IA 15/2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramkrishna
(FIR No. RC2162018A0011 (RC AC1 2018 A0011)
CNR No. DLCT11-000236-2022)
CC no. 28/2022
29.01.2025
Fresh application moved on behalf of A-6 Vikas Goenka seeking
release of passport for verification process in renewal of passport
of applicant’s daughter has been assigned to this court by order of
Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, CBI,
PC Act, RADC, New Delhi. It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh. Anurag Modi, Ld. Officiating Special PP for CBI.
Ms. Romila, Ld. Counsel for A-6.
Copy of application given to Ld. PP for CBI who seeks
some time to file reply.
To come up for reply and arguments on 07.02.2025,
date already fixed. Digitally signed
by ANKIT
ANKIT SINGLA
SINGLA Date:
2025.01.30
10:02:24 +0530
(ANKIT SINGLA)
Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-02
Rouse Avenue District Court
New Delhi/29.01.2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramkrishna
(FIR No. RC2162018A0011 (RC AC1 2018 A0011)
U/s 120 B IPC r/w 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2) PC Act 1988
and substantive offences thereof
CNR No. DLCT11-000236-2022)
CC no. 28/2022
07.02.2025
(Present proceedings have been conducted on Hybrid Mode)
Present : Shri Raj Kamal, Ld. PP for CBI alongwith IO Dy. SP
Shri Pushpal Paul.
Shri Arshdeep Singh, Ld. Counsel for (A-1) Chitra
Ramkrishna has appeared through VC.
Ms. Arpita, proxy Cl. for (A-1) Chitra Ramkrishna.
Shri Aman Raj Gandhi, Ld. Counsel for (A-2) Anand
Subaramanian.
Shri Harshit Sethi, Ld. Counsel for (A-3) Sanjay
Gupta & (A-7) M/s OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. has
appeared through VC (Cisco Webex App).
Shri Sidharth Satija, Ld. counsel for (A-4) Aman
Kokrady.
Shri Tushar Anand, Ld. Counsel for (A-5) Abhilasha
Kukreja has appeared through VC.
Shri Ankur Sood, Ld. counsel for (A-6) Vikas Goenka
has appeared through VC.
(A-1) Chitra Ramkrishna, (A-2) Anand
Subaramanian, (A-3) Sanjay Gupta for self and for
(A-7) M/s OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd., (A-4) Aman
Kokrady, (A-5) Abhilasha Kukreja & (A-6) Vikas
Goenka have appeared through VC.
Contd ….
Reply filed on behalf of CBI to application U/s 207
Cr. P.C. moved on behalf of (A-7) M/s OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd.
wherein there is mention of one list of unrelied documents. It is
submitted by Ld. Counsel for A-7 that earlier also one list of
unrelied documents was filed and IO was directed to file
consolidated list of unrelied documents. IO submits that he will
do the needful on NDOH.
Out of several issues, there is one issue about digital
evidence and IO was supposed to file detailed reply but IO has
not filed any detailed reply. IO has stated that he has not filed
detailed reply because in the application moved on behalf of
accused, there is no mention of any specific file which was not
opening. To counter this submission of IO, ld. Counsel for A-4
has pointed out towards his application dated 15.02.2024 wherein
he had pointed out towards several files which he is unable to
open which falsify the claim of IO. Perusal of record reveals that
matter is lingering on for the same purpose and several dates
have been taken by IO to comply with the order of the court.
Perusal of record reveals that repeatedly vague replies have been
filed and needful has not been done by the IO.
On being questioned as to why he has made false
submission, IO has come up with several explanations. One of
the explanation he has made is that he gave solution to the
accused persons to provide their hard disk which was supplied by
CBI and CBI would get the file open and supply the same to the
accused persons.
At this stage IO submits that he would file detailed
reply and would co-operate with Ld. Counsels for accused
persons himself and if Ld. counsels do not respond to him, he
would send them mail in this regard.
Be put up for filing of detailed reply by IO on
22.03.2025. Long date is given at request of IO as he submits
that it will take time to prepare detailed reply.
Digitally signed
by ANKIT
ANKIT SINGLA
SINGLA Date:
2025.02.07
15:47:00 +0530
(ANKIT SINGLA)
Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-02
Rouse Avenue District Court
New Delhi/07.02.2025
IA No. 15/2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramkrishna
FIR No. RC2162018A0011 (RC ACI 2018 A0011)
CNR No. DLCT 11-000236-2022
CC No. 28/2022
07.02.2025
Present application has been moved on behalf of A-6 Vikas Goenka seeking
release of his passport.
