1-s2.0-S0950061816311941-main
1-s2.0-S0950061816311941-main
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Most brick companies nowadays focus their research on the recycling of waste, in order to be able to mar-
Received 7 March 2016 ket new types of bricks. In this work, we explored the possibility of using ceramic sludge in brick produc-
Received in revised form 4 July 2016 tion, aiming to find an alternative eco-friendly additive to produce ‘‘eco-bricks” characterised by suitable
Accepted 17 July 2016
mechanical and aesthetic properties and durability. For this purpose, two types of bricks produced by an
Available online 25 July 2016
Italian factory (SanMarco-Terreal) were compared with a newly designed brick obtained from the same
starting clay, with the addition of ceramic sludge in place of the traditionally used siliceous sand. Bricks
Keywords:
and raw materials were investigated with a multivariate approach, consisting in the mineralogical and
Bricks
Sludge
chemical analysis, and the final products microstructurally investigated and their physical-mechanical
Mineralogy properties determined. Results show that bricks produced with added ceramic sludge can substitute tra-
Physical-mechanical properties ditional bricks well, fulfilling aesthetic requirements and maintaining sufficient mechanical properties.
Durability However, one drawback was that these new materials did not respond to freeze-thaw cycles, highlighting
Aesthetic quality their potential vulnerability in cold climates.
Porosity Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.096
0950-0618/Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
220 C. Coletti et al. / Construction and Building Materials 124 (2016) 219–227
One type of waste is sludge from ceramic production, consisting [11], and the NCSDC 74301 (GSMS-1) standard [12] was
mainly of silico-aluminous-based components (>50%), generally applied. Grain-size distribution in the size range between 0.02
with low contents of heavy metals [1]. Being compositionally sim- and 2000 lm of the sludge was determined using a Mastersizer
ilar to the raw clayey materials of bricks, this type of waste is 2000LF laser diffraction particle size analyser (Malvern
related to ceramic production and often inadequately disposed Instruments).
of, although it is an important source of additives in brick produc- The mineralogical composition of raw materials and bricks was
tion if properly designed new mixes are created. Nowadays, most determined by X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD) on a PANalytical
ceramic-producing companies have addressed their research and X’Pert diffractometer with Co-Ka radiation, operating at 40 kV
organisation of productive plants to recycle waste, save energy and 40 mA intensity; XRPD data were interpreted by X’Pert PRO
and re-use resources (mainly water) deriving from the production HighScore PlusÒ software (PANalytical). Semiquantitative phase
cycle, thus saving natural resources and resolving the waste dis- analysis was performed on the crystalline phases using the RIR
posal problem. All these aspects contribute much to the evaluation method. Since none internal standard was used during the XRPD
of company performance. Although re-using ceramic production acquisition, relative abundance of the amorphous phase was
waste (shards) is quite common, re-using sludge is more difficult, expressed only qualitatively, taking into consideration the pattern
due to its intrinsic nature. Sludge is very fine-grained and, accord- profile.
ing to the type of ceramic production from which it derives, does Colour of the raw materials and the fired bricks was determined
contain heavy metals in variable quantities, from few ppm as they on a Konica Minolta CM-700d spectrophotometer (10 measures
naturally occur in the base clay and possibly added temper, to per samples were performed). According to the CIE system, colour
some percent, as in the case of glazed and colour ware. Therefore, is described considering a parameter for luminescence (L⁄) and two
a sludge does not reflect environmental and human safety require- chromatic coordinates, a⁄ and b⁄, which reflect the amount of
ments, indicating that continual quality control of used materials is red-green (60: green,+60: red) and yellow-blue (60: blue,+60:
always important. yellow), respectively. Colorimetry was performed in dry and then
This work explores the possibility of using ceramic sludge in in wet conditions on the fired bricks, to determine all possible
brick production. Two types of commercial bricks produced by colour changes due to the presence of water or humidity. Colour
the Italian factory SanMarco-Terreal were analysed, and the results difference DE was calculated according to the following equation:
were compared with a newly designed brick obtained from the qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2
ðL1 L2 Þ þ ða1 a2 Þ2 þ ðb1 b2 Þ
2
same starting clay tempered with ceramic sludge instead of the DE ¼
traditional siliceous sand. More in detail, the sludge here used
was obtained from the mechanical treatment (such as lapping or where subscript 1 refers to measurements on dry samples and sub-
scrapping) of a clay based highly-fired ceramic material. The min- script 2 on wet ones.
