QUALITY
ASSURANCE
INTRODUCTION
DEFINITION
• “Quality assurance is the
judgment concerning the process
of acre based on the extent to
which that care contributes to
valued outcomes.”
• - Donabedian 1982
• “Quality assurance is the ongoing,
systematic, comprehensive
evaluation of health care services
and impact of these services on
health care services.”
- Kozier
OBJECTIVES
• To successfully achieve sustained
improvement in health care.
• Clinics need to design processes to
meet the needs of patients.
• To monitor, analyze and improve
their performance to improve
patient outcomes.
PURPOSES/ NEED
• Rising expectation of consumer of
services.
• Improvement of job satisfaction.
• Highly informed consumer.
• To prevent rising medical errors.
• Reducing global boundaries.
• Rise in health insurance industry.
PRINCIPLES
• Quality management (QM) most effectively
within a flat, democratic and organizational
structure.
• Managers and workers must be committed to
quality improvement.
• The goal of QM is to improve systems and
processes and not to assign blame.
• Customers define quality.
• Decisions must be based on data.
APPRAOCHES
• GENERAL APPROACH
• SPECIFIC APPROACH
ELEMENTS/ COMPONENTS
• Acc to Donabedian
• Structure element
• Process element
• outcome element
• Acc to Manwell, Shaw: 3A’s and 3 E’s
• 3A:
• Access to healthcare
• Acceptability
• Appropriateness and relevance to need
• 3 E’s:
• Effectiveness
• Equity
• Efficency
STANDARDS
• AREA OF QA:
• In-aptient dept
• Out-patient dept
• Emergency medical services
• Specialty services
• training
MODELS
• DONABEDIAN MODEL:
ANA MODEL
QUALITY HEALTH OUTCOME MODEL
PDSA MODEL
SIX SIGMA MODEL
QUALITY
ASSURANCE
CYCLE/ STEPS
NURSING AUDIT
• DEFINITON:
• “Nursing audit refers to the assessment of the
quality of clinical nursing.
• -Elison
• “It is a means by which nurses themselves can
define standards from their point of view and
describe the actual practice of nursing.”
• - Goster walfer
CHARACTERISTICS
• Improves quality of nursing care.
• Compares actual standards with
agreed standards of practice.
• It is formal and systemic.
• Involves peer review.
OBJECTIVES
• To evaluate the quality of nursing
care given.
• To achieve the desired and feasible
quality of care.
• To provide way for better records.
• To focus on care provided and care
provider
ADVANTAGES/ DISADVANTAGES
• ADVANTAGES
• Patient is assured of good service.
• It develops openness to change.
• It reduces complaints and blames.
• It increases the understanding of client’s
expressions.
DISADVANTAGES
• May be considered as a punishment to
professional group.
• Many components mat make analysis difficult.
• It is time consuming
• Requires a team of trained auditors
•THANK
YOU