Final report - Div
- 1. Title: Neutrophil killing: NETs versus phagosomes Student: Divyansh Panesar Supervisor(s): Dr. Heather Parker, Professor Anthony Kettle Sponsor: Oxygen Theme Background Microorganisms such as fungi or bacteria can invade through the body’s physical barriers (skin/mucous membranes). Upon doing so, the chemicals secreted atthe site of infection by both hostand invader cells attract a great number of white blood cells – mainly neutrophils. Neutrophils are generally the first white blood cells that act to defend us. Their primary method of killing involves getting into contact with the invading microorganism and quite literally, ingesting it. This process is known as phagocytosis and when microbes are phagocytosed, they are subjected to an array of toxic proteins and chemicals that can kill them. One such protein is myeloperoxidase (MPO) which converts hydrogen peroxide in the cell to hypochlorous acid, or household bleach. Hypochlorous acid is highly reactive and has an effective bacteria-killing action. Neutrophil elastase is another protein that has the ability to kill bacteria by degrading bacterial proteins. For roughly a century it was believed that beyond phagocytosis and the release of toxic chemicals, there was no other significant method of antimicrobial action demonstrated by neutrophils. However, ten years ago a new neutrophil action was discovered – the generation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs). NETs are formed out of DNA and associated proteins in a cell. During NET formation, this DNA unwinds from a coiled arrangement, mixes with antimicrobial proteins in the cell and is released into the space outside the cell where it is randomly arranged into a configuration that looks a lotlike a spider’s web. NETs are able to trap microorganisms in their meshwork and the MPO protein on NETs has been shown to kill the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. It is believed thatthe role ofNETs is to capture microorganisms, preventing their spread within the host and possibly to kill these organisms as well. Previous studies in my host laboratory have demonstrated that on their own, NETs are not able to kill the bacterial species Staphylococcus aureus and the aim ofthis projectwas to see if such was the case with P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa is a particularly unpleasant bacterium found in almost all patients with cystic fibrosis, a disease causing increased thickness and stickiness of airways secretions, and is highly resistant to synthetic antibacterial agents. S. aureus is similarly found in cystic fibrosis patients and it’s also found on the skin and respiratory tracts of healthy individuals. The multi-drug resistant form of S. aureus is a significant problem worldwide. Both bacteria are also found in the environment and on hospital equipment and when a person’s immune system becomes compromised, they both have the ability to become harmful. Aim and Method The aim of this project was to determine if NETs are capable of killing the bacterium P. aeruginosa. In the initial stages of the project I did a series of experiments to determine the best method and techniques to work with P. aeruginosa. Neutrophils were isolated from the blood of healthy donors recruited from within the laboratory. During the project, NETs were generated via the addition ofa chemical called PMA - phorbol myristate acetate and then incubated with bacteria. After incubating the bacteria with the pre-formed NETs for an hour, the number of living bacteria was
- 2. determined using a standard microbiological assay. This assay involves diluting the bacteria and plating them onto a petri dish containing a nutrient-rich medium known as blood agar. After incubating the bacteria on the agar overnight I then counted how many bacterial colonies were seen. To determine if NETs killed P. aeruginosa, the number of colonies counted in samples that were incubated with NETs was compared with those where the bacteria were incubated without NETs. Results I was able to demonstrate that there were fewer bacterial colonies, approximately 58% less, on the agar plates that corresponded to the samples with both NETs and bacteria together. This meant that NETs had the potential to kill a significant amount of P. aeruginosa on their own. Further into the project I was able to show that inhibiting the neutrophil elastase enzyme on NETs did not alter their killing potential and neither did the addition of hydrogen peroxide - which NET-MPO uses to make bleach. I also examined if P. aeruginosa, by itself, could generate NETs. After incubating P. aeruginosa for a period of 4 hours with neutrophils, I was indeed able to see the presence ofNETs. This has also been observed with S. aureus. Conclusions It appears that NETs can kill the bacterium P. aeruginosa but the exact components required for this to occur are not yetknown. However, neutrophil elastase is notrequired. In the case of S. aureus, previous studies have shown that NET-MPO turns hydrogen peroxide into bleach and this is able to kill the bacteria trapped on the NETs. It seems that such may not be the case for P. aeruginosa as addition of hydrogen peroxide did not increase killing of this bacterium. Further study is required to determine just how NETs kill P. aeruginosa.