eralogical composition, texture, physical properties, water beha- Petrographic features, texture and degree of vitrification of the
viour and durability of both traditionally produced and newly bricks were studied on polished thin sections by Optical Micro-
designed bricks were analysed by a multi-analytical approach, scopy (OM) under polarized light with an Olympus DX–50
and the possibility of recycling ceramic sludge in brick production equipped with a Nikon D7000 digital microphotography system,
was critically evaluated. and on back-scattered electron (BSE) images obtained by Field
This research arose from definite interest on the part of the Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) with a LEO
company, which provided full technical support. GEMINI 1530, coupled to an INCA-200 Oxford microanalysis
system.
Water absorption [13] and drying [14] tests on fired bricks were
2. Materials and methods performed on cube-shaped samples (50-mm edge) on three sam-
ples of each brick type. Free and forced absorption (Al and Af), dry-
Three types of bricks (two (bricks 1 and 2) commercialized and ing index (Di), apparent and real density (Da and Dr), open porosity
industrially produced, and one (brick 3) experimentally produced (P) and degree of pore interconnection (Ax) were calculated.
in the SanMarco-Terreal laboratory, simulating the same prepara- Capillary rise (B) was studied on three prism-shaped samples
tion, forming and firing conditions used for the industrial ones) (25 25 120 mm) for each brick type, according to UNI EN
were prepared with the same carbonate-rich clay, quarried from 1925 [15]. The coefficient of capillarity (Ks) was calculated 9 min
the area of Marcon (Venice inland) and fired at 1050 °C. Any differ- after the test began.
ences among them were due to the additives used. Bricks were The distribution of pore access size (range 0.003–360 lm) was
formed by the soft-mud shaping method, in which the clay paste determined by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) on a model
is placed into 5 12 20 cm moulds, the walls of which are 9410 Micromeritics Autopore apparatus, which can generate a
spread with quartz sand to avoid clay from sticking and favour pressure of 414 MPa. Freshly cut samples of approximately 2 cm3
both water drainage while pressing and the separation from the were oven-dried for 24 h at 110 °C and then analysed. Nitrogen
mould. The colour of the commercial bricks was yellow (brick 1) adsorption was used to determine porosity in the range diameter
and black (brick 2), and both were prepared by tempering clay 2–3000 Å. Sorption isotherms were determined at 77 K on a
with 10 wt% of siliceous sand, but the black brick was obtained Micromeritics Tristar 3000 in continuous adsorption conditions.
adding to the clay paste and quartz sand also 15 wt% of the colour- Prior to measurement, samples were heated to 130 °C for 24 h
ing agent hausmannite (Mn2+Mn3+ 2 O4). Hausmannite is a secondary and out-gassed to 103 Torr on a Micromeritics Flowprep. The
waste product, approved according to valid environmental impact Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method was used to obtain pore-
criteria [10] and derived from industrial sources, such as the produc- size distribution curves.
tion of ferroalloys and MnO2-based batteries. The newly designed Vp (compression pulse) and Vs (shear pulse) propagation veloc-
brick (brick 3) was prepared by tempering the same clay with ities were measured to check the elastic-mechanical characteristics
10 wt% of dried ceramic sludge provided by SanMarco-Terreal. and structural anisotropy of the fired bricks, and to detect com-
Raw materials (clay and sludge) and fired products were chem- pactness variations during and after ageing. Waves were transmit-
ically analysed by X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) using a S4 Pioneer ted in the three perpendicular directions of the cube-shaped
(Brucker AXS) spectrometer (estimated detection limit for major samples (50-mm edge) on a Panametrics HV Pulser/Receiver
elements: 0.01 wt%); ZAF correction was performed systematically 5058PR coupled to a Tektronix TDS 3012B oscilloscope.
C. Coletti et al. / Construction and Building Materials 124 (2016) 219–227 221
Measurements were performed with Panametrics transducers of during the freeze-thaw test and every 3 cycles of salt crystallisa-
1 MHz on a contact surface 3 cm in diameter. Once wave velocities tion), sample compactness was also monitored by ultrasound.
(Vp and Vs) and apparent density (by MIP) were established, Pois-
son’s Coefficient (m), Young (E), shear (S) and bulk (K) modules
were calculated. 3. Results and discussion
Uniaxial mechanical tests were carried out on three cubic sam-
ples (40 40 40 mm) on an IPEMSA Model S-110 press with a 3.1. Clay and recycled materials
load force of 20 kg/s, according to UNI EN 1926 [16].
