Experimental Study On Ultimate Strength of Steel Tube Column Filled With Reactive Powder Concrete
Experimental Study On Ultimate Strength of Steel Tube Column Filled With Reactive Powder Concrete
org
Bahaa Al-Abbas 1, Zainab M.R. Abdul Rasoul 1 , Dhafer Hasan 1, Sajjad E. Rasheed 1*
1
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kerbala, Kerbala, Iraq.
Received 23 January 2023; Revised 14 May 2023; Accepted 22 May 2023; Published 01 June 2023
Abstract
Composite concrete Filled Tubular Steel (CFT) members, which have excellent deformability due to the well-known
confined and constrained interaction between steel tube and concrete, have largely been utilized as bridge piers or columns
in high-rise buildings, resulting in increased strength and decreased column size. This study examined the experimental
performance of steel tube columns filled with reactive powder concrete (RPC) under axial compression. Three sets of
columns were used in the experiment, each with variations in shape (square, rectangular, and circular), length-to-diameter
ratio, and compressive strength of the RPC. The first set consisted of five columns, while the second and third sets each
had seven columns with three different lengths (750 mm, 600 mm, and 450 mm) and two different compressive strengths
(54 and 92 MPa). A new numerical model was developed to calculate the ultimate failure load of the columns by
considering factors such as the yield strength of steel, the compressive strength of concrete, the column shape, and the ratio
of concrete to steel. This model was validated by comparing the results obtained from the experiments to those predicted
by the model, as well as by designing equations from various codes. The results showed that the proposed numerical model
accurately predicted the ultimate failure load for columns filled with different types of concrete, especially for RPC, while
maintaining conservatism compared to the ACI, AISC, and EN codes equations.
Keywords: Steel Column; Hollow Section; Reactive Powder Concrete; Local Buckling; Lateral Displacement.
1. Introduction
Concrete-filled steel tubes (CFST) have grown in popularity in seismic zones in recent years. The composite effect
associated with these members, which is caused by the interaction between the steel tube and the concrete core, can
improve both the ductility and capacity of the member [1]. Many researchers have studied the behavior of steel tube
columns filled with normal concrete, such as Stephen et al. [2], Uenaka et al. [3], Yang & Han [4], Liao et al. [5], and
Almamoori et al. [6]. However, it appears that little attention has gone into studying the behavior of a composite member
subjected to axial compression with high or ultra-high-strength concrete. Experiments were carried out [7, 8] on
concentrically and eccentrically loaded circular, square, and rectangular CFST stub columns filled by high-strength self-
compacting concrete with a length-to-diameter (width) ratio of 3. The test findings revealed that there were substantial
variations between partially loaded CFST stub columns and the corresponding fully loaded composite columns due to
the presence of partially compressive forces. In recent years, structural engineers have been interested in the performance
of CFST under axial compression loads with different concrete types. However, design codes for composite columns
have not adequately addressed this issue. Moreover, the design formula was proposed by Uenaka et al. [3] based on the
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee C.E.J, Tehran, Iran. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
1344
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
yield strengths of the tubes and the filled concrete cylinder. In recent years, a novel group of concrete known as reactive
powder concrete (RPC) has recently gotten a lot of interest all over the world due to its superior mechanical properties,
such as high strength, high ductility, high durability, low shrinkage, and high resistance to corrosion and abrasion. Many
researchers have been studying the properties of RPC, such as Hassooni & Al-Zaidee [9] and Muteb & Hasan [10]. The
authors showed that the increase in steel fiber improves the compressive and rupture stresses of the developed concrete.
Other researchers studied the effect of RPC or UHPC on the behavior of composite sections, such as Luo et al. [11],
Hoang et al. [12], and Mi et al. [13]. Based on their results, the strength and hoop coefficient of the developed column
increased due to the growth in the ultimate strength of the RPC core, which highlighted an improvement in the ductility
of developed columns. Limit studies on the behavior of steel tube columns filled with RPC under axial compression
utilizing various cross-sections can be seen in the above preview. As a result, the focus of this work is on utilizing RPC
to experimentally and analytically investigate the CFST's performance.
2. Experimental Program
2.1. General Description
The behavior of CFST using RPC while exposed to concentric axial compression stress was investigated using
nineteen steel columns in this study. High-quality steel with a yield stress of 363 MPa was employed in this research.
The details of the test columns are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1.
