation of lab courses should, therefore, be
comprehensive, assessing both the process and the outcome of students’ work. The assessment
tools of Laboratory courses are given below:
Assessment Weightage
Continuous assessment 60
19
i) Continuous assessment
The maximum marks for Internal Assessment shall be 60 marks in case of practical courses.
Every practical exercise / experiment shall be evaluated based on conduct of experiment /
exercise and records are to be maintained. There shall be at least one test. The criteria for
arriving at the Internal Assessment marks of 60 are as follows: 75 marks shall be awarded for
successful completion of all the prescribed experiments done in the Laboratory and 25 marks for
the test. The total mark shall be converted into a maximum of 60 marks and rounded to the
nearest integer
Table 2.1.5.b) Continuous assessment tools of Laboratory Work
Evaluation of Laboratory
Test (Model Practical Exam)
Observation, Record
75 25
2. Observation / Record 20
3. Time management 5
Total 75
20
Good design with minor gaps PO4,PO11 2
PSO1,PSO2
Limited or superficial analysis 1
• The mentor, subject handling faculty, HOD identifies the weak and bright students based
on the previous semester results, class room behavior and performance in class test and
internal exams.
• Students are clustered in two groups as slow achievers, and fast learners. The students
securing less than 50% in the assessment of any course are considered as slow achievers.
Fast learners are those who score more than 75% in the examinations.
• Slow Achievers are motivated and trained through remedial classes, where the course
handling faculty revises the portions in the pace suitable for the respective students.
• Supported learning, practical examples and concise notes are given to make them grasp
• Students are also given regular class tests to improve their performance in the internal as
21
• Fast learners are motivated to persue advanced online courses, certifications, value added
course, honors courses, participate in tech events and collaborate with industry projects
and research.
• The top three Rank Holders in every Semester Examination are felicitated with cash
awards. Rank Holders are felicitated with gold medals during Convocation
22
Internal
Previous Identification of Weak and Bright students Assessment
University Results Test
Mentor Subject
In charge Unit Test
Approved by HOD
• Placement
• Higher Studies
• Entrepreneur
23
i) Proof for Supporting Slow Learners in Classrooms and Labs
The impact of methodologies tailored for slow and fast learners is evident in their academic
progress and overall engagement. For slow learners, personalized support, such as extra tutoring
and simplified resources, leads to better comprehension of difficult concepts and boosts their
confidence, resulting in improved academic performance and reduced learning gaps. This
approach ensures that slow learners do not fall behind, fostering a more inclusive classroom
environment.
24
Table 2.1.6 a) : Identification criteria and action taken slow learners
Table 2.1.6. b) : Case Study: Academic Journey and Career Progression of a Slow Learner
Student
A SANJAY
Register Number:2114201060/Roll Number:2020PECEC348
SEMESTER GPA No OF ARREARS
IV 6.45 2
V 7.01 2
VI 7.23 1
VII 7.32 1
VIII 7.875 NIL
25
Impact analysis of Encouraging Fast Learners
• Students getting stipend internship is improved
• Many students have cleared exam like GATE, TOFEL, GRE etc.
• Improving number of students turned entrepreneur in engineering and technology
Student feedback plays a crucial role in the Teaching-Learning Process, as it helps in the
continuous improvement of educational practices. The department collects feedback from
students through various methods and at different stages, ensuring that all aspects of the
academic experience are addressed. This feedback is used to enhance the overall functioning of
the teaching process, allowing faculty and the department to make informed decisions and
adjustments for better student engagement and learning outcomes. By actively seeking and
acting upon feedback, a responsive and student-centric academic environment is fostered.
The CSE department has a counseling system that promotes student engagement with academics
and extracurricular activities through regular communication. Each semester, students meet with
their assigned Counsellor at least twice to discuss academic challenges, suggestions, or specific
needs. The counsellor listens to students' concerns and escalates issues to the Head of the
Department for resolution. This system ensures prompt and effective responses, fostering a
26
Fig: 2.1.7.1 Feedback through Councellor
The Class Committee Chairperson and class coordinator conduct a minimum of two class
committee meetings each semester, starting a month after the semester begins. All subject faculty
members are present, and student representatives (4-6 members) actively participate in the
meeting. Students have the opportunity to freely express their opinions on courses, academic
events, and other student-related activities. If any issues are raised regarding the subjects or
faculty, the Head of the Department addresses them based on the class committee chairperson’s
feedback. The class committee chairperson, who does not handle any courses for the class,
27
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Project work enables the students to explore and strengthen the understanding of fundamentals
through practical application of theoretical concepts. Capstone Project Work is a course offered
in the 8th semester to enable the students to apply the technical skills and explore the process of
project development.
At the end of seventh semester HOD / project coordinator addresses the students about how to
choose the project domain and form project teams to do final year project work, as per the steps
briefed in figure 2.1.
Project review committee comprising of senior faculty members from all domains is formed by the
Head of ECE department. One of the senior professors is identified as the project coordinator who
is responsible for planning, scheduling and execution of all the activities related to the student
project work.
Students are asked to form their project team (of size not exceeding four) based on their area of
interest.
30
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Step 1
The project team approach various industries to know the current scenario and look for various
research perspectives to help them in developing solutions
(OR)/ AND
The project team may approach the Faculty members and Research scholars to do In-House
projects based on the project statements declared.
(OR)/AND
The project team may review the existing projects from the reputed journals to identify the
problems existing in their field of interest.
Step 2
The project team present more than one project proposal to the project review committee for
selection and approval
Step 3
The project review committee scrutinizes the project proposals submitted by the project teams,
analyse them based on various factors such as novelty, quality, contribution to the industry/society
etc., The feasibility of completing the project within the stipulated time is also considered as a
primary factor for approval of the project.
Step 4
The project team is instructed to submit the final proposal to the project review committee after
incorporating the necessary changes based on the suggestions/feedback given by the project review
committee
Step 5
31
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
The project review committee evaluates the final proposal and approves the same. The project
coordinator with the help of the project review committee allocates the Supervisor (Internal
Supervisor) for each project team based on their expertise.
Step 6: Once the project proposal is approved and the Supervisor is allocated for each project team,
the team proceeds with the phase II of their project work. The steps involved in phase is briefed in
figure 2.3. In this phase the project team proceeds with design and development of their project
work and complete their work with real time implementation and testing. Table 2.1 shows the
timeline of tasks carried out with respect to project work.
12th Week Call for Project Team Students are asked to form their project team
(of size not exceeding four) based on their area
of interest.
14th week Project Identification The project team present more than one project
proposal to the project review committee for
selection and approval
Semester Eight
1st week Guide Allocation The project coordinator with the help of the
project review committee allocates the
Supervisor (Internal Supervisor) for each project
team based on their expertise.
4th week First Review Students are instructed to submit the system
requirements and give a power point
presentation comprising the proposed
methodology, budget and expected outcomes
8th week Second Review Students are instructed to submit detailed design
document and give a power point presentation
comprising of various modules developed,
integrated and tested.
32
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
12th week Third Review and Final Complete the project work and submit the thesis
Demonstration of the as per guidelines and give a power point
Project work presentation including the real time
implementation
B. Types and Relevance of the projects and their contribution towards attainment of POs
& PSOs
Factors such as domain and scope of the project work, project outcomes, environment, safety,
standards and Cost are considered to classify projects into the following types
i. Application
ii. Product
iii. Research
iv. Review
The final year project carried out by students can be industry-oriented projects or in-house
projects. Industry-oriented projects are carried out in public sector/private sector industry to
develop solutions to cater the industrial needs under the guidance of the external supervisor and
internal supervisor. In-house projects are carried out in the institute under the guidance of the
internal supervisor. The project may be a complete product design or part of research/consultancy
work carried out in the college.
Students identify and analyse complex problems by conducting literature review of the
stated topic and formulate the problem (PO2).
Students define the processes and design solutions to implement the project work (PO3)
and use research-based knowledge to provide valid conclusions (PO4).
The solutions, products developed by students contributes to the society in terms of health,
safety aspects (PO6) and/or to the environment (PO7)
Students carry out the final year project work as a team (maximum of 4 members) or as an
individual. It exhibits their team work (PO9) and also students develop knowledge
regarding project management and handling finance (PO11).
Students may use modelling, prediction tools during the implementation phase of the
project work (PO5).
Students may apply the fundamental engineering knowledge (PO1) in providing
hardware/software solutions.
During project work students demonstrate an understanding of the basic concepts in
Electronics and Communication Engineering (PSO1).
Students analyze complex problems, conduct research, develop products or provide
software and hardware solutions to meet the societal, industrial needs (PSO2).
The knowledge gained through the various phases of project work helps the students to
understand the technological challenges, engage in independent and life-long learning
(PO12), and also to excel in their professional career. (PSO3).
The Capstone Project is structured to develop a comprehensive range of competencies that align with
Program Outcomes (POs), Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs), and Washington Accord Knowledge (WKs)
components to foster a well-rounded engineering education. It emphasizes identifying real-world
engineering problems through research and lifelong learning, aligning with PO1 (Engineering
Knowledge), PO2 (Problem Analysis), PO4 (Investigations), and PO11 (Lifelong Learning). It is
further supported by WK1 (Natural Sciences), WK3 (Engineering Fundamentals), and WK8 (Research
Engagement), ensuring students enhance domain knowledge and critical thinking. This also maps to PSO1
(Technical Knowledge), PSO2 (Problem-Solving Skills), and PSO3 (Industry Readiness and
Entrepreneurship), preparing students for real-world
33challenges.
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
The project focuses on applying engineering principles and project management to propose
innovative solutions, strongly mapping to PO1, PO2, PO3 (Design/Development), and PO10
(Communication). It draws on WK2 (Mathematical Modelling), WK3 (Engineering
Principles), WK6 (Technological Applications), and WK8 (Critical Research Insights),
enabling students to develop innovative and feasible solutions. This directly contributes to PSO1
and PSO2, enhancing their ability to apply engineering concepts in real-world scenarios. It also
emphasizes utilizing modern tools for project design and implementation while considering
societal and environmental impacts, aligning with PO3, PO5 (Modern Tools), and PO6
(Engineer and Society). It is supported by WK4 (Engineering Specialist Knowledge), WK5
(Sustainability Concepts), and WK6 (Engineering Practice), ensuring students understand the
role of technology in addressing societal challenges. This contributes to PSO1 and PSO2, fostering
strong analytical and problem-solving skills. The project involves critically evaluating project data
while adhering to quality, safety, and ethical standards, mapping to PO4, PO6, and PO7
(Environment & Sustainability). It integrates WK5 (Environmental Impact), WK7 (Societal
Responsibilities), and WK9 (Ethics and Inclusivity), reinforcing ethical considerations in
engineering.
This aligns with PSO2 and PSO3, ensuring students develop responsible and sustainable
engineering solutions. Additionally, it emphasizes rigorous testing, validation, and documentation,
aligning with PO5, PO9 (Teamwork), and PO10 (Communication). It is supported by WK2
(Data Analysis), WK6 (Engineering Practice), and WK9 (Professional Ethics), ensuring
students enhance their ability to assess the feasibility and performance of their solutions. This
contributes to PSO1 and PSO3, fostering teamwork and industry readiness.
Furthermore, the project encourages students to develop innovative solutions while considering
ethical and societal impacts, strongly mapping to PO1, PO3, PO6, and PO7. It is reinforced by
WK4 (Advanced Engineering Knowledge), WK5 (Sustainability), WK7 (Societal
Responsibilities), and WK9 (Ethics), ensuring that students integrate ethical considerations into
their designs. This supports PSO1, PSO2, and PSO3, ensuring a holistic approach to engineering
challenges.
WK2 (Mathematical
Applying
PO1 (Engineering Modeling),
engineering PSO1 (Technical
Knowledge), WK3 (Engineering
principles and Knowledge),
PO2 (Problem Analysis), Principles),
project management PSO2 (Problem-
PO3 (Design/Development), WK6 (Technological
to propose Solving Skills)
PO10 (Communication) Applications),
innovative solutions
34 WK8 (Critical
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Research Insights)
Utilizing modern
WK4 (Engineering
tools for project
Specialist
design and PSO1 (Technical
PO3 (Design/Development), Knowledge),
implementation Knowledge),
PO5 (Modern Tools), WK5 (Sustainability
while considering PSO2 (Problem-
PO6 (Engineer and Society) Concepts),
societal and Solving Skills)
WK6 (Engineering
environmental
Practice)
impacts
WK5
Critically
PSO2 (Problem- (Environmental
evaluating project PO4 (Investigations),
Solving Skills), Impact),
data while adhering PO6 (Engineer and Society),
PSO3 (Industry WK7 (Societal
to quality, safety, PO7 (Environment &
Readiness & Responsibilities),
and ethical Sustainability)
Entrepreneurship) WK9 (Ethics and
standards
Inclusivity)
PSO1 (Technical WK2 (Data
Rigorous testing, PO5 (Modern Tools), Knowledge), Analysis),
validation, and PO9 (Teamwork), PSO3 (Industry WK6 (Engineering
documentation PO10 (Communication) Readiness & Practice), WK9
Entrepreneurship) (Professional Ethics)
WK4 (Advanced
PSO1 (Technical
PO1 (Engineering Engineering
Developing Knowledge),
Knowledge), Knowledge),
innovative solutions PSO2 (Problem-
PO3 (Design/Development), WK5
while considering Solving Skills),
PO6 (Engineer and Society), (Sustainability),
ethical and societal PSO3 (Industry
PO7 (Environment & WK7 (Societal
impacts Readiness &
Sustainability) Responsibilities),
Entrepreneurship)
WK9 (Ethics)
Capstone projects should be aligned with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to
create a meaningful and lasting global impact.