Accelerated ageing tests were carried out on three cubic samples According to mineralogical composition (Fig. 1; Table 1), the
(50 mm edge) for each brick type, to evaluate their resistance to clay material was an illitic-chloritic highly calcareous (carbonate-
frost and salt crystallisation. Freeze-thaw and salt crystallisation rich) clay. The abundance of carbonate was confirmed by the high
tests followed UNI EN 12371 [17] and UNI EN 12370 [18] norms, values of calcium and magnesium oxides, and loss of ignition
respectively. The former consists of 30 cycles each lasting 24 h, each (Table 2: CaO + MgO = 22.51 wt%; LOI = 19.65 wt%). The abundance
cycle including 8 h of freezing at 12 °C and 16 h of thawing at of carbonate conferred a yellow hue on the fired bricks, with a high
+20 °C under water. Samples were weighed at each cycle and care- b⁄ value (16.05) (Table 3).
fully observed visually to check their progressive decay. At the end Macroscopically, the powdered sludge was pale yellow in colour,
of the tests, samples were dried to measure their weight loss. The with a high value of lightness (L⁄ = 84.87) and low values of a⁄ and b⁄
salt crystallisation test consisted of 10 24-h cycles, during which coordinates (6.28 and 1.27, respectively) (Table 3). Its grain-size dis-
the samples were immersed for 4 h in a 14 wt% solution of NaSO4 tribution ranged between 0.25 and 1002 lm, with most of the parti-
10H2O at 20 °C, dried for 16 h in an electric oven at 100 °C, and cles (90%) smaller than 100 lm (Fig. 2). Chemically, sludge is highly
cooled for 4 h at 20 °C. They were weighed at each cycle and siliceous, and does not contain heavy metals (Table 1), i.e., it may be
observed by visual inspection. They were then washed in water, used safely in industrial production. From a mineralogical view-
to remove any salts trapped in pores, and dried to measure their point, this material is mainly composed of quartz, associated
weight loss. During both tests, at regular intervals (every 5 cycles with plagioclase, mullite, cristobalite and an amorphous phase
Gh
Gh
Counts Counts
Hausmannite Brick 2
20000
15000
Qz
10000
Gh
10000
Bst
Qz Fs
5000
Counts Qz Counts Qz
Sludge Brick 3
30000
20000
20000
Gh
10000
Qz Fs
10000 Qz Di
Mul
Gh
Mul Crs Pl
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Position [°2Theta] Position [°2Theta]
Fig. 1. XRPD patterns of raw materials (clay, hausmannite, sludge) and fired bricks. Hausmannite and Brick 2 show a high background due to the Mn-fluorescence effect in the
powder sample produced by the cobalt anode incident radiation.
222 C. Coletti et al. / Construction and Building Materials 124 (2016) 219–227
Table 1
Semi-quantitative mineral composition determined by RIR method on XRPD data of raw clay material, hausmannite (Hsm), sludge and three fired bricks. Mineral abbreviations
after Whitney and Evans [40]: Qz = quartz; Ill = illite; Chl = chlorite; Kfs = K-feldspar; Pl = plagioclase; Cal = calcite; Dol = dolomite; Hem = hematite; Hsm = hausmannite;
Mul = mullite; Crs = cristobalite; Di = diopside; Gh = gehlenite; Wo = wollastonite; Bst = bustamite. Qualitative estimation of amorphous phase (Am): ⁄⁄⁄ = abundant; ⁄⁄ = -
medium; ⁄ = scarce; – = absent.
Raw Materials Qz Ill Chl Kfs Pl Cal Dol Hem Hsm Mul Crs Am
Clay 30 12 14 5 6 19 14 1 – – – –
Hsm – – – – – – – – 100 – – –
⁄⁄
Sludge 67 – – – 16 – – – – 16 2
Fired bricks Qz Kfs Pl Hem Wo Di Gh Bst Am
⁄⁄
1 28 11 19 1 12 11 18 –
⁄⁄⁄
2 21 20 18 1 – 12 16 11
⁄
3 28 17 21 1 7 13 13 –
Table 2
Chemical composition of major elements, expressed in wt% of oxides for clay material and sludge. LOI = Loss on Ignition.
SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 MnO MgO CaO Na2O K2O TiO2 P2O5 LOI
Clay 39.81 10.63 3.87 0.08 4.75 17.76 0.54 2.37 0.43 0.11 19.65
Sludge 72.52 18.36 1.20 0.01 0.51 1.00 3.11 2.31 0.71 0.11 0.16
Table 3
Colour coordinates L⁄, a⁄ and b⁄ for raw clay material, hausmannite (Hsm), sludge and three fired bricks, measured in dry and wet conditions. DE: colour difference. Concerning
the brick with sludge (Brick 3), colour analysis was also performed after salt crystallisation (A.S.C.) test.
Raw materials
L⁄ SDL⁄ a⁄ SDa⁄ b⁄ SDb⁄
Clay 63.89 ±1.30 2.41 ±0.12 16.05 ±1.25
Hsm 35.67 ±1.03 10.85 ±0.87 8.70 ±2.77
Sludge 84.87 ±0.27 1.27 ±0.03 6.28 ±0.22
Fired bricks
Dry Wet
L⁄ SDL⁄ a⁄ SDa⁄ b⁄ SDb⁄ L⁄ SDL⁄ a⁄ SDa⁄ b⁄ SDb⁄ DE
Brick 1 71.95 ±1.35 6.63 ±0.49 23.62 ±1.02 58.78 ±1.12 9.61 ±0.46 26.86 ±1.03 13.88
Brick 2 37.05 ±0.72 4.48 ±0.11 7.32 ±0.27 26.22 ±0.56 3.72 ±0.09 5.30 ±0.20 11.04
Brick 3 72.20 ±0.77 6.39 ±0.56 18.98 ±1.00 57.90 ±0.55 10.00 ±0.41 23.22 ±0.80 15.34
Brick 3 A.F. 58.89 ±4.02 11.97 ±1.52 24.66 ±1.99 57.58 ±1.03 11.11 ±0.31 24.97 ±0.55 1.60
3.5
3.2. Fired bricks
3
Volume %
a b
5 mm 5 µm
c d
5 mm 5 µm
e f
5 mm 5 µm
Fig. 3. Photomicrographs (plain polars) of fired bricks: (a, b) brick 1; (c, d) brick 3; (e, f) brick 2.
a b
Qz Gh
Wo Ca 2+
Wo Qz
10 µm 1 µm
c bubble d
development Ill + Mn/Fe-bearing
Bst
10 µm 3 µm
Kfs
e f
bubble Wo
development
10 µm 10 µm
Fig. 4. FESEM-BSE images: (a) quartz and feldspar grains with reaction rims where gehlenite and wollastonite formed (brick 1); (b) Ca2+ enrichment at quartz rim with sub-
solidus reaction producing wollastonite (brick 1); (c) diffuse occurrence of bustamite (CaMnSi2O6) and considerable development of rounded pores forming bubbles by
reaction among minerals in groundmass (brick 2); (d) K-feldspar with formation of bustamite and phyllosilicate (Ill), with abundant Fe- and Mn-bearing oxides (brick 2); (e)
development of bubble-shaped pores and reaction rims (brick 3); (f) fibrous wollastonite crystals growing on quartz grains close to pores (brick 3). Abbreviations as in caption
of Table 1.
Table 4
Hydric parameters: Ab = free water absorption (%); Af = forced water absorption (%); Ax = degree of pore interconnection (%); Di = drying index; poHT = open porosity (%);
DbHT = apparent density (kg m3); DskHT = real skeletal density (kg m3); Ks = capillarity coefficient (g cm2 min½); B = capillarity rise (cm min½). MIP values: poMIP = open
porosity (%); DbMIP = apparent density (kg m3); DskMIP = real (skeletal) density (kg m3). N2 adsorption: BHJ des. V. = BHJ desorption Volume (cm3 g1).
3.2.4. Hydric behaviour and porosity the highest Ax value (3.76%), suggesting the difficulty of water
The hydric parameters (Table 4) indicated that the three bricks migrating within the brick. Brick 2 showed intermediate
differed in their water behaviour. Brick 3 was the sample with the characteristics.
highest free absorption value (Ab = 27.94%) and the best pore inter- Drying was very similar for bricks 1 and 2 (Di values: 1.35 and
connections (Ax = 1.43%), indicating pores favouring water access. 1.36, respectively), although brick 3 dried faster (Di = 0.39). Open
Brick 1 was the sample with the greatest difference between free porosity p0 was quite similar in all samples, the highest value being
and forced absorption (Ab = 27.63%; Af = 28.71%), as confirmed by recorded in brick 3 (p0 = 42.12%) and the lowest in brick 2
C. Coletti et al. / Construction and Building Materials 124 (2016) 219–227 225
Table 5
(a) 3 Ultrasonic test. Propagation velocities of ultrasonic Vp and Vs pulses (m s1).
