Indian Institute of Management Kashipur
Master of Business Administration 2023 - 25
Movies for Management
(Term VI) Group Assignment
Guided by
Prof. K M Baharul Islam
Submitted by
Group 12
Debmalya Bag MBA23021
Divyangna K Sinha MBA23023
Poorvi Verma MBA23046
Pratikhya Panda MBA23191
Table Of Contents
Topic Page No
Introduction 3
Background of Enron 4
Key Executives & Their Roles 5
Fraudulent Practices at Enron 6
Role of Corporate Governance & Auditors 7
Impact of the Scandal 8
Comparative Cases of Corporate Fraud 9
Lessons Learned 10
Conclusion 11
References 12
2
Introduction
Once a Wall Street favorite, Enron gained notoriety for one of the worst business
catastrophes in history. Originally a cutting-edge energy corporation, the company fell apart
as a result of unethical leadership, corporate greed, and dishonest accounting methods. The
emergence of Enron, its fraudulent operations, and the lessons learnt from its demise are all
examined in this paper.
With a valuation of around $70 billion, Enron was the seventh-largest corporation in the US
at its height. It was highly respected in the financial markets and was considered a pioneer in
energy trading and investing methods. By creating innovative market-based trading methods,
the firm transformed the energy industry and went from being a conventional energy supplier
to a sophisticated financial institution. However, a number of questionable accounting
techniques were responsible for its enormous success.
The executives of Enron, under the direction of Kenneth Lay, Jeffrey Skilling, and Andrew
Fastow, established a corporate culture that valued rapid expansion and financial
manipulation over moral accountability. Through the use of dishonest financial tools
including mark-to-market accounting and off-balance-sheet special purpose organizations,
they took advantage of gaps in accounting standards to create a false impression of
profitability. These methods concealed enormous debts from investors and regulatory bodies
while inflating profitability. Additionally, the organization created a poisonous work
atmosphere that rewarded individuals who put short-term profits ahead of long-term
corporate strategies and promoted high-risk decision-making.
The collapse of Enron in 2001 shocked global markets and highlighted critical flaws in
corporate governance and financial oversight. The scandal led to widespread job losses,
financial ruin for investors, and a crisis of confidence in corporate accountability. The
ensuing legal battles and regulatory changes, including the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, reshaped corporate governance frameworks worldwide. Understanding Enron’s
fraudulent practices provides valuable insights into the importance of ethical business
operations, regulatory oversight, and the role of corporate leadership in maintaining financial
transparency. This case study serves as a cautionary tale for future business leaders,
underscoring the necessity of ethical leadership and financial responsibility in sustaining
long-term corporate success.
3
Background of Enron
In 1985, two regional energy businesses, Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth, merged to
form Enron. Kenneth Lay led Enron to become a major force in the global energy industry by
rapidly growing its business and creating new financial trading systems for the energy
industry. The company quickly expanded into energy trading, broadband, water services, and
other market-based solutions after originally concentrating on traditional energy delivery
services.
Enron had adopted a strategy focused on deregulated energy markets by the 1990s. The
business created Enron Online, a trading platform that pioneered digital commerce by
enabling real-time energy trading. Enron received a lot of accolades for its inventive strategy
and financial success, and Fortune's annual list consistently listed it as one of the most
admired businesses. Top-tier talent was drawn to it, and its management received praise for
their strategic vision and business savvy.
But Enron's explosive growth was not supported by a strong basis. The business embraced a
high-risk, high-reward strategy that mostly depended on speculative trading and intricate
financial instruments. In order to conceal debt from investors, it engaged in off-the-books
financing while pursuing growth aggressively through partnerships and acquisitions.
Enron used dishonest financial techniques, particularly mark-to-market accounting and
special purpose entities (SPEs), to maintain its reputation as a very successful company. By
using these strategies, the business was able to hide losses and liabilities while reporting a
notable increase in revenue. Executives were encouraged to raise stock prices, frequently at
the price of stability over the long run. Due to inadequate internal control systems, auditors
like Arthur Andersen were unable to identify or disclose the escalating financial
irregularities.
Executives profited greatly personally from Enron's stock price surge, selling their holdings
while urging staff and investors to keep funding the business. When experts and regulators
started to doubt Enron's financial stability, the lack of openness and oversight finally reached
a breaking point. When the company's fraudulent practices were revealed in late 2001, it
collapsed catastrophically, wiping out billions of dollars in shareholder value and resulting in
one of the most well-known business bankruptcies in history.
