2015

Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP)

Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT)

BHADRAK
 Bhadrak
As per the 2011 census, the population of
Bhadrak Municipal Corporation is 1.07 lakh.
The decadal growth rate of the city is @
16.16%The average floating population is
about 10,000. Both horizontal and vertical
growth of the city is observed during the
recent years. The city has grown along the
both sides of the Salandi river. The central
part of the city is high density zone with
major land use under residential and
commercial activities.
Bhadrak is primarily centre of agriculture,
trade and commerce activities with few
industrial units. The Municipality areas do
not have many industrial units excluding
some small scale and HH industries along
NH5 and SH9. There are few rice mills and
pulse mills with in municipal unit along NH5.
After the construction of railway line from
Howrah to Madras, the town developed as
an important transport node for the
surrounding region. The transport gained
momentum with the construction of SH9
and Number of Major District roads. Due to
its location in the core of cyclonic tract in
the Bay of Bengal and causing natural hazards in the costal tract, its growth could not sustain and town
remained static till the turn of the Century.

In the Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP) for Bhadrak, sector-wise projects identified and the estimated
costs are: water supply-8 nos./Rs. 107.16 Cr.; sewerage/Septage- 5 nos./ Rs. 221.95 Cr.; storm water
drainage- 5 nos/ Rs. 277.26 Cr.; urban transport – 8 nos. / Rs. 30.80 Cr.; and parks – 6 nos./ Rs. 1.98 Cr. In
total 32 nos of projects have been identified with a total estimated cost of Rs. 639.11 Crore.
Water Supply
Mission Management Information System

1.Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Water
Supply (AMRUT Guidelines; para 3&6).This will also include existing institutional frame
work for the sector. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. The zone-wise
data shall be used in identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive
at city level service gaps. While assessing service level gap reply following questions not
more than word indicated against each question

Question: What kind of baseline information is available for water supply system of the
city? Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sector. Is zone wise
information available? (75words)
Ans. As per census 2011 the population of the town is 1,07,463. The city is completely
dependent on ground source with 20 nos. of production wells and 86.33 km pipeline. There are
1,064 house connections and 102 nos. of stand posts are available. The water is available for 8
hours for the consumer. All information are available ward wise. Consumer and asset database
is maintained which are updated annually.

Question: Have you collected census 2011 data? Are you aware of baseline survey
data of MoUD? Have you correlated data from these and other sources? (75words)
Ans. The data regarding census 2011 has been collected. We have correlated the data with
other sources before preparing the proposal

Question: What are existing service levels for water supply in the city? What is the coverage of
water supply Connections? What is per capita supply of water? How much is the extent of
metering? How much is non-revenue water? Provide information in table
Table: Status of Water Supply service levels
TABLE 1.1 : Status of Water Supply Service
Sr.
Indicators Present status MOUD Benchmark Reliability Level
No.

1 Coverage of water supply connections 7% 100% B

2 Per capita supply of water 45.25 135 LPCD C

3 Extent of metering of water connections 0% 100% D

4 Extent of non-revenue water 87% 20% D

5 Quality of water supplied 100% 100% C

6 Cost recovery in water supply services 25% 100% B

Efficiency in collection of water supply

7 56% 90% B
related charges
Question: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed by
MoUD? (75 words)
Ans: The quality of water has low reliability though the benchmarks are achieved. HH coverage
is deficit by 93% as compared to the benchmark. The LPCD is very low at 45.25. The draw
down is observed in isolated pockets which will affect the ground source being not sustainable
in long run. In absence of metering the NRW is high at 87%. The low cost recovery is due to low
coverage.

SOURCE OF WATER AND WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.
Question: What is the existing source of water? Is it surface water source or underground water
source? What is the capacity of these sources?
Ans. The existing source is underground water & the Capacity of total nos of sources is 6.09
MLD from 20 production wells

Question: Is there any treatment provided to water from these sources? How much
water is required to be treated daily? What is the treatment capacity installed in the
city?
Ans. As the water is ground water, only disinfection in the form of chlorination through bleaching
powder is being done to the water supply system. There are 4 nos. of Bleaching dosing pumps
are operating in the system.
Question: What per capita water supply in LPCD (liter per capita per day) comes out,
if you divide total water supply by the total population?
Ans: The per capita water supply is 45.25 LPCD after deduction of 15% towards losses from the
total production.

DISTRIBUTIONZONES
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not
limited to) following questions.

Question: City is divided in how many zones for water supply?

Ans. The W/S system of the city is functioning in 4 zones.

Question: Provide details of total no of Households (HH) in each zone, no of HH with and
without water tap connections in the Table
Table: Zone Wise Coverage of Households
TABLE 1.2: Zone wise coverage of household
Households Households
Zone No Total No of Households with direct without direct
water supply Connection water supply connections

1 4498 530 3968

2 6560 206 6354
3 6344 162 6182
4 2719 166 2553
Total 20121 1064 19057
STORAGE OF WATER
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not
limited to) following questions.
Question: What is the total water storage capacity in the city? What is capacity of
elevated and ground water reservoirs?
Ans. The total water storage capacity in the city is 0.33 ML. Capacity of ESR is 0.1
ML& Ground water reservoirs is 0.23 ML.
Question: In case of surface water, does city need to have ground level reservoirs to
store raw treated water?
Ans. No, raw water storage is not required since the source is perennial. However clear water
storage is required.
Question: Is water being supplied to consumers through direct pumping or through
elevated reservoirs?
Ans. Through direct pumping.
Question: Is storage capacity sufficient to meet the cities demand ?
Ans.No.

DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not
limited to) following questions.
Question: What is the total length of water supply distribution pipe line laid in the city?
Ans. 86.33 KM.
Question: What is the total road length in the city? Is the pipe lines are laid in all
streets? Is the objective of universal coverage of water supply pipe line is achieved?
Ans. The total road length in the city is 313.78 KM. Pipelines are not laid in all streets.
The objective of universal coverage of water supply pipe line is not achieved.
Question :What are the kind of pipe materials used in distribution lines?
Ans. The pipe materials used in distribution lines are generally CI & PVC.
Question: Provide zone wise details of street length with and without water
distribution lines in the Table?
TABLE 1.3: Zone wise length of distribution network
Street length with water Street length without water
Zone No Total Street Length (m)
distribution pipe line (m) distribution pipe line (m)
1 50,630 17,573 33,057
2 83,160 24,670 58,490
3 1,30,120 32,817 97,303
4 49,870 11,270 38,600
Total 3,13,780 86,330 2,27,450
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not
limited to) following questions.
Question: Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding,
service provision in table
Table: Functions, roles, and responsibilities Planning and Design

TABLE 1.4a: Functions, roles, and responsibilities Planning and Design

Planning and Design Construction/ Implementation O&M

Project team headed by divisional EE O & M team headed by EE and supported

Planning and design Cell in EIC (PH)
along with supervision field engineers by operations engineers and operators.
office headed by SE(P&D) and
(AEE/AE/JE) and supported by PMMU Outsourced PPP model will also be
supported by technical cell and PDMC
and PDMC explored

Question: How city is planning to execute projects?

Ans: The project will be executed by PHEO through a dedicated project team.
Question: Shall the implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation or any
parastatal body? Please refer para 8.1 of AMRUT guidelines.
Ans: It will be executed by a Public Health Engineering Organisation, which a wing of Housing &
Urban Development Department
2. Bridge the Gap
Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives
undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed
to bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 &
6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from the
outcome of assessment and meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.
Question: List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to
address these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for
sector under different schemes with status and when the existing projects are
scheduled to be completed? Provide information in Table

TABLE 1.4b: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned projects

Sl. Scheme Month of

Name of Project Cost Status
No. Name Completion

NIL
Question: How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in water
supply system? Will completion of above will improve the coverage of network and
collection efficiency? If yes, how much. (100 words)
Ans: The gaps are being addressed in a small incremental way with business as usual

Question: Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services?
What kind of services will be required to fulfill the gap?
Ans: Yes. Additional infrastructures are required to address the demand gap. New WTP, feeder
main, storage and distribution are needed to the bridge the gap and attain the benchmark
levels.

Question: How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects
by changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to
focusing on optimum use of existing assets?
Ans: Gaps have been computed after optimally utilizing the existing assets. Replacements are
proposed only for the sections which are affecting the service levels.

Question: Has city conducted assessment of Non Revenue Water? If yes, what is the
NRW level? Is city planning to reduce NRW?
Ans: City has conducted assessment of Non-Revenue Water through indirect methods
which is approximately 87.00%. Yes the city has plans to reduce NRW by way of
introduction of HH level metering, reducing illegal connections and reducing technical
losses.
Question: Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned
projects, calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for water supply pipe
network, number of household to be provided with tap connections, and required
enhancement in capacity of water source/ treatment plant (MLD). Gaps in water
supply service levels be provided as per Table
TABLE 1.5: Gaps in water supply service levels
2015 2021
Component Ongoing
Present Total Demand Gap
projects

Source (MLD) - Ground Source 6.09 6.09 24 24

Treatment capacity (MLD) 0 24 24

Elevated Storage capacity (ML) 0.1 0.1 5.16 5.06

Distribution network coverage (m) 86330 86330 313780 227450

OBJECTIVES
Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universal
coverage. While developing objectives following question shall be responded so as to
arrive at appropriate objective.
Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.
Question: Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of
assessment?
Ans. : Each of the objective have been evolved from the outcome assessment.
Which can be listed as follows
1. Ensure quality to water
2. Universal household level access with adequate water
3. Reduce NRW thereby increase the coverage & cost recovery

Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?
Ans: Yes each of the objective meets the opportunity to bridge the gaps

3. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost

The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to
address these gaps.. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines;
Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9). This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost
estimate with broad source of funding will be explored for each. While identifying the
possible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and its solutions including
status of completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please provide information
on the above responding to (however not limited to) following questions.
Question: What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the
objectives? (75 words)
Ans: AMRUT for holistic approach to achieve universal coverage in all the 4 zones
Question: How can the activities be converged with other programme like JICA/ ADB
funded projects in the city etc? (100words)
Ans: The activities are converged with small incremental projects undertaken under state plan
Question: What are the options of completing the ongoing activities?(75words)
Ans: The ongoing projects will be completed with state budgetary support
Question: How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learnt
during implementation of these projects? (75 words)
Ans: Availability of land is the major bottleneck which have been specifically
addressed prior to preparation of SLIP for the AMRUT projects. Technically feasible
lands have been identified and the concerned authorities have been moved for
transfer of land
Question: What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs? (100words)
Ans: Increase coverage, introduce metering, reduce unauthorized connection, introduce
automation and the like
Question: Will metering system for billing introduced?
Ans. Yes
Question: Whether reduction in O&M cost by addressing NRW levels be applied? (75
words)
Ans: Yes. Reduction in NRW will lead to lower production levels and hence reductions in direct
operational costs like chemical, electricity, manpower etc.
Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?
Ans: Yes.
THE ATERNATIVE ACTIVITIES TO MEET THESE ACTIVITIES BE DEFINED AS
PER TABLE
TABLE 1.6: Alternative Activities to Meet Objectives
Sr.
Objective Activities Financing Source
No.

1 Quality water supply Rehabilitation of venerable streches

Reliability of source & adequecy of

2 Source & treatment facility
water

3 Universal coverage Network expansion and house connection AMRUT

4 NRW reduction Consumer metering & leak reduction

5 Cost recovery Coverage & NRW reduction

4. Citizen Engagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on
the suggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative will be discussed with
citizens and activities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps.
ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on the available
resources. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please explain following
questions in not more than 200 words detailing out the needs, aspirations and wishes
of the local people.

Question: Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?

