Royal Sundaram Insurance Co. LTD.: 1.1 Industry Profile
Royal Sundaram Insurance Co. LTD.: 1.1 Industry Profile
1850
The advent of General Insurance in India with the establishment of Triton Insurance Company Ltd in Calcutta
1870
1907
1912
The Indian Life Assurance Companies Act, 1912 was the first statutory measure to regulate life business.
1928
1956
Nationalization of Life Insurance Sector and Life Insurance Corporation .The LIC absorbed 154 Indian, 16 non-Indian insurers as also 75 provident societies.
1971
1973
General insurance business was nationalized with effect from 1st January 1973. 107 insurers were amalgamated and grouped into four companies namely:
1) National Insurance Company Ltd., 2) The New India Assurance Company Ltd., 3) The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 3
Insurance Industry had 16 new entrants, 10 in Life and 6 in General Insurance Insurance Industry had 5 new entrants, 2 in Life and 3 in General
2003-04
Insurance Industry had 1new entrant, Sahara India Insurance Company Ltd. In Life Insurance category
2004-05
Insurance Industry had 1new entrant, Shri Ram Insurance company Ltd. In Life Insurance category
2005-06
Bharti Axa Life insurance company was granted Certification of Registration in July
2006
Bharti Axa Life insurance company commenced its operations the newest player in the insurance sector.
Evolution of Non-Life insurance in India: The boycott of British goods and British institutions, which occurred because of the nationalist movement, encouraged formation of Indian-owned commercial and business houses. By 1907, the Indian mercantile the first of the long lasting general insurance companies to be established with Indian capital, had started functioning five offices, the New India, Vulcan, Jupiter, British India General and the Universal, were established in 1919 almost simultaneously for transacting general insurance business.
In 1928, prominent insurance men of Bombay met and formed the Indian insurance companies association to protect the interest of Indian insurers. Leaders of the insurance industry began to organize conferences, educate public on the benefit of insurance, focus attention on the annual remove of national wealth through invisible exports, and arise public interest in favour of Indian insurance. Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 4
In 1950, the planning commission was set up to formulate plans for successive five years. This five year plan brought about large scale economic development and increased insurance consciousness among the people. As insurance business increased the number of claims for compensation against losses also naturally increased. Settlement of too many large claims meant a severe demand on the funds of insurance companies. So to prevent this situation the practice of Reinsurance was adopted according to which insurers themselves reinsured portions of the insurances they had undertaken. So Indian insurance companies with their expanding business wanted to reinsure for which they had to seek foreign reinsurance markets.
Since the need for conserving foreign exchange was felt in India all the insurers in India as well as foreigners operating in India formed the India Reinsurance Corporation in 1956. This corporation provided reinsurance facilities. It was compulsory for insurers in India to reinsure a fixed percentage of their insurances with the corporation. The Insurance Amendment Act 1950 imposed certain limitations on expenses of management. The general insurance council constituted what was called the tariff committee to control and regulate terms and conditions of business.
In 1972, the General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act 1972 was passed under the provisions of this act. The general insurance corporation of India was established for the purpose of directing, controlling and caring on the general insurance business and all the 106 insurers were merged and grouped into four subsidiaries of the general insurance corporation of India namely: National Insurance Company Ltd., with its head office at Calcutta. The New India Assurance Company Ltd., with its head office at Bombay. The Oriental Insurance company Ltd., with its head office at Delhi. The United India Insurance Company Ltd., with its head office at Madras. Three Phases of De-Tariffing Indias general insurance industry has undergone de-tariffing in three phases: Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 5
Page 6
Royal Sundaram Limited was started as a subsidiary of MMGI to provide customers with a range of finance and hire-purchase options for Light, Medium & Heavy Commercial Vehicles, Cars, Jeeps, Machinery and Equipment. It has over 50 years of experience in operation, and is recognized as one of the most trusted and respected NBFC's in India. The company continues to enjoy highest credit rating of AAA from leading rating agencies in the country. Royal Sundaram has a Nation-wide presence with over 167 branches, 650,000 depositors and nearly 100,000 commercial vehicle and car finance customers.
Royal is one of the most well known and oldest insurance companies in the world, having begun its operations in 1710. With an almost 300 year heritage, RSA is one of the worlds leading multinational quoted insurance groups. It has the capability to write business in over 130 countries and with major operations in the UK, Scandinavia, Canada, Ireland, Asia and the Middle East and Latin America. Focusing on general insurance, it has around 22,000 employees and in 2007, its net written premium were 5.8bn
Royal Sundaram is a joint venture between Sundaram Finance Ltd., and Royal & Sun Alliance and in April 2000, a letter of undertaking was signed to establish a joint venture Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 7
Royal Sundaram was formally launched as a company on 12th March 2001. Since then the company have been innovating constantly for its customers. Like being the first to offer cashless hospitalization, the first to offer segment specific business solutions, first to offer co-branded credit cards, first to introduce industry-specific proposition. Their product range is designed to provide extra cover to a varied range of customers starting from the common man to corporate conglomerates. The company is now in the eighth year of operation. The shareholders of Royal Sundaram are as follows: Sundaram and Associates 74% Royal and Sun London 26%
Working from a corporate office in Chennai, Royal Sundaram has been carrying out its business in over 150 cities with four fully operational Regional Centers in Chennai, Mumbai, Guargaon and Kolkata supported by a network of 35 Branch Offices. Each of these Regional Offices is staffed by a team of insurance professionals responsible for Customer Servicing, Business Development, Underwriting, Operations and Claims Management.
