ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT OF
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
DEN433, DENM023
2013/14
Introduction
Queen Mary University of London
Lectures
Week
1
Lecture 1 Introduction
Background; Energy chain; Overview of sustainable systems
Lecture 2 Energy Technologies1
Schedulable energy sources; Tidal, wave & wind power
Lecture 3 Energy Technologies 2
Solar power; CHP; Energy storage;
Lecture 4 Energy Systems
Variability & intermittency. Back-up & Security;
Lecture 5 Energy Costs
Generation costs; Capacity strategies
Lecture 6 Demand and Supply
Determinants of demand & supply; Monopolies & Oligopolies
Reading Week
Phew!
Lecture 7 Energy Policy
Energy policy changes; New Energy Paradigm; Deregulation & investment
Lecture 8 Energy Pricing
Pricing/costing for multi-energy systems; Marginal analysis;
Energy pricing theory
10
Lecture 9 Design of Energy
Markets
Peak load capacity; electricity markets;
Emissions; Plant utilisation & pricing
11
Lecture 10 Demand & Load
Management
End-user demand management options; Metering; Smart
Grid
12
Lecture 11 Energy Trading
Pre-privatisation; Pool; NETA; International trends; Impact on
renewables
Reading list
Renewable Energy in Power Systems Freris & Infield; Wiley 2008
Renewable Energy; Boyle (ed); OUP 2012
Energy Systems and Sustainability; Everett et al (ed); OUP 2012
Renewables for power generation, status & prospects International Energy
Agency; OECD 2003
Sustainable energy without the hot air David JC McKay;
(http://www.withouthotair.com/about.html)
The New Energy Paradigm; ed Dieter Helm; Oxford 2007
Alternative Energy Systems & Applications; Hodge; Wiley 2009
Other sources will be given during the lectures
Coursework
Each of the two pieces of coursework represents 20% of the total marks for this
module.
Coursework must be submitted to the Office before 15.00hrs on:
Part 1
Monday 2nd March 2015
Part 2
Monday 20th April 2015
A copy must also be emailed to me on t.p.prout@qmul.ac.uk at the same time.
The coursework is intended to make you think about real life situations. Like
real life there are uncertainties which you will have to handle. You will also
have to research the properties and economics of sustainable energy
systems. Some of the information required will have to be guessed and
later refined as you learn more just like real life.
Revising for Examination
Revision
Lectures include a number of case study examples
You are expected to understand the underlying issues
from each case study
You are not expected to memorise the case studies!
Past examination papers are on the Intranet
Revision guidelines will be given in Week 11
Examination
Worth 60% of module
Answer 4 out of 6 questions
Each question worth 25 marks
Each question has typically 3-5 sub-questions
Note change in format from pre-2013 examination papers No Part A or Part B
Stuff you know already but . . .
Power
As in peak demand, plant
capacity, etc.
Energy
As in consumption, tariffs, etc.
1 MW
1 GW
1 TW
1 MWh = 1000 kWh
1 GWh = 1000 MWh
1 TWh = 1000 GWh
= 1000 kW
= 1000 MW
= 1000 GW
8760 hours in one year except for leap years!
Electricity demand challenge
Conventional fuels will continue
to dominate
Economic environment will affect
choice of fuel eg China and
coal
Challenge is to:
Improve economics of
renewable energy sources
Improve energy efficiency of
sustainable sources
Decrease greenhouse gas
emissions
Improve energy effectiveness
of power loads
New Energy Sources
New energy forms will impact on:
Relative cost differentials between fuels
Global political strategies
Fuel prices volatile due to:
Political uncertainties
Demand growth
Supply sources
Fuel prices why bother?
Cover/back-up for variable/intermittent
generation
Price volatility incentive for sustainable
sources
Natural Gas is key fuel for chp systems
Electricity decouples from GDP
Developing economies
Electricity demand correlated with
GDP growth
Growth of manufacturing
Developed economies
Loss of energy intensive industries
Power quality and the digital economy
Climate change:
EU three times 20 by 2020
20% energy consumption cut
20% greenhouse gases cut
20% share by renewables
Renewable electricity:
~ 25% gross power generation in 2018, with non-hydro accounting for 8%.
surpass output from natural gas and double generation from nuclear by 2016,
becoming the second-most important source of electricity behind coal.
