Improvement of reading
comprehension through computer-
assisted language learning in
Iranian intermediate EFL students
Presenter: Jane Luo
Advisor: Dr. Teresa Hsu
Date:103/12/15 1
Citation
Marzban, A. (2011). Improvement of
reading comprehension through computer-
assisted language learning in Iranian
intermediate EFL students. Procedia-
Computer Science, 3, 3-10.
2
Contents 1 • Introduction
2 • Literature Review
3 • Method
4 • Discussion & Conclusion
5 • Reflection
3
Definition of Terms
CALL:
Computer-Assisted Language Learning
ICT:
Information and Communications Technology
4
Introduction
 Purpose of the study
 Research Questions
 Research Hypothesis
5
Purpose of the study
To investigated the effect of ICT and
more specifically CALL on the quality of
students’reading comprehension in an
Iranian academic setting.
6
Advantage of ICT in EFL
enhance the teaching of EFL learners
enhance EFL pupils’ English language
and curriculum learning
7
enhance the teaching of EFL learners by
providing:
access to EFL pedagogy and expertise
access to culturally and linguistically diverse
resources
access to innovative tools to integrate language and
curriculum learning
8
enhance EFL pupils’ English language and
curriculum learning by:
providing opportunities to access information in
different and helpful forms
9
creating opportunities for learners to refine,
develop and store their language output
creating a focus on English and how it is used
10
enhance EFL pupils’ English language and
curriculum learning by:
increasing opportunities to use first language to
support curriculum and English learning
providing opportunities for learners to become
autonomous learners and to practise their skills
in particular areas of English
enhance EFL pupils’ English language and
curriculum learning by:
11
increasing opportunities and motivation to
communicate in English
stimulating working, thinking and talking
collaboratively which supports EFL learners to
process and embed language and curriculum
Barriers to the Application of ICT
Problem in infrastructures
Lack of training
Weak technical support
12
Research Questions
1. Does the use of Computer Assisted
Language Learning(CALL) have any impact
on the reading comprehension of Iranian
intermediate EFL learners?
2. Is there any significant difference between
the mean scores of the group taught using
CALL-based methods and the group taught
using traditional methods? 13
Research Hypothesis
There is no significant difference between
the means scores of the groups instructed
with CALL systems and the control group
instructed with traditional systems at the
level of P<0.05.
14
Literature Review
ICT on Iran
CALL
15
ICT on Iran
“investigated ICT use among faculty
members of the Iranian institute of
industrial and scientific research and
found that email was the most frequently
used from of ICT use and that university
degree and field of study were correlated
with the amount of use”
(Ghamsari, 1999)16
CALL
Behaviourist CALL
Communicative CALL
Integrative CALL
The development of CALL into three distinct
phases:
(Warschauer, 1996)17
Method Participants
Instruments
Procedure
Research Design
Data Analysis & Results 18
Participants
Total 85 students in Iranian
Background
from middle and upper class
families
The degree of English intermediate level
19
Instruments
The proficiency tests :
published by Cambridge; developed by
Michigan University Press
Computer Laboratory:
contain 15computers
20
Instruments
Computer Hardware:
PCs with graphic, sound cards, speaker,
and microphones
Computer Software:
Windows 98, SPSS 12, and package of
“TELL ME MORE Software
21
ProcedureEnsure that the students had the same
level of skill in English
only 85 people have the required level
of language skill and fulfil the
purpose of the study
Divided into two experimental groups
and two control groups 22
Research Design
 pre-test/pos-test experimental Solomon design
Group Experimenta
lGroup
Control
Group
Approach Software for
reading
section
Tradition
reading
instruction
23
Data Analysis & Results
24
Discussion & Conclusion
 the students who were taught by CALL
instructional techniques significantly
outperformed the students who were
taught by the traditional teacher-centred
methods of teaching reading
comprehension
25
Discussion & Conclusion
 provides the technical and logistic
support for the fulfilment of theoretical
tenets of communicative approach which
emphasizes a more humanistic and
individualistic learning and which
accounts for different cognitive, affective,
biological, and socio-cultural variables
among the learners. 26
Reflection
27
Let the class get more interesting.
For students
Get more the motivation of learning.
For teachers
Thank you!
28

10322611 Jane

  • 1.
