Daily One Guess Essay For CSS Exam 2026
Date: 16 July 2025,Group Fee:250
For Daily Dawn Newspaper Group:03229117651
By Numan Khan
Essay Title:
The Future of Mankind in a Global Warming Perspective
Topic Statement:
Climate change threatens human survival, demanding urgent global action to prevent
catastrophic consequences.
Outlines:
1. The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change and Its Projected Impacts
2. Socioeconomic Consequences: Inequality, Migration, and Resource Wars
3. Technological and Policy Solutions: Renewable Energy, Carbon Capture, and
International Agreements
4. The Role of Corporations and Governments in Climate Inaction
5. Ethical Considerations: Intergenerational Justice and Ecological Responsibility
6. A Call for Immediate Action: Individual, National, and Global Responses
Essay
The Earth’s climate is undergoing unprecedented changes due to human activity,
primarily the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial agriculture. The
scientific consensus, as outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC), is unequivocal: global temperatures are rising at an alarming rate, with 2023
being the hottest year on record. If current emission trends continue, the planet is on
track to warm by 2.7°C to 3.5°C by 2100—a scenario that would render large parts of
the world uninhabitable. Rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and ecosystem
collapse are no longer distant threats but present realities. Coastal cities from Miami to
Mumbai face submersion, while heatwaves, wildfires, and hurricanes grow more
frequent and severe. The Arctic is melting at an accelerating pace, disrupting global
weather patterns and releasing trapped methane—a greenhouse gas 25 times more
potent than CO₂. The window to limit warming to 1.5°C, as stipulated by the Paris
Agreement, is rapidly closing, and without drastic intervention, the consequences will
be irreversible.
The socioeconomic ramifications of climate change will exacerbate existing
inequalities, triggering mass displacement and geopolitical instability. Low-lying
nations like Bangladesh and the Maldives risk complete inundation, displacing
millions of climate refugees. Droughts in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia will
devastate agriculture, leading to food shortages and price surges. The World Bank
estimates that by 2050, over 140 million people could be displaced internally due to
climate-related disasters. Wealthier nations, while better equipped to adapt, will not
remain immune. Rising temperatures will strain energy grids, reduce labor
productivity, and increase healthcare costs due to heat-related illnesses and vector-
borne diseases. Meanwhile, competition over dwindling resources—such as freshwater
and arable land—could spark conflicts, turning climate change into a catalyst for war.
The Syrian civil war, partially triggered by a prolonged drought, serves as a grim
precursor of what may come. The global poor, who contribute least to emissions, will
suffer the most, highlighting the profound injustice embedded in climate change.
Technological innovation and policy reforms offer a pathway to mitigation, though
their implementation remains inconsistent. Renewable energy—solar, wind, and
hydropower—has become cheaper and more efficient, yet fossil fuels still dominate
global energy production. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, while
promising, are not yet scalable enough to make a significant impact. International
agreements like the Paris Accord provide a framework for emission reductions, but
enforcement mechanisms are weak, and many nations fail to meet their pledges. The
recent COP28 summit saw contentious debates over phasing out fossil fuels, with oil-
producing nations resisting binding commitments. Meanwhile, geoengineering
proposals—such as solar radiation management—present ethical dilemmas, as
tampering with Earth’s systems could have unintended consequences. A just transition
to a green economy requires not only technological advances but also systemic
changes in consumption patterns, industrial practices, and corporate accountability.
Despite overwhelming evidence, corporate greed and political short-sightedness
continue to obstruct meaningful climate action. The fossil fuel industry, backed by
trillion-dollar subsidies, spends millions on lobbying and misinformation campaigns to
delay regulations. Governments, particularly in the U.S. and China, prioritize
economic growth over sustainability, approving new coal plants and oil drilling
projects. Even in democracies, climate policies are often diluted to appease corporate
donors and voter bases resistant to change. The recent rollback of environmental
protections in Brazil under Bolsonaro and the U.S. under Trump demonstrate how
quickly progress can be undone. Meanwhile, greenwashing—where companies falsely
advertise their sustainability—misleads consumers into believing that incremental
changes are sufficient. The disconnect between scientific urgency and political inertia
underscores a fundamental crisis of governance, where short-term profits outweigh
long-term survival.
Beyond economics and politics, climate change poses profound ethical questions about
humanity’s relationship with nature and future generations. The principle of
intergenerational justice demands that current societies do not compromise the well-
being of those yet unborn. Indigenous communities, who have sustainably managed
ecosystems for centuries, offer models of coexistence that industrialized nations have
ignored. The moral imperative to act is clear: allowing biodiversity loss, ocean
acidification, and atmospheric degradation to continue is tantamount to ecological
genocide. Philosophers like Hans Jonas argue for an "ethics of responsibility," where
humanity’s power to alter the planet necessitates restraint. Religious and secular
ethical frameworks alike call for stewardship rather than exploitation, yet
anthropocentrism—the belief that humans are the center of existence—continues to
drive destructive behavior. Reconciling economic systems with ecological limits
requires a paradigm shift, valuing sustainability over endless growth.
The urgency of the climate crisis demands immediate, coordinated action at all levels.
Individuals can reduce their carbon footprints through dietary changes (e.g., plant-
based diets), energy conservation, and sustainable consumption. However, systemic
change requires policy interventions: carbon pricing, fossil fuel divestment, and
massive investments in green infrastructure. Nations must honor and exceed their Paris
Agreement commitments, with wealthier countries financing adaptation and mitigation
in the Global South. Grassroots movements, from Extinction Rebellion to Fridays for
Future, play a crucial role in pressuring governments and corporations. The
alternative—business as usual—guarantees catastrophe. The future of mankind hinges
on whether societies can transcend nationalism, capitalism, and apathy to forge a
collective response. The stakes could not be higher: without decisive action, the next
century may witness the collapse of civilizations. The choice is between a sustainable
future or an uninhabitable planet—and time is running out.
References:
1. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (2023) – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change.
2. World Bank Groundswell Report (2021) – Projections on climate migration.
3. "The Uninhabitable Earth" (2019) – David Wallace-Wells.
4. "This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate" (2014) – Naomi
Klein.
5. "The Ethics of Responsibility" (1984) – Hans Jonas.
6. COP28 Summit Key Findings (2023) – United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change.
7. "Braiding Sweetgrass" (2013) – Robin Wall Kimmerer (Indigenous ecological
wisdom).
8. International Energy Agency (IEA) Renewables Report (2023).
9. "The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable" (2016) –
Amitav Ghosh.
10.Scientific studies on Arctic methane release – Nature Climate Change (2022).
