Practices and challenges of school
financial resource management
implementation in Bahir Dar City
administration of Ethiopia: A
comparative study between
government and private secondary
schools
INTRODUCTION
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
Overview DATA PRESENTATION
AND ANALYSIS
DISCUSSIONS AND
FINDINGS
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSION AND
IMPLICATION
Introduction:
1.Research Focus: The study effectively explains the importance of
financial resource management in schools and its implications for
education quality.
2.Comparative Approach: The distinction between government and
private schools provides a broader perspective on financial practices.
3.Justification of the Study: The authors highlight financial
mismanagement issues in schools, making a strong case for the
study.
4.Well-Structured Research Questions: The study presents
focused research questions that guide the investigation.
5.Limited discussion on global context: Comparative discussion on
financial management in other countries could add depth. 3
Research Methodology:
1.Mixed-methods Approach. It used descriptive surveys,
interviews, and document analysis.
2. Use Of Statistical Analysis. The research applies t-tests,
ANOVA, and post-hoc comparisons, strengthening the
credibility of quantitative findings.
3. Sampling Strategy. The study combines random and
purposive sampling, ensuring representative data
collection.
4. Ethical Considerations. The study follows ethical research
guidelines by ensuring anonymity and voluntary participation.
5. Sample Size Limitations. While 126 teachers participated,
the study does not indicate whether the sample is
representative of all secondary schools.
Data Presentation and Analysis:
1. Well-Structured Data Presentation: The study effectively
organizes data into tables, graphs, and statistical comparisons,
making it easy to interpret.
2. Use of Statistical Methods: Applying one-sample t-tests,
independent t-tests, ANOVA, and post-hoc analyses ensures rigorous
data analysis.
3. Comparative Insights: The study identifies key differences between
financial management practices in government and private schools.
4. Discussion of Findings: The study interprets results logically, linking
them to prior research and theoretical frameworks.
5. Transparency in Results: The article presents both strengths and
weaknesses of financial management in schools rather than focusing
solely on positive aspects.
5
Discussion and Interpretation of Findings:
1.Logical Analysis of Results: The discussion links
findings to the budget theory and financial control
theory, reinforcing the study’s theoretical framework.
2.Balanced Interpretation: The study acknowledges both
successes and challenges in financial management.
3.Comparison with Previous Research: The discussion
integrates prior studies, enhancing the reliability of
conclusions.
4.Lack of Concrete Recommendations: While challenges
are identified, the study does not provide a detailed action
plan for schools to improve financial transparency and
efficiency.
6
Conclusion and Implications:
1. Concise Summary of Key Findings: The
conclusion effectively restates the study’s main
discoveries.
2. Educational Outcomes: The study reinforces the
importance of financial resource
management in improving education quality.
3. Minimal Discussion on Funding Sources: While
financial management is analyzed, the study does
not explore alternative funding strategies.
7
Thank you