2.2.4 Relevance of Capstone projects to the SDGs
Capstone projects should be aligned with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to create
a meaningful and lasting global impact.
equality, and SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) advocates for sustainable water solutions.
SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) fosters innovation and infrastructure
development, while SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) supports the creation of
economic opportunities. Projects targeting SDG 13 (Climate Action) focus on combating climate
change, and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) works toward resilient and
sustainable urban areas. Lastly, SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) emphasizes the importance
of collaboration across sectors to achieve these global objectives. By aligning capstone projects
with these SDGs, students contribute to advancing global sustainability efforts and address
pressing global challenges.
80
70
70 65
59
60
50
40
30
19 19
20
8 9 10 10
10
0
2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025
36
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Table 2.2.4 Types and relevance of the Projects and their contribution towards attainment of POs & PSOs – [CAYm1-2023-2024]
PROJECT TYPE
(APPLICATION/ RELEVANC
BATC Name of the Industry/Inhou PRODUCT/ JUSTIFICATIO RELEVANCE
Register No. Name of the Student Project Title E TO POs,
H NO. Supervisor se RESEARCH/ N TO SDG GOALS
REVIEW) PSOs & WKs
It fosters
problem-
solving,
211420106004 ABI ALAMELU S R teamwork, and
life-long
learning while
contributing to SDG 9: Industry,
FORTIFYING research and Innovation, and
PO1 - PO12,
211420106013 AKSHAYA V DIGITAL IMAGES development in Infrastructure –
PSO1,
THROUGH DUAL emerging Focuses on
1 Dr.S.Shibu Inhouse Application PSO2,PSO3,
LOGISTIC communication innovation in
211420106028 ASWINI R PSO3, WK1-
CHAOTIC MAP technologies, secure
WK9,
ENCRYPTION ensuring communication
proficiency in systems.
addressing
challenges in
211420106275 UBASANA POOJA S S
secure and
reliable
communication
systems.
211420106021 ARUL PREETHI U P This work SDG 9: Industry,
PO1 - PO12,
Design of Triband contributes to Innovation, and
2 Mrs.N.Pritha Inhouse Research PSO1,
Bandpass Filter the development Infrastructure –
211420106115 KAVIYA A B PSO2,PSO3,
of advanced Enhancing
37
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
techniques, reduces
specifically misinformation.
Recurrent
Neural
Networks
(RNN) and
Long Short-
211420106117 KEERTHIGA S Term Memory
(LSTM) models,
to address the
critical
challenge of
identifying and
categorizing
fake news.
It demonstrates
211420106124 KRITHIKA S real-world
applicability by
211420106129 LAVANYA J addressing a SDG 3: Good
Predicting Coronary PO1 - PO12, critical Health and Well-
211420106143 MEENALOKSHANA G E Heart Disease using PSO1, healthcare being – Advances
Dr.Sheeba
5 an Improved Light Inhouse Application PSO2,PSO3, challenge, healthcare
Santhosh
Gradient Boosting PSO3, WK1- contributing to through AI-
Machine model WK9 research in driven
211420106148 MONICA P medical diagnostics.
diagnostics and
intelligent
systems.
This project
211420106039 CHANDANA S focuses on SDG 3: Good
An Integrated device PO1 - PO12, designing a Health and Well-
211420106061 AARTHI R to monitor stress and PSO1, comprehensive being – Advances
6 anxiety with Dr.S.Deepa Inhouse Application PSO2,PSO3, system that healthcare
211420106109 KARISMA V therapeutic PSO3, WK1- combines through AI-
treatment WK9 monitoring and driven
211420106118 KEERTHIKA S therapeutic diagnostics.
interventions for
39
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
1 RF Circuit Design 3 2 5
4 Medical Electronics 20 22 25
7 Image Processing 10 13 8
Wireless communication
9 5 7 4
and Networks
10 Sensor Networks 2 0 1
Total 86 93 91
1 SDG 1 No Poverty
0 0 0
64
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Responsible Consumption
12 SDG 12
and Production 3 3 3
13 SDG 13 Climate Action
2 2 2
14 SDG 14 Life Below Water
1 1 1
15 SDG 15 Life on Land
2 2 2
Peace, Justice, and Strong
16 SDG 16
Institutions 5 7 5
17 SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
0 0 0
Total 86 93
90
At the end of every month, review is conducted to continuously monitor the progress of the project work by
the project evaluation committee in the presence of the internal Supervisor and project review committee
members. The components expected from project team during each review is briefed in figure 2.2.6
65
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Budget
Integration of Research Paper
Modules
Expected Conference
Outcomes Review Paper Presentation
Documentation
15 15 30 05 05 10 10 10
REVIEW 2 (15)
Evaluation Max
Low Medium High
Parameters Marks
Excellent knowledge
about project work and
Technical Has less
Has the knowledge of has applied tools
knowledge, understanding about
the working of project effectively to
design details and the working of the 5
and technology used design/analyze and
implementation project
(2-3) obtain optimal
methods (1)
solution for the
problem. (4-5)
Presentation is to be
improved with clear Clear and lucid
Unable to present the
focus on providing presentation with focus
Presentation work carried out 5
solutions to the on the proposed
(1)
problems identified (2 methods (4-5)
-3)
TOTAL 15
REVIEW 3 (30)
Evaluation Max
Low Medium High
Parameters Marks
Clear demonstration with
Completion of Demonstration needs
Failed effective working model
project work clarity with in-depth
demonstration and in-depth technical
and final technical knowledge of the
due to knowledge of the 10
Demonstration processes/working
incomplete work processes/working
with working principle of the components
(0-2) principle of the
model used. (3-6)
components used. (7-10)
Project work contributes
Scope of the work is limited
Quality of significantly to the
and needs more focus on the
Project work industrial
Quality of broader context of
needs /societal/environmental 10
project work societal/environmental,
improvement needs with effective
health and safety aspects (3-
(0-2) utilization of modern
6)
tools. (7-10)
67
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Poorly prepared
report and report Report to be prepared with
not well-defined content Well prepared report
Quality of meeting the relevant to the proposed with clear focus on the
thesis (report) 5
specifications work carried out and stick proposed work and in
prescribed by to the format specified. (2- specified formats (4-5)
the university 3)
(1)
Presentation is to be
Clear and lucid
Unable to improved with clear focus
presentation with focus
Presentation present the work on providing solutions to 5
on the proposed methods
carried out (1) the problems identified (2
(4-5)
-3)
TOTAL 30
Table 2.2.11: Project Work Evaluation Mapping with POs, PSOs, and WKs
Max Mapped
Evaluation Parameter Mapped POs Mapped WKs
Marks PSOs
Review I (15 Marks)
Identification of Domain,
PO1, PO2,
Problem Definition, and 5 PSO1 WK1, WK3
PO3
Objectives
PO2, PO4,
Literature Survey 5 PSO1 WK2, WK4
PO5
Methodology Proposed PO3, PO6,
5 PSO2 WK5, WK7
and Time Management PO11
Review II (15 Marks)
Technical Knowledge,
PO1, PO3,
Design Details, and 5 PSO1, PSO2 WK2, WK5
PO5, PO6
Implementation Methods
Methodology Followed
PO2, PO6,
and Meeting of Time 5 PSO1, PSO2 WK4, WK6
PO11
Schedules
Presentation 5 PO10, PO9 PSO3 WK8, WK9
Review III (30 Marks)
Completion of Project
Work and Final PO1, PO2,
10 PSO1, PSO2 WK3, WK6
Demonstration with PO3, PO5
Working Model
PO6, PO7,
Quality of Project Work 10 PSO3 WK7, WK8
PO8, PO9
Quality of Thesis (Report) 5 PO9, PO10 PSO3 WK9
Presentation 5 PO10, PO11 PSO3 WK9
Project Report Evaluation (10 Marks)
Technical Content and PO1, PO2,
5 PSO1 WK1, WK2
Documentation PO3
Formatting and Clarity 5 PO10, PO11 PSO3 WK9
Viva-Voce (30 Marks)
Understanding of
PO1, PO2,
Concepts and Technical 10 PSO1, PSO2 WK1, WK2
PO3, PO5
Knowledge
Ability to Justify the Work PO4, PO6,
10 PSO2, PSO3 WK5, WK6
Done PO7
Communication and
10 PO9, PO10 PSO3 WK8, WK9
Presentation Skills
Total Marks 100 Marks
68
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Project Demonstration:
At the end of final year, as per the university schedule, end semester viva voce is arranged. The project team
present their work in front of the university appointed external examiner for final evaluation of the project
work. Students demonstrate their project in front of a panel consisting of:
i. Internal project Supervisor
ii. External academia/industry personnel
iii. Department project coordinator
Evaluation is carried out based on various criterion such as
1. Extent of Literature Survey carried
2. Innovation and novelty of the project
3. Understanding of Project
4. Presentation skills
5. Use of modern tools/software
6. Implementation of the work
7. Working model Demonstration
8. Testing
9. Benefits to the society, environment and sustainability aspects
10. Cost effectiveness, safety and ethical aspects
11. Publication and patent application, if any
Project Coordinator evaluates the quality of the project based on the following criteria:
i. Design, Analysis, Implementation and execution of the project.
ii. Application, Review, Product and Research projects.
iii. Innovative projects
iv. Societal impact
v. Innovation
vi. Relation to Environment and sustainability
vii. Safety and ethics
viii. Cost effectiveness
ix. Paper Publications, Patent / Copy right
x. Originality
xi. Life Long Learning
Based on the above-mentioned criteria, the PRC and Project Coordinator assess the quality of the completed projects.
Each of the above mentioned factors contributes to the overall quality and impact of the capstone/major project, ensuring
that it addresses global challenges, relates to environment and sustainability, cost effectiveness, promotes innovation,
and aligns with professional and ethical standards.