Ans. Yes
Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?
Ans. Yes. Ward level consultation
Question: Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?
Ans. Yes
Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?
Ans.
Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?
Ans. Yes
Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?
Ans: The prioritization is based on objective, land/power/water availability, implementation
feasibility and sustainability
5. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling
up based on the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While
prioritizing projects, please reply following questions in not more than 200 words.
Question: What are sources of funds?
Ans. Central and state support on 50:50 basis under AMRUT mission
 Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?
Ans. Yes
Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?
Ans. Yes
Question: Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for
prioritization of activities?
Ans. Yes

6.Conditionalities
Describe in not more than 300 words the Conditionalities of each project in terms of
availability of land, environmental obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial
commitment, approval and permission needed to implement the project.
Ans: Lands is available for the proposed infrastructures. Environmental clearances are not
required proposed project. Power availability has been discussed with NESCO and agreed
upon. The funding shall be tied up with AMRUT scheme

7. Resilience
Required approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience
factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable water supply scheme.
Describe in not more than 300 words regarding resilience built in the proposals.
Ans. The proposal has taken into consideration disaster resilience into consideration

8.FinancialPlan
Total No of Projects identified is 8 nos with an estimated cost of Rs. 107.16 Cr. is required to
achieve universal coverage as envisaged under AMRUT. The completion period of this project
is planned by 2019-20. The water supply system is under parastatal agency i.e. Public Health
Engineering Organization (Urban). The ULB own generated fund is not able to cover the
operational requirements of ULB and has been depending upon the state grant for the same.
Therefore, all infrastructure development projects are required to be funded by Centre/ State
grants or loan funds by state agencies. Accordingly the present investment on the projects is
planned based on 50% fund as grant from Centre and 50% fund to be met by state grant and
some limited funds from ULB/ soft loans from financial agency like OUIDF. At the planning
stage, it is not possible to identify the breakup of funding pattern for state 50 % share of fund
and it is considered that this fund shall be made available from state resources. Based on the
above financial plan the specific responses to the questionnaires given in the template are as
under:
 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating infrastructure
projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULB
do not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.
 List of individual project which is being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50%
state grant. Soft loan from funding agencies will be explored which will form part of ULB
contribution. However, the state share will not be less than 20%.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence and
consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered under
other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned for
projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on
50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultation for
involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.
 Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has been
categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contribute
required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will be met
from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have been categorized
based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUT scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of apart from infrastructure cost, the O&M requirement of
project life cycle. It will be possible to be sustained throughout the life cycle.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,
ULBs and)
Yes, the initial sharing of financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes various ongoing projects under different schemes supported by both Central &
State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 2.1.

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5.
These tables are based on amrut guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

TABLE 2.1: Master Plan of Water Supply Projects for Mission period
Year in which Year in which Estimated
Sr. Priority
Project Name & code to be proposed to be Cost
No. number
implemented completed (Cr. Rs.)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -Rehabilitation P1
1 1 15-16 16-17 6.12
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/01)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z1
6 5 16-17 18-19 11.59
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/05)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z2
7 6 16-17 18-19 20.26
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/06)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z3
8 7 16-17 18-19 27.38
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/07)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z4
9 8 16-17 18-19 10.60
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/08)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P1
12 3 16-17 17-18 2.52
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/03)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P2
13 4 16-17 18-19 23.69
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/04)
 Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P3
14 2 17-18 18-19 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/02)
Grand Total 107.16

TABLE 2.2: Master Service Level Improvement during Mission period

Change in Service Levels Estimated
Sr. Physical
Project Name & code Existing After Cost (Cr.
No. Component Indicator
(As-Is) (To-be) Rs.)
Consumer Metering 0% 5%
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -Rehabilitation
meter & pipe 6.12
P1 (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/01) Quality 100%, C 100%, A
replacement
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z1 Storage &
Coverage 11.8% 100.0% 11.59
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/05) Distribution
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z2 Storage &
Coverage 3.1% 100.0% 20.26
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/06) Distribution
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z3 Storage &
Coverage 2.6% 100.0% 27.38
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/07) Distribution
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z4 Storage &
Coverage 6.1% 100.0% 10.60
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/08) Distribution
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks Source Per capita
45 135 2.52
P1 (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/03) Development water supply
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks Per capita
Treatment 45 135 23.69
P2 (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/04) water supply
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks Source Per capita
45 135 5.00
P3 (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/02) Development water supply

TABLE 2.3.1a:Total Fund Sharing Pattern for water supply projects during mission period

Sr. Total Project Share (Amount in Cr. Rs.)

Name of Project & code
No. Cost (Cr. Rs.)
GOI State ULB Others Total
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -Rehabilitation P1
1
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/01) 6.12 3.06 3.06 6.12
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z1
6
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/05) 11.59 5.80 5.80 11.59
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z2
7
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/06) 20.26 10.13 10.13 20.26
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z3
8
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/07) 27.38 13.69 13.69 27.38
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z4
9
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/08) 10.60 5.30 5.30 10.60
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P1
12
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/03) 2.52 1.26 1.26 2.52
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P2
13
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/04) 23.69 11.84 11.84 23.69
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P3
14
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/02) 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00
Total
107.16 53.58 53.58 - - 107.16
TABLE 2.3.1b: Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for water supply projects

Sr. Total Project Share (Amount in Cr. Rs.)

Name of Project & code
No. Cost (Cr. Rs.)
GOI State ULB Others Total
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -Rehabilitation P1
1 6.12 1.53 1.53 3.06
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/01)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z1
6 11.59 - - -
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/05)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z2
7 20.26 - - -
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/06)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z3
8 27.38 - - -
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/07)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -New Z4
9 10.60 - - -
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/08)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P1
12 2.52 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/03)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P2
13 23.69 2.37 2.37 4.74
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/04)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak - Headworks P3
14 5.00 0.50 0.50 1.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/02)
Total 107.16 4.65 4.65 - - 9.30

TABLE 2.3.2: Annual Fund Sharing break up for water supply

project All Amount in Crores of Rs.
State ULB
Sr. 14t Convergen Tot
Project Name & code GoI 14th Other Tot h Other Tot Other
No. ce al
s al s al s
FC FC
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -
1 Rehabilitation P1
1.53 1.53 1.53 3.06
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/01)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -
6 New Z1
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/05)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -
7 New Z2
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/06)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -
8 New Z3
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/07)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -
9 New Z4
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/08)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -
12 Headworks P1
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/03)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -
13 Headworks P2
2.37 2.37 2.37 4.74
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/04)
Improvement of WS to Bhadrak -
14 Headworks P3
0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/WS/02)
Total -
4.65 - 4.65 4.65 - - - - 9.30
TABLE 2.5: Year wise Plan for Service Level Improvement
Annual Targets
Project (Increment from the Baseline Value)
Proposed Project Cost in Indicator Baseline
Cr. Rs. FY 2016 FY FY FY FY
H1 H2 2017 2018 2019 2020
Improvement fo
water supply to
Bhadrak under 107.16
AMRUT
Coverage of water supply
7.2% 8% 10% 12% 50% 80% 100%
connections
Per capita supply of water 45.25 46 46 46 135 135 135
Extent of metering of water
0% 0% 2% 20% 70% 90% 100%
connections
Extent of non-revenue
87% 85% 83% 70% 50% 30% 20%
water
Quality of water supplied 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cost recovery in water
25% 25% 30% 35% 50% 80% 100%
supply services
Efficiency in collection of
water supply related 56% 56% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
charges
Storm Water Drainage
 Mission Management Information System
I. Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Storm Water Drainage
(AMRUT Guidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existing institutional framework for the
sector. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. The zone wise data shall be used in
identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive at city level service gaps.
While assessing service level gap reply following questions not more than word indicated against
each question.

1.1 . What kind of baseline information is available for storm water drainage system of the
city? Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sector.Is zone wise
information available? (75 words)
The base line information of urban population(ward wise) is available in Census-2011,
rainfall data and climatic data with significance of catchment area is received from metrological
department, information about length of roads& drains (ward wise by CDP), maps (GIS by CDP),
City Development Plan 2015.

Yes, zone wise information for Storm Water Drainage (SWD) is available.

1.2.Have you collected data from census other sources? Are you aware of baseline survey
data of MoUD? Have you correlated data from these and othersources?(75 words)

Yes, the data are collected from population Census 2011, District Statistics Office, slum
population from IHSDP& IIHL.
Yes, the above information relating to baseline survey data of MoUD are ascertained from CDP
for Bhadrak City-2040.
Yes, all the data above are correlated as per availability of different sources.

1.3 What is existing service levels for storm water drainage in the city? What is the
coverage of drains? What are the no of incidence of sewerage mixing in the drains? How
many times water logging incidence happens in the city? Provide comparative
information of service levels (in tabulated form) with respect to the service level bench
marks prescribed by MoUD and sustainable standards for service levels under the
National Mission on Sustainable Habitat (NMSH) in table 1.1

Red
Sustainable Black (Caution for Present
Sr. No. Indicators (Immediate action
standards improvement) Status
for improvement)
Coverage of Storm water
1 100% <75% <50% 10.5%
drainage network
Incidence of sewerage
2 0% <25% <50% 1%
mixing in the drains1
Incidence of water logging 2
3 0 <25 <50 12
(in nos. per year)

Table 1.1 :Status of Storm Water Level service levels

1.4: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed by
MoUD and sustainable standards for service levels under the National Mission on
Sustainable Habitat (NMSH)?(75 words)

1
Incidence of sewerage mixing in the drains are ratio of no of households discharging wastewater directly into the drains to the total
no of households.
2
No of times water logging is reported in a year, at flood prone points in the city
The coverage area of drain is achieved only by 10.5% w.r.t. road length. So there is an gap of
89.5%. Further, There are 36nos. of water logging spots are identified within the city. The water
logging happens approximately 10-12 times a year.

1.5 What are major challenge facing the city in regard to achieving these service level
benchmarks?
The challenges faced by the city to achieve SLB are as follows
1. Lack of proper drainage network
2. Encroachment & obstacles
3. Due to maximum opening of the Hadgadh Dam during rainy seasons because of low
intake capacity and high catchment area.
4. Choking of drains by solid waste
5. Silting of drains
6. Uncovered Drainages

1.6: Identify gaps in capacity in managing the services efficiently and also provide an
innovative solution for efficiently managing these services.
The challenges faced by the city to achieve SLB are as follows
1. Existing drain should be covered
2. Kutcha drains need to be converted to RCC/pukka.
3. Raising & widening of existing culverts and drains.
4. Renovation and retrofitting of old stone masonary drains
5. Encroachment of drains needs to be checked
6. Construction of roads with drains.
1.7: Brief the ongoing drainage projects in the city. The components included in these
projects, how and up to what extent it will support to the drainage system of the city.
Weather it address all the issues related to drainage?
No, there is no existing drainage project.

2.0 Coverage of drains **

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.

2.1:Describe how at present, the storm water of City is drained off? How many natural and
manmade drains are exists and their coverage with respect to road network?
There exist a network of kutch of total length 210 km and pucca 33 km drains finally leading
to natural drain of 25.72 km which finally leads to Mahanadi River.
There are ten drains but there is one major natural drains named Nazor Nala of 10 km with
the discharge point at Icchapur is around total of 13 km. This compared to 313kms of road
network provides an coverage 10.5% on storm water drainage sector with consideration of
only manmade drains.

2.2 What is the capacity and condition of these drains? Is sufficient to carry the peak flow
of the catchment/water shed?
Presently the existing Pucca drains are in depilated condition and are uncovered as it is
approximately 5 years old. These SWD are not repaired and maintained since last two years.
No, the existing SWD network is not sufficient to carry the peak flow of the catchment/water
shed which leads to flooding at 36 places.
2.3 Does city have separate storm water drainage network? If no, provide the information
regarding locations of gray water mixes with the existing drains in table 1.2. In case of
mixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?

There is no separate SWD network prevailing in the city. All households in the city dispose
their gray water to the existing SWD.

S.No. Sewer Zone/ Ward No Location Merging with which sewer

All households/all zone/ward in the town outlet their gray water to the existing drains.

Table 1.2: Detail of Locations where storm water get mixed with sewer

2.4 In case of mixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?

During the peak rainy days the waste water that is storm water and the sewer water floods up
the roads, household and the intersection. This flooding happens 10-12 times in a year and
creating nuisance for minimum of 2-8days.

3.0 Water Logging

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.
3.1 Presently how the problem of water logging is handled? Is it provides the satisfactory
outcome?
At, the present during water logging 15-16 pumps are used to pump out the water in the
water logging area. In majority of time the fire dept. comes for the help of municipality in order
to solve the SWD issue.
3.2 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special
focus on Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality
(affecting 50 HH or more) in the Table 1.2.
The reason for water logging and flooding are generally observed during peak rainy
season in low laying areas of the City with adjacent to the locality of the river bed side.
Especially during flood situations. As a result of which a very few households on the
slum pockets are being affected.

