@ Future Internet Assembly conf., Ghent 2010-12-14 ” Future Internet Research and Experimentation By Adopting Living Labs – towards Smart Cities ”Living Labs and Smart Cities: Open innovation for the Future Internet – Session: Towards Future Internet: what can it mean for Living Labs and Smart CitiesModerator:Michael Nilsson, CDTProject Coordinator FIREBALL
Session objectives.To reflect on “Smart Cities” as centres for user driven open innovation, using Future Internet technology in a user-friendly way to enable a truly knowledge-based society. New technologies can be used in developing new public services.  Through the usage of Living Labs methodologies in the city, successful concepts can be identified, and user co-creation can enhance the innovation process, resulting in successful and sustainable services.
Speakers & Panellists:• Piet Demeester, IBBT Margarete Donovang-Kuhlish, IBM
 Hans-Bart Van Impe, Belgacom
 Luis Munoz, Univ. Of Cantabria, Smart Santander
 Jarmo Eskelinen, Forum ViriumQuestions: 1(4) How to make a new technology ready for Living Lab testing?
 How to operate an interdisciplinary research team?
 How to get the users involved?
 What is the difference between “application” – “network” testing?Questions: 2(4)TV Kiosk: It looks like a very simple service? What is new about it?• What did you learn during the whole process ?• And more specifically about the importance of FIRE infrastructure (in this case the Virtual Wall and the portable platform) ?• How long did it take to come to this result ?• What was the biggest challenge to work in a “real” environment ?
Questions: 3(4) What are the motives, in experimentation with technology in the context of innovation environments established in cities?
 What are the opportunities companies as Future Internet technology providers see for experimentation in Smart City environments?
 What are the role of citizens and businesses  in Smart Cities as innovation environments?Questions: 4(4) What are the most difficult challenges faced with experimentation in such city environments?
 What is the role of living labs environments in smart cities?
 What are the potential benefits of future internet research and experimentation in smart cities`?
 How can a win-win-win situation (FIRE+LivingLabs+Smart Cities) created to strengthen urban innovation ecosystems?@ Future Internet Assembly conf., Ghent 2010-12-16 ” Future Internet Research and Experimentation By Adopting Living Labs – towards Smart Cities ”Session IV: Smart Cities and Future Internet Experimentation – Part I: Experimentation and Innovation Facilities for Smart Cities – Opportunities and Needs– Part II: Collaboration Requirements and Opportunities in the Future Internet, Living Labs and Smart City CommunitiesModerators:Alex Gluhak & Michael Nilsson, Smart Santander, FIREBALL projects

Michael Nilsson - Towards Future Internet: What can it mean for Living Labs and Smart Cities

  • 1.
    @ Future InternetAssembly conf., Ghent 2010-12-14 ” Future Internet Research and Experimentation By Adopting Living Labs – towards Smart Cities ”Living Labs and Smart Cities: Open innovation for the Future Internet – Session: Towards Future Internet: what can it mean for Living Labs and Smart CitiesModerator:Michael Nilsson, CDTProject Coordinator FIREBALL
  • 2.
    Session objectives.To reflecton “Smart Cities” as centres for user driven open innovation, using Future Internet technology in a user-friendly way to enable a truly knowledge-based society. New technologies can be used in developing new public services. Through the usage of Living Labs methodologies in the city, successful concepts can be identified, and user co-creation can enhance the innovation process, resulting in successful and sustainable services.
  • 3.
    Speakers & Panellists:•Piet Demeester, IBBT Margarete Donovang-Kuhlish, IBM
  • 4.
    Hans-Bart VanImpe, Belgacom
  • 5.
    Luis Munoz,Univ. Of Cantabria, Smart Santander
  • 6.
    Jarmo Eskelinen,Forum ViriumQuestions: 1(4) How to make a new technology ready for Living Lab testing?
  • 7.
    How tooperate an interdisciplinary research team?
  • 8.
    How toget the users involved?
  • 9.
    What isthe difference between “application” – “network” testing?Questions: 2(4)TV Kiosk: It looks like a very simple service? What is new about it?• What did you learn during the whole process ?• And more specifically about the importance of FIRE infrastructure (in this case the Virtual Wall and the portable platform) ?• How long did it take to come to this result ?• What was the biggest challenge to work in a “real” environment ?
  • 10.
    Questions: 3(4) Whatare the motives, in experimentation with technology in the context of innovation environments established in cities?
  • 11.
    What arethe opportunities companies as Future Internet technology providers see for experimentation in Smart City environments?
  • 12.
    What arethe role of citizens and businesses in Smart Cities as innovation environments?Questions: 4(4) What are the most difficult challenges faced with experimentation in such city environments?
  • 13.
    What isthe role of living labs environments in smart cities?
  • 14.
    What arethe potential benefits of future internet research and experimentation in smart cities`?
  • 15.
    How cana win-win-win situation (FIRE+LivingLabs+Smart Cities) created to strengthen urban innovation ecosystems?@ Future Internet Assembly conf., Ghent 2010-12-16 ” Future Internet Research and Experimentation By Adopting Living Labs – towards Smart Cities ”Session IV: Smart Cities and Future Internet Experimentation – Part I: Experimentation and Innovation Facilities for Smart Cities – Opportunities and Needs– Part II: Collaboration Requirements and Opportunities in the Future Internet, Living Labs and Smart City CommunitiesModerators:Alex Gluhak & Michael Nilsson, Smart Santander, FIREBALL projects
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Key Notes &Panellists I:• Moderator: Alex Gluhak Key Note, Mikael Börjeson, CDT
  • 18.