Royal and Sun London brings the golden heritage and reliability of Sundaram (AAA), one of the most respected non-banking financial institution in India, and RSA, one of the oldest and the second largest general insurer in the UK. The coming together of these two financial giants allows them to offer its customers the best global practices in insurance industry, innovation in terms of products and services, and unmatched, personalized customer service.
Page 8
Page 9
Machinery Breakdown Insurance [COMPANY NAME] extend its hand offering Machinery Breakdown Insurance Cover ably supported by most capable technocrats to throw more light about the mechanical side of all machines. Marine-Cum-Erection Insurance It is developed as a comprehensive product to manage the risk and insurance needs in course of erection as well as during transit. It is a combination of Erection-All-Risks and Marine Insurance to cater to the needs of the client where Marine/Transit insurance is connected with Erection All Risks Insurance of any project. Contractor's Plant & Machinery Contractor's Plant & Machinery is an exclusive all risks policy covering the plant & machinery used by the contractors at the site for various projects. It covers the property whether they are at work or at rest or being dismantled for the purpose of cleaning or overhauling, or in the course of operations or when being shifted within the premises or during subsequent re-erection, but in any case only after successful commissioning.
Liability Insurance: Product Liability Insurance Liability arises from a civil wrong or breach of personal duty imposed by law on a person and owed to his/her fellow citizens. In some countries legal rights and duties are framed in a Civil Code. In others they are not codified but drawn from the precedent of decisions handed down in the courts over the centuries; this is known as "Common Law". Workmen's Compensation Insurance It provides Insurance against occupational accident or disease to an employee whilst in course of his employment.
Page 10
Public Liability Act It provides indemnity against the Insured's liability at law to the public in general (excluding employees) for bodily injury and loss of or damage to property due to the business activities carried on in insured's premises. Business solutions: Industrial All Risks Policy Its a wide and comprehensive cover for the large sized business where the assets at all locations of the insured exceed Rs.100 Corers. It is an All Risks Policy covering a wide range of perils such as fire and allied perils, burglary, accidental damage, breakdown as well as business interruption. Office Shield A flexible policy specifically designed to meet the insurance needs of your modern office, irrespective of the number of locations. Hotel Shield Tailor-made cover designed to suit the specific needs of the Hotel Industry. Enterprise Shield. It is a newly devised package providing total insurance solutions for industries. You do not need to analyze and evaluate a large number of insurance policies to insure your business completely. Education Shield Tailor-made cover designed to suit the specific needs of Education Industry. Traders Shield It is an attractive policy that provides shopkeepers with a basic insurance package and a further range of optional covers. Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 11
All Risks Policy for Portable Equipments It offers an overall solution to cover portable items like laptops, mobiles, cameras and projectors. Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy It offers cover against fire and allied perils and the perils of nature. The policy can cover building (including plinth and foundation), plant and machinery, stocks, furniture, fixtures and fittings and other contents. Consequential Loss (Fire) Insurance It provides protection against loss of profits in business due to an interruption in business consequent upon an insured peril covered under the material damage policy. Employee solutions: Group Personal Accident Policy It is a worldwide cover providing protection for the employees against any accidental injuries sustained by the individuals resulting in death and disablement. Group Health Health Premium Platinum is a comprehensive health insurance package, designed for the employees of company and their family members. Workmen's Compensation Workmen's Compensation provides cover to target clients as required by law in support to project insurances or property insurances.
Page 12
Page 13
To compare the performance of Royal Sundaram with other competitors in the general insurance industry.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
To identify the position Royal Sundaram holds among other private players. To find out the strengths and weaknesses of the companys insurance schemes To study consumers awareness towards insurance products To identify the customers perception about the company and its products.
Page 14
The outcome of the study, which are based on the above aspects can be utilized by the marketing department of both life and non-life insurance companies.
Page 15
The survey conducted may not be considered as comprehensive as only limited respondents could be contacted because of the time constraint.
Objectives and the purposes of the study and the questions had to be explained to the respondents and their responses may be biased.
Only limited sample size had been considered for the study and therefore, the conclusions drawn based on this may not be a reflection of the entire population.
Page 16
Page 17
Operational Flexibility The public entities lack the operational flexibility enjoyed by the private players. Their limited capacity to innovate has impacted their ability to tailor and aggressively price Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 18
Client Servicing The public insurers have also been hampered in claims servicing by their process oriented approach and limited operational flexibility. They have been unable to expedite claim settlements through out-of-court negotiations since a large proportion of their claims pertain to the third party motor segment, which is subject to adjudication by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal. The result is a time-consuming and involved process.