Source: IEE 2013
Sustainable Energy Systems
Sustainable Energy Source
An energy source that:
Is not substantially depleted by continued use
Does not entail significant pollution emissions or other
environmental concerns
Does not involve the perpetuation of substantial health hazards
or social injustices
Source: Boyle 2004
Dream on, but we will do our best
Micropower
Relatively small, modular, mass-producible, quick-to-deploy (hence rapidly
scalable) sources of electricity . (Vijay Vaitheeswaran, The Economist, 2000)
Combines two kinds of micropower:
renewables other than big hydroelectric dams,
cogeneration of electricity and useful heat (combined-heat-and-power, CHP).
Releases little or no carbon.
Enables individuals, communities, building owners, and factory operators to
generate electricity, displacing dependence on centralized generators.
Democratises energy choices, promotes competition, speeds learning and
innovation, and can further accelerate deployment
Since 2000 generation from low and no-carbon, rapidly scalable renewables
(excluding large hydro) and co-generation has grown by nearly 150% and
generates ~24% of global power
Source: Rocky Mountain Institute 2014
Global Low or No-carbon Installed Electricity
Generation Capacity
Source: Rocky Mountain Institute Micropower database July 2014
Global Low or No-carbon Electricity
Generation
Renewable energy flows
Path
Direct heating
Direct radiation
SUN
120,000 TW
Absorbed by Earth
Water evaporation
Heating of atmosphere
Photosynthesis
Gravitational force 3 TW
Earths core
10 TW
Renewable Energy Technology
Thermal electric
Photovoltaics
Hydropower
Wind/wave converters
Biofuels
Tidal schemes
Geothermal schemes
Source: Freris & Infield 2008
Conversion of energy forms to
electricity
Nuclear
Thermal
Chemical
coal, gas, oil
biomass, waste
hydrogen
Gravitational
Hydro/tidal
Wind &
wave
Mechanical
Electrical
Solar
Conversion of energy forms to
electricity
Gravitational
Hydro/tidal
Nuclear
Wind &
wave
Fusion
(Fission)
Thermal
Thermal
Rankine/
Brayton
= 90+%
Chemical
coal, gas, oil
biomass, waste
hydrogen
Heat engines
< 60%
Mechanical
Electrical
generator
= 90+%
Electrical
PV
Solar thermal
Solar
Fuel cells
Note: this diagram can be made more complicated!
Freris & Infield
Renewable & Sustainable energy sources
MSW (municipal solid waste)
incineration
pyrolysis/gasification
Hydro
large
small
run-of-river
high level dam
Biofuels
energy crops
forestry waste
agricultural waste
sewerage and other organic
CHP (combined heat & power)
Power led
Heat led
Wind
onshore
offshore
Wave
shoreline
near shore
offshore
Tidal
stream
barrage
Solar
PV
thermal
Geothermal
(Source: Tyndall Centre 2003 Renewable Energy in UK + additions)
Sustainable Energy Systems
Sustainable Energy Systems impact on:
Environment
Politics
Includes Climate
Change
Economics
Energy Systems
Energy System all processes from the reception of raw inputs to delivery of benefit
Raw Fuel input
Conversion
electricity
heat/coolth
mechanical
Transport
long-distance
local
storage
Usage
Benefit
There are options within the energy supply chain according to application
Energy Systems Electricity
supply
33kV
22k
V
400k
V
132k
V
Large industrial
Small industrial
11kV
Power station
Power station
transformer
Step-down
transformer
Step-down
transformer
240V
*
Domestic &
commercial
Step-down
transformer
* 415V 3 phase
Transmission
system
Sub-transmission
system
Distribution
system
[History of UK power system see Addendum]
Source: Boyle 2004
Energy Systems system losses
Quoted in Energy Efficiency, Taxonomy Overview, Lovins 2004
Energy Chain - Conventional electricity supply
Fuel input
Power
generation
HV
transmission
(+ storage)
Security of supply
Flexible
Minimises spare capacity
MV/LV
distribution
(+ storage)
BUT
Energy
retailer/
marketing
Capital intensive
Energy losses
(Climate change)
End-user
Energy Chain Direct Drive system
Fuel input
Conversion/
Power
generation
Examples:
Gas pipeline compressors
Static construction plant
Oil production
CSP tower producing 50 tons
of steam per day for enhanced
oil recovery in Oman.