Present: Sh. Raj Kamal, Ld. PP for CBI.
Shri Ankur Sood, Ld. Counsel for A-6 Vikas Goenka has
appeared through VC (Cisco Webex).
1 By way of present application, A-6 Vikas Goenka is seeking
release of his passport for submission as part of verification process during
renewal of passport No. U8858836 of his daughter namely Ms. Aanya
Goenka which is going to expire on 29.01.2025. It is submitted that
applicant’s daughter has successfully received admission in foreign
universities in USA. It is further submitted that applicant’s daughter had
applied for renewal of her passport with the office of Passport Seva Kendra,
Bengaluru. It is stated that the passport authorities have informed daughter of
the applicant that passport of applicant is required in order to renew the
passport of his daughter. Copy of the relevant documents are annexed with
the application as Annexure-A/1 & A/2. It is further submitted that bail was
granted to the applicant vide order dated 01.09.2023 and passport of the
applicant was surrendered before the court in compliance of bail order.
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramakrishna Page 1 of 2
2 Reply filed on behalf of CBI. It is stated by Ld. PP that
applicant has not submitted any document to support his claim that his
daughter has successfully received admission in various foreign universities.
3 It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for applicant that passport
authorities do examine and compare the original with the photocopy of the
passport.
4 Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for
applicant, it is ordered that passport of the applicant be released to him for a
period of one month so as to enable the applicant to renew the passport of his
daughter. Accused is further directed to furnish security in the form of
FDR/bank guarantee for a sum of Rs. 5 Lakhs (Five Lakhs only).
5 In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the application
is allowed. The applicant is directed to surrender his passport in court
immediately after renewal of passport of his daughter.
6 Copy of this order be given dasti to the accused/applicant and to
the CBI, as prayed. Digitally
signed by
ANKIT
ANKIT SINGLA
SINGLA Date:
2025.02.07
15:32:44
+0530
(ANKIT SINGLA)
SPECIAL JUDGE-02, CBI (PC ACT)
RADC, NEW DELHI/07.02.2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramakrishna Page 2 of 2
IA No. 15/2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramkrishna
FIR No. RC2162018A0011 (RC ACI 2018 A0011)
CNR No. DLCT 11-000236-2022
CC No. 28/2022
07.02.2025
Present application has been moved on behalf of A-6 Vikas Goenka seeking
release of his passport.
Present: Sh. Raj Kamal, Ld. PP for CBI.
Shri Ankur Sood, Ld. Counsel for A-6 Vikas Goenka has
appeared through VC (Cisco Webex).
1 By way of present application, A-6 Vikas Goenka is seeking
release of his passport for submission as part of verification process during
renewal of passport No. U8858836 of his daughter namely Ms. Aanya
Goenka which is going to expire on 29.01.2025. It is submitted that
applicant’s daughter has successfully received admission in foreign
universities in USA. It is further submitted that applicant’s daughter had
applied for renewal of her passport with the office of Passport Seva Kendra,
Bengaluru. It is stated that the passport authorities have informed daughter of
the applicant that passport of applicant is required in order to renew the
passport of his daughter. Copy of the relevant documents are annexed with
the application as Annexure-A/1 & A/2. It is further submitted that bail was
granted to the applicant vide order dated 01.09.2023 and passport of the
applicant was surrendered before the court in compliance of bail order.
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramakrishna Page 1 of 2
2 Reply filed on behalf of CBI. It is stated by Ld. PP that
applicant has not submitted any document to support his claim that his
daughter has successfully received admission in various foreign universities.
3 It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for applicant that passport
authorities do examine and compare the original with the photocopy of the
passport.
4 Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for
applicant, it is ordered that passport of the applicant be released to him for a
period of one month so as to enable the applicant to renew the passport of his
daughter. Accused is further directed to furnish security in the form of
FDR/bank guarantee for a sum of Rs. 5 Lakhs (Five Lakhs only).
5 In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the application
is allowed. The applicant is directed to surrender his passport in court
immediately after renewal of passport of his daughter.
