MGT Concepts and Practices Assignment: Department of Management (Mba)
MGT Concepts and Practices Assignment: Department of Management (Mba)
• A balanced scorecard is
• a performance metric used to identify, improve, and
control a business's various functions and resulting
outcomes.
• It was first introduced in 1992 by David Norton and
Robert Kaplan, who took previous metric performance
measures and adapted them to include nonfinancial
information.
• The balanced scorecard involves measuring four main
aspects of a business: learning and growth, business
processes, customers, and finance.
cond
• What was new about balanced scorecard was that
• it provided a simple, pedagogic structure for assessing such
values.
• When Robert Kaplan and David Norton launched the concept
of the balanced scorecard in the Harvard Business Reviewin
1994 and later in a book under the title of their concept, they
postulated the idea of organizational control on a basis of four
perspectives/ components /:
– finance,
– learning and growth,
– customers and
– internalbusiness processes.
cond
The balance in balanced scorecard is first and foremost the
balance between financial and non-financial values
• For a more comprehensive appreciation of the different
perspectives of organizational control, we can divide them into
. internal, external and profit perspectives.
Minor perspectives commonly grouped under these three
categories
INTERNAL PERSPECTIVE
• Processes
• Efficiency
• Employee
• Innovation/ renewal/learning
• Organization
• Products
• Environment/quality
cond
EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE
• Customer
• Relations/stakeholders
• External business environment
• Suppliers
• Community
PERFORMANCE PERSPECTIVE
• Finance
• Economy
• Owners
• Profitability
cond
• However, the balance in balanced scorecard is of a more
traditional character in that
it pits leading metrics against lagging metrics.
– Leading metrics are measures that refer to earlier parts of
a process and give early indications of the direction a
company is taking,
– while lagging metrics measure the results.
– If we assume that happy employees make for more
satisfied customers, and that this in the long-term will
result in better profitability,
– then co-worker satisfaction is a leading metric while
profitability is a lagging metric.
cond
• . Internal benchmarking
• Benefits
• most cost efficient
• relatively easy
• low cost
• fast
• good practice/training with benchmarking process
• information sharing
• easy to transfer lessons learned
• common language
• gain a deeper understanding of your own process
• makes a great starting point for future benchmarking studies
cond
• Challenges
• fosters mediocrity
• limits options for growth
• low performance improvement
• can create atmosphere of competitiveness
• not much of a stretch
• internal bias
• may not yield best-in-class comparisons
cond
• Competitive benchmarking
• Benefits
• comparing like processes
• know your competition better
• possible partnership
• useful for planning and setting goals
• similar regulatory issues
• Challenges
• difficult legal issues
• relatively low performance improvement
• threatening
• limited by trade secrets
• may provide misleading information
• may not get best-in-class comparisons
• competitors could capitalize on your weaknesses
cond
• Functional benchmarking
• Benefits
• provides industry trend information
• quantitative comparisons
• better improvement rate; about 35
• Challenges
• diverse corporate cultures
• great need for specificity
• not invented here. syndrome
• common functions can be difficult to find
• takes more time than internal or percent
• must be able to visualize how to adapt the best practices
cond
• Generic benchmarking
• Benefits
• high payoff; about 35 percent
• noncompetitive/nonthreatening
• broad,new perspective
• innovative
• high potential for discovery
• examines multiple industries
• can compare to world
cond
• Challenges
• difficult concept
• can be difficult to identify best-in- class
• takes a long time to plan
• known world-class companies are inundated
with requests
• quantum changes can bring high risk, escalate
fear
• class organizations in your process
cond
• The use and misuse of benchmarking may be
illustrated at four different levels:
1. De-standardized key ratio sresult in the
comparison of metrics that do not reflect
the same work content, so that what we get
is
• not a comparison between apples and apples
but rather between apples and whole baskets
of fruit. Comparisons of this kind are far too
common, particularly in the public sector.
cond
2. Standardized key ratios. Obviously, it is much better to
have carried out a standardization process, i.e. to end
up with comparable figures.
– This variation of benchmarking is extremely useful for
diagnostics – identifying which areas should be
chosen for careful examination.
3. Genuine benchmarking is just as much about
standardized key ratios as documented procedures with
comparable work content or causality. By this we mean
not only that somebody performs better, but also
whyand how..
cond
• 4. Benchlearning is a methodology developed by Karlöf
Consulting that can help organizations further on their
way towards progress through participation and the
learning process.
• In its most developed form, benchmarking is not merely
about making comparisons with role models. It is also about
learning from mistakes.
cond
• uses of benchmarking:
• 1. Calibration of one’s efficiency against others
2. Source of inspiration to improve procedures
3. Source of expertise in any given situation,
e.g. strategy development
• 4. Diagnostic search tool to improve areas of
the whole organization
cond
Principles of BPR
1.Organize around outcomes, not tasks
2.Identify all the organization's processes and
prioritize them in order of redesign urgency
3.Integrate information processing work into the
real work that produces the information
4.Treat geographically dispersed resources as
though they were centralized
5.Link Parallel activities in the workflow instead
of just integrating their results
cond
6.Put the decision point where the work is
performed, and build control into the process
7.Capture information once and at the source
Advantages of BPR
• BPR revolves around customer needs and helps
to give an appropriate focus to the business.
• BPR provides cost advantages that assist the
organisation's competitive position. ...
• BPR can help to reduce organisational
complexity by eliminating unnecessary activities.
cond
• Principle C: Integrity
• The integrity principle of the APA general principles aims to
encourage psychologists to engage in honest, transparent
practices within all aspects of the field of p
• Principle D: Justice
• The justice principle of the APA general principles states that
people are entitled to the advances made within the field of
psychology and to the services offered by professionals within
the fieldsychology.
• Principle E: Respect for people's rights and dignity
• The APA general principle concerning respect for people's rights
and dignity recognizes individuals' rights to privacy and
confidentiality.
Theory of R managment