(GlassPoint Solar)
Application
End-user
Issues:
Dedicated
Modular
Capital saving on cabling
Efficiencies can be poor
Energy Chain Device Drive system for
isolated sites
Small PV/
small wind
Storage
Application
End-user
Note: also applicable to solar heating systems
Examples:
Telecommunication, signalling, etc
Remote buildings
Issues:
Capital saving on cabling
Low cost storage (e.g. automotive batteries)
Flexible, mobile
Low power LV applications generally
Energy Chain Island Generation system
Fuel input
Power
generation
Private
MV/LV
distribution
Examples:
High security supply
Remote communities; no Grid
supply
(Micro-grids)
bloody mindedness
End-user
Note: no external connection
Issues:
Capital saving on Grid
connection
Operation savings on use of
system
Back-up capacity
Potential for CHP
Energy Chain Combined Heat & Power
(CHP) systems
Fuel input
MV/LV
distribution
End-user
Heat/coolth
generation
Heat/coolth
storage
Power
generation
Examples:
Process heat industries
Community/district heating
Large HEVAC
Heat/coolth
distribution &
conversion
End-user
Issues:
Potential for improved efficiency
Operation savings on use of system
Heat/load balance
Interconnection
But what about wind and wave based systems?
Energy Chain Large variable/intermittent
system
HV
transmission
MV/LV
distribution
Power
generation
Energy
retailer/
marketing
End-user
Reserve capacity/storage/load
management
Examples:
Onshore/offshore wind
Large solar
Issues:
Variability/intermittency
Interconnection
Dispatchability
AC/DC
Energy Chain Distributed generation
.
.
.
Energy
sources.
.
.
.
Small
Gen.
HV
transmission
MV/LV
distribution
Microgrid
Energy
retailer/
marketing
End-user
Examples:
Small generators
Non-schedulable generation
Issues:
Variability/intermittency
Interconnection
Dispatchability
Distributed generation - definitions
Distributed Generation (DG) any dispersed generation less than 100 MW.
Distributed Energy Resources (DERs)
small-scale power generation technology that supplies less than 10 MW
located throughout the distribution network; frequently renewable energy
and energy storage.
Demand Response (DR) management of consumption, anywhere along a
feeder, in response to supply conditions
Microgrid
local network of DERs that is a subset of the distribution network
can operate in an isolated manner or be connected.
Microgrid management targets local energy supply and demand .
Energy Chain Distributed generation
Grid-control
Energy Mgt.
System
Energy Exchange
Billing
Biomass
CHP
Power &
communicatio
n network
Manageable loads
Meter reading
Distributed loads
Solar
Distributed microchp
Wind turbines
Communication only
Communication + power
Source: RWE Deutschland
The new systems nature of the power sector
Power is going from a linear supply-demand model towards a model where:
Power consumers become producers (prosumers),
One-way electricity and information flows become bi-directional,
Decentralisation challenges and complements the old centralised architecture,
Closer real-time management becomes feasible as well as necessary to
handle more variable generation
EURELECTRIC, May 2013
Disruptive challenges
Recent technological and economic changes are expected to challenge and
transform the [US] electric utility industry. These disruptive challenges arise
due to a convergence of factors, including:
Falling costs of distributed generation and other distributed energy resources
(DER);
Enhanced focus on development of new DER technologies;
Increasing customer, regulatory, and political interest in demand-side
management technologies (DSM);
Government programs to incentivize selected technologies;
Declining price of natural gas;
Slowing economic growth trends;
Rising electricity prices in certain areas of the country.
Disruptive Challenges: Financial Implications and Strategic Responses to a Changing Retail Electric Business Edison
Electric Institute; January 2013
Financial risks to Utilities from Disruptive
Challenges
The financial risks created by disruptive challenges include:
declining utility revenues, increasing costs, and lower long-term profitability
Increased DER and DSM market share, reduced utility revenues
Higher DER integration costs + increased subsidies for DSM and direct
metering of DER profitability squeeze
Regulators may allow recovery of lost revenues in future tariff cases, but nonDER customers will have to pay for (or absorb) lost revenues.
Increased DER penetration political pressure to undo cross subsidies
utility stranded cost exposure.
