2015

Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP)

Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT)

CUTTACK
 Cuttack
As per the 2011 census, the population
of Cuttack Municipal Corporation is 6.10
Lakh. The decadal growth rate of the city
is @ 14%. The population of the out
growth area is about 0.53 Lakh. The
average floating population is about
15,000. Both horizontal and vertical
growth of the city is observed during the
recent years, however, the horizontal
growth is restricted by the rivers
Mahanadi and Kathajodi. Nearby towns
like Choudwar and Jagatpurare likely to
merge in the future to provide a regional
commercial hub. It was the old capital of
Odisha till the year 1956.Cuttack is a city
of heritage importance with history of
more than 1000 years! The city is well
connected by rail and road (NH 5).
Cuttack is famous in the country and
abroad for silver filigree works by its
artisans. Cuttack is the trading hub of the
state for which it is also known as the
commercial capital of the state. With
presence of the ‘maalgowdown’, economy of the city revolves around whole sale trading.

The city has skilled manpower in the field of tourism, hospitality and handicraft. The city has also immense
potential in food processing. Surrounded by rivers there is adequate availability of potable water in Cuttack
to match national benchmark. A major integrated sewerage and storm water drainage system project for the
entire city is implemented with JAICA funding. The municipal solid waste is managed on PPP mode
including landfill and treatment. Good public transport facility with city bus service on PPP mode is
available. MRTS is proposed to connect Cuttack, Bhubaneswar, Khurda and Jatni. Educational facility in the
city is good with presence of a major medical college cum hospital, private hospitals, nursing homes,
engineering colleges and ITI centers.

In the Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP) for Cuttack, sector-wise projects identified and the estimated
costs are: water supply- 43.nos./Rs. 382.00 Cr.; sewerage/septage- 4 nos./ Rs. 146.59 Cr.; storm water
drainage- 7 nos/ Rs. 421.75 Cr.; urban transport – 8 nos. / Rs. 43.00 Cr.; and parks – 29 nos./ Rs. 6.81 Cr.
In total 91 nos of projects have been identified with a total estimated cost of Rs. 1000.15 Crore.
Water Supply
 MissionManagementInformationSystem

1.AssesstheServiceLevelGap
The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Water Supply
(AMRUT Guidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existing institutional framework for the
sector. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. The zone wise data shall be used
in identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive at city level service gaps.
While assessing service level gap reply following questions not more than word
indicatedagainst each question

Question:What kind of baseline information is available for water supply system of the city?
Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sector. Is zone wise information
available? (75 words)
Ans.All the base line information for W/S system such as source, distribution network, storage
& service connection etc. is available. Ward wise detail data is available. Consumer and asset
database is maintained and updated annually. One project is ongoing under UIDSSMT for
surface source development.

Question:Haveyoucollectedcensus2011data?Areyouawareofbaselinesurvey
dataofMoUD?Haveyoucorrelateddatafromtheseandothersources?(75words)

Ans.The data regarding census 2011 has been collected. We havecorrelate the data with
other sources before preparing the proposal.

Question:What are existing service levels for water supply in the city? What is the coverage
of water supply Connections? What is per capita supply of water? How much is the extent of
metering? How much is non-revenue water? Provide information in table.

Ans.The existing service levels for water supply to Rourkela are given below in the prescribed
table.
Table:StatusofWaterSupplyservicelevels
TABLE 1.1 : Status of Water Supply Service
Sr.
Indicators Present status MOUD Benchmark Reliability Level
No.
1 Coverage of water supply connections 57.3% 100% B

2 Per capita supply of water 136 135 C

3 Extent of metering of water connections 0.05% 100% D

4 Extent of non-revenue water 55.7% 20% C

5 Quality of water supplied 100.0% 100% C

6 Cost recovery in water supply services 42.5% 100% C

Efficiency in collection of water supply
7 83.0% 90% B
related charges
Question: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed by
MoUD? (75 words)

Ans.The coverage has a gap of 42.7% for household level connectivity. Availability of water is
adequate. Consumer level metering is negligible which leads to a high NRW. The cost recovery
is low and has to be enhanced to 100%. Presently the city is drawing water from ground
source. A project is ongoing under UIDSSMT to develop the surface source.

SOURCEOFWATERANDWATERTREATMENTSYSTEM.

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.

Question: What is the existing source of water? Is it surface water source or under ground
water source? What is the capacity of these sources?

Ans.The existing source of water is ground.The total capacity of the surface source is 103.12
MLD. The ground source will be transited to surface source once the ongoing, Intake & WTP
are completed.

Question:Isthereanytreatmentprovidedtowaterfromthesesources?Howmuch
waterisrequiredtobetreateddaily?Whatisthetreatmentcapacityinstalledinthecity?
Ans.Yes, Disinfection process is adopted for all ground source

Question: What per capita water supply in LPCD (liter per capita per day) comes out,
if you divide total water supply by the total population?
Ans.136 LPCD is provided

DISTRIBUTIONZONES

Pleaseprovideinformationin150wordsontheaboverespondingto(howevernot
limitedto)following questions.

Question:CityIsdividedinhowmanyzonesforwatersupply?

Ans. City is divided into 15 Zones with 2 to 3 sub zones eackfor water supply purpose.

Question:ProvidedetailsoftotalnoofHouseholds(HH)ineachzone,noofHHwith
andwithoutwatertapconnectionsintheTable
Ans:-Detailed information given below.
Table:ZoneWiseCoverageofHouseholds
TABLE 1.2: Zone wise coverage of household
Zone Households with direct water Households without direct water
Total No of Households
No supply Connection supply connections
1 7414 3538 3876
2 7797 6992 805
3 11477 3683 7794
4 11526 4445 7081
5 12140 4915 7225
6 11995 7122 4873
7 8273 3011 5262
8 7457 4167 3290
9 8532 3326 5206
10 6572 3485 3087
11 4478 307 4171
12 8395 4270 4125
13 4095 597 3498
14 3450 220 3230
15 3219 92 3127
Total 116820 50170 66650

STORAGEOFWATER
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not
limited to) following questions.

Question: What is the total water storage capacity in the city? What is capacity of
elevated and ground water reservoirs?

Ans. Total water storage capacity including ongoing projects=5.93ML

ESR =2.1 ML
GSR=3.83ML

Question: In case of surface water, does city need to have ground level reservoirs to
store raw treated water?
Ans: There is no requirement to store raw water since the ongoing project will source water
from river Mahanadiwhich is perennial. However storage capacity for treated water is required.

Question: Is water being supplied to consumers through direct pumping or through

elevated reservoirs?
Ans. Both practice are adopted as of now.

Question: Is storage capacity sufficient to meet the cities demand?

Ans.No,the storage capacity is not sufficient to meet the city demand.
DISTRIBUTIONNETWORK

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not
limited to) following questions.

Question: What is the total length of water supply distribution pipe line laid in the city?
Ans. Total existing water supply distribution pipe line in the city is 551.09Km

Question: What is the total road length in the city? Is the pipe lines are laid in all
streets? Is the objective of universal coverage of water supply pipe line is achieved?
Ans. The city has 860.57 Km of road length.No, pipe lines are not laid in all streets for which
universal coverage could not be achieved

Question:Whatarethekindsofpipematerialsusedindistributionlines?
Ans. C.I, D.I., GI & UPVC

Question: Provide zone wise details of street length with and without water
distribution lines in the Table?

Table:ZoneWiselengthofdistributionnetwork
TABLE 1.3: Zone wise length of distribution network
Street length with water Street length without water
Zone No Total Street Length (Km)
distribution pipe line (Km) distribution pipe line (Km)
1 43.61 30.27 13.34
2 160.24 102.63 57.61
3 74.79 64.3 10.49
4 46.92 38.84 8.08
5 46.77 41.48 5.29
6 40.96 35.37 5.59
7 42.42 38.48 3.94
8 48.4 42.36 6.04
9 60.1 53.94 6.16
10 47.59 42.02 5.57
11 66.81 4.9 61.91
12 56.35 31.45 24.90
13 26.52 8.13 18.39
14 48.62 8.81 39.81
15 50.47 8.11 42.36
Total 860.57 551.09 309.48
INSTITUTIONALFRAMEWORK

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not
limited to) following questions.

Question: Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding,
service provision in table

Table:Functions,roles,andresponsibilitiesPlanningandDesign

TABLE 1.4a: Functions, roles, and responsibilities Planning and Design

Planning and Design Construction/ Implementation O&M
Project team headed by divisional EE of O & M team headed by EE of PHEO and
Planning and design Cell in EIC (PH) PHEO along with supervision field supported by operations engineers and
office headed by SE(P&D) and engineers (AEE/AE/JE) and supported operators. MoU will be signed between
supported by technical cell and by PMMU and PDMC. MoU will be PHEO and ULB for O & M of the
PDMC signed between PHEO and ULB for infrastructure. Outsourced PPP model will
execution of the project also be explored.

Question:Howcityisplanningtoexecuteprojects?
Ans. The city is planning to execute the ongoing and proposed project through a dedicated field
supervision team with hierarchical monitoring by PHEO.

Question: Shall the implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation or any

parastatal body? Please refer para 8.1 of AMRUT guidelines.
Ans. It will be implemented by PHEO, a wing of H&UD Department

2.BridgetheGap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives
undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed
to bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 &
6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from the
outcome of assessment and meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.

Question: List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to
address these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for
sector under different schemes with status and when the existing projects are
scheduled to be completed? Provide information in Table
Table: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned
TABLE 1.4b: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned projects

Cost Month of
Sl. No. Name of Project Scheme Name Status
(Cr. Rs.) Completion

Improvement of water supply to Cuttack Procurement

1 UIDSSMT 92.75 March 2019
(Surface source improvement) process initiated

Question: How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in
water supply system? Will completion of above will improve the coverage of network
and collection efficiency? If yes, how much. (100 words)

Ans. After completion of the above project the quality of water will improve and the source of
water will transit from ground source to surface source.

Question: Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services?
What kind of services will be required to fulfill the gap?

Ans.Yes. Additional infrastructures are required to address the demand of the city. Since the
corporation area spreads across the river, it required to have New WTP, feeder main, storage
and distribution to the bridge the gap and attain the benchmark levels.

Question: How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects
by changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to
focusing on optimum use of existing assets?

Ans.The service provided has in the past tried to optimally utilize the existing assets before
proposing new assets and will continue to adopt the same principle.

Question: Has city conducted assessment of Non-Revenue Water?if yes, what is

theNRW level? Is city planning to reduce NRW?

Ans. City has conducted assessment of Non-Revenue Water through indirect

methods which is approximately 55.50%. Yes the city has plans to reduce NRW by
way of introduction of HH level metering, reducing illegal connections and reducing
technical losses.

Question: Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned

projects, calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for water supply
pipe network, number of household to be provided with tap connections, and required
enhancement in capacity of water source/ treatment plant (MLD). Gaps in water
supply service levels be provided as per Table.
TABLE 1.5: Gaps in water supply service levels

2015 2021
Component
Ongoing
Present Total Demand Gap
projects

Source (MLD) -Surface Source 0 129 129 117 14

Treatment capacity (MLD) 0 129 129 117 14

Elevated Storage capacity (ML) 2.1 2.1 35 32.9

Distribution network coverage (m) 551090 551090 860570 309480

NOTE

The surface source development is proposed in the areas which are across the river and transportation of water from ongoing
WTP is not possible

OBJECTIVES
Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universal
coverage. While developing objectives following question shall be responded so as to
arrive at appropriate objective.
Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.
Question: Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome
ofassessment?
Each of the objective have been evolved from the outcome assessment. Which can
be listed as follows
1. Ensure quality to water
2. Universal household level access with adequate water
3. Reduce NRW thereby increase the coverage & cost recovery
4. Ensure equity within the zones

Question:Doeseachobjectivemeettheopportunitytobridgethegap?
Ans. Yes each of the objective meets the opportunity to bridge the gaps.

3.ExamineAlternativesandEstimateCost
The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to
address these gaps.. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines;
Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9). This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost
estimate with broad source of funding will be explored for each. While identifying the
possible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and its solutions including
status of completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please provide information
on the above responding to (however not limited to) following questions.
Question: What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the
objectives? (75 words)
Ans.UIDSSMT forensuring water quality from surface source
AMRUT for holistic approach to achieve universal coverage
Question: How can the activities be converged with other programme like JICA/ADB
funded projects in the city etc? (100words)
Ans.The program is being converged with UIDSSMT for source upgradation and RAY project
for water supply to slum area.

Question: What are the options of completing the ongoing activities? (75words)
Ans.Balance funding through state budgetary support

Question: How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learnt
during implementation of these projects? (75 words)
Ans.Availability of land is the major bottleneckwhich has been specifically addressed prior to
preparation of SLIP for the AMRUT projects. Technically feasible lands have been identified
and the concerned authorities have been moved for transfer of land.

Question: What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs? (100words)
Ans.Cost recovery is being proposed by increasing the consumer base and reducing the
operational cost.
Question: Will metering system for billing introduced?
Ans. Yes.
Question: Whether reduction in O&M cost by addressing NRW levels be applied? (75 words)
Ans.Yes, O & M cost will be reduced by reducing the NRW levels.
Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?
Ans.Yes

THE ATERNATIVE ACTIVITIES TO MEET THESE ACTIVITIES BE DEFINED AS

PER TABLE.

Table:AlternativeActivitiestoMeetObjectives

TABLE 1.6: Alternative Activities to Meet Objectives

Sr.
Objective Activities Financing Source
No.

1 Quality water supply Rehabilitation of venerable stretches AMRUT

2 Adequacy of water Treatment facility UIDSSMT,& AMRUT

3 Universal coverage Network expansion and house connection AMRUT

4 NRW reduction Consumer metering & leak reduction AMRUT

5 Cost recovery Coverage & NRW reduction

4.CitizenEngagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on the
suggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and
activities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize
these activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT Guidelines;
Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please explain followingquestions in not more than 200 words detailing out
the needs, aspirations and wishes of the local people.
Question: Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?
Ans. Yes
Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?
Ans. Yes.
Question: Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?
Ans. Yes.
Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?
Ans. The suggested alternatives quite acceptable to the stake holders
Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?
Ans. Yes, The alternatives taken up have been prioritized on the basis of consultation.
Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?
Ans.Cost benefit analysis

5. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based
on the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please
reply following questions in not more than 200 words.
Question: What are sources of funds?
Ans. AMRUT
Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?
Ans. Yes
Question: Has projects been prioritized based on more with less approach?
Ans. Yes
Question: Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for
prioritization of activities?
Ans. Yes
6.Conditionalities
Describe in not more than 300 words the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability
of land, environmental obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment,
approval and permission needed to implement the project.
Ans. Lands is available for the proposed infrastructures. Environmental clearances are not
required proposed project. Water for the 2 MLD WTP will be drawn from the existing intake
which already has a water drawal permission. Power availability has been discussed with
NESCO and agreed upon.
7.Resilience
Required approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience factor
would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable water supply scheme. Describe in not
more than 300 words regarding resilience built in the proposals.
Ans: The projects are environmentally sustainable and alsodisaster resilient.
 8.FinancialPlan
Total No of Projects identified is 43 nos with an estimated cost of Rs. 381.96 Cr. is required to
achieve universal coverage as envisaged under AMRUT. The completion period of this project
is planned by 2019-20. The water supply system is under parastatal agency i.e. Public Health
Engineering Organization (Urban). The ULB own generated fund is not able to cover the
operational requirements of ULB and has been depending upon the state grant for the same.
Therefore, all infrastructure development projects are required to be funded by Centre/ State
grants or loan funds by state agencies. Accordingly the present investment on the projects is
planned based on 50% fund as grant from Centre and 50% fund to be met by state grant and
some limited funds from ULB/ soft loans from financial agency like OUIDF. At the planning
stage, it is not possible to identify the breakup of funding pattern for state 50 % share of fund
and it is considered that this fund shall be made available from state resources. Based on the
above financial plan the specific responses to the questionnaires given in the template are as
under:
 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating infrastructure
projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULB
do not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.
 List of individual project which is being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50%
state grant. Soft loan from funding agencies will be explored which will form part of ULB
contribution. However, the state share will not be less than 20%.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence and
consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered under
other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned for
projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on
50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultation for
involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.
 Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has been
categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contribute
required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will be
met from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have been
categorized based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUT
scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of apart from infrastructure cost, the O&M requirement of
project life cycle. It will be possible to be sustained throughout the life cycle.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,
ULBs and)
Yes, the initial sharing of financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes various ongoing projects under different schemes supported by both Central &
State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 8.1.