No of times water logging reported in

S.No
Area No of points a year ( stagnant water for more than
.
four hours of a depth more than 6” )
Santhia,Nilakanthapur,Nanghamohalla,Kajisahi,San
Key road intersection
1 karpur,Darjipatti,Patnasahi,Jamirpatti,Mulnasahi,Issa 10
fpur,Helasahi,Chhadak Mohalla,
ChhadakMohalla,Tinapatti,Allalpur,NanghaMohalla,
Along roads ( 50 mt Mirzapur,Katualsahi,Nathasahi,Beherasahi,Dhanatol
2 12
length or, more) a,NayaNagar,Nuasahi, Bhuyanmohalla,
Garadpur,Durgapur,Kntabania
Chhadak Mohalla, Bankasahi, Hazari
Nagar,Kuansh,Chamarsahi,Naripur,Januganj,Bagur
Locality (affecting 50
3 ai,Sahapur,Gabasahi,Mathasahi,Bhadrak College 12
HH or more)
Area,Apartibindha,Mirsahi,Elkha,Baralapokhari,Dag
arasahi,Belamal,Kantapal,Telangapatti

Table 1.2: Flood prone points in the city

4.0 Chocking of drains
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.
4.1 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special
focus on Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality
(affecting 50 HH or more) in the Table 1.2.
Stretch Length Affected
S. No. Sewer Zone/Ward No Location
60 mts
1 Bhadrak college chowk
50 mts
2 Bhadrak high school chowk
50 mts
3 Yousufpur

4 Talasai culvert 55 mts

5 Bridge no-3 53 mts

Table 1.2: Detail of Locations prone to chocking of drains due to solid waste

4.2 How presently the problem is addressed?

This ULB is taking all appropriate measures for Desiltingof drains by municipality sweepers and
engaging outsourced sweepers, engaging JCB and Pumps to pump out the waters.

5.0 Institutional Framework

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.
5.1 Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding, service
provision in table 1.3. Is it in accordance with the AMRUT guidelines (Clause 8.1)?
This ULB is confined with promoting basic amenities to its City’s people in terms of O&M creating
awareness amongst the people and their role of social responsibility through the community
participation. The Planning & Policies are being prepared and monitored by technical experts and
stakeholders.

Planning and Design Construction/ Implementation O&M

ULB ULB ULB

Table 1.3: Functions, roles, and responsibilities

5.2 How city is planning to execute projects?

The council of the ULBs at the beginning of the FY prepares the projects to be undertaken under
this head with availability of state government funds and own resource. With execution of
projects in time bound manner through tendering under the direct supervision of EO and Works
dept.

5.3 Shall the implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation? If no, weather
resolution has been passed by the Municipal Corporation and accordingly, a tripartite
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between State Government, Municipal
Corporation and Parastatal has been signed? Please refer para 8.1 of AMRUT
guidelines.
YES. The projects shall be implemented by the ULB concerned with due weightage to MoUD and
AMRUT mission with the help of technical experts, designers and stakeholders. But presently the
SWD system is being maintained by the ULB in traditional process.

II. Bridge the Gap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives undertaken
in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to
achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 & 6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each
of the identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment and meeting the
opportunity to bridge the gap.

1.1 List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to address
these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for sector
under different schemes with status and when the existing projects are scheduled to
be completed? Provide information in Table
Status
S. Month of
Name of Project Scheme Name Cost (as on ddmm
No. Completion
2015)
Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Table 1.4: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

1.2 How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in storm water
drainage system? Will completion of above improve the coverage of network;
eliminate the chocking of drains and water stagnation problem? If yes, how much. (100
words)
The existing system is able to cover only 10.5% of the road length and as there is no further
project in the SWD sector so there is no further gap being bridged.

1.3 Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What kind of
services will be required to fulfill the gap?
Yes, the city would require additional asset creation and renovation of the existing one to
achieve the 100 % universal coverage necessary to improve the SWD system.
The city needs 100% SWD coverage with covered drains and which would need proper
maintenance of the existing infrastructure and new system.

1.4 How does the city visualizes to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects by
changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to
focusing on optimum use of existing assets?
The existing network of kuccha and dilapidated pucca drains could be retrofitted and
rejuvenated to bring down the cost of the total new asset creation.

1.5 Has city conducted assessment of O&M cost of drains and potable pumps? if yes,
what is it? Is city planning to reduce it?
There is no assessment done in maintenance of the drains and the pumps. However there
are maintenance as in when required.

1.6 Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects,

calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for Rejuvenation of existing
drains, construction of new primary and secondary drains, construction of pump
house with pumping machinery, covering of drains. Gaps in Storm water drainage
service levels are provided as per Table 1.5.
1.7 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special
focus on Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality
(affecting 50 HH or more) in the Table 1.5.
2015 2021
Component Ongoing
Present Total Demand Gap
projects
Major Drains (new construction) nil 25.7 25.7
Network requirement to provide proper
drainage to all identified water stagnant
33.0 nil 33.0 313.78 280.78
point/ flooding points up to the end
discharge point (in Km)
Network length where households
discharging wastewater directly into the 33 nil 33
drains
Rejuvenation of existing primary drains and
primary drains including covering and 0 0 9.9 9.9
installation of filter

1.8 Whether these gaps presented in measurable/ executionable ways considering all the
ongoing projects? (75 words)
As there are no existing projects available.

2.0 Objectives

Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage.
While developing objectives following question shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate
objective.
2.1 Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment?
Yes, the objective has been evolved from the SLB assessment which tries to fill the gap
in order to achieve the 100% universal coverage.
2.2 Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?
Yes, all the objectives has been derived keeping in mind the existing opportunities which
would probably try to bridge the existing gap in order to achieve the 100% universal
coverage.
2.3 Does objectives clearly address all these gaps /solution to all the problems related
to storm water drainage of the city?
Yes, each of the objective has been formulated in order to bridge the existing gap and
find solution to all the problems related to storm water drainage of the city.

Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 150 words.

III. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost

The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to address
these gaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.4 & 6.8 &
6.9).This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost estimate with broad source of
funding will be explored for each. While identifying the possible activities, also examine the
ongoing scheme and its solutions including status of completion, coverage and improvement in
O&M. Please provide information on the above responding to (however not limited to) following
questions.
 1.1 Does all these gaps clearly identified and addressed? (75 words)
Yes, The detail estimate with source of funding have been identified in respect of Bhadrak
City with respect to SWD which can some extent improvise the present scenario with an
expectation of greater utility.

1.2 What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the
objectives? (75 words)
The construction kuccha drains, retrofitting, renovation of the necessary pucca drains and lining
of the left out natural drains could be constructed under the state and ULB funding. (Annual
cleaning of Drainage is also from state / ULB fund)
The possible activities are as follows:
1) Construction of RCC kuccha drains with cover slabs
2) Covering of existing puccaa drains
3) Desilting/ retrofitting, renovation of exsting puccaa drains
4) Lining of the left out natural drains
5) Frequent Cleaning of SWD channel.
The major funding of the above sector has been three folded that is central, state and ULB.
1.3 How can the activities be converged with other programme like JICA/ ADB
funded/SBM/Smart city mission projects in the city etc.? (i.e. convergence with
other schemes)(100 words)
The convergence of the activity can’t be done for the city as the city is not covered in any of the
major mission like JICA/ ADB funded/Smart city. However, the SBM is taken up by the
municipality. So we could propose the action necessary to avoid choking of the drainage through
the SBM. Which indirectly helps in improving the SWD of the city.
1.4 What are the options (financial alternatives) of completing the ongoing activities
specially on going JnNURM projects? (75 words)
As Bhadrak city is not covered under the JNNURM/UDISSMT etc. So there are no other mission
which would cater as a financial alternative. Further there is no major ongoing activity on the
sector for the city.
1.5 What are the lessons learnt during implementation of similar projects? (100 words)
There has been an issue related to execution of the similar project. There exists local and site
specific issues. Further there are also encroachment & eviction of the property adjacent to the
SWD.
Also there are various service lines like cable line/ service lines/ phone line laid with the SWD
which creates an unnecessary delay in O&M and also renovation of the SWD. Also, there has
been shortage of staff, lack of skilled personnel, training. The ULB also need proper capacity
building for the staffs and the service providers who can improvise the day to day activities.
1.6 Have you analyzed best practices and innovative solutions in sector? Is any of the
practice be replicated in the city?(75 words)
Certain of cities of Kerala and cuttack is seen to be the best practice and many of the issues
related to the flooding and storm water network could be resolved by looking at those city.
However there are no similarity in geographical features of the Cuttack and Bhadrak.
1.7 What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs?(100 words)
Presently there is only holding tax being imposed in the City so by imposing property tax the
sector could achieve the required financial from the government would help at least for the
maintenance.
 1.8 Whether reduction in O&M cost by energy efficient pumps etc be applied?(75
words)
Yes, as the ULB uses pumps in the city to take off the flooding water so it is necessary to
considered energy efficient pumps.
1.9 Are different options of PPP such as Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT), Design
Built Finance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) are considered?(100 words)
There are no PPP mode used in any of the plan or project in Bhadrak city.

Sr. Financing
Objective Activities
No. Source

11 To Have Complete network Coverage and Augmentation Of The SWD Network

11 covering of The Storm Water Network
Creation of the new network

Covering of the SWD

Improving the SWM under Swatch
2 To reduce the flooding points Bharat Abhiyan State / Central/ ULB
Creating the energy efficient pumping
facility
Creating the energy efficient pumping
2 To reduce the backflow of the flooding water
facility
3 Creating the Swliss gate facility

The alternative activities to meet these activities are defined as per Table 1.6

IV. Citizen Engagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on the
suggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and
activities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize these
activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.6,
6.7 & 7.2). Please explain following questions in not more than 200 words detailing out the
needs, aspirations and wishes of the local people.

1.1 Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?

All the major stakeholder has been included in the consultancy workshop. This includes majorly
council members and media persons etc.
1.2 Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?
Yes, but not separately the ward’s prominent person have been called up in the consultations.
1.3 Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?
No the alternative hasn’t been proposed above the crowd source.
1.4 What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?
Yes, only the major and the relevant feedbacks and alternatives/innovations has been taken up.

1.5 Is any new potential alternative is received? If so, how it is addressed?

No there are no potential alternative is received.

1.6 Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?
As no alternatives has been received so it hasn’t been taken up for discussion.
 1.7 What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Our approach has been taken up with the consideration of prioritizing the more problematic area
with less problematic area as the city is flood affected.

V. Prioritize Projects

Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based
on the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please
reply following questions in not more than 200 words.

1.1 What are sources of funds?

The major sources of State fund / ULB fund/ finance commission fund (central)

1.2 Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?

Yes. But partly and indirectly with the SWM, for choking of the drains

1.3Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?

Our approach has been taken up with the consideration of prioritizing the more problematic area
with less problematic area as the city is flood affected.

1.4 Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for
prioritization of activities?
Yes, we have taken up approach to completely solve (Universal coverage that is 100%
coverage) the problem of SWD.

VI. Conditionalties

Describe in not more than 300 words the Conditionalties of each project in terms of
availability of land, environmental obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial
commitment, approval and permission needed to implement the project. ** (Plz : attach
pages)

As the project is for Storm Water Drainage so no major land is required. However, it is necessary
for the pump house. There is requirement of environmental clearance and the NOC for the outfall
points.

The financial commitment, approval and permission is needed to be implement for the project
from the necessary department.

VII. Resilience

Required approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience
factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable storm water drainage
scheme. Describe in not more than 300 words regarding resilience built in the proposals.
** (Plz : attach pages)

The BOD and the COD of the storm should be lowered down to the necessary level such that it
doesn’t affect the nearby environment.

