• Please also see our FOIA request attached.

The POC turned our request over to the police who

did this to us which means we have the fox guarding the hen house. We need an outside agency
not affiliated or works for the United States Inc helping us otherwise, our request wont go
anywhere! This is the problem with the entire system, the FOX GUARDS THE HEN HOUSE!. By
corporate and international law, and 15 USC 1 TRADE, everyone must be bonded/insured 1
Million dollars and the PRIME CONTRACTORS (VATICAN, QUEEN, LORD MAYOR, BLACK ROCK
AND DOD) must be bonded/insured 100 million. See LEIN which justice anna assisted. As per
the clearfield doctrine, you must be transparent, hence the reason I am ccing the 200 Military
Command's PAO as our case is a public interest case. We see the CORVIAS has been sued
before ref: Failure to do their job! I mention this, because we all know that contractors who work
in AMERICAS cannot collect TAX DOLLARS FUNDS AND DENY ADA RIGHTS! Hence the reason I
cc'd the Department of Labor. Also, DOJ informed us in writing that NOBODY has their oath. If
nobody has their oath of office, how can your organization be legal (See attached: 1990 ADA
Reasonable Accommodation to the USA INC and DOD foreign CORP 28 USC 3002 | PDF | Birth
Certificate | Bankruptcy Everyone on this list has a DUE DILIGENCE to stop the United States Inc
and the United States of America CRIMES against us AMERICANS RIGHT GENERAL HONORE,
SEE SOMETHING, DO SOMETHING! This request is done under TITLES II and III of the 1990 ADA
ACt which means NOBODY GETS IMMUNITY AND WHEN ANY MAN MADE POLICY VIOLATES
YOUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS, IT CAN BE CHANGED RIGHT ON THE SPOT SO THE UNITED STATES
INC AKA VA COMPANY OF LONDON AKA BLACK ROCK INC CANNOT INTERFERE WITH GOD
GIVEN NATURAL LAW/THE LAW OF THE LAND!
THE PENALTY FOR TREASON IS STILL DEATH, WE TAKE NO PRISONERS , OTHERWISE, THE NEXT TIME THEY THINK ABOUT COMMITTING A
CRIME IT WILL BE YOU! THESE PEOPLE HAVE TAKEN NO OATH
 Proof that the United State Inc
(Military) is running a scam using
Article I Kangaroo Courts
PROOF THE UNITED STATES INC GENERALS & BLACKROCK ARE USING OUR OWN CHILDREN TO VIOLATE OUR RIGHTS –
OUR KIDS DON’T KNOW THEY ARE MOORS FROM AMERICAS
THE REASON THE UNITED STATES INC MILITARY AND BLACK ROCK ARE RETALIATING AGAINST US BECAUSE WE HAVE
THE RIGHT TO SUE LETTER SIGNED BY THEIR GENERAL COUNSELOR. ALL CLAIMS ARE LOOKED IN THE ARMY/DOD’S
SAFE SERVER WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN SETTLED BY COMMERCE LAW IN 2018
The Right to sue the corporation letter signed by the GENERAL COUNSELOR will not go away until every MOOR from Americas is healed by the United
States Inc and the United States of America (Military) See General Order 2014 which proves the USA INC is a FOREIGN ENTITY

AND THEIR RULES DON’T Apply to any of us – we have a right to protect ourselves against USA INC TRAITORS
 The United States Inc
Corporation cannot touch a
criminal case
THE PENALTY FOR TREASON AND FOR KILLING MY ADA DOG IS STILL DEATH GENERAL JOE
DUNFORD - GET YOUR MEN
Kirchhoefer
 The United States Inc can NEVER TOUCH A
MILITARY COURT, IF that is a fact, how come we
have a fake criminal case in 2019 and 2025? Same
game don’t work General Joe Dunford and General
Milley
How can Voncelle Lie and say I have
weapons in my car, I was not there issuing
her the summons? Oh and by the way the
State of Md INC’s policy states that you can
not retaliate against a process server and or
an ADA Advocate – We call BS!
ON 9 June GS14 pawn Voncelle
James wants to process criminal
charges against using a third
party’s video?????
She wants to make us criminals and wants
us to pay $1,000 and go to jail for 90 days to
dismiss our higher court case against the
United States of American INC THE
CORPORATION (28 USC 3002)
The United States Inc’s Attorneys Office
and the Judges got paid under the table
to violate their oath they don’t have?
They cannot touch a criminal case due
to the Clearfield doctrine
18 USC 111
18 USC 111
 They have my
son write his last
4 so they can
cash out on his
BID BOND?
Hello Sue,
Every military member without an SF61 on file has never been appointment to public office; and,
The Oath of office we take is a forgery and we never took the oath, the SSN NAME NUMBER took the oath
making all the humans war criminals not covered by sovereign authority (IMHO)

The AF 5331 oath below violates the statutory oath via all caps "SO HELP ME GOD"
The "PERSON" taking the OATH is my SSN-NAME & SSN-Number ; I just witnessed the Social Security
Card taking the oath;
See the First Attachment
Kind Regards
Sean Scott Haggerty
602.815.8062
San Tan Valley A
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm

I sent off an SF-180 to get all of any oaths of office and I included a demand for all of any SF61/61b [even
though the 61b was apparently discontinued meaning any appointee would have their
acknowledgment and acceptance on file > implicating that THEY could appoint anyone to any office without
their knowledge [?] . The OPM testifies there is no SF61 on file, which means
I have never held public office and therefore I have never engaged in a Trade and Business [26 Sec
7701(26)] and therefore I have never earned Wages and I have never earned "Income"
#1 OPM SF180 Records Request
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/order/standard-form-180.pdf
If never in the military, put:
"Ready Reserve" in the BRANCH OF SERVICE column on line 5(b),
find your Selective Service Number online, and put that number under the
SERVICE NUMBER column or if no Selective Service Number then SSN

In Section II of the SF180

#1. Other put "every SF61 of mine or a certificate of non-existence
#2. I selected all of them but Geneology

No SF61 > I never held Public Office >

No Public Office > No Trade and Business 26 Sec 7701 >
No trade and business > No Employee Income >
No Employee Income > NO TAX LIABILITY
2 Title 27 Taxable Events
6-4.270 - Criminal Division Responsibility
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270

The Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is responsible for prosecuting persons who have
committed the following tax-related offenses:
liquor tax
narcotics
stamp tax
firearms
wagering
coin-operated gambling and amusement machines
malfeasance offenses that IRS personnel have committed
forcible rescue of seized property
corrupt or forcible interference with an officer or employee acting under the internal revenue laws (but
not omnibus clause)
counterfeiting, mutilation, removal, or misuse of stamps
See 28 C.F.R. §§ 0.55, 0.70
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270
#3 Clayton Act forms authorizing withholding
Additional information about the Treasury Department’s FOIA program is available at
www.treasury.gov/FOIA
Commentary: You can challenge the assessment's authenticity and the authenticity of the basis of the assessment - all those 1099, 1040, or W-2
forms by which people fraudulently claimed (without signing under penalty of perjury as 26 USC 6065
requires) you earned taxable income.

