Rizal Chapter 24
Rizal Chapter 24
Chief Justice Loinel Cox denied the writ on the ground that
the Colon was carrying Spanish troops to the Philippines.
1. Documentary and
2. Testimonial
The documentary evidence:
1. A letter of Antonio Luna to Mariano Ponce, dated Madrid
October 16, 1888, showing Rizal’s connection with the Filipino
reform campaign in Spain.
2. A letter of Rizal to his family, dated Madrid, August 20,
1890, stating that the deportations are good for they will
encourage the people to hate tranny.
3. A letter from Marcelo H. del Pilar to Deodato Arellano, dated
Madrid, January 7, 1889, implicating Rizal in the Propaganda
campaign in Spain.
4. A poem entitled Kundiman, allegedly written by Rizal in
Manila on September 12, 1891.
KUNDIMAN
In the Orient beautiful
5. A letter of Carlos Oliver to an
Where the sun is born,
unidentified person, dated Barcelona,
In a land of beauty September 18, 1891, describing Rizal as
Full of enchantments the man to free the Philippines from
But bound in chains. Spanish oppression.
Where the despot reigns,
The land dearest to me. 6. A Masonic document, dated
Ah! that is my country, Manila, February 9, 1892,
She is a slave oppressed honoring Rizal for his patriotic
Groaning in the tyrant’s grips; services.
Lucky shall he be And Etc.
Who can give her liberty!
The testimonial evidence:
Martin Constantino
Aguedo del Rosario
Jose Reyes
Ambrosio Salvador
Antonio Salazar and
Francisco Quison.
November 26
From the beginning, when I had news of what, was being planned, I
opposed it, fought it, and demonstrated its absolute impossibility. This is
the truth, and witnesses to my words are still living. I was convinced that
the idea was highly absurd and, what was worse, would bring great
suffering. I did more.
When later, in spite of my counsels the movement
broke out, I spontaneously offered not only my
services, but my life, and even my name so that they
might use the, in the manner they saw fit to suppress
the rebellion, for, convinced of the evils that would be
fall them, I considered myself fortunate if, at any
sacrifice, I could prevent such useless misfortunes.
This is equally of record,
My countrymen: I have given proofs, more than anybody else, of desiring
liberties for our country and I still desire them. But I place as a premise the
education of the people so that by means of education and of labor they might
have a personality of their own and make themselves worthy of liberties. In
my writings I have recommended redemption. I have also written (and my
words have been repeated) that reforms, to be fruitful, have to come from
above, that those that come from below are irregular and unstable. Imbued
with these ideals, I cannot but condemn and I do condemn this absurd, savage
uprising planned behind my back, which dishonors us, the Filipinos, and
discredits those who may advocate our cause. I abhor its criminal methods
and disclaim all participation therein, pitying from the bottom of my heart the
unwary who have allowed themselves to be deceived. Return then to your
homes, and may God forgive those who have acted in bad faith.
Rizal’s Saddest Christmas.
December 25, 1896
Truly, the Christmas of 1896, his last on earth, was the
Jose Rizal
The Trial of Rizal
He was considered guilty before the actual trial
It accepted all charges and testimonies against him. And ignored
given the right (which any accused is entitled to have in a real court
of justice) to face the witnesses against him in open court.
Rizal sat on a bench between two soldiers. His arms were tied
behind, elbow to elbow, like a common felon. He was dressed in a
black woolen suit with a white vest and black tie. He was calm and
dignified in appearance.
When Lt. Taviel de Andrade took his seat, the court asked Rizal
whether he had anything to say. Rizal then read a supplement to his
defense which he wrote in his prison cell. In his supplementary
defense further proved his innocence by twelve points:
1. He could not be guilty of rebellion, for he advised Dr. Pio
Valenzuela in Dapitan not to rise in revolution.
2. He did not correspond with the radical, revolutionary
elements.
3. The revolutionists used his name without his knowledge. If
he were guilty he could have escaped in Singapore.
4. If he had a hand in the revolution, he could have escaped in
a Moro vinta and would not have built a home, a hospital,
and bought lands in Dapitan.
5. If he were the chief of the revolution, why was he not
consulted by the revolutionists?
6. It was true he wrote the by-laws of the Liga Filipina, but this
in only civic association—not a revolutionary society.
7. The Liga Filipina did not live long, for after the first meeting
he was banished to Dapitan and it died out.
8. If the Liga was reorganized nine months later, he did not
know about it.
9. The Liga did not serve the purpose of the revolutionists,
otherwise they would not have supplanted it with the
Katipunan.
10. If it were true that there were some bitter comments in
Rizal’s letter, it was because they were written in 1890 when
his family was being persecuted, being disposed of houses,
warehouses, lands, etc. and his brother and all his
brothers-in-law were deported.
11. His life in Dapitan and been exemplary as the politico-military
commanders and missionary priests could attest.
12. It was not true that the revolution was inspired by his one speech at
the house of Doroteo Ongjunco, as alleged by witnesses whom he
would like to confront. His friends knew his opposition to armed
rebellion. Why did the Katipunan send an emissary to Dapitan who
was unknown to him? Because those who knew him were aware that
he would never sanction any violent movement.
On the same day (December 26th), the court decision was submitted to
Governor General Polavieja. Immediately, Polavieja sought the opinion
of Judge Advocate General Nicolas de la Peña on the court decision. The
latter affirmed the death verdict.
Polavieja Signs Rizal’s Execution
December 28th-Polavieja approved the decision of court-martial and
ordered Rizal to be shot at 7:00 o’clock in the morning of December
30 at Bagumbayan Field (Luneta).
Manila December 28, 1896:
For compliance and the rest that may correspond, let this be returned to
the Judge Advocate, Captain Don Rafael Dominguez.
THANK YOU!!!