Lecture 6 Design Thinking - Student Version
Lecture 6 Design Thinking - Student Version
THINKIN
G
BARBORA GULISOVA,
FALL 2020
DESIGN THINKING
• A SET OF PRINCIPLES
• A TOOL
• DIFFERENT TYPES OF COMPLEXITY -> NEED
FOR HELP TO MAKE SENSE OF THEM
Product-centric Customer-centric
User-experience-
Marketing-focused
focused
Source: Naiman (2019)
THINKING LIKE A DESIGNER
Customer/
Commitme Buy-in for
stakeholder
nt for the
involvemen
change innovation
t
WHO APPLIES DESIGN
THINKING?
• COMPANIES WHERE SOFTWARE IS FUNDAMENTAL PART OF THEIR
BUSINESS (E.G. IBM AND GE)
• ESTABLISHED COMPANIES:
• PRODUCTS -> SERVICES
• HARDWARE -> SOFTWARE
• PHYSICAL -> DIGITAL PRODUCTS
• GLOBALIZE INTEND
• COMPETITION FOCUS
Source: Kolko (2015)
• “GOING DIRECT TO CONSUMERS IS A BIG
DISRUPTOR… THERE ARE NEW OPPORTUNITIES
TO GATHER DATA AND INSIGHTS ABOUT
CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, LIKES, DISLIKES…
THOSE WHO HAVE DATA AND AN APPETITE FOR
INNOVATION WILL PREVAIL.”
- OLOF SCHYBERGSON, THE FOUNDER OF FJORD
Source: Kolko (2015)
DESIGN THINKING
• “COMPOSED OF MINDSETS AND ACTIONS THAT TOGETHER FORM A MULTI-
PLEX WHOLE” (NAKATA & HWANG, 2020)
• THREE SALIENT MINDSETS:
• HUMAN CENTEREDNESS
• ABDUCTIVE REASONING
• LEARNING BY FAILING
• WWW.CREATIVITYATWORK.COM
• KOLKO, J. (2015) DESIGN THINKING COMES OF AGE. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, SEPTEMBER
2015
• NAIMAN, L. (2019) DESIGN THINKING AS A STRATEGY FOR INNOVATION,
HTTPS://WWW.CREATIVITYATWORK.COM/DESIGN-THINKING-STRATEGY-FOR-INNOVATION/
• NAKATA & HWANG (2020) DESIGN THINKING FOR INNOVATION: COMPOSITION, CONSEQUENCE,
AND CONTINGENCY. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 118, PP. 117-128
• SCHRAGE, M. (1999). SERIOUS PLAY: HOW THE WORLD'S BEST COMPANIES SIMULATE TO INNOVATE.
HARVARD BUSINESS PRESS.