Gender Mainstreaming SW Lectures
Gender Mainstreaming SW Lectures
Mainstreaming
BY M. Munodawafa
Defining Gender Mainstreaming
Gender mainstreaming is a strategy and process to assess - through the use of a gender
analysis, which produces gender indicators and statistics - the implications of planned
policies and programmes.
It recognizes the need to make the different (social and economic) experiences of men and
women an integral dimension of the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of
these policies and programmes, to ensure fair results for women/girls and men/boys.
Importance of Gender
mainstreaming
A society’s well being depends on ensuring that all its members feel that they have a
stake in it and do not feel excluded from the mainstream.
Every individual and all peoples are entitled to participate in, contribute to and enjoy
civil, economic, social, cultural and political development in which all human rights and
fundamental freedoms can be fully realized.
This requires all groups, but particularly the most vulnerable, to have opportunities to
improve or maintain their well-being
Importance of Gender
Mainstreaming
Gender Mainstreaming:
is based on international human rights standards (CEDAW, Beijing Platform for Action,
SDGs) and directed to promoting and protecting these rights, whether in the social,
economic, political, civil or cultural spheres (or a combination of these).
has the ability to identify those most marginalized and excluded in society, as a result of
the gender system.
can enhance equitable development by empowering people and communities to take
their own decisions about what development means to them and how it will be achieved.
is particularly useful in development planning due to its potential to alleviate injustice,
inequality and poverty.
The goal is to achieve gender equality
Gender Mainstreaming strategy
Equality
The state or condition that affords women and men equal enjoyment of human rights, socially
valued goods, opportunities and resources, allowing both sexes the same opportunities and
potential to contribute to, and benefit from, all spheres of society (economic, political, social,
and cultural).
Gender equality means an equal visibility, empowerment and participation of both sexes in all
spheres of public and private life. Gender equality is the opposite of gender inequality, not of
gender difference, and aims to promote the full participation of women and men in society.
Gender Equity
justice and fairness in the treatment of women and men in order to eventually achieve gender
equality, often requesting differential treatment of women and men (or specific measures) in
order to compensate for the historical and social disadvantages that prevent women and men
from sharing a level playing field.
Empowerment
Empowerment is a multi-dimensional social process that helps people gain control over their own lives. It
is a process that fosters power (that is, the capacity to implement) in people, for use in their own lives,
their communities, and in their society, by acting on issues that they define as important.
It is easy to define empowerment by its absence but difficult to define in action as it takes on different
forms in different people and contexts. Even defining the concept is subject to debate. (Rappoport, 1984)
Empowerment is multi-dimensional, social, and a process.
It is multi-dimensional in that it occurs within sociological, psychological, economic, and other dimensions.
Empowerment also occurs at various levels, such as individual, group, and community.
Empowerment, by definition, is a social process, since it occurs in relationship to others.
Empowerment is a process that is similar to a path or journey, one that develops as we work through it.
Other aspects of empowerment may vary according to the specific context and people involved, but these
remain constant.
Gender roles
Gender roles are based on the different expectations that individuals, groups, and
societies have of individuals based on their sex and based on each society's values
and beliefs about gender.
Gender roles are the product of the interactions between individuals and their
environments, and they give individuals cues about what sort of behavior is
believed to be appropriate for what sex.
Appropriate gender roles are defined according to a society's beliefs about
differences between the sexes.
Gender Power Relations
Gender equality: The WID approach recognizes that gender equality is an essential
component of sustainable development and seeks to address the systemic inequalities
that disadvantage women and girls.
Empowerment of women: The WID approach seeks to empower women by promoting
their active participation in all aspects of development, including decision-making
processes, and by addressing the social, economic, and political barriers that limit their
agency.
Recognition of women’s rights: The WID approach advocates for the recognition and
protection of women’s rights, including their reproductive rights, their rights to education
and employment, and their rights to participate in public life.
Integration of a gender perspective: The WID approach emphasizes the importance
of integrating a gender perspective into all development policies and programs, in order
to ensure that the needs and priorities of both women and men are taken into account.
Capacity-building for women: The WID approach seeks to build the capacity of women
through education, training, and other forms of support, in order to enable them to fully
participate in development processes and to realize their full potential.
Successes of the WID Approach
Resistance to change: There has been resistance to the WID approach in some
quarters, particularly from those who view it as a threat to traditional gender
roles and power dynamics.
