0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views33 pages

Chapter 3 Gate-Level Minimization

The document discusses gate-level minimization in digital logic design, focusing on methods such as Karnaugh maps for simplifying Boolean functions. It provides examples of two-variable, three-variable, and four-variable maps, as well as techniques for prime implicants and the implementation of NAND and NOR gates. Additionally, it covers exclusive-OR and exclusive-NOR functions, highlighting their properties and implementations.

Uploaded by

alakib050
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views33 pages

Chapter 3 Gate-Level Minimization

The document discusses gate-level minimization in digital logic design, focusing on methods such as Karnaugh maps for simplifying Boolean functions. It provides examples of two-variable, three-variable, and four-variable maps, as well as techniques for prime implicants and the implementation of NAND and NOR gates. Additionally, it covers exclusive-OR and exclusive-NOR functions, highlighting their properties and implementations.

Uploaded by

alakib050
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

Digital Logic Design

Gate-Level Minimization
3-1 Introduction
 Gate-level minimization refers to the design task of finding an optimal gate-
level implementation of Boolean functions describing a digital circuit.
3-2 The Map Method
 The complexity of the digital logic gates
 The complexity of the algebraic expression

 Logic minimization
 Algebraic approaches: lack specific rules
 The Karnaugh map
 A simple straight forward procedure
 A pictorial form of a truth table

 A diagram made up of squares


 Each square represents one minterm
Review of Boolean Function
 Boolean function
 Sum of minterms
 Sum of products (or product of sum) in the simplest form
 A minimum number of terms
 A minimum number of literals
Two-Variable Map
 A two-variable map
 Four minterms
 x' = row 0; x = row 1
 y' = column 0; y =
column 1
 A truth table in square
diagram
 Fig. 3.2(a): xy = m3 Figure 3.1 Two-variable Map
 Fig. 3.2(b): x+y =
x'y+xy' +xy =
m1+m2+m3

Figure 3.2 Representation of functions in the map


A Three-variable Map
 A three-variable map
 Eight minterms
 The Gray code sequence
 Any two adjacent squares in the map differ by only one variable
 Primed in one square and unprimed in the other
 e.g., m5 and m7 can be simplified
 m5+ m7 = xy'z + xyz = xz (y'+y) = xz

Figure 3.3 Three-variable Map


A Three-variable Map
 m0 and m2 (m4 and m6) are adjacent
 m0+ m2 = x'y'z' + x'yz' = x'z' (y'+y) = x'z'
 m4+ m6 = xy'z' + xyz' = xz' (y'+y) = xz'
Example 3.1
 Example 3.1: simplify the Boolean function F(x, y, z) = (2, 3, 4, 5)
 F(x, y, z) = (2, 3, 4, 5) = x'y + xy'

Figure 3.4 Map for Example 3.1, F(x, y, z) = Σ(2, 3, 4, 5) = x'y + xy'
Example 3.2
 Example 3.2: simplify F(x, y, z) = (3, 4, 6, 7)
 F(x, y, z) = (3, 4, 6, 7) = yz+ xz'

Figure 3.5 Map for Example 3-2; F(x, y, z) = Σ(3, 4, 6, 7) = yz + xz'


Four adjacent Squares

Figure 3.3 Three-variable Map


Example 3.3
 Example 3.3: simplify F(x, y, z) = (0, 2, 4, 5, 6)
 F(x, y, z) = (0, 2, 4, 5, 6) = z'+ xy'

Figure 3.6 Map for Example 3-3, F(x, y, z) = Σ(0, 2, 4, 5, 6) = z' +xy'
Example 3.4
 Example 3.4: let F = A'C + A'B + AB'C + BC
a) Express it in sum of minterms.
b) Find the minimal sum of products expression.
Ans:
F(A, B, C)(1, 2, 3, 5, 7) = C + A'B

Figure 3.7 Map for Example 3.4, A'C + A'B + AB'C + BC = C + A'B
3.3 Four-Variable Map
 The map
 16 minterms
 Combinations of 2, 4, 8, and 16 adjacent squares

Figure 3.8 Four-variable Map


Example 3.5
 Example 3.5: simplify F(w, x, y, z) = (0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14)

F = y'+w'z'+xz'

Figure 3.9 Map for Example 3-5; F(w, x, y, z) = Σ(0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14) = y' + w' z' +xz'
Example 3.6
 Example 3-6: simplify F = ABC + BCD + ABCD + ABC

Figure 3.9 Map for Example 3-6; ABC + BCD +


ABCD + ABC= BD + BC +ACD
Prime Implicants
 Prime Implicants
 All the minterms are covered.
 Minimize the number of terms.
 A prime implicant: a product term obtained by combining the maximum possible
number of adjacent squares (combining all possible maximum numbers of squares).
 Essential P.I.: a minterm is covered by only one prime implicant.
 The essential P.I. must be included.
Prime Implicants
 Consider F(A, B, C, D) = Σ(0, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15)
 The simplified expression may not be unique
 F = BD+B'D'+CD+AD = BD+B'D'+CD+AB'
= BD+B'D'+B'C+AD = BD+B'D'+B'C+AB'

Figure 3.11 Simplification Using Prime Implicants


3.4 Five-Variable Map
 Map for more than four variables becomes complicated
 Five-variable map: two four-variable map (one on the top of the other).