Since the employer has not a Withholding Agent Certificate- it's a crime. The IRS literature identifies “withholding agents”. Private employers
are not defined as withholding agents
except in connection with foreign activities, etc. The authority of a Withholding Agent (defined in § 7701(a) 16, 26CFR §301.7701-16) to
withhold from one’s pay or remuneration IRC §§1441,1442,1443, and
specifically in 26 CFR §1.1411-7) applies to nonresident aliens. It does not apply to YOU. A Withholding Agent is required to have the specific
Form 2678 on file with the IRS to be legally authorized to withhold
from my earnings for the IRS. Or Form 8655 Reporting Agent Authorizing Certificate from the Treasury Financial Management Service…has
executed one of these forms, 2678 or 8655 specific to YOU, as this is the only authority to withhold by a Withholding Agent as found in the Law.
For they, theses forms, do not apply to you since you are neither a nonresident alien nor a foreign fictitious Entity…. Or are you?

Government is not partly public or partly private, depending upon the governmental pedigree of the type of a particular activity or the manner
[332 U.S. 380 , 384] in which the Government conducts it. The Government may carry on its operations through conventional executive
agencies or through corporate forms especially created for defined ends. See Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 306 U.S. 381, 390,
518.

All federal tax forms are only applicable to the following circumstances:
• Direct financial involvement with the United States government.
• Payments made/received from certain federally regulated financial markets.
• Foreign business activities in the United States.
• Conducting domestic business in certain federally regulated businesses (Subtitle D & E matters).
The IRS does not have lawful authority or jurisdiction to enforce the W4 “program” and the employer is not bound by law to submit any W4's to
the IRS. The United States Government Accounting Office report dated 9/15/03 stated in part, "Under current law, the IRS does not have
statutory authority to impose a penalty to enforce employer compliance with the reporting requirement. The reporting requirement was
promulgated in Treasury regulations." And we all know Treasury Regulations are not law!
The IRS created the income tax liability in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 26 CFR 1.1-1. Congress did not enact any liability statutes for
income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the IRC. Our fundamental Right to Separation of Powers means that only Congress can make law:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1

Check out UNITED STATES v. Lynda Wall and you will also find that those "Notices of Levy” are also legally considered "Counterfeit Securities"
The IRS would like you to believe that "INTERNAL Revenue Service" means Internal to these 50united States of America. TRUTH: Treasury
Delegation Order 150-10 published at 51 Fed. Reg. 9571 specifically states: "The Commissioner shall *to the extent of authority invested in him*,
provide for the administration of "the United States" (corporation) * internal *revenue laws *in theU.S. territories *and insular *possessions
*and other authorized areas of the *world." *NO MENTION of authority within these united States of America! And no definition of "other
authorized areas of the *world". *Does that encompass China, Saudi Arabia, Russia? We are left to "imagine" what it means, but the law is not
about what we "imagine"; the law is about what the law specifically and clearly spells out. One of the few places where income tax law is
specifically and clearly spelled out is Treasury Delegation Order 1150-42 published as 21 Fed. Reg. 5852: "The Commissioner shall, *to the extent
of authority invested in him, *provide for the administration of the United States (corporation) Internal revenue laws in the *Panama Canal
Zone, Puerto Rico, *and the *Virgin Islands." THAT *is the *extent *of their *Internal *Authority! Even the IRS' own definition of "Revenue
Agents" as spelled out by 27 CFR 250.11, is "Agents of the Dept. of Revenue *of Puerto Rico" They are NOT agents of Internal Revenue within the
fifty States united, except when and where they are dealing with Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and such government regulatable activities as that.*
You cannot be REQUIRED to surrender God-Given Unalienable Rights. Technically, you cannot even "volunteer" to give up Unalienable Rights.
The writers of the u.S. Constitution specifically used the word Unalienable to MANDATE that government not impair or deprive you of God-
Given Rights.

The Clayton Act The parties- read carefully sec 17… protects your labor… we are supposed to be in a trade territory aka a state as opposed to the
several states… territory's are federal zones… zip means Zone Improvement Program… hmm read between the lines people
 Our case (void ab initio order to go to Article I
Military Courts) and why they are retaliating
against us NOTE: THE PATTERN and how they
use the courts. Compare 2019 vs 2025 – they
use the courts and their pawns and void ab initio
peace orders, tickets and sheriffs to issue lies
 Why does the state track fake
criminals when they cannot touch a
criminal case due to the Westfall Act
Note the same play book is being used in 2018 by the
Veterans Affairs, DOD, DOJ and the State Court with
Fort Meade Supporting them
DON NOT RAPE?
 How can the United States Inc Courts in
MD give us a fake Criminal document in
violation of the Clearfield doctrine and
while we have a lawsuit against them and
their PRIME CONTRACTOR, UNITED
STATES INC?
DOES THE United States Inc Foreign PEDO CORPORATION REALLY STAND for freedom OR for profit ASK ANY General this
question today “IS the USA INC FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC 28 USC 3002 Proves that the USA INC IS FOREIGN “
• 9589071052700920476517
• 9589071052700920476531
9589071052700920476500
958907105270092047
6524
Justice Anna
9505511999265183829339
Col Gibson- 9505511999265183829315
18 USC 111
18 USC 111
 They have my
son write his last
4 so they can
cash out on his
BID BOND?
Hello Sue,
Every military member without an SF61 on file has never been appointment to public office; and,
The Oath of office we take is a forgery and we never took the oath, the SSN NAME NUMBER took the oath
making all the humans war criminals not covered by sovereign authority (IMHO)

The AF 5331 oath below violates the statutory oath via all caps "SO HELP ME GOD"
The "PERSON" taking the OATH is my SSN-NAME & SSN-Number ; I just witnessed the Social Security
Card taking the oath;
See the First Attachment
Kind Regards
Sean Scott Haggerty
602.815.8062
San Tan Valley A
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm

I sent off an SF-180 to get all of any oaths of office and I included a demand for all of any SF61/61b [even
though the 61b was apparently discontinued meaning any appointee would have their
acknowledgment and acceptance on file > implicating that THEY could appoint anyone to any office without
their knowledge [?] . The OPM testifies there is no SF61 on file, which means
I have never held public office and therefore I have never engaged in a Trade and Business [26 Sec
7701(26)] and therefore I have never earned Wages and I have never earned "Income"
#1 OPM SF180 Records Request
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/order/standard-form-180.pdf
If never in the military, put:
"Ready Reserve" in the BRANCH OF SERVICE column on line 5(b),
find your Selective Service Number online, and put that number under the
SERVICE NUMBER column or if no Selective Service Number then SSN

In Section II of the SF180

#1. Other put "every SF61 of mine or a certificate of non-existence
#2. I selected all of them but Geneology

No SF61 > I never held Public Office >

No Public Office > No Trade and Business 26 Sec 7701 >
No trade and business > No Employee Income >
No Employee Income > NO TAX LIABILITY
2 Title 27 Taxable Events
6-4.270 - Criminal Division Responsibility
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270

The Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is responsible for prosecuting persons who have
committed the following tax-related offenses:
liquor tax
narcotics
stamp tax
firearms
wagering
coin-operated gambling and amusement machines
malfeasance offenses that IRS personnel have committed
forcible rescue of seized property
corrupt or forcible interference with an officer or employee acting under the internal revenue laws (but
not omnibus clause)
counterfeiting, mutilation, removal, or misuse of stamps
See 28 C.F.R. §§ 0.55, 0.70
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270
#3 Clayton Act forms authorizing withholding
Additional information about the Treasury Department’s FOIA program is available at
www.treasury.gov/FOIA
Commentary: You can challenge the assessment's authenticity and the authenticity of the basis of the assessment - all those 1099, 1040, or W-2
forms by which people fraudulently claimed (without signing under penalty of perjury as 26 USC 6065
requires) you earned taxable income.