Limited resources: The WID approach has often been underfunded, which has
limited its ability to achieve its goals and to scale up successful initiatives.
Lack of gender-disaggregated data: There has often been a lack of accurate
and comprehensive data on the situation of women and girls, which has made it
difficult to measure the impact of the WID approach and to identify areas in need
of improvement.
Limited institutional support: There has often been a lack of institutional
support for the WID approach, both within governments and international
organizations, which has made it difficult to mainstream a gender perspective
into development policies and programs.
Women and Development Approach
(WAD)
The women and development (WAD) approach originated back in 1975 in Mexico city, as it
sought to discuss women’s issues from a neo-Marxist and dependency theory perspective.
WAD arose out of a shift in thinking about women's role in development
Its focus was to “explain the relationship between women and the process of capitalist
development in terms of material conditions that contribute to their exploitation”
WAD focuses specifically on the relation between patriarchy and capitalism.
The WAD perspective states that women have always participated and contributed towards
economic development, regardless of the public or private spheres.
The WAD approach suggests that there be women-only development projects that were
theorized to remove women from the patriarchal hegemony that would exist if women
participated in development alongside men in a patriarchal culture, though this concept has
been heavily debated by theorists in the field.
In this sense, WAD is differentiated from WID by way of the theoretical framework upon which it
was built. Rather than focus specifically on women's relationship to development, WAD focuses
on the relationship between patriarchy and capitalism.
WAD Approach continued….
The WAD paradigm stresses the relationship between women, and the work that they perform in their
societies as economic agents in both the public and domestic spheres.
It also emphasizes the distinctive nature of the roles women play in the maintenance and development
of their societies, with the understanding that purely the integration of women into development efforts
would serve to reinforce the existing structures of inequality present in societies overrun by patriarchal
interests.
In general, WAD is thought to offer a more critical conceptualization of women's position compared to
WID
The WAD approach emphasizes the distinctive nature of women's knowledge, work, goals, and
responsibilities, as well as advocating for the recognition of their distinctiveness.
This fact, combined with a recognized tendency for development agencies to be dominated by
patriarchal interests, is at the root of the women-only initiatives introduced by WAD subscribers
Challenges with WAD Approach
Some of the common critiques of the WAD approach include concerns that the women-only development
projects would struggle, or ultimately fail, due to their scale, and the marginalized status of these women.
Furthermore, the WAD perspective suffers from a tendency to view women as a class, and pay little
attention to the differences among women (such as feminist concept of intersectionality), including race
and ethnicity, and prescribe development endeavors that may only serve to address the needs of a
particular group.
While an improvement on WID, WAD fails to fully consider the relationships between patriarchy, modes of
production, and the marginalization of women.
It also presumes that the position of women around the world will improve when international conditions
become more equitable.
Additionally, WAD has been criticized for its singular preoccupation with the productive side of women's
work, while it ignores the reproductive aspect of women's work and lives.
Therefore, WID/WAD intervention strategies have tended to concentrate on the development of income-
generating activities without taking into account the time burdens that such strategies place on women.
Value is placed on income-generating activities, and none is ascribed to social and cultural reproduction. [2
Gender and Development Approach
(GAD)
The Gender and Development (GAD) approach focuses on the socially constructed
Differences between men and women, the need to challenge existing gender roles and relations and the creation and effects of class
differences on development
The approach was majorly influenced by the writings of academic scholars such as Oakley (1972) and Rubin (1975), who argue the social
relationship between men and women have systematically subordinated women
They state that colonialism imposed more than a 'value system' upon developing nations, it introduced a system of economics 'designed to
promote capital accumulation which caused class differentiation
GAD departs from WID, which discussed women's subordination and lack of inclusion in discussions of international development without
examining broader systems of gender relations
Some practitioners working in the development field questioned focusing on women in isolation
GAD challenged the WID focus on women as an important ‘target group and ‘untapped resources’ for development
GAD marked a shift in thinking about the need to understand how women and men are socially constructed and how ‘those constructions
are powerfully reinforced by the social activities that both define and are defined by them.’ [
GAD focuses primarily on the gendered division of labor and gender as a relation of power embedded in institutions. [
Consequently, two major frameworks, ‘Gender roles’ and ‘social relations analysis’, are used in this approach
Gender and Development
Approach continued….