VIII. Financial Plan

Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in
terms of capital cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5)
Based on the investment requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified.
Financial Plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared.
(AMRUT Guidelines; para 4, 6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include
percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State and City) including financial
convergence with various ongoing projects. While preparing finance plan please reply
following questions in not more than 250 words

 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating
infrastructure projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the
ULB do not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.
 List of individual projects which are being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and
50% state grant. Soft loan from funding agencies will be explored which will form part of
ULB contribution. However, the state share will not be less than 20%.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence
and consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered
under other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been
planned for projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded
under AMRUT on 50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required.
However, consultation for involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the
objective of the mission.
 Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has
been categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to
contribute required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these
projects will be met from internal resources including collection of user charges. The
projects have been categorized based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage
as required under AMRUT scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of apart from infrastructure cost, the O&M requirement
of project life cycle. It will be possible to be sustained throughout the life cycle.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre,
State, and ULBs)
Yes, the initial sharing of financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state
grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes various ongoing projects under different schemes supported by both
Central & State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 1.7

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 1.7,1.8,1.9,1.10 and 1.11. These
tables are based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2,2.3.1,2.3.2, and 2.5.
Table 1.7 Master Plan of Storm Water Drainage Projects for Mission period(As per Table
2.1of AMRUT guidelines)
 Master Plan of Storm Water Drainage Projects for Mission period
Year in which Year in which
Estimated
Sr. No Project Name Priority number to be proposed to be
Cost
implemented completed
Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak
1 town in zone 4 1 2015-16 2016-17 72.15
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/04

Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak

2 town in zone 2 2 2016-17 2016-17 27.23
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/02

Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak

3 town in zone 5 3 2017-18 2017-18 54.35
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/05

Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak

4 town in zone 3 4 2018-19 2018-19 35.92
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/03

Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak

5 town in zone 1 5 2019-20 2019-20 87.61
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/01

Grant Total 277.26

Table 1.8 Master Service Levels Improvements during Mission Period

(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines)
Change in Service Levels
Sr. Estimate
Project Name Physical Component Existing After
No Indicator d Cost
As-Is to Be
1. Construction of covered storm water Coverage Drainage
drainage network. 10.31% 100%
Augmentation of Network
2. Renovation of Existing Storm Water
SWD in Bhadrak
Drainage
1 town in zone 4 72.15
3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water
AMRUT/OD/BHAD 4 0
4. Construction of Pumping Station and Logging
RAK/SWD/04
erection of pumping arrangment.
5. Arrengment of Sluice gate
1. Construction of covered storm water Coverage Drainage
11.77% 100%
drainage network. Network
Augmentation of
2. Renovation of Existing Storm Water
SWD in Bhadrak
Drainage
2 town in zone 2 27.23
3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water
AMRUT/OD/BHAD 3 0
4. Construction of Pumping Station and Logging
RAK/SWD/02
erection of pumping arrangment.
5. Arrengment of Sluice gate

1. Construction of covered storm water Coverage Drainage

8.69% 100%
drainage network. Network
Augmentation of
2. Renovation of Existing Storm Water
SWD in Bhadrak
Drainage
3 town in zone 5 54.35
3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water
AMRUT/OD/BHAD 2 0
4. Construction of Pumping Station and Logging
RAK/SWD/05
erection of pumping arrangement.
5. Arrangement of Sluice gate
 1. Construction of covered storm water
drainage network. Coverage Drainage
Augmentation of 13.10% 100%
2. Renovation of Existing Storm Water Network
SWD in Bhadrak
Drainage
4 town in zone 3 35.92
3. Construction of wet well.
AMRUT/OD/BHAD
4. Construction of Pumping Station and Incidence of Water
RAK/SWD/03 2 0
erection of pumping arrangment. Logging
5. Arrengment of Sluice gate
1. Construction of covered storm water Coverage Drainage
10.13% 100%
drainage network. Network
Augmentation of
2. Renovation of Existing Storm Water
SWD in Bhadrak
Drainage
5 town in zone 1 87.61
3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water
AMRUT/OD/BHAD 1 0
4. Construction of Pumping Station and Logging
RAK/SWD/01
erection of pumping arrangment.
5. Arrengment of Sluice gate

Table1.9 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Storm Water Projects

(As per Table 2.3.1of AMRUT guidelines)
Total Share
Sr.No Name of Project Financial Year Project Total
Cost GoI State ULB Others
Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak
1 town in zone 4 2015-16 28.86 14.43 14.43 28.86
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/04
Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak
2 town in zone 4 2016-17 43.29
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/04
Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak
3 town in zone 2 2016-17 27.23
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/02
Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak
4 town in zone 5 2017-18 54.35
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/05
Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak
5 town in zone 3 2018-19 35.92
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/03
Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak
6 town in zone 1 2019-20 87.61
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/01
Total 277.26 14.43 14.43 28.86
 State ULB
Sr.
Project GoI 14th 14th Convergence Others Total
No. Others Total Others Total
FC FC

28.86
Augmentation of SWD in Bhadrak town in
1 14.43 14.43
zone 4 AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/SWD/04

Total

Table 1.11Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements

(As per Table 2.5 of AMRUT guidelines)
Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements
Proposed FY2016 FY 2017
Base Present
Sl. No Project Indicator Gap FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
Line Status H1 H2
Cost in Cr.
Coverage of Storm Water Drainage
1 100% 11% 89% 0% 22.06% 49.95% 71.69% 85.72% 100.00%
277.26 Network
2 Incidence of Water Logging 0 12 12 12 8 5 3 1 0
Sewerage
 Mission Management Information System
1. Assess the Service Level Gap
The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Sewerage (AMRUT
Guidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existing institutional framework for the sector. For this
City has to review all policy, plans, scheme documents etc. to identify service level gaps and hold
discussions with officials and citizens. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. The
zone wise data shall be used in identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive
at
city level service gaps. While assessing service level gap reply following questions not more than
word indicated against each question.

Question: What kind of baseline information is available for sewerage system of the city? Detail out
the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sewerage available with city? Is zone wise
information available? Have you correlated your data with census 2011 data? (100 words)
Ans. Census 2011, Draft CDP, are available and have been correlated with
census 2011 data.

Question: What are existing service levels for sewerage for coverage of sewerage
network services, efficiency of collection of sewerage and efficiency in treatment. Provide
information in table
Table 2.1 : Status of sewerage network and Service l evels

Sr. No Indicators Existing Service level MOUD Benchmark

coverage of latrines
1 62% 100%
( individual or community)

2 Coverage of sewerage network services 0% 100%

3 Efficiency of collection of sewerage 0% 100%

Efficiency in Treatment: Adequacy of

4 0% 100%
sewerage treatment capacity

Question: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks
prescribed by MoUD? (75 words)

Ans: There is no sewerage network & hence no collection & no treatment. The septage disposal
is irregular and mostly to open drains. Hence the gap in these service level with regard to
benchmarks prescribed by MoUD is 100% .

Question: Does city has separate drainage system or sewer lines take care of storm
water? (50 words)
Ans: Yes, the city is having partly separate drainage system.
Coverage of latrines (individual or community), Please provide information in
Table 2.2 A

Total number of HH without individual

Total number of HH ( a) Coverage of latrines
Zone No or community toilets within walking
(%),(a-b)/a*100%
distance b

1 4498 1709 62%

2 8298 3153 62%
3 7325 2784 62%
Total 20121 7646

SEWERAGE NETWORK AND COLLECTION OF SEWERAGE

Question: How much of the area of the city is covered by sewerage network?
What is the status of household connections in each zone? What are the areas
covered under septage? Provide information in Table

Table 2.2b : Sewerage network and collection of sewage

Coverage of
Total No. of Households with
Zone No sewerage
Households(HH) Sewerage
network services
Network
a (b/a)*100%
b

1 4498 0 0
2 8298 0 0
3 7325 0 0

Question: Are there any areas where sewer lines have been laid but still
households are not connected to sewer lines? Are there any areas where
toilets may be connected to sewer lines but kitchen or bathroom waste are not
connected to sewerage system? (75 words)
Ans: Such condition does not arise.

Question: Is there any systematic and organized method to collect and treat waste from
septic tanks? What is the duration of cleaning of septic tanks (monthly, quarterly,
semiannually or annually)? Indicate status of overflows of septic tanks, either in the
nearby drains /open fields/ sewerage lines etc? (75 words)

Ans: At present there is no systematic and organized method to collect and treat waste
from septic tanks. Only 1 (one ) nos. of Cess Pool emptier are available which is not sufficient for
systematic and organized cleaning. As there is no organized method of collection in
many of the cases, the septic tanks overflow either into nearby drains /open fields
etc.
 Question: What is the situation of O&M of the existing sewerage system? Does the city
has routine maintenance system or breakdown maintenance system? What is the
duration of cleaning of sewer lines (monthly, quarterly, semiannually or annually)?
Indicate infrastructure available for O&M of the sewerage system i.e sewer jetting
machines etc? (100 words)

Ans: Does not arise, since there is no sewerage system .

SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM

Question: Does city has Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)? Which areas are covered under
each of the STPs? Provide details in Table 2.3

Table 2.3: Status of Existing STPs :

Capacity Inflow in the Efficiency in

Sr. No Location zone
(MLD) STP (MLD) %

1 NIL

2 NIL

3 NIL

Question: Does decentralized waste treatment system exists or planned in the city? If
yes, provide details (75 words)

Ans: There is no decentralized waste treatment system in the city

Question: How much of sewerage is generated in the city? How much of this sewerage
generated reaches the STPs? What is the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) of incoming
and outgoing sewage of each STP? (100 words)

Ans: NIL. Since there is no sewer collection & treatment system, no sewage reaches the STP.

Question: Is treated sewage being reused or recycled? Is treated water being used for
irrigation or industrial purpose? Does the option of power generation being explored? (75
words)

Ans: No.

INSTITUTIONAL RAMEWORK

Question: Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding,
service provision in table

Table: 2.4: Functions, roles, and responsibilities

Planning and
Construction/Implementation O&M
Design
Planning and design Project team headed by divisional PE OWSSB supported by
O & M team headed by Municipal
Cell in Ms of , PMU and PDMC . There will be MuU between Municipality
Engineer of Bhadrak Municipality.
OWSSB and State Govt/ OWSSB for implementation.
Question: Please also detail that how city is planning to execute projects. Shall the
implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation or any parastatal body?
(75 words)

Ans: Implementation of project will done by Orissa Water Supply & Sewerage Board
2. Bridge the Gap
Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives
undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to
bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 & 6.3,
Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome
of assessment and meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.
Question: List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to
address these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for
sewerage system under different schemes with status and when the existing projects
are scheduled to be completed? Provide information in Table

Table: 2 . 5 Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

Scheme Cost in Month of Status (as on

Sr. No Name of Project
name Rs Cr completion ddmm 2015
NIL 0

Total 0

Question: How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in
sewerage system? Will completion of above will improve the coverage of network and
collection efficiency? If yes, how much. (100 words)

Ans: The existing system will be able to address the existing gap by 0%. Since no on going
scheme, ongoing/ sanctioned system will be able to improve 0% network and collection
efficiency.

Question: Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What
kind of services will be required to fulfill the gap?

Ans: Yes, the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services. It needs
sewerage system and treatment.

Question: How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects by
changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to
focusing on optimum use of existing assets?
Table 2.6: Demand Gap Assessment.
2015 2021
Component Ongoing
Existing Total Demand Gap
projects

Sewerage net work km 0 0 0 166.06 166.06

No of Households covered
under sewerage system 0 0 0 23119 23119
(2021 demand)
Sewerage treatment plant
0 0 0 9.8 9.8
MLD (2030 demand)

Note: The demand gap will be fulfilled as per requirement of CPHEEO Mannual.
Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects,
calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for sewerage network, number
of household to be provided with connections, and required enhancement in capacity of
STP (MLD), area to be covered under septage management. Based on the demand and
gap assessment, evolve objectives to achieve bridging this gap.

Question: Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of
assessment?
Ans: Yes

Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?
Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.

Ans: Yes, each objective meets the opportunity to bridge the gap.
3. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost

The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to
address these gaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines;
Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9). This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost estimate
with broad source of funding will be explored for each alternative. While identifying the
possible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and its solutions including status of
completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please reply following questions in not
more than 200 words.

Question: What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the
objectives?

Ans: The activities are sewer net work, treatment and house connection to meet the objective for
universal coverage of sewerage system.

Question: How can the activities be converged with other programmes like JICA/ ADB
funded projects in the city etc?

Ans: Does not arise.

Question: What are the options of completing the ongoing activities?

Ans: here does not arise. But done Through State Govt and other funding.
Question: How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learnt
during implementation of these projects?

Ans: The bottlenecks that is disposal arrangements, reuse of treated waste water etc learnt have
been addressed and shall be taken care during implementation of these projects under
AMRUT.

Question: Has projects includes O&M of sewerage system?

Ans: Yes.

Question: What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs? Can the option of
sale of treated wastewater be applicable to recover the O&M cost.

Ans: Collection of of new connection fees and monthly sewerage fees.

Question: What are innovative alternative solutions explored in achieving objectives?

Ans: Options for STP methodology and innovation that is reuse of treated waste water explored
in achieving objectives.

Question: Are different options of PPP such as Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT),

Design Built Finance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) are considered?

Ans: Yes, Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT) will be considered.

Question: How the recycle and reuse of waste water will be done? How much quantity of
treated water may be reused?
Ans: Does not arise.

Question: Have you analysed best practices and innovative solutions in sewerage
sector? Is any of the practice be replicated in the city?
Ans: Yes.

Question: Have you identified the areas for decentralized waste treatment system? Explore
the approaches for septage management i.e People Public Private Partnership (PPPP)
model or replacing septic tanks by bio-digesters, bioremediation etc.

Ans: Decentralized waste treatment system provided.

