Time Cost Trade Off Appendix A 30-5-08 F
Time Cost Trade Off Appendix A 30-5-08 F
TIME-COST TRADE-OFF
Step-by-step Procedure
1. Time analyse the network and determine the critical
path.
2. Tabulate Normal and Crash Time & Cost Data
3. Determine the rate of crashing of all the activities
4. Crash critical activities beginning with the activity
having the least rate of crashing
5. At each crashing, incorporate the cost implication in a
table.
6. Add direct cost, indirect cost and saving for early
completion, date-wise and tabulate their
commutative effect.
1. Time analyse the network and
determine the activity costs.
2. Tabulate Normal and Crash Time & Cost Data
The Assessed Crashed Costs and the Crashing Potential for a Project
Crashin
S. No. Activity Duration in Weeks Cost in $ g
Potential
Normal Crash Normal Crash in weeks
1 A 4 2 4000 7000 2
2 B 3 2 3000 4000 1
3 C 2 2 2000 2000 X
4 D 5 3 2000 5000 2
5 E 2 1 2000 4000 1
6 F 1 1 1000 1000 X
7 G 3 2 3000 8000 1
8 H 3 2 3000 5000 1
9 I 2 1 2000 3000 1
3. Determine the rate of
crashing of all the activities
A 2 1500
B 1 1000
First crashing.
With the crashing by one week of Activity B, the cost of
the project increases by $1,000 and the revised project
duration works out to be 9 weeks.
Second crashing.
Scrutiny of the network after the first crashing reveals that
there are two critical paths. Further, reduction means that the
sum of the durations of the critical activities along each critical
path be reduced by one week. The total increase in the cost for
crashing the project duration from 10 weeks to 8 weeks is
$2,500, i.e. cost of crashing Activities A and B each by one
week.
Third crashing.
The number of critical paths increase after the second
crashing. The various ways of reducing the project time
during the third crashing are utilized and the revised
duration of the activities for 7 weeks completion time is
given in the network drawn below.
Determining Course of Action of Reducing Project Time During Third Crashing
Cost in 000'$
Minimum Project Cost =$26,700