Since the employer has not a Withholding Agent Certificate- it's a crime. The IRS literature identifies “withholding agents”. Private employers
are not defined as withholding agents
except in connection with foreign activities, etc. The authority of a Withholding Agent (defined in § 7701(a) 16, 26CFR §301.7701-16) to
withhold from one’s pay or remuneration IRC §§1441,1442,1443, and
specifically in 26 CFR §1.1411-7) applies to nonresident aliens. It does not apply to YOU. A Withholding Agent is required to have the specific
Form 2678 on file with the IRS to be legally authorized to withhold
from my earnings for the IRS. Or Form 8655 Reporting Agent Authorizing Certificate from the Treasury Financial Management Service…has
executed one of these forms, 2678 or 8655 specific to YOU, as this is the only authority to withhold by a Withholding Agent as found in the Law.
For they, theses forms, do not apply to you since you are neither a nonresident alien nor a foreign fictitious Entity…. Or are you?

Government is not partly public or partly private, depending upon the governmental pedigree of the type of a particular activity or the manner
[332 U.S. 380 , 384] in which the Government conducts it. The Government may carry on its operations through conventional executive
agencies or through corporate forms especially created for defined ends. See Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 306 U.S. 381, 390,
518.

All federal tax forms are only applicable to the following circumstances:
• Direct financial involvement with the United States government.
• Payments made/received from certain federally regulated financial markets.
• Foreign business activities in the United States.
• Conducting domestic business in certain federally regulated businesses (Subtitle D & E matters).
The IRS does not have lawful authority or jurisdiction to enforce the W4 “program” and the employer is not bound by law to submit any W4's to
the IRS. The United States Government Accounting Office report dated 9/15/03 stated in part, "Under current law, the IRS does not have
statutory authority to impose a penalty to enforce employer compliance with the reporting requirement. The reporting requirement was
promulgated in Treasury regulations." And we all know Treasury Regulations are not law!
The IRS created the income tax liability in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 26 CFR 1.1-1. Congress did not enact any liability statutes for
income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the IRC. Our fundamental Right to Separation of Powers means that only Congress can make law:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1

Check out UNITED STATES v. Lynda Wall and you will also find that those "Notices of Levy” are also legally considered "Counterfeit Securities"
The IRS would like you to believe that "INTERNAL Revenue Service" means Internal to these 50united States of America. TRUTH: Treasury
Delegation Order 150-10 published at 51 Fed. Reg. 9571 specifically states: "The Commissioner shall *to the extent of authority invested in him*,
provide for the administration of "the United States" (corporation) * internal *revenue laws *in theU.S. territories *and insular *possessions
*and other authorized areas of the *world." *NO MENTION of authority within these united States of America! And no definition of "other
authorized areas of the *world". *Does that encompass China, Saudi Arabia, Russia? We are left to "imagine" what it means, but the law is not
about what we "imagine"; the law is about what the law specifically and clearly spells out. One of the few places where income tax law is
specifically and clearly spelled out is Treasury Delegation Order 1150-42 published as 21 Fed. Reg. 5852: "The Commissioner shall, *to the extent
of authority invested in him, *provide for the administration of the United States (corporation) Internal revenue laws in the *Panama Canal
Zone, Puerto Rico, *and the *Virgin Islands." THAT *is the *extent *of their *Internal *Authority! Even the IRS' own definition of "Revenue
Agents" as spelled out by 27 CFR 250.11, is "Agents of the Dept. of Revenue *of Puerto Rico" They are NOT agents of Internal Revenue within the
fifty States united, except when and where they are dealing with Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and such government regulatable activities as that.*
You cannot be REQUIRED to surrender God-Given Unalienable Rights. Technically, you cannot even "volunteer" to give up Unalienable Rights.
The writers of the u.S. Constitution specifically used the word Unalienable to MANDATE that government not impair or deprive you of God-
Given Rights.

The Clayton Act The parties- read carefully sec 17… protects your labor… we are supposed to be in a trade territory aka a state as opposed to the
several states… territory's are federal zones… zip means Zone Improvement Program… hmm read between the lines people
 Our case (void ab initio order to go to Article I
Military Courts) and why they are retaliating
against us NOTE: THE PATTERN and how they
use the courts. Compare 2019 vs 2025 – they
use the courts and their pawns and void ab initio
peace orders, tickets and sheriffs to issue lies
 Why does the state track fake
criminals when they cannot touch a
criminal case due to the Westfall Act
Note the same play book is being used in 2018 by the
Veterans Affairs, DOD, DOJ and the State Court with
Fort Meade Supporting them
DON NOT RAPE?
 How can the United States Inc Courts in
MD give us a fake Criminal document in
violation of the Clearfield doctrine and
while we have a lawsuit against them and
their PRIME CONTRACTOR, UNITED
STATES INC?
How can Voncelle Lie and say I have
weapons in my car, I was not there issuing
her the summons? Oh and by the way the
State of Md INC’s policy states that you can
not retaliate against a process server and or
an ADA Advocate – We call BS!
ON 9 June GS14 pawn Voncelle
James wants to process criminal
charges against using a third
party’s video?????
She wants to make us criminals and wants
us to pay $1,000 and go to jail for 90 days to
dismiss our higher court case against the
United States of American INC THE
CORPORATION (28 USC 3002)
The United States Inc’s Attorneys Office
and the Judges got paid under the table
to violate their oath they don’t have?
They cannot touch a criminal case due
to the Clearfield doctrine
ALL 18 USC 1506
VIOLATIONS
19 May 2025 Void Ab Initio Ticket with fake Kangaroo Court
owned by DOD TBD date – Pay attention to the patterns on 25
Jun 2025- I call bullshit! They get my son and husband to write
the last 4 of the SSN so they can cash out on their BID BOND?
(See Shaunel and the other docket as the Military Courts are
BANKS and the Court of the Clerks are Registers)
18 USC 111
 25 June void
ab initio tickets
to attend
Kangaroo
Courts owned
by DOD
Roberts fake order to attend
Military Article I FOR PROFIT
COURT
w
 Sue’s fake void ab initio tickets to attend a Military
Tribunal owned by DOD – Note: I did not sign it
because its fake and I know their BID-BOND/C-Trust
Game. I inform the Civilian cop that he is committing a
18 USC 1512 and 18 USC 1506 felony by giving me
this fake order as the courts are rigged and the red,
white and blue banner is your warning they are using
admiralty law. I also tell him a felony to go into
Kangaroo Court when you can settle peacefully in
mediation (See Lien)
18 USC 111
Assault in the 2nd Degree
18 USC 115(B)
18 USC 13.82
 They have my
son write his last
4 so they can
cash out on his
BID BOND?
Hello Sue,
Every military member without an SF61 on file has never been appointment to public office; and,
The Oath of office we take is a forgery and we never took the oath, the SSN NAME NUMBER took the oath
making all the humans war criminals not covered by sovereign authority (IMHO)