The alternative activities to meet these activities be defined as per Table 2.7

Table2.7 Alternative Activities To Meet Objectives

Sl. No Objective Activities Financing Source

Universal coverage with Sewerage system and construction of STP,
1 AMRUT
sewerage system re use of treated waste water.

4. Citizen Engagement
Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be
prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize these activities and their
scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para
6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please reply following questions in not more than 200 words.
Question: Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?
Ans: Yes

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?

Ans: Yes

Question: Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?

Ans: Yes through website under active process.

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Ans: Proposed proposal is well appreciated.

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?
Ans: Yes.

Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Ans: Keeping in mind how the house holds can be well covered under sewerage facilities
opted for achieving early coverage of the gap assessed under AMRUT.
5. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up
based on the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing
projects, please reply following questions in not more than 200 words.

Question: What are sources of funds?

Ans: State Govt. fund/ Govt. of India fund

Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?

Ans: Yes
Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?
Ans: Yes.

Question: Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for
prioritization of activities?
Ans: Yes.
6. Conditionalities
Describe the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability of land, environmental
obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval and permission
needed to implement the project. Please reply following questions in not more than 100 words.
Ans: Govt land has been identified and available. Envoronmental clearance applied and other
clearances / NOC are under process.
7. Resilience
Required approvals will be sought from competent authority and organisations. The resilience
factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Please reply
following questions in not more than 100 words.

Ans: The proposed project under AMRUT and ongoing/ sanctioned would be builtin to ensure
environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Also Odisha State Pollution Board requirements
shall be adhered to.
8. Financial Plan
Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of
capital cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on the
investment requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for the
complete life cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 4,
6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders
(Centre, State and City) including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. While
preparing finance plan please reply following questions in not more than 200 words
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?

Yes, projects proposed include O&M for 5 years. O&M shall be integral part of the execution
contract so that the agency/contractor who develops the assets shall be responsible for post
asset creation O&M for 5 years. The O&M cost for Water Supply shall be borne by the
OWSSB (Odisha Water Supply and Sewerage Board).

 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,
ULBs and)

Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.

 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?

Yes, it includes convergence with various ongoing projects under different schemes
supported by both Central & State grant.

 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?

Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 8.1

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. These
tables are based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

Table 8.1 Master Plan of Sewerage Projects for Mission period

Infrastructure Improvement
Project Name and Code6 (list all projects Estimated
Change in Service Levels
Sr. to achieve universal coverage in the City Cost
No. separately for water supply and Year in which
sewerage Priority Year in which to (Amount in Rs.
proposed to be
number be implemented Cr.)
completed
Sewerage System for BHADRAK , Zone
1 1 – Sewer network 2 2016-17 2017 - 18 55.91
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/01
Sewerage System for BHADRAK, Zone
2 1 – STP & Pumping Stations. 3 2016-17 2017 - 18 12.21
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/02
Sewerage System for BHADRAK, Zone
3 2 – Sewer network 4 2016-17 2018-19 127.89
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/03
Sewerage System for BHADRAK, Zone
4 2– STP & Pumping Stations. 5 2016-17 2018-19 22.55
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/04
Septage Management for BHADRAK
5 1 2015-16 2015-16 3.35
AMRUT / OD / BHADRAK / SG/05
Grand Total Total AMRUT 221.91
on going 0
 Table 8.2: Master Service Levels Improvements during Mission Period
(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines)
Infrastructure Improvement
Estimated
Change in Service Levels
Sl. Cost
Project Name and code7 Physical
No. (Amount in
components Existing After
Indicator Rs. Cr)
(As-is) (To-be)
Sewerage System for BHADRAK a .Coverage
Sewer network &
1 , Zone 1 – Sewer network b. Collection 0% 100% 55.91
house connection
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/01 efficiency
Sewerage System for
STP, Pumping main Sewage
BHADRAK, Zone 1 – STP &
2 and Pumping treatment & 0% 100% 12.21
Pumping Stations.
Stations disposal
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/02
Sewerage System for
a .Coverage
BHADRAK, Zone 2 – Sewer Sewer network &
3 b.Collection 0% 100% 127.89
network AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK house connection
efficiency
/SG/03
Sewerage System for
STP, Pumping main Sewage
BHADRAK, Zone 2– STP &
4 and Pumping treatment & 0% 100% 22.55
Pumping Stations.
Stations disposal
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/04
Septage Management for
FSM & Treatment Collection &
5 BHADRAK AMRUT / OD / 0% 100% 3.35
work Treatment
BHADRAK / SG/05

Total 221.91

Table 8.3 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Sewerage Projects

(Rs. in Cr.)
Share
Total
Sector Project Others Total in
cost GoI State ULB
(OUIDF ) Cr

Sewerage and Septage management

Proposed Projects
Sewerage System for BHADRAK , Zone 1 – Sewer
55.91 0 0 0
network AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/01
Sewerage System for BHADRAK, Zone 1 – STP &
12.21 0 0 0
Pumping Stations. AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/02
Sewerage System for BHADRAK, Zone 2 – Sewer
127.89 0 0 0
network AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/03
Sewerage System for BHADRAK, Zone 2– STP &
22.55 0 0 0
Pumping Stations. AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/04
Septage Management for BHADRAK AMRUT / OD /
3.35 1.675 1.675 3.35
BHADRAK / SG/05

Total 3.35
Table 8.4: Annual Fund Sharing Break-up for Sewerage Projects

Convergence
Sr. State ULB

Others
Total in
Project GoI

Others
14thFC
14th Cr
No. Others Total Total
FC

Sewerage System for

BHADRAK , Zone 1 – Sewer
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
network
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/01
Sewerage System for
BHADRAK, Zone 1 – STP &
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pumping Stations.
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/02
Sewerage System for
BHADRAK, Zone 2 – Sewer
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
network AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK
/SG/03
Sewerage System for
BHADRAK, Zone 2– STP &
4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pumping Stations.
AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK /SG/04
Septage Management for
5 BHADRAK AMRUT / OD / 1.675 1.675 1.675 3.350
BHADRAK / SG/05
Total 3.350

Table 8.5:Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)
Annual Targets

Total (Increment from the Baseline Value)

Proposed
Project Indicator Baseline
Projects
Cost in Cr FY 2016 / 2015-16 FY FY FY FY
H1 H2 2017 2018 2019 2020
Ongoing
Sewerage 0
Project
Sewerage and
Septage
Management
1. Coverage of latrines
(individual or 62% 68% 74% 93% 100% 100% 100%
community)
2. Coverage of
sewerage network 0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 100% 100%
services
3. Efficiency of
0% 0% 0% 0% 30% 100% 100%
Collection of Sewerage
4. Efficiency in
0% 0% 10% 10% 40% 100% 100%
treatment
Urban Transport
 Mission Management Information System

SECTOR WISE SLIP TEMPLATE: URBAN TRANSPORT

Under AMRUT Mission, Urban Transport components which are admissible are; Side- walks, Foot-
over bridges, Non-motorized transport (NMT), Buses, BRTS, Multi-level parking, Waterways Ferry
vessels Ferries and Waterways. (AMRUT Guidelines; para3).

1. Service Level Gaps Assessment

1.SERVICELEVELSTATUS

Assess the existing transportation situation and service levels gaps for indicators urban to achieve
service level benchmarks. (AMRUT Guidelines Table.1.4 & Table2.5). Service Level gaps will be
analyzed as per indicators prescribed in Service Level Benchmarks (SLBs) for urban transport of
MoUD, GoI. Please provide information in200 words responding to the following questions;

Question: What is the baseline information available for improvement city transportation? Whether
City has prepared City Mobility Plan? If yes then, Does CMP includes NMT, Ferries, water ways?

Answer:

A City Development Plan (CDP) has been prepared and is in the finalization process. A Detailed
Project Report (DPR) for City bus services has been prepared which elucidates the future
requirement of the city bus fleet and all other infrastructure required. The present rolling stock
structure for the City has been identified through the DPR. There is no other respective document
that studies the city transportation situation. There is a proposal for preparing a City Mobility Plan
(CMP) in the near future which includes the study of NMT but not the study of Waterways or
ferries..

There are four Levels of Services (LOS) which will be calculated considering various indicators as
LOS1, LOS2, LOS3 and LOS4 correspond to adequacy and quality of city’s available transportation
services. The summary of the service level gap and performance should be presented as per
illustrative Table

Table: Service level Benchmark

Present
Levels of Service as per SLB,
Sl. No Indicators Service
MoUD
Level
Level of
Range
Service Service
Coverage of 1 >=1
1 urban 4
2 0.7-1
transport in
the city 3 0.3-0.7
4 <0.3
 Level of
Availability of Range
Service
urban
2 transport per 1 >=0.6 4
1000 2 0.4-0.6
population 3 0..2-0.4
4 <=0.2

Question: Have level of services (LOS) been calculated based on the indicators prescribed in the
SLB for urban transport by Ministry of Urban Development? As per MoUD SLB for urban transport,
there are four Levels of Services (LOS) which will be calculated considering various indicators as
LOS1, LOS2, LOS3 and LOS4 correspond to adequacy and quality of city’s available transportation
services.

Answer:Yes

Question: While assessing the above indicators, also analyze following aspects as an outcome of
the broad components of urban transport under AMRUT;

a) Non-Motorised Transport Facilities

1. % of network covered

2. Encroachment on NMT roads by vehicle parking (%) -

3. NMT parking facilities at interchanges (%) - 1

Answer:

No NMT Parking facilities available in Bhadrak

b) Parking: Availability of parking spaces

Answer: Bonth Chakk, New Bus Stand, Charampa (Near Kailash Talkies), Burma Bye-pass, Front
of Tehsil Office, Budhwar Hut, Kodumbeda (Old Veterinary Office), Haldidua Square

Question: Have specific issues for the city been identified and addressed including issues with the
existing traffic, NMT, parking / transport environment?

Answer:

81% of the roads in the city are surfaced; the road widths in the central areas of the city are much
lesser at 8-10 feet with medium density with concentration of residential population and commercial
and institutional activities on both sides. Condition of pucka roads is very poor at many of the
places and water logging is a common phenomenon. The major roads in city are O.T Road,
Katchari Road, Purna Bazar etc. comprised of commercial activities. Encroachment, concentration
of informal activities and high pedestrian population is also high on the roads in core.

Traffic Congestion: O.T Road, Katchari Road, Purna Bazar are the key congested areas in
Bhadrak.
Road Accidents: The number of traffic accidents reported in Bhadrak till June 2014 was135.
Numbers of accidents are increasing every year with average annual growth rate of 41%. The
continuous increase in accidents in Bhadrak city can be attributed to the growing vehicular traffic,
faulty public transportation and lack of pedestrian facilities. Major accident prone areas are NH and
bypass road.

Few important issues are: Lack of grade separation at railway crossings, Narrow width of internal
roads, Parking issue, Congestion at Major Junctions, Lack of public transport facilities, Lack of
traffic, enforcement rules, Lack of footpath, Encroachments on roads, Shortage of street lights

Sidewalks, Foot-over bridges and NMT

Question: Do you think city roads are safe for pedestrians? If no then, which section of roads
needs immediate attention?

Answer:

1. Road from Mahatab Statue to Dahanigadia.

2. Road from kacheri bazaar chhaka to Banka Bazar Chaka.
3. Road from GosalaChhaka to Puruna Bazar Chhak.
4. Road from Charampa to Railway Station.

Question: What type of Non-Motortised Vehicle (NMV) infrastructure available in the city?

1. Lanes reserved for NMV

2. Footpath allocated for both pedestrian and NMV
3. Area allocated to NMV parking

Answer:No such Provision have been made

Question: Has budget provision for NMT included in the transportation projects in the city?

Answer:No

Buses and BRTS

Question: Have city initiated feasibility of BRTS?

Answer:No

Question: What kind of public transport is available in the city? Please mentionNumber of public
transport vehicles operating in the city.

Answer:City Bus Services - 24 buses has been sanctioned, Town buses - 18

Question: What is the total length of public transport corridor in the city limits?

Answer:Around 30 kms
Multi-level parking

Question: Whether city has designated parking spaces? If yes, provide list of

Answer:

Autrorised:None

Unauthorized: BonthChakk, New Bus Stand, Charampa (Near Kailash Talkies), Burma Bye-pass,
Front of Tehsil Office, Budhwar Hut, Kodumbeda (Old Veterinary Office), Haldidua Square

Question: What is the total available on street paid parking spaces on Arterial, sub arterial roads?

Answer: None

Question: Whether parking supply inventory is available for the city including; Types of on-road
and off road parking restrictions (time of day, duration, private etc)

Answer: On road &Off road parking restriction has been imposed by the police only in market
areas.