The best projects are evaluated using the performance indicators mentioned below in table 2.2.12
Table 2.2.12: Best Project Evaluation Scheme
S.No. Performance Indicator Marks
1 Innovation & Creativity of the Project (20)
2 Contribution to the society/environment/industry/research etc., (15)
3 Cost effectiveness (15)
4 Safety and ethics (15)
5 Publications (Conferences/Journal)/Awards won & Patent applicable (20)
6 Contribution to Funded Project/Consultancy projects/research work (15)
TOTAL 100
69
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
211420106039 CHANDANA S
An Integrated
211420106061 AARTHI R device to PO1 - SDG 3:
monitor stress PO11, Good Health
4
and anxiety PSO1, and Well-
211420106109 KARISMA V with therapeutic PSO2 Being
treatment
211420106118 KEERTHIKA S
Smart Home
211420106001 AARTHI R Integration with
AI: Enhanced
211420106048 DEEPIKA S PO1 - SDG 3:
security and
PO11, Good Health
5 accessibility for
PSO1, and Well-
facial
PSO2 Being
211420106084 HARSHINI S recognition and
prosopagnosia
solutions
ADERU Revolutionizing
211420106007 CHENCHU PO1 - SDG 3:
Alzheimers
DEEPIKA PO11, Good Health
6 diagnosis: An
PSO1, and Well-
DARISETTI advanced
211420106046 PSO2 Being
JAHNAVI recognition and
70
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
grouping using
AVULA BANHI
211420106033 neuroimaging
SIKHA
data
Electric Vehicle
211420106098 JERIKA A Charging
JOYCE station
211420106103 PO1 - SDG 7:
JAYAKUMARI P integrated with
PO11, Affordable
7 Wireless Power
KIRANSUPRIYA PSO1, and Clean
211420106121 Transmission
RS PSO2 Energy
and
211420106122 KIRUTHIGA C Photovoltaic
Generation
JEEVA INTELLIGENT
211420106096 LOCALIZATI
SWASTHIKA J
ON SYSTEM
FOR PO1 - SDG 3:
PO11, Good Health
8
CONSTRUCTI PSO1, and Well-
211420106116 KEERTHANA S ON PSO2 Being
ACCIDENT
RESCUE
USING RSS
NALLAPA
211420106160 REDDY
PARVESH
NAMBARI CAR
211420106161 YUVANARASIM PARKING PO1 - SDG 3:
HA RAO REGISTRATIO PO11, Good Health
9
N AND PSO1, and Well-
PATIL LAKSHMI
ONLINE PSO2 Being
211420106128 PRASANTH
PAYMENT
REDDY
GURIJALA
211420106074
PRAVEEN
Integration of
211420106155 MUKILAN R Raspberry PI 4
and YOLO V8
211420106157 MURUGESAN A SDG 11:
for precision PO1 -
Sustainable
LASER- PO11,
10 Cities and
211420106191 RAGHUL R Supervisor d PSO1,
Communitie
target detection PSO2
s
SANJAY S and tracking in
211420106216 loitering
(30/07/2002)
applications
DHANALAKSHM ENHANCED
211420106052 PERFORMAN
IR
DIVYA CE OF
211420106059 INFRACTION
BHARATHI S PO1 - SDG 3:
DETECTION
DIVYADHARSHI PO11, Good Health
11 211420106060 USING
NI T PSO1, and Well-
RANDOM
PSO2 Being
FOREST BY
211420106066 GAYATHRI K COMPUTATIO
NAL
ANALYSIS
INUKURTHI
211420106086
CHAKRADHAR
PACHIPULUSU EARTHQUAK
211420106172 PO1 - SDG 3:
SAI SRI HARSHA E DETECTION
PO11, Good Health
12 UNDER
211420106146 MOHITH SAI PSO1, and Well-
WATER
PSO2 Being
SIRIGIRI USING LORA
211420106240 VENKATA
GOWTHAM
JAYA SURYA LI-FI BASED PO1 - SDG 3:
13 211420106092
NARAYANAN ADVANCED PO11, Good Health
71
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
VEHICLE PSO1, and Well-
211420106267 TEJAS RAM R A SAFETY PSO2 Being
SYSTEM
211420106250 SRIRAM M
VELUGULETI
211420106281
DHANUSH
Design and
211420106262 SURIYA S Performance
Analysis of
211420106284 VETRIVEL P PO1 -
Multiply and SDG4:
PO11,
14 Accumulator Quality
PSO1,
(MACL Unit Education
PSO2
for Machine
2114201063 Learning
07 GOUTHEM S Acceleration
VANJIVAKA
211420106277
CHANUKYA
Parkinson PO1 - SDG 3:
MALLARAPU
disease PO11, Good Health
15 211420106138 MOHANA
detection using PSO1, and Well-
MURALI
deep network PSO2 Being
VAKATI SAI
211420106276
SANTHOSH
Revolutionising
211420106168 NITISH SARAN R Farming
PRASANNA techniques:
211420106183 PO1 - SDG 3:
VENKATESH V R kNN and CNN
PO11, Good Health
16 for automated
RITHISH PSO1, and Well-
211420106204 plant and plant
KANNAN J PSO2 Being
disease
SANTHOSH management
211420106222
PERUMAL S app
211420106174 PARASHURAM R
Diagnosis of
REHAN KUMAR Virus, Bacteria PO1 - SDG 3:
211420106199
R or normal PO11, Good Health
17
2114201063 Pneumonia by PSO1, and Well-
15 MANIESHWAR R using Neural PSO2 Being
2114201063 Network
KARTHIK.M.K
13
THIRD
211420106062 DIWAKAR D PRIZE in
KAMAL KESHAV Dynamic Project
211420106107 Wireless Expo'2024
K PO1 - SDG 3:
charging of E- Organised
PO11, Good Health
18 211420106106 KAMALESH P A Vehicle using by
PSO1, and Well-
RFID in Departme
PSO2 Being
conjunction nt of ECE,
211420106110 KARHIKEYAN L with IOT Panimalar
Engineerin
g College
74
Figure 2.2.7 Certificate of Appreciation – Project Expo Winners
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
2023-2024
EVIDENCES FOR
SL.NO. Register No. Name of the Student Title of Paper
PAPERS PUBLISHED
7th International
FORTIFYING
Conference On
1 211420106004 ABI ALAMELU S R DIGITAL IMAGES
Intelligent Computing
THROUGH DUAL
(IConIC2k24),Panimalar
75
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
LOGISTICS CHAOTIC Engineering College,
211420106013 AKSHAYA V MAP ENCRYPTION Chennai.
211420106028 ASWINI R
UBASANA POOJA S
211420106275
S
211420106021 ARUL PREETHI U P
7th International
211420106115 KAVIYA A B DESIGN AND Conference On
ANALYSIS OF DUAL Intelligent Computing
2
LAKSHANA SRI G BAND BANDPASS (IConIC2k24),Panimalar
211420106127 FILTER Engineering College,
K
Chennai.
211420106137 MALATHI V P
211420106124 KRITHIKA S
7th International
CORONARY HEART
211420106129 LAVANYA J Conference On
DISEASE
Intelligent Computing
4 PREDICTION USING
MEENALOKSHANA (IConIC2k24),Panimalar
211420106143 IMPROVED LIGHT
GE Engineering College,
GBM MODEL
Chennai.
211420106148 MONICA P
211420106039 CHANDANA S
AN INTEGRATED 7th International
211420106061 AARTHI R DEVICE TO Conference On
MONITOR STRESS Intelligent Computing
5
AND ANXIETY WITH (IConIC2k24),Panimalar
211420106109 KARISMA V THERAPEUTIC Engineering College,
TREATMENT Chennai.
211420106118 KEERTHIKA S
211420106098 JERIKA A
ELECTRIC VEHICLE 7th International
JOYCE CHARGING STATION Conference On
211420106103
JAYAKUMARI P INTEGRATED WITH Intelligent Computing
7
KIRANSUPRIYA R WIRELESS POWER (IConIC2k24),Panimalar
211420106121 TRANSMISSION AND Engineering College,
S
PV GENERATION Chennai.
211420106122 KIRUTHIGA C
211420106249 SRINIVASAN V
7th International
THOMAS G Enhancing the
211420106274 Conference On
GEORGE Efficiency of Wallace
Intelligent Computing
11 Tree Multipliers
VIVEKANANDHAN (IConIC2k24),Panimalar
211420106295 Through Optimized
A Engineering College,
ECSLA Design
Chennai.
211420106297 YOGESH M
INTEGRATED
211420106196 RAJNISH J AGRICULTURAL
SUPPLY CHAIN
211420106197 RAKKESH S 7th International
MANAGEMENT
Conference On
SYSTEM: A
Intelligent Computing
12 211420106208 SAARUNATHAN T MODULAR
(IConIC2k24),Panimalar
APPROACH FOR
Engineering College,
PREDICTIVE
SAMUEL SIBBI Chennai.
211420106212 YIELDING,
RAYAN J STORAGE, AND
DISTRIBUTION
211420106195 RAJAKUMARAN J BORDER DEFENCE 7th International
MECHANISM Conference On
CLASSIFICATION Intelligent Computing
13 211420106209 SABARI R
USING DEEP (IConIC2k24),Panimalar
LEARNING Engineering College,
211420106211 SAKTHI DINESH P TECHNIQUES Chennai.
211420106062 DIWAKAR D
DYNAMIC WIRELESS 7th International
211420106107 KAMAL KESHAV K CHARGING SYSTEM Conference On
FOR E-VEHICLES Intelligent Computing
15
USING RFID IN (IConIC2k24),Panimalar
211420106106 KAMALESH P A CONJUCTION WITH Engineering College,
IOT Chennai.
211420106110 KARHIKEYAN L
ANALYSIS OF 7th International
16 211420106038 BHUVANESH P
STEPPED Conference On
77
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
IMPEDANCE Intelligent Computing
211420106064 DWARAKNATH S L BANDPASS FILTER (IConIC2k24),Panimalar
WITH COUPLING Engineering College,
211420106073 GOWTHAM K Chennai.
JERIL KISHORE A
211420106099
M
Note:DOI is not provided as the online publication of the papers is under process.
78
C. Continuous monitoring process
The continuous monitoring process for the capstone project is designed to provide
consistent guidance and evaluation to students throughout the project work. Faculty members
are assigned as guide to monitor the progress of the students, following a predefined schedule
outlined in the academic timetable.
Under the supervision of the assigned faculty, students receive regular input and
support in the following key areas:
Idea Generation and Project Layout
Domain Specification and Problem Statement Study
Literature Review and Methodology Formation
Design Discussions and Evaluation
Prototyping and Review
Capstone Completion and Publication
This structured and continuous monitoring approach ensures that students stay on
track, receive timely support, and achieve the learning outcomes expected from a capstone
project as shown in figure 2.2.a. It provides an environment for active mentorship, skill
development, and academic excellence.
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 83
Figure No.2.2.a: Project report card for Continuous monitoring
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 84
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 85
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 86
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 87
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 88
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 89
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 90
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 91
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 92
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 93
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 94
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 95
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 96
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 97
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 98
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 99
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 100
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 101
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 102
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 103
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 104
Figure No.2.2.b: Batch 2024 – Capstone Projects
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 105
D. Quality of completed projects/working models/proto types in relation to environment, sustainability, safety, ethics and
cost
Table No.2.2.3: Quality of completed projects/working models/prototypes in relation to environment, sustainability, safety,
ethics and cost
Relevance
Working
Sustainability
Environment
Model
Safety
Ethics
S.No Title of the Capstone Project /Prototype/ Justifications
Cost
Industry
Project
Batch 2020-2024
The Peri-Urban Civic Services Enhancement System
improves sustainability and efficiency by optimizing resource
Peri-Urban Civic Services management in growing urban areas.
1. Prototype
Enhancement System
It ensures cost-effectiveness and ethics by enhancing service
delivery, reducing waste, and improving public infrastructure.
The IoT-based Smart Greenhouse using NodeMCU enhances
sustainability by optimizing water, energy, and resource
IoT Based Smart Green House for Prototype usage.
2.
Future Using Node MCU It improves cost-efficiency and ethics by automating climate
control for better crop yield with minimal human
intervention.
The AI-based Smart Vision Assistive System enhances safety
and ethics by providing real-time assistance to visually
AI Based Smart Vision Assistive Prototype
3. impaired individuals.
System
It ensures cost-effectiveness and sustainability by leveraging
AI for efficient, low-power, and accessible solutions.
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 106
The Deep Learning-based Lung Disease Detection system
improves safety by enabling accurate early diagnosis and
An Implementation of Deep
Prototype reducing misdiagnosis risks.
4. Learning for Lungs Disease
It enhances cost-effectiveness and sustainability by
Detection on Medical Images
automating medical image analysis, minimizing resource
usage, and optimizing healthcare efficiency
The Transformative Drawing Recognition Using CNN and
Transformative Drawing Flask enhances efficiency by enabling accurate real-time sketch
Recognition Via Convolution Neural Prototype interpretation.
5.
Networks and Flask Fusion It ensures cost-effectiveness and sustainability by leveraging
lightweight frameworks for seamless deployment in various
applications.
KNCET/MECH/NBA/SAR-2025 107
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Internships are an essential part of the academic curriculum for students in the Electronics
and Communication Engineering (ECE) department. The internship process is designed to
provide students with practical experience and hands-on learning, helping them apply their
theoretical knowledge to real-world problems and develop key professional skills.
82
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
All CSE students are required to complete an internship as part of their curriculum, which
must be undertaken during their summer or winter vacation. The duration of the internship is
either 2 weeks for 1 credit, 4 weeks for 2 credits, or 6 weeks for 3 credits, as specified in the
curriculum. Students can choose to complete their internship at industries, companies,
research organizations, or universities, provided they obtain approval from the Department
Advisory Committee (DAC). The DAC reviews the relevance of the internship opportunity to
the student’s academic goals and career aspirations before granting approval.
In this stage, students are introduced to industries and fields likeEmbedded Design, VLSI
Programming, Cloud Services, Internet of things, Cyber Security, PLC Controls and
automation, Robotics, Signals and systems, Artificial Intelligence, Data science, Software
development., ensuring that the internships align with their field of study. The Department
Advisory Committee (DAC) ensures that the opportunities provided align with the student's
academic development and career goals. This process fosters PO1 (Engineering
Knowledge) as students gain practical exposure to advanced technologies, applying their
fundamental engineering principles. Additionally, PO3 (Design & Development Solutions) is
promoted through the involvement of students in designing and developing real-world
solutions. This stage also contributes to PSO1 (Engineering Knowledge Application),
ensuring that students apply their academic knowledge to industry-specific engineering tasks.
Furthermore, students develop WK1 (Professional Skills in Technical Fields) by engaging
in specialized fields like Embedded Design, VLSI Programming, Cloud Services, Internet of
things, Cyber Security, Robotics, Signals and systems.
2. Application Process
Once a student identifies an internship opportunity, they must submit an application that
includes their updated resume, a cover letter outlining their interest in the internship, and any
other necessary documents such as transcripts or portfolios, as required by the organization.