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5.
These tables are based on Amrut guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.
TABLE 2.1: Master Plan of Water Supply Projects for Mission period
Year in which Year in which Estimated
Sr. Priority
Project Name & code to be proposed to Cost
No. number
implemented be completed (Cr. Rs.)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P1

1 1 15-16 16-17 2.92
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P2

2 2 15-16 16-17 3.62
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/02)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P3

3 3 15-16 16-17 3.46
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/03)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P4

4 4 15-16 16-17 3.60
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/04)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P5

5 5 15-16 16-17 3.61
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/05)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P6

6 6 15-16 16-17 3.58
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/06)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P7

7 7 15-16 16-17 3.59
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/07)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P8

8 8 15-16 16-17 3.68
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/08)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P9

9 9 15-16 16-17 3.53
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/9)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P10

10 10 15-16 16-17 3.33
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/10)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P11

11 11 15-16 16-17 3.86
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/11)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P12

12 12 15-16 16-17 37.63
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/12)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)

13 26 15-16 17-18 4.72
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)

14 27 16-17 18-19 9.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part

15 15 15-16 17-18 9.77
A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part B)

16 16 15-16 17-18 10.62
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/16)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part C)

17 17 16-17 18-19 8.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17)
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z3(Part A)
18 18 15-16 17-18 3.71
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/18)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z3(Part B)

19 19 16-17 18-19 14.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/19)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z4(Part A)

20 30 15-16 17-18 2.86
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/20)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z4(Part B)

21 31 16-17 18-19 15.78
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/21)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z5(Part A)

22 32 15-16 17-18 1.87
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/22)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z5(Part B)

23 33 16-17 18-19 16.60
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/23)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z6(Part A)

24 36 15-16 17-18 1.98
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/24)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z6(Part B)

25 37 16-17 18-19 15.28
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/25)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z7(Part A)

26 38 15-16 17-18 1.39
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/26)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z7(Part B)

27 39 16-17 18-19 12.07
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/27)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z8(Part A)

28 20 15-16 17-18 2.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/28)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z8(Part B)

29 21 16-17 18-19 9.16
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/29)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(Part A)

30 28 15-16 17-18 2.18
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/30)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(Part

31 29 16-17 18-19 12.36
B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z10(Part A)

32 22 15-16 17-18 1.97
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/32)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z10(Part B)

33 23 16-17 18-19 6.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/33)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11

34 14 15-16 17-18 29.57
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(Part A)

35 24 15-16 17-18 8.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/35)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(Part B)

36 25 16-17 18-19 9.64
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/36)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z13(Part A)

37 34 15-16 17-18 6.51
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/37)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z13(Part B)

38 35 16-17 18-19 6.80
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/38)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z14

39 42 17-18 19-20 20.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/39)
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z15
40 43 17-18 19-20 20.71
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/40)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P1

41 13 15-16 17-18 9.66
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P2

42 40 17-18 19-20 19.13
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/42)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P3

43 41 17-18 19-20 10.59
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/43)
TOTAL 382.00

TABLE 2.2: Master Service Level Improvement during Mission period

Change in Service Levels Estimated

Sr. Physical
Project Name & code Existing After Cost (Cr.
No. Component Indicator
(As-Is) (To-be) Rs.)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack - Rehabilitation P1 Replacement 100%,

1 Quality 100%, C 2.92
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack - Rehabilitation P2 Replacement 100%,

2 Quality 100%, C 3.62
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/02) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack - Rehabilitation P3 Replacement 100%,

3 Quality 100%, C 3.46
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/03) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack - Rehabilitation P4 Replacement 100%,

4 Quality 100%, C 3.60
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/04) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack - Rehabilitation P5 Replacement 100%,

5 Quality 100%, C 3.61
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/05) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P6 Replacement 100%,

6 Quality 100%, C 3.58
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/06) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P7 Replacement 100%,

7 Quality 100%, C 3.59
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/07) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P8 Replacement 100%,

8 Quality 100%, C 3.68
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/08) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P9 Replacement 100%,

9 Quality 100%, C 3.53
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/9) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P10 Replacement 100%,

10 Quality 100%, C 3.33
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/10) pipes A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P11 100%,

11 Testing lab Quality 100%, C 3.86
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/11) A

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P12

12 Metering Metering 0.05% 58.0% 37.63
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/12)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)

13 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 4.72
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)

14 Storage Coverage 100.0% 9.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part

15 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 9.77
A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15)
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part B)
16 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 10.62
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/16)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part C)

17 Storage Coverage 100.0% 8.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z3(Part A)

18 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 3.71
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/18)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z3(Part B)

19 Storage Coverage 100.0% 14.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/19)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z4(Part A)

20 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 2.86
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/20)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z4(Part B)

21 Storage Coverage 100.0% 15.78
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/21)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z5(Part A)

22 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 1.87
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/22)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z5(Part B)

23 Storage Coverage 100.0% 16.60
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/23)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z6(Part A)

24 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 1.98
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/24)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z6(Part B)

25 Storage Coverage 100.0% 15.28
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/25)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z7(Part A)

26 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 1.39
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/26)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z7(Part B)

27 Storage Coverage 100.0% 12.07
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/27)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z8(Part A)

28 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 2.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/28)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z8(Part B)

29 Storage Coverage 100.0% 9.16
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/29)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(Part A)

30 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 2.18
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/30)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(Part

31 Storage Coverage 100.0% 12.36
B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z10(Part A)

32 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 1.97
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/32)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z10(Part B)

33 Storage Coverage 100.0% 6.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/33)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11 Storage &

34 Coverage 100.0% 29.57
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34) Distribution

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(Part A)

35 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 8.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/35)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(Part B)

36 Storage Coverage 100.0% 9.64
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/36)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z13(Part A)

37 Distribution Coverage 100.0% 6.51
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/37)
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z13(Part B)
38 Storage Coverage 100.0% 6.80
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/38)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z14 Storage &

39 Coverage 100.0% 20.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/39) Distribution

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z15 Storage &

40 Coverage 100.0% 20.71
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/40) Distribution
Surface
Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P1
41 Source Adequacy 0.0% 135 9.66
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41)
Improvement
Surface
Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P2
42 Source Adequacy 0.0% 135 19.13
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/42)
Improvement
Surface
Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P3
43 Source Adequacy 0.0% 135 10.59
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/43)
Improvement

TABLE 2.3.1a:Total Fund Sharing Pattern for water supply projects during mission period
Total Project Share (Amount in Cr. Rs.)
Sr.
Name of Project & code Cost
No.
(Cr. Rs.) GOI State ULB Others Total
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P1
1 2.92 1.46 1.46 2.92
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P2

2 3.62 1.81 1.81 3.62
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/02)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P3

3 3.46 1.73 1.73 3.46
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/03)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P4

4 3.60 1.80 1.80 3.60
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/04)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P5

5 3.61 1.81 1.81 3.61
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/05)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P6

6 3.58 1.79 1.79 3.58
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/06)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P7

7 3.59 1.80 1.80 3.59
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/07)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P8

8 3.68 1.84 1.84 3.68
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/08)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P9

9 3.53 1.77 1.77 3.53
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/9)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P10

10 3.33 1.66 1.66 3.33
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/10)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P11

11 3.86 1.93 1.93 3.86
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/11)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P12

12 37.63 18.81 18.81 37.63
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/12)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)

13 4.72 2.36 2.36 4.72
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13)
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)
14 9.79 4.90 4.90 9.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part

15 9.77 4.89 4.89 9.77
A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part B)

16 10.62 5.31 5.31 10.62
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/16)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part C)

17 8.14 4.07 4.07 8.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z3(Part A)

18 3.71 1.86 1.86 3.71
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/18)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z3(Part B)

19 14.81 7.40 7.40 14.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/19)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z4(Part A)

20 2.86 1.43 1.43 2.86
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/20)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z4(Part B)

21 15.78 7.89 7.89 15.78
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/21)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z5(Part A)

22 1.87 0.94 0.94 1.87
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/22)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z5(Part B)

23 16.60 8.30 8.30 16.60
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/23)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z6(Part A)

24 1.98 0.99 0.99 1.98
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/24)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z6(Part B)

25 15.28 7.64 7.64 15.28
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/25)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z7(Part A)

26 1.39 0.70 0.70 1.39
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/26)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z7(Part B)

27 12.07 6.04 6.04 12.07
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/27)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z8(Part A)

28 2.14 1.07 1.07 2.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/28)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z8(Part B)

29 9.16 4.58 4.58 9.16
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/29)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(Part A)

30 2.18 1.09 1.09 2.18
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/30)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(Part

31 12.36 6.18 6.18 12.36
B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z10(Part A)

32 1.97 0.99 0.99 1.97
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/32)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z10(Part B)

33 6.79 3.40 3.40 6.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/33)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11

34 29.57 14.79 14.79 29.57
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(Part A)

35 8.81 4.41 4.41 8.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/35)
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(Part B)
36 9.64 4.82 4.82 9.64
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/36)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z13(Part A)

37 6.51 3.26 3.26 6.51
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/37)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z13(Part B)

38 6.80 3.40 3.40 6.80
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/38)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z14

39 20.14 10.07 10.07 20.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/39)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z15

40 20.71 10.36 10.36 20.71
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/40)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P1

41 9.66 4.83 4.83 9.66
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P2

42 19.13 9.57 9.57 19.13
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/42)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Head works P3

43 10.59 5.29 5.29 10.59
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/43)
Total 382.00 191.00 191.00 - - 382.00

TABLE 2.3.1b: Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for water supply projects

Sr. Total Project Share (Amount in Cr. Rs.)

Name of Project & code
No. Cost (Cr. Rs.)
GOI State ULB Others Total
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P1
1 2.92
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01) 0.73 0.73 1.46

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P2

2 3.62
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/02) 0.91 0.91 1.81

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P3

3 3.46
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/03) 0.86 0.86 1.73

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P4

4 3.60
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/04) 0.90 0.90 1.80

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P5

5 3.61
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/05) 0.90 0.90 1.81

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P6

6 3.58
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/06) 0.90 0.90 1.79

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P7

7 3.59
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/07) 0.90 0.90 1.80

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P8

8 3.68
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/08) 0.92 0.92 1.84

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P9

9 3.53
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/9) 0.88 0.88 1.77

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P10

10 3.33
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/10) 0.83 0.83 1.66

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P11

11 3.86
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/11) 0.97 0.97 1.93
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -Rehabilitation P12
12 37.63 9.41 9.41 18.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/12)

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part A)

13 4.72
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z1(Part B)

14 9.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part

15 9.77
A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part B)

16 10.62
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/16) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z2(Part C)

17 8.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z3(Part A)

18 3.71
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/18) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z3(Part B)

19 14.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/19) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z4(Part A)

20 2.86
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/20) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z4(Part B)

21 15.78
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/21) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z5(Part A)

22 1.87
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/22) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z5(Part B)

23 16.60
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/23) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z6(Part A)

24 1.98
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/24) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z6(Part B)

25 15.28
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/25) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z7(Part A)

26 1.39
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/26) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z7(Part B)

27 12.07
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/27) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z8(Part A)

28 2.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/28) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z8(Part B)

29 9.16
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/29) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(Part A)

30 2.18
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/30) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z9(Part

31 12.36
B)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z10(Part A)

32 1.97
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/32) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z10(Part B)

33 6.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/33) - - -
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z11
34 29.57
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(Part A)

35 8.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/35) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z12(Part B)

36 9.64
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/36) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z13(Part A)

37 6.51
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/37) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z13(Part B)

38 6.80
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/38) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z14

39 20.14
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/39) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack -New Z15

40 20.71
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/40) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Headworks P1

41 9.66
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Headworks P2

42 19.13
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/42) - - -

Improvement of WS to Cuttack – Headworks P3

43 10.59
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/43) - - -

Total 382.00 -
19.11 19.11 - 38.21

TABLE 2.3.2: Annual Fund Sharing break up for water

supply project All Amount in Crores of Rs.
State ULB
Sr. Tota
Project Name & code GoI 14th Other 14th Othe Tot Convergence Othe
No. Total l
s rs al rs
FC FC
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
1 Rehabilitation P1 0.7
0.73 0.73 1.46
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/01) 3
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
2 Rehabilitation P2 0.9
0.91 0.91 1.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/02) 1
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
3 Rehabilitation P3 0.8
0.86 0.86 1.73
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/03) 6
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
4 Rehabilitation P4 0.9
0.90 0.90 1.80
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/04) 0
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
5 Rehabilitation P5 0.9
0.90 0.90 1.81
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/05) 0
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
6 Rehabilitation P6 0.9
0.90 0.90 1.79
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/06) 0
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
7 Rehabilitation P7 0.9
0.90 0.90 1.80
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/07) 0
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
8 Rehabilitation P8 0.9
0.92 0.92 1.84
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/08) 2
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
9 Rehabilitation P9 0.8
0.88 0.88 1.77
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/9) 8
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
10 Rehabilitation P10 0.8
0.83 0.83 1.66
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/10) 3
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
11 Rehabilitation P11 0.9
0.97 0.97 1.93
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/11) 7
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
12 Rehabilitation P12 9.4 18.8
9.41 9.41
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/12) 1 1
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
13 New Z1(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/13)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
14 New Z1(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/14)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
15 New Z2(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/15)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
16 New Z2(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/16)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
17 New Z2(Part
- - - -
C)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/17)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
18 New Z3(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/18)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
19 New Z3(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/19)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
20 New Z4(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/20)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
21 New Z4(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/21)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
22 New Z5(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/22)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
23 New Z5(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/23)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
24 New Z6(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/24)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
25 New Z6(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/25)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
26 New Z7(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/26)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
27 New Z7(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/27)
 Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
28 New Z8(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/28)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
29 New Z8(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/29)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
30 New Z9(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/30)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
31 New Z9(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/31)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
32 New Z10(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/32)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
33 New Z10(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/33)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
34 New Z11
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/34)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
35 New Z12(Part
- - - -
A)(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/35)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
36 New Z12(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/36)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
37 New Z13(Part A)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/37)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
38 New Z13(Part B)
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/38)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
39 New
- - - -
Z14(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/39)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
40 New
- - - -
Z15(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/40)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
41 Headworks P1
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/41)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
42 Headworks P2
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/42)
Improvement of WS to Cuttack -
43 Headworks P3
- - - -
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/WS/43)

Total 19.11 19.11 19.1 - 38.2

- - - - -
1 1
TABLE 2.5: Year wise Plan for Service Level Improvement
Annual Targets
Project (Increment from the Baseline Value)
Proposed
Cost in Indicator Baseline
Project FY 2016 FY FY FY FY
Cr. Rs.
H1 H2 2017 2018 2019 2020
Ongoing
under
92.75
UIDSSMT
Proposed
under 382.00
AMRUT
Coverage of water
57.3% 58% 60% 65% 70% 90% 100%
supply connections
Per capita supply of
136 135 135 135 135 135 135
water
Extent of metering of
0.05% 1% 3% 20% 50% 90% 100%
water connections
Extent of non-revenue
55.7% 55% 52% 40% 30% 22% 20%
water
Quality of water supplied 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost recovery in water
42.5% 45% 50% 60% 80% 90% 100%
supply services
Efficiency in collection of
water supply related 83.0% 85% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
charges
Storm Water Drainage
 Mission Management Information System
I. Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is toassess the existing situation and servicelevels gaps for Storm
WaterDrainage(AMRUTGuidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existing institutional
frameworkfor the sector. AMRUT isfocused on improvement inservicelevels.The zone wise
data shall be used in identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gapswill be added to arrive atcity
level servicegaps.Whileassessing servicelevel gapreplyfollowing questions notmore thanword
indicated against each question.

1.2. Whatkindofbaselineinformation is available for storm water drainage system of

the city? Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc. related to sector. Is
zone wise information available? (75 words)
 DPR prepared by OWSSB by M/s STC Consortium in 2008
 DPR prepared by OISIP, JICA by M/s TEC Consortium in 2011
 CDP by ASCI 2008
 Comprehensive Development Plan ( Master Plan) by IIT Kharagpur in 2011
 City Sanitation Plan by PRUDA & AIIlSG in 2012
1.2.Haveyou collecteddata fromcensusothersources?Are you aware of baseline survey
data of MoUD?Have you correlated data from these andothersources?(75 words)

Yes, collected data from

a. District Census Office
b. Indian Meteorological Centre (IMC) Bhubaneswar
c. Water Resource Department, Orissa
d. Survey of India
e. District statistical office, Cuttack.
f. Director survey and maps Orissa Cuttack

1.3 What is existing service levels for storm water drainage in the city? What is the
coverage of drains? What are the no ofincidence of sewerage mixing in the drains? How
many times water logging incidence happens in the city? Provide comparative
information of service levels (in tabulated form) with respect to the service level bench
marks prescribed by MoUD and sustainable standards for service levels under the
National Mission on Sustainable Habitat (NMSH) in table 1.1
 Red
Sustainable Black (Caution for
Sr. No. Indicators (Immediate action Present Status
standards improvement)
for improvement)
Coverage of Storm water
1 100% <75% <50% < 75 %
drainage network
Incidence of sewerage mixing
2 0% <25% <50% < 50%
in the drains1
Incidence of water logging2 (in
3 0 <25 <50 < 50
nos. per year)
Table 1.1: Status of Storm Water Level service levels

1.4: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarksprescribed
byMoUDandsustainablestandardsfor servicelevels under theNationalMission onSustainable
Habitat (NMSH)?(75 words)

a. Total length of road network in the ULB – 860.57 Km

b. Total length of primary,secondary and tertiary drains - 482.11 Km

Coverage of storm water Drainage networks - Coverage = [(b/a)*100] = 56 %

Gap of 44 % with regards to benchmarks prescribed by MoUD

1.5 What are major challenge facing the city in regard to achieving these service level
benchmarks?
The major environmental and public health problems in Cuttack are due to:
1) Storm drains which are used as sewage collection facilities.
2) Inadequate hydraulic capacity of existing drains & absence of proper drainage network.
3) Stagnation & flooding in some low lying pockets.
4) Inadequate capacity of existing Main Pumps & some sluices.
5) Absence of systematic solid waste collection and open dumping without leachate treatment
and soil cover, resulting in choking of drains and groundwater contamination,
6) Lack of financial resources and human capacity in institutions responsible for sewerage,
drainage and solid waste management.

