Scribd
Upload
9 views16 pages

Channel Capacity of MIMO Channels Channel Capacity of MIMO Channels

Uploaded by

waleed ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
9 views16 pages

Channel Capacity of MIMO Channels Channel Capacity of MIMO Channels

Uploaded by

waleed ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Channel

Channel Capacity
Capacity of
of MIMO
MIMO
Channels
Channels

指導教授：黃文傑 老師
學 生：曾凱霖
學 號： M9121014

無線通訊實驗室
Outline
1 、 Introduction
2 、 Shannon capacity of MIMO
systems
3 、 The ”pipe” interpretation
4 、 To exploit the MIMO channel
– BLAST
– Space Time Coding
5 、 Conclusion
Why multiple
antennas ????

• Frequency and time processing


are at limits.
• Space processing is interesting
because it does not increase
bandwidth.
Initial Assumptions

• Flat fading channel (Bcoh>> 1/ Tsymb)


• Slowly fading channel (Tcoh>> Tsymb)
• n receive and nt transmit antennas
r
• Receiver estimates the channel
perfectly
• We consider space diversity only
SISO Systems
h x(t): transmitted signal
y(t): received signal
h(t): channel transfer function
n(t): noise (AWGN, 2)
y(t)
x(t)
y(t) = h • x(t) + n(t)
PT
Signal to noise ratio : ρ  2
σ
Capacity : C = log2(1+)
Receive Diversity
H11

H21

 PT *
C log 2 det  I  2 HH 
 σ nt 
= log2[1+(PT2)·|H|2] [bit/(Hz·s)]
Capacity increases logarithmically
with number of receive antennas... H = [ H11 H21]
Transmit Diversity /
Beamforming

H11

H12

Cdiversity = log2(1+(PT2)·|H|2)
[bit/(Hz·s)]

•Capacity increases logarithmically with nt


MIMO Systems
H H12 
H11 H  11
H 22 
 H 21
H21
H12

H22 Where the i are the


eigenvalues to HH†
Cdiversity = log2det[I +(PT2 )·HH†]=
 P   P 
log 2 1  T 2 1   log 2 1  T 2 2 
 2   2 

Interpretation: 
Transmitter Receiver

m=min(nr, nt) parallel channels,
equal power allocated to each ”pipe”
MIMO Capacity in General
H unknown at TX H known at TX
 P  m
 p 
C log 2 det  I  2T HH *   C  log 2 1  i 2 i 
  nt  i 1   
m
 P 
 log 2 1  2T i  Where the power distribution over
  nt 
”pipes” are given by a water filling
i 1
solution

m min(nr , nt )

p1 
p2 
p3 
p4 
The Channel
Eigenvalues
Orthogonal channels HH† =I, 1= 2= …= m= 1

m
 PT 
Cdiversity  log 2 1  2 i  min(nt , nr ) log 2 (1  PT /  2 nt )
i 1   nt 

• Capacity increases linearly with min( nr , nt )


• An equal amount of power PT/nt is allocated
to each ”pipe”

Transmitter Receiver
To Exploit the MIMO
Channel
Bell Labs Layered
Space Time Architecture

• nr  nt required
• Symbol by symbol
Time
detection. Using nulling
Antenna

s1 s1 s1 s1 s1 s1
s2 s2 s2 s2 s2 s2 V-BLAST and symbol cancellation
s3 s3 s3 s3 s3 s3
• V-BLAST implemented -
s0 s1 s2 s0 s1 s2 98 by Bell Labs (40
s0 s1 s2 s0 s1 D-BLAST
s0 s1 s2 s0 bps/Hz)

{G.J.Foschini, Bell Labs Technical Journal 1996 }


Space Time Coding

• Use parallel channel to obtain diversity not


spectral efficiency as in BLAST
• Space-Time trellis codes : coding and
diversity gain (require Viterbi
detector)
• Space-Time block codes : diversity gain
(use outer code to get coding
gain)
• nr= 1 is possible
• Properly designed codes acheive diversity
of nr nt
Orthogonal Space-time Block
Codes
Block of T
symbols
Constellation
mapper

Data in nt transmit
STBC antennas

Block of K
symbols
• K input symbols, T output symbols T K
• R=K/T is the code rate
• If R=1 the STBC has full rate
• If T= nt the code has minimum delay
• Detector is linear !!!
STBC for 2 Transmit
Antennas
Full rate and
minimum delay
 c0  c1* 
[ c 0 c1 ]   * 
 c1 c0 
Antenna

Time

Assume 1 RX antenna:

Received signal at time 0 r0 h1c0  h2 c1  n0


Received signal at time 1 r1  h1c1*  h2 c0*  n1
r H c  n

 r0   h1 h2   n0   c0 
r  *  , H  * *
, n  *  , c  
 r1   h2  h1   n1   c1 

~ * * * 2 ~
r H r H H c  H n  H F c  n
Diagonal matrix due to orthogonality

The MIMO/ MISO system is in fact


transformed to an equivalent SISO
system with SNR

SNReq = || H ||F2 SNR/nt  


|| H ||F2 =  
Conclusion
• MIMO systems are a promising
technique for high data rates.
• Their efficiency depends on the
channel between the
transmitters and the receivers
(power and correlation).
• Practical issues need to be
resolved.

You might also like