0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views38 pages

Chapter 14

Uploaded by

cassandra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views38 pages

Chapter 14

Uploaded by

cassandra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

Chapter 14

Statistical
Process
Control

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 1
Statistical Process Control
(SPC)
A methodology for monitoring a process
to identify special causes of variation
and signal the need to take corrective
action when appropriate
 SPC relies on control charts

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 2
Histograms vs. Control Charts
 Histograms do not take into account
changes over time.
 Control charts can tell us when a process
changes

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 3
Control Chart Applications

 Establish state of statistical control


 Monitor a process and signal when it
goes out of control
 Determine process capability

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 4
Key Idea

Process capability calculations make little


sense if the process is not in statistical
control because the data are confounded
by special causes that do not represent
the inherent capability of the process.

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 5
Capability Versus Control

Control
Capability In Control Out of Control

Capable IDEAL

Not Capable

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 6
Commonly Used Control
Charts
 Variables data
 x-bar and R-charts
 x-bar and s-charts

 Charts for individuals (x-charts)

 Attribute data
 For “defectives” (p-chart, np-chart)
 For “defects” (c-chart, u-chart)

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 7
Developing Control Charts
1. Prepare
 Choose measurement
 Determine how to collect data, sample size,
and frequency of sampling
 Set up an initial control chart

2. Collect Data
 Record data
 Calculate appropriate statistics
 Plot statistics on chart

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 8
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 9
Next Steps
3. Determine trial control limits
 Center line (process average)
 Compute UCL, LCL

4. Analyze and interpret results


 Determine if in control
 Eliminate out-of-control points
 Recompute control limits as necessary

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 10
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 11
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 12
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 13
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 14
Key Idea

When a process is in statistical control,


the points on a control chart fluctuate
randomly between the control limits with
no recognizable pattern.

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 15
Typical Out-of-Control Patterns

 Point outside control limits


 Sudden shift in process average
 Cycles
 Trends
 Hugging the center line
 Hugging the control limits
 Instability

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 16
Shift in Process Average

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 17
Identifying Potential Shifts

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 18
Cycles

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 19
Trend

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 20
Final Steps
5. Use as a problem-solving tool
 Continue to collect and plot data

 Take corrective action when necessary

6. Compute process capability

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 21
Key Idea

Control charts indicate when to take


action, and more importantly, when to
leave a process alone.

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 22
Process Capability
Calculations

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 23
Spreadsheet Template

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 24
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 25
Special Variables Control
Charts

 x-barand s charts
 x-chart for individuals

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 26
Key Idea

Control charts for individuals offer the


advantage of being able to draw
specifications on the chart for direct
comparison with the control limits.

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 27
Charts for Attributes
 Fraction nonconforming (p-chart)
 Fixed sample size
 Variable sample size

 np-chart for number nonconforming

 Charts for defects


 c-chart
 u-chart

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 28
Key Idea

Confusion often exists over which chart


is appropriate for a specific application,
because the c- and u-charts apply to
situations in which the quality
characteristics inspected do not
necessarily come from discrete units.

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 29
Control Chart Formulas

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 30
Control Chart Selection
Quality Characteristic
variable attribute
defective defect
no
n>1? x and MR
yes constant
yes constant
p or sampling
sample
np unit?
n>=10 or no size?
x and R
computer? yes no
no
yes
p-chart with c u
x and s variable sample
size
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 31
Control Chart Design Issues
 Basis for sampling
 Sample size
 Frequency of sampling
 Location of control limits

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 32
Key Idea

In determining the method of sampling,


samples should be chosen to be as
homogeneous as possible so that each
sample reflects the system of common
causes or assignable causes that may be
present at that point in time.

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 33
Key Idea

In practice, samples of about five have


been found to work well in detecting
process shifts of two standard deviations
or larger. To detect smaller shifts in the
process mean, larger sample sizes of 15
to 25 must be used.

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 34
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 35
Economic Tradeoffs

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 36
Pre-Control

LTL UTL

Red Red
Zone Green Zone Zone

nominal
value

Yellow Zones
MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 37
Key Idea

Pre-control is not an adequate substitute


for control charts and should only be
used when process capability is no
greater than 88 percent of the tolerance,
or equivalently, when Cp is at least 1.14.
If the process mean tends to drift, then
Cp should be higher.

MANAGING FOR QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE, 7e, © 2008 Thomson Higher Education Publishing 38

You might also like