1.4 DM = total anisotropy (%); m = Poisson’s ratio; E = Young’s modulus (GPa); G = shear
modulus (GPa); K = bulk modulus (GPa). Uniaxial test: r = stress values (N mm2).
1.2
1 1 DS1 2 DS2 3 DS3
LogDV/Dr (ml/g)
1
0.8 2 Compression pulse (Vp) 2773 ±94 2804 ±75 2423 ±150
Shear pulse (Vs) 1299 ±71 1299 ±50 1326 ±100
0.6 Total anisotropy (DM) 12.26 ±4.88 10.73 ±1.24 12.30 ±4.86
0.4 Poisson’s ratio (m) 0.36 ±0.01 0.37 ±0.00 0.29 ±0.01
Young’s modulus (E) 64 ±3 63 ±3 72 ±3
0.2 Shear modulus (G) 11 ±2 12 ±1 15 ±1
0 Bulk modulus (K) 76 ±6 79 ±7 57 ±4
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Stress values (r) 14.80 ±1.66 18.73 ±2.55 15.20 ±2.74
r (µm)
(b) in this pore-size interval (Fig. 5c). Conversely, the absence of these
0.35 micropores was the main cause, together with the best pore inter-
2
0.3 connections, of the faster drying velocities of brick 3 [19]. This evi-
dence indicates that the addition of sludge, probably because of its
Vads (cm3 g-1)
0.25
grain size and high degree of vitrification, determines lower micro-
0.2
1 porosity than the other two bricks; instead, the addition of man-
0.15 ganese oxide is responsible for increases in microporosity.
0.1
0.05 3.2.5. Physical-mechanical properties and durability
3 The highest average value of propagation velocities of brick 2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 (Vp = 2773 m s1) (Table 5) was due to its high amorphous phase,
p/p0 which increased its compactness and made it more homogeneous.
This sample was in fact the brick with the lowest total anisotropy
(c) (DM = 10.73%) [19,29]. Bricks 1 and 3 showed very similar aniso-
0.02 tropy, although slightly higher (DM = 12.26% and 12.30%, respec-
tively), and the latter the lowest propagation velocity
0.015
Vads (cm3 g-1)
(a) (b)
0.4 2 3000 2
0.2 1 2500 1
0 2000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Vp (m s-1)
ΔM/M
-0.2
cycles (day) 1500
-0.4
1000
-0.6 3
-0.8 500
3
-1 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
cycles (day)
(c) (d)
0.2
2800
2
0.15
3 2700
Vp (m s-1)
0.1
1
ΔM/M
2600
0.05
2 2500
3
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 2400
-0.05 cycles (day) 1 0 1 3 7 10
-0.1 cycles (day)
Fig. 6. (a) Weight variation (DM/M) vs. cycles (days) of all bricks subjected to 30 freeze-thaw cycles; (b) propagation velocities of ultrasonic Vp pulses (m s1) during freeze-
thaw tests; (c) weight variation (DM/M) vs. time (h) of bricks subjected to 10 salt crystallisation cycles; (d) propagation velocities of ultrasonic Vp pulses (m s1) during salt
crystallisation tests.
salt and ice to crystallize within pores. The mechanism of ice and [12] G. Chen, J. Wang, The preparation of marine geological certified reference
materials polymetallic nodule GSPN-1 and marine sediment GSMS-1 from the
salt growth is similar and gives rise to a similar type of damage
Central Pacific Ocean, Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 22 (1998) 119–125.