Strong Infrastructure and Systems Private players are not hindered by their charters or legacy systems and have constructed technologically advanced infrastructure. They started with large investments in technology, which helped them to build robust data management systems. This characteristic enables in turn quick and effective decision-making for pricing and claims settlements, attributes vital to building franchises. On the other hand, public entities have only recently upgraded their systems and have to grapple with transition issues, such as moving from paper to paper-less systems. They are encumbered by legacy systems and fragmented databases, and have not fully used their past claim experiences, something which could give them a strong pricing edge in a detariffed environment.
Focused Underwriting Strategy The private players, especially during their initial years, have selectively targeted the more profitable lines of the public sector companies for growth. They benefit from the experiences of the public sector as well as their international joint-venture partners. They have drawn talent from public sector companies.
Page 19
Page 20
Descriptive Research Design The type of research design used in this study is the descriptive research. The main characteristics of this method is that the researcher has no control over the variables and he can only report what has happened or what is happening. This study which compares the performance of Royal Sundaram with its industrial competitors has been undertaken based on the opinions of the consumers. Hence, this research study is categorized as Descriptive Research Method
DATA COLLECTION The main source of information for this study is based on the data collection. Data collected are both primary and secondary in nature. Primary Data Primary data have been directly collected from the clients of Royal Sundaram as well from the clients of other insurance companies by survey method through undisguised structured questionnaire. Questions like open ended, close ended, multiple choice, dichotomous and ranking type have been used for the purpose of data collection. Secondary Data Secondary data have been collected from official website of Royal Sundaram and also from other official websites related to general insurance industry
Page 21
Likert scale
It uses 5 point or 7 point scale to elicit respondents favor or unfavor towards an object. Dichotomous question It consists of two choices of answers in which the respondent has to choose one of them. Ranking In ranking, questions will have the ranking skill, which the respondents are free to rank them according to their preference.
SAMPLING Convenience sampling is been used in the study. This type of sampling is basically used when you simply stop anybody in the street who is prepared to stop, or when you wander round a business, a shop, a restaurant, a theatre or whatever, asking people you meet whether they will answer your questions. In other words, the sample comprises subjects who are simply available in a convenient way to the researcher. There is no randomness and the likelihood of bias is high. You can't draw any meaningful conclusions from the results you obtain. Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 22
Chi-square test Weighted average method Interval estimation Karl Pearsons coefficient of correlation H-test Graph Percentage
1. CHI-SQUARE TEST There may be situation in which it is not possible to make any rigid assumption about distribution of the population from which samples being drawn. This limitation has led to the development of a group of alternative techniques known as non-parametric tests. Chi-square describes the magnitude of the discrepancy between theory and observation. n = [(Oi Ei) 2] with n-1 degrees of freedom Unitedworld School Of Business Page 23 Nirali Tusharchandra Desai
3. INTERVAL ESTIMATION METHOD An estimation of a population parameter given by 2 numbers between when the parameter may be considered to lie is called interval estimation of the parameter. ( p - z pq ; p + z pq ) n n p = sample proportion of success q = sample proportion of failure z = standard variance of the confidence level n = no. of sample size 3. KARL PEARSONS COEFFICIENT OF CORRELATION Correlation analysis helps us in determining the degree of relationship between 2 or more variables. The value of the coefficient of correlation as obtained by the below formula shall always lie between +1 and -1. When r = +1, it means there is perfect positive correlation between the variables. When r = -1, there is perfect negative correlation between the variables and when r = 0, there is no relationship between the two variables. xy r = -------------------_________ x2 - y2 __ __ Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 24
6. GRAPHS Graphical method was used in order to represent the factor in various graphical methods like pie-chart, bar diagram and cylinder.
Page 25
Findings: The above table shows that 35.83% of the respondents belong to the age group of less than 25 years, 26.67% fall under the category of 25-35 years, 16.67% belong to the age group of 35-45 years, 10% belong to the age group of 45-55 years and the rest 10.83% above 55 years Inference: It is inferred that there is a higher percentage (i.e. 35.83%) of respondents in the age group of less than 25 years and comparatively very lower percentage (i.e. 10%) of respondents in the age group of 45-55 years
40 35 30 25 No. of 20 respondents 15 10 5 0
35-45
45-55
Above 55 yrs
Age in years
Page 26
Findings: The above table shows that 67.5% of respondents are male and 32.5% are female respondents Inference: It is inferred that there is a higher percentage (i.e. 67.5%) of male respondents.
67.5 70
No.of respondents
Page 27
Findings: The above table shows that 20.83% of respondents belong to the category of services, 13.33% are government employees, 19.17% belong to the category of business, 15.83% are professional and the rest 30.83% belong to other category, which comprises of private sector employee Inference: It is inferred that there is a higher percentage (i.e.30.83%) of respondents in the category comprising private sector employees.