Students may search for internship opportunities through campus placement services, online
job platforms like LinkedIn and Internshala or directly through industry contacts. After
identifying a suitable opportunity, students must seek approval from the DAC to ensure the
internship aligns with their academic and professional development.
The DAC ensures that specialized internships, particularly in areas like Robotics, IoT,
Embedded and AI, provide exposure to the latest technologies. This process promotes PO9
83
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
(Individual & Teamwork) as students demonstrate the ability to communicate their skills and
interest individually in the application process. Additionally, PO8 (Ethics) is emphasized, as
students are encouraged to present themselves professionally and ethically in their
applications. This step also aligns with PSO2 (Engineering Problem Solving), ensuring that
the internship enhances their problem-solving abilities by choosing relevant opportunities.
WK5 (Communication Skills) are enhanced during the process, as students must craft clear
and compelling cover letters and resumes.
3. Internship Execution
The internship is conducted during the summer or winter vacation as per the academic
schedule. Students are expected to complete the internship continuously for the duration
specified (either 2, 4, or 6 weeks). During the internship, students work on projects related to
their field of study, such as software development, database management, system design, and
engineering problem-solving. They may be involved in developing hardware solutions,
analyzing large datasets for image processing, building prototypes using IoT technologies, or
working on AI algorithms.
Upon completing the internship, students are required to submit a detailed report
documenting the work they have done during the internship. The report should include
descriptions of the tasks performed, the technologies used (e.g., PCB Designing, Circuit
designing, Artificial Intelligence), challenges faced, and how they applied their engineering
knowledge to solve problems. The report serves as a key element in evaluating the student’s
performance and understanding of the internship experience.
84
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
5. Viva-Voce Examination
After submitting the report, students must undergo a Viva-Voce examination conducted by a
three-member Departmental Committee. This oral examination allows the committee
members to assess the student’s understanding of the internship tasks, their ability to apply
engineering principles, and their communication skills. During the Viva-Voce, students
explain their internship experience, discuss the technical aspects of their work, and answer
questions posed by the committee members.
The Viva-Voce emphasizes PO9 (Individual & Teamwork) as students must demonstrate
their communication and presentation skills. It also aligns with PO10 (Communication),
particularly in assessing verbal communication and the ability to explain technical concepts
clearly. The examination evaluates students' critical thinking, particularly in fields such as AI,
Cloud Services, or Machine Learning, contributing to PSO2 (Engineering Problem
Solving). Through this process, students also hone WK6 (Public Speaking and
Presentation Skills) as they present their work clearly and effectively to the committee.
The evaluation of the internship is based on the student’s report, the Viva-Voce examination,
and the certificate issued by the organization where the internship was completed. The
Departmental Committee assesses the quality of the report and the student’s performance in
the Viva-Voce. The final evaluation is graded on a scale of 100 marks, and the earned credits
will be reflected in the student’s academic record. However, these credits do not influence the
CGPA.
85
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
The evaluation process reinforces PO11 (Life-long Learning) as students reflect on their
learning and growth during the internship. It also enhances PO12 (Project Management) as
students demonstrate the ability to complete a project by managing time and resources
effectively. The assessment process ensures students gain practical exposure in their
engineering field, directly contributing to PSO3 (Project Management & Practical
Engineering Solutions). WK7 (Self-assessment & Reflection Skills) is developed as
students assess their progress and performance through both written and oral assessments.
7. Continuous Improvement
After completing the internship, students are encouraged to provide feedback on their
experience. This feedback helps the department identify areas where the internship process
can be improved, such as enhancing industry partnerships, improving application procedures,
or providing more effective guidance during the internship.
The Departmental Committee reviews this feedback and uses it to refine and improve the
internship process for future batches of students, ensuring that the internships remain aligned
with industry trends and academic requirements.
Table 2.3.1 : Mapping Tablefor the Internship process withProgram Outcomes (POs),
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs), and Knowledge and Attitude Profile (WKs)
86
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Teamwork)
PO8 (Ethics)
PO9 (Individual &
Application Teamwork) PSO2 (Engineering WK5 (Communication
Process Problem Solving) Skills)
PO8 (Ethics)
PO1 (Engineering
PSO1 (Engineering
Knowledge)
Knowledge
Internship Application) WK2 (Data Analysis
PO2 (Problem Analysis)
Execution & Algorithm Skills)
PSO2 (Engineering
PO5 (Modern Tool
Problem Solving)
Usage)
PO4 (Conduct
Investigations of
Report
Complex Problems), PO6
Preparation PSO2 (Engineering WK4 (Technical
(The Engineer and
and Problem Solving) Writing)
Society), PO7
Submission
(Environment and
Sustainability)
PO9 (Individual &
WK6 (Public Speaking
Viva-Voce Teamwork) PSO2 (Engineering
and Presentation
Examination Problem Solving)
Skills)
PO10 (Communication)
PO11
PSO3 (Project
Evaluation (Life-long Learning)
Management & WK7 (Self-assessment
and Credit
Practical Engineering & Reflection Skills)
Assignment PO12 (Project
Solutions)
Management)
PSO1 (Engineering
Knowledge
Continuous PO11 (Life-long Application) WK8 (Feedback &
Improvement Learning) Adaptation Skills)
PSO2 (Engineering
Problem Solving)
Internship
(Continuous Assessment)
Presentation /
Internship Report Viva-Voce Total
Demonstration
40 30 30 100
87
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Table 2.3.3: Mapping Table for the Internship Rubrics with Program Outcomes (POs),
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs), and Knowledge and Attitude Profile (WKs)
Max
Evaluation Parameter Mapped POs Mapped PSOs Mapped WKs
Marks
Report (40 Marks)
Problem Identification,
Literature Review, and 10 PO1, PO2, PO3 PSO1 WK1, WK2
Objectives
Methodology and
10 PO3, PO5, PO6 PSO2 WK3, WK5
Implementation Plan
Results, Discussion, and
10 PO4, PO7, PO9 PSO1, PSO3 WK4, WK6
Analysis
Report Structure, Formatting,
10 PO9, PO10, PO11 PSO3 WK8, WK9
and Referencing
Presentation (30 Marks)
Clarity in Explanation of
10 PO3, PO5, PO6 PSO1, PSO2 WK2, WK3
Work
Visual Aids and Technical
10 PO9, PO10 PSO3 WK8, WK9
Content Delivery
Response to Queries and
10 PO6, PO7, PO10 PSO3 WK8, WK9
Overall Presentation Quality
Viva-Voce (30 Marks)
Understanding of Concepts
10 PO1, PO2, PO3 PSO1 WK1, WK2
and Technical Knowledge
Justification of Methodology
10 PO4, PO5, PO6 PSO2 WK3, WK5
and Results
Communication Skills,
10 PO9, PO10, PO11 PSO3 WK8, WK9
Confidence, and Clarity
Total Marks 100 Marks
Hands-on experience strengthens technical and problem-solving skills, making them ready
for industry challenges.
Students interact with professionals and mentors, expanding their industry network. This
exposure helps them explore various career paths, allowing for more informed decisions
about their future careers.
88
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
2021-2025 336
2022-2026 510
2023– 2027 504
WITH /
NO OF
S.NO COMPANY NAME WITHOUT
STUDENTS
STIPEND
1. TORRY HARRIS 1 Rs. 22,000/-
89
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
19. NSIC 7 -
22. Pantech 6 -
23. BSNL 5 -
24. Verzeo 3 -
34. R2 Technology 3 -
35. Livewire 1 -
90
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
38. Kodacy 2 -
45. TANSAM 2 -
46. Bsnl 2 -
47. Skillvertex 1 -
51. Codacy 4 -
54. Technook 1 -
56. Vlog 2 -
Vishay precision transducers india private
57 1 -
limited
58 Rowth Axis 1 -
91
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
WITH /
NO OF
S.NO COMPANY NAME WITHOUT
STUDENTS
STIPEND
1. LTIMindtree 6 Rs. 25,000/-
5. CMRL 2 -
6. Techciti Bangalore 1 -
16. CODERSCAVE 2 -
18. RETECH 1 -
19. InternPE 2 -
92
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
22. Devtown 1 -
24. Codsoft 4 -
26. TANSAM 11 -
29. InTrAinZ 4 -
30. TANSAM-SIEMENS 5 -
32. SEIL 1 -
33. Dewton 1 -
37. Acmegrade 1 -
39. IETE 1 -
93
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
WITH /
NO OF
S.NO COMPANY NAME WITHOUT
STUDENTS
STIPEND
1. CAMWARE TECHNOLOGIES LLP 2 -
4. CodeBind Technologies 2 -
7. NSIC 4 -
8. Codsoft 3 -
10. Internpe 2 -
11. Academor 1 -
14. S3 Electronics 1 -
17. CPCL 1 -
19. Elewayte 3 -
94
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
22. Sanmina 1 -
24. Cvrde 1 -
29. Bsnl 1 -
33. Corizo 1 -
NlcilNeyveli Lignite Corporation India
34. 1 -
Limited
35. Hyundai Motor India Limited 3 -
36. Elewayte 3 -
95
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
96
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
97
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
98
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
This internship feedback aims to gather insights on the overall experience and assess key
areas of the internship. The feedback covers the relevance of the tasks to academic studies,
the quality of work assigned, and the exposure to practical applications of theoretical
knowledge. Mentorship and support received throughout the internship are also evaluated,
alongside the work environment and team collaboration. The learning opportunities and skill
development during the internship are crucial aspects to be considered. Additionally, the
clarity of goals and expectations, as well as the feedback and guidance received, play an
important role in shaping the internship experience. The document also seeks an overall
satisfaction rating and recommendations for improvement. The aim is to enhance the
internship program for future participants. Feedback from interns is invaluable in
continuously improving the quality of the program. Finally, interns are asked whether they
would recommend the internship to others
99
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
100
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Employability Enhancement Courses (EEC) aim to bridge the gap between academic knowledge and
real-world applications. These courses include Seminars and Mini Project Work (21EC1713 - Mini
Project), enhancing practical skills and employability. EEC courses involve 2 periods of activities
with 1 credit assigned. These courses develop key competencies like problem-solving, teamwork, and
communication. By participating, students gain valuable industry exposure and strengthen their
foundation for future careers.
2.4.1 Seminar
The seminar process begins with the allocation of a Seminar Coordinator, who is responsible for
organizing and overseeing all seminar activities. The coordinator ensures that two dedicated hour per
week is allocated in the regular academic timetable for students to engage in research, discussion and
refinement of their presentations under faculty guidance.
Topic Selection: Students select seminar topics aligned with their academic interests and current
industry trends. The Seminar Coordinator ensures the topics address complex engineering problems,
fostering problem analysis (PO2). Seminar Coordinator approves the selected topics to integrate
engineering knowledge from mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering fundamentals (PO1,
WK1, WK2,WK3).
Research and Preparation: Students carry out research, collect data and prepare materials such as
reports, slides and demos. The Seminar Coordinator assists students in selecting appropriate
engineering tools and ensure adherence to academic and industry standards. This process encourages
interdisciplinary problem-solving and the application of modern engineering tools (PO5, PO2, WK2,
WK6).
Presentation and Q&A: Students deliver their presentations during the seminar session. The
Seminar Coordinator and peers engage in a Q&A session, allowing students to defend their work and
solutions. The Seminar Coordinator moderates the discussion, encouraging critical thinking and
problem-solving (PO2, PO9, PSO2).
101
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Faculty Evaluation and Continuous assessment: The Seminar carries 100 marks and is evaluated
through continuous assessment. Each student must give at least two presentations with marks equally
distributed among them. A three-member committee, including one coordinator and two department-
appointed members, evaluates the seminar. The final marks are based on the seminar report (40%),
presentation (40%), and response to questions (20%). (PO8, PO11)
This seminar process ensures that students gain academic knowledge and develop essential skills for
engineering careers and entrepreneurial pursuits, with seminar coordinator providing guidance at
every step. The two-hour seminar session supports research, collaboration and continuous
improvement in a structured learning environment. The process generally includes the following
steps:
102
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Table 2.4.1.1: Evaluation for Seminar
Seminar
Presentation / Demonstration
Presentation /
Seminar Report Response to Q&A Total
Demonstration
40 40 20 100
Table 2.4.1.2: Rubrics for Seminar
Seminar Evaluation (100 Marks)
(Based on Report, Presentation, and Q&A Response)
Response to
Seminar Report Presentation / Demonstration
Questions
(40) (40)
(20)
Clarity &
Clarity & Structure 10 10
Communication Accuracy &
10
Content Depth & Depth
10 Visuals & Aids 10
Relevance
Methodology & Demonstration / Case Confidence &
10 10
Analysis Study Explanation Logical 10
References & Citations 10 Time Management 10 Thinking
Needs
Excellent Good Average POs PSOs
Criteria Improvement
(10 Marks) (7 Marks) (5 Marks) Mapped Mapped
(3 Marks)
Well-
structured,
logically Organized Basic Poorly
Clarity &
organized, but some structure structured
Structure PO10 PSO3
clear sections but lacks with weak
(10 Marks)
sections lack clarity. coherence. flow.
with proper
formatting.