6 Copy of this order be given dasti to the accused/applicant and to
the CBI, as prayed. Digitally
signed by
ANKIT
ANKIT SINGLA
SINGLA Date:
2025.02.07
15:32:44
+0530
(ANKIT SINGLA)
SPECIAL JUDGE-02, CBI (PC ACT)
RADC, NEW DELHI/07.02.2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramakrishna Page 2 of 2
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramkrishna
(FIR No. RC2162018A0011 (RC AC1 2018 A0011)
U/s 120 B IPC r/w 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2) PC Act 1988
and substantive offences thereof
CNR No. DLCT11-000236-2022)
CC no. 28/2022
22.03.2025
(Present proceedings have been conducted on Hybrid Mode)
Present : Shri Raj Kamal, Ld. PP for CBI alongwith IO Dy. SP
Shri Pushpal Paul.
Shri Shivam Batra, Ld. Counsel for (A-1) Chitra
Ramkrishna
Ms.Saloni, Ld. Counsel for (A-2) Anand
Subaramanian.
Shri Harshit Sethi, Ld. Counsel for (A-3) Sanjay
Gupta & (A-7) M/s OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd.
Shri Sidharth Satija, Ld. counsel for (A-4) Aman
Kokrady.
Shri Tushar Anand, Ld. Counsel for (A-5) Abhilasha
Kukreja has appeared through VC.
Shri Ankur Sood, Ld. counsel for (A-6) Vikas
Goenka.
Shri Pranav Jain, Ld. Counsel for (A-7) M/s OPG
Securities.
(A-1) Chitra Ramkrishna, (A-2) Anand
Subaramanian, (A-3) Sanjay Gupta for self and for
(A-7) M/s OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd., (A-4) Aman
Kokrady, (A-5) Abhilasha Kukreja & (A-6) Vikas
Goenka have appeared through VC.
List of unrelied upon documents and reply to the
objections raised by defence and compliance U/s 207 Cr. P.C filed
by IO. Copy supplied. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel that only
yesterday IO supplied the digital evidence and the files are
running into lakhs in number and they need time to access the
same. IO has submitted that he could not do the needful earlier as
he was deputed in some other matter and due to that he could not
comply with the direction of court in time. The digital evidence
has been supplied to A-2, A-4, A-6 & A-7. Remaining accused
persons except A-5 have not approached the IO. Today they have
not raised any objection. It seems that they have no objection or
issue regarding digital evidence. Ld. Counsel for A-5 prayed that
he would require 2 – 3 days time to provide hard disk to IO.
Be put up for scrutiny and further submissions of Ld.
Counsels for 05.05.2025.
Digitally
signed by
ANKIT
ANKIT SINGLA
SINGLA Date:
2025.03.22
16:22:24
+0530
(ANKIT SINGLA)
Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-02
Rouse Avenue District Court
New Delhi/22.03.2025
IA 16/2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramkrishna
(FIR No. RC2162018A0011 (RC AC1 2018 A0011)
CNR No. DLCT11-000236-2022)
CC no. 28/2022
08.04.2025
Fresh application moved on behalf of A-6 Vikas Goenka seeking
surrender of passport has been assigned to this court by order of
Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, CBI,
PC Act, RADC, New Delhi. It be checked and registered.
Present: Sh.Raj Kamal, Ld. PP for CBI.
Shri Prajwal Suman, Ld. proxy Counsel for A-6.
Applicant Vikas Goienka in person.
In compliance of order dated 07.02.2025, applicant has
surrrendered his passport in court today. Same be taken on record.
Application stands disposed off accordingly.
Digitally
signed by
ANKIT ANKIT SINGLA
Date:
SINGLA 2025.04.08
15:56:19
+0530
(ANKIT SINGLA)
Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-02
Rouse Avenue District Court
New Delhi/08.04.2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramkrishna
(FIR No. RC2162018A0011 (RC AC1 2018 A0011)
U/s 120 B IPC r/w 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2) PC Act 1988
and substantive offences thereof
CNR No. DLCT11-000236-2022)
CC no. 28/2022
05.05.2025
(Present proceedings have been conducted on Hybrid Mode)
Present : Shri Raj Kamal, Ld. PP for CBI alongwith IO Dy. SP
Shri Pushpal Paul.
Shri Shivam Batra, Ld. Counsel for (A-1) Chitra
Ramkrishna
Shri Aman Raj Gandhi, Ld. Counsel for (A-2) Anand
Subaramanian.