The AF 5331 oath below violates the statutory oath via all caps "SO HELP ME GOD"
The "PERSON" taking the OATH is my SSN-NAME & SSN-Number ; I just witnessed the Social Security
Card taking the oath;
See the First Attachment
Kind Regards
Sean Scott Haggerty
602.815.8062
San Tan Valley A
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm

I sent off an SF-180 to get all of any oaths of office and I included a demand for all of any SF61/61b [even
though the 61b was apparently discontinued meaning any appointee would have their
acknowledgment and acceptance on file > implicating that THEY could appoint anyone to any office without
their knowledge [?] . The OPM testifies there is no SF61 on file, which means
I have never held public office and therefore I have never engaged in a Trade and Business [26 Sec
7701(26)] and therefore I have never earned Wages and I have never earned "Income"
#1 OPM SF180 Records Request
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/order/standard-form-180.pdf
If never in the military, put:
"Ready Reserve" in the BRANCH OF SERVICE column on line 5(b),
find your Selective Service Number online, and put that number under the
SERVICE NUMBER column or if no Selective Service Number then SSN

In Section II of the SF180

#1. Other put "every SF61 of mine or a certificate of non-existence
#2. I selected all of them but Geneology

No SF61 > I never held Public Office >

No Public Office > No Trade and Business 26 Sec 7701 >
No trade and business > No Employee Income >
No Employee Income > NO TAX LIABILITY
2 Title 27 Taxable Events
6-4.270 - Criminal Division Responsibility
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270

The Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is responsible for prosecuting persons who have
committed the following tax-related offenses:
liquor tax
narcotics
stamp tax
firearms
wagering
coin-operated gambling and amusement machines
malfeasance offenses that IRS personnel have committed
forcible rescue of seized property
corrupt or forcible interference with an officer or employee acting under the internal revenue laws (but
not omnibus clause)
counterfeiting, mutilation, removal, or misuse of stamps
See 28 C.F.R. §§ 0.55, 0.70
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270
#3 Clayton Act forms authorizing withholding
Additional information about the Treasury Department’s FOIA program is available at
www.treasury.gov/FOIA
Commentary: You can challenge the assessment's authenticity and the authenticity of the basis of the assessment - all those 1099, 1040, or W-2
forms by which people fraudulently claimed (without signing under penalty of perjury as 26 USC 6065
requires) you earned taxable income.

Since the employer has not a Withholding Agent Certificate- it's a crime. The IRS literature identifies “withholding agents”. Private employers
are not defined as withholding agents
except in connection with foreign activities, etc. The authority of a Withholding Agent (defined in § 7701(a) 16, 26CFR §301.7701-16) to
withhold from one’s pay or remuneration IRC §§1441,1442,1443, and
specifically in 26 CFR §1.1411-7) applies to nonresident aliens. It does not apply to YOU. A Withholding Agent is required to have the specific
Form 2678 on file with the IRS to be legally authorized to withhold
from my earnings for the IRS. Or Form 8655 Reporting Agent Authorizing Certificate from the Treasury Financial Management Service…has
executed one of these forms, 2678 or 8655 specific to YOU, as this is the only authority to withhold by a Withholding Agent as found in the Law.
For they, theses forms, do not apply to you since you are neither a nonresident alien nor a foreign fictitious Entity…. Or are you?

Government is not partly public or partly private, depending upon the governmental pedigree of the type of a particular activity or the manner
[332 U.S. 380 , 384] in which the Government conducts it. The Government may carry on its operations through conventional executive
agencies or through corporate forms especially created for defined ends. See Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 306 U.S. 381, 390,
518.

All federal tax forms are only applicable to the following circumstances:
• Direct financial involvement with the United States government.
• Payments made/received from certain federally regulated financial markets.
• Foreign business activities in the United States.
• Conducting domestic business in certain federally regulated businesses (Subtitle D & E matters).
The IRS does not have lawful authority or jurisdiction to enforce the W4 “program” and the employer is not bound by law to submit any W4's to
the IRS. The United States Government Accounting Office report dated 9/15/03 stated in part, "Under current law, the IRS does not have
statutory authority to impose a penalty to enforce employer compliance with the reporting requirement. The reporting requirement was
promulgated in Treasury regulations." And we all know Treasury Regulations are not law!
The IRS created the income tax liability in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 26 CFR 1.1-1. Congress did not enact any liability statutes for
income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the IRC. Our fundamental Right to Separation of Powers means that only Congress can make law:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1

Check out UNITED STATES v. Lynda Wall and you will also find that those "Notices of Levy” are also legally considered "Counterfeit Securities"
The IRS would like you to believe that "INTERNAL Revenue Service" means Internal to these 50united States of America. TRUTH: Treasury
Delegation Order 150-10 published at 51 Fed. Reg. 9571 specifically states: "The Commissioner shall *to the extent of authority invested in him*,
provide for the administration of "the United States" (corporation) * internal *revenue laws *in theU.S. territories *and insular *possessions
*and other authorized areas of the *world." *NO MENTION of authority within these united States of America! And no definition of "other
authorized areas of the *world". *Does that encompass China, Saudi Arabia, Russia? We are left to "imagine" what it means, but the law is not
about what we "imagine"; the law is about what the law specifically and clearly spells out. One of the few places where income tax law is
specifically and clearly spelled out is Treasury Delegation Order 1150-42 published as 21 Fed. Reg. 5852: "The Commissioner shall, *to the extent
of authority invested in him, *provide for the administration of the United States (corporation) Internal revenue laws in the *Panama Canal
Zone, Puerto Rico, *and the *Virgin Islands." THAT *is the *extent *of their *Internal *Authority! Even the IRS' own definition of "Revenue
Agents" as spelled out by 27 CFR 250.11, is "Agents of the Dept. of Revenue *of Puerto Rico" They are NOT agents of Internal Revenue within the
fifty States united, except when and where they are dealing with Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and such government regulatable activities as that.*
You cannot be REQUIRED to surrender God-Given Unalienable Rights. Technically, you cannot even "volunteer" to give up Unalienable Rights.
The writers of the u.S. Constitution specifically used the word Unalienable to MANDATE that government not impair or deprive you of God-
Given Rights.

