Life Orientation
Life Orientation
Snenhlanhla Mncube
Grade10L
Landbou Hoerskool
Table of Contents
Introduction pg 1
Activity 1 Data gathering pg 2
Activity 2 Data gathering pg 3
Findings pg 4-8
Conclusion pg 9
Bibliography pg 10
Introduction
In this project I will touch on
pressing matters dealing with
Social issues and Community
participation .Social issues like
unqual access to basic resources
,social issues are when the
important services like healthcare,
education, clean water, and
sanitation are not shared equally
among people, which causes
unfairness in society, limits
people’s chances to improve their
lives, and keeps poverty going.
ACTIVITY 1
Data
gathering
ACTIVITY 2
Data
gathering
ACTIVITY 2
FINDINGS
ACTIVITY 1
FINDINGS
1 2345
6789
1.1 I have chosen unequal access to basic Resources
,Unequal access to basic resources is a huge issue that
I've seen firsthand in our country. It's a problem that
isn't new, but it's been around forever, and it feels like
it's been ignored for too long. I believe it's time we start
talking about it more so we can finally find some real
solutions.
1.2
Spatial planning forced Black South Africans to live far
away from cities in townships and homelands. This made
it harder for them to access jobs, good schools, and
hospitals, and this inequality still exists today.
Education system is unequal. Schools in poorer areas lack
funding, good teachers, and resources, which limits
opportunities and keeps the cycle of poverty going.
Big gap between the rich and poor, people with low
incomes can't afford basic resources. This problem gets
worse due to poor-paying jobs and taxes that take a
bigger percentage from the poor than from the rich.
Colonialism set up systems that exploited countries for
their resources. This created unfair structures where a
small, powerful group got rich, while most people were
left without control over their own resources.
Having teased out some of the broader trends and implications of income and other inequalities
at the global level, the following sections turn to income inequality at the regional and country
levels.
The recent publication of the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID) (Solt
2009) allows us to compare the evolution of income inequality in a sample of 141 countries
from 1990-2008 using Gini indices (see Box 2 for a discussion on Gini indices).
16
Middle classes and poorer-income groups appear to be doing worse in both low- and high-
income countries—for the benefit of the richest quintile. This has generated debate on how
states need to meet the welfare needs of all of their citizens, including the middle classes
who are critical for nation building (Birdsall 2010). From an equity point of view, what is
clear is that growth and development should not only be “pro-rich,” as it tends to be now,
but ensure equitable outcomes for all. For lower-income countries, this implies evolving
from “poverty reduction” to “inclusive development” (Deacon 2010).
It is important to note that income inequality measures, which are often based on household
consumption, do not capture other household wealth, such as financial assets, real estate and
savings instruments that high income groups commonly possess. Some recent studies do
include metrics for wealth, and they offer an even more unequal depiction of our world (Table
11). For instance, ILO (2008:44) estimates that the global Gini index based on wealth was 89.2
in 2000, a number which is significantly higher than most measures of global income inequality.
And according to UNU-WIDER, the top ten percent of adults own 85 percent of global
household wealth; the average member of the top decile has nearly 3,000 times the mean
wealth of the bottom decile (Davies et al. 2008:7).
15
Looking at income distribution quintile estimates using recent data, some of the highest national
disparities are found in countries like Colombia, Nepal, Russia and Zambia, despite recent
governments’ efforts to address it, while some of the most equal societies are found in countries
like Australia, Azerbaijan, France and Sweden (Figure 17).
Figure 17. Snapshot of High and Low Inequality in Selected Countries, 2007 (or latest available)
(A) High Inequality (B) Low Inequality
Q5 Q5
Q4 Q4
Q3 Colombia Q3
Australia
Nepal
Q2 Azerbaijan
Russia Q2
Zambia France
Q1 Q1 Sweden
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Source: World Bank (2011), UNU-WIDER (2008) and Eurostat (2011)
Such differences could lead us to think that equality is a result of fast or sustained GDP growth
over long periods of time. However, this is not necessarily the case. Income distribution data in
China, India and the United States, which have ranked among the largest and strongest growing
economies in the world over the past decades, suggest otherwise (Figure 18). In all three cases,
significant and sustained economic growth (annual GDP per capita growth of 9.8, 6.0 and 3.1
percent, respectively, between 1990 and 2005) has not led to more equal societies, but rather
made the rich relatively richer and the poor relatively poorer (see top and bottom quintiles).