Disruptive Challenges: Financial Implications and Strategic Responses to a Changing Retail Electric
Business Edison Electric Institute; January 2013
Vicious Cycle from Disruptive
challenges
Technology Innovation
(DER)
Energy Efficiency
(EE, DSM)
Lost Revenue
DER
Tariff increase
Behavioural
change
Customer reaction
Disruptive Challenges: Financial Implications and Strategic Responses to a Changing Retail Electric Business Edison
Electric Institute; January 2013
Grid Defection
Entrepreurial attack
Declining technology costs
Alternative business models
Demand for alternative supplies (greenness, resilience, etc)
Re-allocation
effects encourages
external competition
Traditional Model under siege
Must deliver supply which is
Reliable
Cost-effective
Environmentally responsible
Meet shareholders financial demands
Defection spreads
fixed costs over
fewer consumers
Upward price pressures
Grid and resilience upgrades
Environmental controls, retirements
Smart Grid investment
Energy efficiency successes
Economics of Grid Defection; CohnReznick et al; Feb 2014
E.ON the shape of things to come . . ?
E.ON proposes to split into two separate companies in 2015:
A new (as-yet-unnamed) company:
the coal, gas and nuclear assets, plus its trading business and
hydropower plants.
E.ON:
renewable energy,
energy efficiency,
digitizing the distribution network
customer-sited energy sources like storage paired with solar.
Distributed Generation Technical Issues
Proliferation of distributed energy without proper grid integration negative,
consequences for the price, quality and reliability of power.
Most DERs not connected to supervisory control and data acquisition
(SCADA) systems.
Difficult to monitor and control their security and efficiency.
Renewables impact grid with transient voltage variations and harmonic
distortions
Clustered DERs can function as a single virtual power plant (VPP) with
centralized voltage control, storage, demand response, and distribution
automation. RWE began a pilot VPP in 2012 with ~80 MW capacity
DERs can complement utility plant rather than competing.
Utilities have potential to postpone generation investments and improve grid
stability.
Energy Outputs
Energy System
Conversion
electricity
heat/coolth
mechanical
High Voltage Direct Current
Transport
long-distance
local
storage
Usage
Alternating Current vs. Direct Current
Benefit
Alternating Current
Historically the most important
Ease of changing voltages through transformers
AC voltages chosen for each stage from generation to consumer
Transmission power loss = I2R [I = current and R = resistance]
Increased Voltage decreased Current lower power losses
BUT Increased voltage increased radiation losses
Reactive elements (inductance and capacitance) limit transmission capacity
and distance;
may require additional compensating equipment on the line
Linking AC systems can system instability, increasing short-circuit levels
and undesirable power-flows.
Direct Current
Historically difficult to change voltages without heavy losses
Limited number of DC networks
BUT
Solar PV produces DC (also fuel cells)
Other renewables capable of DC
Most storage technology is DC
Most IT and digital technology is (low voltage) DC
AC high energy (heat) loss
AC spikes, etc.
Take a data centre as an example. [More in Addendum]
Direct Current Example: data centre
If mains AC to data centre DC and then distributed DC power:
less power loss in multiple conversions (AC to DC; DC to AC)
reduced energy consumption; > 5-10% of energy saved (more if
DC feed from solar)
less space required by the DC infrastructure (less equipment; direct
connection by IT equipment to backup batteries)
decrease in cooling requirements
Lawrence Berkley Labs (LBL) study (quoted Sinopoli 2012) indicated:
7% reduction of energy consumption
28% efficiency gain,
more reliable, and potentially cost less in the long run.
Facebook and SAP have piloted DC power in their data centers.
[Note DCC+G consortium, led by Siemens, studying an optimized 380-volt
DC network in an office building and a superstore. Reporting 2015]
High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) 1
Issues with high voltage, long distance AC transmission:
Reactive elements (inductance and capacitance) limit transmission capacity
and distance;
may require additional compensating equipment on the line
Linking AC systems can system instability, increasing short-circuit levels
and undesirable power-flows.