[33]. The nucleation rate of salt is higher in pores with diameters [13] UNI EN 13755, Natural stone test methods – determination of water
between 1 and 10 lm [34]. In pores of less 0.1 lm, salt requires absorption at atmospheric pressure, CNR-ICR, Rome, 2008.
a considerable degree of saturation to precipitate, whereas in pores [14] NORMAL 29/88, Misura dell’indice di asciugamento (drying index), CNR-ICR,
Rome, 1988.
of more than 10 lm, salt prevents the generation of sufficient pres- [15] UNI EN 1925, Natural stone test methods – determination of water absorption
sure to damage the pore structure [35]. Porous materials with high coefficient by capillarity, CNR-ICR, Rome, 2000.
porosity and smaller pores are more prone to decay; this is proba- [16] UNI EN 1926, Natural stone test methods – determination of uniaxial
compressive strength, ICNR-ICR, Rome, 2007.
bly the reason why bricks 1 and 2 are the weakest to salts crystalli- [17] UNI EN 12371, Natural stone test methods – determination of frost resistance,
sation [36]. The increase in pore size of brick 3, instead, should CNR-ICR, Rome, 2010.
increase also the frost resistance [30]. The weakest response to [18] UNI EN 12370, Natural stone test methods – determination of resistance to salt
crystallisation, CNR-ICR, Rome, 2001.
frost of brick 3, with a greater number of pores with a radius larger [19] G. Cultrone, E. Sebastián, K. Elert, M.J. de la Torre, O. Cazalla, C. Rodriguez-
than 0.1 lm and the highest micro-porosity, suggests that crystals Navarro, Influence of mineralogy and firing temperature in the porosity of
can however efficiently grow inside the material, damaging it. This bricks, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34 (2004) 547–564.
[20] A. Gualtieri, M. Bellotto, G. Artioli, M. Clark, Kinetic study of the kaolinite-
behaviour was observed by Ravaglioli [37] in roofing tiles, in which mullite reaction sequence. Part II: Mullite formation, Phys. Chem. Miner. 22
pores with size in the range between 0.25 and 1.4 lm suffer more (1995) 215–222.
the frost damages [38,39]. [21] G. Cultrone, E. Sebastián, M.J. de la Torre, Mineralogical and physical
behaviours of solid bricks with additives, Constr. Build. Mater. 19 (2005) 39–
This evidence indicates that, although the brick with added
48.
sludge represents a valid substitute for commercial brick 1 (yel- [22] L. Maritan, L. Nodari, C. Mazzoli, A. Milano, U. Russo, Influence of firing
low) from many viewpoints, it may be susceptible if used in cold conditions in ceramic products: experimental study on clay rich in organic
climates. matter, Appl. Clay Sci. 31 (2006) 1–15.
[23] P. Duminuco, B. Messiga, M.P. Riccardi, Firing process of natural clays. Some
Our results confirm the possibility of economic and ecologic microtextures and related phase compositions, Termodinamica Acta 321
ways of improving the brick industry and developing new products (1998) 185–190.
with waste materials, and therefore reducing the need of [24] M.P. Riccardi, B. Messiga, P. Duminuco, An approach to the dynamics of clay
firing, Appl. Clay Sci. 15 (1999) 393–409.
georesources. [25] G. Cultrone, C. Rodriguez-Navarro, E.M. Sebastián, O. Cazalla, M.J. de la Torre,
Carbonate and silicate phase reactions during ceramic firing, Eur. J. Mineral. 13
Acknowledgements (2001) 621–634.
[26] P. Kemp, Chemismus Tunesischer Wasser Und Landklassifikation Der
Steppenstzone Oglat Merteba in Sud-Tunisien, Dietrich Reimer, Berlin, 1985.
This study was funded by Research Group RNM179 of the Junta [27] K.S.W. Sing, D.H. Everett, R.A.W. Haul, L. Moscou, R.A. Pierotti, J. Rouquerol, T.
de Andalucía and by Research Project MAT2012-34473. The Siemieniewska, Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with
special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity, Pure
research benefited by funding from INPS – Gestione Ex Inpdap Appl. Chem., IUPAC 57 (4) (1985) 603–619.
(Direzione Regionale Veneto), which provided the PhD ‘‘Doctor J” [28] S. Storck, H. Bretinger, W.F. Maier, Characterization of micro- and mesoporous
Grant over the period 2013-2015. The authors are grateful to solids by physisorption methods and pore-size analysis, Appl. Catal. A 174
(1998) 137–146.
SanMarco-Terreal factory, in particular to Franco Favaro and
[29] G. Cultrone, E. Sebastián, Fly ash addition in clayey materials to improve the
Francesco Stangherlin, and to Gabriel Walton who revised the quality of solid bricks, Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (2009) 1178–1184.
