Farjana Roll-699, Date-23.04.2024
Farjana Roll-699, Date-23.04.2024
Presentation
PRESENTED BY FARJANA AKTER
Explanatory Sequential
In an explanatory sequential design, quantitative data collection and analysis occurs first, followed by qualitative data collection and analysis.
We should use this design if you think your qualitative data will explain and contextualize our quantitative findings.
Example: Analyze the accident statistics first and draw preliminary conclusions about which areas are most dangerous. Based on these findings,
we conduct interviews with cyclists in high-accident areas and analyze complaints qualitatively.
We can utilize the qualitative data to explain why accidents occur on specific roads, and take a deep dive into particular problem areas.
Exploratory Sequential
In an exploratory sequential design, qualitative data collection and analysis occurs first, followed by quantitative data collection and analysis.
We can use this design to first explore initial questions and develop hypotheses. Then we can use the quantitative data to test or confirm your
qualitative findings.
Example: We first interview cyclists to develop an initial understanding of problem areas, and draw preliminary conclusions. Then we analyze
accident statistics to test whether cyclist perceptions line up with where accidents occur.
When to use mixed methods research
Mixed methods research may be the right choice if research process suggests that quantitative or qualitative
data alone will not sufficiently answer your research question. There are several common reasons for using
mixed methods research:
• Generalizability: Qualitative research usually has a smaller sample size, and thus is not generalizable. In
mixed methods research, this comparative weakness is mitigated by the comparative strength of “large N,”
externally valid quantitative research.
• Contextualization: Mixing methods allows to put findings in context and add richer detail to your conclusions.
Using qualitative data to illustrate quantitative findings can help “put meat on the bones” of your analysis.
• Credibility: Using different methods to collect data on the same subject can make results more credible. If the
qualitative and quantitative data converge, this strengthens the validity of your conclusions. This process is
called triangulation.
Advantage Disadvantage
detailed, contextualized insights of qualitative data and the generalizable, analyzing, and synthesizing two types of data into one research
externally valid insights of quantitative data. The strengths of one type of product takes a lot of time and effort, For this reason, mixed methods
data often mitigate the weaknesses of the other. research has the potential to cost much more than standalone studies.
Solely qualitative studies are often not very generalizable, only reflecting Differing or conflicting results
the experiences of your participants, so adding quantitative data can If analysis yields conflicting results, it can be very challenging to
validate qualitative findings. know how to interpret them in a mixed methods study. If the
Method flexibility quantitative and qualitative results do not agree it can be unclear how
Mixed methods are less tied to disciplines and established research to proceed.
paradigms. They offer more flexibility in designing research, allowing to Due to the fact that quantitative and qualitative data take two vastly
combine aspects of different types of studies to distill the most informative different forms, it can also be difficult to find ways to systematically