Gender roles' focuses on the social construction of identities within the household; it also reveals
the expectations from ‘maleness and femaleness in their relative access to resources.
'Social relations analysis' exposes the social dimensions of hierarchical power relations
embedded in social institutions, as well as its determining influence on ‘the relative position of
men and women in society-this relative positioning tends to discriminate against women.
Unlike WID, the GAD approach is not concerned specifically with women, but with the way in
which a society assigns roles, responsibilities and expectations to both women and men.
GAD applies gender analysis to uncover the ways in which men and women work together,
presenting results in neutral terms of economics and efficiency
In an attempt to create gender equality (denoting women having the same opportunities as men,
including ability to participate in the public sphere),
GAD policies aim to redefine traditional gender role expectations.
Gender and Development
Approach
continued…
The GAD approach seeks to analyse the causes of gender inequality within the context of
relations between women and men and social structure, and to change stereotyped
division of labor as well as institutions and systems that bring about gender disparity.
The GAD approach emphasizes empowerment of women who are economically and
socially disadvantaged, while paying due consideration to the role of men in eliminating
gender inequality.
Since the "Fourth World Conference on Women" held in 1995, the international community
has attached importance to "gender mainstreaming" as a way of firmly establishing the
GAD approach.
GAD Principles and Approaches
What women or men require in order to improve their position or status in regard to each other by placing them in
greater control of themselves instead of limiting them to the restrictions imposed by socially defined roles/
Strategic needs are the needs required to overcome the subordinate position of women to men in society, and relate
to the empowerment of women. These also could include:
Improved skills in negotiating productive and reproductive issues with husband or boyfriends, including safe sex;
Challenging cultural stereotypes unfair to women such as: females regarded as inferior and subordinate to males;
females blamed for male promiscuity—woman as temptress to innocent man; male promiscuity widely tolerated,
female promiscuity widely condemned;
The strategic gender needs should be understood from the lens of women’s status in the society. The policies and
programmes that promote inheritance to property and equality in political participation (in the highest forums) could
be seen as a few examples.
They are long-term (i.e. they aim to improve positions); they also intend to remove restrictions, and are less visible
as they seek to change attitudes.
Examples of addressing SGNs include actions such as giving rights to land, inheritance, credit and financial services;
increasing participation of women in decision-making; creating equal opportunities to employment (equal pay for
equal work); and improving social systems.
SGNs continued…..
In-laws blaming wives for family problems; double standards about leisure time—OK for men to
spent lots of time drinking, socializing etc. but not women.
Redefining female and male roles such as females as servants; females as housekeepers;
females as child-rearers;
Females as main nurturers and carers in household and community— encouraging men to
engage in formerly-defined female roles to broaden their development, and encouraging women
to engage in formerly defined male roles to broaden their development;
Challenging social, economic and legal status and power of females and males in areas such as:
unequal inheritance rights or customs;
Imbalance in decision-making making power at all levels; discrimination against women in labor
markets;
Promoting women’s participation in primary, secondary, tertiary education and vocational
training, among other things, to increase their access to formal public-sector and private-sector
labor market (wage-labor sectors as distinct from petty-trading and peasant farming).
Gender Mainstreaming Process
A limitation of this framework is that it looks at the women’s side of inequality, and
does not address the gender roles of men.
The Women’s Empowerment Framework is not designed to explain how or why a
program works, exploring the contributing or causal factors that led to the
progression from one level of impact to the next.
Focus is only placed on three levels of equality, e.g., positive, neutral, or negative
impact, which limits important qualitative assessments of “success” that provide
valuable information critical for program improvement.
The assumption that there is a hierarchy of gender equality levels suggests a
somewhat more linear change trajectory than is often found in practice.
Principles of Gender Mainstreaming
Gender-sensitive language
Services and products must be assessed as to their different effects on women and
men.
It is important to identify:
Who uses the services (women or men or both)?
Who are the clients (women or men or both)?
Who are the target groups?
Do women and men have different needs?
Are the different circumstances of women and men taken into account when planning
and designing services?
Have all target groups access to the same sources of information?
Who benefits most?
Which group would suffer most if they could not use the services offered?
Women and Men Equally Involved
in Decision Making
There are binding targets for a balanced gender ratio at all levels of
decision making
Measures and strategies geared towards a balanced gender ratio
must be taken at all levels of decision making.