Figure 18. GDP Growth and High Inequality in Selected Countries, 1990-2005
(A)China (B)India (C) United States
Q5 Q5 Q5
Q4 Q4 Q4
Q3 Q3 Q3 1990
Q2 Q2 Q2
1995
2000
Q1 Q1 Q1
2005
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
Source: World Bank (2011) and UNU-WIDER (2008)
22
AGO
60
HTI BOLPERG TMPH NNGD
COL ECU ZMB CPBVW A
NPL LKBERN PRY
COGRE UX NIJCAM
B SBDAGO
RLSSNU
PA AM B RCHL
WFO
50 CIV M ZM BTN
S SLV CRI
LA
NLKGA NTUER CDHSGLE
MKNRWA URYHKG
ZAR EB PHL CMMR HM ARG GAB
TCD BGDV ENITRHNA
UGGAE O
AR ARMGHTATUKMNMOZ
MDMAKDSETTOVNMDJI
JORM WMILI SGP
GINY EM KGGNZB ZA MYS LVA
40 ISURZB
D ZAID N SRB TN BENG UKBSA
RAZ LTJUPNPR T
IND TGO LAO
BDI TJK EBGIHY EASLBUKRROGMM RBNCGG
R ITA AUS
R EST CANNZL
PAK P AHODLEUICRH
TABIP LE
ETH KO HFCRRYV
AP
HUNN LD LUX
30 BLR BEL AUFTIN
DCSNZ
VEKN
SVSKW NEO R
AZE
20
10
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
In addition to poorer growth, more health and social problems, and greater political instability,
income inequality is also associated with graver social inequalities, among children in particular.
UNICEF’s 2010 Report Card 9 (UNICEF 2010a)9 offers a compelling analysis of social inequalities
in terms of child well-being by assessing three dimensions of inequality—including material,
education and health—among a sample of rich countries. Given our interest in understanding
the relationship between income and different social disparities, we adjust the overall child
equality score by removing the material indicator and re-calculating country scores based on
education and health scores alone.10 This gives us a good estimate for levels of basic education
and health inequality among 24 OECD countries, which we then compare to income inequality
as measured by Gini index values (Figure 24). The data reveal a strong negative relationship
between greater income inequality and lower levels of education and health inequalities as
experienced by children (ρ = -0.28).
9
The Report Card series is founded on the premise that a country’s real economic and social progress is gauged by
how well it cares for its children—their health and safety, material security, education and socialization, and
inclusion in society, among others.
10
National education scores are based on literacy in reading, math and science, and national health scores reflect
self-reported health complaints, healthy eating and physical activity.
27
2.3Mission: "
Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for
Humanity brings people together to build homes,
communities and hope."
Vision: "A world where everyone has a decent
place to live."
2.4
The Scale of the Housing Crisis: South Africa has a massive
housing backlog, with millions of households in need of
decent homes. Habitat for Humanity, despite its significant
efforts, is a non-profit organization and cannot keep up with
the sheer demand for housing across the country.
Funding and Resources: As a non-profit, the organization
relies on donations, grants, and volunteer labor to fund its
projects. This can be inconsistent, and challenges like high
construction costs (for example, due to rising prices for
materials like lumber) and a lack of volunteers can impact
their ability to build.
2.5 Habitat for Humanity was founded by Millard and
Linda Fuller in 1976
The organization's founding was the culmination of an
idea called "partnership housing" that the Fullers
developed while living at Koinonia Farm, a Christian
community in Georgia. They later took this concept to
Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo)
before returning to the United States to formally
establish Habitat for Humanity.
2.6 The organisation is funded by donations ,Habitat for
Humanity gets its funding from a mix of sources. They
get money from donations by individuals and
corporations and also rely on a revolving fund where no-
interest loans from homeowners are paid back and then
used to build more homes. Additionally, they partner
with governments and depend on volunteer labor and
donated materials to keep costs low.