Time of day: None, Duration: None

Question: Whether parking facilities available for bicycles, auto rickshaw, goods delivery.

Answer: Railway Station, New Bus Stand, Kacheri Gate (front),

Question: Is private sector involved in parking?

Answer:No

Question: Whether adopted parking bans/restrictions on major roads.

Answer: NESCO (front), Kacheri Chhak area upto DSP House, Banka Chhak, Kali Mandir Chhak,
Bondh Chhak (East, South, North zone), Old Bus Stand (East Side), Market Area

Waterways and Ferry vessels

If city has waterways system then provide following questions;

Question: Whether city has inland waterways system?

Answer:No

Question: Who is managing and operating the ferry system? if any

Answer:No

Question: Provide number of ferry vessels

Answer:No
Institutional Set Up

Describe the institutional framework including role and responsibilities in terms; administration and
Policy making, planning, Vehicle Registration, public transportation operators including Private
operators and overall traffic management.

Role and Responsibilities of all the agencies shall be provided in the illustrative table No. 2

Table: Role and responsibility of agencies involved in management of City transport

Sl. NO Agencies Responsibilities

1 Regional Transport Authority Registration of vehicles
2 District Police Traffic Management
3 District Administration Planning
4 Bus Syndicate Private bus management
5 BBUTT City Bus Service

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions;

Question: Who is responsible for management of urban transport in the city?

Answer:1. R.T.O & District Police.

2. BBUTT for City Bus Service.

Question: Is there enough provisions for enforcement of traffic rules for pedestrian safety on
roads?

Answer:SP (Police), Regulation by RTO and DA.

Question: How are you planning for execution of transport related projects for AMRUT, whether,
present role and responsibilities lying with these organizations is capable to implement projects
under AMRUT?

Answer:Yes

1.2 Status of On-going Projects

Critically examine the existing and ongoing projects for improvement of urban transport as to be
filled in illustrative Table No.3

Notice: Undefined index: table12_proposed_projects in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransport-result.php on line 312

Approved Cost Status of projects Expenditure(Rs.

Project/Sector Scheme
(Rs. Lakhs) (till May 13) Lakhs)
Non motorized
Nil
Transport
Street Parking Nil
Multi Level Parking Nil
Others Nil
 Question: Whether convergence with other ongoing Central and State and LocalGovernment
Programs/Schemes can be done at this stage.

Answer: Yes, City Bus Service is under process

Question: Whether ongoing scheme and projects has been critically reviewed? Please explain
what is the extent of convergence to bridge the gaps?

Answer: Yes

2. Bridging the Gap

Demand Gap Assessment

Despite the fact, non-motorized modes and public transit account for a significant proportion of
travel activity of a city. The city needs to pursue different strategies and programs for bridging the
gap on transportation facilities where the city is and where it wishes to go in future.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions

Question: What steps can be taken to bridge these gaps? Please explain in 200 words,

Answer: Provision of one way traffic in the main roads, construction of fly over bridges extension
of road width including footpaths, development of parking places , etc are required to be improved.

Whether present level gaps as identified through SLB indicators will be achievable by 2021 as
compare with the present level of gap and demand?. (Table)

Table: Bridging the gap- Demand Assessment

Demand/
Sl. Present Service
Benchmark Levels of Service as per SLB, MoUD Current Gap Target by
No Level
2011
Level of
Range
Service
Service Coverage of 1 >=1
1 4
urban transport in the city 2 0.7-1
3 0.3-0.7
4 <0.3

Level of
Range
Service
Availability of urban
2 transport per 1000 1 >=0.6 4
population 2 0.4-0.6
3 0..2-0.4
4 <=0.2
Other indicators
Percentage of City
3 Covered by footpaths -
wider than 1.2m
Non Motorised Transport
4
Facilities including;
a) % of network covered -
 Encroachment on NMT
b) roads by vehicle parking -
(%)
NMT parking facilities at
c) -
interchanges (%)

Level of
Range
Service
Availability of On-street
5 paid public parking spaces 1 >=75 4
(%) 2 50-75
3 25-50
4 <25
6 Water ways and Ferries -

3. Objectives
The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to address
these gaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines: para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9).

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions;

Question: How will you define your overall goal to improve city transport?
Answer: Appropriate planning is required after proper survey & identifying the needs of the Town.

1) Road Widening to ply City buses

2) Creation of new roads, bye passes
3) Construction of over bridges, flyovers near Khankha (Bridge No 3)
4) Parking places wherever required to decongest roads

Question: What possible strategies envisaged to achieve various LoS to improve the
transportation components under AMRUT?

Answer:

1. Improvement of existing infrastructure i.e. roads & bridges.

2. Separate terminals/ stands for buses, trucks, taxis, cars,auto rickshaw , etc.
3. Improvement of parking places in different locations.
4. Proper traffic management system with traffic signal system.

Question: How well does goals and objective for developing efficient urban transportation facilities
can articulate the use of NMT options and parking facilities to improve the quality of life of local
citizens?

Answer: As Above

Question: How identified each objective can evolve considering bridging the gap with present level
of services as to achieve SLB indicators.

Answer:if another 6 buses will be given under AMRUT Mission ,this Municipality can improve the
level of services.
 Question: How objectives can be framed ensuring sustainable mobility solutions and creating city-
wide NMT facilities for pedestrians and cyclists.

Answer:

1. By widening the road and implementing cycle tracks and pedestrian walkways .
2. By acquisition of more city buses for better accessibility.

Question: Howe objectives for improvement of NMT facilities integrate with other modes of
transport.

Answer:

The objectives need to be framed in such a manner so to provide safe and secure way to promote
walkability and mobility to citizens. Improving main road structure and enforcing the most
congested and crowded zones of the city such as markets, mandis, old city areas, railway station
etc to convert them to NMT zones.

4. Alternate Activities to Meet Objectives

Evolve overall objective is to ensure that mobility solutions for the city that are sustainable and
create city-wide NMT facilities for pedestrians and cyclists and integrate them with other modes of
transport. Suggest possible strategies and options to achieve each objective with estimate cost of
alternate solutions as per table 1 & Table 2

Table1:Possible Strategies to meet objectives

Sl.
Objectives Possible Activities Financing Source
No
Pedestrian walkways, footpaths, cycle tracks,
1 NMT PWD(R&B), Municipality
parks and open spaces
2 Widening of roads Widening of RoW for Sub Arterial roads State Govt.
Proper co-ordination between responsible
3 Integration of Governance State Govt.
authorities
4 City Mobility Plan DPR State Govt & AMRUT
There should be proper arrangement of traffic State Govt & AMRUT
5 Signalisation, Junction Design, Widening of roads
for flow of traffic.
6 Parking Multi level parking Municipality

Table2: Estimated Cost for various possible activities

Sl. Total Cost
Projects Unit Quantity
No (in Cr)
1 Construction of Street Parking, (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/01) No 8 0.50
Preparation of DPR on City Mobility Plan (CMP)
2 No 1 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/02)
3 Augmentation of City Bus fleet, (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/03) Buses 1 10.00
4 Construction of Cycle parking near Bus Stand (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/04) No 1 0.30
5 Upgradation of Bus Depots, (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/05) No 1 0.50
6 Development of Transport Nagar, (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/06) No 1 10.00
7 Construction of Foot Over Bridges, (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/07) No 5 3.00
Construction of Non Motorised Transport facilities (Footpaths & Cycle Tracks &
8 Kms 3 6.00
Cycle Parking), (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/08)
30.80
While addressing alternate solution to achieve these objects, please provide information in 500
words responding to the following questions:

Question: How realistic and feasible urban transport strategies are to be evolved to address key
challenges, priorities as an outcome of the citizen consultation

Answer: With respect to the citizen and stakeholder consultation, there are several actions that
need to be addressed to improve the city wide transportation scenario. Mostly
improving/widening/up-gradation of roads, improved network of CBS, installation of NMT facilities
at congested areas, development of truck terminal, parking areas and rickshaw areas etc

Question: What alternative innovative solution can be adopted for improving the service delivery
by creating

a: Citizen friendly provision of barrier free pedestrian facilities including, footpaths, road marking
and signages

Answer: Vehicle tracking System, automatic pedestrian crossing facility,

b: pathways

Answer: Urban planning with built-in street design,

c: Parking

Answer: Multilevel parking spaces, Zoning near the congested areas to promote NMT

d: traffic management using ITS

Answer: Vehicle tracking System, Surveillance System, GIS based traffic analysis

Question: What strategic intervention is required in the implementation of above projects

Answer: Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), Traffic Management Committees or agencies etc
appointed to overlook and undertake the specific tasks related to the transport criteriasuch as
widening the roads, Creating path way, Proper traffic arrangement

Question: Whether alternative modes of transport such as cycling can be provided in major roads
Answer: Yes. From Mahta Chhak to Charampa (ROW-30 mts, Length – 4 kms),
Question: Whether non-Motorised Transport (NMT) facilities corridor suggested with dedicated
NMV, Cycle track and Signalized Intersection count.

Answer:No

Question: How innovative solutions for alternative modes of transport including NMT such as
cycling, pedestrian and public transportation system will address the overall transportation issue of
the city?

Answer:this would shape the future city transportation in such a way to improve mobility of the city
with barrier free pedestrian movement and enhanced levels of safety and security

Question: What will be the source of funding for identified project?

Answer:Govt. grants under AMRUT

 Question: Whether convergence with other scheme has been made. Please explain each
identified projects and their source of funding such as AMRUT, 14th FC and also converge with
other schemes.

Answer:No

5. Citizen Engagement
Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be prioritized to
meet the service level gaps. The section will summarize the Citizens priorities for adoption of
alternate solution of urban mobility, drawing on SLIPpreparation.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Question: Have all stakeholders including residents (RWAs), Transporters, RTOs,Traffic Police
attended the citizen consultation?

Answer: Yes.

Question: Has alternate proposed crowd sourced?

Answer: Yes. Crowd and stakeholder sourced.

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Answer: The most important criteria for citizens is enhancing the public transport which can cater
to almost all the areas of the city. Secondly, to designate various parking spaces so to decongest
the main roads.

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?

Answer: Yes

Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Answer: Studying the entire area and identifying the loopholes in the service provision.

Question: How citizen has been exposed best practices and smart solutions in order to generate
citizen-driven solutions for urban mobility?

Answer: Through presentations and seminars.

Question: Please examine whether identified solutions are addressing citizens requirement

Answer: Yes

Question: Whether ULB have adequate resources to implement prioritized alternate solutions?

Answer: No.

Question: How innovative alternate options of NMT facilities examined and shared with citizens?

Answer:Yes. Through presentations and study material.

6. Prioritization of projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on
the available resources to meet the respective objective. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2).
Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Question: Are innovative solution prioritized based on the available resources and demand of
citizens?

Answer:Yes

Question: Has source of funding considered while prioritizing the project?

Answer:Yes

Question: Whether project has been prioritized considering last mile connectivity?

Answer:No

Table1:Possible Strategies to meet objectives

Priority Financing
Project Cost (in Cr.)
No Source
1 Road Improvements 72.24 State/AMRUT
2 Augmentation of CBS 10.00 State/AMRUT
3 Over Bridges 6.00 State/AMRUT
4 DPR on City Mobility Plan 0.50 State/AMRUT
5 Parking spaces identified 0.50 State/AMRUT
6 Cycle parking near Bus Stand 0.03 State/AMRUT
7 Upgradation of Bus Depots 0.50 State/AMRUT
8 Development of Transport Nagar 10.00 State/AMRUT
9 Foot Over Bridges 3.00 State/AMRUT
Construction of Non Motorised Transport facilities (Footpaths &
10 6.000 State/AMRUT
Cycle Tracks & Cycle Parking )

7. Out of Box Solution Used

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Question: What are the out of box thinking on alternative and new innovativesolutions for the
following;

a: Citizen friendly provision of barrier free pedestrian facilities including, footpaths, road marking
and signages,

Answer: Escalators and underpasses for pedestrian movement, solar lighting and panels for
signages and road marking.

b: pathways

Answer: Escalators and travelators, automated Subway Systems for pedestrian movement
 c: parking

Answer: Automated Valet System, Mobile integrated citizen info systems, parking line alarms,

d: traffic management using ITS

Answer: Real Time Vehicle tacking using Satellite imagery

Question: Whether solution provided to improve the safety of vulnerable groups such as old
age/handicapped/children

Answer:Yes

8. Conditionalities Fulfilled and Resilience Built-in

First and foremost condition is to identify the availability of land for projects such as parking,
widening of roads for pedestrian, cycle tracks and hawkers zone. Further, agencies need to be
brought on board for any new initiatives as part of convergence process and necessary approval
and permissions.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Question: Whether described the conditionalities of each project in terms ofavailability of land
parking, widening of roads for pedestrian, cycle tracks and hawkers zone?