Ms. Mansi Tripathi, Ld. Counsel for (A-3) Sanjay
Gupta.
Ms. Afsha Moin, Ld. proxy Counsel for (A-5)
Abhilasha Kukreja has appeared through VC.
Shri Ankur Sood, Ld. counsel for (A-6) Vikas
Goenka.
Shri Pranav Jain, Ld. Counsel for (A-7) M/s OPG
Securities.
(A-1) Chitra Ramkrishna, (A-2) Anand
Subaramanian, (A-3) Sanjay Gupta for self and for
(A-7) M/s OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd., (A-4) Aman
Kokrady, (A-5) Abhilasha Kukreja & (A-6) Vikas
Goenka have appeared through VC.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for A-3 that one
e-mail was sent on behalf of A-3 mentioning to the IO that they
are not able to access the hard disk as it is password protected. It
is stated by IO that e-mail was received on 03.05.2025 i.e. one
day prior to court hearing and that too at 10.00 PM. It is stated by
IO that belated mail has been sent just to delay the matter. It is
further stated that hard disk was supplied to accused on
22.03.2025. The factum of A-3 sending e-mail at fag end just one
day prior to court hearing shows the conduct of A-3. No other
counsel has submitted that they are not able to access the hard
disk.
On last date of hearing, Ld. Counsel for A-5 had
stated that he require 2 - 3 days time to provide hard disk to the
IO but same has not been provided till date. Now Ld. Proxy
counsel Ms. Afsha Moin submits that hard disk would be
provided to the IO within 7 days. No reason has been assigned as
to why hard disk was not provided within 2 – 3 days to the IO
when sufficient time had been granted to A-5 to do the needful.
Although there is no reason as to why time be extended for this
purpose again. In the interest of justice, one more opportunity is
granted to A-5 to provide hard disk to IO in three days failing
which the right of A-5 will be closed.
Ld. Counsel for A-7 submits that in reply filed by the
CBI, it is stated that digital devices seized from A-1 Chitra
Ramkrishna and A-2 Anand Subaramanian were sent to CFSL and
subsequently sent to NFSU and it was further submitted that
digital evidence is in the process of extraction. It is stated that
said evidence has not been supplied to any of the accused till
date. IO submits that report has not been received and the same is
yet to be supplied to the accused persons.
IO has submitted that permission may be granted to
him to inspect the record/documents filed in court which have
been identified as illegible by the defence counsels so that he can
again photocopy or re-scan the same and provide copies of such
documents to the Ld. Counsels.
Be put up for scrutiny and further submissions of Ld.
Counsels for 26.05.2025.
Digitally
signed by
ANKIT
ANKIT SINGLA
SINGLA Date:
2025.05.06
15:25:38
+0530
(ANKIT SINGLA)
Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-02
Rouse Avenue District Court
New Delhi/05.05.2025
CBI Vs. Chitra Ramkrishna
(FIR No. RC2162018A0011 (RC AC1 2018 A0011)
U/s 120 B IPC r/w 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2) PC Act 1988
and substantive offences thereof
CNR No. DLCT11-000236-2022)
CC No. 28/2022
26.05.2025
Ld. Presiding Officer is on half day (F/N) leave.
Present: Shri Raj Kamal, Ld. PP for CBI along-with IO Dy. SP
Shri Pushpal Paul.
A-1 Chitra Ramkrishna, A-2 Anand Subaramanian, A-3
Sanjay Gupta for self and for A-7 M/s OPG Securities
Pvt. Ltd., A-4 Aman Kokrady, A-5 Abhilasha Kukreja &
A-6 Vikas Goenka have appeared through VC.
Shri Shivam Batra, Ld. Counsel for A-1 Chitra
Ramkrishna.
Shri Chaitanya Sharma, Ld. Counsel for A-2 Anand
Subaramanian.
Shri Siddharth Satija, Ld. Counsel for A-4 Aman
Kokrady through VC (Cisco Webex App).
Shri Tushar Anand, Ld. Counsel for A-5 Abhilasha
Kukreja.
Shri Ankur Sood, Ld. Counsel for A-6 Vikas Goenka.
As per directions of Ld. Presiding Officer, the matter be
listed for the purpose fixed on 08.07.2025.
Ahlmad
26.05.2025
