CHAPTER SEVEN
DECISION ANALYSIS AND THEORY
1
DECISSION ANALYSIS AND THEORY
Decision Analysis in case of Certainty
Decision Analysis in case of Uncertainty
Decision Analysis in case of Risk
What Is a Decision?
• This module is about using analytical models to find solutions to complex
• decisions.
• . Most individuals go through their daily work without making any decisions.
• They react to events without taking the time to think about them. When the
phone rings, they automatically answer it if they are available. In these
situations, they are not deciding but just working.
• Sometimes, however, they need to make decisions. If they have to hire
someone and there are many applicants, they need to
• make a decision.
• One situation is making a decision as opposed to following a routine.
• To make a decision is to arrive at a final solution after
• consideration, ending dispute about what to do.
• A decision is made when a course of action is selected among alternatives.
• A decision has the following
• five components:
• 1. Multiple alternatives or options are available.
• 2. Each alternative leads to a series of consequences.
• 3. The decision maker is uncertain about what might happen.
• 4. The decision maker has different preferences about outcomes associated with
various consequences.
• 5. A decision involves choosing among uncertain outcomes with different values.
What Is Decision Analysis?
• Analysis is defined as the separation of a whole into its component
parts.
• Decision analysis is the process of separating a complex decision into
its component parts and using a mathematical formula to reconstitute
the whole decision from its parts.
• It is a method of helping decision makers choose the best alternative
by thinking through the decision maker’s preferences and values and
by restructuring complex problems into simple ones.
• An analyst typically makes a mathematical model of the decision.
What Is a Model?
• A model is an abstraction of the events an relationships influencing a
decision.
• It usually involves a mathematical formula relating the various
concepts together.
• The relationships in the model are usually quantified using numbers.
• A model tracks the relationship among various parts of a decision and
helps the decision maker see the whole picture.
Introduction
The decision theory (decision analysis) is used to determine
optimal strategies where a decision maker is faced with
several decision alternatives and an uncertain, or risky,
pattern of future events.
All decision making situations are characterized by the fact
that two or more alternative course of action are available to
the decision maker to choose from.
7
2.1. Basic Concepts in Decision Making
The decision making process involves the
following steps:
1.Identification of the various possible outcomes
(state of natures, events).
The events are beyond the control of the decision
maker.
2. Identification of all the courses of action
(strategies) available to the decision maker.
The decision maker has control over choice of these.
8
Cont...
3. Determination of the pay off function which describes
the consequences resulting from different combination
of events and acts.
4. Choose among the various alternatives on the base of
some criteria.
9
Pay-off Table
Depicts the economics of the given problem.
Pay- Off is a conditional value (a conditional profit, loss
or cost).
A pay-off table thus represents the matrix of the
conditional values associated with all the possible
combinations of the acts and the events.
While constructing a pay-off matrix, the alternative
course of action and the possible outcomes must be
clearly determined. In any given situation, the listing of
events and actions must be distinct and mutually
exclusive.
10
Cont...
After setting up the pay off table we proceed to take
the decision.
There are several rules or criteria on the base of
which decision may be taken. The selection depends
on factors like:
Nature of the decision situation
Attitude of the decision maker and other factors.
We will discuss the decision rules for taking decision
under different conditions.
11
Degree of Certainty
The approach used by the decision maker often
depends on the degree of certainty that exists.
There can be different degrees of certainty.
1. Decision making Under Complete Certainty
2. Decision making Under Complete Uncertainty
3. Decision making Under Risk
12
1. Decision Making under Certainty
It is the simplest of all circumstances occurs when the
decision making takes place in an environment of
complete certainty.
The main characteristics of this decision making is
that the decision maker know, with certainty, which
event will occur. He has perfect information about
the outcomes.
He need only consider one event and the method of
solution is obvious. (He can look at the outcome for
each alternative, and choose the best outcome.)
13
Example
14
Cont…
If we know that S2 will occur, the decision maker then can focus on
the first raw of the payoff table. Because alternative A1 has the
largest profit (16), it would be selected.
15
2. Decision Making Under Complete
Uncertainty
The decision situation where there is no way in which
the decision maker can assess the probabilities of the
various states of nature.
In such situations, the decision maker has no idea at
all as to which of the possible states of nature would
occur nor has a reason to believe why a given state is
more, or less likely to occur as another.
16
Cont...
With probabilities of the various outcomes
unknown the actual decisions are based on specific
criteria.
There are several decision criteria to recommend a
solution for this kind of problems.
1. Maximax
2. Maximin
3. Minimax regret
17
1. Maximax (Minimin) 18
Decision
The maximax principle is optimists’ principle of
choice.
This optimist criterion attempts to describe the
decision-making behavior of people who are
perfectly optimistic in their expectations.
An optimistic decision maker is attracted by large
rewards and is willing to risk high losses in order to
obtain them.
Steps in Maximax
Maximax" is shorthand for "Maximum of the (row)
maxima."
1. For each action alternative (matrix row) determine
the maximum payoff possible.
2. From these maxima, select the maximum payoff. The
action alternative leading to this payoff is the chosen
decision.
19
Cont...
It is possible to model the optimist profile with the
MAXIMAX decision rule (when the payoffs are
positive-flow rewards) such as profits or revenue.
When payoffs are given as negative-flow rewards,
(such as costs) the optimist decision rule is MINIMIN.
Note that negative-flow rewards are expressed with
positive numbers.)
20
Cont...
21
The decision is shown by circling the maximax value,
thus indicating the row of the chosen action alternative:
22
2. Maximin (Minimax) Decision
This principle is adopted by pessimistic decision makers who are
conservative in their approach.