Covers all Basic
Content Covers most Superficial
key aspects coverage
Depth & aspects but content with PO1,
with deep with PSO1
lacks depth
Relevance insights and little PO3
in some minimal
(10 Marks) strong relevance.
areas. depth.
references.
103
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Clearly
explains the
Methodology Basic Poorly
approach,
Methodology is included methodolo described
tools, and PO2, PSO2
& Analysis but lacks gy with methodology
data PO4
(10 Marks) clarity or minimal with weak
analysis
justification. analysis. analysis.
with proper
justification.
Proper
citations Minimal
References
from references,
References & included but Poor citation
credible lacks PO3,
Citations formatting or missing PSO1
sources, proper PO5
(10 Marks) is references.
following a citation
inconsistent.
standard format.
format.
104
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Needs
Excellent Good Average (5 POs PSOs
Criteria Improvement
(10 Marks) (7 Marks) Marks) Mapped Mapped
(3 Marks)
Provides
Answers Basic
clear, in-
Accuracy & are good answers Poor or
depth, and PO2,
Depth but lack with incorrect PSO1
well- PO4
(10 Marks) some minimal responses.
reasoned
depth. justification.
answers.
Confident
Confidence Confident but some Some
Unclear or
& Logical responses answers hesitation PO6,
hesitant PSO3
Thinking with logical lack and weak PO9
responses.
(10 Marks) explanations. strong reasoning.
reasoning.
Table 2.4.1.3: Mapping Table for the Seminar Evaluation Criteria with Program Outcomes
(POs), Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs), and Knowledge and Attitude Profiles (WKs)
PO1: Engineering
Knowledge (Apply
WK1: Knowledge of
engineering knowledge to
PSO1: Research natural sciences and
solve complex problems)
and Innovation engineering
(Develop structured knowledge
PO2: Problem Analysis
and research-based
(Analyze problems using
reports) WK4: Research and
Seminar fundamental principles)
40 investigation
Report
PSO2: Problem-
PO10: Communication
Solving Skills WK6: Use of modern
(Effective report writing and
(Analyze and solve tools
documentation)
interdisciplinary
problems) WK8: Critical
PO12: Lifelong Learning
thinking
(Engage in continuous
learning and research)
105
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
PO9: Communication PSO1: Research
(Deliver structured and clear and Innovation WK3: Designing
presentations) (Develop structured solutions
and professional
PO10: Communication presentations) WK5: Understanding
(Engage effectively with societal impact
Presentation 40 technical and non-technical PSO3: Successful
audiences) Career and WK7: Teamwork
Entrepreneurship and collaboration
PO11: Project Management (Enhance public
and Finance (Organize and speaking and WK9: Effective
present information in a presentation skills presentation structure
professional manner) for career growth)
2021-2025 336
2022-2026 510
106
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
S.
Register No Name of the Student Seminar Topics Relevance of PO’s / PSO’s
No
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
2 211422106003 ABARNA E Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
107
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
8 211422106019 AISHWARYA S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
11 211422106029 AMIRTHAVARSHINI P Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
108
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
17 211422106051 ASHIRA TAHREEM M Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
20 211422106054 ASHWITHA K Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
109
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
BELLAMKONDA
26 211422106067 Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
DEEPANA
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
29 211422106077 BHAVASHRI D Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
110
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
35 211422106086 CHARVII Y L Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
38 211422106108 DIVYAJYOTHI A L Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
111
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
44 211422106134 HARI KAVIYA S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
47 211422106143 HARINI J Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
112
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
53 211422106156 HEMA SHREE T Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
56 211422106163 INDHRALEKHA M Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
113
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
62 211422106189 KANISHKA R Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
65 211422106200 KAVIYA PRIYA R Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
114
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
71 211422106213 LAKSHAYA T Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
74 211422106222 LOGHITHAA G Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
115
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
80 211422106241 MAVUDURU MOUNIKA Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
83 211422106246 MIRUDHULA DEVI M Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
116
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
89 211422106271 NETHRAINI S N Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
92 211422106277 NITHYA GOPIKA K Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
117
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
98 211422106287 PAVITHRA MALYAA K Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
101 211422106293 POOJA R K Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
118
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
107 211422106318 PRIYA B Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
110 211422106322 PRIYAVATHANA G Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
119
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
116 211422106344 RISHITA M Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
119 211422106351 ROSHINI I Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
120
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
SAKTHI DHARSHANA
125 211422106364 Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
V
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
128 211422106386 SANMUGAPRIYA L Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
121
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
134 211422106407 SHANDHINI M Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
137 211422106228 M SINDHU Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
122
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
143 211422106430 SUBASRI R Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
146 211422106434 SUBHAHARINI P Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
123
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
152 211422106450 SWATHI S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
SYED SULTHANA PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
155 211422106454 Navigation Through Video
BEEVI A S WK9;
Processing
124
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
161 211422106495 YAMUNA SHRI K Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
164 211422106455 TAMIZHOLI T M Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
125
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
170 211422106191 KARISHMA D Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
173 211422106435 SUBHIKSHA E Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
126
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
179 211422106406 SHALINI S G Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
182 211422106469 USHAASREE B Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
127
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
188 211422106291 PIRAJAN S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
191 211422106310 PRAVINRAJ K Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
128
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
197 211422106265 NAVANTH RAJA B Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
200 211422106028 ALLWIN ROZER B Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
129
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
206 211422106158 HEMANTH V Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
209 211422106012 ADITHIYA G Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
130
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
215 211422106333 RAMA PRIYAN T Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
218 211422106461 THAMIZHSELVAN S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
131
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
224 211422106468 TONY STEPHEN M Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
227 211422106475 VASANTHARAJ V Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
132
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
233 211422106481 VIGNESH P Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
236 211422106485 VIKRAM S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
133
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
242 211422106491 VISHWAA B Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
245 211422106901 ARUN VENKATESH K Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
134
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
251 211422106334 RAMANA MOORTHY D Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
254 211422106340 RANJITH KUMAR R J Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
135
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
260 211422106349 ROSHAN R Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
263 211422106360 SACHIN P Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
136
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
269 211422106370 SAMPATH RAJU A M Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
272 211422106375 SANJAI KUMAR S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
137
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
278 211422106384 SANJAYRAJ N Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
281 211422106383 SANJAY V Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
138
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
287 211422106393 SARAVANAN M Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
290 211422106396 SASI PRAKASH P Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
139
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
296 211422106414 SINGARAVELAN C Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
299 211422106423 SRIKANTH S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
140
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
305 211422106438 SUDARSON V Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
308 211422106442 SURAJ S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
141
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
314 211422106906 PRAVEEN KUMAR A Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
317 211422106905 PANDI V Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
142
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
323 211422106225 LOKESH S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
326 211422106231 MAFAAZ SHAYAN M Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
143
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
MOHAMMED KAAMIL
332 211422106250 Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
G
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
335 211422106253 MOHAN RAJ S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
144
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
341 211422106261 MUTHU RISHIKASH S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
344 211422106266 NAVEEN KUMAR S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
145
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
350 211422106276 NITHIK AAKASH C S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
353 211422106290 PETCHIMUTHU R Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
146
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
359 211422106300 PRADHEESH J Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PRASANNA PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
362 211422106302 Navigation Through Video
VENKATESHAN K WK9;
Processing
147
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
368 211422106313 PREM KUMAR M Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
371 211422106317 PRITHIVIRAJ A Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
148
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
377 211422106329 RAGUL R Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
380 211422106907 SAI MANIKANDAN S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
149
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
386 211422106118 GOKUL G Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
389 211422106121 GOKULNATH S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
150
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
395 211422106127 GOVARTHANAN K Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
398 211422106130 GOWTHAM M P Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
151
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
404 211422106149 HARIPRASATH S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
407 211422106137 HARIHARAN G Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
152
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
413 211422106153 HARRISH S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
416 211422106160 HENRY RAJASEELAN S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
JANGAM
Gesture Recognition for PO1,PO2,PO5,PO6, PO9,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
419 211422106166 PUNDAREEKAKSHA
Contactless User Interfaces WK9;
MUNI
153
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
422 211422106169 JAYA CHANDRAN R Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
425 211422106178 JESLIN NJ Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
154
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
431 211422106187 KAMALESH P Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
434 211422106195 KARTHIKEYAN S G Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
155
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
440 211422106205 KISHORE KUMAR B Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
443 211422106212 KUMARAVEL R Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
156
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
449 211422106009 ABISHEK K Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
452 211422106013 ADWIN JANNES T Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
157
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
458 211422106022 AKASH E Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
461 211422106027 ALAGAPPAN C Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
158
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
467 211422106036 ANUJITH S Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
470 211422106041 ARAVINDHAN M Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
159
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
476 211422106057 ASSAN MUROSIN S R Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
479 211422106062 BALAJI B Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
160
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
485 211422106072 BHARATH M Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
488 211422106075 BHARATHI S Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO7,PO9,PO10PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
492 211422106085 CHANDRU V Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
161
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Image and Video Processing
494 211422106087 DAMODHARAN R Techniques PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
497 211422106091 DESMOND DILLON A R Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
162
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Defect Detection in
503 211422106099 DHEERAJ SINGH R Manufacturing Using Video PO1,PO2,PO4,PO5,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-WK9;
Streams
Autonomous Vehicle
PO1,PO3,PO6,PO7,PO11,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3;WK1-
506 211422106105 DINESH KUMAR C Navigation Through Video
WK9;
Processing
Students presented seminars on a variety of topics, demonstrating their knowledge and understanding. A selection of these presentations is
included as samples, reflecting key ideas and insights.
163
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
164
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
165
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
166
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
167
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
The mini project process begins with the allocation of a Mini Project Coordinator, who is
responsible for organizing and overseeing all project-related activities. The coordinator
ensures that two dedicated hours per week are allocated in the regular academic timetable for
students to engage in research, development, and refinement of their projects under faculty
guidance.
Project Topic Selection : Students select project topics aligned with their academic interests
and current industry trends. The Mini Project Coordinator ensures that the topics address real-
world engineering problems, fostering problem analysis (PO2). The selected topics should
integrate engineering knowledge from mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering
fundamentals (PO1, WK1, WK2, WK3).
Research and Development: Students conduct research, collect data, and begin developing
their mini projects. The Mini Project Coordinator assists students in selecting appropriate
engineering tools and methodologies, ensuring adherence to academic and industry standards.
This phase promotes interdisciplinary problem-solving and the application of modern
engineering tools (PO5, PO2, WK2, WK6).
Project Implementation: Students focus on designing, coding, and testing their projects by
applying engineering design principles and modern tools (WK3, WK6). The Mini Project
Coordinator provides continuous feedback to ensure that the design, functionality, and
technical documentation adhere to quality standards and industry practices. This phase
emphasizes engineering problem-solving, teamwork, and project management (PO3, PO5,
PSO2, WK7).
Faculty Evaluation and Continuous Assessment: The mini project carries 100 marks and is
evaluated through continuous assessment. Each student/team must present their progress in
168
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
multiple stages, with marks distributed among various evaluation components. A three-
member committee, including the Mini Project Coordinator and two department-appointed
faculty members, evaluates the Mini project. The final marks are based on the Mini Project
report (40%), presentation and demonstration (40%), and response to questions (20%). (PO8,
PO11)
This structured mini project process ensures that students apply their academic knowledge to
practical problems, enhancing their technical skills and preparing them for engineering careers
and entrepreneurial opportunities. The dedicated two-hour session per week supports research,
collaboration, hands-on development, and continuous improvement under faculty supervision.
The process generally includes the following steps:
169
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Presentation / Demonstration
Presentation /
Mini Project Report Response to Q&A Total
Demonstration
40 40 20 100
Needs
Excellent Good Average POs PSOs
Criteria Improvement
(10 Marks) (7 Marks) (5 Marks) Mapped Mapped
(3 Marks)
Well-
structured,
logically
Organized Basic Poorly
Clarity & organized,
but some structure structured
Structure (10 clear PO10 PSO3
sections but lacks with weak
Marks) sections
lack clarity. coherence. flow.
with proper
formatting.
170
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Covers all
Covers most Basic
Content key aspects Superficial
aspects but coverage
Depth & with deep content with PO1,
lacks depth with PSO1
Relevance insights and little PO3
in some minimal
(10 Marks) strong relevance.
areas. depth.
references.
Clearly
explains the Methodolog
Basic Poorly
approach, y is
Methodology methodolo described
tools, and included but PO2,
& Analysis gy with methodology PSO2
data lacks clarity PO4
(10 Marks) minimal with weak
analysis or
analysis. analysis.
with proper justification.
justification.