4
Key Executives & Their Roles
Key Ethical
Name Role Outcome
Characteristics Behavior
Charismatic, Claimed Convicted, died
Founder &
Kenneth Lay politically ignorance of before
Chairman
connected fraud sentencing
Implemented
Aggressive, Convicted,
aggressive
Jeffrey Skilling CEO intellectually sentenced to
accounting
arrogant prison
strategies
Created Turned state's
Financial fraudulent witness,
Andrew Fastow CFO
engineer financial reduced
schemes sentence
Sold massive Escaped major
Eccentric,
Lou Pai Executive stock before legal
profit-driven
collapse consequences
Criticized
Introspective, Died by suicide
Clifford Baxter Vice Chairman company’s
conflicted after the scandal
practices
The culture and strategic direction of Enron were significantly shaped by these people.
Although Kenneth Lay gave the impression of being honest, he did not accept accountability
for the deceptive actions. Jeffrey Skilling actively worked to maximize profits, creating a
culture that encouraged immoral behavior. In order to falsify Enron's financial reports,
Andrew Fastow created intricate financial arrangements. Lou Pai avoided personal legal
consequences by profiting from Enron's inflated stock prices before to its collapse. Although
Clifford Baxter voiced his concerns about the unethical tactics, he ultimately encountered
personal challenges that led to tragedy. One of the worst business scandals in history resulted
from their combined acts.
5
Fraudulent Practices at Enron
Enron participated in a number of dishonest and fraudulent financial activities, such
as:
1. Mark-to-Market Accounting: Enron created the appearance of success by
booking future gains as though they were assured. By using this strategy, Enron was
able to deceive analysts and investors by inflating its earnings. Even if the actual cash
flow from long-term contracts would not materialize for several years, mark-to-
market accounting allowed the corporation to collect revenue from these
arrangements immediately. Enron was actually having financial difficulties, but this
approach gave the impression that company was very successful.
2. Special Purpose organizations (SPEs): Enron's financial statements were made to
look healthier than they actually were by concealing debt and liabilities through the
employment of these off-balance-sheet organizations. The business protected these
SPEs from the scrutiny of investors by transferring its failing assets and liabilities to
them. Executives at Enron, including CFO Andrew Fastow, owned these companies
and benefited personally from these agreements.
3. Stock Price Manipulation: While executives sold their own shares in private,
Enron's leadership aggressively marketed the company's stock to sustain high market
valuations. Unaware that business officials were cashing out their shares, employees
were encouraged to invest their retirement funds in Enron stock. When the stock price
crashed, this deception caused investors and employees to suffer catastrophic
financial losses.
4. Employee Pressure: Enron promoted a poisonous corporate culture that put
immediate profits ahead of long-term viability. Unrealistic revenue expectations were
imposed on employees, which resulted in widespread unethical behavior. A culture of
fear and excessive risk-taking was fostered by the company's "rank and yank"
performance assessment system, which resulted in employees being dismissed if they
failed to reach rigorous performance targets.
6
Role of Corporate Governance & Auditors
The absence of supervision played a part in Enron's demise, even though the company's board
of directors and external auditors, including Arthur Andersen, expressed concerns. Due to the
board's lack of independent judgment, executives were able to engage in dangerous financial
activities without facing consequences. Due to their personal financial interests in Enron's
ongoing success, several board members had conflicts of interest and were less inclined to
question immoral judgments.
Due to its lucrative consulting contracts with Enron, Arthur Andersen, one of the biggest
accounting companies at the time, was in a serious conflict of interest. Arthur Andersen was
implicated in approving Enron's dishonest accounting practices rather than serving as an
impartial watchdog. In addition to failing to identify fraudulent activities, the business
actively helped to conceal them by destroying important records pertaining to Enron's
financial audits in order to thwart inquiries.
The company’s board of directors and auditors failed to act as independent checks on
executive power, allowing fraudulent activities to continue unchecked. The scandal led to
Arthur Andersen’s collapse and the implementation of stricter corporate governance
regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which established new auditing and
financial disclosure requirements to prevent similar cases of fraud in the future.
7
Impact of the Scandal
The collapse of Enron had devastating consequences for various stakeholders, ranging from
employees and investors to the broader financial system.
Employees
As the company's stock, which had previously been worth over $90 a share, fell to less than
$1, more than 20,000 workers lost their jobs, and many of them lost everything they had
saved for retirement. These workers were left penniless when the company collapsed because
they had been urged to put their pensions into Enron stock.
Investors
The demise of Enron cost investors billions of dollars in losses. Significant financial setbacks
were experienced by institutional and individual investors, many of whom had faith in the
company's sustained expansion. As suspicion toward other publicly traded corporations
increased due to a reduction in trust in corporate financial reporting, the stock market also felt
the effects.
Economy
The collapse of Enron had an equally important effect on the economy as a whole. Investor
trust plummeted as a result of the affair, which raised questions about financial statements
and auditing procedures. The involvement of auditors in corporate crime was brought to light
by the closure of Arthur Andersen, one of the biggest accounting firms in the world, for its
complicity in Enron's fraudulent operations.
