AGI geocommunity 2013
1 like2,231 views
The document discusses the evolution and significance of open-source geospatial software, emphasizing its impact on the geospatial community and market. It highlights the extensive collaborative development within open-source projects and the cost-saving benefits for consumers. Moreover, it outlines the importance of open data and crowdsourcing in contemporary geospatial analysis and applications.
AGI geocommunity 2013
- 2. State of the Map AGI GeoCommunity FOSS4G 2
- 3. 3
- 4. 4
- 6. OPEN AS IN ACCESSIBLE 6
- 7. ïŹic.kr/p/7rnNAD ïŹic.kr/p/7NEJzF Location is now Pervasive and Simple in consumer applications 7
- 8. 8
- 9. DISRUPTIVETECHNOLOGY Functionality / performance Time Established technology Disruptive technology Mainstream Market requirements 9
- 12. âspatial is specialâ âspatial is just another data typeâ 12
- 13. THE GEOSPATIAL MARKET Traditional GIS Total market Google Apple Amazon Facebook Twitter Microsoft Oracle Nokia OSGeo Mapbox CartoDB Boundless Ubisense Arc2Earth Astun Stamen and many more 13
- 14. OPEN SOURCE 14
- 15. OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE Open-source software (OSS) is computer software with its source code made available and licensed with a license in which the copyright holder provides the rights to study, change and distribute the software to anyone and for any purpose. Open-source software is very often developed in a public, collaborative manner. A report by the Standish Group (from 2008) states that adoption of open-source software models has resulted in savings of about $60Â billion per year to consumers. 15
- 16. Created to support and build the highest-quality open source geospatial software. Our goal is to encourage the use and collaborative development of community-led projects OSGeo also serves as an outreach and advocacy organization for the open source geospatial community, and provides a common forum and shared infrastructure for improving cross-project collaboration. Open Source Geospatial Foundation 16
- 18. Web Mapping deegree geomajas GeoMoose GeoServer Mapbender MapBuilder MapFish MapGuide Open Source MapServer OpenLayers Team Engine ZOO-Project Desktop Applications GRASS GIS gvSIG Marble Opticks Quantum GIS Geospatial Libraries FDO GDAL/OGR GEOS GeoTools MetaCRS OSSIM PostGIS rasdaman Metadata Catalog GeoNetwork pycsw Outreach Projects Public Geospatial Data Education and Curriculum OSGeo Live Italics signify projects in incubation Software projects 27 18
- 19. Project Name Annual Contributors Total Contributors Lines of Code Mapbender Community MapBuilder MapGuide Open Source MapServer OpenLayers GRASS GIS OSSIM Quantum GIS GDAL GeoTools GeoNetwork opensource Feature Data Objects (FDO) GEOS gvSIG Desktop deegree PostGIS Geomajas GeoServer MapFish 20 54 1,360,815 1 25 166,028 7 47 515,899 35 68 230,299 51 76 118,043 18 69 1,285,664 7 26 1,076,078 78 116 655,451 23 46 901,142 60 132 3,205,814 27 40 2,345,603 10 36 1,551,951 3 17 143,088 7 19 1,376,314 8 25 982,165 10 23 282,844 10 19 417,228 64 86 700,006 1 17 154,625 Total 440 941 17,469,057 OSGeo Project Details March 2013 17.5 million lines of code 440annual contributors all time contributors 941 19
- 21. 21
- 22. 22
- 23. Developing open source software is not a hobby (for most people) 23
- 24. The Web Mapping Shootout Denver 2011 24
- 25. 25
- 26. Functionality Cost Support Terms PredictabilityFlexibility 26
- 27. Photo by adesigna - http://ïŹic.kr/p/7eukcs Functionality 27
- 29. Photo by ecstaticist - http://ïŹic.kr/p/6fx7Ln Support 29
- 30. Flexibility 30
- 31. Photo by Steve Punter - http://ïŹic.kr/p/5qXFV9 Terms 31
- 32. Photo by Jonathan Caves - http://ïŹic.kr/p/59T6cp Predictability 32
- 33. How do I learn more? 33
- 34. 34
- 38. cartodb.com 38
- 39. mapbox.com 39
- 40. mapnik.com 40
- 41. D3 - d3js.org 41
- 42. Thereâs a parallel geo-world out there! http://ïŹic.kr/p/bqW9yE 42
- 43. OPEN DATA 43
- 44. Cost of data barrier to entry has been a traditional http://ïŹic.kr/p/5Xb1fD 44
- 47. 47
- 48. 48
- 50. 50
- 51. 51
- 52. 52
- 53. 53
- 54. 54
- 57. WIKIPEDIA 57
- 58. OpenStreetMap 58
- 59. 59
- 60. What about quality? âOSM quality is beyond good enough, it is a product that can be used for a wide range of activitiesâ Dr Muki Haklay of UCL Based on a detailed analysis http://tinyurl.com/mukiosm 60
- 61. 61
- 62. 62
- 63. 63
- 64. 64
- 65. 65
- 66. 66
- 67. 67
- 68. Google MapMaker! Geoweb 2009 Michael Jones, Google âThe future is user created dataâ 68
- 70. 2007 data Database 69 countries 11m miles (18m km) of roads 18m points of interest People Field force 700 Central production 270 Technology 500 Total 3349 Financial Revenue $853m (~âŹ604m) Data creation & distribution costs $396m(~âŹ280m) âCreating, maintaining and delivering a comprehensive, high quality map database is a multi-step, labor-intensive process.We currently employ over 270 employees in our centralized production facility and a global workforce of over 700 geographic analysts in 32 countriesâ 70
- 71. Crowdsourcing is a paradigm shift for data creation ïŹickr.com/photos/jamescridland/613445810/ 71
- 72. Though âfree dataâ is not a panacea ... Google âpeter batty georantâ 72
- 73. Everyone s favorite punchbag! O most pernicious woman! O villain, villain, smiling, damned villain! ! Hamlet! A portion of this slide is! © Crown copyright 2006! 73
