Setting Life's Goal: Group 7 (Ab Political Science 1C)
The document discusses theories of goal setting, self-efficacy, and mindset. It describes Bandura's research on self-efficacy and how beliefs about one's capabilities influence behavior. It outlines Carol Dweck's theory of fixed and growth mindset and how perceptions of success and failure differ. It also summarizes Edwin Locke's goal setting theory and 14 key findings from research on how specific, difficult goals can improve performance when coupled with commitment and feedback.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views26 pages
Setting Life's Goal: Group 7 (Ab Political Science 1C)
The document discusses theories of goal setting, self-efficacy, and mindset. It describes Bandura's research on self-efficacy and how beliefs about one's capabilities influence behavior. It outlines Carol Dweck's theory of fixed and growth mindset and how perceptions of success and failure differ. It also summarizes Edwin Locke's goal setting theory and 14 key findings from research on how specific, difficult goals can improve performance when coupled with commitment and feedback.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26
Setting Life’s Goal
GROUP 7 (AB POLITICAL SCIENCE 1C)
Setting Life’s Goals Topics to be Discussed:
Bandura’s Self Efficacy
Dweck’s Mindset (Growth and Fixed) Locke’s Goal Setting theory Albert E. Bandura
Born in Mundare Alberta on December 4, 1925, he was the
youngest of 6 children. He had his undergraduate degree in University of British Columbia. While he earned his masters degree in University of Iowa in 1951 as well his doctorate in 1952. He received a lot of awards, the most prestigious being the National Medal of Science, Awarded to him by President Barack Obama in 2015 The BOBO DOLL EXPERIMENT Dr. Bandura devised on experiment in the 1950’s that proved how influential social model to the development of children. Two groups of children were chosen. One was showed with a violent social model and the other with a non-violent social model. Then They’re allowed to interact with inflatable BOBO dolls The result showed that those who are shown with violent model, acts with aggression towards the doll and the those who shown non-violent models acted opposite. These laid the foundation for Bandura’s Social cognitive theory, which states that we are actors in our environment. We are active participants, and not just motionless clay dolls, who are shaped by the world we live in Dr. Bandura’s Self Efficacy Theory Welbell(2011) summarized Albert Bandura’s self efficacy theory. “Self-efficacy theory is based on the assumption that psychological procedures serve as a means of creating and strengthening expectations of personal efficacy” Self-efficacy theory makes a distinction between expectations of efficacy and response-outcome expectancies Outcome expectancy is a person’s estimate that a given behavior will lead to certain outcomes Efficacy expectation is the conviction that one can successfully execute the behavior required to produced outcomes. What is the difference of the two terms?
Outcome expectancy is focused on what will be the result of a course of
actions, but not whether one can successfully perform the action. While the Efficacy expectation is the opposite, as one disregards doubts and take a course of actions. Furthermore Welbell (2011) said that Dr. Bandura’s definition of self- efficacy is the belief of the people to produce designated levels of performances that has influence over events in their lives. The acts of these people includes:
1. Approach difficult tasks as challenges to be mastered
2. Set challenging goals and maintaining a strong commitment 3. Heighten or sustain effects in the face of failures and set backs. 4. Attribute failure to lack of effort, knowledge, and skill. 5. Approach threat as something they can control Those who doubt themselves exercise the following 1. Shying away from tasks they view as threat 2. Low aspirations and low commitment to goals 3. Dwells on self deficiencies and obstacles instead of focusing on how to improve 4. Giving up quickly 5. Slow to recover from setbacks 6. Easy victim to stress and depression Four main sources of influences by which a Person’s Self Efficacy is developed and maintained
1. Accomplishments and mastery experiences
2. Vicarious experiences 3. Verbal and Social persuasion 4. Physiological (somatic and emotional) states Bandura’s Quotes on Self-efficacy (Kendra 2017) “Self-efficacy is the belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the sources of action required to manage prospective situations From ocial Foundations of Thought and Actions: A Social Cognitive Theory, 1986. “If efficacy beliefs always reflected only what people can do routinely, they would rarely fail but they would not set aspirations beyond their immediate reach nor mount the extra effort needed to surpass their ordinary performances” From Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 1994. “Self-belief does not necessarily ensure success, but self-disbelief assuredly spawns failure.” From Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control,1997. “By sticking it out through tough times, people emerge from adversity with a stronger sense of efficacy.” From Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 1994 “People’s belief about their abilities have a profound effect on those abilities. Ability is not a fixed property; there is a huge variability in how you perform. People who have a sense of self-efficacy bounce back from failure; they approach things in terms of how to handle them rather than worrying about what can go wrong.” From Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, 1996 FIXED AND GROWTH MINDSET THEORY BY CAROL DWECK
Who is Carol Dweck?