1.6: Identify gaps in capacity in managing the services efficiently and also provide an
innovative solution for efficiently managing these services.
Maintenance of the Storm Water Drain (SWD) is done as in when required. Regular scheduled
maintenance of the SWD is required with necessary staff strength.

1.7: Brief the ongoing drainage projects in the city. The components included in these
projects, how and up to what extent it will support to the drainage system of the city.
Weather it address all the issues related to drainage?
 Rehabilitation and Construction of Drainage Facilities of Main Drain – 16.7 Km, Sub Drain – 7
Km is going on by OISIP, JICA.
 No. It will not address all the issues related to drainage.

1
Incidence of sewerage mixing in the drains areratio of no of households discharging wastewater directly into the drains to the total no of
households.
2
No of times water logging is reported in a year, at flood prone points in the city
2.0 Coverage of drains **
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to) following
questions.

2.1:Describe how at present, the storm water of City is drained off? How many natural and
manmade drains are exists and their coverage with respect to road network?
 Main Drain - 22 Km
 Branch Drain - 29 Km
 Major Surface Drain 130.34 Km
 Surface Drains 300.77km
TOTAL 482.11 Km
Coverage of storm water Drainage networks – 56 %

2.2 What is the capacity and condition of these drains? Is sufficient to carry the peak flow of
the catchment/water shed?

 Drains get silted up frequently due to insufficiency in channels hydraulics.

 Constriction in the water way and carrying capacity of the drains, further gets aggravated as
silting results in growth of weeds, shrubs, water hyacinth etc.
 Some portions of drains have been narrowed by encroachments and widening of adjacent
roads.
 Constructions have occurred at many reaches of drains due to construction of Pucca
houses. At many places restrictions exist on both banks leaving no space for periodic
cleaning, maintenance and repair.
 Crossing overs by Hume pipe culverts, foot bridges, low level bridges and (crossing of)
water supply pipelines cause severe obstruction to flow.
 Clogging of drains gets aggravated due to uncontrolled intrusion of utility services like
Electricity, Telephone Poles etc.
 Many areas lack drainage channels. These result in prolonged drainage congestion and
localized flooding.
 Un-civic practice like throwing garbage into drains is rampart and there is neither safe
guard nor civic awareness.
 Most tributary drains are with less than adequate capacity and the water way provided in
general has little relation to their drainage areas.
 Roads are often at a lower elevation than drain full flow level causing reverse flow of drain
water on to the roads.
 At several reaches slums have developed by the side of drains and encroachment over
right of way of existing drainage channels. Many of the slum areas inside the city are not
provided with drains of any sort.
 2.3 Does city have separate storm water drainage network? If no, provide the information
regarding locations of gray water mixes with the existing drains in table 1.2. In case of
mixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?

S.No. Sewer Zone/ Ward No Location Merging with which sewer

Old Cuttack Zone ( Core City )
1 Chahata to Matagajpur Main Drain
( Ward 7 to 47 and 50 to 55)
Abhinaba Cuttack, CDA,
2 Bidanasi ( Ward 1 to 6) River Kathajodi
Bidyadharpur
3 Nimpur, Jagatpur ( Ward 48 & 49) Jagatpur Area River Mohanadi& Canal
4 Gopalpur, Balikuda ( Ward 56,57,58 & 59) Phulnakhara to Balikuda River Kathajodi& Canal
Table 1.2: Detail of Locations where storm water get mixed with sewer

2.4 In case of mixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?

 During the rainy season the drains tends to overflow. Further there are several artificial
flooding created within the city which creates an Unhygienic condition in the city.
 Most of the Drains have earthen bottoms and hence cleaning becomesdifficult as the
original bed level cannot be identified and ascertained.
 The storm water is mixed with sewage and garbage which createsunacceptable aesthetics
conditions and public health concerns.

3.0 Water Logging

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to) following
questions.
3.1 Presently how the problem of water logging is handled? Is it provides the satisfactory
outcome?
 At the time of exigencies, 275 Nos ( Total 2803 HP )of moveable pumps of are to be
deployed at identified points for pumping water from M.S.W.C.s, B.S.W.C.s and low laying
pockets where draining out of the storm water is feasible.
 No it is not provide satisfactory outcome.

3.2 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus on
Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH or
more) in the Table 1.2.
No of times water logging
reported in a year ( stagnant
S.No. Area Ward no. No of points
water for more than four hours of
a depth more than 6” )
1. Idga&DhobaSahi Stand Post
7

2. BilaSahi, Shree Vihar Colony

9
Key road 3. Stewart Patna
1 intersection 30 to 40
4. SishuBhawan
9

5. BudhiThakurani Lane
11
 6. S.C.B. Medical Campus

13
7. S.C.B. Medical & Direct of
34 Fishery

8. RahemanChhak
9. Arunodaya Nagar
35 10. SidheswarSahi
11. Chahatachhak
41

45
10
01
31 1. Radhanath Rath B.K. Road-I

2. Bikram Lodge, ThoriaSahi

31

3. Ranihat High School Campus

34
4. Chhatra Bazar High School

36
5. Roxy lane
36

Along roads 6. Railway settlement House

( 50 mt
2 38 30 to 40
length or
more) 7. Gurukhetra, Sikharpur

46
8. KamalakantaVidyaPitha

46

9. SikharpurTalaSahi
46

51 10. Gosala Lane

55
13 11. C.R.R.I. Campus
14 12. Mahidas Bazar
13. Mehendipur
 1 1.BidanasiKumbharSahi (TariniVihar)

1 2.Bai Mundi Nursing Home

7 3.Uppar Police Colony

1 4. Krushak Bazar

3 5. Immampada

7 6. Sundei, Deula Sahi

7 7. Dhoba Sahi, Raghunath Jew

7 8. Sivajee Nagar Stand Post – I

9. Bangali Sahi Prajapita Primary

8 School

10. HatuaSahi Stand Post – I

8

Locality 11. HatuaSahiGada

8
3 (affecting 50 30 to 40
HH or more) 12. In front of Akhandalamani
8 Mandira

13. Wireless Stand Post –I

8

14. Chahata Nagar Stand Post

8
15. Matha Sahi, Tulasipur Stand
Post – 1
8
16. Satadivihar Stand Post – I

17. Godhuli lane

8

18. SriviharColoney
9

9 19. Ramgarh

20. Kafla Pokhari (Saitan

10 Bagicha)

10 21. Reba Bagicha

10 22. High Court Campus

11 23. Hadagadia

11 24. DarjiSahi (DhrubaMandir)

13 25. Kali Gali

26. State Co-operative Bank Field

13

13 27. Amala Club

28. Habib Pokhari

14
29. Jagannath Ballav, Kasi Jena
14 House

14 30. Justice B.P. Das Residence

31. Durga Nursing Home

15
32. GobarGadia
15
33. Dear Park
15
34. Gorakabar
15

35. ChunabhatiGali
15

36. ChamaraSahi
18

37. Chandan Pokhari

18

38. MakarbaSahi
21
39. Near ManikBabu Res
22

40. Dhobi Lane

22

41. Hong Kong Hotel Lane

22

42. Gamamiya Gali

22

43. Vidya Bhawan

23
44. Samanta Sahi Pokhari
24
 45. Brundaban Gada Samanta
24
Sahi

46. Dillip Mulia Lane

24

47. Haripur Pond

24

24 48. Rausapatna Pokhari

24 49. Tara Atta Kala

50. New Rausapatna

27
51. New Rausapatna Near B.
27 Mohanty Res.

27 52. Near Silu Pradhan Residence

53. Buxi Pokhari, Badhei Sahi

27
54. Badhei Sahi, Buxi Bazar

25 55. Deepa Sahoo Lane, Buxi

Bazar

56. KhumbharSahi
25

25 57. Kathagada Sahi Kumbhar

Sahi

58. Harizan Sahi

26

59. Mangu Rout Lane

26

60. Hazari Lane

26
61. Jhanjirimangala Harijan Sahi
26 (Mihir Mallick)

28 62. Lunia Sahi, Harijana Sahi

63. Kuni Babu Res.

29 Jhanjirimangala

64. Dharma Dutta Pokhari

29
65. Pithapur Telusu Basti

29
66. Bhagatpur

29
 67. Amiya Mohanty Lane,
BamphiSahi
29

30
68. Pratap Mishra Lane,
Rajabagicha
30

69. Pratap Mohanty Res.

30

70. Rajabagicha Police Colony - I

30 71. Dr. Amarendra Mishra Res.

30 72. Mali Sahi

31 73. Biswal Lane

31 74. Ranihat Harijana Sahi

31 75. Khuntia Lane

31 76. Thoria Sahi Nayak Sahi

31 77. Naik Sahi

31 78. Ghasia Sahi

31 79. Mini Namuna Lane

31 80. Mangala Temple

81. Mini Namuna Lane

36

82. Plaza Colony

36

36 83. Bisinabar Harijana Sahi

36 84. Paniapada

37
85. ParidaSahi

37

86. Nila Bila Dhia Sahi

37
37
87. Matru Bhawan Stand Post – I

37

88. Near P.H Colony Chhatra

Bazar – I
37

89. Pareswar Sahi Temple

39
90. Nigamananda Matha

91. Palamandap, Jobra (Nadikula

Sahi)
40
92. Suna Babu Gali

40
93. Suna Babu Gali (Back Side)
40
94. Jobra Charigharia Sahi

40
95. Jobra Majhi Sahi (Ajay Behera
Res)
40

96. Majhi Sahi, Jobra

41

41

41 97. Jobra Stand Post -I

98. Mallhasahi -I

41

99. TalaSahi

41
 100. Tinapita Sahi, Jobra
41

101. Near Manmohan Sahu House

42
102. Dhobi Sahi U.P. School

42
103. Rasmita Sahoo Lane

42 104. Kandoi House

42 105. Maniraj Biscuit Company

42 106. Maitri Vihar

43 107. Kaibalya Vihar

108. Ananda Vihar

43

109. Vikash Bhawan

43

44 110. Shyam Sundar Matha

44 111. Ambika Maa Mandir

44 112. Khannagar Crematorium

44 113. Khannagar

45 114. Gauda Sahi, Khannagar

45 115. P.C. Sarkar Lane

45

116. Surya Vihar

45
117. Khannagar Nua Sahi

45 118. Nua Sahi

45
 119. Dula Dei Temple

46
120. Korapokhari

46
121. Kaliboda

46
122. Nadikula Sahi

46
123. Dinagadia

46
124. Fakirpur, Mallhasahi

48
125. Bhubanpur

48
126. Paga Sahi, Sikariapur

48
127. Laxmanpur

48
128. Fakirpur

48
129. Nimpur Kela Sahi

49

49 130. Nimpur Munda Sahi

49

131. Immampara Samal Sahi

132. Kunjabihari Lane

50
133. Press Colony Khapuria Stand
50 Post

51 134. Mattagajpur

135. Bali Sahi

51
136. Poporada
51
137. Tinigharia Nua Sahi
51
138. Sartol Village
51
139. Netaji Nagar
 140. Tinigharia Nua Sahi
51

141. Tinigharia
51

142. Rajendra Nagar(Sradha

51 Nursingh Home)

143. Kazidhia
52

144. Sriram Nagar

52

145. Nirankari Ashram

52
146. E.S.I Hospital lane

52
147. Kalyan Nagar
52
148. Andarpur
53
149. Darghapatna New Colony
53
150. Baya Baba Matha
53
151. Red Cross Field
53
152. A.G. Colony

53
153. Zero Point (1 No.)
54
154. Nua Bazar
54
155. Pothapokhari
54
156. Nehrupalli
54
157. Gandhipalli
54
158. Debendra Nagar
54
159. Bidyadharpur
55
160. Bhadimula
55
161. Gopalpur NuaSahi
55
 56 162. Gopalpur

56 163. Gopalpur Bhadei Sahi– I

56 164. Subhadrapur

56 165. Rajnagar Patna

166. Kazi Patna

56

56 167. Bhanpur

57 168. Pira Bazar

57 169. Gopalpur Behera Sahi – I

57 170. Srikaruan

57 171. Shiva Mandir

57 172. Pratap NagarI

58 173. Ram Nagar

58 174. Kacharamala New

59 175. Kacharamala

59

59

TOTAL 199
Table 1.2: Flood prone points in the city
4.0 Chocking of drains
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to) following
questions.
4.1 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus on
Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH or
more) in the Table 1.2.

Stretch
Length
S. No. Sewer Zone/Ward No Location
Affected (in
mtrs)

1 1 1. Bidanasi Kumbhar Sahi (Tarini 100

Vihar)

1 2. Bai Mundi Nursing Home 120

7 3. Uppar Police Colony

110
1 4. Krushak Bazar
90
3 5. Immampada

7 6. Sundei, DeulaSahi
80
7 7. Dhoba Sahi, Raghunath Jew
150
7
8. Sivajee Nagar Stand Post – I 150
8 9. Bangali Sahi Prajapita Primary
School

8 10. HatuaSahi Stand Post – I

120
11. Hatua Sahi Gada
8
12. In front of Akhandalamani
130
Mandira
8
13. Wireless Stand Post –I
160
14. Chahata Nagar Stand Post

15. Matha Sahi, Tulasipur Stand

8 Post – 1 160

16. Satadi vihar Stand Post – I

8 200
8 17. Godhuli lane

180
18. Srivihar Coloney

8 19. Ramgarh

20. Kafla Pokhari (Saitan

120
Bagicha)
9
21. Reba Bagicha 140

22. High Court Campus

9
23. Hadagadia
10
24. Darji Sahi (Dhruba Mandir) 180
10
25. Kali Gali

10 26. State Co-operative Bank

Field 150

11 27. Amala Club

180
28. Habib Pokhari

11 29. Jagannath Ballav, Kasi Jena 160

House

30. Justice B.P. Das Residence 120

13

31. Durga Nursing Home

80
13 32. Gobar Gadia

33. Dear Park

13 90

34. Gorakabar

35. Chunabhati Gali 200

14
36. Chamara Sahi
100
14 37. Chandan Pokhari

38. Makarba Sahi

14 120
 39. Near Manik Babu Res

150
15 40. Dhobi Lane

41. Hong Kong Hotel Lane

15 42. Gamamiya Gali 160

43. Vidya Bhawan

120
15
44. Samanta Sahi Pokhari

45. Brundaban Gada 140

15
SamantaSahi

15
46. Dillip Mulia Lane
160
18
47. Haripur Pond

18
48. Rausapatna Pokhari

180
49. Tara Atta Kala

21
50. New Rausapatna

22
51. New Rausapatna Near B.
Mohanty Res.
22 110
52. Near Silu Pradhan
Residence
22 80
53. Buxi Pokhari, Badhei Sahi
22
54. Badhei Sahi, Buxi Bazar 90

55. DeepaSahoo Lane, Buxi

Bazar 90
23

56. KhumbharSahi
24
120
57. KathagadaSahiKumbharSahi
24
58. Harizan Sahi 150

59. Mangu Rout Lane

24 140
60. Hazari Lane
 160
61. Jhanjirimangala Harijan Sahi
(Mihir Mallick)

24
180
62. Lunia Sahi, Harijana Sahi
24
63. Kuni Babu Res.
Jhanjirimangala
24
190
64. Dharma Dutta Pokhari