The Clayton Act The parties- read carefully sec 17… protects your labor… we are supposed to be in a trade territory aka a state as opposed to the
several states… territory's are federal zones… zip means Zone Improvement Program… hmm read between the lines people
 Our case (void ab initio order to go to Article I
Military Courts) and why they are retaliating
against us NOTE: THE PATTERN and how they
use the courts. Compare 2019 vs 2025 – they
use the courts and their pawns and void ab initio
peace orders, tickets and sheriffs to issue lies
 Why does the state track fake
criminals when they cannot touch a
criminal case due to the Westfall Act
Note the same play book is being used in 2018 by the
Veterans Affairs, DOD, DOJ and the State Court with
Fort Meade Supporting them
DON NOT RAPE?
 How can the United States Inc Courts in
MD give us a fake Criminal document in
violation of the Clearfield doctrine and
while we have a lawsuit against them and
their PRIME CONTRACTOR, UNITED
STATES INC?
How can Voncelle Lie and say I have
weapons in my car, I was not there issuing
her the summons? Oh and by the way the
State of Md INC’s policy states that you can
not retaliate against a process server and or
an ADA Advocate – We call BS!
ON 9 June GS14 pawn Voncelle
James wants to process criminal
charges against using a third
party’s video?????
She wants to make us criminals and wants
us to pay $1,000 and go to jail for 90 days to
dismiss our higher court case against the
United States of American INC THE
CORPORATION (28 USC 3002)
The United States Inc’s Attorneys Office
and the Judges got paid under the table
to violate their oath they don’t have?
They cannot touch a criminal case due
to the Clearfield doctrine
ALL 18 USC 1506
VIOLATIONS
• 9589071052700920476517
• 9589071052700920476531
9589071052700920476500
958907105270092047
6524
Justice Anna
9505511999265183829339
Col Gibson- 9505511999265183829315
19 May 2025 Void Ab Initio Ticket with fake Kangaroo Court
owned by DOD TBD date – Pay attention to the patterns on 25
Jun 2025- I call bullshit! They get my son and husband to write
the last 4 of the SSN so they can cash out on their BID BOND?
(See Shaunel and the other docket as the Military Courts are
BANKS and the Court of the Clerks are Registers)
18 USC 111
25 June void ab initio tickets to attend
Kangaroo Courts owned by DOD
Roberts fake order to attend
Military Article I FOR PROFIT
COURT
w
Sue’s fake void ab initio tickets to attend a Military
Tribunal owned by DOD – Note: I did not sign it because
its fake and I know their BID-BOND/C-Trust Game. I
inform the Civilian cop that he is committing a 18 USC
1512 and 18 USC 1506 felony by giving me this fake
order as the courts are rigged and the red, white and
blue banner is your warning they are using admiralty
law. I also tell him a felony to go into Kangaroo Court
when you can settle peacefully in mediation (See Lien)
18 USC 111
Assault in the 2nd Degree
18 USC 115(B)
18 USC 13.82
 They have my
son write his last
4 so they can
cash out on his
BID BOND?
Hello Sue,
Every military member without an SF61 on file has never been appointment to public office; and,
The Oath of office we take is a forgery and we never took the oath, the SSN NAME NUMBER took the oath
making all the humans war criminals not covered by sovereign authority (IMHO)

The AF 5331 oath below violates the statutory oath via all caps "SO HELP ME GOD"
The "PERSON" taking the OATH is my SSN-NAME & SSN-Number ; I just witnessed the Social Security
Card taking the oath;
See the First Attachment
Kind Regards
Sean Scott Haggerty
602.815.8062
San Tan Valley A
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm

I sent off an SF-180 to get all of any oaths of office and I included a demand for all of any SF61/61b [even
though the 61b was apparently discontinued meaning any appointee would have their
acknowledgment and acceptance on file > implicating that THEY could appoint anyone to any office without
their knowledge [?] . The OPM testifies there is no SF61 on file, which means
I have never held public office and therefore I have never engaged in a Trade and Business [26 Sec
7701(26)] and therefore I have never earned Wages and I have never earned "Income"
#1 OPM SF180 Records Request
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/order/standard-form-180.pdf
If never in the military, put:
"Ready Reserve" in the BRANCH OF SERVICE column on line 5(b),
find your Selective Service Number online, and put that number under the
SERVICE NUMBER column or if no Selective Service Number then SSN

In Section II of the SF180

#1. Other put "every SF61 of mine or a certificate of non-existence
#2. I selected all of them but Geneology

No SF61 > I never held Public Office >

No Public Office > No Trade and Business 26 Sec 7701 >
No trade and business > No Employee Income >
No Employee Income > NO TAX LIABILITY
2 Title 27 Taxable Events
6-4.270 - Criminal Division Responsibility
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270

The Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is responsible for prosecuting persons who have
committed the following tax-related offenses:
liquor tax
narcotics
stamp tax
firearms
wagering
coin-operated gambling and amusement machines
malfeasance offenses that IRS personnel have committed
forcible rescue of seized property
corrupt or forcible interference with an officer or employee acting under the internal revenue laws (but
not omnibus clause)
counterfeiting, mutilation, removal, or misuse of stamps
See 28 C.F.R. §§ 0.55, 0.70
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270
#3 Clayton Act forms authorizing withholding
Additional information about the Treasury Department’s FOIA program is available at
www.treasury.gov/FOIA
Commentary: You can challenge the assessment's authenticity and the authenticity of the basis of the assessment - all those 1099, 1040, or W-2
forms by which people fraudulently claimed (without signing under penalty of perjury as 26 USC 6065
requires) you earned taxable income.

Since the employer has not a Withholding Agent Certificate- it's a crime. The IRS literature identifies “withholding agents”. Private employers
are not defined as withholding agents
except in connection with foreign activities, etc. The authority of a Withholding Agent (defined in § 7701(a) 16, 26CFR §301.7701-16) to
withhold from one’s pay or remuneration IRC §§1441,1442,1443, and
specifically in 26 CFR §1.1411-7) applies to nonresident aliens. It does not apply to YOU. A Withholding Agent is required to have the specific
Form 2678 on file with the IRS to be legally authorized to withhold
from my earnings for the IRS. Or Form 8655 Reporting Agent Authorizing Certificate from the Treasury Financial Management Service…has
executed one of these forms, 2678 or 8655 specific to YOU, as this is the only authority to withhold by a Withholding Agent as found in the Law.
For they, theses forms, do not apply to you since you are neither a nonresident alien nor a foreign fictitious Entity…. Or are you?

Government is not partly public or partly private, depending upon the governmental pedigree of the type of a particular activity or the manner
[332 U.S. 380 , 384] in which the Government conducts it. The Government may carry on its operations through conventional executive
agencies or through corporate forms especially created for defined ends. See Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 306 U.S. 381, 390,
518.

All federal tax forms are only applicable to the following circumstances:
• Direct financial involvement with the United States government.
• Payments made/received from certain federally regulated financial markets.
• Foreign business activities in the United States.
• Conducting domestic business in certain federally regulated businesses (Subtitle D & E matters).
The IRS does not have lawful authority or jurisdiction to enforce the W4 “program” and the employer is not bound by law to submit any W4's to
the IRS. The United States Government Accounting Office report dated 9/15/03 stated in part, "Under current law, the IRS does not have
statutory authority to impose a penalty to enforce employer compliance with the reporting requirement. The reporting requirement was
promulgated in Treasury regulations." And we all know Treasury Regulations are not law!
The IRS created the income tax liability in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 26 CFR 1.1-1. Congress did not enact any liability statutes for
income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the IRC. Our fundamental Right to Separation of Powers means that only Congress can make law:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1