    Key Note,Margarete Donovang-Kuhlish, IBM
  • 19.
    Timo Lahnalampi,DIMES, Firestation
  • 20.
    Jose M.Hernandez-Munoz, Telefonica, Smart Santander
  • 21.
    Alvaro Oliveira,Alfamicro, Peripheria
  • 22.
  • 23.
    Martin Bryskov,Aarhus UniversityQuestions I: 1(2) ..
  • 24.
    …Key Notes &Panellists II:• Moderator: Michael Nilsson, CDT Key Note, Hans Schaffers, ESoCE Net, Fireball
  • 25.
    Key Note,Piet Demeester, IBBT
  • 26.
    Nicos Komninos,URENIO, Fireball
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Max Lemke,DG INFSO & Media
  • 29.
  • 30.
    Kimmo Ojuva,DIMES, Panlab IIQuestions II: 1(2) How can we increase the intelligence of cities? Does the collaboration among the Future Internet – Living Labs – Smart City communities provide insights and solutions? Any examples from the ENoLL?  How the collaboration of FI-LL-SC can address the current major challenges of cities in terms of competitiveness, employment, and environmental sustainability? 
  • 31.
    Questions II: 1(2)Which are the requirements from city governments in order to pave the way for Future Internet applications and services in the cities? Is there any benefit for cities?   Is there any link between the collaboration models of FI-LL-SC and the business models for Smart Cities? Can we outline any impact on the sustainability of smart cities? A definition of Smart City“We believe a city to be smart when investments in human and social capital and traditional (transport) and modern (ICT) communications infrastructurefuel sustainable economic growth and a high quality of life, with a wise management of natural resources, through participatory governance”A. Caragliu, C. del Bo, P. Nijkamp (2009)
  • 32.
    Key drivers fromSmart Cities of Future Internet Open Innovation (1).• Socio-economic ambitions of large cities / city marketing• Need for connectedness (cities – rural areas – regions)• Broadband deployment experiences, need for applications pull after the infrastructure• Technology push. Need to create experimentation environments to stimulate innovation
  • 33.
    Key drivers fromSmart Cities of Future Internet Open Innovation (2).• Driving network development• Impact of Internet infrastructure on business attractiveness of cities• Need to create open innovation environments to attract business and knowledge centres
  • 34.
    Future internet DomainLandscapeUnder construction
  • 35.
    Living Lab domainlandscape: user co-creationUnder construction
  • 36.
    Landscape layers (1)UnderconstructionCity and urban developmentInnovation facilities and processesNetworked applications and innovationsInternet technologies
  • 37.
    Landscape structure (2)”Themap of opportunities”Under constructionEnergy-efficiency in urban areasParticipative planning“Sustainable growth and high quality of life through participatory governance”Smart CityCitizens Needs and Networked ApplicationsEntrepreneurship support, jobsGovernment and citizens servicesAffordable health and care for allTestbeds in FP7: OneLab2, PII, VITAL++, WISEBED, FEDERICAEmerging Smart City Innovation ecosystemsFuture InternetResearchTechnologiesFor Smart CitiesSmart CityApplications(federated)TestbedsUser driveninnovationSmart City Internet pilots: Creative media, health and care, energyBarcelona, Manchester, Helsinki etcContent ManagementJOOMLAVisualisationWiki’sTechnologies For Smart Cities(Emerging, growing, maturing)IntelligenceData miningWeb designOLAPmashupsSimulation for decision makingLiving Labs: ENoLL (200+ living labs), APOLLON etc3D toolsFIRE experimentally-drivenadvanced research projects(OPNEX, ECODE, NANODATACENTERS, N4C etc)Collective intelligenceCollaboration WebCo-design toolsAccess for allBroadband networksCrowdsourcingCommunity supportVirtual collaborationSecurity and trust
  • 38.
    Landscape (example oftopics)Digital AgendaFuture Internet PPP (FP7)CIP pilots Smart CitiesInternet of Thingsaction planEnterprise-friendlyinfrastructuresEmpowered citizensSmart energySustainabledevelopmentCollaborative working facilitiesSmart mobilityHealth and careConnectedexperimentationfacilitiesCity-based living labsLiving lab methodologiesFIRE facilities / platformsRegional partnershipsE-participation platformsCollaborativenetworksIntelligent utility networksInteroperability supportConnectedworkplacesCommon platformsTrust, security, identity managementSemantic webOrchestrationsystemsPlatform integrationFP7-ICT projectsComposable services and networksFuture Internet architectureSensor networksVirtualisationFIRE projectsGENIAccess technologiesFederated networksAKARI (JP)
  • 39.
    FIRE and LivingLab interplay for Smart Cities innovation
  • 40.
    Smart Cities andLiving LabsThe Living Lab participatory processes combine both the strengths of collective intelligence and innovation capacity of people and the mediating role of ICTs in organising global value chains of suppliers and customers. – Living Labs are Open Innovation Ecosystems of Smart Cities.
  • 41.
    SEPTEMBER:FIREBALL at ICT2010in Brussels – BelgiumOCTOBER:FIREBALL at Knowledge Society Forum in Birmingham – UKNOVEMBER:FIREBALL at the Connected Smart City meeting in Helsinki – FinlandDECEMBER:FIREBALL at FIA in Ghent – BelgiumDONE!DONE!Meet up 2010
  • 42.
    DECEMBER 14 -17:FIREBALL at FIA in Ghent – BelgiumThanks!www.fireball4smartcities.eumichael.nilsson@cdt.ltu.se