Carol S. Dweck is the author of “Mindset: The New Psychology of Success”
Born on October 17, 1946. Graduated from Bernard College in 1967 and earned her PhD in Yale University in 1972. She taught in Columbia University of Illinois, Harvard University and lastly Stanford University where she taught (Upclosed 2017) She is one of the most awarded psychologist today, with her works published in publication like “The New Yorker,” “Time,” “The New York times,” “The Washington Post,” and “The Boston” (Mindset 2006-2010) Fixed and Growth Mindset Dr. Dweck’s Theory of fixed and growth mindset states that there are two types mindset, based on how people perceived success. Fixed and Growth Growth mindset believes that success is earned through hard work. People with this mindset, believes that success is based on people’s hard work, perseverance and have a growth theory of evidence. People who have Fixed mindset believes that success is earned through one’s innate abilities. That success is based on one's capabilities and intelligence One may not be aware with what mindset he or he has. But it could be determined through their reaction to failure. Those who have Fixed Mindset has a clear fear of failure, because they attribute it to their own lacking. Those who has Growth Mindset see failure as an opportunity to grow and learn, thus they lack fear from it.
Fixed and growth mindset could be developed through environment. It
is mostly based on the compliments a person’s circle of companions give. Those who receives compliments such as, “You’re smart,” Good job” were likely to develop a Fixed mindset. Those who receives compliments like, “Good job, you must have worked so hard” you may develop Growth Mindset Dr. Dweck believes that the key to live a life without stress. In an interview she said: “In a fixed mindset, students believe their basic abilities, their intelligence, their talents are just fixed traits. They have a certain amount and that’s that, and their goal becomes to look smart all the time and never to look dumb. In the growth mindset, students understand their talents and abilities can be developed, through effort, good teaching and persistence. They don’t necessarily think everyone’s the same or anyone can be Einstein, but they believe everyone can get smarter if they work for it.” (Upclosed 2017) https://www.techtello.com/fixed-mindset-vs-growth-mindset/ GOAL SETTING THEORY BY EDWIN A. LOCKE
Who is Edwin A. Locke?
He is on internationally known Psychologist and Researcher due to his research in Goal setting He was born on January 5, 1938. He is the Dean’s Professor (Emeritus) of Leadership and Motivation at the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland, College Park. He received his BA from Harvard in 1960 and his PhD in Industrial Psychology from Cornell University in 1964 (Locke 2017) GOAL SETTING THEORY Locke devoted almost his entire life in researching about his theory and more studies were conducted on this theory. He began the study in the middle of 1960’s and in 1966 he published an article titled Motivation Through Conscious Goal Setting The article was about his 30 years of research of the relationship between conscious performances goals and performances on work tasks. The content of Goal Setting Theory could be summarized into 14 Categories, or 14 Research Findings GOAL ATTRIBUTES Goal have internal and external attributes. Internally they are ideas (desired ends), externally they are referring to the object or condition sought (a job, a sale, a certain performance level) Qualitatively, the content of the goal is what the person is seeking. Quantitatively, two attributes of content, difficulty and specificity have been studied (Locke 2017) 14 RESEARCH FINDINGS
A research made my Locke (2017) under the article “Motivation
Through Conscious Goal Setting.” The research has the following findings. 1. The more difficult the goal, the greater the achievement. 2. The more specific or explicit the goal, the more precisely performance is regulated. 3. The goals that are both specific and difficult led to the highest performance 4. Commitment to goals is most critical when goals are specific and difficult 5. High commitment to goals is attained when: a. The individual is convinced that the goal is important b. The individual is convinced that the goal is attainable (or that, at least, progress can be made toward it.) Self efficacy refers to task-specific confidence that is a key component of Bandura’s (1986) Social Cognitive Theory 6. In addition to having effect on performance, self efficacy influences a. The difficulty level of the goal chosen or accepted b. Commitment to goals c. The response to negative feedback or failure d. The choice of the task strategies 7. Goal setting is most effective when there is feedback that shows progress in relation to goal 8. Goal Setting (along with self efficacy) mediates the effect of knowledge of past performance on subsequent performance. 9. Goals affect performance by affecting the direction of action, the degree of effort exerted, and the persistence of action over time. 10. Goal stimulate planning in general. The more difficult the goal, the more planning is utilized. Most of the time, the quality of plan is higher when the goal is specific 11. When people strive for goals on complex tasks, they are least effective in discovering suitable task strategies if: a. The have no prior training or experience on the task b. There is a high pressure to perform well c. There is a high time pressure (to perform well immediately) 12. Goals (including Goal Commitment) in combination with self efficacy, mediate or partially mediate the effects of several traits and incentives on performance. 13. Goal-setting and goal-related mechanism can be trained and/or adopted in the absence of training for the purpose of self-regulation. 14. Goal serve as standards of self-satisfaction with harder goals demanding higher accomplishments in order to attain self-satisfaction than easy goals. Goals increase anxiety if used to punish but enhance task interest if used for motivation. Group 7: Setting Life’s Goals
Members Ma. Cristina O. Talde James Kenneth M. Redoblado Carl Dave Sus Alexander Zahf Tanji