0% found this document useful (0 votes)
164 views25 pages

Chapter 4 - Engineering As Social Experimentation

Engineers have a responsibility as experimenters to protect safety, obtain informed consent, and consider all impacts of their projects. They must be personally involved at all stages with a comprehensive perspective. This involves conscientious consideration of moral values, technical skills, and accountability for results rather than allowing responsibilities to be diffused. For example, the Challenger disaster showed how lack of accountability for safety issues due to organizational pressures contributed to loss of life.

Uploaded by

zahid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
164 views25 pages

Chapter 4 - Engineering As Social Experimentation

Engineers have a responsibility as experimenters to protect safety, obtain informed consent, and consider all impacts of their projects. They must be personally involved at all stages with a comprehensive perspective. This involves conscientious consideration of moral values, technical skills, and accountability for results rather than allowing responsibilities to be diffused. For example, the Challenger disaster showed how lack of accountability for safety issues due to organizational pressures contributed to loss of life.

Uploaded by

zahid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

ENGINEERING AS

SOCIAL
EXPERIMENTATION

Lecturer:
Megat Mohd Amzari Bin Megat
Mohd Aris
Engineers –Shared Responsibility
Engineers are not the sole experimenters but
also; managers, marketing people, public, etc.
however,“with knowledge comes responsibility”

Engineers are in a unique position to monitor


projects, identify risks, and evelop realities for
informed agreement.
An engineering professional will take on the
responsibility!
To fulfill their obligations as responsible experimenters, engineers
must:

 A primary obligation to protect the safety of human subjects,


providing a safe exit whenever possible, and respect their right of
informed consent.
 use imaginative forecasting of possible side effects, and
reasonable efforts to monitor them.
 have autonomous, personal involvement in all aspects of a
project.
 accept accountability for the results.
 display technical competence and other attributes of responsible
professionals.
For Remembrance
 Informing for consent (permission / agreement)
requires excellent communications skills in order to
provide appropriate information in an
understandable way.
 Also, cooperation with other disciplines is often
essential to assess potential side effects and monitor
effects of "social experiments" through engineering..
 Virtue of professional responsibility which includes: i)
self direction, ii) public spirited, iii) team work
iv) proficiency.
 Engineers should also display technical
competence and other attributes of
professionalism .
 Definite “Style” of Engineering
 Contemporary (current) Threats
Contemporary Threats

 Conscientiousness (thoroughness)
 Relevant Information
 Moral Autonomy
 Accountability
Responsible Experimentalists

1. Conscientiousness (thoroughness): Protect safety


knowledge, respect right of consent of public
2. Relevant Information / Comprehensive perspective:
Awareness of experimental nature of projects,
forecasting, monitoring
3. Moral autonomy: Personally engaged, thoughtful,
involvement in project
4. Accountability: Accept responsibility for results
of a project (avoid fragmentation, diffusion, time
pressures)
1.CONSCIENTIOUSNESS

 People act responsibly to the extent that they


conscientiously commit themselves to live
according to moral values .
 Self interest
 Moral Agents - Individuals who think solely of their
own good to the exclusion of the good of others
are not moral agents
Conscientiousness moral commitment
 a sensitivity to the full range of moral values
and responsibilities that are relevant to a
given situation
 Willingness to develop the skill and expend
the effort needed to reach the best balance
possible among those considerations .
 Conscientiousness implies consciousness
(in the sense of awareness), because intent is
not sufficient.
Open eyes, Open ears and an Open
mind are required to recognize a
given situation, its implications and
who is involved or affected.
Working Conditions
 The contemporary ( modern or present) working
conditions of engineers tend a narrow moral vision
solely to the obligations that accompany employee
status.
Engineers work benefits
 90% of engineers are salaried employees work
in large bureaucracies ( organizations or
administrations ) under great pressure to function
smoothly within the organization

 Benefits :Prudent self interest and concern for


one’s family  make it easy to emphasize as
primary the obligations to one‘s employer
Moral aspiration (goal)
Minimal negative duties:
 Not falsifying data

 Not violating patent rights

 Not breaching confidentiality


Engineering as Social
Experimentation
 Restores vision of engineers as guardians of the
public interest  professional duty it is to guard
the Welfare and safety of those affected by
engineering projects .
 Engineers should not impose their own views of
the social good upon society
2. RELEVANT INFORMATION
 Conscientiousness is blind without relevant factual
information.
 Shows moral concern that involves commitment to
obtain and properly assess all available
information pertinent to meeting one’s moral
obligations
 Grasp the context of one’s work( which makes it
count as an activity having a moral import )
 Specialization
 Division of Labor
Example
 A company may produce items with obsolescence
(uselessness) built into them , or the items might
promote unnecessary energy usage
 It is easy to place the burden on the sales
department : “Let them inform the customers”
 It may be natural to thus rationalize one’s neglect of
safety or cost considerations , but it shows no moral
concern.
 Consequences of what one does
 Regarding engineering as social
experimentation :
 Engineer should view his/her specialized

activities in a project as part of a larger whole


having a social impact.
 Goal is to practice “Defensive engineering “ or

“ preventive technology “
 Moral Responsibility
MORAL AUTONOMY
(Morally Self directed )

When People are morally autonomous (self ruling)?


 People are morally autonomous when their moral conduct
and principles of action are their own.
 Moral Beliefs and attitudes basis of Critical reflection

- Moral beliefs and attitudes must be held on the basis of


critical reflection rather than merely through passive adoption
ie... Particular conventions of one’s society, church or
profession
 Moral Beliefs and attitudes must integrate into the core of
an individual’s personality in a manner that leads to
committed action .
 Cannot be agreed abstractly and formally or verbally .
 Engineers working for an employer  sells one’s
labor and skills may make it seem that one has
thereby disowned and forfeited power over one’s
actions
 Viewing engineering as social experimentation can
help one overcome the above tendency .
ATTITUDE OF MANAGEMENT
 Plays a decisive (vital) role in how much moral
autonomy engineers feel they have.
 Long term interest
 Thoughtful &
 involvement in project
3. ACCOUNTABILITY
 Responsible people accept moral
responsibility for their actions.
 Accept responsibility for results of a
project
1. fragmentation,
2. dispersion,
3. time pressures
STUDY CASE: NASA
CHALENGGER 7 DISASTER

Brief introduction on the case :


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlpOYLJAGqA

Full documentary - Challenger: A Rush To Launch


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FehGJQlOf0

You might also like