In response, regulatory agencies moved quickly, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed in
2002. Stricter corporate governance guidelines were adopted by this law, which also
strengthened supervision procedures to stop future fraud of this kind and held CEOs more
responsible for financial disclosures. The Enron scandal continues to be a seminal case,
illustrating the dire consequences of unethical corporate conduct for people, companies, and
the overall economy.
8
Comparative Cases of Corporate Fraud
Enron’s scandal is one of the most infamous corporate frauds in history, but it is not an
isolated case. Several other corporations have engaged in similar unethical practices, leading
to financial crises & economic instability. Two significant cases that share similarities with
Enron’s downfall include:
Satyam Computers Scandal (2009)
In order to increase revenues and profits, one of the biggest IT companies in India falsified
financial records. Ramalinga Raju, the company's founder, admitted to falsifying records by
around ₹7,136 crore ($1.5 billion). Due to the deception of investors, Satyam's stock fell
75%, resulting in enormous financial losses. Stronger corporate governance measures were
implemented in India as a result of the controversy, which ultimately led to Tech Mahindra
acquiring the firm.
IL&FS Crisis (2018)
It brought attention to the problems of excessive borrowing and poor financial management
in India's infrastructure industry. Through unsustainable projects, the company accrued an
astounding ₹91,000 crore in debt, which ultimately resulted in defaults and a financial sector
crisis. The crisis revealed regulatory gaps, fraudulent reporting, and governance
shortcomings, leading the Indian government to step in and detain important executives.
The patterns of Enron—false financial statements, poor governance, and a lack of
transparency—are evident in both of these cases. In order to stop widespread fraud and
safeguard stakeholders and investors, these examples highlight the significance of
independent auditing, conscientious corporate governance, and strict financial control.
9
Lessons Learned
There are important lessons to be learned from the Enron crisis for investors, regulators, and
companies. The necessity of moral leadership is among the most important lessons learned.
Transparency and honesty must take precedence above immediate profits for corporate
CEOs. The disastrous demise of Enron was caused by the leadership's encouragement of
dishonesty.
Another important lesson is the significance of sound corporate governance. Executives can
be stopped from committing fraud by independent scrutiny from regulatory bodies and boards
of directors. Because Enron's board lacked adequate checks and balances, the company's
executives were able to falsify financial figures without facing consequences.
Transparency in financial reporting is crucial. Investors and stakeholders rely on accurate
and truthful financial disclosures to make informed decisions. The use of complex accounting
methods to hide losses, as seen in Enron, ultimately undermines trust in financial markets.
Companies should adopt clear and honest financial reporting practices to build investor
confidence and long-term stability.
Furthermore, it is crucial to have a strong business culture that forbids unethical behavior.
Employees who participated in risky financial activities were rewarded by Enron, which
fostered a poisonous and fiercely competitive workplace. Employers should foster moral
work environments where staff members can voice issues without worrying about reprisals.
Finally, it is impossible to overstate the significance of regulatory monitoring. Although the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act brought about important reforms, continued attention is necessary to stop
fraud in the future. In addition to ensuring adherence to strict financial requirements,
regulators must constantly adjust to changing company plans.
10
Conclusion
The Enron scandal serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of corporate greed and unethical
leadership. It underscores the importance of transparency, accountability, and strong
corporate governance in maintaining sustainable business practices. The collapse of Enron
demonstrated that short-term profit maximization at the expense of ethical considerations can
lead to disastrous consequences.
By learning from Enron’s failures, businesses can implement stronger financial reporting
standards, promote ethical decision-making, and establish a culture of integrity. Companies
should not only comply with regulations but also foster a workplace environment that
prioritizes long-term sustainability over immediate financial gains.
Regulatory bodies must continue to enhance oversight mechanisms and enforce compliance
to prevent corporate fraud. The lessons from Enron must remain at the forefront of corporate
governance discussions to ensure similar scandals do not occur in the future. Ultimately,
ethical leadership and financial responsibility are critical to preserving the trust and stability
of global financial markets.
Linkedin post URL: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/debmalya-bag-6600581b0_enron-
movie-review-activity-7301262952785944576-gvim?
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADEhDqgB1Jqh6x9f0yCD
Zn26Dfb4wtg7aKU
11
References
Bruner, R. F. (2011). Ethical dimensions of the financial crisis of 2007-2008. Business and
Society Review, 116(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2011.00376.x
Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2011). The responsibility and accountability of CEOs: The last
interview with Ken Lay. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 209-219.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0675-y
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/01/08/open-secrets-3
Oppel, R. A., Jr., & Eichenwald, K. (2002, January 16). Enron's collapse: The overview;
Arthur Andersen fires an executive for Enron orders. The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/16/business/enron-s-collapse-overview-arthur-andersen-
fires-executive-for-enron-orders.html
Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: culture matters more than codes).
Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024194519384
Watkins, S. (2003). Ethical conflicts at Enron: Moral responsibility in corporate capitalism.
California Management Review, 45(4), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166185
12