35
No. of respondents
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Service Govt. employee Business occupation Professional Others 20.83 13.33 19.17 15.83
Page 28
Findings: The above table shows that 75.83% of respondents have 2-4 members in their family and the rest 24.17% of respondents have 5-8 members in their family. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (75.83%) of respondents have 2-4 members in their family
More than 8
5 to 8
24.17
2 to 4 0 20 40 No.of respondents 60
75.83
80
Page 29
Findings: The above table shows that 25.83% of respondents fall under the income category of less than 2 lakhs, 42.5% fall under the category of 2-5 lakhs, 16.67% fall under the income category of 5-10 lakhs, 7.5% in the category of 10-20 lakhs and the rest 7.5% in the income category above 20 lakhs Inference: It is inferred that there is a higher percentage (42.5%) of respondents in the income category of 2-5 lakhs and comparatively a very lower percentage (7.5%) of respondents in the income category of 10-20 lakhs and above 20 lakhs
45 40
No. of respondents
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Less than Rs.2-5 lakhs Rs.2 lakhs Rs.5 -10 lakhs Rs.10-20 lakhs Above Rs.20 lakhs 7.5 7.5 25.83 16.67
Annual Income
Page 30
Findings: The above table shows that 100% of respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram and 100% who are policy holders with other companies, have responded that it is necessary to have a general insurance cover. Inference: It is inferred that all the respondents surveyed have stated that it is necessary to have a general insurance cover.
60
Page 31
Findings: The above table shows that 51.67% of respondents hold 1 policy, 34.17% holds 2 to 4 policies and the rest 14.17% holds more than 4 general insurance policies. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (51.67%) of respondents holds 1 general insurance policy.
51.67 60
No.of respondents
50 40 30 20 10 0 1
34.17 14.17
2 to 4 No.of policies
More than 4
Page 32
Findings: The above table shows that 55% of respondents hold general insurance policy with the same company and 45% of respondents hold it in various other companies. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (55%) of respondents holds general insurance policy with the same company.
3.2.8 CHART SHOWING WHETHER THE GENERAL INSURANCE POLICIES ARE TAKEN FROM THE SAME COMPANY
55 60
No.of respondents
45
50 40 30 20 10 0 Yes No
Page 33
No. of respondents who have taken policies from the same company: 66 No. of respondents who have not taken policies from the same company: 54 n = sample size = 120 p= Number of yes = 66 = .55 Sample size 120 q = 1-p = 1-.55 = .45 Z / 2 = 1.96 at 95% confidence level __________ pq Standard error = = .55 * .45 = 0.0454 n 120 Interval estimation= p Z / 2 pq
n
Conclusion Hence, we conclude that the percentage of respondents who have taken policies from the same company lies between 46.1% to 63.9%.
Page 34
3.2.9 TABLE SHOWING NO.OF COMPANIES IN WHICH RESPONDENT IS A POLICY HOLDER S.No 1 2 3 No. of companies 2 companies 2-5 More than 5 companies Total No. Of Respondents 43 10 1 54 Percentage (%) 79.63 18.52 1.85 100
Findings: The above table shows that 79.63% of respondents are policy holders in 2 companies, 18.52% of respondents are policy holders in 2-5 companies and the rest 1.85% of respondents are policy holders in more than 5 companies. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage of respondents (79.63%) are policy holders in at least 2 companies.
79.63 80
No.of respondents
Page 35
3.2.10 TABLE SHOWING COMPANIES ENJOYING HIGH REPUTATION AMIDST CUSTOMERS. S.No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Companies Royal Sundaram TATA AIG Bajaj Allianz Iffco tokio ICICI Reliance Others Total No. Of Respondents 47 13 15 8 12 14 11 120 Percentage (%) 39.17 10.83 12.5 6.67 10 11.67 9.17 100
Findings: The above table shows that 39.17% of respondents have stated [COMPANY NAME], 10.83% have stated TATA AIG, 12.5% have stated Bajaj Allianz, 6.67% have stated Iffco Tokio, 10% of them have stated ICICI, 11.6% of them have stated Reliance and the rest 9.17% of them have stated other companies like Cholamandalam and Public sector insurance companies Inference: It is inferred that higher reputation amidst customers is enjoyed by Royal Sundaram with 39.17% of respondents stating it.