    Improvement of reading comprehensionthrough computer- assisted language learning in Iranian intermediate EFL students Presenter: Jane Luo Advisor: Dr. Teresa Hsu Date:103/12/15 1
  • 2.
    Citation Marzban, A. (2011).Improvement of reading comprehension through computer- assisted language learning in Iranian intermediate EFL students. Procedia- Computer Science, 3, 3-10. 2
  • 3.
    Contents 1 •Introduction 2 • Literature Review 3 • Method 4 • Discussion & Conclusion 5 • Reflection 3
  • 4.
    Definition of Terms CALL: Computer-AssistedLanguage Learning ICT: Information and Communications Technology 4
  • 5.
    Introduction  Purpose ofthe study  Research Questions  Research Hypothesis 5
  • 6.
    Purpose of thestudy To investigated the effect of ICT and more specifically CALL on the quality of students’reading comprehension in an Iranian academic setting. 6
  • 7.
    Advantage of ICTin EFL enhance the teaching of EFL learners enhance EFL pupils’ English language and curriculum learning 7
  • 8.
    enhance the teachingof EFL learners by providing: access to EFL pedagogy and expertise access to culturally and linguistically diverse resources access to innovative tools to integrate language and curriculum learning 8
  • 9.
    enhance EFL pupils’English language and curriculum learning by: providing opportunities to access information in different and helpful forms 9 creating opportunities for learners to refine, develop and store their language output creating a focus on English and how it is used
  • 10.
    10 enhance EFL pupils’English language and curriculum learning by: increasing opportunities to use first language to support curriculum and English learning providing opportunities for learners to become autonomous learners and to practise their skills in particular areas of English
  • 11.
    enhance EFL pupils’English language and curriculum learning by: 11 increasing opportunities and motivation to communicate in English stimulating working, thinking and talking collaboratively which supports EFL learners to process and embed language and curriculum
  • 12.
    Barriers to theApplication of ICT Problem in infrastructures Lack of training Weak technical support 12
  • 13.
    Research Questions 1. Doesthe use of Computer Assisted Language Learning(CALL) have any impact on the reading comprehension of Iranian intermediate EFL learners? 2. Is there any significant difference between the mean scores of the group taught using CALL-based methods and the group taught using traditional methods? 13
  • 14.
    Research Hypothesis There isno significant difference between the means scores of the groups instructed with CALL systems and the control group instructed with traditional systems at the level of P<0.05. 14
  • 15.
  • 16.
    ICT on Iran “investigatedICT use among faculty members of the Iranian institute of industrial and scientific research and found that email was the most frequently used from of ICT use and that university degree and field of study were correlated with the amount of use” (Ghamsari, 1999)16
  • 17.
    CALL Behaviourist CALL Communicative CALL IntegrativeCALL The development of CALL into three distinct phases: (Warschauer, 1996)17
  • 18.
  • 19.
    Participants Total 85 studentsin Iranian Background from middle and upper class families The degree of English intermediate level 19
  • 20.
    Instruments The proficiency tests: published by Cambridge; developed by Michigan University Press Computer Laboratory: contain 15computers 20
  • 21.
    Instruments Computer Hardware: PCs withgraphic, sound cards, speaker, and microphones Computer Software: Windows 98, SPSS 12, and package of “TELL ME MORE Software 21
  • 22.
    ProcedureEnsure that thestudents had the same level of skill in English only 85 people have the required level of language skill and fulfil the purpose of the study Divided into two experimental groups and two control groups 22
  • 23.
    Research Design  pre-test/pos-testexperimental Solomon design Group Experimenta lGroup Control Group Approach Software for reading section Tradition reading instruction 23
  • 24.
    Data Analysis &Results 24
  • 25.
    Discussion & Conclusion the students who were taught by CALL instructional techniques significantly outperformed the students who were taught by the traditional teacher-centred methods of teaching reading comprehension 25
  • 26.
    Discussion & Conclusion provides the technical and logistic support for the fulfilment of theoretical tenets of communicative approach which emphasizes a more humanistic and individualistic learning and which accounts for different cognitive, affective, biological, and socio-cultural variables among the learners. 26
  • 27.
    Reflection 27 Let the classget more interesting. For students Get more the motivation of learning. For teachers
  • 28.