Ethical and Legal Issues in HTA
Ethical and Legal Issues in HTA
in Health Technology
Assessment
2
Health technology assessment (HTA)
bodies must take a broad range of issues
into account during their analyses,
including ethical, social, and legal issues
that arise from the use (or non-use) of
health technologies.
3
Ethical issues in HTA
Ethical issues arising from health technologies have
become more prominent over the last several decades.
This is due to a combination of factors including:
Increasingly complex systems for delivering
increasingly complex care
• A reappraisal of the assumption that all technology is
good
• Recognition of the difficult choices that must be made
in allocating resources for health.
4
In the field of HTA, ethical issues arise in
particular around the following areas:
• Use of technology
• Conduct of research
• Allocating resources
5
Use of technology
6
For example, genetic testing to see how
likely an individual might be to develop a
disease has potentially different ethical
implications in healthy adults than in
unborn babies (prenatal testing).
7
While guidelines from an HTA bodies may define
medically appropriate care, individual
practitioners and patients are the ultimate
decision-makers regarding whether a technology
will be used or not in a particular case.
Assessing a technology can provide important
information about the balance between
beneficence (benefit) and non-maleficence (doing
no harm).
8
Using technologies that provide no benefit would
be inconsistent with the principle of beneficence.
HTA reports can identify situations where the use
or the absence of use of technology may run
counter to the principle of justice and give
appropriate recommendations for its use.
The same principles that are relevant to research in
humans are also relevant to technology use.
9
Conducting research
11
Allocating resources
12
• In discussions of resource allocation, equity
has come to mean fair allocation
• The distinction between equal and equitable
access depends on whether allocation
should reflect the need of the individual
patient (equity) or equal access by all
(equal)
13
The principle of equal allocation can lead to
an inequitable distribution of health
resources if those resources are limited.
For example: If a certain pill is distributed
equally, everyone in the population receives
one pill regardless of their need.
14
However, there may be some in the
population who need ten of the pills, but
who would be unable to get them because
of the limited amount of pills available.
Equitable distribution seeks to ensure that
those who most require the health
technology can access it.
15
Social issues in HTA
20
Additionally, HTA bodies must be aware that
stakeholders who disagree with an assessment’s
conclusions may turn to the courts.
Therefore, an HTA body that does not take
reasonable steps to ensure a high quality
assessment may itself be at risk of legal action
for failing to perform a responsible assessment.
21
Ethical, Legal, and Social
Issues (ELSI) checklist
1. Ethical
1.Does the introduction of the new medicine and
its potential use/non-use instead of the defined,
existing comparator(s) give rise to any new
ethical issues?
2.Does comparing the new medicine to the
defined, existing comparators point to any
difference that may be ethically relevant?
22
1. Organisational
1.Does the introduction of the new medicine and
its potential use/non-use instead of the defined,
existing comparators point to any differences
that may be organisationally relevant?
2.Does comparing the new medicine to the
defined, existing comparator(s) point to any
differences that may be organisationally
relevant?
23
1. Social
1.Does the introduction of the new medicine and
its potential use/non-use instead of the defined
existing comparator(s) give rise to any new
social issues?
2.Does comparing the new medicine to the
defined, existing comparator(s) point to any
differences that may be socially relevant?
24
1. Legal
1.Does the introduction of the new medicine and
its potential use/non-use instead of the defined,
existing comparator(s) give rise to any legal
issue?
2.Does comparing the new medicine to the
defined, existing comparators point to any
differences that may be legally relevant?
25