Page 36
Others 9% Reliance 12% ICICI 10% Iffco tokio 7% Bajaj Allianz 12% TATA AIG 11% Royal Sundaram 39%
Page 37
3.2.11 TABLE SHOWING AWARENESS AMONGST [COMPANY NAME] CUSTOMERS TOWARDS THE INSURANCE SCHEMES OFFERED BY [COMPANY NAME] S.No 1 2 Awareness Yes No Total No. Of Respondents 45 15 60 Percentage (%) 75 25 100
Findings: The above table shows that 75% of respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram, have stated that they are aware of various insurance schemes offered by Royal Sundaram, and the rest 25% of respondents who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram, have stated that they are not aware of all the insurance schemes offered by the company Inference: It is inferred that higher percentage (75%) of respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram, are aware of various insurance schemes offered by the company. 3.2.11 CHART SHOWING AWARENESS AMONGST ROYAL
Page 38
25
Yes No
75
INTERVAL ESTIMATION: AWARENESS AMONGST ROYAL SUNDARAM CUSTOMERS TOWARDS THE INSURANCE SCHEMES OFFERED BY ROYAL SUNDARAM Formula:
p Z/2 pq n
No. of Royal Sundaram customers who are aware of various insurance schemes offered by [COMPANY NAME]: 45
No. of Royal Sundaram customers who are aware of various insurance schemes offered by Royal Sundaram: 15 n = sample size = 60 p= Number of yes = 45 = .75 Sample size 60 q = 1-p = 1-.75 = .25 Z / 2 = 1.96 at 95% confidence level __________ Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 39
.75 * .25 60
= 0.056
Interval estimation= p Z / 2 pq
n
= (0.75 1.96(0.056) = 0.64024>p>0.8598 = 64.02%, 85.98% Conclusion Hence we conclude that the percentage of respondents aware of various insurance schemes offered by Royal Sundaram lies between 64.02% to 85.98% 3.2.12 TABLE SHOWING RESPONDENTS OPINION TOWARDS ROYAL SUNDARAMS OFFERING OF CUSTOMER CENTRIC PRODUCTS
S.No 1 2 3 4 5
Opinion Highly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Highly disagree Total
No. Of Respondents 5 48 5 2 60
Findings: The above table shows that 8.3% of respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram highly agree, 80% of them just agree, 8.3% of them neither agree nor disagree and the rest 3.3% of them disagree that Royal Sundaram is known for offering customer-centric products. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (80%) of respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram have agreed that Royal Sundaram is well known for offering customer centric products. Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 40
Highly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Highly agree
No.of respondents
3.2.13 TABLE SHOWING THE RESPONDENTS COMMENT ON THE SERVICE OF ROYAL SUNDARAM S.No 1 2 3 4 5 Comment Excellent Very good Moderate Poor Very poor Total No. Of Respondents 23 30 7 60 Percentage (%) 38.33 50 11.67 100
Findings: The above table shows that 38.33% of respondents have indicated the service of Royal Sundaram as excellent, and 50% of them have stated it as very good and 11.67% of them have indicated it as moderate. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (50%) of respondents have indicated that the service rendered by Royal Sundaram as very good.
Page 41
60 50 50
No. of respondents
40 30 20
38.33
3.2.14 TABLE SHOWING SOURCES BY WHICH THE RESPONDENTS BECAME FAMILIAR OF ROYAL SUNDARAM S.No 1 2 3 4 Source of information Ads (print, radio, TV) Insurance agents Friends & Relatives Others Total No. Of Respondents 21 14 25 60 Percentage (%) 35 23.33 41.67 100
Findings: The above table shows that 35% of respondents have indicated advertisement, 23.33% of them have stated insurance agents and 41.67% of them have indicated friends & relatives as means by which they came to know about Royal Sundaram. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (41.67%) of respondents has indicated friends and relatives as means by which they came to know about Royal Sundaram.
Page 42
3.2.15 TABLE SHOWING THE PERIOD OF INSURANCE COVER HELD BY RESPONDENTS. S.No 1 2 3 4 5 Period of insurance cover Annual policy 1-5 year 5-10 year 10-15 year Greater than 15 years Total No. Of Respondents 61 35 11 13 120 Percentage (%) 50.83 29.17 9.17 10.83 100
Findings: The above table shows that 50.83% of respondents hold annual policy, 29.17% of them hold 1-5 year policy cover, 9% of them hold 5-10year policy and 10.83% of them hold 10-15 year policy. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (50.83%) of respondents holds annual policy. Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 43
greater than 5 years 10-15 year 5-10 year 1-5 year Annual policy
No.of respondents
3.2.16 TABLE SHOWING THE AMOUNT OF YEARLY INSURANCE PREMIUM PAID S.No 1 2 3 4 Yearly premium paid Less than Rs.5000 Rs.5000-15000 Rs.15000-25000 Greater than Rs.25000 Total No. Of Respondents 43 58 12 7 120 Percentage (%) 35.83 48.33 10 5.83 100
Findings: The above table shows that 35.83% of respondents have been paying insurance premium less than Rs.5000 yearly, 48.330% of them have been paying premium between Rs.5000-15000 yearly, 10% of them have been paying between Rs.15000-25000 as yearly premium and 5.83% of them have been paying more than Rs.25000 as yearly premium. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage of respondents (48.3%) have been paying yearly insurance premium between Rs.5000-15000 Nirali Tusharchandra Desai Unitedworld School Of Business Page 44
5.83 10 48.33
35.83 10 20 30 40 50
No.of respondents
Page 45
Annual income
Rs.2-5 lakhs 51
Rs.5-10 lakhs 20
Rs.10-20 lakhs 9
No. of respondents
31
xy r = -------------------_________ x2 - y2 __ __ x = (X - X) ; y = (Y - Y)
Page 46
r=
= .8433
Conclusion: The variables annual income and premium amount paid are positively correlated. Hence, the annual income has an impact on the premium amount paid.