Check out UNITED STATES v. Lynda Wall and you will also find that those "Notices of Levy” are also legally considered "Counterfeit Securities"
The IRS would like you to believe that "INTERNAL Revenue Service" means Internal to these 50united States of America. TRUTH: Treasury
Delegation Order 150-10 published at 51 Fed. Reg. 9571 specifically states: "The Commissioner shall *to the extent of authority invested in him*,
provide for the administration of "the United States" (corporation) * internal *revenue laws *in theU.S. territories *and insular *possessions
*and other authorized areas of the *world." *NO MENTION of authority within these united States of America! And no definition of "other
authorized areas of the *world". *Does that encompass China, Saudi Arabia, Russia? We are left to "imagine" what it means, but the law is not
about what we "imagine"; the law is about what the law specifically and clearly spells out. One of the few places where income tax law is
specifically and clearly spelled out is Treasury Delegation Order 1150-42 published as 21 Fed. Reg. 5852: "The Commissioner shall, *to the extent
of authority invested in him, *provide for the administration of the United States (corporation) Internal revenue laws in the *Panama Canal
Zone, Puerto Rico, *and the *Virgin Islands." THAT *is the *extent *of their *Internal *Authority! Even the IRS' own definition of "Revenue
Agents" as spelled out by 27 CFR 250.11, is "Agents of the Dept. of Revenue *of Puerto Rico" They are NOT agents of Internal Revenue within the
fifty States united, except when and where they are dealing with Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and such government regulatable activities as that.*
You cannot be REQUIRED to surrender God-Given Unalienable Rights. Technically, you cannot even "volunteer" to give up Unalienable Rights.
The writers of the u.S. Constitution specifically used the word Unalienable to MANDATE that government not impair or deprive you of God-
Given Rights.

The Clayton Act The parties- read carefully sec 17… protects your labor… we are supposed to be in a trade territory aka a state as opposed to the
several states… territory's are federal zones… zip means Zone Improvement Program… hmm read between the lines people
 What is your intent United States Inc NAZI Generals for breaking into my house
w/out a warrant, killing my dog and beating me up in front of my husband, son and
friends when we have you [and BLACKROCK] on our QUO WARRANTO

I WANT THEM ALL HUNG – WE TAKE NO PRISONERS AS PER TITLE II AND III OF THE POLCIES YOU WILL FOLLOW. LET US
BE THE LAST AMERICAN FAMILY YOU FUCK WITH UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN PEDOS
Purpose
• Use our Real Time RICO case against the United States of America and United State of America
• Ask the Generals why they allowed the United State of America 2nd Government pawns to come to my house without a warrant to murder my dog, beat me
in front of my husband, son and neighbors then arrest me and my son and husband
• Destroy my house
• Steal my weapons
• Have a specialist feel all over my pussy vs a female
• Why I have marks on my face and all over my body because your trained specialist beat me while 12 men and housing looked on!
• Bring in a female after the specialist was done to ask me if I was okay
• Have the CID tell my husband and son NOT to tell me that they murdered my ADA DOG, Frankie until after you released us to motel 6 vs our home.
• Made my son cry
• Caused Legal Abuse Syndrom
• Why they have 5 vehicles convoyed us to our house at 2 am in the morning with our hands tied behind our back to only gather a few items (enough to pay for
the motel 6 hotel)
• Why they did not allow us to take our van
• Why they took our house keys away from us and told us if we wanted them back to coordinate with housing to move off post
• Why they ignored the fact that the United States INC is a foreign pedo corporation who is illegally operating outside of DC as the 1870 Corporation ACT IS
VOID AB INIITO
• Why they had CORVIAS HOUSING OPEN OUR DOOR FOR THE 2nd Government men/soldiers
• Why they have trained dumb ass specialist writing void ab initio orders to go to Kangaroo Military court owned by DOD
• Why are they still in my nation vs at GITMO HUNG FOR TREASON as BLACKROCK AND DOD RECEVIED OUR QUO WARRANTO (6 JUNE AND 17 JUNE 2025)
START FROM THE LEADERS ON DOWN!
 The evil in Americas by the United State INC Foreign Corporation DID NOT HAPPEN OVER NIGHT. They occurred over
DECADES. THE SYSTEM RELIES ON YOUR IGNORNCE –IT BENEFITS THE SYSTEM TO KEEP UNAWARE BY NOT KNOWING

The United States INC

DOJ and the General Solicitor confirmed that nobody in the United States Inc took an
oath. Your SSN takes your oath for you aka your Strawman…Every military member
without an SF61 on file has never been appointment to public office; and,
The Oath of office we take is a forgery and we never took the oath, the SSN NAME
NUMBER took the oath making all the humans war criminals not covered by sovereign
authority (IMHO)

The AF 5331 oath below violates the statutory oath via all caps "SO HELP ME GOD"
The "PERSON" taking the OATH is my SSN-NAME & SSN-Number ; I just witnessed the
Social Security Card taking the oath;
See the First Attachment
Proof that nobody in the United States took an oath – You have been tricked
Amooricans from America by BLACK ROCK, DOD, DOJ, and the injustice system 28
USC 3002 Section 15A, 15B and 15C proves that the United States Inc is not our
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BUT TRAITORS COMMITTING TREASON IN MILITARY
RUN KANGAROO COURTS. 1871 KKK Organic Act states they threw the MOORS
constitution in a dust bin then attempted to GENOCIDE THE MOORS FROM
AMERICAS (See Devils Punch BOWL) which demonstrates how they killed the
MOORISH SOLDIERS after they were finished with them in the fake civil war
supported by the 1 percent
NO COMMERCIAL UNITED STATES INC FOREIGN PEDO CORPORATION COURT CAN HEAR OUR CASE WE NEED A
COMPETENT COURT WITHOUT THE RED WHITE AND BLUE CORPORTE BANNER AS THE RED, WHITE AND BLUE
BANNER WITH THE YELLOW FRINDGES IS YOUR WARNING THAT THEY ARE PLAY ROMAN LAW AKA BID-BOND
SCAM
Proof we have the right to sue the
prime contractor of the United
States INC and DOD. We cannot
go into a Military Article Kangaroo
Court, we need competent Courts
aka REAL Military Tribunals/ICC
aka GITMO FOR TREASON
 Why does the state track fake
criminals when they cannot touch a
criminal case due to the Westfall Act
 Note the same play book is
being used in 2018 by the
Veterans Affairs, DOD, DOJ
and the State Court with
Fort Meade Supporting them
DON NOT RAPE?
 How can the United States Inc Courts in
MD give us a fake Criminal document in
violation of the Clearfield doctrine and
while we have a lawsuit against them and
their PRIME CONTRACTOR, UNITED
STATES INC?
How can Voncelle Lie and say I have
weapons in my car, I was not there issuing
her the summons? Oh and by the way the
State of Md INC’s policy states that you can
not retaliate against a process server and or
an ADA Advocate – We call BS!
ON 9 June GS14 pawn Voncelle
James wants to process criminal
charges against using a third
party’s video?????
She wants to make us criminals and wants
us to pay $1,000 and go to jail for 90 days to
dismiss our higher court case against the
United States of American INC THE
CORPORATION (28 USC 3002)
The United States Inc’s Attorneys Office
and the Judges got paid under the table
to violate their oath they don’t have?
They cannot touch a criminal case due
to the Clearfield doctrine
ALL 18 USC 1506
VIOLATIONS
19 May 2025 Void Ab Initio Ticket with fake Kangaroo Court
owned by DOD TBD date – Pay attention to the patterns on 25
Jun 2025- I call bullshit! They get my son and husband to write
the last 4 of the SSN so they can cash out on their BID BOND?
(See Shaunel and the other docket as the Military Courts are
BANKS and the Court of the Clerks are Registers)
18 USC 111
25 June void ab initio tickets to attend
Kangaroo Courts owned by DOD
Roberts fake order to attend
Military Article I FOR PROFIT
COURT
w
Sue’s fake void ab initio tickets to attend a Military
Tribunal owned by DOD – Note: I did not sign it because
its fake and I know their BID-BOND/C-Trust Game. I
inform the Civilian cop that he is committing a 18 USC
1512 and 18 USC 1506 felony by giving me this fake
order as the courts are rigged and the red, white and
blue banner is your warning they are using admiralty
law. I also tell him a felony to go into Kangaroo Court
when you can settle peacefully in mediation (See Lien)
18 USC 111
Assault in the 2nd Degree
18 USC 115(B)
18 USC 13.82
 They have my
son write his last
4 so they can
cash out on his
BID BOND?
Hello Sue,
Every military member without an SF61 on file has never been appointment to public office; and,
The Oath of office we take is a forgery and we never took the oath, the SSN NAME NUMBER took the oath
making all the humans war criminals not covered by sovereign authority (IMHO)