Figure 3.12 Five-variable Map


Example 3.7
 Example 3.7: simplify F = (0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 13, 21, 23, 25, 29, 31)

F = A'B'E'+BD'E+ACE
3-5 Product of Sums Simplification
 Approach #1
 Simplified F' in the form of sum of products
 Apply DeMorgan's theorem F = (F')'
 F': sum of products → F: product of sums
 Approach #2: duality
 Combinations of maxterms (it was minterms)
 M0M1 = (A+B+C+D)(A+B+C+D') = (A+B+C)+(DD') = A+B+C
CD
AB 00 01 11 10
00 M0 M1 M3 M2
01 M4 M5 M7 M6
11 M12 M13 M15 M14
10 M8 M9 M11 M10
Example 3.8
 Example 3.8: simplify F = (0, 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 10) into (a) sum-of-products
form, and (b) product-of-sums form:

a) F(A, B, C, D)=(0, 1, 2, 5, 8,
9, 10) = B'D'+B'C'+A'C'D
b) F' = AB+CD+BD'
» Apply DeMorgan's theorem;
F=(A'+B')(C'+D')(B'+D)
» Or think in terms of maxterms

Figure 3.14 Map for Example 3.8, F(A, B, C, D)=(0,


1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 10) = B'D'+B'C'+A'C'D
Example 3.8 (cont.)
 Gate implementation of the function of Example 3.8

Sum-of products Product-of sums


form form
Figure 3.15 Gate Implementation of the Function of Example 3.8
Sum-of-Minterm Procedure
 Consider the function defined in Table 3.2.
 In sum-of-minterm:

F ( x, y , z )  (1,3, 4,6)
 In sum-of-maxterm:

F ( x, y , z ) (0, 2,5,7)
 Taking the complement of F

F ( x, y , z ) ( x  z )( x  z )
3-6 Don't-Care Conditions
 The value of a function is not specified for certain combinations of variables
 BCD; 1010-1111: don't care
 The don't-care conditions can be utilized in logic minimization
 Can be implemented as 0 or 1
 Example 3.9: simplify F(w, x, y, z) = (1, 3, 7, 11, 15) which has the don't-
care conditions d(w, x, y, z) = (0, 2, 5).
Example 3.9 (cont.)
 F = yz + w'x'; F = yz + w'z
 F = (0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 15) ; F = (1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 15)
 Either expression is acceptable

Figure 3.17 Example with don't-care Conditions


3-7 NAND and NOR Implementation
 NAND gate is a universal gate
 Can implement any digital system

Figure 3.18 Logic Operations with NAND Gates


NAND Gate
 Two graphic symbols for a NAND gate

Figure 3.19 Two Graphic Symbols for NAND Gate


Two-level Implementation
 Two-level logic
 NAND-NAND = sum of products
 Example: F = AB+CD
 F = ((AB)' (CD)' )' =AB+CD

Figure 3.20 Three ways to implement F = AB + CD


Example 3.10
 Example 3-10: implement F(x, y, z) =

F ( x, y , z )  (1, 2,3, 4,5,7) F ( x, y , z )  xy   xy  z

Figure 3.21 Solution to Example 3-10


NOR Implementation
 NOR function is the dual of NAND function.
 The NOR gate is also universal.

Figure 3.24 Logic Operation with NOR Gates


Two Graphic Symbols for a NOR Gate

Figure 3.25 Two Graphic Symbols for NOR Gate

Example: F = (A + B)(C + D)E

Figure 3.26 Implementing F = (A + B)(C + D)E


3-9 Exclusive-OR Function
 Exclusive-OR (XOR)
 xy = xy'+x'y
 Exclusive-NOR (XNOR)
 (xy)' = xy + x'y'
 Some identities
 x0 = x
 x1 = x'
 xx = 0
 xx' = 1
 xy' = (xy)'
 x'y = (xy)'
 Commutative and associative
 AB = BA
 (AB) C = A (BC) = ABC
Exclusive-OR Implementations
 Implementations
 (x'+y')x + (x'+y')y = xy'+x'y = xy

Figure 3.32 Exclusive-OR Implementations

You might also like