65. Pithapur Telusu Basti

27 120

66. Bhagatpur
27

67. Amiya Mohanty Lane, 110

27 BamphiSahi

110
68. Pratap Mishra Lane,
27 Rajabagicha
140

69. Pratap Mohanty Res.

25
70. Rajabagicha Police Colony -
I 170

71. Dr. Amarendra Mishra Res.

25

72. Mali Sahi 160

25 73. Biswal Lane 180

74. Ranihat Harijana Sahi

190
26 75. Khuntia Lane

76. Thoria Sahi Nayak Sahi

26

77. Naik Sahi 100

26 78. Ghasia Sahi 120

26 79. Mini Namuna Lane

110
80. Mangala Temple
28

81. Mini Namuna Lane

90
82. Jitu Mulia residence
Mahatab road
29
83. Plaza Colony
80

84. Bisinabar Harijana Sahi

85. Paniapada 150

29

86. Parida Sahi

29 150
87. Nila Bila Dhia Sahi

29 120

88. Matru Bhawan Stand Post –

I
130

29
89. Near P.H Colony Chhatra 160
Bazar – I
30
160

90. Pareswar Sahi Temple

30
91. Nigamananda Matha 200

92. Palamandap, Jobra

(NadikulaSahi)
30
93. SunaBabuGali
180
94. SunaBabuGali (Back Side)

30 95. Jobra Charigharia Sahi

96. Jobra Majhi Sahi (Ajay 120

Behera Res)

30
140
31

97. Majhi Sahi, Jobra

180

31 98. Jobra Stand Post 150

31

180
31
99. Mallha sahi

31
160

31
100. Tala Sahi

120
31

101. Tinapita Sahi, Jobra

31
80
102. Near Manmohan Shau
House
36
103. Dhobi Sahi U.P. Schoo 90

104. Rasmita Sahoo Lane

36
105. Kandoi House 200
36
106. Maniraj Biscuit Company
100

36 107. Maitri Vihar

108. Kaibalya Vihar 120

37
109. Ananda Vihar
150
37 110. Vikash Bhawan
 160
111. Shyam Sundar Matha

37 112. Ambika Maa Mandir

120
113. Khannagar Crematorium
140
37 114. Khannagar

115. GaudaSahi, Khannagar

37 160

116. P.C. Sarkar Lane

37 180
117. Surya Vihar

118. Khannagar Nua Sahi

110

119. Nua Sahi

39 120. Dula Dei Temple 140

121. Korapokhari
80
122. Kaliboda
40
123. Nadikula Sahi
90

124. Dinagadia
40
125. Fakirpur, Mallhasahi 90

126. Bhubanpur
40
120
127. PagaSahi, Sikariapur

128. Laxmanpur
40
129. Fakirpur 150

130. Nimpur Kela Sahi

40

140
 131. Nimpur Munda Sahi

41

132. Immampara Samal Sahi 160

41
133. Kunjabihari Lane

134. Press Colony Khapuria

Stand Post
41 180
135. Mattagajpur

136. Bali Sahi

137. Poporada 190

41 138. Tinigharia Nua Sahi

120
139. Sartol Village

140. Netaji Nagar

141. Tinigharia Nua Sahi

110
41
142. Tinigharia
110
143. Rajendra Nagar(Sradha
Nursingh Home)

144. Kazidhia
41
145. Sriram Nagar
140

146. Nirankari Ashram

147. E.S.I Hospital lane

170
42 148. Kalyan Nagar

149. Andarpur
160

150. Darghapatna New Colony

42
 151. Baya Baba Matha

42 152. Red Cross Field

153. A.G. Colony 180

42 154. Zero Point (1 No.)

155. Nua Bazar

42
156. Pothapokhari
43
157. Nehrupalli 190

43 158. Gandhipalli

159. Debendra Nagar

43
160. Bidyadharpur
100
44
161. Bhadimula

44 162. Gopalpur Nua Sahi

120
163. Gopalpur
44

164. Gopalpur Bhadei Sahi– I

165. Subhadrapur
44

166. Rajnagar Patna 110

45 167. Kazi Patna

90
168. Bhanpur

45 169. Pira Bazar

80
170. Gopalpur Behera Sahi – I
45

171. Srikaruan
150
172. Shiva Mandir

45 150
 173. Pratap NagarI

174. Ram Nagar

120
45
175. Kacharamala New
130
45 176. Kacharamala

160

46
160

46

46 200

46

180
46

48

48 120

48
140

48
180

48

49 150

49

180
49

160
50 120

80
50

90
51

200
51

100

51 120

150
51

51

51 160

51 120

51

140
52

160
52

180

52

52 110

52

53
 80

53

90
53

90
53

53
120

54

54 150

140
54

160
54

54
180

54

55 190

55
120
55

56
110

56
110
56

56 140

170

56
160
 180
56

57
190
57

57 100
120

57

110

57
90
58
80

58

150
59

150
59

120
59

130

160

160
200

180

120
 140

180

150

180

160

120

80

90

200

100

120

150

160

120

140

Table 1.2:
Detail of Locations prone to chocking of drains due to solid waste

4.2 How presently the problem is addressed?

City Health Officer (CHO), CMC remain full in charge of control room of Health Section, Cleaning
of chock/blockage of drain during heavy rain, cleaning of all drain etc. for free flow of storm
water. All health wing personnel namely Sanitary Inspectors, Jamadar, Mates, Coolies ,
Sweepers etc. working under him in readiness during the time of rain and assist CHO & carry out
instruction as and when required.
5.0 Institutional Framework
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to) following
questions.
5.1 Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding, service provision
in table 1.3. Is it in accordance with the AMRUT guidelines (Clause 8.1)?

Planning and Design Construction/ Implementation O&M

Private Consultant on hire basis/ PMU Cell 1.Cuttack Municipal Corporation Cuttack Municipal Corporation
2. Drainage Division , W.R.Dept., Cuttack

Table 1.3: Functions, roles, and responsibilities

5.2 How city is planning to execute projects?

Cuttack Municipal Corporation &Drainage Division, W.R. Dept., Cuttack will execute the work through
E-Tendering as per OPWD Code & OMC Act. & Rule

5.3 Shall the implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation? If no, weather
resolution has been passed by the Municipal Corporation and accordingly, a tripartite
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between State Government, Municipal Corporation
and Parastatal has been signed?Please refer para 8.1 of AMRUT guidelines.
Yes, it had been passed by the council resolution for implementation of above project to be
done by Municipal Corporation.
II. Bridge the Gap
Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives undertaken in
different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve
universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 & 6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified
objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment and meeting the opportunity to bridge the
gap.

1.1 List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to address these
gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for sector under
different schemes with status and when the existing projects are scheduled to be
completed? Provide information in Table

Status
S. Scheme Month of
Name of Project Cost (as on ddmm
No. Name Completion
2015)

1. Construction and Rehabilitation of JICA Rs 659.11 36 month 20 %

Drainage Facilities in Cuttack Crores
( OWSSB/JICA/OISIP/04)

Table 1.4: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

1.2 How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in storm water drainage
system? Will completion of above improve the coverage of network; eliminate the chocking
of drains and water stagnation problem? If yes, how much. (100 words)
The existing system will able to address only 50 percent of the gap in storm water drainage
system, Yes completion of above will improve additional 20 percent of the coverage of drainage
network and eliminate the chocking of drains and water stagnation problem.

1.3 Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What kind of
services will be required to fulfill the gap?
Yes, the city requires additional infrastructures like construction of new storm water drains, Sluice
gate and Pumping Stations to fulfill the Gap.
1.4 How does the city visualizeto take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects by changing
their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to focusing on
optimum use of existing assets?
It is require rejuvenating the open drains to Covered drains without change of their orientation, so
that it will focus the optimum usage of existing assets.

1.5 Has city conducted assessment of O&M cost of drains and potable pumps? if yes, what is
it? Is city planning to reduce it?
Yes, CMC has conducted the assessment of O&M cost of drains and potable pumps. It is approx.
4 Crore, Yes the CMC is trying to reduce it.

1.6 Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects,

calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for Rejuvenation of existing drains,
construction of new primary and secondary drains, construction of pump house with
pumping machinery, covering of drains. Gaps in Storm water drainage service levels are
provided as per Table 1.5.

1.7 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus on
Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH or
more) in the Table 1.5.
2015 2021
Component Ongoing
Present Total Demand Gap
projects
480.11 24
Major Drains (new construction)
Network requirement to provide proper
drainage to all identified water stagnant
point/ flooding points up to the end discharge
point (in Km)
Network length where households
discharging wastewater directly into the
drains
Rejuvenation of existing primary drains and
primary drains including covering and
installation of filter

1.8 Whether these gaps presented in measurable/ execution able ways considering all the
ongoing projects? (75 words)

2.0 Objectives
Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage. While
developing objectives following question shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate objective.
2.1 Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment?

Yes, the objective has been evolved from the SLB assessment which tries to fill the gap in
order to achieve the 100% universal coverage.
2.2 Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?
Yes, all the objectives has been derived keeping in mind the existing opportunities which would
probably try to bridge the existing gap in order to achieve the 100% universal coverage.
2.3 Does objectives clearly address all these gaps /solution to all the problems related to
storm water drainage of the city?
Yes, each of the objective has been formulated in order to bridge the existing gap and find
solution to all the problems related to storm water drainage of the city.
Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 150 words.
 III. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost
The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to address
thesegaps.These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUTGuidelines; Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9).This
will also include review of smart solutions. The cost estimate with broad source of funding will be
explored for each. While identifying the possible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and its
solutions including status of completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please provide
information on the above responding to (however not limited to) following questions.
1.1 Does all these gaps clearly identified and addressed? (75 words)
Yes. The detail estimate with source of funding have been identified for the SWD which can some
extent improvise the present scenario of expectation with greater utility.

1.2 What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the objectives? (75
words)
The possible activities are as follows:
1) Construction of RCC drain with cover slabs
2) Renovation and repair of the existing drains
3) Construction of sluice gate and pumping stations
4) Desilting of existing drains
5) Running of Pumps during the storms.
The sources of funding are from Central, State and ULB concerned.

1.3 How can the activities be converged with other programme like JICA/ ADB
funded/SBM/Smart city mission projects in the city etc.? (i.e. convergence with other
schemes)(100 words)
The activities are covered with the

1.4 What are the options (financial alternatives) of completing the ongoing activities
specially on going JnNURM projects? (75 words)Cuttack is not covered under the
JnNURM Project.

1.5 What are the lessons learnt during implementation of similar projects? (100 words)
There has been an issue related to execution of the similar project. There exists local and site specific
issues. Further there are also encroachment & eviction of the property adjacent to the SWD.
Also there are various service lines like cable line/ service lines/ phone line laid with the SWD which
creates an unnecessary delay in O&M and also renovation of the SWD. Also, there has been shortage
of staff, lack of skilled personnel, training. The ULB also need proper capacity building for the staffs
and the service providers who can improvise the day to day activities. It is felt that Covering of drains
is very necessary for maintaining heiginec. Further it helps in maintenance as scope of desilting is
reduced considerably.

1.6 Have you analyzed best practices and innovative solutions in sector? Is any of the
practice be replicated in the city?(75 words)
1.6.1 Desilting and cleaning of the drains periodically.
1.6.2 Construction of new drains as per requirements.
1.6.3 Renovation of old drains.
1.6.4 De-watering the storm water by pumps during heavy rains.
1.6.5 New pumping stations has to be developed in the water logging / low lying areas.
 1.6.6 Construction of sluice gates at the MSWC( Main storm water channel) and rivers.

The above practices are replicated in our city, but due to cuttack is encircled with the
two rivers like Mahanadi and Kathajodi, the drain water has not drained easily during
rainy season.

1.7 What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs?(100 words)
There is need of creation of Awareness among the people. Further there it is needed to cover
the drains and there should be Adequate design / renovation of the existing drains.

1.8 Whether reduction in O&M cost by energy efficient pumps etc be applied?(75 words)
Yes , CMC is using the energy efficient pumps to reduce the O&M cost .

1.9 Are different options of PPP such as Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT), Design Built
Finance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) are considered?(100 words)

Sr.
Objective Activities Financing
No.
Source

The alternative activities to meet these activities be defined as per Table 1.6

IV. Citizen Engagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on the
suggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and
activities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize these
activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.6, 6.7
& 7.2). Please explain following questions in not more than 200 words detailing out the needs,
aspirations and wishes of the local people.
1.1 Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?
All the major stakeholder has been included in the consultancy workshop. This includes social
workers, advocates, senior citizen, social activist, media persons, council members etc.

1.2 Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?

Yes, Ward levelconsultations held in the city, however the ward council members were present in
the consultancy workshop.

1.3 Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?

Yes, the alternative has been proposed above the crowd source.

1.4 What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Yes. Most of the feedback / suggestion has been incorporated.
 1.5 Is any new potential alternative is received? If so, how it is addressed?
No
1.6 Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?
Yes alternatives has been received &hasbeen taken up for discussion and implementation
1.7 What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?
Our approach has been taken up with the consideration of prioritizing the more problematic
area with less problematic area as the city is flood affected.

V. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on the
available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please reply following
questions in not more than 200 words.
1.1 What are sources of funds?
The major sources of State fund / ULB fund/ finance commission fund (central)

1.2 Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?
Yes. But partly and indirectly with the Solid Waste Management, for choking of the drains

1.3Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?

Our approach has been taken up with the consideration of prioritizing the more problematic area with
less problematic area as the city is flood affected.
1.4 Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for prioritization of
activities?
Yes, we have taken up approach to completely solve (Universal coverage that is 100% coverage)
the problem of SWD.

VI. Conditionalties
Describe in not more than 300 words the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability of
land, environmental obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval and
permission needed to implement the project. ** (Plz : attach pages)
As the project is for Storm Water Drainage so no major land is required. However, it is
necessary for the pump house. There is requirement of environmental clearance and the NOC for the
outfall points.
The financial commitment, approval and permission isneeded to implement the project from the
concerned department.

VII. Resilience
Required approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience factor would be
built in to ensure environmentally sustainable storm water drainage scheme. Describe in not more
than 300 words regarding resilience built in the proposals. ** (Plz : attach pages)
The BOD and the COD of the storm water should be lower down to the required level so that it doesn’t
affect the nearby environment.
Further, necessary ground water recharge for the area should be considered.
VIII. Financial Plan
Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of capital
cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on the investment
requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for the complete life
cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared. (AMRUTGuidelines; para 4, 6.6, 6.12, 6.13 &
6.14). The financial plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State and
City) including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. While preparing finance plan
please reply following questions in not more than 250 words
 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating
infrastructure projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULB
do not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.
 List of individual projects which are being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50%
state grant. Soft loan from funding agencies will be explored which will form part of ULB
contribution. However, the state share will not be less than 20%.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence and
consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered under
other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned for
projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on
50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultation for
involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.
 Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has been
categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contribute
required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will be
met from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have been
categorized based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUT
scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of apart from infrastructure cost, the O&M requirement of
project life cycle. It will be possible to be sustained throughout the life cycle.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,
and ULBs)
Yes, the initial sharing of financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes various ongoing projects under different schemes supported by both Central &
State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 1.7

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 1.7,1.8,1.9,1.10 and 1.11. These tables are
based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2,2.3.1,2.3.2, and 2.5.
 Table 1.7 Master Plan of Storm Water Drainage Projects for Mission period (As per Table
2.1of AMRUT guidelines)

Priority Year in which to Year in which Estimated

Sr No Project Name proposed to be
number be implemented Cost
completed

1 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in zone 2 1 2015-16 2016-17 36.22

AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/02
2 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-2 2 2016-17 2017-18 46.47
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/03
3 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-4 3
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/04

4 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-1 4 2017-18 2018-19 196.69

AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/01

5 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-5 5

AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/05
6 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-6 6 2018-19 2018-19 99.76
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/06

7 Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in Zone-7 7 2019-20 2019-20 42.61

AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/07

Grant Total 421.75

Table 1.7 Master Plan of Storm Water Drainage Projects for Mission period (As per Table
2.1of AMRUT guidelines)
Change in Service Levels
Estimated
Sr.No Project Name Physical Component Existing After
Indicator Cost
As-Is to Be
1. Construction of covered
storm water drainage Coverage Drainage Network 80.23% 100%
network.
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack 2. Renovation of Existing
1 City in zone 2 Drains 36.22
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/02 3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water Logging 1 0
4. Construction of Pumping
Station and erection of
pumping arrangment.
1. Construction of covered
storm water drainage Coverage Drainage Network 89.76% 100%
network.
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack 2. Renovation of Existing
2 City in Zone-2 Drains 22.79
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/03 3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water Logging 1 0
4. Construction of Pumping
Station and erection of
pumping arrangment.
1. Construction of covered
storm water drainage Coverage Drainage Network 98.40% 100%
network.
2. Renovation of Existing
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack Drains
3 City in Zone-4 3. Construction of wet well. 23.68
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/04 4. Construction of Pumping Incidence of Water Logging 1 0
Station and erection of
pumping arrangment.
 1. Construction of covered Coverage Drainage Network 54.87% 100%
storm water drainage
network.
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack 2. Renovation of Existing
4 City in Zone-1 Drains 127.63
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/01 3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water Logging 1 0
4. Construction of Pumping
Station and erection of
pumping arrangment.
1. Construction of covered Coverage Drainage Network 55.40% 100%
storm water drainage
network.
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack 2. Renovation of Existing
5 City in Zone-5 Drains 69.06
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/05 3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water Logging 1 0
4. Construction of Pumping
Station and erection of
pumping arrangment.
1. Construction of covered
storm water drainage Coverage Drainage Network 6.11% 100%
network.
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack 2. Renovation of Existing
6 City in Zone-6 Drains 99.76
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/06 3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water Logging 1 0
4. Construction of Pumping
Station and erection of
pumping arrangment.
1. Construction of covered
storm water drainage Coverage Drainage Network 25.19% 100%
network.
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack 2. Renovation of Existing
7 City in Zone-7 Drains 42.61
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/07 3. Construction of wet well. Incidence of Water Logging 1 0
4. Construction of Pumping
Station and erection of
pumping arrangment.

