CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
CASE STUDY: IPL SCAM
SUBJECT CODE : 21LEM101T
Group members –
Gokul ss – RA2311004010532
Priyank Srikanth – RA2311004010505
Logharaajan EV – RA2311004010504
Ronald Jain – RA2311004010527
Mohammad Nazal – RA2311004010526
Introduction to IPL:
The Indian Premier League (IPL) is a professional
Twenty20 cricket league in India, established in
2008 by the Board of Control for Cricket in India
(BCCI). Known for its high-octane matches, star-
studded lineups, and substantial financial
investments, the IPL quickly became a major
attraction for cricket fans worldwide, blending
entertainment with top-tier cricketing action.
OVERVIEW
The 2013 Indian Premier League spot-fixing and betting case arose when the Delhi
Police arrested three cricketers, Sreesanth, Ajit Chandila and Ankeet Chavan, on
the charges of alleged spot-fixing.
The three represented the Rajasthan Royals in the 2013 Indian Premier League.
In a separate case, Mumbai Police arrested Vindu Dara Singh, Priyank Sepany
(diamond dealer) and Chennai Super Kings Team Principal Gurunath Meiyappan for
alleged betting.
In July 2015, the RM Lodha Committee suspended India Cements and Jaipur IPL,
owners of Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals respectively, for two years.
Additionally, Sreesanth, Chandila and Chavan were cleared of all the charges after
they were found not guilty by the Patiala House Courts.
However, in January 2016, Chandila was given a life ban from all forms of cricket
by the BCCI.
In March 2019, the Supreme Court lifted the life ban imposed by BCCI on
Sreesanth.
Later in February 2023, the BCCI lifted the life ban imposed on Chandila.
KEY PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE
SCAM
The IPL scandal of 2013 involved several key parties:
1. Players: Some players were alleged to be involved in spot-fixing and
illegal betting activities.
2. Team owners: Some team owners were also implicated in the
scandal due to their alleged connections to illegal betting syndicates.
3. Bookies and fixers: These individuals were at the center of the scandal,
orchestrating illegal betting and fixing matches.
4. Cricket administrators: Certain cricket administrators were accused of
turning a blind eye to the corruption within the IPL.
5. Law enforcement agencies: Authorities such as the police were
involved in investigating and prosecuting those involved in the scandal.
6.Supreme Court on Friday set aside the BCCI Disciplinary Committee
order imposing a Life Ban on Former Indian Cricketer Sreesanth for his
alleged involvement in the 2013 IPL for spot fixing scandal.
WHAT MISTAKE DID THEY DO?
1. Lack of oversight: There was a lack of effective oversight and
regulation within the IPL, allowing for corruption to flourish.
2. Failure of player monitoring: The scandal highlighted a failure in
effectively monitoring players' activities and associations, making it
easier for them to engage in corrupt practices.
3. Inadequate security measures: Security measures within the IPL were
insufficient to prevent illegal activities such as spot-fixing and betting.
4. Ethical lapses: Some players and officials succumbed to ethical lapses,
compromising the integrity of the sport for personal gain.
5. Insufficient response: The initial response from cricket authorities and
IPL officials was criticized for being slow and inadequate in addressing the
scope of the scandal and implementing necessary reforms.
TIMELINE
1. May 2013: The scandal broke out during the
sixth season of the Indian Premier League (IPL)
when three cricketers, namely Sreesanth, Ajit
Chandila, and Ankeet Chavan, were arrested by
the Delhi Police for allegedly being involved in
spot-fixing matches.
2. May 2013: Following the arrests, the Board
of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) acted
swiftly and suspended all three players pending
an inquiry into the matter.
3. May 2013: The scandal widened when Gurunath Meiyappan, a top
official of the Chennai Super Kings franchise and son-in-law of then BCCI
president N. Srinivasan, was also arrested for alleged involvement in
betting on IPL matches.
4. May 2013: Rajasthan Royals' co-owner Raj Kundra was also
questioned by the Delhi Police in connection with the scandal.
5. July 2013: The BCCI formed a three-member panel, consisting of
former judges, to investigate the allegations against the players and
officials involved in the scandal.
6. July 2013: The Supreme Court of India appointed a separate
committee to look into the functioning of the IPL and allegations of
betting and spot-fixing.
7. July 2013: Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings were also
under scrutiny, leading to the suspension of both teams' owners from
participating in any cricket-related activities.
8. November 2013: The BCCI disciplinary committee found the three
players guilty of spot-fixing and handed them varying degrees of
punishment, including life bans for Sreesanth and Chavan.
9. July 2015: The Supreme Court-appointed Lodha Committee
recommended a two-year suspension for Chennai Super Kings and
Rajasthan Royals from participating in the IPL.
10. January 2016: The Supreme Court upheld the Lodha Committee's
recommendation, leading to the suspension of the two teams for two
seasons of the IPL.
NTRODUCTION
The INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE (IPL) Is a twenty
20 cricket competition.
Created by the BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET
IN INDIA ( BCCI) and the chairman and
commissioner of IPL .. LALIT MODI !
The commissioner LALIT MODI came up with the
idea of IPL.
