TRANSACTIONAL
LEADERSHIP
Give something to get something
Prepared by: MBL
ASSUMPTIONS
People’s motivation
reward and punishment.
Social systems
work best with a clear chain of command
agreed to do a job
cede all authority to their manager
prime purpose
subordinate do what their manager tells them to do
STYLE
CREATE CLEAR STRUCTURES
subordinates, rewards, Punishments
EARLY STAGE
negotiating the contract
WORK ALLOCATION
fully responsible
MANAGEMENT BY EXCEPTION PRINCIPLE
defined performance
Four Dimensions
Contingent Reward Behavior
Passive Management by Exception
Active Management by Exception
Laissez-Faire
• Contingent Rewards:
- link the goal to rewards,
- clarify expectations,
- provide necessary resources,
- set mutually agreed upon goals,
- and provide various kinds of rewards for successful
performance.
• Active Management by Exception:
- actively monitor the work of their subordinates,
- watch for deviations from rules and standards
- and taking corrective action to prevent mistakes.
• Passive Management by Exception:
- intervene only when standards are not met or when
the performance is not as per the expectations.
- may even use punishment as a response to
unacceptable performance.
• Laissez-faire:
- provides an environment where the subordinates get
many opportunities to make decisions.
- The leader himself abdicates responsibilities and
avoids making decisions and therefore the group
often lacks direction.
Benefits of Transactional Leadership style
• Simple and Low Cost (no extensive training just
rewards or punishment
• Clear and Easy to Follow (leaves little room for
misinterpretation or ambiguity)
• Powerful Motivator (Money and other tangible
rewards are a proven and reliable motivator)
• Gets Results Fast (works well when short-term
results are needed fast.)
Limitations
• Motivation (assumes a very simplistic view of
motivation, which fails to account for individual
differences)
• Rigidity (A transactional leader is rigid in his
expectations about the working relationship, and
believes the role of subordinates is to do as they are
told )
• Blame (It's never the fault of a transactional
leader when tasks go wrong)
• Reliance on the Leader (Transactional leaders
must always be present to guarantee that the
work will get done properly