Page 47
S.No
Comment
1 2 3 4 5
39 21 60
Findings: The above table shows that 65% of respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram have stated that the yearly premium paid, is high and the rest 35% of them have stated it is reasonable. Amongst the respondents, who are policy holders with other companies 20% of them have stated that the yearly premium being paid is high and the rest 80% of them have stated that it is reasonable. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (65%) of policy holders of Royal Sundaram feel that the premium paid is high and only 20% of policy holders of other companies have stated it is high
Page 48
no. of respondents
reasonable
very low
high
low
Page 49
Ho:
There is no significant difference between premium and period of general insurance policy
H1:
There is a significant difference between premium and period of general insurance policy
Table of expected frequency: Expected Value = row total * column total Grand total 0 0 0 0 0 Formulae: 25.925 14.875 4.675 5.525 0 35.075 20.125 6.325 7.475 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
S.No
Satisfactory level
Percentage (%) RSA 13.3 78.3 8.3 Other cos. 8.3 88.3 3.3
1 2 3
8 47 5
4 5
60
60
100
100
Findings: The above table shows that among policy holders of Royal Sundaram 13.3% of them are highly satisfied with the policy taken, 78.3% of them are just satisfied and the rest 8.3% of them are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the policy taken. Among policy holders of other companies, 8.3% of them are highly satisfied, 88.3% of them are highly satisfied and the rest 3.35% of them are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with the policy taken. Inference: It is inferred that among the policy holders of Royal Sundaram, higher percentage (78.3%) of them feel that they are satisfied and 13.3% of them are highly satisfied with the policy taken. Among other policy holders, a higher percentage (88.3%) of them also feels that they are satisfied and 8.3% of them feel that they are highly satisfied with the policy taken.
Page 53
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
no. of respondents
88.3 78.3
8.3
satisfactory
8.3
3.3
0 0
dissatisfactory
0 0
highly dissatisfactory
highly satisfactory
Page 54
Ho:
There is no significant difference between yearly premium paid and satisfactory level towards general insurance policy taken
H1:
There is a significant difference between yearly premium paid and satisfactory level towards general insurance policy taken
Table of expected frequency: Expected Value = row total * column total Grand total 4.6583 6.283 1.3 .7583 Nirali Tusharchandra Desai 35.83 48.3 10 5.83 2.5083 3.383 .07 .4083 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 55
Formulae: = [(Oi Ei) 2] with n-1 degrees of freedom i =1 Ei Oi 3 38 2 0 0 0 57 1 0 0 7 3 2 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 Ei 4.6583 35.83 2.5083 0 0 6.283 48.3 3.383 0 0 1.3 10 .07 0 0 .7583 5.83 .4083 0 0 Total (Oi-Ei)2 2.75 4.7089 0.2584 0 0 39.48 75.69 5.68 0 0 32.49 49 3.725 0 0 5.025 14.67 2.5335 0 0 (Oi-Ei)2/Ei 0.5903 0.1314 0.1030 0 0 6.283 1.57 1.68 0 0 24.99 4.9 53.214 0 0 6.63 2.5163 6.205 0 0 108.813
Page 56
cal = 108.813 0.05 with (n-1) (n-1) = (5-1) (4-1) = 12 0.05 with 12 d.f = 21.0 cal > 0.05
Hence, we reject ho
Conclusion: We conclude that there is a significant difference between yearly premium paid and satisfactory level towards general insurance policy taken.
Page 57
S.No
Opinion
Percentage (%) RSA 51.67 48.33 100 Other co. 51.67 48.33 100
1 2
Yes No Total
31 29 60
Findings: The above table shows that 51.67% of respondents among both Royal Sundaram and other companies have insurance agents and the rest 48.33% of respondents among both Royal Sundaram and other companies do not have an insurance agent. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage (51.67%) of respondents among both Royal Sundaram and other companies has insurance agents.
No.of respondents
Page 58
No. of respondents having insurance agents: 62 No. of respondents not having insurance agents: 58 n = sample size = 120 p= Number of yes = 62 = .5166 Sample size 120 q = 1-p = 1-.5166 = .4834 Z / 2 = 1.96 at 95% confidence level ______________ pq Standard error = = .5166 * .4834 = 0.0456 n 120 Interval estimation= p Z / 2 pq
n
= (0.5166 1.96(0.0456) = 0.4272>p>0.606 = 42.72%, 60.6% Conclusion Hence we conclude that the percentage of respondents having insurance agents lies between 42.72% to 60.6%
Page 59
Findings: The above table shows that 25.8% of respondents among Royal Sundaram and 6.5% of respondents among other companies have indicated that the guidance rendered by their insurance agent is excellent, 64.5% of respondents among Royal Sundaram and 51.6% of respondents of other companies have indicated that it is very good and the rest 9.7% of respondents from Royal Sundaram and 41.9% of respondents from other companies have indicated that it is moderate. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage of respondents from both Royal Sundaram (64.5%) and from other companies (51.6%) have indicated that the guidance rendered by their insurance agent is very good.