They assume that the worst outcome will occur. Then it chooses the
alternative that gives the best of these worst outcomes.
It is possible to model the pessimist profile with the MAXIMIN
decision rule (when the payoffs are positive-flow rewards, such as
profits or income.
When payoffs are given as negative-flow rewards, the pessimist
decision rule is MINIMAX.)
23
Rule
1. For each action alternative (matrix row)
determine the minimum payoff possible. This
represents the worst possible outcome if that
strategy were chosen.
2. From these minima, select the maximum
payoff. The action alternative leading to this
payoff is the chosen decision
24
Using our matrix defined previously:
25
26
3. Minimax Regret Decision
Sometimes we are judged not by how well we actually
do, but how well we could possibly have done.
In such cases there is a regret- the difference
between the actual outcome and best possible
outcome.
It is the decision criterion that we discussed by basing
the opportunity cost of the alternatives (savage Min
iMax Regret).
27
Cont…
The Minimax Regret criterion focuses on avoiding the
worst possible consequences that could result when
making a decision
Regret is defined as the opportunity loss to the
decision maker if action alternative Ai is chosen and
state of nature Sj happens to occur.
It is an approach that does take all payoffs into
account.
28
In order to use this approach, it is necessary to
develop an opportunity loss table.
Opportunity loss (OL) is the payoff difference
between the best possible outcome under Sj and the
actual outcome resulting from choosing Ai given that
Sj occurs.
29
Minimax Regret Rule
1.For each event find the best possible outcome (the
best entry in each column)
2. Find the regret for every entry in the column (the
difference between the best and the entry).
It is the amount of payoff the decision maker would
miss by not having chosen the alternative that would
have yielded the best payoff if that state of nature
occurs.
3. Put the regrets found in step 2 in to regret matrix.
There is at least one zero in each column and regret
are always positive.
30
Cont...
4. For each alternative find the highest regret.
5. Choose the alternative with the lowest value of these
highest regrets.
Let's analyze our previous problem using opportunity
losses instead of the monetary payoffs. First it must
derive the Opportunity Lose matrix from the payoff
matrix R.
31
Cont...
where the star denotes "best payoff under state of nature Sj ".
32
Cont…
The OL matrix can now be obtained by subtracting each
entry Rij from its column's best payoff.
The minimax rule is then applied to the OL (regret) matrix:
33
Opportunity Loss matrix
A S
H M W
L 15-15=0 4-3=1 1- -6=7
JR 15-9= 6 4-4=0 1- -2= 3
S 15-3 =12 4-2=2 1 - 1= 0
34
Cont...
35
3. Decision Making Under Risk
The difference between decision making under
uncertainty and risk is the presence of probabilities
for the occurrence of the various states of nature
under decision making under risk.
The probabilities may be:
Subjective estimates from managers
Subjective estimates from experts in the field
Historical frequencies
36
Cont...
If they are reasonably correct, they provide the
decision maker with additional information that can
dramatically improve the decision making process.
The sum of the probabilities for all states of nature
must be 1.00.
Three approaches are used:
Expected Monetary Value (EMV)
Expected Opportunity Loss
Expected Value of Perfect Information
37
1. Criteria of Expected Monetary Value (EMV)
EMV approach provides the decision maker with a value which
represents an average payoff for each alternative.
The best alternative is, then, the one that has the highest
expected monetary value.
The average or expected payoff of each alternative is weighted
average; the state of nature probabilities are used to weight
the respective payoffs.
Thus the expected monetary value is:
EMV (Ai ) = E (Ai ) = Σj pj ( Rij )
And using the probability distribution estimated by the
managers of the company, we obtain:
38
Cont...
39
2. Criteria of Expected Opportunity
Loss
Using Expected Opportunity Loss (EOL) is an alternate
method for incorporating probabilities in to a
decision making process.
The approach is nearly the same to the EMV
approach, except that a table of opportunity losses is
used rather than a table of payoff.
40
The opportunity losses for each alternative are
weighted by the probabilities of their respective
states of nature, and the alternative with the smallest
expected loss is selected as the best.
EOL (Ai ) = E (Ai ) = Σj pj ( OLij )
41
Cont...
42
3. Expected Value of Perfect
Information
Sometimes the decision maker might opt to delay a
decision until it is evident which state of nature is
going to materialize (be certain).
Such delays will involve a cost of some sort.
Hence, the question is whether the cost of waiting
outweighs the potential benefits that could be
realized.
43
Cont...
If it would be worth the cost to refine or eliminate
probabilities of states of natures.
The EVPI is thus, the measure of the difference
between the certain payoff that could be realized
under a condition of certainty and expected payoff
under condition involving risk.
44
Cont...
The probabilities of the original state of nature can be
used to weight the payoff, one of which will occur
under certainty. This is called the expected payoff
under certainty (EPC).
EVPI = Σj pj (Rij*)
Where; Rij* is the best payoff under state Sj
45
Cont...
46
Cont...
EPC = 0.1(15) + .6(4) + .3(1) = 4.2
The difference between this figure and the expected payoff
under risk (EMV) is the expected value of perfect information.
EVPI=EPC-EMV
EVPI= 4.2 - 2.7 =1.5
Perfect information would increase ACME's
expected payoff by $1.5 million, so that is what
the perfect information is worth.
47
Cont...
The expected opportunity loss due to imperfect
information is equal to the expected payoff that could
be achieved by having perfect information.
Therefore EVPI is always equal to EOL
EVPI=EOL
48
Thank You!
49