S10 750 10 2 -
S10-54 750 10 2 54
S6-54 450 6 2 54
S6-92 450 6 2 92
R10 750 10 2 -
R10-54 750 10 2 54
R10-92 750 10 2 92
R8-92 600 8 2 92
R6-54 450 6 2 54
R6-92 450 6 2 92
C10 750 10 2 -
C10-54 750 10 2 54
C10-92 750 10 2 92
C8-92 600 8 2 92
C6-54 450 6 2 54
C6-92 450 6 2 92
1345
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
Configuration of Steel
Specimens
Mix Design
Test Specimens
Tests in Hardened State for Two Mixes Test CFST Specimens New Model Suggestion
Compressive Strength
(MPa) Modes of Failure Load-Deflection Curves Lateral Displacement
Conclusions
2.2. Materials
A CRESTA 42.5R cement was used in this study. This type of Portland Limestone cement agrees to ASTM
C150/C150M–22 [14]. Locally available fine sand with a maximum particle size of 600μm (0.6mm) was used to produce
the RPC. Fine aggregate testing was carried out in accordance with [15]. Master Glenium 51's commercial brands of
additive (superplasticizer) were used. It’s a non-hazardous third-generation superplasticizer produced by BASF–The
Chemical Company. The steel fibers used in this study were straight steel wire, which has an aspect ratio (length to
diameter) of about 59. ConMix Company's microsilica fume was employed as a mineral additive in the combination.
Based on earlier research done by Muteb and Hasan [10], the mixes were employed to achieve maximum compressive
strength after trial mixes. The details of the mixes are shown in Table 2. Following that, all specimens were cast and
cured inside curing tanks at 60 Co for twenty-eight days.
Table 2. Concrete mixture proportions
3 3
Mix Cement kg/(m) Sand kg/(m) S.F* kg/(m)3 w/C** super plasticizer, L/m3 Steel Fiber % Steel Fiber kg/m3
M54*** 900 1050 100 0.20 45 0% 0
M92**** 900 1050 100 0.20 45 1.5% 117.75
*S.F: silica fume, **W/C: water to cementitious (cement + silica fume) ratio, ***M54: mix with compressive strength 54 MPa, ****M92: mix with compressive
strength 92 MPa.
1346
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
stiff, thick plate (20 mm). The plate is used to transfer the axial load from the machine to the column. Three Linear
Variation Displacement Transducers (LVDT) sensors with a 0.001 precision were used. The first one records the axial
deformation, while the second measures the lateral deformation of the developed CSFT columns, as shown in Figure 2.
When each tested column's resistance decreased (the loading curve levelled), the loading was terminated.
1347
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
350 600
300
500
250
Load (kN)
400
200 Load (kN)
300
150
R10 R10
200
100 R10-54 R10-92
50 R8-54 100 R8-92
R6-54 R6-92
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Vertical Displacement (mm) Vertical Displacement (mm)
500 700
450
600
400
350 500
300
Load (kN)
400
Load (kN)
250
200 300
150 S10 S10
200
100 S10-54 S8-92
S6-54
100 S6-92
50
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Vertical Displacement (mm) Vertical Displacement (mm)
700 700
C10
600 C10-54 600
C6-54
Load (kN)
400 400
300 300
C10
200 200 C10-92
C8-92
100 100
C6-92
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Vertical Displacement (mm) Vertical Displacement (mm)
1348
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
700 700
S10
600 S10-54 600
R10
500 R10-54 500
Load (kN)
C10
load (kN)
400 400
C10-54
300 300 S10
R10
200 200 R10-92
100 100 C10
C10-92
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Vertical Displacement (mm) Vertical Displacement (mm)
700 700
S10
600 S6-54 600
R10
500 R6-54 500
Load (kN)
Load (kN)
C10
400 400
C6-54
300 S10
300
S6-92
200 200 R10
R6-92
100 100 C10
0 C6-92
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Vertical Displacement (mm) Vertical Displacement (mm)
1349
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
700
600
500
Load (kN)
400
S10
300 S8-92
R10
200
R8-92
100 C10
C8-92
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Vertical Displacement (mm)
700 700
600 600
500 500
Load (kN)
Load (kN)
400 400
300 300
S8-92
S10-54
200 S6-54
200 S6-54
S6-92
100 S6-92
100
0 0
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -2 -1 0 1 2
X-Displacement (mm) Y- Displacement (mm)
500 500
400 400
Load (kN)
Load (kN)
300 300
R8-54
200 200
R8-92 R10-54
100 R6-54
100 R6-54
R6-92 R6-92
0 0
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 -2 -1 0 1 2
X-Displacement (mm) Y- Displacement (mm)
1350
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
700 700
600 600
500 500
Load (kN)
400 400
Load (kN)
C10-54 C10-54
300 300
C8-54 C8-54
(c) circular
1351
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
The model developed in this research to predict the compressive load of concrete-filled tubular steel column is as
follows:
where 𝑃𝑢 is the ultimate axial load, 𝛽 is the shape factor, 𝑘1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑘2 are variables coefficients.