Proper
citations Minimal
References
from references,
References & included but Poor citation
credible lacks PO3,
Citations (10 formatting or missing PSO1
sources, proper PO5
Marks) is references.
following a citation
inconsistent.
standard format.
format.
171
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Demonstr
ation is Basic
Demonstrati
Demonstration / clear, demonstra Weak
on is good
Case Study well- tion with demonstration PO3, PSO2
but lacks
Explanation (10 explained, minimal with poor PO4
depth in
Marks) and technical explanation.
some areas.
technically details.
sound.
Well-
Poor time
paced
Slightly manageme Significantly
Time presentatio
exceeds or nt with exceeds or PO9, PSO3
Management n within
falls short of rushed or falls short of PO10
(10 Marks) the
time. dragged time.
allotted
sections.
time.
Needs
Excellent Good Average (5 POs PSOs
Criteria Improvement
(10 Marks) (7 Marks) Marks) Mapped Mapped
(3 Marks)
Provides
Answers Basic
Accuracy & clear, in-
are good answers Poor or PO2,
depth, and PSO1
Depth (10 but lack with incorrect
well- PO4
Marks) some minimal responses.
reasoned
depth. justification.
answers.
Confident
Confidence Confident but some Some
& Logical Unclear or PO6,
responses answers hesitation
hesitant PSO3
Thinking (10 with logical lack and weak PO9
responses.
Marks) explanations. strong reasoning.
reasoning.
2020-2024 200
2021-2025 110
2022-2026 156
172
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Table No.2.4.2.7: Mapping Mini Projects to POs/PSOs (2024-2025) - III Year (Samples)
PROJECTTYPE
S.No Register Name of the (APPLICATION,
Team members RELEVANCE
Numbers Supervisor PRODUCT,
Project title OF PO'S / RELEVANCE
RESEARCH,
REVIEW) PSO'S OF SDGs
1 211421106092 Harini.A
173
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
10 211421106037 S.B.Aswinya
14 211421106048 R.Brindha
SDG11:
211421106093 S.Harini ElectronicsVoting
15 PO1-PO11, SustainableCities
Machine using
PSO1,PSO2 andCommunities
211421106143 K.Kiruthika Arduino
16
174
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
211421106071 DIVYADHARSHINI
25
S
211421106136 KeerthanaSV
29 Web based
Remotely PO1-PO11, SDG13:Climate
30 211421106094 HariniS Monitoring PSO1,PSO2 Action
Dr.I.Poonguzhali APPLICATION Temperature
31 211421106118 kandulajahnavi
32 211421106174 R Mohanapriya
RFID-based SDG4:Quality
Dr.R.Manigandan APPLICATION AttendanceSystem Education
33 211421106127 KarunyaS PO1-PO11,
PSO1,PSO2
34 LavanyaPackianathan
Maria
211421106148
BharathiSubikshaS
35 211421106046
Robot for PO1-PO11, SDG11:
36 211421106059 DhanalakshmiN
surveillanceusing PSO1,PSO2
Dr.Kalaiyarasi.D APPLICATION
Raspberry Pi SustainableCities
37 211421106166 Manju Sri M
andCommunities
175
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
38 AbinayaK
211421106005
51 211421106047 R.BHAVYA
SustainableCities
53 211421106013 AFSANAN PO1-PO11, andCommunities
Dr.V.Aruna APPLICATION ContactlessDoorbell PSO1,PSO2
54 211421106053 DEEKSHIKASAIS
55 211421106024 ANISHAA
58 211421106022 AMIRTHAK
AurdinoUNO
63 211421106139 KIRTHIKAS
177
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Below are sample Mini Project Publication Certificates awarded to students. These
certificates acknowledge their efforts in successfully completing and publishing their
mini projects. They highlight the students' contributions to research and innovation
178
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
179
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Photographs displayed here showcase the project models and prototypes designed by
students. These models demonstrate their creativity, technical skills, and problem-
solving abilities. Each prototype highlights key functionalities and innovative features.
The projects represent practical applications of theoretical concepts learned. Sample
photographs of these student-designed prototypes are presented below.
180
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
181
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Impact Analysis of Seminar and Mini/Micro Project in the Student Centric View
182
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Employability Enhancement Courses (EEC) aim to bridge the gap between academic knowledge and
real-world applications. These courses include Case Studies and Real-Life Applications, enhancing
practical skills and employability. EEC courses involve 2 periods of activities with 1 credit assigned.
These courses develop key competencies like problem-solving, teamwork, and communication. By
participating, students gain valuable industry exposure and strengthen their foundation for future
careers.
The case study process begins with the allocation of a Case Study Coordinator, who is responsible
for organizing and overseeing all case study activities. The coordinator ensures that two dedicated
hours per week are allocated in the regular academic timetable for students to engage in research,
discussion, and refinement of their analysis under faculty guidance.
Selection of Case Study: Students select case studies aligned with their academic interests and
current industry trends. The Case Study Coordinator ensures the selected cases address complex
engineering problems, fostering problem analysis (PO2). The Coordinator approves the selected cases
to integrate engineering knowledge from mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering
fundamentals (PO1, WK1, WK2, WK3).
The selected case studies fall into three types, categorized by complexity levels:
183
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
3. Explanatory Case Study
Research and Analysis: Students carry out research, collect data, and prepare materials such as
reports, presentations, and demonstrations. The Case Study Coordinator assists students in selecting
appropriate engineering tools and ensures adherence to academic and industry standards. This process
encourages interdisciplinary problem-solving and the application of modern engineering tools (PO5,
PO2, WK2, WK6).
Development of Findings and Insights: Students focus on developing clear, organized, and
engaging presentations of their case studies. The Case Study Coordinator provides ongoing feedback
on the structure and clarity of the findings, with an emphasis on effective communication (PO9, WK9,
PSO3).
Presentation and Discussion: Students present their case study findings during the dedicated
session. The Case Study Coordinator and peers engage in discussions, allowing students to defend
their findings and proposed solutions. The Coordinator moderates the discussion, encouraging critical
thinking and problem-solving (PO2, PO9, PSO2).
Faculty Evaluation and Continuous Assessment: The case study carries 100 marks and is evaluated
through continuous assessment. Each student must present at least two case studies, with marks
equally distributed among them. A three-member committee, including one coordinator and two
department-appointed members, evaluates the case studies. The final marks are based on the case
study report (40%), presentation (40%), and response to questions (20%) (PO8, PO11).
This structured case study process ensures that students gain academic knowledge while developing
essential skills for engineering careers and entrepreneurial pursuits, with the Case Study Coordinator
providing guidance at every step. The one-hour session supports research, collaboration, and
continuous improvement in a structured learning environment.
184
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Fig. 2.5.1: Process flow for Case Study and Real Life Example
185
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Table 2.5.1.1: Evaluation for Case Study and Real Life Example
40 40 20 100
Table 2.5.1.2: Rubrics for Case Study and Real Life Example
Case Study Evaluation (100 Marks)
(Based on Report, Presentation, and Q&A Response)
186
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Clearly
explains the
approach, Methodology Poorly
Basic
Methodology tools, and is included described
methodology PO2,
& Analysis data but lacks methodology PSO2
with minimal PO4
(10 Marks) analysis clarity or with weak
analysis.
with proper justification. analysis.
justification
.
Proper
citations
from Minimal
References
References & credible references, Poor citation
included but PO3,
Citations sources, lacks proper or missing PSO1
formatting is PO5
(10 Marks) following a citation references.
inconsistent.
standard format.
format.
Well-designed
slides with Poorly
Slides are Basic slides
relevant designed
Visuals & Aids good but could with too much PO5,
visuals, graphs, slides with PSO2
(10 Marks) be more or too little PO10
and minimal little
engaging. text.
text. relevance.
Demonstration
Demonstration / Basic Weak
is clear, well- Demonstration
demonstration demonstrati
Case Study explained, and is good but
with minimal on with PO3, PO4 PSO2
Explanation technically lacks depth in
technical poor
(10 Marks) sound. some areas.
details. explanation
Poor time
Well-paced Slightly management Significantly
Time
presentation exceeds or with rushed or exceeds or PO9,
Management falls short
PSO3
within the falls short of dragged PO10
(10 Marks) allotted time. time. sections. of time.
187
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Table 2.5.1.2.3: Rubrics for Response to Questions (20 Marks)
Needs
Excellent Good Average POs PSOs
Criteria Improvement
(10 Marks) (7 Marks) (5 Marks) Mapped Mapped
(3 Marks)
Provides
Answers Basic
clear, in-
Accuracy & are good answers Poor or
depth, and PO2,
Depth (10 but lack with incorrect PSO1
well- PO4
Marks) some minimal responses.
reasoned
depth. justification.
answers.
Confident
Confidence Confident but some Some
Unclear or
& Logical responses answers hesitation PO6,
hesitant PSO3
Thinking (10 with logical lack and weak PO9
responses.
Marks) explanations. strong reasoning.
reasoning.
Table 2.5.1.3: Mapping Table for the Case Study and Real Life Example Rubrics with
Program Outcomes (POs), Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs), and Knowledge and Attitude
Profiles (WKs)
WK1: Knowledge of
PO1: Engineering
PSO1: Research natural sciences and
Knowledge (Apply
and Innovation engineering
engineering knowledge to
(Develop structured knowledge
solve complex problems)
and research-based
Case Study
reports) WK4: Research and
and Real Life PO2: Problem Analysis
40 investigation
Example (Analyze problems using
PSO2: Problem-
Report fundamental principles)
Solving Skills WK6: Use of modern
(Analyze and solve tools
PO10: Communication
interdisciplinary
(Effective report writing and
problems) WK8: Critical
documentation)
thinking
188
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Critical Thinking and Decision-Making: Case studies promote analytical thinking, helping
students evaluate solutions and make informed decisions.
Enhanced Learning and Industry Awareness: Real-life examples increase student
engagement and provide insights into industry practices and current trends.
Hands-On Experience and Ethical Awareness: Students gain practical experience, bridging
theory and practice while considering ethical issues in real-world contexts.
Innovation, Creativity and Research Skills: Students are encouraged to think creatively,
develop unique solutions, and strengthen their research and analytical abilities
189
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Table 2.5.1.4: Evidence for Case Study relevance with POs & PSOs
(ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-24)
PO1(Engineering Knowledge)
Casestudy on PO2(Problem Analysis)
Electromagnetic PO3(Design/Development of
21EC1301-
Fields in Solutions)
1. III Electromagnetic Wireless Power MEDIUM PO4(Conduct Investigations of
Fields Transfer and Complex Problems)
Communication PO10(Communication)
Systems PSO1(Professional Skills)
PSO2(Problem-Solving Skills)
PO1(Engineering Knowledge)
PO2(Problem Analysis)
PO3(Design/Development of
21EC1404- Solutions)
Casestudy on
Analog PO4(Conduct Investigations of
2. IV Railway crack MEDIUM
Integrated Complex Problems)
detection
Circuits PO6(The Engineer and Society)
PO10(Communication)
PSO1(Professional Skills)
PSO2(Problem-Solving Skills)
190
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
PO1(Engineering Knowledge)
PO2(Problem Analysis)
Casestudy on PO3(Design/Development of
PO1(Engineering Knowledge)
PO2(Problem Analysis)
PO3(Design/Development of
PO1(Engineering Knowledge)
PO2(Problem Analysis)
PO3(Design/Development of
21EC1701 - Case Study of
Solutions)
Embedded Brain Controlled
5. VII MEDIUM PO4(Conduct Investigations of
Systems and Car for disabled
Complex Problems)
Robotics persons
PO6(The Engineer and Society)
PO7(Environment and
Sustainability)
191
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
PO8(Ethics)
PO10(Communication)
PSO1(Professional Skills)
PSO2 (Problem-Solving Skills)
Table 2.5.1.5: Evidence for Real-Life Examples relevance with POs & PSOs
192
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
193
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
194
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
195
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
196
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
197
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
198
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
SWAYAM (Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds), NPTEL (National
Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning), and MOOC (Massive Open Online Courses)
are educational platforms designed to provide accessible, quality learning resources to
individuals, empowering them to pursue academic and professional growth at their own pace.
SWAYAM is an initiative by the Government of India to facilitate online learning, offering free
courses across various subjects. It covers everything from school to postgraduate level,
including fields like engineering, arts, management, and humanities. The platform collaborates
with top institutions like IITs, IIMs, and universities to offer these courses. This initiative helps
bridge the digital divide by making high-quality education accessible to learners regardless of
their geographical location.
NPTEL, a part of the Ministry of Education's initiative, focuses primarily on providing online
courses in engineering, technology, and science. Its courses are developed and delivered by
faculty from top institutions in India. NPTEL offers both undergraduate and postgraduate
courses, aiming to enhance technical education and skills among students and professionals
alike. The platform also provides certifications for those who successfully complete the courses,
adding value to their professional credentials.
MOOCs, in a broader sense, are online platforms that offer open access to educational content.
