Lecture Five
THE NATURE OF MEANING
INTRODUCTION
Wehave observed that semantics is the linguistic study of
meaning.
Wehave also noted that meaning is central to the process of
communication.
Meaning is at the centre of the study of semantics.
However, there are differences in opinion based on
approaches and methods.
We shall explore meaning from the perspectives of the
different schools of thought.
SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN MEANING
Both linguists and philosophers agree that meaning is
central to semantics.
However, there is considerable disparity among different
scholars on the exact conception of meaning.
There are different schools of thought in relation to
meaning.
These are the naturalists, the conventionalists and the
contextualists.
SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN MEANING
The Naturalists:
The chief proponent of the naturalists is Plato.
According to them, the meaning of a word is the entity or
thing it represents.
There is an intrinsic relationship between sound and meaning.
Themajor criticism of this view is that there exist very many
words in natural languages without physical entities.
SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN MEANING
The Conventionalists:
The chief proponent of the conventionalists is Aristotle.
Tothem, words and their meaning do not necessarily have
any direct link.
Whatever connection existing between a word and meaning is
through a concept formed in the minds of the users of the
language.
The Contextualists:
According to the contextualists, the meaning of a word
derives from its usage.
TYPES OF MEANING
There are three basic types of meaning.
These are thematic, conceptual and associative.
Associative meanings can further be divided into:
Connotative,
Collocative,
Affective,
Reflected and
stylistic.
THEMATIC MEANING
Thematic meaning derives from the organisation of the
message presented in a language.
Itis the arrangement of the components of communication
that determine the point of emphasis.
This arrangement may take the form of passivization,
topicalization or focus.
Inthe sentences that follow, different items have been made
more prominent by merely re-ordering them.
THEMATIC MEANING
1. Jane bought the house – Normal SVO order
2. It was Jane that bought the house – Topicalized
3. The house was bought by Jane – Passivized.
4. The house, Jane painted – Focused
In sentence (1), the sentence is in the normal subject verb
object order without any special meaning.
Sentences (2) and (4) tend to lay emphasis on Jane, the
doer of the action being referred to.
In sentence (3), emphasis is on the house, which was
bought.
THEMATIC MEANING
Focused and topicalized elements in a structure are given
prominence within an information structure.
A component of the bit of information can also be made
more prominent by stressing it.
Consider the following:
1. She BOUGHT my newspaper (She did not STEAL
it)
2. She bought my NEWSPAPER (not my textbook)
3. SHE bought my newspaper (not any other person)
CONCEPTUAL MEANING
Conceptual meaning is synonymous with primary, central,
logical, cognitive or denotative meaning of a word.
It is the first ordinary meaning listed in dictionaries, which
is not affected by the context, or emotional overtones
associated with the act of communication.
There is an assumed shared conceptual meaning of every
word of a language.
There is a universal implication of the conceptual meaning.
It is possible to express the conceptual meaning of a word
using contrastive semantic features.
CONCEPTUAL MEANING
Such features indicate the attributes present and those that
are absent.
If a feature is present, it is specified as (+);
If absent, it is (-).
These contrastive features specifying the attributes of the
words provide the necessary criteria for the correct use of
words.
CONCEPTUAL MEANING
The feature specifications for the words man and woman
are as follows:
The conceptual meaning of a word constitutes a major part
of the shared system of a language for all speakers.
It is a criteria element of human communication.
It is a major process in structural semantics.
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
The meaning of a word is affected by the context,
background, time and the cultural realities of the users of
language.
This type of meaning is not static.
It is variable and open ended.
Certain words, structures and styles are usually employed
to arouse some emotional reactions in the hearer.
These different reactions are derived from the
Words create associations in the minds of language users.
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
It is not always easy to express that form of meaning in
terms of contrastive semantic features.
Associative meaning reflects individual differences.
There are individualized intentions and interpretations.
There is, therefore, the need for all participants in
communication to share common reference points,
symbols and background for there to be any meaningful
interaction.
Most of the problems of communication arise when
associative meaning is assumed to be shared by all
concerned.
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
There must be a way of ensuring actual sharing of
background.
For second language learners, this problem is profound.
This explains the enormous difficulty second language
learners’ encounter with decoding the meaning of idioms
and figurative expressions.
They also find it difficult to apply appropriate idioms to
diverse situations.
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
Associative meaning can be any of the following.
Connotative Meaning
Collocative Meaning
Reflected Meaning
Stylistic or Social Meaning
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
Collocative Meaning:
Collocation is the natural association and sequence of words
in longer structures.
Collocative meaning is therefore the meaning of a lexical
item deriving from other lexical items with which it is
associated in a longer structure.
The collocative meaning of lexical items in a language is
based on related semantic fields.
For instance, job, employment, engagement, and work are
all related.
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
Collocative Meaning:
There are also associations that are perceived to be more
natural.
Consider the following examples:
August visitor
Auspicious occasion
Sympathize with
Nutritious food
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
Affective Meaning:
It is related to the feelings and attitudes of the speaker
towards the subject or the audience.
This meaning is achieved by the choice of words.
Certain words suggest positive feelings – love, attraction,
happiness, exciting etc.
Some others stir up negative reactions – disgusting,
nauseating, disappointing, etc.
Interjections like ah!, oh!, uh!, mmn!, often suggest the
emotional state of the mind.
Other words like darling, daddy, mummy, and so on, give
an impression of endearment.
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
Reflected Meaning:
It relates to expressions with multiple meanings.
Words with several meanings (polysemous words), have
reflected meaning.
There is, however, a dominant meaning among these several
meanings.
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
Stylistic Meaning:
When a particular pattern of speech, language variety or
speech form is associated with a specific social context,
stylistic or social meaning is achieved.
It is common knowledge that a speaker’s choice of words
and structures reveals his or her social, regional,
geographical or even economic background.
The choices can also reveal the level of familiarity between
the speaker and the hearer.
Emphasis is usually on the different stylistic variations open
to language users.
ASSOCIATIVE MEANING
Stylistic Meaning:
Based on the level of familiarity, users have the following
possibilities in making requests.
1. I wonder if I could see you later today (indirect
question) used for extreme politeness
2. May I see you later today (very formal)
3. Can I see you later today (causal and less formal)