Regression analysis was done to estimate the impact of each parameter on the performance of the developed model
with a coefficient of determination (R2) equal to 0.982 and the resulted values are:
0.95 steel tube
0.68 composit rectangular tube
β={ } (6)
1.05 composit square tube
1.36 composit circular tube
Table 4 shows the difference between the experimental and theoretical results for all columns. It can be seen that the
results of failure load for EN code are higher than the results of AISC and ACI code. Comparing the results of the current
research with the results from the aforementioned codes, this study's proposed equation offers a better prediction of the
compressive strength than the prediction offered by the codes equations when used to predict the compressive strength
for square and circular cross-section. However, this study equation offers a less accurate prediction of the compressive
strength for rectangular cross-sections columns compared to different codes equations. It can be concluded from these
results that the effect of the cross-section of the column on its performance was clear. The suggested equation, based on
R2, was able to predict 98% of the change in compressive strength depending on the factors employed.
1352
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
Figure 10-a shows the normal probability plot of the residuals which verifies the assumption of the normal
distribution of the residuals. The normal probability plot of the residuals generally follows a straight line. There is no
evidence of abnormality, outliers, or unidentified variables. The residuals versus fits plot are used to confirm that the
residuals are distributed randomly and have a constant variance. Ideally, the points would fall randomly on both sides
of zero, with no discernible patterns. The data appears to be scattered randomly about zero. There is no indication that
the residual value is influenced by the fitted values as seen in Figure 10-b. The residuals are not related to one another,
as seen in Figure (10-d). When displayed in time order, independent residuals show no trends or patterns. Patterns in the
points might suggest that residuals that are near each other are associated and hence are not independent. The residuals
should appear to fall randomly around the centreline.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 10. The Results of Statistical Analysis
4. Conclusion
This study has investigated the performance of steel tube columns filled with reactive powder concrete (RPC) under
axial compression with different cross sections. The collected test data from nineteen specimens was analyzed and
compared with previous studies and design codes. The following conclusions can be drawn from the present study.
Due to the high compressive strength and presence of steel fiber, the composite effect caused by the interaction
between the steel tube and the concrete core can improve both the ductility and capacity of the member. On the other
hand, the failure mode of the columns filled with RPC differs from that of the columns filled with normal concrete. As
a result, local buckling and local yielding appeared at the ends of the column due to some stress concentration at these
locations. The behavior of the columns in terms of load-vertical displacement is stiffer with the increase in compressive
strength due to the use of RPC with micro-steel fiber. The maximum ratios of increase in displacement resistance with
increase in compressive strength were 62.5%, 54%, and 16.5% for square, rectangular, and circular columns,
respectively. Also, with respect to the effect of shape, circular columns have a better vertical displacement compared
with other shapes, as the displacement resistance increased by 28.5% and 20% for rectangular and square columns,
respectively. While the lateral displacement was unaffected by the compressive strength or shape of the columns, this is
attributed to the confinement effect. In addition to these main findings in the part of experimental results, there are some
concluded remarks about the theoretically proposed equation, which, despite its limitations to pinned boundary
1353
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
conditions and concentrated axial load. Furthermore, it provided an accurate prediction while remaining conservative
compared with the underestimated results offered by the ACI, AISC, and EN codes equations. In details, the
enhancement of concrete capacity within the section represented by the parameter k2 converges the results of the
proposed equation with the values obtained from the experimental test, and the shape factor β is very sensitive and
affects the ultimate capacity of the CFST column.
