Scl Delay and Disruption Protocol r3
Scl Delay and Disruption Protocol r3
DELAY
PROTOCO
L
- 2 EDITION - ND
BY SOCIETY OF CONTRACT LAW
Delays
Disruptions
CONTENT
Core Principles
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
• This protocol provide a guidance on common delays
and disruptions of a construction project where one
party tries to recover it by,
• an Extension of Time (EOT) and / or
• a Compensation.
• Most of the delay and disruption cases become
disputes involving 3rd parties for dispute resolution.
• This number can be reduced via implementing a
transparent and unified approach by understanding
programmed works, records and responsibility
allocation for the consequences for delay and
disruption events.
DELAYS
• Both Delays and Disruptions are effects of events, the impacts on the
works are different.
a) Relief from LDs (with the inverse claim by an Employer for LDs);
TYPES OF
Em
DELAYS
Con
plo trac
yer tor
Ris Ris
k k
Del Del
ay
Delays caused by the employer or
ay
Delays that arise from Contractor's
client outside the contractor's control. own actions or inactions.
Examples: Examples:
•Changes in project scope • Poor project management or
initiated by the employer. scheduling.
•Delays in providing necessary • Failure to mobilize resources or
approvals or permits. labor as planned.
•Failure to make timely decisions • Delays caused by subcontractors
or provide information. or suppliers.
•Delays in funding or payment • Inadequate work quality leading
issues. to rework.
Sensitivity: LNT Construction General Business
4
DISRUPTIONS
• ‘Disruption’ - disturbance, hindrance or interruption to a
Contractor’s normal working methods, resulting in lower
productivity or efficiency in the execution of particular work
activities.
• It will lead to
a) Activity delay
Program
Progress me
Records Records
RECORDS Resourc
e
Costs
Records
TYPES Records
Correspond
ence Contrac
& t&
Administrati Tender
on Docume
Records nts
2.PURPOSE OF EOT
• Benefit to the Contractor • Benefit to the Employer
To relieve him of liability for damages It establishes a new contract
for delay (i.e.:- LDs) for any period completion date, prevents time for
prior to the extended contract completion of the works becoming ‘at
completion date and allows for large’ and allows for coordination /
reprogramming of the works to planning of its own activities.
completion.
• Employer Risk Event impacts the critical path of the works and
thus extends the contract completion date.
6.Effect of Delay
To grant an EOT, it is not necessary for the Employer Risk Event
already to have begun to affect the Contractor’s progress with the
works, or for the effect of the Employer Risk Event to have ended.
Unless there is express provision to the contrary in the contract, where there is
remaining total float in the programme at the time of an Employer Risk Event, an
EOT should only be granted to the extent that the Employer Delay is predicted to reduce to
below zero the total float on the critical path affected by the Employer Delay to Completion
(i.e. if the Employer Delay is predicted to extend the critical path to completion).
This result will occur only if at the time entering into the contract, the Employer is aware of
the Contractor’s intention to complete the works prior to the contract completion date,
and that intention is realistic and achievable
SUMMARY
OF DELAY
ANALYSIS
METHODS
17.Gloabal Claims
The not uncommon practice of contractors making composite or global claims
without attempting to substantiate cause and effect is discouraged by the Protocol.
A global claim is where a contractor makes a claim for a single amount of money by reference to multiple
underlying causes or events.
18.DISRUPTION CLAIMS
Compensation may be recovered for disruption
only to the extent that the contract permits or
there is an available cause of action at law.
19.VALUATION OF VARIATIONS
Total likely effect of variations should be pre-agreed between the Employer/CA and the
Contractor to arrive at, if possible, a fixed price of a variation, to include not only the
direct costs (labour, plant and materials) but also the time-related and disruption costs,
an agreed EOT and the necessary revisions to the programme.
• The objective is to put the Contractor in the same financial position it would have
been if the Employer Risk Event had not occurred.
when the effect of the Employer Risk Event was felt, not by
reference to the extended period at the end of the contract.
• Interest may also be a component of damages if it can be shown that the loss was actually suffered as a
result of a breach of the contract, and the loss was in the contemplation of the parties at the time of
contracting.
• HEAD
There are also statutory OFFICE
rights OVERHEADS
to interest. AND
Considering claims for prolongation costs (& other monetary
claims) parties should be aware of statutory rights to interest available to an adjudicator, judge or arbitrator
should they not resolve their dispute.
PROFIT
• In an Employer Delay to Completion, a Contractor will include a claim for the lost contribution to head
office overheads and the lost opportunity to earn profit.
• To recover unabsorbed overheads and lost profit, the Contractor must demonstrate it has:
(a) failed to recover the overheads and earn the profit it could reasonably have expected during the
period of prolongation; and
(b) CLAIM
been unable to recover such PREPARATION
overheads and earn such profit because its resources were tied up by
Employer Risk Events.
COSTS
• In case, if the Contractor can show that it has been put to additional cost as a result of the unreasonable
actions or inactions of the CA in dealing with the Contractor’s claim.