Table1.9 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Storm Water Projects

(As per Table 2.3.1of AMRUT guidelines)

Total Share
Sr. No Name of Project Financial Year Project Total
Cost GoI State ULB Others
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in zone
1 2015-16 36.22 18.11 18.11 36.22
2, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/02
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in
2 2016-17 22.79 11.39 11.39
Zone-2, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/03
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in
3 2016-17 23.68 11.84 11.84
Zone-4, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/04
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in
4 2017-18 127.63 63.82 63.82
Zone-1, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/01
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in
5 2017-18 69.06 34.53 34.53
Zone-5, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/SWD/05
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in
6 2018-19 99.76 49.88 49.88
Zone-6, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/06
Augmentation of SWD in Cuttack City in
7 2019-20 42.61 21.30 21.30
Zone-7, AMRUT/OD/CUTTACKE/SWD/07
Total 421.75 210.88 210.88 36.22
 Table 1.10 Annual Fund Sharing Break-up for Storm Water Drainage Projects
(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT Guidelines)

Sr. State ULB

Project GoI Convergence Others Total
No. 14th Others Total 14
th
Others Total
FC FC
1

Total
 Table 1.11 Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements
(As per Table 2.5 of AMRUT guidelines)

Proposed FY2016
Base Present FY FY
Sl.No Project Indicator Gap FY 2017 FY 2020
Line Status 2018 2019
Cost in Cr. H1 H2

1 Coverage of Storm Water Drainage

100% 59% 41% 0% 61.21% 62.35% 83.38% 94.19% 100.00%
Network
421.75
2 Incidence of Water Logging 0 7 7 6 4 3 2 0
Sewerage
 Mission Management Information System

1. Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for
Sewerage (AMRUT Guidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existing
institutional framework for the sector. For this City has to review all policy, plans,
scheme documents etc. to identify service level gaps and hold discussions with
officials and citizens. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. The
zone wise data shall be used in identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will be
added to arrive at city level service gaps. While assessing service level gap reply
following questions not more than word indicated against each question.

Question: What kind of baseline information is available for sewerage system of the
city? Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sewerage
available with city? Is zone wise information available? Have you correlated your
data with census 2011 data? (100 words)
Ans. Census 2011 & CDP are available and have been correlated with census
2011 data.

Question: What are existing service levels for sewerage for coverage of sewerage
network services, efficiency of collection of sewerage and efficiency in treatment. Provide
information in table
Table 2.1 : Status of sewerage network and Service l evels

Sr. No Indicators Existing Service level MOUD Benchmark

Coverage of latrines
1 84% 100%
(individual or community)
2 Coverage of sewerage network services 15% 100%
3 Efficiency of collection of sewerage 15% 100%
Efficiency in Treatment: Adequacy of sewerage
4 37% 100%
treatment capacity

Question: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed
by MoUD? (75 words)

Ans: The gap in said table is self explanatory. The septage management is not upto mark.

Question: Does city has separate drainage system or sewer lines take care of storm
water? (50 words)
Ans: Yes, the city is having partly separate drainage system.
Coverage of latrines (individual or community), Please provide information in

Table 2.2 A

Zone Total number of HH Total number of HH without individual or

Coverage of latrines (%),(a-b)/a*100%
No (a) community toilets within walking distance (b)
1 3635 582 84%
2 22445 3591 84%
3 71794 11487 84%
4 7797 1248 84%
Total 105671 16908 84

SEWERAGE NETWORK AND COLLECTION OF SEWERAGE

Question: How much of the area of the city is covered by sewerage network? What is
the status of household connections in each zone? What are the areas covered under
Septage? Provide information in Table

Table 2.2 b : Sewerage network and collection of sewage

Coverage of sewerage
Total No. of Households with Sewerage
network services
Zone No Households(HH) Network
(b/a)*100%
a b
1 3635 0 0
2 22445 0 0
3 71794 0 0
4 7797 4527 58
Total 105671 4527

Question: Are there any areas where sewer lines have been laid but still households
are not connected to sewer lines? Are there any areas where toilets may be
connected to sewer lines but kitchen or bathroom waste are not connected to
sewerage system? (75 words)

Ans: Such condition does not arise.

Question: Is there any systematic and organized method to collect and treat waste
from septic tanks? What is the duration of cleaning of septic tanks (monthly, quarterly,
semiannually or annually)? Indicate status of overflows of septic tanks, either in the
nearby drains /open fields/ sewerage lines etc? (75 words)

Ans: At present there is no systematic and organized method to collect and treat waste
from septic tanks. Only 5 ( Five) nos. of Cess Pool emptier are available which is not sufficient for
systematic and organized cleaning. As there is no organized method of collection in
many of the cases, the septic tanks overflow either into nearby drains/open fields
etc.
Question: What is the situation of O&M of the existing sewerage system? Does the city
has routine maintenance system or breakdown maintenance system? What is the
duration of cleaning of sewer lines (monthly, quarterly, semiannually or annually)?
Indicate infrastructure available for O&M of the sewerage system i.e sewer jetting
machines etc? (100 words)

Ans: O&M of the existing sewerage system is just manageable.

SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM

Question: Does city has Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)? Which areas are covered
under each of the STPs? Provide details in Table 2.3

Table 2.3: Status of Existing STPs :

Sr. No Location zone Capacity (MLD) Inflow in the STP (MLD) Efficiency in %

1 NIL
2 NIL
3 3 33
4 NIL

Question: Does decentralized waste treatment system exists or planned in the city?
If yes, provide details (75 words)

Ans: One no STP of 33 MLD exists in the city.

Question: How much of sewerage is generated in the city? How much of this sewerage
generated reaches the STPs? What is the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) of incoming
and outgoing sewage of each STP? (100 words)

Ans: Around 70 MLD sewage is generated out of which 33 MLD reaches the STP. Biological
Oxygen Demand (BOD) of incoming and outgoing sewage of STP are around 200 and
20 respectively..

Question: Is treated sewage being reused or recycled? Is treated water being used for
irrigation or industrial purpose? Does the option of power generation being explored?
(75 words)

Ans: No.

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

Question: Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding,
service provision in table

Table: 2.4: Functions, roles, and responsibilities

Planning and
Construction/Implementation O&M
Design
Project team headed by divisional PE OWSSB
Planning and O & M team headed by Municipal
supported by PMU and PDMC . There will be MoU
design Cell in MS Engineer of Cuttack Muncipal
between Municipal Corporation and State Govt/ OWSSB
of OWSSB Corporation .
for implementation.

Question: Please also detail that how city is planning to execute projects. Shall the
implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation or any parastatal body?
(75 words)

Ans: Implementation of project will done by Orissa Water Supply & Sewerage Board
2. BRIDGE THE GAP

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives
undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to
bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 & 6.3,
Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from the
outcome of assessment and meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.

Question: List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to
address these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for
sewerage system under different schemes with status and when the existing projects
are scheduled to be completed? Provide information in Table

Table: 2 . 5 Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

Status (as on dd mm
Sr. No Name of Project Scheme name Cost in Rs Cr Month of completion
2015
Zone 1
Zone 2 886.46 50 % completed
Zone 4
33 mld existing, 16 mld
Zone 3 72.22
in progress
Total 958.68

Question: How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in
sewerage system? Will completion of above will improve the coverage of network and
collection efficiency? If yes, how much. (100 words)

Ans: The existing system will be able to address the existing gap by around 25%.
Completion of proposed project will improve the coverage of network and collection
efficiency by 90 %.

Question: Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What
kind of services will be required to fulfill the gap?

Ans: Yes, the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services. It needs
sewerage system and treatment.

Question: How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects
by changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to
focusing on optimum use of existing assets?

Table 2.6: Demand Gap Assessment.

2015 2021
Component Ongoing
Existing Total Demand Gap
projects
Sewerage net work km 68 379.165 447.2 515.165 68

No of Households covered under

4527 0 4527 136584 132057
sewerage system (2021 demand)
Sewerage treatment plant MLD (2030
33 52 85 89.2 4.2
demand)

Note: The demand gap will be fulfilled as per requirement of CPHEEO Mannual.
Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects,
calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for sewerage network, number of
household to be provided with connections, and required enhancement in capacity of
STP (MLD), area to be covered under septage management. Based on the demand and
gap assessment, evolve objectives to achieve bridging this gap.
Question: Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of
assessment?
Ans: Yes
Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap? Please provide
List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.
Ans: Yes, each objective meets the opportunity to bridge the gap.

3. EXAMINE ALTERNATIVES AND ESTIMATE COST

The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to
address these gaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines;
Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9). This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost estimate
with broad source of funding will be explored for each alternative. While identifying the
possible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and its solutions including status
of completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please reply following questions in
not more than 200 words.
Question: What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the
objectives?
Ans: The activities are sewer net work, treatment and house connection to meet the objective
for universal coverage of sewerage system.
Question: How can the activities be converged with other programmes like JICA/ ADB
funded projects in the city etc?

Ans: yes.

Question: What are the options of completing the ongoing activities?

Ans: here does not arise. But done Through State Govt and other funding.

Question: How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learnt
during implementation of these projects?
Ans: The bottlenecks that is disposal arrangements, reuse of treated waste water etc learnt
have been addressed and shall be taken care during implementation of these projects
under AMRUT.

Question: Has projects includes O&M of sewerage system?

Ans: Yes.

Question: What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs? Can the option of
sale of treated wastewater be applicable to recover the O&M cost.

Ans: Collection of new connection fees and monthly sewerage fees.

 Question: What are innovative alternative solutions explored in achieving objectives?

Ans: Options for STP methodology and reuse of treated waste water have been explored in
achieving objectives.

Question: Are different options of PPP such as Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT),

Design Built Finance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) are considered?

Ans: Yes, Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT) will be considered.

Question: How the recycle and reuse of waste water will be done? How much quantity of
treated water may be reused?

Ans: Does not arise.

Question: Have you analysed best practices and innovative solutions in sewerage
sector? Is any of the practice be replicated in the city?

Ans: Yes.

Question: Have you identified the areas for decentralized waste treatment
system? Explore the approaches for septage management i.e People
Public Private Partnership (PPPP) model or replacing septic tanks by bio-
digesters, bioremediation etc.

Ans: Decentralized waste treatment system provided.

The alternative activities to meet these activities be defined as per Table 2.7

Table2.7 Alternative Activities To Meet Objectives

Sl. No Objective Activities Financing Source

Universal coverage with Sewerage system and construction of STP, re use

1 AMRUT
sewerage system of treated waste water.

4. CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT
Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up
will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize these
activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT
Guidelines; Para
6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please reply following questions in not more than 200
words.

Question: Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?

Ans: Yes

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?

Ans: Yes

Question: Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?

Ans: Yes through website.

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Ans: Proposed proposal is well appreciated.

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?

Ans: Yes.

Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Ans: Keeping in mind how the house holds can be well covered under sewerage facilities opted
for achieving early coverage of the gap assessed under AMRUT.

5. PRIORITIZE PROJECTS

Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on
the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please reply
following questions in not more than 200 words.

Question: What are sources of funds?

Ans: State Govt. fund/ Govt. of India fund

Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?

Ans: Yes

Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?

Ans: Yes.

Question: Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for
prioritization of activities?

Ans: Yes.

6. CONDITIONALITIES

Describe the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability of land, environmental

obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval and permission
needed to implement the project. Please reply following questions in not more than 100 words.

Ans: Govt land has been identified and available. Envoronmental clearance applied and other
clearances / NOC are under process.

7. RESILIENCE

Required approvals will be sought from competent authority and organisations. The resilience
factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Please reply
following questions in not more than 100 words.

Ans: The proposed project under AMRUT and ongoing/ sanctioned would be built-in to ensure
environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Also Odisha State Pollution Board requirements
shall be adhered to.
8. FINANCIAL PLAN

Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of
capital cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on the
investment requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for the
complete life cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 4,
6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders
(Centre, State and City) including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. While
preparing finance plan please reply following questions in not more than 200 words
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?

Yes, projects proposed include O&M for 5 years. O&M shall be integral part of the
execution contract so that the agency/contractor who develops the assets shall be
responsible for post asset creation O&M for 5 years. The O&M cost for Water Supply
shall be borne by the OWSSB (Odisha Water Supply and Sewerage Board).

 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre,

State, ULBs and)

Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.

 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?

Yes, it includes convergence with various ongoing projects under different schemes
supported by both Central & State grant.

 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?

Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 8.1

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. These tables
are based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

Table 8.1 Master Plan of Sewerage Projects for Mission period

Infrastructure Improvement
Change in Service Levels Estimated Cost
Project Name and Code6 (list all projects to
Sr. No. achieve universal coverage in the City Year in which
separately for water supply and sewerage Priority Year in which to (Amount in Rs.
proposed to be
number be implemented Cr.)
completed
Sewerage System for CUTTACK , Zone 1 –
1 Sewer network AMRUT/OD/ CUTTACK 3 2016-17 2017-18 139.42
/SG/01
Septage Management for CUTTACK
2 1 2015-16 2015-16 1.86
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/02
Septage Management for CUTTACK
3 2 2015-16 2015-16 1.94
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/03
Septage Management for CUTTACK
4 4 2015-16 2015-16 3.37
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/04

Grand Total Total AMRUT 146.59

on going 958.68
 Table 8.2: Master Service Levels Improvements during Mission Period

(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

Infrastructure Improvement
Estimated
Change in Service Levels
Sl. Cost
Project Name and code7
No. Physical components (Amount in
Existing After
Indicator Rs. Cr)
(As-is) (To-be)
Sewerage System for CUTTACK a .Coverage
Sewer network &
1 , Zone 1 – Sewer network b. Collection 0% 100% 139.42
house connection
AMRUT/OD/ CUTTACK /SG/01 efficiency
Septage Management for
Collection &
2 CUTTACK FSM work 0% 100% 1.86
Treatment
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/02

Septage Management for

Collection &
3 CUTTACK FSM work 0% 100% 1.94
Treatment
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/03

Septage Management for

Collection &
4 CUTTACK FSM work 0% 100% 3.37
Treatment
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/04

Total 146.59

Table 8.3 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Sewerage Projects

Total Share
Sector Project Others Total in
cost GoI State ULB
(OUIDF ) Cr
Sewerage and Septage management
Proposed Projects
Sewerage System for CUTTACK , Zone 1 – Sewer
139.42 0 0 0
network AMRUT/OD/ cUTTACK /SG/01
Septage Management for CUTTACK
1.86 0.93 0.93 1.86
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/02
Septage Management for CUTTACK
1.94 0.97 0.97 1.94
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/03

Septage Management for CUTTACK

3.37 1.685 1.685 3.37
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/04

Total 7.17
 Table 8.4: Annual Fund Sharing Break-up for Sewerage Projects
Sr. State ULB

Convergence

Others
Total in

14thFC

Others
Project GoI 14th
No. Others Total Total Cr
FC

Sewerage System for

CUTTACK , Zone 1 – Sewer
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
network AMRUT/OD/
cUTTACK /SG/01
Septage Management for
2 CUTTACK 0.93 0.93 0.93 1.86
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/02
Septage Management for
3 CUTTACK 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.94
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/03
Septage Management for
4 CUTTACK 1.69 1.69 1.69 3.37
AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK /SG/04
Total 7.170

Table 8.5:Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Annual Targets
Total (Increment from the Baseline Value)
Proposed Projects Project Indicator8 Baseline9 FY 2016 /
Cost in Cr 2015-16 FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020
H1 H2
Ongoing Sewerage
958.68
Project
Sewerage and
Septage 146.59
Management
1. Coverage of
latrines
84% 73% 89% 97% 100% 100% 100%
(individual or
community)
2. Coverage of
sewerage 15% 15% 15% 50% 100% 100% 100%
network services
3. Efficiency of
Collection of 0% 0% 0% 50% 100% 100% 100%
Sewerage
4. Efficiency in
0% 0% 10% 70% 100% 100% 100%
treatment
Urban Transport
 Mission Management Information System

SECTOR WISE SLIP TEMPLATE: URBAN TRANSPORT

Under AMRUT Mission, Urban Transport components which are admissible are; Side- walks, Foot-
over bridges, Non-motorized transport (NMT), Buses, BRTS, Multi-level parking, Waterways Ferry
vessels Ferries and Waterways. (AMRUT Guidelines; para3).