These courses are typically free or low-cost, and some well-known platforms include Coursera,
edX, and Udemy. MOOCs allow anyone with an internet connection to access high-quality
content created by leading educational institutions globally, making learning more flexible and
scalable.
199
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
SWAYAM, NPTEL, NASSCOM, and MOOC courses play a vital role in aligning with
Program Outcomes (POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs), providing students with
essential knowledge and skills and it maps to following POs and PSOs. PO1 (Engineering
Knowledge), These Platforms deliver foundational engineering knowledge, helping students
apply theoretical concepts to solve real-world problems across various engineering disciplines.
PO2 (Problem Analysis), Courses enhance students' problem-solving abilities by teaching
them to apply principles of mathematics and science, fostering critical analysis of complex
engineering challenges. PO3 (Design/Development of Solutions), Students are trained in
designing solutions for complex problems, with a focus on societal, environmental, and public
health considerations in real-world applications, PO5 (Modern Tool Usage), Create, select, and
apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including
prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the
limitations. PO12 (Lifelong Learning), The platforms encourage continuous self-learning,
equipping students with the skills to stay updated with evolving technologies throughout their
careers. In terms of PSO1 (Professional Skills), PSO2 (Problem Solving Skills), PSO3
(Successful Career and Entrepreneurship), they develop students' technical expertise, critical
thinking, and entrepreneurial abilities, preparing them for the workforce and successful professional
career.
200
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Confirm that course content aligns with professional elective / open elective
courses of curriculum as approved by DAC & HOD
Letter Grade O A+ A B+ B C
201
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
WK1,
PO1,
Self-Learning PSO1, WK2,
30 PO2,
NASSCOM - 806 - PSO2, WK3,
Hours PO3,
PSO3 WK10
PO12
202
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
No Of Total No Of
Academic Year Course Name Students Students
Certified Certified
2024-25 Programming in Java 5
(ODD) Introduction to Internet of Things 2
VLSI Design Flow: RTL to GDS 2
Introduction to Semiconductor Devices 1
14
Digital Circuits 1
Cloud Computing 1
Problem Solving Through Programming in C 1
C Programming and Assembly Language 1
2023-24 System Design Through Verilog 6
(ODD) 3
Microprocessors and Interfacing
Introduction to Machine Learning 3
Cloud Computing 2
Python for Data Science 1 19
Simulation of Comm. Systems using Matlab 1
Programming in Java 1
Introduction to Internet of Things 1
Cyber Security and Privacy 1
2022-23 Microprocessors and Interfacing 21
(EVEN) Cloud Computing 1
Programming in Java 2
Digital System Design 2
Analog Circuits 3
Python for Data Science 1
Python Programming 1 39
2022-23 Developing soft skills and personality 1
(ODD) Microprocessor and interfacing 1
Introduction to Internet Of Things 1
Problem Solving through Programming In C 1
Embedded System Design with ARM 3
C & C++ Programming 1
2021-22 Enhancing Soft Skills And Personality 1
(EVEN) Blockchain And Its Applications 1
Digital Electronic Circuits 2 06
Microprocessors And Microcontrollers 1
2021-22 Programming In Java 1
(ODD)
203
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
204
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Fig.2.6.3 NASSCOM Certification on Digital 101, Data Science for Beginners and
Developer Catalyst Program
205
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
206
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Uses of Self-Learning
Skill Enhancement: Learn new technologies, software tools, and industry best practices.
Career Growth: Earn globally recognized certifications that improve job prospects.
Flexible Learning: Study at convenience without time and location constraints.
Interdisciplinary Knowledge: Explore diverse subjects beyond academic curriculum.
Entrepreneurship Development: Acquire business acumen and innovation skills.
Lifelong Learning: Stay updated with evolving technologies and industry trends.
207
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Engineering students are required to analyse, design, and implement innovative solutions for real-world
complex engineering problems. These problems often involve multiple constraints, modern computational
techniques, and sustainability considerations, making them critical for industry and research
advancements.
To address complex engineering challenges, the curriculum is designed with various learning
methodologies:
1. Project-Based Learning
2. Problem-Based Learning
3. Capstone Projects
4. Integrated Design Projects
5. Hackathons & Technical Competitions
6. Patent Filing, Copyright & Research Contributions
A structured process ensures that all engineering problems tackled by students are mapped to SDG’s.
208
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
The following parameters define a problem as “complex” if it meets at least four out of seven criteria:
A structured approach to problem identification involves analysing literature, identifying gaps, and
understanding trends to define a novel problem. It includes problem definition, hypothesis formation, and
complexity assessment for technical soundness. Feasibility checks cover resources, ethics, and real-world
benchmarking. Refinement ensures generalizability and novelty. Case studies validate practical
significance and contribution.
209
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
This table highlights engineering solutions that address real-world challenges while aligning with
sustainable development objectives. It showcases subjects that integrate technical problem-solving with
environmental, economic, and social sustainability considerations, ensuring a balanced approach to
innovation and long-term impact.
210
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
211
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
212
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
213
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
214
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
215
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Table: 2.7.2 Award-Winning Projects Done by Students from Expos and Hackathons and Alignment with SDGs
Justification
SL. RELEVANCE
Register No. Name of the Student Project Title Award Details
NO. TO SDG GOALS
216
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
217
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
218
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
219
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Enhances
211419106108 K.S JANANI DESIGN AND 6th International Conference On telecommunicatio
SDG: 9 -
PERFORMANCE Intelligent Computing n systems by
Industry,
211419106126 R.KAVIPRIYA Design of Tri- ANALYSIS OF A (IConIC2K23), Panimalar enabling efficient
Innovation,
1 Band Branch TRI-BAND Engineering College, Chennai, frequency
Line Coupler and
COUPLER FOR https://www.atlantis- division, critical
Infrastructure
RFAPPLICATION press.com/proceedings/icic-6- for modern
.
S 23/125993033 communication
211419106137 V.KIRUTHIKA networks.
220
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
221
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
222
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Coding abilities and competitions serve as vital instruments for tackling environmental issues, and
excelling in competitions highlights skills in problem-solving, creativity, and technical know-how—each
of which can play a key role in advancing sustainability initiatives.
223
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
IEEE SDG 8:
Best
Computer Decent Work
6 Mr. Dheeraj Ambassador Winner
Society at & Economic
Award
CSIS 2024 Growth
Ms. Shandhini M,
Ms. Shahana M, Ms.
IETE BEST SDG 8:
Logashree S, Ms. IETE
STUDENT Decent Work
7 Loghithaa G, Ms. Winner Chennai
VOLUNTEER & Economic
Oviya S, Ms. Centre
AWARD Growth
Nirosha D & Ms.
Subhaharini P
SDG 4:
Quality
R.M.K. Education,
One Piece
8 Ms. Kondru Lakshmi Winners, Engineering SDG 9:
(Tech Bug)
College Industry,
Innovation &
Infrastructure
SDG 4:
Quality
Winner,
R.M.K Education,
Ms. Premi Sree Priya received
9 Tech Thesis Engineering SDG 9:
TS cash prize
College Industry,
and shield
Innovation &
Infrastructure
SDG 4:
Quality
Runner,
R.M.K Education,
received
10 Ms. Kiruthika P Tech Thesis Engineering SDG 9:
cash prize
College Industry,
and shield
Innovation &
Infrastructure
224
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Fig.2.7.6 – Team Green Pioneers, Winners-Grand Finale of Smart India Hackathon 2024 -
Hardware Edition held at KIET Group of Institutions
225
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Fig.2.7.7 -Team Aviator Won the Best Innovation Award at Hack -O-Holics Hackathon at St.
Josephs Institute of Technology
226
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Social Impact: Sustainable engineering enhances access to vital resources like clean water,
energy, and education, promoting social responsibility and inclusivity. This ensures equitable
resource distribution, fostering healthier communities and reducing inequalities.
Economic Impact: Sustainability in engineering leads to long-term cost savings despite higher
initial investments by improving energy consumption, material efficiency, and waste management.
It also supports local economies, contributing to economic resilience and new market
opportunities.
227
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
228
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
development programs further prepare students for the workforce. These efforts bridge the
gap between academia and industry, ensuring that students are well-equipped for successful
careers.
Table 2.8.1 : Industry-Institute Initiatives Mapping With POs, PSOs and WKs
Industry-
PSO
Institute PO Mapped WK Mapped Justification
Mapped
Initiatives
Industry experts provide real-
Course
PO1, PO2, PSO1, WK1, WK2, world insights, aligning
Delivery by
PO3, PO6, PSO2, WK3, WK4, curricula with industry
Industry
PO9, PO11 PSO3 WK5, WK7 demands and developing
Experts
problem-solving skills.
Industry- PO1, PO2, PSO1, WK1, WK2, Hands-on experience with
Supported PO3, PO4, PSO2, WK3, WK4, state-of-the-art tools enhances
Labs PO5, PO11 PSO3 WK5, WK6 technical and analytical skills.
Exposure to real-world
WK1, WK2,
PO1, PO2, PSO1, engineering environments
Industrial WK3, WK4,
PO5, PO6, PSO2, strengthens practical
Visits WK5, WK6,
PO9, PO11 PSO3 knowledge and networking
WK7
opportunities.
PO1, PO2, WK1, WK2, Experts provide insights on
PSO1,
Guest Lectures PO3, PO4, WK3, WK4, emerging trends and practical
PSO2,
& Workshops PO6, PO9, WK5, WK6, applications, improving
PSO3
PO11 WK7, WK8 lifelong learning.
Specialized training equips
PO1, PO2, WK1, WK2,
Short-term PSO1, students with essential
PO3, PO4, WK3, WK4,
Training & PSO2, technical skills and industry
PO5, PO9, WK5, WK6,
Certifications PSO3 certifications.
PO11 WK7, WK8
Industry WK1, WK2,
PO1, PO2, Ensures curricula stay updated
Advisory PSO1, WK3, WK4,
PO3, PO4, with industry trends, improving
Board & PSO2, WK5, WK6,
PO6, PO9, employability and project
Curriculum PSO3 WK7, WK8,
PO10, PO11 management skills.
Design WK9
Encourages innovation, critical
PO1, PO2, WK1, WK2,
PSO1, thinking, and research-based
Joint Research PO3, PO4, WK3, WK4,
PSO2, problem-solving using modern
Projects PO5, PO9, WK5, WK6,
PSO3 tools.
PO10, PO11 WK7, WK8
PO1, PO2, WK1, WK2,
PO3, PO4, PSO1, WK3, WK4, Formal collaboration enhances
MOUs with
PO5, PO6, PSO2, WK5, WK6, internships, project work, and
Industries
PO8, PO9, PSO3 WK7, WK8, research opportunities.
PO10, PO11 WK9
PO1, PO2,
WK1, WK2, Encourages creativity,
Industry- PO3, PO4, PSO1,
WK3, WK4, teamwork, and real-world
Sponsored PO5, PO6, PSO2,
WK5, WK6, problem-solving in
Hackathons PO8, PO9, PSO3
WK7, WK8 competitive environments.
PO10, PO11
229
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
PO1, PO2,
WK1, WK2,
PO3, PO4, Provides technical and soft
Skill PSO1, WK3, WK4,
PO5, PO6, skills training, preparing
Development PSO2, WK5, WK6,
PO7, PO8, students for industry roles and
Programs PSO3 WK7, WK8,
PO9, PO10, entrepreneurship.
WK9
PO11
PO1, PO2, WK1, WK2, Provides hands-on experience
PO3, PO4, PSO1, WK3, WK4, in a professional setting,
Industry
PO5, PO6, PSO2, WK5, WK6, improves problem-solving
Internships
PO8, PO9, PSO3 WK7, WK8, skills, and enhances
PO10, PO11 WK9 employability.
PO1, PO2,
WK1, WK2, Provides cutting-edge
Centre of PO3, PO4, PSO1,
WK3, WK4, research, skill development,
Excellence PO5, PO6, PSO2,
WK5, WK6, and advanced technical
(CoE) PO9, PO10, PSO3
WK7, WK8 training in specialized areas.
PO11
Partial delivery of courses within the curriculum is a collaborative approach where industry
professionals co-create and deliver specific course modules, ensuring that students gain
practical, industry-relevant insights. These experts bring up-to-date knowledge and real-world
experience, enhancing the learning process through guest lectures and interactive workshops.
This partnership bridges the gap between academic theory and the skills required in the
workplace, integrating industry-driven content into core subjects to help students understand
the practical applications of their learning. The inclusion of alumni connects students to real-
life career experiences, offering mentorship and networking opportunities, further enhancing
their employability. This dynamic model ensures that the curriculum remains responsive to
evolving market demands, equipping graduates with both technical knowledge and industry-
ready skills, preparing them for the challenges of the modern workforce.