5. Nomenclature
RPC Reactive Powder Concrete LVDT Linear Variation Displacement Transducers
CFST Concrete-filled steel tubes Pu Ultimate axial load
β Shape Factor k1, k2 Variable coefficients
FE Finite Element ACI American Concrete Institute
OPC Ordinary Portland cement AISC American Institute of Steel Construction
UHPC Ultra-High-Performance Concrete EN European Standard
6. Declarations
6.1. Author Contributions
Conceptualization, B.A. and D.H.; methodology, B.A. and D.H.; software, B.A. and S.E.R.; validation, B.A. and
Z.M.R.A.; formal analysis, B.A. and Z.M.R.A.; investigation, B.A. and D.H.; resources, B.A. and Z.M.R.A.; data
curation, B.A. and D.H.; writing—original draft preparation, B.A. and Z.M.R.A.; writing—review and editing, B.A. and
S.E.R.; visualization, B.A. and S.E.R.; supervision, B.A. and D.H.; project administration, B.A.; funding acquisition,
B.A. and D.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
6.3. Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
7. References
[1] Jiang, Y., Silva, A., Macedo, L., Castro, J. M., Monteiro, R., & Chan, T. M. (2019). Concentrated-plasticity modelling of circular
concrete-filled steel tubular members under flexure. Structures, 21, 156–166. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2019.01.023.
[2] Schneider, S. P., Kramer, D. R., & Sarkkinen, D. L. (2004). The design and construction of concrete-filled steel tube column
frames. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1-6 August, 2004, Vancouver, Canada.
[3] Uenaka, K., Kitoh, H., & Sonoda, K. (2010). Concrete filled double skin circular stub columns under compression. Thin-Walled
Structures, 48(1), 19–24. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2009.08.001.
[4] Yang, Y. F., & Han, L. H. (2012). Concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns subjected to concentrically partial compression.
Thin-Walled Structures, 50(1), 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2011.09.007.
[5] Liao, F. Y., Hou, C., Zhang, W. J., & Ren, J. (2019). Experimental investigation on sea sand concrete-filled stainless steel tubular
stub columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 155, 46–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.12.009.
[6] Almamoori, A. H. N., Naser, F. H., & Dhahir, M. K. (2020). Effect of section shape on the behaviour of thin walled steel columns
filled with light weight aggregate concrete: Experimental investigation. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13.
doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00356.
[7] Han, L. H., Liu, W., & Yang, Y. F. (2008). Behaviour of concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns subjected to axially local
compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64(4), 377–387. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.10.002.
[8] Yang, Y. F., & Han, L. H. (2011). Behaviour of concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) stub columns under eccentric partial
compression. Thin-Walled Structures, 49(2), 379–395. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2010.09.024.
[9] Hassooni, A. N., & Al-Zaidee, S. R. (2022). Rehabilitation of Composite Column Subjected to Axial Load. Civil Engineering
Journal, 8(3), 595-611. doi:10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-03-013.
1354
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 9, No. 06, June, 2023
[10] Muteb, H. H., & Hasan, D. M. (2020). Ultra-high-performance concrete using local materials and production methods. IOP
Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 870, 012100. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/870/1/012100.
[11] Luo, H., Wang, W., Shen, L., & Wang, G. (2017). Stress-strain model for reactive powder concrete confined by steel tube.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 10(2), 122–131. doi:10.25103/jestr.102.15.
[12] Hoang, A. Le, Fehling, E., Lai, B., Thai, D. K., & Chau, N. Van. (2019). Experimental study on structural performance of UHPC
and UHPFRC columns confined with steel tube. Engineering Structures, 187, 457–477. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.063.
[13] Mi, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, W., Yang, Y., & Wu, C. (2020). Experimental study on residual axial bearing capacity of UHPFRC-filled
steel tubes after lateral impact loading. Structures, 26, 549–561. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.032.
[14] ASTM C150/C150M-22. (2022). Standard Specification for Portland Cement. ASTM International, Pennsylvania, United States.
doi:10.1520/C0150_C0150M-22.
[15] Iraqi Specifications No.45. (1984). Aggregates of Natural Resources used for Concrete and Construction. Iraqi Specifications,
Baghdad, Iraq.
[16] ANSI/AISC 360-22. (2022). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Illinois,
United States.
[17] Eurocode 4. (2014). Design of composite steel and concrete structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels,
Belgium. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41714-6_51757.
[18] ACI 318. (1994). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute (ACI),
Michigan, United States.
1355