1. Service Level Gaps Assessment

1.SERVICELEVELSTATUS

Assess the existing transportation situation and service levels gaps for indicators urban to achieve
service level benchmarks. (AMRUT Guidelines Table.1.4 & Table 2.5). Service Level gaps will be
analyzed as per indicators prescribed in Service LevelBenchmarks (SLBs) for urban transport of
MoUD, GoI. Please provide information in200 words responding to the following questions;

Q1) Question: What isthe baseline information available for improvement city transportation?Whether
City has prepared City Mobility Plan? If yes then, Does CMP includes NMT, Ferries, water ways?
Answer: An Integrated City Mobility Plan has been prepared considering the cluster of 3 cities
Bhubaneswar, Cuttack and Puri. A City Development Plan (CDP) has been prepared and Detailed
Project Report (DPR) for City bus services has been prepared which elucidates the future
requirement of the city bus fleet and all other infrastructure required. The present rolling stock
structure for the City has been identified through the DPR. The CMP includes the study relates to
identification and proposals of NMT. There is no particular study required with respect to
Waterways or ferries.

There are four Levels of Services (LOS) which will be calculated considering various indicators as
LOS1, LOS2, LOS3 and LOS4 correspond to adequacy and quality of city’s availabletransportation
services. The summary of the service level gap and performance should be presented as per
illustrative Table

Table: Service level Benchmark

Present
Sl. No Indicators Levels of Service as per SLB, MoUD Service
Level
Level of
Range
Service Service
Coverage of 1 >=1
1 urban 4
2 0.7-1
transport in
the city 3 0.3-0.7
4 <0.3
 Level of
Availability of Range
Service
urban
2 transport per 1 >=0.6 4
1000 2 0.4-0.6
population
3 0.2-0.4
4 <=0.2

TOTAL BUSES =
TOTAL ROUTE KMS =
TOTAL POPN =
TOTAL AREA =

Q2) Question: Have level of services (LOS) been calculated based on the indicators prescribed in the
SLB for urban transport by Ministry of Urban Development? As per MoUD SLB for urban transport,
there are four Levels of Services (LOS) which will be calculated considering various indicators as
LOS1, LOS2, LOS3 and LOS4 correspond to adequacy and quality of city’s available transportation
services.

Answer:Yes

Q3) Question: While assessing the above indicators, also analyze following aspects as an outcome of
the broad components of urban transport under AMRUT;

a) Non-Motorised Transport Facilities

1. % of network covered

2. Encroachment on NMT roads by vehicle parking (%)

3. NMT parking facilities at interchanges (%)

Answer:

No NMT available.

b) Parking: Availability of parking spaces

Answer:

Sr.No. Location
1 On stretch ofRing Road after Sati Chaura Square
2 On stretch of Local road near Mohammadia and Alisha Bazar
3 On Stretch ofRoad near A3IT
On local road connecting Ring road and Deulsahi road near
4
Orissa High court
5 On stretch oflocal road nearFlowerMarketRoad
6 On Link Road near Badambadi Bus stand
7 On stretch ofRing road below ROB to NH5 connecting
 8 On stretch ofroad adjacent to Municipalfield from NM5 service road
9 On Cuttuck-Paradip Road near OMP petrol pump
10 On stretch ofLocal road parallel to Canal road near Trinath Temple
11 On Mahtab Road
12 On stretch of Haripur Road between Ravenshaw college and
13 Seminary
On stretchCollege
of Haripur road from Subhash 8ose Gate to ICICI Bank ATM
14 On stretch of local road between Odiya Bazar
15 On stretch of Local road near Sutahat
16 On Stadium Road near Chandi Mandir
17 On stretch of local road near New Stewart School
18 On stretch of local road from Tlnikonia Bagichia road parallel to
19 Badi Masjidofroad
On stretch local road off 3ajrakbati road near Shree Hari
20 Bhavan
On stretch of road near PG Botany Dept of Ravenshaw Universi- ty
21 On stretch of local road near lajpat Rai DAV Public school
22 On stretch of Road near Cuttack Railway Station entrance NH
23 side
On stretch of NH 5 service near Mahanadi Vihar road
24 On Railway Station Inner service road
25 On Railway station Inner service road - North side
26 On stretch of Peripheri Road near Hara Mani Mandap
27 On stretch of Jobra Road near Bombay Inn
28 On stretch of periphery road near Jobra colony (in front of Durga
29 Hotel)
On stretch of road East of Orissa Cricket Academy
30 On Stadium road in front of Barabati Stadium

Q4) Question: Have specific issues for the city been identified and addressed including issues with the
existing traffic, NMT, parking / transport environment?

Answer:

• Lack of structured land use and transportation integration

• Absence of mass transit system and heavy reliance on personal transport
• Insufficient traffic management measures leading to congestion
• Encroachment of roadside activities on roads and sidewalks
• Illegal parking
• Disorderly traffic coupled with mixing of fast and slow moving mode
• Poor road condition

Sidewalks, Foot-over bridges and NMT

Q5) Question: Do you think city roads are safe for pedestrians? If no then, which section of roads needs
immediate attention?

Answer: No. Most of the roads are very compact and have very less ROW leading to jams and
congestion and pollution. No proper integration of landuses and there are insufficient provisions for
pedestrians and cyclists.
Q6) Question: What type of Non-Motortised Vehicle (NMV) infrastructure available in the city?

1. Lanes reserved for NMV

2. Footpath allocated for both pedestrian and NMV

3. Area allocated to NMV parking

Answer:No footpaths available.

Q7) Question: Has budget provision for NMT included in the transportation projects in the city?

Answer: No

Buses and BRTS

Q8) Question: Have city initiated feasibility of BRTS?

Answer: No

Q9) Question: What kind of public transport is available in the city? Please mentionNumber of public
transport vehicles operating in the city.

Answer: City Bus Services. 24 buses are available

Q10) Question: What is the total length of public transport corridor in the city limits?

Answer: 30 kms (approx.)

Multi-level parking

Q11) Question: Whether city has designated parking spaces? If yes, provide list of

Answer:No Multi level parking available.

Proposed: Near High Court, Barabati Statium, Railway Station

Q12) Question: What is the total available on street paid parking spaces on Arterial, sub arterial roads?

Answer:

Availability of paid parking spaces

Total available on street paid parking spaces = (a) = 12

Total available on street Parking Spaces = (b) = 30

Availability of paid parking spaces = (a/b) *100 = 12/30*100 = 40%

Q13) Question: Whether parking supply inventory is available for the city including; Types of on-road and
off road parking restrictions (time of day, duration, private etc)

Answer: NO
Q14) Question: Whether parking facilities available for bicycles, auto rickshaw, goods delivery.

Answer: Yes. Near Railway Station.

Q15) Question: Is private sector involved in parking?

Answer: Yes

Q16) Question: Whether adopted parking bans/restrictions on major roads .

Answer: Yes

Waterways and Ferry vessels

If city has waterways system then provide following questions;

Q17) Question: Whether city has inland waterways system?

Answer: No

Q18) Question: Who is managing and operating the ferry system? if any

Answer: No

Q19) Question: Provide number of ferry vessels

Answer: No

Institutional Set Up

Describe the institutional framework including role and responsibilities in terms; administration and
Policy making, planning, Vehicle Registration, public transportation operators including Private
operators and overall traffic management.

Role and Responsibilities of all the agencies shall be provided in the illustrative tableNo. 2

Table: Role and responsibility of agencies involved in management of City transport

Sl.
Agencies Responsibilities
NO
1 CDA, CMC Planning
2 CUTSL, BPTSL City Bus Services
3 RTO Vehicle Registration
4 Traffic police under SP (Police) Traffic Management
Collector (Cuttack) , Commissioner (H&UD) & District Magistrate, Vice Chairman (CDA), Administrative and
5
Municipal commissioner (CMC) Policy Making

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions;

Q20) Question: Who is responsible for management of urban transport in the city?

Answer: As per date, there is an SPV named CUTSL but the buses are plied by BPTSL as some of
the bus fleet has been diverted towards Cuttack
Q21) Question: Is there enough provisions for enforcement of traffic rules for pedestrian safety on roads?

Answer: No

Q22) Question: How are you planning for execution of transport related projects for AMRUT, whether,
present role and responsibilities lying with these organizations is capable to implement projects
under AMRUT?

Answer: Yes

1.2 Status of On-going Projects

Critically examine the existing and ongoing projects for improvement of urban transport as to be
filled in illustrative Table No.3

Notice: Undefined index: table12_proposed_projects in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransport-result.php on line 312

Status of
Approved Cost Expenditure
Project/Sector projects Scheme
(Rs. Lakhs) (Rs. Lakhs)
(till May 13)

Q23) Question: Whether convergence with other ongoing Central and State and LocalGovernment
Programs/Schemes can be done at this stage.

Answer: Yes

Q24) Question: Whether ongoing scheme and projects has been critically reviewed? Please explain what
is the extent of convergence to bridge the gaps?

Answer: Yes
 2. Bridging the Gap
Demand Gap Assessment

Despite the fact, non-motorized modes and public transit account for a significant proportion of
travel activity of a city. The city needs to pursue different strategies and programs for bridging the
gap on transportation facilities where the city is and where it wishes to go in future.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions

Q25) Question: What steps can be taken to bridge these gaps? Please explain in 200 words,

Answer:Cuttack needs to enhance itself to become an international level body with considering
the transport aspect a bit higher. The city needs to develop several strategies to overcome huge
gap of transport facility to citizens.

 Construction of Outer and Inner Ring Roads

 Mass Rapid Transit Systems such as Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) & Metro Rail (MRTS)
 Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
 Multi Level and Off Street Parking facilities
 High level Street facilities with integrated NMT and pedestrian walkways
 Traffic and vehicular Safety with Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS)
 Transport System Management Systems
 And various other innovations could be identified to make the city Transport oriented city with best
mobility solutions for the city.

Whether present level gaps as identified through SLB indicators will be achievable by 2021 as
compare with the present level of gap and demand?. (Table)

Table: Bridging the gap- Demand Assessment

Demand/
Present
Sl. No Benchmark Levels of Service as per SLB, MoUD Current Gap Target by
Service Level
2011

LoS Range

Service Coverage of urban 1 >=1

1 4
transport in the city 2 0.7-1
3 0.3-0.7
4 <0.3

LoS Range
Availability of urban 1 >=0.6
2 transport per 1000 4
2 0.4-0.6
population
3 0..2-0.4
4 <=0.2
Other indicators
 LoS Range
Percentage of City 1 >=75
3 Covered by footpaths 4
2 50-75
wider than 1.2m
3 25-50
4 <25
Non Motorised Transport
4
Facilities including;

LoS Range
1 >=50
a) % of network covered 4
2 50-25
3 25-15
4 <15

LoS Range
Encroachment on NMT
1 <=10
b) roads by vehicle parking 4
(%) 2 0-20
3 20-30
4 >30

LoS Range

NMT parking facilities at 1 >=75

c) 4
interchanges (%) 2 50-75
3 25-50
4 <25

Level of
Range
Service
Availability of On-street
5 paid public parking spaces 1 >=75 3
(%) 2 50-75
3 25-50
4 <25

LoS Range

1 >=1
6 Water ways and Ferries 4
2 0.7-1
3 0.3-0.7
4 <0.3

3. Objectives
The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to address these
gaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines: para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9).
 Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions;

Q26) Question: How will you define your overall goal to improve city transport?

Answer: The vision statement of urban transport for Cuttack is to:

‘To regulate, inclusively plan and develop an efficient, effective and well integrated transport system
promoting economic competitiveness and vitality through efficient, high-quality transport services for
passengers and freight through

• Enhancing mobility in an environmentally, socially sensitive manner

• Inducing modal shift in favour of public transport
• Providing pedestrian transport infrastructure.
• Providing seamless connectivity

Q27) Question: What possible strategies envisaged to achieve various LoS to improve the transportation
components under AMRUT?

Answer:

• Conversion of Kucha roads to Pucca Roads

• Augmentation of City Buses Services
• Construction of Parking Spaces for private vehicles
• Non Motorised Transport provision and pedestrian facility for enhanced mobility
• Integrating of Intelligent Transport Systems with transport structure
• Automated Signalisation at all junctions

Q28) Question: How well does goals and objective for developing efficient urban transportation facilities
can articulate the use of NMT options and parking facilities to improve the quality oflife of local
citizens?

Answer:

Segregated pedestrian and NMV corridor, Bus lanes and bus stops, Adequate crossing facilities for
Pedestrians/NMVs, Signalized improved intersection for addressing to the requirements of all
modes of traffic including pedestrian / NMT’s, Auto rickshaw stand & cycle rickshaw stands on Multi
Utility Zone, Planting for Storm Water Management, Auto-rickshaw Stands, Cycle-rickshaw Stands,
Hawker Zones, Paid Car Parking, Street Furniture, Bus Stops, Traffic Police Booths, MTNL boxes,
Fire hydrants, Junction boxes, Street lights/ pedestrian lights, etc

Q29) Question: How identified each objective can evolve considering bridging the gap with present level
of services as to achieve SLB indicators.

Answer: Mainly, Parking spaces mentioned earlier need to be developed to decongest roads of
unofficial parking of the vehicles. Augmentation of city buses giving way to public transport and
pedestrians.
Q30) Question: How objectives can be framed ensuring sustainable mobility solutions and creating city-
wide NMT facilities for pedestrians and cyclists.

Answer:

1. By widening the road and implementing cycle tracks and pedestrian walkways .
2. By acquisition of more city buses for better accessibility.

Q31) Question: Howe objectives for improvement of NMT facilities integrate with other modes of
transport.

Answer: The objectives need to be framed in such a manner so to provide safe and secure
way to promote walkability and mobility to citizens. Improving main road structure and
enforcing the most congested and crowded zones of the city such as markets, mandis, old
city areas, railway station etc to convert them to NMT zones.

4. Alternate Activities to Meet Objectives

Evolve overall objective is to ensure that mobility solutions for the city that are sustainable
and create city-wide NMT facilities for pedestrians and cyclists and integrate them with other
modes of transport. Suggest possible strategies and options to achieve each objective with
estimate cost of alternate solutions as per table 1 & Table 2

Table1:PossibleStrategiestomeetobjectives

Sl. Possible Financing

Objectives
No Activities Source
Construction of Street Parking off street parking,
1
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01) paid parking
Construction of Footpaths Pedestrian
2
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02) walkways, footpaths
Augmentation of City Bus fleet Increase of fleet
3
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03) and routes
Construction of Cycle Tracks
4
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04)
Construction of Multi Level Parking
5 Multi level parking
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05)
Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal
6
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06)
Construction of Bus Q Shelters
7
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
8
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08)
 Table2:EstimatedCostforvariouspossibleactivities

Total Cost
Sl. No Projects Unit Quantity
(in Crores)
Construction of Street Parking
1 No 4 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01)
Construction of Footpaths
2 Kms 3 2.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet Buse
3 100 12.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03) s
Construction of Cycle Tracks
4 Kms 5 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04)
Construction of Multi Level Parking
5 No 3 8.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05)

Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal

6 No 1 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06)
Construction of Bus Q Shelters
7 No 20 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
8 No 5 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08)
43.00

While addressing alternate solution to achieve these objects, please provide information in
500 words responding to the following questions:

Q32) Question: How realistic and feasible urban transport strategies are to be evolved to address
key challenges, priorities as an outcome of the citizen consultation

Answer: With respect to the citizen and stakeholder consultation, there are several actions
that need to be addressed to improve the city wide transportation scenario. Mostly
improving/widening/upgradation of roads, improved network of CBS, installation of NMT
facilities at congested areas, development of truck terminal, parking areas and rickshaw
areas etc

Q33) Question: What alternative innovative solution can be adopted for improving the service
delivery by creating

a: Citizen friendly provision of barrier free pedestrian facilities including, footpaths, road
marking and signages

Answer: Vehicle tracking System, automatic pedestrian crossing facility,

b: pathways

Answer:Urban planning with built-in street design,

 c: Parking

Answer:Multilevel parking spaces, Zoning near the congested areas to promote NMT

d: traffic management using ITS

Answer: Vehicle tracking System, Surveillance System, GIS based traffic analysis

Q34) Question: What strategic intervention is required in the implementation of above projects

Answer: Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), Traffic Management Committees or agencies etc
appointed to overlook and undertake the specific tasks related to the transport criteria such
as widening the roads, Creating path way, Proper traffic arrangement

Q35) Question: Whether alternative modes of transport such as cycling can be provided in major
roads

Answer: Yes

Q36) Question: Whether non-Motorised Transport (NMT) facilities corridor suggested with
dedicated NMV, Cycle track and Signalized Intersection count.

Answer: Yes

Q37) Question: How innovative solutions for alternative modes of transport including NMT such as
cycling, pedestrian and public transportation system will address the overall transportation
issue of the city?