- 74. How the devil Luxury, with his fat rump and potato ïŹnger, tickles these together! Fry, lechery, fry!! Thersites,Troilus and Cressida! 74
- 75. Though âfree dataâ is not a panacea ... Google âpeter batty georantâ 75
- 77. 9 17 29 33 46 57 63 67 94 93 99 112 123 136 137 154 162 182 191 210 225 238 254 265 278 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 1.4.7 FME 2.0 FME 2.1 FME 2.2 FME 2.3 FME 2.3a FME 2000 FME 2000 SR-1 FME 2002 FME 2002 SR-1 FME 2003 FME 2003 X2 FME 2004 FME 2004 ICE FME 2004 ICE3 FME 2005 FME 2006 FME 2006 GB FME 2007 FME 2008 FME 2009 FME 2010 Beta UC Cut FME 2010 FME 2011 FME 2012 NUMBER OF DATA FORMATS SUPPORTED BY FME OVERTIME Chart courtesy of Safe Software 77
- 78. Itâs hard to predict what will become adopted as a standard 78
- 79. 79
- 80. WMS â Web Map Service V1.0 from 2000, V1.3 from 2004 80
- 81. 81
- 82. 82
- 83. 83
- 84. 84
- 85. 78%of statistics are made up 85
- 86. 85% of data has a spatial component 86
- 87. 87
- 88. 88
- 89. <entry> <title>M 3.2, Mona Passage</title> <link href="http://example.org/2005/09/09/atom01"/> <id>urn:uuid:1225c695-cfb8-4ebb-aaaa-80da344efa6a</id> <updated>2005-08-17T07:02:32Z</updated> <summary>We just had a big one.</summary> <georss:point>45.256 -71.92</georss:point> </entry> is childâs play geoRSS 89
- 90. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <kml xmlns="http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2"> <Placemark> <name>Simple placemark</name> <description>Attached to the ground. Intelligently places itself at the height of the underlying terrain.</description> <Point> <coordinates>-122.0822035425683,37.42228990140251,0</coordinates> </Point> </Placemark> </kml> KML is simple too (basic) 90
- 91. Web Services Photo by MrWoodnz - http://ïŹic.kr/p/6WB4N1 91
- 92. SOAP âŠand WSDLWeb Services Description LanguageSimple Object Access Protocol 92
- 93. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl" xmlns:tns="http://www.tmsws.com/wsdl20sample" xmlns:whttp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/" xmlns:wsoap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" targetNamespace="http://www.tmsws.com/wsdl20sample"> <!-- Abstract type --> <types> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://www.tmsws.com/wsdl20sample" targetNamespace="http://www.example.com/wsdl20sample"> <xs:element name="request"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="header" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:string"> <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:string" use="required"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name="body" type="xs:anyType" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="method" type="xs:string" use="required"/> <xs:attribute name="uri" type="xs:anyURI" use="required"/> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name="response"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="header" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xs:string"> <xs:attribute name="name" use="required"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name="body" type="xs:anyType" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:sequence> <xs:attribute name="status-code" type="xs:anySimpleType" use="required"/ > <xs:attribute name="response-phrase" use="required"/> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xs:schema> </types> <!-- Concrete Binding Over HTTP --> <binding name="RESTfulInterfaceHttpBinding" interface="tns:RESTfulInterface" type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http"> <operation ref="tns:Get" whttp:method="GET"/> <operation ref="tns:Post" whttp:method="POST" whttp:inputSerialization="application/x-www-form-urlencoded"/> <operation ref="tns:Put" whttp:method="PUT" whttp:inputSerialization="application/x-www-form-urlencoded"/> <operation ref="tns:Delete" whttp:method="DELETE"/> </binding> <!-- Concrete Binding with SOAP--> <binding name="RESTfulInterfaceSoapBinding" interface="tns:RESTfulInterface" type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap" wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/" wsoap:mepDefault="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request- response"> <operation ref="tns:Get" /> <operation ref="tns:Post" /> <operation ref="tns:Put" /> <operation ref="tns:Delete" /> </binding> <!-- Web Service offering endpoints for both bindings--> <service name="RESTfulService" interface="tns:RESTfulInterface"> <endpoint name="RESTfulServiceHttpEndpoint" binding="tns:RESTfulInterfaceHttpBinding" address="http://www.example.com/rest/"/> <endpoint name="RESTfulServiceSoapEndpoint" binding="tns:RESTfulInterfaceSoapBinding" address="http://www.example.com/soap/"/> </service> </description> Example WSDL code 93
- 94. REST Jason Birch City of Nanaimo Representational State Transfer 94
- 98. 98
- 99. 99
- 100. âIf a dataset available on the web is in a format that can't be indexed by Google, does it make a sound?â Kevin Wiebe Safe Software 100
- 101. REST beneïŹts Simplicity Linkability Searchability Simple update (using PUT and POST) Photo by ebatty - http://ïŹic.kr/p/2f3BUQ 101
- 102. SUMMARY 102
- 103. Thereâs a parallel geo-world out there! http://ïŹic.kr/p/bqW9yE 103
- 104. The geo world we know is part of a much larger universe now 104
- 105. [email protected] geothought.blogspot.com @pmbatty slideshare.net/pmbatty/presentations This is the most exciting time ever to be working in the geospatial industry 105