English text. [30] M. Dondi, M. Marsigli, I. Venturi, Microstructure and mechanical properties of
clay bricks: comparison between fast firing and traditional firing, Br. Ceram.
Trans. 98 (1999) 12–18.
References [31] K. Elert, G. Cultrone, C. Navarro, E. Sebastián Pardo, Durability of bricks used in
the conservation of historic buildings – influence of composition and
[1] M. Dondi, B. Fabbri, M. Marsigli, Rassegna delle esperienze di riciclaggio di microstructure, J. Cult. Heritage 4 (2003) 91–99.
scarti industriali e urbani nella produzione di laterizi, L’industria dei laterizi 51 [32] C. Coletti, G. Cultrone, L. Maritan, C. Mazzoli, How to face the new industrial
(1998) 160–178. challenge of compatible, sustainable brick production: study of various types
[2] M. Dondi, M. Marsigli, B. Fabbri, Recycling of industrial and urban wastes in of commercially available bricks, Appl. Clay Sci. 124–125 (2016) 219–226.
brick production – a review (Part I), Tile Brick Int. 13 (1997) 218–225. [33] G. Scherer, Crystallization in pores, Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (1999) 1347–1358.
[3] M. Dondi, M. Marsigli, B. Fabbri, Recycling of industrial and urban wastes in [34] A. Arnold, K. Zehnder, Salt weathering on monuments, in: The Conservation of
brick production – a review (Part 2), Tile Brick Int. 13 (1997) 302–309. Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin: The influence of coastal environment
[4] I. Demir, Effect of organic residues addition on the technological properties of and salt spray on limestone and marble, Proceedings of 1st International
clay bricks, Waste Manage. 28 (2008) 622–627. Symposium, 1990, 31–58.
[5] S.P. Raut, R.V. Ralegaonkar, S.A. Mandavgane, Development of sustainable [35] J. Martínez-Martínez, D. Benavente, M. Gomez-Heras, L. Marco-Castaño, M.Á.
construction material using industrial and agricultural solid waste: a review of García-del-Cura, Non-linear decay of building stones during freeze–thaw
waste-create bricks, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2011) 4037–4042. weathering processes, Constr. Build. Mater. 38 (2013) 443–454.
[6] L. Zhang, Production of bricks from waste materials – a review, Constr. Build. [36] D. Benavente, L. Linares-Fernández, G. Cultrone, E. Sebastián, Influence of
Mater. 47 (2013) 643–655. microstructure on the resistance to salt crystallisation damage in brick, Mater.
[7] P. Muñoz Velasco, M.P. Morales Ortíz, M.A. Mendívil Giró, L. Muñoz Velasco, Struct. 39 (2006) 105–113.
Fired clay bricks manufactured by adding wastes as sustainable construction [37] A. Ravaglioli, Evaluation of the frost resistance of pressed ceramic product
material – a review, Constr. Build. Mater. 63 (2014) 97–107. based on the dimensional distribution of pores, Trans. Br. Ceram. Soc. 75
[8] S. Neves Monteiro, C.M. Fontes Vieira, On the production of fired clay bricks (1976) 92–95.
from waste materials: a critical update, Constr. Build. Mater. 68 (2014) 599– [38] K. Ikeda, H.-S. Kim, K. Jaizu, A. Higashi, Influence of firing temperature on frost
610. resistance of roofing tiles, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24 (2004) 3671–3677.
[9] C. Bories, M.E. Borredon, E. Vedrenne, G. Vilarem, Development of eco-friendly [39] M.I. Sánchez de Rojas, F.P. Marín, M. Frías, E. Valenzuela, O. Rodríguez,
porous fired clay bricks using pore-forming agents: a review, J. Environ. Influence of freezing test methods, composition and microstructure on frost
Manage. 143 (2014) 186–196. durability assessment of clay roofing tiles, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2011)
[10] J. Sancho, B. Fernández, J. Ayala, P. García, J.C. Recio, C. Rodríguez, J.L. Bernardo, 2888–2897.
Method of obtaining electrolytic manganese from ferroalloy production waste, [40] D.L. Whitney, B.W. Evans, Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals,
in: 1st Spanish National Conference on Advances in Materials Recycling and Am. Mineral. 95 (2010) 185–187.
Eco-Energy, Madrid, 2009.
[11] V.D. Scott, G. Love, Quantitative Electron Probe Microanalysis, John Wiley and
Sons, New York, 1983.