The AF 5331 oath below violates the statutory oath via all caps "SO HELP ME GOD"
The "PERSON" taking the OATH is my SSN-NAME & SSN-Number ; I just witnessed the Social Security
Card taking the oath;
See the First Attachment
Kind Regards
Sean Scott Haggerty
602.815.8062
San Tan Valley A
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm

I sent off an SF-180 to get all of any oaths of office and I included a demand for all of any SF61/61b [even
though the 61b was apparently discontinued meaning any appointee would have their
acknowledgment and acceptance on file > implicating that THEY could appoint anyone to any office without
their knowledge [?] . The OPM testifies there is no SF61 on file, which means
I have never held public office and therefore I have never engaged in a Trade and Business [26 Sec
7701(26)] and therefore I have never earned Wages and I have never earned "Income"
#1 OPM SF180 Records Request
http://supremelaw.org/letters/Public.Notice.htm
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/order/standard-form-180.pdf
If never in the military, put:
"Ready Reserve" in the BRANCH OF SERVICE column on line 5(b),
find your Selective Service Number online, and put that number under the
SERVICE NUMBER column or if no Selective Service Number then SSN

In Section II of the SF180

#1. Other put "every SF61 of mine or a certificate of non-existence
#2. I selected all of them but Geneology

No SF61 > I never held Public Office >

No Public Office > No Trade and Business 26 Sec 7701 >
No trade and business > No Employee Income >
No Employee Income > NO TAX LIABILITY
2 Title 27 Taxable Events
6-4.270 - Criminal Division Responsibility
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270

The Criminal Division of the Department of Justice is responsible for prosecuting persons who have
committed the following tax-related offenses:
liquor tax
narcotics
stamp tax
firearms
wagering
coin-operated gambling and amusement machines
malfeasance offenses that IRS personnel have committed
forcible rescue of seized property
corrupt or forcible interference with an officer or employee acting under the internal revenue laws (but
not omnibus clause)
counterfeiting, mutilation, removal, or misuse of stamps
See 28 C.F.R. §§ 0.55, 0.70
https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-6-4000-criminal-tax-case-procedures#6-4.270
#3 Clayton Act forms authorizing withholding
Additional information about the Treasury Department’s FOIA program is available at
www.treasury.gov/FOIA
Commentary: You can challenge the assessment's authenticity and the authenticity of the basis of the assessment - all those 1099, 1040, or W-2
forms by which people fraudulently claimed (without signing under penalty of perjury as 26 USC 6065
requires) you earned taxable income.

Since the employer has not a Withholding Agent Certificate- it's a crime. The IRS literature identifies “withholding agents”. Private employers
are not defined as withholding agents
except in connection with foreign activities, etc. The authority of a Withholding Agent (defined in § 7701(a) 16, 26CFR §301.7701-16) to
withhold from one’s pay or remuneration IRC §§1441,1442,1443, and
specifically in 26 CFR §1.1411-7) applies to nonresident aliens. It does not apply to YOU. A Withholding Agent is required to have the specific
Form 2678 on file with the IRS to be legally authorized to withhold
from my earnings for the IRS. Or Form 8655 Reporting Agent Authorizing Certificate from the Treasury Financial Management Service…has
executed one of these forms, 2678 or 8655 specific to YOU, as this is the only authority to withhold by a Withholding Agent as found in the Law.
For they, theses forms, do not apply to you since you are neither a nonresident alien nor a foreign fictitious Entity…. Or are you?

Government is not partly public or partly private, depending upon the governmental pedigree of the type of a particular activity or the manner
[332 U.S. 380 , 384] in which the Government conducts it. The Government may carry on its operations through conventional executive
agencies or through corporate forms especially created for defined ends. See Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 306 U.S. 381, 390,
518.

All federal tax forms are only applicable to the following circumstances:
• Direct financial involvement with the United States government.
• Payments made/received from certain federally regulated financial markets.
• Foreign business activities in the United States.
• Conducting domestic business in certain federally regulated businesses (Subtitle D & E matters).
The IRS does not have lawful authority or jurisdiction to enforce the W4 “program” and the employer is not bound by law to submit any W4's to
the IRS. The United States Government Accounting Office report dated 9/15/03 stated in part, "Under current law, the IRS does not have
statutory authority to impose a penalty to enforce employer compliance with the reporting requirement. The reporting requirement was
promulgated in Treasury regulations." And we all know Treasury Regulations are not law!
The IRS created the income tax liability in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 26 CFR 1.1-1. Congress did not enact any liability statutes for
income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the IRC. Our fundamental Right to Separation of Powers means that only Congress can make law:
http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#1

Check out UNITED STATES v. Lynda Wall and you will also find that those "Notices of Levy” are also legally considered "Counterfeit Securities"
The IRS would like you to believe that "INTERNAL Revenue Service" means Internal to these 50united States of America. TRUTH: Treasury
Delegation Order 150-10 published at 51 Fed. Reg. 9571 specifically states: "The Commissioner shall *to the extent of authority invested in him*,
provide for the administration of "the United States" (corporation) * internal *revenue laws *in theU.S. territories *and insular *possessions
*and other authorized areas of the *world." *NO MENTION of authority within these united States of America! And no definition of "other
authorized areas of the *world". *Does that encompass China, Saudi Arabia, Russia? We are left to "imagine" what it means, but the law is not
about what we "imagine"; the law is about what the law specifically and clearly spells out. One of the few places where income tax law is
specifically and clearly spelled out is Treasury Delegation Order 1150-42 published as 21 Fed. Reg. 5852: "The Commissioner shall, *to the extent
of authority invested in him, *provide for the administration of the United States (corporation) Internal revenue laws in the *Panama Canal
Zone, Puerto Rico, *and the *Virgin Islands." THAT *is the *extent *of their *Internal *Authority! Even the IRS' own definition of "Revenue
Agents" as spelled out by 27 CFR 250.11, is "Agents of the Dept. of Revenue *of Puerto Rico" They are NOT agents of Internal Revenue within the
fifty States united, except when and where they are dealing with Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and such government regulatable activities as that.*
You cannot be REQUIRED to surrender God-Given Unalienable Rights. Technically, you cannot even "volunteer" to give up Unalienable Rights.
The writers of the u.S. Constitution specifically used the word Unalienable to MANDATE that government not impair or deprive you of God-
Given Rights.