Answer: Yes, Regarding land parking, this Municipality has selected five to six places & proposals
have been sent to Govt. for alienation. For widening of roads, the matter has been taken up with
PWD.

Question: How these projects will be funded? Are projects being implemented through own
sources or borrowing then which is the commitment in this regard.

Answer: Only Govt. grant is the source of fund

Question: Has environmental obligation such as clearances and NOC required? Please suggest
action and initiatives need to be taken in this regards

Answer: Clearance & NOC will be obtained as per Govt. guidelines

9. Financial Plan
Prepare Financial Plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development. The financial plan
will include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State, ULBs and) including financial
convergence with various ongoing projects. Describe briefly the institutional arrangement),
leveraging potential partnerships, convergence with other Government Schemes, monitoring and
evaluation and also provide year-wise milestones and outcomes.

 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating infrastructure
projects? Explain in 200 words how these institutional arrangements are leveraging
partnership and converge with government scheme and provide list of individual projects
which is being financed by various stakeholders.
 The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULB do
not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence and
consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered under
other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned for
projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on 50:
50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultation for
involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.
 What are the different sources of funding being tapped for this project.(75 words)
Own Source, PPP mode and CSR source of funding will be tapped
 Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has been
categorized based on financial considerations (100 words)
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contribute
required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will be met
from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have been categorized
based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUT scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out? Please provide the list. (100 words)
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.

10. Finalization of Master Service Level Improvement Plan

Question: Discuss Draft Master Service Level Improvement Plan with citizen. Based on the final
citizen consultations, prepare final Master Service Level Improvement Plan. Annual Plan will be
prepared as an application for monitoring the improvement in achieving the service level indicators
as targeted in the Service level improvement plan. (AMRUT Guideline; Table 2.1, 2.2, 2.3., 2.4 and
2.5) and Annual Plan (AMRUT Guidelines; Annexure-2, 3, 4, 5& 6)

Answer:

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. These tables are
based on amrut guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

MASTER SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS DURING MISSION PERIOD

(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)

Notice: Undefined index: table6_sno in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.phpOn line 869

Sl. Change in Service Levels Estimated Cost

Project Name Physical Components
No Indicator Existing Proposed (Cr)
Construction of Street Parking
1 Off Street Parking 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/01)
Preparation of DPR on City Mobility
DRP to study feasibility
2 Plan (CMP) 0.50
of NMT, CBS etc
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/02)
 Augmentation of City Bus fleet
3 Bus Fleet 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle parking near Bus
4 Cycle parking 0.30
Stand (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/04)
Upgradation of Bus Depots
5 Depots and terminal 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/05)
Development of Transport Nagar
6 Truck Logistic Hub 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/06)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
7 O&M 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/07)
Construction of Non Motorised
Footpaths & Cycle
8 Transport facilities 6.00
Tracks & Cycle Parking
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/08)
30.80

ANNUALFUNDSHARINGPATTERNFORSEWERAGE PROJECTS
(As per Table 2.3.1 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)
Notice: Undefined index: table7_sno in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.phpOn line 917

Total Project Share

Sl. No Name of Project
Cost GoI State ULB Others Total
Construction of Street Parking
1 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/01)
Preparation of DPR on City Mobility Plan (CMP)
2 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet
3 10.00 5.00 5.00 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle parking near Bus Stand
4 0.30 0.15 0.15 0.30
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/04)
Upgradation of Bus Depots
5 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/05)
Development of Transport Nagar
6 10.00 5.00 5.00 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/06)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
7 3.00 1.50 1.50 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/07)
Construction of Non Motorised Transport facilities
8 6.00 3.00 3.00 6.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/08)
15.4
30.80 15.40 30.80
0
ANNUAL FUND SHARING BREAK-UP FOR SEWERAGE PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

Notice: Undefined index: table8_sno in /var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.php
Online973

State ULB
Sl. No Project GoI Convergence Others Total
14th FC Others Total 14th FC Others Total
Construction of Street Parking
1 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/01)
Preparation of DPR on City Mobility Plan (CMP)
2 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet
3 5.00 5.00 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle parking near Bus Stand
4 0.15 0.15 0.30
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/04)
Upgradation of Bus Depots
5 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/05)
Development of Transport Nagar
6 5.00 5.00 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/06)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
7 1.50 1.50 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/07)
Construction of Non Motorised Transport facilities
8 3.00 3.00 6.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/08)
Total 15.40 15.40 30.80
YEAR WISE PLAN FOR SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Notice: Undefined index: table9_proposed_projects
in/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransport-result.php on line 1033

Annual Targets
Sl. Project Indicat Baselin (Increment from the Baseline Value)
Proposed Projects FY 2016
No Cost or e FY FY FY FY
H1 H2 2017 2018 2019 2020
Construction of Street Parking
1 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/01)
Preparation of DPR on City Mobility Plan
2 (CMP) 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet
3 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle parking near Bus
4 0.30
Stand, (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/04)
Upgradation of Bus Depots
5 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/05)
Development of Transport Nagar
6 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/06)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
7 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/07)
Construction of Non Motorised Transport
8 6.00
facilities, (AMRUT/OD/BHADRAK/UT/08)
Total 30.80
Urban Transport
 Mission Management Information System

PARKS AND PLAY GROUNDS

The objective of this template is to assist ULBs in preparation of SLIP for Green Space and Parks
component for rejuvenation of at least one park in each of the 500 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs)
involving creation and upgradation of basic elements, especially for the youth, children and the
elderly. Rejuvenation also includes involving local citizens and groups in the maintenance and
upkeep of the park in order to make the development sustainable. Cost of this component will be met
from the 2.5 per cent annual allocation for development of parks under the Mission and used in
accordance with its Guidelines. (Refer AMRUT Guidelines: Section 5.1 Sr.No.6, 6.7 & Annexure-1
Sr.No.4) SLIP would involve write up on following sections:

1. Assess the Service Level Gap

First and foremost aspect of SLIP is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for
organised Green Space and Parks based on standards prescribed in URDPFI Guidelines (Refer
AMRUT Guidelines; Para 3.1.6 & 6.2). This shall also include describing existing institutional
framework vis-à-vis development and maintenance of organised green space/ parks. In order to
assess the service level gap the City shall have to review all policies, plans; scheme documents etc.,
hold discussions with concerned officials and citizens, as per the requirement and conduct physical
assessment of city parks to understand the current status (Refer Indicative Parks Assessment Tool
as given in Annex-1 of this document). The city should undertake overall assessment of Parks and
Open/ Green Space in terms of a) Physical Activities Resources, b) Family Facilities including child
friendly play equipment’s, c) Available General Services and Facilities, and, d) Aesthetics and other
While discussing about the existing status of the organised green space in your city make a sincere
effort to analyze the proportion of area under the categorization of parks as per URDPFI Guidelines
eg: Housing Area Park (HAP), Neighbourhood Park (NP) Community Park (CP), District Park (DP),
and Sub-City Park (SCP). Also focus on qualitative aspects of existing parks like geographical
distribution across the city, encroachments, child and elderly friendly features; staffing, maintenance
& equipment issues; and maintenance by RWAs/ Corporates under their CSR Activities etc.

Please respond to the questions given below (Word Limit: 800 words).

Question: What are the available data sources/ plans/ reports/ schemes that exist as regards
development and maintenance of parks?
Bhadrak municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks such as name of the park,
area, O&M costs and brief description about the parks apart from this there is a CDP report
mentioning about this sector in the Land use Pattern. But the existing parks are developed with the
help of state government and maintenance of the parks is covered in the municipal expenditure

Question: Review the recommendation on open/ green space as per Master Plan/
Development Plan and map existing green cover against the same. Identify the areas where
there is deficiency of open/green space
There is a CDP which provide the landuse 7.51% and stating that green spaces have to be
developed in the city but there is no document where the deficiency of open/green spaces identified
to fill the gap and there is a map showing the existing green space locations for the city.

Question: Does the ULB follow URDPFI Guidelines to categorize its organized greens/ parks/
open space or follow its own categorization? If ULB follow its own categorization, what is the
rationale and how well they are interlinked to development of parks?
Bhadrak municipality does not categorize the parks and open spaces as per the hierarchy of
organized green spaces based on population and area criteria as prescribed by URDPFI guidelines it
only categorizes parks in developed and undeveloped category .

Question: What is the per person open space availability in the city in general and within
built-up areas?
0.75 acres is the cumulative area of developed parks in the Bhadrak town and open spaces and
playgrounds spread over the city for children’s to play and elders to take a fresh walk in the morning
but these play grounds and not equipped with any amenities.

Service Level Status

Present Reliability
Sr. .No Indicators Benchmark Source
Status Factors
Per person open space in plain areas as per
1 0.03 Sq.m 10 -12 Sq. m Municipality C
URDPFI guidelines

Source: URDPFI–2014&AnalysisofULBLevelData

Question: Have the ULB/ City prepared park wise inventory of facilities and amenities? (ULB
should identify some of the quick-win parks, which could be developed with minimal
intervention that can attract good number of citizens)
Bhadrak municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks such as name of the park,
area, O&M costs and brief description about the parks apart from this they identified few parks for
renovation which can attract a lot of people to use the parks and enhancing children friendly features
identified by the municipality will make tem quick-win parks.

Question: How is the physical condition of parks in the city? Do they have boundary wall,
fenced area, facilities of public conveniences, tube well, dustbins etc. (Mention in
proportions, if possible)
Park in Bhadrak municipality are in good physical condition overall , nevertheless the CHACHA
NEHRU PARK needs renovations for lack of toilet facility and park furniture is not in a good shape .

Question: Whether parks have well planned play area encouraging physical activity? Are
they equipped with child friendly play equipment, snack/ ice cream parlors/ kiosks etc.
(Mention in proportions, if possible?)
CHA CHA NEHRU PARK has child friendly equipment but they need renovations. Snack/ ice
cream parlors/ kiosks need to be established.

Question: How well aesthetics component have been built in parks of your city? Are they
well illuminated, landscaped – manicured with water bodies/ fountains etc. wherever
possible? (Mention proportions, if possible)
Park in Bhadrak municipality are in decent aesthetic condition overall, nevertheless CHA CHA
NEHRU PARK has shortage of landscape and park furniture is not in a good shape.

Question: Are there some running schemes/ projects – Central/ State/ Donor funded in the
city as regard development of parks/ open spaces? Or else ULB is funding park
development of parks/ green space out of its own budget?
Development of open spaces, green spaces and parks in Bhadrak are done with the help of state
government and maintenance of the parks is covered by the municipal fund
Question: Explain the process how a park/ open space is normally shortlisted for
development? Does the city have rationale for park selection for development or it is done
on ad-hoc basis.
Bhadrak municipality shortlists the parks/open spaces in a unique process as follows
1. Identification of government lands in the city
2. Gap analysis based on the existing parks coverage
3. Initial prioritization based on the size and coverage of the park
4. Stakeholder consultation by the municipal engineers
5. Citizen consultation and enlightening them with the facts
6. Finally considering all the above aspects the chairperson and counsellors shortlists parks
for development
Question: List the organizations/ authorities/ private sector firms etc. and describe their
roles and responsibilities in development of city parks/ open space along with green area
under their jurisdiction.
No such private sector firms /organizations are involved in the development or maintenance of
any park in the city, all the parks are under the municipal authority and they operate and
maintain.
Question: Where can new parks be developed in the future; how much space may be
available.
Bhadrak municipality has identified few government lands in the municipal jurisdiction where
there is a need for parks but the land is under the state body which has to be transferred to the
municipality so that they can plan and execute the projects.
Question: How much is allocated under Parks/ Open/ Recreational space as per the DP or
Master Plan for new areas?
DP which provide the land use 7.51% and stating that green spaces have to be developed in the
city but there is no allocated under Parks/ Open/ Recreational space as per the DP or Master
Plan for new areas.
Question: Who manages the parks in the city? How much delegation of responsibility has
been given to RWAs and/or NGOs?
Parks are undertaken by the municipality, no NGO’s delegation of responsibility has been given.
Question: Which parks have uneasy accessibility issues or get flooded/water logged etc.?
All the existing parks are easy to access and there is no such problem of flooding/water logging
etc transpired in the parks.
Question: Does the ULB have any guidelines for providing safe and secure access to
parks for children and elders?
Private architects are hired for designing the parks and then the plans are reviewed by the
internal technical experts with regard to safety, security and universal accessibility measures
taken in the design and then finalize the plan for execution which makes parks in Bhadrak safe
and secure for all age groups.
Question: Is there a system for preventing the entry of animals into parks?
Existing park in the BHADRAK municipality are with the boundary wall so there is not even a
single event occurred in the past few years that the animals entering the parks.
Question: Does the city have any guidelines for horticulture; types of trees and plants,
etc?
City has not specifically followed any guidelines for horticulture or selecting type of trees or
plants .the plan given by the landscape architect is followed and implemented on field because
of shortage if capacity in that sector.