230
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Batch 2-
11.09.24 -
12.09.24
Batch 3-
18.09.24 -
19.09.24
Batch 4-
20.09.24 -
21.09.24
Mr. Ranjith Kumar Workshop Arduino 4days
21EC1404 Crystal Clear PCB Design 29.05.23 –
Analog Integrated Technology and and 01.06.23
Circuits Innovation, Programming
Coimbatore
21EC1604 Mr. Sri Balaji Workshop Network 1 day
Data Aravind, CoFounder engineering with 15.10.2023
Communication of Arjun Vision Tech drone simulation
Networks Solutions &
Professional Training
Service provider at
NSIC, Chennai
21EC1701 Mr. Ranjith Kumar Workshop Workshop on IoT 4 days
Embedded Director, CCTI, and Hands on using Adruino 29.05.23 –
systems and Coimbatore. training with Real time 01.06.23
Robotics projects
Mr.Kesavan, CEO of Workshop - Mastering ML 2 days
21EC1401- Qriocity algorithms 30.08.23 -
Artificial 31.08.23
Intelligence and
Machine Learning
(Lab Integrated)
21EC1302 Mr. Ranjith Kumar Workshop and Advanced PCB 3 days
Electronic Director, CCTI, Hands on Design and Batch1-
Circuits Coimbatore. training Fabrication 20.09.23 –
22.09.23
Batch2-
25.09.23 –
27.09.23
Dr.E.Arun Kumar Workshop Real Time 2days
21EC1502- Vice President Signal 25.09.23 –
Digital Signal Retech Solutions Pvt Processing using 27.09.23
Processing Ltd Raspberry Pi
Mr.Naveen, Robotics Workshop Learn Machine 2days
21EC1401- Archietect, Learning with Batch1-
Artificial Pragrobotics Pvt KNIME” 26.09.23-
Intelligence and limited 27.09.23
Machine Learning Batch 2-
(Lab Integrated) 18.10.23-
19.10.23
Mr.B.Krishnakumar 2 days
21EC1603 VLSI Technical Head, Hands-on Chip Level Batch1-
and Chip Design New Technology, training Testing & 08.01.24 -
231
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Fig 2.8.1.1 Workshop on Chip Level Testing and Debugging for Mobile
232
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Industry-supported labs play a crucial role in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge
and practical application for students. These labs are equipped with state-of-the-art tools,
233
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
technologies, and equipment provided by industry partners, ensuring that students work with
the latest advancements used in the professional world. Industry collaboration in setting up
labs offers students hands-on experience in real-world environments, enhancing their technical
and problem-solving skills.
Lab Lab
Collaboration Lab Name Industry Equipment/ Objectives
Partner Resources
Provided
Circuits and 21EC1404 Exotic Power SMPS The primary
Simulation Lab Analog solutions objective of an SMPS
I & II Integrated Pvt.Ltd is to efficiently
Circuits convert electrical
power from one form
to another while
ensuring a stable and
regulated output
voltage or current for
powering electronic
devices.
Electronics 23EC1311- Flextronics Re- PCB design and
Circuits- PCB Electronic workstation Circuit board design
Circuits and
simulation Lab
I
Industry-offered short-term programs and training are crucial for strengthening Industry-
Institute Partnerships by equipping both students and faculty with specialized, up-to-date
knowledge. These industry-sponsored certification courses in emerging technologies enable
students to acquire cutting-edge skills in a short time, ensuring they are job-ready. Faculty
members also benefit from executive training programs, keeping them informed about the latest
industry trends and technological advancements.
This collaboration provides students with valuable hands-on experience while allowing faculty
to integrate real-world industry knowledge into their teaching. Additionally, these programs
offer students opportunities to network with industry professionals, creating connections that
can enhance their future career prospects. By aligning educational curricula with industry
needs, such partnerships ensure that students are well-prepared to tackle the challenges of the
evolving job market.
234
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
235
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
design and
embedded
programming.
Industry Workshop on IoT CCIT 29.05.23 – The "Workshop on
supported using Adruino Coimbatore 01.06.23 (4 IoT Using Arduino
Hands on with Real time Days) with Real-Time
Training projects Projects" aims to
teach participants the
basics of IoT and
Arduino, hands-on
programming,
sensor integration,
and communication
protocols, while
enabling them to
build and implement
real-time IoT
projects like smart
systems and data-
driven devices.
Hands on JAVA Bootcamp 360 Ripples 31.05.23 – This workshop aims
Training Solutions, 02.05.23 and to provide
Chennai. 27.07.23- participants with a
28.07.23 (5 comprehensive
Days) understanding of
core Java
programming,
object-oriented
concepts, and hands-
on experience in
building real-world
applications,
preparing them for
software
development roles.
workshop Workshop on Pantech e 10.08.23 & The "Workshop on
Robotics Design Learning, 11.08.23 (2days) Robotics Design"
Chennai aims to teach
participants the
fundamentals of
robotics, including
mechanical design,
electronics,
programming, and
sensor integration,
while enabling them
to build and control
functional robotic
systems.
workshop Workshop on GUVI 18.08.23 (1day) The workshop aims
“Exploring the to provide
Frontiers of participants with an
Generative AI; understanding of the
From theory to fundamentals of
Applications” generative AI, its
underlying models
236
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
237
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
and industry-
standard
methodologies for
PCB design and
hands-on
experience in PCB
fabrication.
Industry- Workshop on RETECH 25.09.23 – The objective of the
collaborated Real Time Signal SOLUTIONS 27.09.23 (2days) Workshop on Real-
Workshop Processing using PVT LTD Time Signal
Raspberry Pi Chennai Processing using
Raspberry Pi is to
provide participants
with hands-on
experience in
implementing and
analyzing real-time
signal processing
applications. It
focuses on
leveraging the
Raspberry Pi
platform to process
audio, video, and
sensor signals,
enabling participants
to design and deploy
efficient, real-time
systems for practical
and research
purposes.
Industry- Workshop on Pragrobotics Pvt Batch1-26.09.23- he objective of the
collaborated Learn Machine limited 27.09.23 "Learn Machine
Hands-on Learning with Batch 2- Learning with
training KNIME” 18.10.23- KNIME" workshop
19.10.23 (2days) is to introduce
participants to
machine learning
concepts, familiarize
them with the
KNIME Analytics
Industry- Workshop on Retech SolutionsBatch 1-
collaborated Arduino with IoT Pvt Ltd 11.10.23 –
Hands-on 13.10.23
training Batch 2:
16.10.23 –
18.10.23
(2days)
Industry- Hands-on New Technology, Batch 1-08.01.24 To enhance the
certification training on Coimbatore -09.01.24 practical skills in
Hands-on Chip Level & diagnosing and
training Testing & Batch2-10.01.24 resolving hardware
Debugging for all -11.01.24 and software issues
Mobile Devices & at the chip level,
Batch3- enhancing their
238
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
23.01.24- expertise in
24.01.24 repairing, testing,
(2days) and maintaining
various mobile
device components
effectively
Industry- Hands-on New Technology, Batch 1-21.09. To enhance the
certification training on Coimbatore 22-22.09.22 practical skills in
Hands-on Chip Level & diagnosing and
training Testing & Batch2-26.09. resolving hardware
Debugging for all 22-27.09.22 and software issues
Mobile Devices & at the chip level,
Batch3- enhancing their
02.01.23- expertise in
03.01.23 repairing, testing,
(2days) and maintaining
various mobile
device components
effectively
Industry- Workshop on New Technology, Batch 1- The objective of the
certification “Laptop Fault Coimbatore 28.02.23- Laptop Fault
Hands-on Finding & 01.03.23 Finding &
training Troubleshooting Batch2- Troubleshooting
with Hardware & 02.03.023 - with Hardware &
Software 04.03.23 Software Servicing
servicing” (2days) workshop is to equip
participants with
practical skills to
diagnose, repair, and
maintain laptops
effectively. It
focuses on
identifying hardware
and software issues,
understanding laptop
architecture, and
implementing
solutions to ensure
optimal performance
and reliability.
239
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
240
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
241
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
242
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
243
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
244
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
245
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
246
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
● Internships
● Value added Courses
● Project assistance
Short term training programs for students
Pantech E-Learning From To Provide:
20.07.2023 – ● Industrial training
valid for 5 years ● Internships
5.
● Value added Courses
● Project assistance
Short term training programs for students
Retech Solutions From To Provide:
Pvt.Ltd 26.07.2023- ● Industrial training
valid for 5 years ● Internships
6.
● Value added Courses
● Project assistance
Short term training programs for students
AR Global From To Provide:
automation and 28.07.2023- ● Industrial training
Instrumentation Valid for 5 ● Internships
7. years ● Value added Courses
● Project assistance
Short term training programs for students
Zeal Industries From Benefiting all the stakeholders of talent
04.08.2023 – ecosystem for project proposal and
8.
valid for 3 years research opportunities for obtaining
research skill
DADB India Private From To Provide
Limited 18.08.2023- ● German academy of Digital
valid for 3years Education GmbH
9. ● LI Lab
Academic collaboration in terms of
DADB supporting the institution in
developing the curriculum nd content for
the value added courses
Chase Research From To Provide:
Development and 19.10.2023- ● Industrial training
Solutions Valid for 5 ● Internships
10. years ● Value added Courses
● Project assistance
Short term training programs for students
Wearable MEMES From To Provide:
Private Limited 08.02.2024- ● Project assistance
11. Valid for 5 ● Research assistance
years Short term training program for students.
247
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
248
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
249
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
250
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
251
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
A Centre of Excellence (CoE) with Industry Collaboration serves as a hub for innovation,
research, and skill development, bridging the gap between academia and industry. These centers
focus on emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Data Science,
IoT, and Cloud Computing, providing students and professionals with hands-on training, real-
world projects, and industry exposure. By partnering with leading companies, CoEs facilitate
knowledge transfer, foster entrepreneurship, and drive cutting-edge research to solve industry
challenges. They play a crucial role in upskilling the workforce, enhancing employability, and
promoting industry-driven innovation for sustainable growth.
1.
Centre of
PO1,PO2,PO5,PO9,PO11,PO1
Excellence
2,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3
in Robotics
2.
Centre of
PO1,PO2,PO3,PO9,PO11,PO1
Excellence for
2,PSO1,PSO2
Drones
252
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
3.
Centre of
Excellence in
Electronic
PO1,PO2,PO5,PO9,PO11,PO1
Service &
2,PSO1,PSO2,PSO3
Manufacturing
Flextronics
Lab
253
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Nadu 600056,
Ph.098402 30903
254
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
255
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Gandhipuram,
Coimbatore,
Tamilnadu –
641012.
15 Dr. J. Design and Qmax Systems 7 months 0.55
Jeneetha Mrs. N. Development of India Pvt. Ltd,
Jebanazer Pritha Ultra wide band 795, Trunk Road,
Printed Antenna Poonamallee,
Chennai, Tamil
Nadu 600056,
Ph.098402 30903
16 Dr.L.Ashok Antenna Exotic Power 8 months 0.62
Kumar Dr. V. measurements Solution Pvt.Ltd,
JeyaRamya 5th sector,
KK nagar,
Chennai.
17 Dr.J.Navaraja SBAN for Athletes Anshumam Tech. 6 months 0.58
n Dr. Pvt. Ltd,
A.Selvarani Plot No.13,
Stahairya Society,
Near Tol Hospital,
Karve Nagar,
Pune 411052
18 Dr.B.Bhuvanesw Ms.R.Monis Electric Vehicle Qmax Systems 13 months 0.52
ari ha Controller Unit India Pvt. Ltd,
795, Trunk Road,
Poonamallee,
Chennai, Tamil
Nadu 600056.
19. Dr.G.Elumala Design of S band Qmax Systems 13 months 0.51
i - antenna for India Pvt. Ltd,
Bluetooth 795, Trunk Road,
application Poonamallee,
Chennai, Tamil
Nadu 600056.
20 Dr. S. Leones Mr. R.Ashok Intelligent Vehicle New Technology 8 months 0.54
Sherwin Tracking System 613,Singanallur
Vimalraj with Cloud Based Main Bus Stand,
Geo-Position Kamarajar Road,
Monitoring System Singanallur,
Coimbatore,
Tamilnadu –
641015
21 Dr. S.Deepa Mrs. Smart members Pantech – E 6 months 0.52
B.Sathyabha counter for Godown Learning,
ma and mess hall #26, Kotta
Srinivasiah
Charities Building ,
Thanjavur Road,
Behind canara
bank, Near
Duraisamy
Subway,
T. Nagar,
Chennai – 17.
256
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
22. Dr. J.Jeneetha Dr. Design and Exotic Power 8 months 0.60
Jebanezar C.Ramesh development of UPS Solution Pvt.Ltd,
kumar 5KVA online 120 V 5th sector,
DC Single phase KK nagar,
output AC of 220V Chennai.
257
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Karve Nagar,
Pune 411052
258
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
259
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
260
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
261