Answer: this would shape the future city transportation in such a way to improve mobility of
the city with barrier free pedestrian movement and enhanced levels of safety and security

Q38) Question: What will be the source of funding for identified project?

Answer: Govt. grants under AMRUT, State and PPP

Q39) Question: Whether convergence with other scheme has been made. Please explain each
identified projects and their source of funding such as AMRUT, 14th FC and also converge
with other schemes.

Answer: Yes

5. Citizen Engagement
Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be prioritized
to meet the service level gaps. The section will summarize the Citizens priorities for adoption
of alternate solution of urban mobility, drawing on SLIPpreparation.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Q40) Question: Have all stakeholders including residents (RWAs), Transporters, RTOs,Traffic
Police attended the citizen consultation?

Answer:Yes
Q41) Question: Has alternate proposed crowd sourced?

Answer:Yes

Q42) Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Answer:the most important criteria for citizens is enhancing the public transport which can
cater to almost all the areas of the city. Secondly, to designate various parking spaces so to
decongest the main roads.

Q43) Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?

Answer: Yes

Q44) Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Answer: Studying the entire area and identifying the loopholes in the service provision.

Q45) Question: How citizen has been exposed best practices and smart solutions in order to
generate citizen-driven solutions for urban mobility?

Answer: Workshops

Q46) Question: Please examine whether identified solutions are addressing citizens requirement

Answer:Yes

Q47) Question: Whether ULB have adequate resources to implement prioritized alternate
solutions?

Answer: Yes

Q48) Question: How innovative alternate options of NMT facilities examined and shared with
citizens?

Answer: Workshops

6. Prioritization of projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up
based on the available resources to meet the respective objective. (AMRUT Guidelines; para
6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following
questions:

Q49) Question: Are innovative solution prioritized based on the available resources and demand
of citizens?

Answer:Yes

Q50) Question: Has source of funding considered while prioritizing the project?

Answer: Yes
Q51) Question: Whether project has been prioritized considering last mile connectivity?

Answer: Yes

Table1:Possible Strategies to meet objectives

Priority Cost Financing

Project
No (inCr.) Source
Construction of Street Parking
5.00 AMRUT/STATE
1 (AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01)
Construction of Footpaths
2.00 AMRUT/STATE
2 (AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet
12.00 AMRUT/STATE
3 (AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle Tracks
3.00 AMRUT/STATE
4 (AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04)
Construction of Multi Level Parking
8.00 AMRUT/STATE
5 (AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05)
Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal
5.00 AMRUT/STATE
6 (AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06)
Construction of Bus Q Shelters
5.00 AMRUT/STATE
7 (AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
3.00 AMRUT/STATE
8 (AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08)
43.00

7. Out of Box Solution Used

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:
Q52) Question: What are the out of box thinking on alternative and new innovative solutions for
the following;

a: Citizen friendly provision of barrier free pedestrian facilities including, footpaths, road
marking and signages,

Answer:Escalators and underpasses for pedestrian movement, solar lighting and panels for
signages and road marking.

b: pathways

Answer: Escalators and travelators, automated Subway Systems for pedestrian movement

c: parking

Answer:Automated Valet System, Mobile integrated citizen info systems, parking line alarms,

d: traffic management using ITS

Answer: Real Time Vehicle tacking using Satellite imagery

Q53) Question: Whether solution provided to improve the safety of vulnerable groups such as old
age/handicapped/children

Answer: Yes

8. Conditionalities Fulfilled and Resilience Built-in

First and foremost condition is to identify the availability of land for projects such as parking,
widening of roads for pedestrian, cycle tracks and hawkers zone. Further, agencies need to
be brought on board for any new initiatives as part of convergenceprocess and necessary
approval and permissions.

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:

Q54) Question: Whether described the conditionalities of each project in terms ofavailability of
land parking,widening of roads for pedestrian, cycle tracks and hawkers zone?

Answer: Yes.

Q55) Question: How these projects will be funded? Are projects being implemented through own
sources or borrowing then which is the commitment in this regard.

Answer: Govt, State and PPP mode

Q56) Question: Has environmental obligation such as clearances and NOC required? Please
suggest action and initiatives need to be taken in this regards

Answer: Yes

9. Financial Plan
Prepare Financial Plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development. The financial
plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State, ULBs and)
including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. Describe briefly the
institutional arrangement), leveraging potential partnerships,convergence with other
Government Schemes, monitoring and evaluation and also provide year-wise milestones and
outcomes.

Q57) Question: How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating
infrastructure projects? Explain in 200 words how these institutional arrangements are
leveraging partnership and converge with government scheme and provide list of individual
projects which is being financed by various stakeholders.

Answer: Yes. Funding in the sector under various schemes by various stakeholders are
considered.

Question: Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence
and consultation with funding partners?

Answer: Yes. Financial plan to consider the convergence under identified projects.
Q58) Question: What are the different sources of funding being tapped for this project.(75 words)

Answer: Through Central, State, ULB and community Participation and fundinf from other
development agencies through pooling of resources

Q59) Question: Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has
been categorized based on financial considerations (100 words)

Answer: Yes. Financial structure is to be prepared on a sustainable business model

considering the project priority and fund availability.

Q60) Question: Have the financial assumptions been listed out? Please provide the list. (100
words)

Answer: No

Q61) Question: Have the financial assumptions been listed out? Please provide the list. (100
words)

Answer: No
 10. Finalization of Master Service LevelImprovement Plan

Q62) Question: Discuss Draft Master Service Level Improvement Plan with citizen. Based on the final
citizen consultations, prepare final Master Service Level Improvement Plan. Annual Plan will be
prepared as an application for monitoring the improvement in achieving the service level indicators
as targeted in the Service level improvement plan. (AMRUT Guideline; Table 2.1, 2.2, 2.3., 2.4 and
2.5) and Annual Plan (AMRUT Guidelines; Annexure-2, 3, 4, 5& 6)

Answer:

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. These tables are
based on Amrut guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

MASTER SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS DURING MISSION PERIOD

(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)

Notice: Undefined index: table6_sno in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.phpOn line 869

Physical Change in Service Levels

SN Project Name Estimated Cost
Components Indicator Existing Proposed
Construction of Street Parking
1 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01)
Construction of Footpaths
2 2.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet
3 12.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle Tracks
4 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04)

Construction of Multi Level Parking

5 8.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05)

Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal

6 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06)
Construction of Bus Q Shelters
7 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07)

Construction of Foot Over Bridges

8 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08)

9 43.00
 ANNUALFUNDSHARINGPATTERNFORSEWERAGE PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.1 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)

Notice: Undefined index: table7_sno in

/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.phpOn line 917

Sl. Total Project Share

Name of Project
No Cost GoI State ULB Others Total
Construction of Street Parking
1 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01)
Construction of Footpaths
2 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet
3 12.00 6.00 6.00 12.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle Tracks
4 3.00 1.50 1.50 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04)
Construction of Multi Level Parking
5 8.00 4.00 4.00 8.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05)
Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal
6 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06)
Construction of Bus Q Shelters
7 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
8 3.00 1.50 1.50 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08)
9 43.00 21.50 21.50 43.00
ANNUAL FUND SHARING BREAK-UP FOR SEWERAGE PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

Notice: Undefined index: table8_sno in /var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.php
On line 973
State ULB
Sl. No Project GoI Convergence Others Total
14th FC Others Total 14th FC Others Total

Construction of Street Parking

1 2.50 2.50 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01)
Construction of Footpaths
2 1.00 1.00 2.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet
3 6.00 6.00 12.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle Tracks
4 1.50 1.50 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04)

Construction of Multi Level Parking

5 4.00 4.00 8.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05)

Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal

6 2.50 2.50 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06)

Construction of Bus Q Shelters

7 2.50 2.50 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
8 1.50 1.50 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08)

9 21.50 21.50 43.00

YEAR WISE PLAN FOR SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Notice: Undefined index: table9_proposed_projects in /var/www/html/amrut/urbantransport-result.php on line 1033

Annual Targets
(Increment from the Baseline Value)
Sl. No Proposed Projects Project Cost Indicator Baseline FY 2016
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
H1 H2
Construction of Street Parking
1 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/01)
Construction of Footpaths
2 2.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/02)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet
3 12.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/03)
Construction of Cycle Tracks
4 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/04)
Construction of Multi Level Parking
5 8.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/05)
Construction of Bus Depot/Terminal
6 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/06)
Construction of Bus Q Shelters
7 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
8 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/CUTTACK/UT/08)
9 43.00
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Urban Transport
Mission Management Information System -PARKS

CUTTACK

PARKS AND PLAY GROUNDS

The objective of this template is to assist ULBs in preparation of SLIP for Green Space and Parks component for
rejuvenation of at least one park in each of the 500 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) involving creation and upgradation of
basic elements, especially for the youth, children and the elderly. Rejuvenation also includes involving local citizens
and groups in the maintenance and upkeep of the park in order to make the development sustainable. Cost of this
component will be met from the 2.5 per cent annual allocation for development of parks under the Mission and used
in accordance with its Guidelines. (Refer AMRUT Guidelines: Section 5.1 Sr.No.6, 6.7 & Annexure-1 Sr.No.4) SLIP
would involve write up on following sections:

1. Assess the Service Level Gap

First and foremost aspect of SLIP is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for organised Green
Space and Parks based on standards prescribed in URDPFI Guidelines (Refer AMRUT Guidelines; Para 3.1.6 &
6.2). This shall also include describing existing institutional framework vis-à-vis development and maintenance of
organised green space/ parks. In order to assess the service level gap the City shall have to review all policies,
plans; scheme documents etc., hold discussions with concerned officials and citizens, as per the requirement and
conduct physical assessment of city parks to understand the current status (Refer Indicative Parks Assessment Tool
as given in Annex-1 of this document). The city should undertake overall assessment of Parks and Open/ Green
Space in terms of a) Physical Activities Resources, b) Family Facilities including child friendly play equipment’s, c)
Available General Services and Facilities, and, d) Aesthetics and other
While discussing about the existing status of the organised green space in your city make a sincere effort to analyze
the proportion of area under the categorization of parks as per URDPFI Guidelines eg: Housing Area Park (HAP),
Neighbourhood Park (NP) Community Park (CP), District Park (DP), and Sub-City Park (SCP). Also focus on
qualitative aspects of existing parks like geographical distribution across the city, encroachments, child and elderly
friendly features; staffing, maintenance & equipment issues; and maintenance by RWAs/ Corporates under their
CSR Activities etc.

Please respond to the questions given below (Word Limit: 800 words).

Question: What are the available data sources/ plans/ reports/ schemes that exist as regards development
and maintenance of parks?
Cuttack municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks such as name of the park, area, O&M
costs and brief description about the parks apart from this there is a CDP report mentioning about this sector in the
Landuse Pattern. But the existing parks are developed with the help of state government and maintenance of the
parks is covered in the municipal expenditure

Question: Review the recommendation on open/ green space as per Master Plan/ Development Plan and
map existing green cover against the same. Identify the areas where there is deficiency of open/green space
There is a CDP which provide the landuse 0.98% and stating that green spaces have tobedeveloped in the city but
there is no document where the deficiency of open/green spaces identified to fill the gap and
there is a map showing the existing green space locations for the city.
Question: Does the ULB follow URDPFI Guidelines to categorize its organized greens/ parks/ open space or
follow its own categorization? If ULB follow its own categorization, what is the rationale and how well they
are interlinked to development of parks?
Cuttack municipality does not categorize the parks and open spaces as per the hierarchy of organized green spaces
based on population and area criteria as prescribed by URDPFI guidelines it only categorizes parks in developed
and undeveloped category .

Question: What is the per person open space availability in the city in general and within built-up areas?
466.1478 acres is the cumulative area of developed parks in the Cuttack town and open spaces and
playgrounds spread over the city for children’s to play and elders to take a fresh walk in the morning but these
play grounds and not equipped with any amenities.

Service Level Status

Present Reliability
Sr. No Indicators Benchmark Source
Status Factors
Per person open space in plain
1 3.09Sq.m 10 -12 Sq. m CDP C
areas as per URDPFI guidelines
Source:URDPFI–2014 & Analysis of ULB Level Data

Question: Have the ULB/ City prepared park wise inventory of facilities and amenities? (ULB should identify
some of the quick-win parks, which could be developed with minimal intervention that can attract good
number of citizens)
Cuttack municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks such as name of the park, area, O&M
costs and brief description about the parks apart from this they identified few parks for renovation which can attract a
lot of people to use the parks and enhancing children friendly features identified by the municipality will make tem
quick-win parks.

Question: How is the physical condition of parks in the city? Do they have boundary wall, fenced area,
facilities of public conveniences, tube well, dustbins etc. (Mention in proportions, if possible)
Park in Cuttack municipality are in good physical condition overall , Most of the Housing area parks in Cuttack need
renovations for lack of toilet facility and park furniture is not in a good shape .

Question: Whether parks have well planned play area encouraging physical activity? Are they equipped
with child friendly play equipment, snack/ ice cream parlors/ kiosks etc. (Mention in proportions, if
possible?)
Parks maintained under CDAhas child friendly equipment and the housing area parks under BMC lack Child
Friendly Equipment, Snack/ ice cream parlors/ kiosks need to be established.

Question: How well aesthetics component have been built in parks of your city? Are they well
illuminated, landscaped – manicured with waterbodies/ fountains etc. wherever possible? (Mention
proportions, if possible)
Parks in Cuttack municipality are in decentaesthetic condition overall, nevertheless Housing area parkshas
shortageoflandscape and park furniture is not in a good shape and Child friendly Equipment.
Question: Are there some running schemes/ projects – Central/ State/ Donor funded in the city as
regard development of parks/ open spaces? Or else ULB is funding park development of parks/ green
space out of its own budget?
Development of open spaces, green spaces and parks in Cuttack are done with the help of state government and
maintenance of the parks is covered by the municipal fund.
Question: Explain the process how a park/ open space is normally shortlisted for development? Does
the city have rationale for park selection for development or it is done on ad-hoc basis.
Cuttack municipality shortlists the parks/open spaces in a unique process as follows
1. Identification of government lands in the city
2. Gap analysis based on the existing parks coverage
3. Initial prioritization based on the size and coverage of the park
4. Stakeholder consultation by the municipal engineers
5. Citizen consultation and enlightening them with the facts
6. Finally considering all the above aspects the chairperson and counsellors shortlists parks for
development
Question: List the organizations/ authorities/ private sector firms etc. and describe their roles and
responsibilities in development of city parks/ open space along with green area under their jurisdiction.
NO Private sector firms /organizationsis involved in the development or maintenance of a park in the city. All the
parks are under the municipal authority and Development authorityare operated and maintained.
Question: Where can new parks be developed in the future; how much space may be available.
Cuttackmunicipalityhas identified few government lands in the municipal jurisdiction where there is a need for
parks but the land is under the state body which has to be transferred to the municipality so that they can plan
and execute the projects.
Question: How much is allocated under Parks/ Open/ Recreational space as per the DP or Master Plan
for new areas?
DP which provide the landuse 0.98% and stating that green spaces have to be developed in the city but there is
no allocated under Parks/ Open/ Recreational space as per the DP or Master Plan for new areas.
Question: Who manages the parks in the city? How much delegation of responsibility has been given to
RWAs and/or NGOs?
Parks are undertaken by the municipality, development authority and a Private Organisation, no NGO’s
delegation of responsibility has been given.
Question: Which parks have uneasy accessibility issues or get flooded/water logged etc.?
All the existing parks are easy to access and there is no such problem of flooding/water logging etc transpired in
the parks.
Question: Does the ULB have any guidelines for providing safe and secure access to parks for children
and elders?
Private architects are hired for designing the parks and then the plans are reviewed by the internal technical
experts with regard to safety, security and universal accessibility measures taken in the design and then finalize
the plan for execution which makes parks in Cuttack safe and secure for all age groups.
Question: Is there a system for preventing the entry of animals into parks?
Existing parks in the CUTTACK municipality are with the boundary wall so there is not even a single event
occurred in the past few years that the animals entering the parks.
Question: Does the city have any guidelines for horticulture; types of trees and plants, etc?
City has not specifically followed any guidelines for horticulture or selecting type of trees or plants .the plan
given by the landscape architect is followed and implemented on field because of shortage if capacity in that
sector.
Table2:Jurisdiction wise–Allocation of Green space and Parks
Sr.No Jurisdiction No. of Parks Area of Parks (in hec) Proportion (%)

1 ULB 36 15.6 71.3

2 Development Authority 4 6.3 28.7

Private Ownership Corporate/NGO's

3 0
Total 40 100 100

Table3: Hierarchy of Organized Greens in the City (As per URDPFI - 2014)
Area under the % Area under parks
Sr. No Category No. of Parks
category (in hec) and open spaces

1 Housing Area Park (HAP) (Less than 5000 Sq.m.) 30 5.2 25.8

2 Neighbourhood Park (NP)(5000 -10000 sq.m.) 3 0.1 0.5

3 Community Park (CP) (10000 - 50000 sq.m 7 11.5 57.8

District Park (DP)
4 1 3.2 15.8
(50000 – 250000 Sq.m.)

