Partition of Bengal and Its Annulment (1905-1911) Background and Consequences
The document summarizes the British partition of Bengal in 1905 and its annulment in 1911. It discusses the reasons given by the British for partitioning Bengal, including its large size, communication issues, and language differences. It also examines the reactions of Hindus, Muslims and nationalists, and the protests and boycott movements that emerged in response. The partition polarized communities and contributed to the growth of the Indian independence movement. It was ultimately annulled in 1911 at the Delhi Durbar.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
414 views
Partition of Bengal and Its Annulment (1905-1911) Background and Consequences
The document summarizes the British partition of Bengal in 1905 and its annulment in 1911. It discusses the reasons given by the British for partitioning Bengal, including its large size, communication issues, and language differences. It also examines the reactions of Hindus, Muslims and nationalists, and the protests and boycott movements that emerged in response. The partition polarized communities and contributed to the growth of the Indian independence movement. It was ultimately annulled in 1911 at the Delhi Durbar.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17
HIS-103
Lec-2
Partition of Bengal and Its
Annulment (1905-1911)
Background and Consequences
Partition of Bengal (1905) Introduction • Since 1765 (following the Battle of Buxar), the province of Bengal, which included present-day West Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, Bangladesh and Assam was under the British. • Lord Curzon was the Viceroy of India from 1899 to 1905. • The partition of the Bengal province came into effect during his viceroyalty on 16th October 1905. • The partition of Bengal was the most important event during his rule. Causes of Partition According to the British, the causes of partition were as follows: • Vastness of Province • Limited Sources of Communication • Difference of Language • Need of the Time Vastness of Province •Bengal was a very large area and the population rose to almost 80 million by the first few years of the 20th century. •Calcutta was the capital of the province and also of British India. •There were difficulties in administering such a large area. •The eastern part, especially in rural areas were neglected. •That region was lacking in the fields of industry, education and employment. •Much of the industry was centred in Calcutta. •For administrative ease, the partition of the province had been proposed even before Curzon had arrived in India. Limited Sources of Communication • The sources of communication in the provinces were limited due to rivers and forests. • The law and order condition of the province was also worst due to insufficient police and inefficient management. • Therefore, the need of partition of province was felt severally Difference of Languages • There was also the difference of languages and civilization of the natives of West Bengal and East Bengal. • The natives of West Bengal considered themselves superior in civilization to the resident of East Bengal. • The condition demanded for the division of Provinces. Need of the Time • The division of Bengal was the need of the time to develop trade in East Bengal and to promote the Port of Chittagong • This could be done only by division of the Provinces. Causes of Partition • The ultimate motive remains questionable, as in two letters dated 7 February and 6 December 1904, Herbert Risley, Lord Curzon’s Home Secretary, wrote, “Bengal united is a force, Bengal divided will go in different ways. That the Partition Plan is opposed by the Congress is its merit for us. Our principal motive is to weaken a united party against the government.” Causes of Partition • He further wrote, “the partition was to split up and thereby weaken a solid body of opponents to our rule” • The “opponents” he referred to were, of course, the Indian nationalists, who at the time were most effectively mobilized in Bengal. • In fact, Indian nationalism had found its earliest expression in 19th century Bengal, and the British were very well aware of this. The Plan • According to the plan of Lord Curzon, after the partition, the two provinces would be Bengal (including modern West Bengal, Odisha and Bihar) and Eastern Bengal and Assam. • Eastern Bengal would consist of Hill Tripura, Chittagong, Rajshahi and Dhaka divisions. Its capital would be Dacca • West Bengal would have a Hindu majority and Eastern Bengal and Assam would have a Muslim majority population. Its capital would remain Calcutta Reaction of the Muslims • Favourable • Muslims led by the Nawab Sir Salimullah Khan of Dacca supported the partition • Emancipation of Muslims socially and economically • Free from Hindu dominance in economic field • Dacca - the centre of Muslim culture- Muslims had a great chance of success for social and cultural advancement than in Calcutta • Political upliftment and securing represent action in the Government • Relieving from competing with Hindus, who were more advanced in every field of life • Lord Curzon’s promise to start a university in Dacca Reaction of the Hindus • Not Favourable • End of their monopolies and exclusive hold on economic, social, political life of the whole of Bengal • Wanted status quo • Hindu lawyers also reacted to the partition of Bengal because they thought that the new province would have its separate courts and thus their practice would be affected • Hindus had their monopoly over almost whole of the province press General Reaction • The general protest in the rest of the country was against this partition ‘divide and rule’ policy of the British authorities • Creating a rift between the two communities and breaking the unity and nationalism in the country • Partition as an insult to their motherland. Rabindranath Tagore composed the famous song ‘Amar Sonar Bangla’ • Most of the Bengalis in the western part protested against this step which would also make them a linguistic minority in their own province • There would be more Odia and Hindi speaking people than Bengalis • A few Muslims also were against the partition Protest Movements • The Swadeshi and Boycott movements in the national struggle started • People started using home-made goods (deshi products) • They made public bonfires of foreign cloths, cigarettes, soap and anything that came handy. • The sale of British goods fell between 6 and 20 per cent of original levels. • This was the time when extreme nationalists came to the forefront. • A large number of young leaders in Bengal took up the task of educating people with Swadeshi spirit Annulment • When Lord Charles Hardinge assumed charge as Governor General of India (1910-1916), Hindus again became active and sent a representation to him for the annulment of partition of Bengal. • He recommended the same to the British Prime Minister for Indian Affairs. • On the occasion of the visiting King George V and holding of Darbar at Delhi on 12th December 1911, the partition of Bengal was cancelled and the two parts of Bengal was reunited. Aftermath • The united Bengal was placed under a Governor and Assam was placed under a Chief Commissioner. • This decision was shattering blow to Muslims. • It left them sullen and disillusioned. • Their anger and indignation had widespread repercussions. • The Muslims leaders and intelligentsia condemned the decision as betrayal of worst kind. • Created communal rift • Impacted on the larger nationalist movement across India • Created the idea of complete political freedom from British rule • Contributed to the birth of All India Muslim League in 1906.