The Clayton Act The parties- read carefully sec 17… protects your labor… we are supposed to be in a trade territory aka a state as opposed to the
several states… territory's are federal zones… zip means Zone Improvement Program… hmm read between the lines people
This is what we know: YOUR UKNOWN ENSLAVEMENT, a clear breakdown of how and why this happened, grounded in
history, law, and strategy:
• The Shift Was Systematic—Not Publicized The changes that led to what you're discovering now didn’t happen overnight.
They occurred over decades—slowly, deliberately, and mostly outside of public awareness.

• Key Events: 1860-1871: 1863 Abe Lincoln Bankrupted the First United States Inc aka Unite States of America,
1865 – Lincoln order the USA INC troops to kill the copper colored troop in MS (DEVILS PUNCH BOWL) 1868
Vatican set up shop in Delaware, 1860 General Pratt, Priest and Nunns set up residential Schools teaching the
MOORISH Children how to be slaves or tortured them after they stole the kids from their parents. USA INC
wrote the void ab initio 1870 Corporation ACT, 1870 Military Stood up Kangaroo Court Article I, Courts 1871 –
Military Signed the 300 Committee with the Vatican, Queen and 1 percent to destroy Americas inside out. Then in
1871 - The District of Columbia Organic Act created a municipal corporate government for the District of
Columbia. This was the beginning of a dual system: an organic republic and a corporate "United States." 1913:
The Federal Reserve Act privatized the monetary system. This entrenched debt-based money and centralized
power.
 Pattern aka Same Play Book when you WHISTLEBLOW
• 2018 – Filed an EEOC complaint against the United State Inc Corporation subcontractors (VA) in DC. Went to mediation with the
Attorneys in Building 810 (JUDY VALOIS). Before we went to mediation we had an approval for 21 claims. We agreed on 2.8 million.
Solution: NO TIME TO SETTLE YET, WE NEED MOOR TIME TO RETALIATE – WE ALREADY WON.

• 2019 – Austin and I filed a RICO. ROBERT and other ADA Client intervened
• 6 June 2019 – Went to MD State Kangaroo Courts using fake void ab initio orders
• Found guilty 3 or 4 times by corrupt Judges who were working with DOD, VA, Sheriffs, Fort Meade MPs, State Attorneys Office,
Commissioners and etc. Fake Criminals Charges where dropped because of the Clearfield Doctrine. The United States Inc
Corporation are all illegal due to the void ab initio 1870 Corporation Act! It is a felony to continue to use the courts because based
on the real constitution that the MOOR wrote, you cannot pay taxes! See 1871 KKK Organic Act
• RICO 29 Jan 2019 against the United States of America and United States INC Corporation (28 USC 3002 Section 15A, B, C) Proves
it!
• 2019 – Discovered that the courts are rigged owned by DOD as everyone is a corporation locked in the CCR run by DOD
• 2019 – Judge Amy B. Jackson, DOJ, Fred Haynes, State Courts (Judge Z Williams, Debrah Dwyer, Criminal Judge Rand)
Prosecutors, Veterans Affairs Attorneys, Pawns, Sheriffs, Fort Meade Police) Set us up to do jail time using fake Void ab initio
orders) Criminal Court Dropped after we flew in an ADA Advocate, Christopher King (Chris an Attorney who quit the system
because of the corruption) Note: The United States Inc which is really the VA company of London can never touch a Criminal Case
because of the Clearfield doctrine, but yet the courts still play the BID-BOND- C-Trust Game as the COURTS ARE REALLY BANKS
and the Judges, Prosecutors, Cops, Sheriffs, Court of the Clerks, STATES INC are cashing out on you BID BOND
• 2020- Filed Writ of Mandamus and QUO WARRANTO
• 2020 – Trump Bankrupted the United States of America in FL
• 2021 – Discovered that Black Rock in DE is running the United State of America (Military) and United States. We know the United
States Inc Military Leaders signed the Committee of 300 in 1871 which means we have 2 of everything to include the military. The
2nd Government sent their pawns to my house on 25 Jun 2025 to murder my dog, steal our weapons, illegally arrest my family, steal
our car, and kick us our house and have the nerve to gave a baby civilian cop to give us fake void ab fake orders to go to
KANGAROO COURT on A DATE TO BE DETERMINED! WE CALL BS AS WE KNOW THE COURTS ARE Military Article I Courts owned
by DOD
This is what Fort Meade military and Civilian look like! Why did they kill my dog and put my family in jail – Because we are
whistleblowers trying to warn the Amoorican people about the Deep States aka Untied States Inc foreign PEDOS

The Fort Meade Police

Killed my DOG then had
the nerve to get the CID to
lie about his death
The penalty of treason is death. I want all their asses hung!
Starting with the Garrison Commander and the CHIEF OF
The military police aka United States INC FOREIGN PEDO CORPORATION KILLED MY DOG, BEAT ME INFRONT OF MY
HUSBAND, SON, AND FRIENDS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO KEEP THEIR DIRTY LITTLE SECRET
IT BENEFITS THE SYSTEM THE SYSTEM TO KEEP YOU UNAWARE BY NOT KNOWING

The penalty for treason is still death start with leaders then go
after the specialist as nobody gets immunity
The 200th MP Leaders, Fort Meade Police Chief Alvarez, Corvias Housing, Garrison Commander Gore and their police
pawns all coordinated Frankies Death, fraud, waste and abuse on post aka Treason!
 19 May 2025 Complaint about Fort Meade ref: Fake
Tickets, Fake Kangaroo Courts, BID –BONDs/C-Trust –
Request Investigation and Oath of office I know nobody has
as BLACK ROCK Owns the United State of America
(Military) and the United States
Request the Department of Labor investigate FORT MEADE
POLICE and Garrison Commander for 18 USC 1512
violations/FELONIES and RETALIATION | PDF
https://scontent-ord5-3.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-
6/510249596_9946124682090664_77420032698945567_n.j
pg?_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-
7&_nc_sid=f727a1&_nc_ohc=FZn7VeCM5C0Q7kNvwEUMM
kd&_nc_oc=AdnwWb1-
LppOeokW9XPJBv_v24ozZp1GTKrXZqJu9hMmVgAe3TFMcG
Roq7jdnjdUU6zI1LOv7d-
2F71WLph5uKy1&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-ord5-
3.xx&_nc_gid=HNHREjKq-
68eQVcdadx0zQ&oh=00_AfNQtsAk-
xSp4eaHVe6O1P4GIv8kDS_Odznnt7cvwQoJ8g&oe=686973
20
Vatican left DC aka Rome to DE in 1868
 The United State Inc is training our
son’s and daughter to commit Treason
against us! 28 USC 3002 proves the
USA INC is a foreign pedo corrupt
corporation
Major General Susie S.
Kuilan, Commanding
General, 200th Military
Police
Robert got a ticket on FORT MEADE FOR NOT HAVING
REGISTRATION? YEAH RIGHT COMMANDER – YOU
ARE A DEFENDANT
Police Station -
Garrison Commander
If you have to be
a judge, why
were the last 2
Department of
Labor reps, (1)
Not Judges? and
or could not find
their oath of
offices