Table2:Jurisdiction wise–Allocation of Green space and Parks

Area of Parks Proportion (in

Sr. No Jurisdiction No. of Parks
(in hec) Percentage)

1 ULB 1 0.3 100

2 Development Authority 0 0

Private Ownership -
3 Corporate/NGO's 0 0 0

Total 1 0.3 100

Table3: Hierarchy of Organized Greens in the City (As per URDPFI-2014)

Area under the category % Area under parks

Sr. No Category No. of Parks
(in hec) and open spaces

Housing Area Park (HAP) (Less than

1 1 0.3 100
5000 Sq.m.)

Neighbourhood Park (NP)(5000 -10000

2 0 0 0
sq.m.)

Community Park (CP) (10000 - 50000

3 0 0 0
sq.m

District Park (DP)

4 0 0 0
(50000 – 250000 Sq.m.)

Sub-City Park (SCP) (2,50,000sq.m. &

5 0 0 0
above )

2. Bridge the Gap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, list out initiatives undertaken in
different ongoing programs/ projects/ master – development plans to address these gaps. While
bridging the gaps convergence with other ongoing Central, State and Local Government
Programs/ Schemes will also be looked into. Based on above, objectives will be developed to
bridge the gaps (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified
objectives will be evolved from the outcome of physical assessment of parks using “Assessment
Tools for Parks” (Refer Annex-1 of this document) and meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.

As per para 5.1 (Sr.No.6) of AMRUT guidelines all projects involving development of green
spaces & parks shall have to make special provision for child friendly components and establish
a system of maintenance with local residents participation. At least one park from each of the
500 ULBs under AMRUT would be taken up for developing facilities for Children, Youth and
Elderly.
Assessment of the current status of City parks/ open spaces would clearly bring out the gap/
dearth of open spaces in terms of area allocation, having inadequate citizen friendly features and
issues pertaining to its maintenance. And these will lead to formulation of three broad objectives.

Please respond to the following questions in not more than 500 words

Question: Have the city took physical assessment of city parks? (ULB’s may refer Annex-
1 indicative procurement of this document)

Question: Estimate the demand gap of open/green space in the city.

The demand gap of the city is 498 acres as per URDPFI Guidelines

Question: Explain how the city plans to fill the gap in green cover and progressively
enhance green cover within City to 15% over next 5 years. ?
Bhadrak municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks and decided to
construct a park every year and renovate the existing facilities so that they can fill the gap in
green cover and within next decade green cover in te city will be close to 15 %.

Question: Assess and describe, if requisite provisions as per Master Plan and other
State legislation have already been made?
No requisite provisions as per Master Plan and other State legislation have already been made

Question: Explain the city’s action plans to make special provisions for installing child
friendly components in the city parks as per AMRUT Guidelines. ?
The Cha Cha Nehru Park in the Bhadrak municipality is built exclusively for Children and well
equipped with child friendly components.

Question: Provide details of the initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and
projects to address the gaps in enhancing the green cover and rejuvenation/ development
of parks. Provide information in Table 4.
There are no ongoing projects in this sector as the city is concerned
Tabel4:StatusofOngoing/Sanctioned/Committed Projects

Name of the Scheme Cost in Rs. Month of Status (as on dd

Sr. No. Project Name Lakhs Completion mm 2015)

OBJECTIVES
Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps. While developing
objectives following question shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate objective.

Question: Please provide a set of 2-3 objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100
words.
 1. Installation of child friendly equipment
2. Image of wild life to be conserved
3. Urban greenery in prioritization through plantation on both sides of all pivot routes
4. Identification of huge vacant lands in the city to build parks
3. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost
Suggest alternatives/ options to complete the ongoing projects pertaining to developing
parks and green spaces. Identify quick-win parks and open space which can also have
play area and associated facilities for Children, Youth & Elderly. Also identify & describe
the prevailing models of parks development & maintenance in your city? Any new model
your city wishes to adopt? (Word Limit: 200 Words)
City is trying to incorporate the industries surrounded by to take reasonability and develop parks
as part of corporate social responsibility to compensate the pollution created by tm in the city
.these are in the stages of discussion but under implementation

Tabel 4: Cost Estimates for Park Development

Sr. No. Component Rate Amount in Rs.

1 Boundary wall 2000 3230000

2 Jogging track 150 3412631.25
3 Gate 200000 1000000
4 fountain 250000 1250000
5 Toilet 200000 1400000
6 Garden Bench/Sitting 5000 140000
7 Lawn 100 14954908.5
8 Shade loving foliage Plants 200 12000
9 Gate Light 7500 45000
10 Focus Light 5000 30000
11 Coffee Stall 25000 125000
12 Snacks Centre 25000 150000
13 sliders 15000 150000
14 See-saw 10000 150000
15 Swing 5000 55000
Grand Total 26104539.75

As per AMRUT guidelines half of Rs. Cr. may be sought from Government of India under the
scheme and balance could be explored and converged from other sources like 14th Finance
Commission, State Government (Park Development Fund) and CSR Activities of Corporate
Groups active in the City.
4. Citizen Engagement
ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on the
suggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative pertaining to development and
maintenance models for parks will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be
prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up
based on the available resources. (Refer AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please
explain following questions detailing out the needs, aspirations and wishes of the local people.
(Word Limit: 250 Words)
Question: Has all relevant stakeholders groups been involved in the consultation?
Private architects are hired for designing the parks and then the plans are reviewed by the
internal technical experts and then the discussions are carried out to the all relevant stakeholders
groups
Question: Explore option for O&M Contracts including PPPP with (RWAs/ Citizens
Groups/ Corporate Groups – CSR, Selling advertisement rights etc.).
City is trying to incorporate the industries surrounded by to take reasonability and develop parks
as part of corporate social responsibility to compensate the pollution created by tm in the city
.these are in the stages of discussion but under implementation
Question: Explain how the city plans to establish a system of maintenance with active
citizen’s engagement as per AMRUT Guidelines.
Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city
Ward level consultations are done after the stakeholder consultation and they are used for
prioritization of the projects
Question: Has alternatives explored are crowd sourced?
No
Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?
3 times consultation programs were held under the chairmanship of collector Bhadrak for
development of Bhadrak town all the feedbacks and suggestions are considered in planning the
parks
Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?
No it is not done based on consultation initially, all the technical aspects are considered by
engineers & the chair person
Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?
Bhadrak municipality prioritizes the parks/open spaces in an exclusive process as follows
1. Gap analysis based on the existing parks coverage
2. Initial prioritization based on the size and coverage of the park
3. Citizen consultation and enlightening them with the facts and ask their priorities
4. Finally considering all the above aspects the chairperson and counsellors prioritizes parks
for development
5. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based
on the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please
reply following questions (Word Limit: 100 Words)
Question: What are the sources of funds?
The funds are divided into three parts
1. Construction of parks 50% from AMRUT(GOI)
2. Construction of parks 50% from STATE GOVERNMENT
3. O&M cost by ULB 100%
Question: Has projects been converged with other program and scheme
No
Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?
YES the projects undertaken are prioritized based on “more with less” approach in such a way
that we spend less money and coverage is more

6. Conditionalities
1.1 Describe the Conditionality’s of each project in terms of availability of land,
environmental & social obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment,
approval and permission needed to implement the project. Required approvals will be
sought from competent authority and organizations. (Word Limit: 100 words)

Bhadrak municipality has identified few government lands in the municipal jurisdiction where
there is a need for parks but the land is under the state body which has to be transferred to the
municipality so that they can plan and execute the projects if provided funds on time by the state
& central government, and approval of DPR by the apex committee

7. Resilience
The resilience factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable, safe and secured
park development schemes. Ensure use of rust free sturdy steel structures for child and elderly
friendly features. (Word Limit: 100 words)
Plans are reviewed by the internal technical experts with regard to safety, security and universal
accessibility measures taken in the design and then finalize the plan for execution which makes
parks in Bhadrak safe and secure for all age groups. And the materials used considering there
sustainability in mind
8. Financial Plan

Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of
capital cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on the
investment requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for the
complete life cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 4,
6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders
(Centre, State and City) including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. While
preparing finance plan please reply following questions (Word Limit: 100 words)

 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating
infrastructure projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 List of individual project which is being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and
50% state grant.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence
and consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered
under other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been
planned for projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded
under AMRUT on 50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required.
However, consultation for involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the
objective of the mission.
  Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has
been categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to
contribute required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these
projects will be met from internal resources including collection of user charges. The
projects have been categorized based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as
required under AMRUT scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of both CAPEX and OPEX costs to ensure sustenance
throughout the life cycle of all projects identified in SLIP.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre,
State, ULBs and)?
Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes financial and physical convergence with various ongoing projects under
different schemes supported by both Central & State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 and 2.11. These tables
are based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

MASTERSERVICELEVELSIMPROVEMENTSDURINGMISSION PERIOD
(AsperTable2.2ofAMRUTguidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)
(Amount in Rs. Cr)

Sr. Physical Estimated

Project Name Existing After
No. Components Indicator Cost (Cr)
(As-Is) (To-be)
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near
Revenue Village, Baralpokhari - 0.39
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/01
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near
0.25
Garadapur - AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/02
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near to
salandi River - 0.44
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/03
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near to
Dakshineshwar Kali Mandhir - 0.47
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/04
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near
Mirzapur (Bidyadhar Adi Adi) - 0.4
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/05
ANNUAL FUND SHARING PATTERN FOR PARKS AND GREEN SPACE PROJECTS
(As per Table 2.3.1 of AMRUT guidelines)
(Amount in Rs. Cr)
Sr. Name of the Project Total Project
No. Cost (Cr) Total
GOI State ULB Others
(in Cr)
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near Revenue
1 0.39 0.20 0.20 0.39
Village, Baralpokhari - AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/01
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near Garadapur -
2 0.25 0.13 0.13 0.25
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/02
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near to salandi River
3 0.44 0.22 0.22 0.44
- AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/03
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near to
4 Dakshineshwar Kali Mandhir - 0.47 0.24 0.24 0.47
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/04
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near Mirzapur
5 0.4 0.20 0.20 0.4
(Bidyadhar Adi Adi) - AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/05

ANNUAL FUND SHARING BREAK_UP FOR PARKS and PLAY GROUND PROJECTS
(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT guidelines)
State ULB
Sr. Converg other
Project GOI 14th Other Tota 14th Other Tota Total
No ence s
Fc s l Fc s l

Construction of Park in
1 Bhadrak near Revenue
Village, Baralpokhari -
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/01 0.20 0.20 0.39
Construction of Park in
2 Bhadrak near Garadapur -
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/02 0.13 0.13 0.25

Construction of Park in
3 Bhadrak near to salandi
River -
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/03 0.22 0.22 0.44
Construction of Park in
Bhadrak near to
4 Dakshineshwar Kali
Mandhir -
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/04 0.24 0.24 0.47
Construction of Park in
5 Bhadrak near Mirzapur
(Bidyadhar Adi Adi) -
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/05 0.20 0.20 0.4
YEAR WISE PLAN FOR SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS
(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Annual targets (Increments form the baseline

value)
Project Indic Baseli
Proposed Project
Cost ator ne FY 2016
FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020
H1 H2

Construction of Park in Bhadrak near

Revenue Village, Baralpokhari - 0.39
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/01

Construction of Park in Bhadrak near

0.25
Garadapur - AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/02
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near to
0.44
salandi River - AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/03
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near to
Dakshineshwar Kali Mandhir - 0.47
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/04
Construction of Park in Bhadrak near
Mirzapur (Bidyadhar Adi Adi) - 0.4
AMRUT/OD/Bhadrak/PR/05

Annex-1: Indicative Assessment Tools for Parks (Indicative – ULBs can have its own assessment
tool as per the requirement or customize this tool to suit its need)