DLF bagged exclusive rights For IPL title ownershiP
at 200 cr for 5 years
The first season of IPL started in 2008
But slowly its darker side appeared
IPL
–“honey its all about money “
LALIT MODI turned from IPL king to wanted fugitive.
People innovled in
the scam :
LALIT MODI ,
IPLCOMMISSION
ER
SHARAD PAWAR
SHASHI
THAROOR
WHAT DID THEY DO?
• Financial Irregularities: Allegations emerged that Lalit Modi was involved in bid rigging, manipulation of franchise
ownership bids, money laundering, and misappropriation of funds within the IPL. This included suspicions of
kickbacks, inflated broadcasting rights deals, and discrepancies in revenue sharing among franchise owners.
• Conflicts of Interest: Lalit Modi faced criticism for his dual roles within the IPL, serving both as its chairman and
commissioner while also having personal stakes in various IPL teams and related businesses. These overlapping
interests raised concerns about impartiality and potential favoritism in decision-making processes.
• Lack of Transparency: There were accusations of a lack of transparency in the IPL's operations under Lalit Modi's
leadership. Key decisions, such as team ownership transfers, broadcasting agreements, and sponsorship deals, were
allegedly made without sufficient oversight or disclosure, fostering suspicions of corruption.
• Breach of Regulatory Norms: Lalit Modi was accused of violating regulatory norms and governance standards in the
management of the IPL. This included allegations of tax evasion, non-compliance with financial regulations, and
failure to adhere to the guidelines set forth by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and other regulatory
bodies.
• Legal Challenges: Lalit Modi faced numerous legal challenges and investigations related to his conduct in the IPL.
Legal proceedings were initiated both domestically and internationally, with allegations ranging from financial
misconduct to fraud. These legal battles further escalated the controversy surrounding the IPL scam.
In summary, Lalit Modi was accused of engaging in various activities within the IPL that raised serious ethical and legal
concerns, including financial irregularities, conflicts of interest, lack of transparency, and breaches of regulatory norms.
These accusations formed the basis of the IPL scam allegations against him.
ARGUMENTS
• The case pertains to a criminal complaint filed by BCCI whichhas accused the former IPL
commissioner of misappropriatingfunds during his tenure.
• ED had earlier argued that the agency had been unable toexecute the non-bailable warrant
against Modi as he isresiding in UK.
• Modi had cheated the Board of Control for
• Cricket
• in India(BCCI) by getting ‘illegal gains’ from media
• rights
• as well asother deals that he entered in to with different companieswhile he was the IPL
chairman.
• ED said MODI was also part of
• "criminal conspiracy‘’
• financial Irregularities: One of the central allegations against Lalit Modi is that he was involved
in financial irregularities, including bid rigging, money laundering, and embezzlement of funds
within the IPL. These allegations point to a systemic problem in the financial management of
o JUDGEMENTS
o :
o Modi was removed from the BCCICommitte .
o He was no longer the IPL chairman .
o Rs 425 crores penalty had been slapedon modi .
o He was banned for life time for anyinnvolement in
cricketing matters .
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the IPL scams, particularly those associated with Lalit Modi's tenure, represent a
dark chapter in the history of the Indian Premier League. These scandals have exposed systemic
issues such as financial irregularities, conflicts of interest, lack of transparency, and governance
failures within the league.
The repercussions of these scandals extend beyond cricket, affecting the credibility of the IPL as
well as the broader reputation of Indian cricket. They have eroded the trust of fans, sponsors, and
stakeholders, tarnishing the image of one of the most popular and lucrative cricket leagues in the
world.
Moving forward, it is imperative for cricketing authorities, including the Board of Control for
Cricket in India (BCCI) and the IPL governing council, to implement robust reforms to address the
root causes of these scandals. This includes enhancing transparency, strengthening governance
mechanisms, enforcing strict financial regulations, and holding individuals accountable for their
actions.
Moreover, there needs to be a concerted effort to restore faith in the integrity of the IPL and
reaffirm its commitment to fair play, ethical conduct, and the spirit of the game. Only through
genuine reform and proactive measures can the IPL regain its credibility and uphold the values
that cricket fans around the world hold dear.
REFERENCES
• https://web.archive.org/web/20130608063158/http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cricketnext/will-take-
strictest-action-against-guilty-players-bcci-chief-n-sriniv/392015-78.html
• https://www.scribd.com/presentation/421481448/Ipl-Scam-Lalit-Modi-342#:~:text=Modi%20and
%20others.-,The%20Enforcement%20Directorate%20investigated%20and%20charged%20Modi
%20with%20illegally%20sending,role%20in%20the%20financial%20scandal
• https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/chronology-of-lalit-modis-rise-and-fall/
articleshow/47679599.cms
• http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/26274063/supreme-court-sets-aside-life-ban-sreesanth-
ipl-spot-fixing-case
• https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!
&&p=605f0501eba4df40JmltdHM9MTcxMDYzMzYwMCZpZ3VpZD0yMjg0MDM2Ny00NDZiLTZkO
DctMjc5YS0xMmI2NDU5YzZjMzYmaW5zaWQ9NTIwNw&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=3&fclid=22840367
-446b-6d87-279a-
12b6459c6c36&psq=link+for+chatgpt&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9jaGF0Lm9wZW5haS5jb20v&ntb=1