Page 60
70 60
64.5 51.6 41.9 Excellent Very good 25.8 Moderate Poor Very poor 0 OTHER CO. 0
No.of respondents
50 40 30 20 10 0 RSA
9.7 0 0
6.5
Page 61
Findings: The above table shows that 100% of respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram and 100% respondents, who are policy holders with other companies have stated that their claims were not rejected by the insurance companies. Inference: It is inferred that all the respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram as well with other companies have indicated that their claims were not rejected by the insurance companies.
100
No.of respondents
0 no
Page 62
APPLYING WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD 8 Influencing factors Reputation Excellent service/Responsiveness Easy accessibility Good schemes Low premium rates Heard of good experience of others Proper claim settlement Others 7 113 3.53 8 12 14 50 23 13 5 3 18.94 3 3 6 11 3 7 7 3 2 19 14 17 8 30 24 6 17 41 48 4 44 17 16 23 46 3 5 56 10.14 15.5 15.306 12.17 7 4 5 6 1 85 16 7 2 17 68 6 3 9 12 5 4 5 14 4 5 5 3 6 1 4 2 7 2 1 1 8 1 W.A 24.61 21.7 RANK 1 2
Page 63
30
No.of respondents
25 20 15 10 5
Excellent service/Responsiveness
Reputation
Good schemes
Easy accessibility
Others
Page 64
600
Page 65
100 90 80
no. of respondents
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Low premium
58
41
39
21 7 0 10 0
Money back guarantee
Highly dissatisfied
20
Easy access to agents
Page 66
APPLYING KRUSKAL WALLIS OR H TEST TO THE TABLE 3.2.23 Ho: Respondents satisfaction level towards all the attributes of general insurance cover taken is the same H1: Respondents satisfaction level towards all the attributes of general insurance cover taken is not the same.
Values
Ranks
1 2 3 7 7 9 9 10 10 13 21 21 26 39 41 58 62 83 86 92
Page 67
R1 = 41.5 ; R2 = 37.5 ; R3 = 42.5 ; R4 = 46 ; R5 = 43.5 Applying the formula for H: H = [12 / (N (N+1)) * (R12/ n1 + R22 / n2 + R32 / n3 + R42 / n4 + R52 / n5)] 3 (n + 1) H = [12 / (20 (20+1)) * (41.52/4 + 37.52/4 + 42.52/4 + 462/4 + 43.52/4)] 3 (20+1) = [(12/420) * (2235.75) 63 H = .8786
0.05 = 9.49
Since, 0.8786 < 9.49 We accept Ho.
Conclusion Hence, we conclude that the respondents satisfaction level towards all the attributes of general insurance cover taken is the same.
Page 68
Findings: The above table shows that 25.83% of respondents would prefer Ads, 36.67% of them prefer insurance agents, 35% of them prefer Friends & relatives, and the rest 2.5% of them would prefer other sources like company websites, SMS, etc, in order to know about an insurance company and its products. Inference: It is inferred that a higher percentage of respondents (36.67%) have stated insurance agents as the most preferred source. 3.2.24 CHART SHOWING THE SOURCES MOST PREFERRED BY RESPONDENTS TO KNOW ABOUT INSURANCE COMPANY AND ITS PRODUCTS
40 35
36.67
35
No.of respondents
30 25 20 15 10 5 0
25.83
2.5
Insurance agents
Others
Page 69
Page 70
Formulae: Average score = [(R1*8 + R2*7 + R3*6 + R4*5 + R5*4 + R6*3 +R7*2 + R8*1)] Total weights
Sample calculation: Average score = [(85*8 + 15*7 + 4*6 + 16*5 + 0*4 + 0*3 + 0*2 + 0*1)] 36 = 24.7
Page 71
3.2.25 CHART SHOWING GENERAL INSURANCE COVER THAT IS MOST FAVORED BY RESPONDENTS
No.of respondents
Auto/car insurance
Health insurance
Travel insurance
Householders insurance
Shopkeepers insurance
Page 72
Others
3.3 FINDINGS
It is found that there is a higher percentage (i.e. 35.83%) of respondents in the age group of less than 25 years and comparatively very lower percentage (i.e. 10%) of respondent belongs to the age group of 45-55 years.
There is a higher percentage (i.e. 67.5%) of male respondents among the respondents who has taken general insurance cover.
Majority of the respondents (i.e.30.83%), who has taken general insurance cover are private sector employees.
It is found that a higher percentage (75.83%) of respondents have 2-4 members in their family.