5 Sub-City Park (SCP) (2,50,000 sq.m. & above ) 40 20 100

2. Bridge the Gap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, list out initiatives undertaken in different
ongoing programs/ projects/ master – development plans to address these gaps. While bridging the gaps
convergence with other ongoing Central, State and Local Government Programs/ Schemes will also be looked
into. Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.3, Annexure-
2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of physical assessment of
parks using “Assessment Tools for Parks” (Refer Annex-1 of this document) and meeting the opportunity to
bridge the gap.

As per para 5.1 (Sr.No.6) of AMRUT guidelines all projects involving development of green spaces & parks
shall have to make special provision for child friendly components and establish a system of maintenance with
local residents participation. At least one park from each of the 500 ULBs under AMRUT would be taken up for
developing facilities for Children, Youth and Elderly.

Assessment of the current status of City parks/ open spaces would clearly bring out the gap/ dearth of open
spaces in terms of area allocation, having inadequate citizen friendly features and issues pertaining to its
maintenance. And these will lead to formulation of three broad objectives.

Please respond to the following questions in not more than 500 words
Question: Have the city took physical assessment of city parks? (ULB’s may refer Annex-1 indicative
procurement of this document)

Question: Estimate the demand gap of open/green space in the city.

The demand gap of the city is about 2698.8 hectares as per URDPFI Guidelines

Question: Explain how the city plans to fill the gap in green cover and progressively enhance green
cover within City to 15% over next 5 years. ?
Cuttack municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks and decided to construct a park every
year and renovate the existing facilities so that they can fill the gap in green cover and within next decade green
cover in the city will be close to 15 %.
Question: Assess and describe, if requisite provisions as per Master Plan and other
State legislation have already been made?
Yes
Question: Explain the city’s action plans to make special provisions for installing child friendly
components in the city parks as per AMRUT Guidelines. ?
All the parks under CDAhas Child Friendly Equipment and ParksUnderCuttack municipality lacks with
childfriendly components.
Question: Provide details of the initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to
address the gaps in enhancing the green cover and rejuvenation/ development of parks. Provide
information in Table 4.
There are no ongoing projects in this sector as the city is concerned
Tabel4: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned/ Committed Projects
Name of the Month of Status (as on dd mm
Sr. No. Scheme Name Cost in Rs. Lakhs
Project Completion 2015)

OBJECTIVES

Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps. While developing objectives following
question shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate objective.

Question: Please provide a set of 2-3 objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.
1. Installation of child friendly equipment
2. Image of wild life to be conserved
3. Urban greenery in prioritization through plantation on both sides of all pivot routes
4. Identification of huge vacant lands in the city to build parks
3. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost

Suggest alternatives/ options to complete the ongoing projects pertaining to developing parks and
green spaces. Identify quick-win parks and open space which can also have play area and associated
facilities for Children, Youth & Elderly. Also identify & describe the prevailing models of parks
development & maintenance in your city? Any new model your city wishes to adopt? (Word Limit: 200
Words)
City is trying to incorporate the industries surrounded by to take reasonability and develop parks as part of
corporate social responsibility to compensate the pollution created by tm in the city .these are in the stages of
discussion but under implementation
Table 4: Cost Estimates for Park Development
Sr. No. Component Rate Amount in Rs.
1 Boundary wall 3225 3295950
2 Jogging track 1100 15549272
3 Gate 200000 600000
4 fountain 250000 3000000
5 Toilet 200000 6000000
6 Gazebo 100000 1000000
7 Stone Pillars and Sculpture 30000 870000
8 Garden Bench/Sitting 10000 1760000
9 Lawn 150 601345
10 Shade loving foliage Plants 300 36600
11 Foliage and Flowering shrubs 500 64500
12 Gate Light 20000 1500000
13 Boundary Light 40000 2120000
14 Focus Light 15000 210000
15 sliders 250000 11500000
16 See-saw 250000 11750000
17 Swing 200000 8200000
Grand Total 68057667

As per AMRUT guidelines half of Rs. Cr. may be sought from Government of India under the scheme and
balance could be explored and converged from other sources like 14th Finance Commission, State Government
(Park Development Fund) and CSR Activities of Corporate Groups active in the City.
4. Citizen Engagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on the suggested
alternatives and innovations. Each alternative pertaining to development and maintenance models for parks will
be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB
will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (Refer AMRUT Guidelines;
Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please explain following questions detailing out the needs, aspirations and wishes of the
local people. (Word Limit: 250 Words)
Question: Has all relevant stakeholders groups been involved in the consultation?
Private architects are hired for designing the parks and then the plans are reviewed by the internal technical
experts and then the discussions are carried out to the all relevant stakeholders groups
Question: Explore option for O&M Contracts including PPPP with (RWAs/ Citizens Groups/ Corporate
Groups – CSR, Selling advertisement rights etc.).
City is trying to incorporate the industries surrounded by to take reasonability and develop parks as part of
corporate social responsibility to compensate the pollution created by tm in the city .these are in the stages of
discussion but under implementation
Question: Explain how the city plans to establish a system of maintenance with active citizen’s
engagement as per AMRUT Guidelines.

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city

Ward level consultations are done after the stakeholder consultation and they are used for prioritization of the
projects
Question: Has alternatives explored are crowd sourced?
No
Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?
3 times consultation programs were held under the chairmanship of collector Cuttack for development of
Cuttack town all the feedbacks and suggestions are considered in planning the parks
Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?
No it is not done based on consultation initially, all the technical aspects are considered by engineers & the
chair person
Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?
Cuttack municipality prioritizes the parks/open spaces in an exclusive process as follows
1. Gap analysis based on the existing parks coverage
2. Initial prioritization based on the size and coverage of the park
3. Citizen consultation and enlightening them with the facts and ask their priorities
4. Finally considering all the above aspects the chairperson and counsellors prioritizes parks for
development
5. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on the available
resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please reply following questions (Word
Limit: 100 Words)
Question: What are the sources of funds?
The funds are divided into three parts
1. Construction of parks 50% from AMRUT(GOI)
2. Construction of parks 50% from STATE GOVERNMENT
3. O&M cost by ULB 100%
Question: Has projects been converged with other program and scheme
No
Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?
YES the projects undertaken are prioritized based on “more with less” approach in such a way that we spend
less money and coverage is more
6. Conditionalities

1.1 Describe the Conditionality’s of each project in terms of availability of land, environmental & social
obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval and permission needed to
implement the project. Required approvals will be sought from competent authority and organizations.
(Word Limit: 100 words)
Cuttack municipality has identified few government lands in the municipal jurisdiction where there is a need for
parks but the land is under the state body which has to be transferred to the municipality so that they can plan
and execute the projects if provided funds on time by the state & central government, and approval of DPR by
the apex committee
7. Resilience

The resilience factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable, safe and secured park
development schemes. Ensure use of rust free sturdy steel structures for child and elderly friendly features.
(Word Limit: 100 words)
Plans are reviewed by the internal technical experts with regard to safety, security and universal accessibility
measures taken in the design and then finalize the plan for execution which makes parks in Cuttack safe and
secure for all age groups. And the materials used considering there sustainability in mind

8. Financial Plan
Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of capital cost and
O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on the investment requirements, different
sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development
will be prepared. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 4, 6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include percentage
share of different stakeholders (Centre, State and City) including financial convergence with various ongoing
projects. While preparing finance plan please reply following questions (Word Limit: 100 words)

 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating
infrastructure projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 List of individual project which is being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50%
state grant. The list may be seen in Table ___.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence and
consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered under
other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned for
projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on
50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultation
for involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.
  Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has been
categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contribute
required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will be
met from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have been
categorized based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUT
scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of both CAPEX and OPEX costs to ensure sustenance
throughout the life cycle of all projects identified in SLIP.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,
ULBs and)?
Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes financial and physical convergence with various ongoing projects under
different schemes supported by both Central & State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 and 2.11. These tables are based on
AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

MASTER SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS DURING MISSION PERIOD

(Asper Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)

(Amount in Rs. Cr)
Sr. Physical Estimated
Project Name Existing After
No. Components Indicator Cost (Cr)
(As-Is) (To-be)
Construction of Park in Cuttack near Mouzainam Park -
0.44
1 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/01
Development of Chandan Pokhari Park in Cuttack -
0.84
2 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/02
Development of Chahata Park in Cuttack -
0.62
3 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/03
Development of Akhaya mohanty Park in Cuttack -
0.33
4 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/04
Development of Biswanath Pandit Park in Cuttack -
0.42
5 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/05
Development of Buruia Park in Cuttack -
0.40
6 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/06
Development of Mahatab Nagar Park in Cuttack -
0.31
7 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/07
Development of Netaji Birth Place Park in Cuttack -
0.31
8 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/08
Development of Madhukunia Park in Cuttack -
0.59
9 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/09
 Development of Sahed Park in Cuttack -
10 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/10 0.22
Development of Gandhi Smriti Udayan in Cuttack -
11 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/11 0.21
Development of Rajbagicha Park in Cuttack -
12 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/12 0.21
Development of Dasarapur Park in Cuttack -
13 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/13 0.11
Development of Sarangdhar Park in Cuttack -
14 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/14 0.11
Development of Saptadara Park in Cuttack -
15 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/15 0.11
Development of Gurudwar Park in Cuttack -
16 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/16 0.11
Development of Parala Maharaja Park in Cuttack -
17 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/17 0.11
Development of Linikonia Bagicha Park in Cuttack -
18 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/18 0.11
Development of Sheltu Chhalu Park in Cuttack -
19 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/19 0.11
Development of Biren Mitra Park in Cuttack -
20 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/20 0.10
21 Anand Bhavan Park in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/21 0.19
Development of Saheed Bhavan Park in Cuttack -
22 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/22 0.11
Development of Madhusudan Park in Cuttack -
23 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/23 0.11
Development of B.R Ambedkar Park in Cuttack -
24 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/24 0.11
Development of Potapokhari Park in Cuttack -
25 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/25 0.11
Development of KauikaChhaka Park in Cuttack -
26 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/26 0.11
Development of BaDevelopmentige Colony Park in Cuttack -
27 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/27 0.11
Development of Gadabadia Park in Cuttack -
28 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/28 0.11
Development of Behera Colony Park in Cuttack -
29 AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/29 0.11

ANNUAL FUND SHARING PATTERN FOR PARKS AND GREEN SPACE PROJECTS
(As per Table 2.3.1 of AMRUT guidelines)
(Amount in Rs. Cr)

Sr. Total Project

Name of the Project Total
No. Cost (Cr) GOI State ULB Others
(in Cr)
Construction of Park in Cuttack
1 nearMouzainam Park - 0.44 0.22 0.22 0.44
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/01
Development of Chandan Pokhari Park in
2 0.84 0.42 0.42 0.84
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/02
Development of Chahata Park in Cuttack -
3 0.62 0.31 0.31 0.62
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/03
Development of Akhayamohanty Park in
4 0.33 0.16 0.16 0.33
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/04
Development of BiswanathPandit Park in
5 0.42 0.21 0.21 0.42
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/05
 Development of Buruia Park in Cuttack -
6 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.40
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/06
Development of Mahatab Nagar Park in
7 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.31
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/07
Development of Netaji Birth Place Park in
8 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.31
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/08
Development of Madhukunia Park in Cuttack -
9 0.59 0.29 0.29 0.59
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/09
Development of Sahed Park in Cuttack -
10 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.22
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/10
Development of Gandhi Smriti Udayan in
11 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.21
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/11
Development of Rajbagicha Park in Cuttack -
12 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.21
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/12
Development of Dasarapur Park in Cuttack -
13 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/13
Development of Sarangdhar Park in Cuttack -
14 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/14
Development of Saptadara Park in Cuttack -
15 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/15
Development of Gurudwar Park in Cuttack -
16 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/16
Development of Parala Maharaja Park in
17 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/17
Development of Linikonia Bagicha Park in
18 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/18
Development of Sheltu Chhalu Park in
19 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/19
Development of Biren Mitra Park in Cuttack -
20 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/20
Anand Bhavan Park in Cuttack -
21 0.19 0.10 0.10 0.19
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/21
Development of Saheed Bhavan Park in
22 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/22
Development of Madhusudan Park in Cuttack
23 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
- AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/23
Development of B.R Ambedkar Park in
24 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/24
Development of Potapokhari Park in Cuttack -
25 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/25
Development of KauikaChhaka Park in
26 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/26
Development of BaDevelopmentige Colony
27 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
Park in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/27
Development of Gadabadia Park in Cuttack -
28 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/28
Development of Behra Colony Park in Cuttack
29 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.11
- AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/29
 ANNUAL FUND SHARING BREAK_UP FOR PARKS and PLAY GROUND PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

State ULB
Sr.
Project GOI 14th 14th Convergence Others Total
No Others Total Others Total
Fc Fc
Construction of Park in Cuttack
1 near Mouzainam Park - 0.22 0.22 0.44
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/01
Development of Chandan Pokhari
2 Park in Cuttack - 0.42 0.42 0.84
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/02
Development of Chahata Park in
3 Cuttack - 0.31 0.31 0.62
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/03
Development of Akhaya mohanty
4 Park in Cuttack - 0.16 0.16 0.33
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/04
Development of Biswanath Pandit
5 Park in Cuttack - 0.21 0.21 0.42
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/05
Development of Buruia Park in
6 Cuttack - 0.20 0.20 0.40
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/06
Development of Mahatab Nagar
7 Park in Cuttack - 0.16 0.16 0.31
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/07
Development of Netaji Birth Place
8 Park in Cuttack - 0.16 0.16 0.31
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/08
Development of Madhukunia Park in
9 Cuttack - 0.29 0.29 0.59
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/09
Development of Sahed Park in
10 Cuttack - 0.11 0.11 0.22
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/10
Development of Gandhi Smriti
11 Udayan in Cuttack - 0.11 0.11 0.21
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/11
Development of Rajbagicha Park in
12 Cuttack - 0.11 0.11 0.21
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/12
Development of Dasarapur Park in
13 Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/13
Development of Sarangdhar Park in
14 Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/14
Development of Saptadara Park in
15 Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/15
Development of Gurudwar Park in
16 Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/16
Development of Parala Maharaja
17 Park in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/17
 Development of Linikonia Bagicha
18 Park in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/18
Development of Sheltu Chhalu Park
19 in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/19
Development of Biren Mitra Park in
20 Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.10
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/20
Anand Bhavan Park in Cuttack -
21 0.10 0.10 0.19
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/21
Development of Saheed Bhavan
22 Park in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/22
Development of Madhusudan Park
23 in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/23
Development of B.R Ambedkar
24 Park in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/24
Development of Potapokhari Park
25 in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/25
Development of Kauika Chhaka
26 Park in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/26
Development of BaDevelopmentige
27 Colony Park in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/27
Development of Gadabadia Park in
28 Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/28
Development of Behera Colony
29 Park in Cuttack - 0.05 0.05 0.11
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/29

YEAR WISE PLAN FOR SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Annual targets (Increments form the baseline value)

Project
Proposed Project Indicator Baseline FY 2016 FY
Cost FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
H1 H2 2017
Construction of Park in Cuttack near
Mouzainam Park - 0.44
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/01
Development of Chandan Pokhari Park
0.84
in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/02
Development of Chahata Park in
0.62
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/03
Development of Akhayamohanty Park
0.33
in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/04
Development of Biswanath Pandit Park
0.42
in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/05
Development of Buruia Park in Cuttack
0.40
- AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/06
Development of Mahatab Nagar Park in
0.31
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/07
Development of Netaji Birth Place Park
0.31
in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/08
Development of Madhukunia Park in
0.59
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/09
Development of Sahed Park in Cuttack
0.22
- AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/10
Development of Gandhi Smriti Udayan
0.21
in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/11
Development of Rajbagicha Park in
0.21
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/12
Development of Dasarapur Park in
0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/13
Development of Sarangdhar Park in
0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/14
Development of Saptadara Park in
0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/15
Development of Gurudwar Park in
0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/16
Development of Parala Maharaja Park
0.11
in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/17
Development of Linikonia Bagicha Park
0.11
in Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/18
Development of SheltuChhalu Park in
0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/19
Development of Biren Mitra Park in
0.10
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/20
Anand Bhavan Park in Cuttack -
0.19
AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/21
Development of Saheed Bhavan Park in
0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/22
Development of Madhusudan Park in
0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/23
Development of B.R Ambedkar Park in
0.11
Cuttack - AMRUT/OD/Cuttack/PR/24

Annex-1: Indicative Assessment Tools for Parks (Indicative – ULBs can have its own assessment tool as per
the requirement or customize this tool to suit its need)