Global Strategic Management
Global Strategic Management
Advanced telecommunications
• Global Strategy
To sustain a competitive advantage
Competing against foreign and domestic companies
around the world
Why Global?
• Gain access to a larger market
Capitalize on market potential, such as China, India, and
emerging economies
• Liability of foreignness
1. Power distance
2. Individualism
3. Masculinity/femininity
4. Uncertainty-avoidance
5. Long-term orientation
Corporate Tax Rates
Joint Venture
Strategic Alliance
Franchising
Licensing
Exporting
Low
Low High
Degree of Ownership and Control
Adapted from Exhibit 7.7 Entry Modes for International Expansion
Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 7-31
Strategy around the World:
Cost Reduction vs. Local Responsiveness
• Local responsiveness:
Tailor product and service offerings to fit local
consumer preferences and host-country requirements
Higher cost
Example: McDonald’s uses mutton in India
•Cost reduction:
MNEs enter global marketplace with
the intention to reduce operation cost
Example: Toyota Prius
The Integration-Responsiveness Framework
Four Global Strategies
• International strategy
Leveraging home-based core competencies
Selling the same products or services in both domestic
and foreign markets
Example: Selling Starbucks coffee internationally
• Transnational strategy
Combination of localization strategy (high responsiveness)
with global standardization strategy (lowest cost position
attainable)
Example: German multimedia conglomerate Bertelsmann
: Caterpillar’s earth-moving equipment
Characteristics, Benefits, and Risks
of Four Types of Global Strategy
Characteristics Benefits Risk
• Often the first step in • Leveraging core • No or limited local
internationalizing. competence. responsiveness.
• Used by MNEs with relatively large • Economies of scale. • Highly affected
domestic markets (e.g., MNEs from • Low-cost implementation by exchange rate
U.S., Germany, Japan). through: fluctuations.
International • Well-suited for high-end products • Exporting or licensing • IP embedded in product
Strategy (such as machine tools) and luxury (for products) or service could be
goods that can be shipped across • Franchising (for services) expropriated.
the globe. • Licensing (for trademarks)
• Products and services tend to have
strong brands.
• Main competitive strategy tends to
be differentiation since exporting,
licensing, and franchising add
additional costs.
• Used by MNEs to compete in • Highest-possible local • Duplication of key
host countries with large and/or responsiveness. business functions
lucrative but idiosyncratic domestic • Reduced exchange-rate in multiple countries
Localization markets (e.g., Germany, Japan, exposure. leads to high cost of
(Multidomestic) Saudi Arabia). implementation.
Strategy • Often used in consumer products • Little or no economies of
and food industries. scale.
• Main competitive strategy is • Little or no learning across
differentiation. different regions.
• MNE wants to be perceived as local • Higher risk of IP
company. Expropriation.
Characteristics, Benefits, and Risks
of Four Types of Global Strategy
Characteristics Benefits Risk
Global- • Used by MNEs that are offering • Location economies: • No local responsiveness.
Standardization standardized products and services global division of labor • Little or no product
wages increase.
• Some risk of IP
expropriation.
Transnational • Used by MNEs that pursue an • Attempts to combine • Global matrix structure
(Glocalization) integration strategy at the business benefits of localization and is costly and difficult to
1–25
LO 10-1 Define globalization, multinational enterprise (MNE),
foreign direct investment (FDI), and global
strategy.
LO 10-2 Explain why companies compete abroad and evaluate
advantages and disadvantages.
LO 10-3 Explain which countries MNEs target for FDI, and how they
enter foreign markets.
LO 10-4 Describe the characteristics of and critically evaluate the
four different strategies MNEs can pursue when
competing globally.
LO 10-5 Explain why certain industries are more competitive in
specific nations than in others.
LO 10-6 Evaluate the relationship between location in a
regional cluster and firm-level competitive
advantage.
National Competitive Advantage
• Death-of-distance hypothesis
Geographic location alone should not lead to firm-level
competitive advantage because firms are now more able
to source inputs globally (ex: capital, commodities, etc.)
Labor markets also have become more global.
Computer manufacturers – China & Taiwan
Consumer electronics – Japan & South Korea
Mining companies – Australia
• Demand conditions
Specific characteristics of demand in a firm’s domestic market
• Competitive intensity
Highly competitive environments tend to stimulate
firms to outperform others (e.g., German car industry)
• Regional cluster
A group of interconnected companies and
institutions in a specific industry, located
near each other geographically and linked
by common characteristics
Knowledge spillover