High Voltage DC
Commercial HVDC started in the 1950s based on mercury arc valves ,
(20-MW Gotland submarine-land project)
Introduction of silicon-controlled rectifiers (thyristors) in the 1960s
High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) applications
Key applications:
Developing countries with fast growth in electric energy demand (e.g. China,
India and Brazil)
long overhead transmission lines from hydro and fossil energy sources
expanding their systems with ultra-high-voltage (UHV) grids including
HVDC. Projects 800 kV, 6,000-MW and higher under construction
European utilities connecting hydro, wind, storage and other sources of energy
Wayleave difficulties underground and underwater transmission.
Mainly HVDC; 64 - 80 km claimed break-even point [?]
Sources:
http://tdworld.com/overhead_transmission/power_war_currents_update/#ixzz24MhjS16R
http://tdworld.com/overhead_transmission/hvdc-transmission-evolution-040112/#ixzz24Mnbzj7p
High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC)
For 6,000-MW transmission:
7x 500-kV AC power lines = 2x 600-kV DC lines = one 800-kV DC line
Ideal for underwater cables Iceland geothermal?
HVDC power transfers controllable and precisely measured
directing exactly where the power is injected into the AC grid
no transmission congestion.
Note: DESERTEC and others!
Sources:
http://tdworld.com/overhead_transmission/power_war_currents_update/#ixzz2
4MhjS16R
http://tdworld.com/overhead_transmission/hvdc-transmission-evolution040112/#ixzz24Mnbzj7p
Addendum
Development of UK transmission and distribution system
Power usage in Data Centres and Servers
1880 - 1920: Electrification begins
Electricity Demand and
Generation Capacity
Load factor still
160
only 10%
300
120
100
150
80
First electrified
tramway
commissioned
40
50
0
1890
Worlds first 3
turbo-alternator
commissioned
(150kW, 40Hz)
20
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
0
1900
Year
Generation Capacity
Electricity Demand
Electricity Dem and and Generation Capacit y
3.5
2.5
Voltage raised to
20kV
2
1.5
1
3
2.5
2
3transmissio
n system
6.6kV, 40Hz
1.5
1
0.5
0
1900
0.5
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
Year
Generation Capacity
Electricity Demand
1918
0
1920
Elec Demand (TWh)
100
60
Elec Demand (GWh)
200
140
Typical UK power
station:
8 x100 kW
Gen Capacity (GW)
Gen Capacity (MW)
250
Ele ctricity De m and and Ge ne ration Capacity
16
14
CEB despatch 140
power stations
(public/private)
12
10
8
6
4
2
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Central Electricity
Board (CEB)
created
0
1920
CEB complete
most of 132kV, 50
Hz grid
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
Generation Capacity Ye ar Electricity Demand
1948
E le c D e m a n d ( T W h )
G e n C a p a c ity (G W )
1920-1947: High Voltage
Transmission era
1947-1990: Nationalised
Industry era
Demand and
Generation
Grow th in Electricity Demand and Generation Capacity
80
70
300
200
150
100
50
60
Privatisation
250
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
Electicity Demand
Generation Capacity
Year
Maximum
Demand
1950: Need to build 275kV grid
recognised
1951: Capacity shortage
persists (17% load-shed)
1955: Nuclear power
programme announced
Max Demand/Gen Capacity
(GW)
1948: British Electricity
Association created:
- 14 area boards
- 14 generating divisions
350
Elec Demand (TWh)
1947
Nationalisation of 200
electricity companies and 370
municipality supply
obligations
Capacity shortages lead to
disconnection at peak load
Government intervention to
limit choice of turboalternators to 30MW or 60MW
1947-1990: Nationalised
Industry era
Demand and
Generation
Grow th in Electricity Demand and Generation Capacity
80
70
60
250
200
150
100
Privatisatio
n
50
Privatisation
1955: South of Scotland
Electricity Board created
Elec Demand (TWh)
300
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
Electicity Demand
Generation Capacity
Year
Maximum Demand
1958: CEGB created with
responsibility for:
-Generation (262 power stations,
24 GW)
- Transmission (15,000 km Over
Head Lines)
- Wholesale reselling
1958: 12 area boards
created with responsibility
for:
-Distribution
-Retailing
Max Demand/Gen Capacity
(GW)
350
AC-DC conversions within data centers
Numerous AC-DC conversions within data centers, each resulting in energy losses
Electricity Use In A Server (Watts)
Based on a typical dual processor 450W 2U Server;
Approximately 160W out of 450W (35%) are losses in the power conversion process.
Source: Brian Griffith: INTEL