Important when appointing working groups, project teams,
commissions and advisory boards as well as when organising events
e.g. selecting speakers
Workplaces must be structurally gendered and barrier free where
possible e.g. gendered signage, sufficient lighting avoiding
potentially frightening situations as in poorly accessible places
Equal Treatment is Integrated into Steering
Processes
Khanal, D. (2015) Gender and its Relation to Community Development and in Context in Nepal
Elements of Community
Involvement
Full community participation
Bottom-up development approach
Addressing the real needs of the community
Initiated by the community
Planned by the community
Executed and driven by the community
Accommodating local knowledge, cultures, norms and values
In interaction with the capacity of the social environment
Timeously execute
References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_and_development#Gender_and_developme
nt_(GAD)
Lips, H. (1991). Women, men and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfeld.
Lukes, S. (1994). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Miller, J.B. (1976).Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.
Nicola-McLaughlin, A., & Chandler, Z. (1984; 180-201). Urban politics in the
higher education of black women: A case study. In Bookmen & Morgen (Eds.).
Women and the politics of empowerment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Rapport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prevention
in Human Services, 3, 1-7.
Schutte, De Wet. (2016). COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATION: A CONCEPTUAL REVISIT. 10.13140/RG.2.2.22723.81443.
Abuiyada, R. (2018). Traditional Development to Theories have failed the Needs
of the Majority of People and Grassroots Level with Reference to GAD, Dhofar
References
https://www.turnthebus.org/blog/practical-gender-needs-and-strategic-gender-needs-g
reen-jobs-for-women-and-girls
https://www.worldvision.com.au/docs/default-source/publications/health/learning-from-
the-past-hope-for-the-future
Badola, R., and Hussain, S. A. (2003). Conflict in Paradise: Women and Protected Areas
in the Indian Himalayas. Mountain Research and Development, 23(3), 234-237.
UNIFEM, 1995:7. Conclusions of the Conference on “Equality and democracy: Utopia or
challenge?”, Council of Europe, 1995. Final Report of the Group of Specialists on
Equality and Democracy, Council of Europe, 1996
Huisinga Norem, R., R. Yoder and Y. Martin, (2001). “Indigenous Agricultural
Knowledge and Gender Issues in Third World Agricultural Development”, cited in Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Socioeconomic and Gender
Analysis Programme – Intermediate Level Handbook. FAO, Rome: 21.
https://www.soencouragement.org
References
http://awidme.pbworks.com/w/page/36322701/Women's%20Empowerment%20Framework
https://youtu.be/RgvkBGnzeiE
http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/gendermainstreaming.htm
Blackstone, A. (2003). Gender Roles and Society
Khan T. (2019) Gender Power Relations in the Medical Profession. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A., Brandli L.,
Özuyar P., Wall T. (eds) Gender Equality. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70060-1_54-1
http://www.ekvilib.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/06/01_Gender_Concepts.pdf
https://eugender.itcilo.org/toolkit/online/story_content/external_files/BB6.pdf
Moser, C., 1993, Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training, Routledge,
London.
Overholt, Anderson, Austin, and Cloud, 1985, Gender Roles in Development Projects. Kumarian Press
Inc, Connecticut.
Longwe, S.H., 1991, Gender awareness: the missing element in the Third World development project,
in: Changing Perceptions: writings on gender and development, Wallace T., and March C., eds.
Oxford: Oxfam.
References
Bailey, D. (1992). Using participatory research in community consortia development and evaluation: lessons from
the beginning of a story. American Sociologist, 23 (4), 71-82.
Bookman, A., & Morgen, S. (Eds.). (1984). Women and the politics of empowerment. Philadelphia: Temple University
Press.
Chavis, D., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and
community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18 (1), 55-81.
Florin, P., & Wandersman, A. (1990).An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community
development: insights for empowerment through research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 41-
54.
Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Translated by M.B. Ramos. New York: Seabury Press.
Horton, A. (1989). The Highlander Folk School: A history of its major programs. Brooklyn, NY: Carlson Publishers.
Korten, D.E. (1987). Community management. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. Albany, NY: State University of
New York Press.
Lappe, F.M., & Dubois, P.M. (1994). The quickening of America: Rebuilding our nation, remaking our lives. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass,Inc. Publishers.
https//www.wien.gv.at/english/administration/gendermainstreaming/principles/five-principles.html
The end, thank you!