0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views10 pages

Stats 2

The study investigates the impact of screen time on students' academic performance, finding a slight negative correlation between the two. Although increased screen time corresponds with a minor decrease in grades, the relationship is weak and not statistically significant. Consequently, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, indicating that screen time alone does not significantly predict academic performance.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views10 pages

Stats 2

The study investigates the impact of screen time on students' academic performance, finding a slight negative correlation between the two. Although increased screen time corresponds with a minor decrease in grades, the relationship is weak and not statistically significant. Consequently, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, indicating that screen time alone does not significantly predict academic performance.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

A S TU DY ON THE EFFECT OF

S C R E E N T I ME ON ACADEMI C
P E R FOR MANCE
B AC K G ROUND OF TH E
STUDY
In today's world, there ar e concer ns that students' use of
digital devices may have an im pact on their academ ic
achievement. Although lear ning t echnologies have lots of
advantages, excessive use of scr eens can also have negative
effects on one's per sonal health, including sleep depr ivat ion,
difficulty focusing, and par ticularly poor academ ic r esults.
However, with the right use, technology may im pr ove lear ning
through instructional tools and online r esour ces.
S I GNI FICANT
The signif icance of t his st udy on aver age and t ot al screen t ime
is t o det erm ine whet her screen t ime benef it s st udent s in t oday's
environment or has a det rim ent al impact on gener al
weight edaver age or gr ades. I t will det er mine if t her e's exist ing
correlat ions on scr een t im e t o aspect s such as f ocus, habit s of
st udy, and over all eff ect iveness of learning. Last ly, it will also
give par ent s and t eacher s valuable insight on which t o make
more inf or med decisions about t echnology usage in t he schools.
HYPOTHESI S
Null Hypothesis (Ho): There is Alternative Hypothesis (Ha):
no significant correlation There is a significant correlation
between students’ total screen between students’ total screen
time within a week and their
time within a week and their
academic performance.
academic performance.
I N TRODUCTI ON OF
VARI ABLES
Indepen den t va ria ble :
Scr een time of s tudents per week
Unit of m ea su rem e nt :
Hours

Depe nde nt va ria ble :


General av erage of s tudents , as their ac ademic
performanc e
Unit of m ea su rem e nt:
Scale of 1-100
DE S C RI PTI VE STATI S TI C S
Screen time per
week
Mean : 56.72
Median : 60
Mode : 70

Average in
Midterms
Mean : 91.48
Median : 92
Mode : 92
REL ATI ONSHI P BETWE E N
DATA
Computed value
usi ng Pearson-r : -
0.28

Interpretation :
S lightly Negative
Corelation
C ONCLUSI ON
T he c alc ulated Pe a r s o n ' s r o f - 0 .2 8 in d ic ates a s lightly
negativ e c or r elatio n b e tw e e n s tu d e n ts ' to tal s c r een time
w ithin a w eek an d th e ir g e n e r a l a v e r a g e gra des . This
s ugges ts a w eak in v e r s e r e la tio n s h ip , w h e r e an inc reas e in
s c re en time tends to c o r r e s p o n d w i th a s lig ht dec r eas e in
gr ades , and v ic e v e r s a . H o w e v e r, d u e to the c or r elation' s
pr ox imity to z er o , th e a s s o c ia ti o n b e tw e en thes e tw o
v ar iables is c ons id e r e d w e a k . T h is im p lie s that s c r een time
alone does not s ig n ific a n tl y p r e d ic t o r d e ter mine av er age
gr ades .
C ONCLUSI ON
T her efor e, w hile a tr en d e x is ts , it is n o t s tr o n g e nough to es tablis h
a s ubs tantial c onnec tio n . B a s e d o n th e c a l c u la te d Pea rs on' s r, the
nu ll hy p othes is ( H o) , w h ic h s ta te d th e r e is no s ignific ant
c o r r elation betw een s tu d e n ts ’ to ta l s c r e e n tim e w ithin a w eek a nd
their ac ademic per fo rm a n c e , c a n n o t b e r e je c te d . Th is means that
the data does not p r o v id e e n o u g h e v id e n c e to s uppo rt the
alter nativ e hy pothes is ( H a ) , w h ic h s ta te d th e r e is a s ignific ant
c o r r elation.
T H ANK YOU

You might also like