It is inferred that there is a higher percentage (42.5%) of respondents in the income category of 2-5 lakhs and comparatively a very lower percentage (7.5%) of respondents in the income category of 10-20 lakhs and above 20 lakhs
It is implied that all the respondents surveyed have stated that it is necessary to have a general insurance cover.
It is evident from the study conducted that majority (51.67%) of the respondents holds at least 1 general insurance policy.
The study discloses that 55% of respondents hold general insurance policy with the same company and the rest 45% of respondents hold it in various other companies.
Page 73
It is inferred that a higher percentage of respondents (79.63%) are policy holders in at least 2 companies, while18.52% of respondents are policy holders in 2-5 companies and the rest 1.85% of respondents are policy holders in more than 5 companies.
It is inferred that higher reputation amidst customers is enjoyed by Royal Sundaram with 39.17% of respondents stating it.
Majority of respondents (i.e., 75%), who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram have stated that they are aware of various insurance schemes offered by the company.
It is found that the percentage of respondents aware of various insurance schemes offered by Royal Sundaram lies between 64.02% and 85.98%
Majority of respondents (i.e., 80%), who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram have agreed that Royal Sundaram is well known for offering customer centric products.
It is inferred that a higher percentage (50%) of respondents have indicated that the service rendered by Royal Sundaram as very good, while 38.33% of respondents have indicated the service of Royal Sundaram as excellent, and the rest 11.67% of them have indicated it as moderate.
The study implies that a higher percentage (41.67%) of respondents has indicated friends and relatives, while 35% of respondents have indicated advertisement and the rest 23.33% of them have stated insurance agents as means by which they came to know about Royal Sundaram.
Page 74
Among the respondents, who are holding general insurance cover it is found that a higher percentage of respondents (48.3%) have been paying yearly insurance premium between Rs.5000-15000
With the application of Karl Pearsons Correlation Coefficient it is found that the variables annual income and premium amount paid are positively correlated.
Among the policy holders of Royal Sundaram, 65% of them feel that the premium being paid is high and among the policy holders of other companies only 20% have stated it as high.
According to the chi square test conducted, it is found that there is no significant difference between premium and period of general insurance policy.
It is inferred from the study that among the policy holders of Royal Sundaram, higher percentage (78.3%) of them feel that they are satisfied and 13.3% of them are highly satisfied with the policy taken. Among other policy holders, a higher percentage (88.3%) of them also feels that they are satisfied and 8.3% of them feel that they are highly satisfied with the policy taken.
It is found that there is a significant difference between yearly premium paid and satisfactory level towards general insurance policy taken, as per the chi-square test conducted.
The study conducted reveals that a higher percentage (51.67%) of policy holders among both Royal Sundaram and other companies has insurance agents.
Page 75
It is found that a higher percentage of respondents from both Royal Sundaram (64.5%) and from other companies (51.6%) have indicated that the guidance rendered by their insurance agent is very good.
It is inferred that all the respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram as well with other companies have indicated that their claims were not rejected by the insurance companies.
It is found that while selecting a particular insurance company to take a policy, majority of the respondents look out for reputation of the company first, secondly they look out for excellent service/responsiveness of the company, thirdly proper claim settlement of the company followed by good schemes, low premium rates, others good experience, and easy accessibility.
According to the result of the H-test, it is found that the respondents satisfaction level towards all the attributes of general insurance cover taken is the same.
Majority of respondents (36.67%) have stated insurance agents as the most preferred source to know about an insurance company and its products.
It is found that auto/car insurance is been ranked I by majority of respondents, health insurance ranked II, hospital cash insurance ranked III followed by personal accident insurance, householders insurance, travel insurance, shopkeepers insurance and other insurance covers (fire insurance, marine, rural insurance, etc) which are ranked as IV, V, VI, VII and VIII respectively.
Page 76
Majority of the respondents, who are policy holders with Royal Sundaram have felt that the premium being paid is comparatively higher with the premium rates of other insurance companies. Hence, amendments can be made in this regard by offering insurance cover at reasonable premium rates to the customers.
The promptness of claim settlement procedure can be maintained as it is one of the important aspects which would enhance the reputation of the company, as well as build trust in the minds of the customers. Also, it helps to retain existing customers and attract new customers.
The company has to focus more on the auto/car insurance segment and health insurance segment. Majority of the respondents have preference towards auto/car insurance as it is a must to have insurance for their vehicles by law. Therefore, the company has got enough opportunities to earn huge profits from both these segments.
The company can create more awareness about its products among potential customers by means of advertisements and efficient insurance agents, which in turn will help in increasing its customer base.
Page 77
The outcome of the study has proved that the performance of the company is outstanding in comparison with other competitors in the non-life insurance segment and that the company has a higher reputation among customers.
It is concluded that the company could initiate various steps based on the recommendations given in this report. The company by adopting some of the recommendations, if not all, can further improve its performance and occupy a leading position among other competitors in the non-life insurance market in future years to come.
Page 78