Fire Protection Systems
Third Edition
Chapter 13 — Property Security, Emergency Response, and Fire
Protection Systems
Objectives
‣Identify and describe the three components of the means of
egress.
‣List and describe the override requirements for interior exit
stairway doors.
‣List and describe the requirements for delayed egress locking
systems.
Objectives
‣List and describe the requirements for sensor release of
electrically locked egress doors.
‣List and describe the requirements for door hardware release of
electrically locked egress doors.
‣Describe the purpose of an emergency building entrance system.
Introduction
‣List what is typically found inside an emergency building
entrance system.
‣List and describe the different methods of property access
through security gates and vehicle barriers.
Introduction
‣Focus on security that has increased over the past 20 years.
‣There is a growing need for protection against bombs, mass-
casualty shootings, espionage, and other threats.
‣Security devices and systems control and document who
enters or leaves a building, their purpose and destination.
Introduction
‣Balancing life safety and security is the primary challenge.
‣Unoccupied, unguarded, or open facilities are a threat.
‣Individuals must be able to get in and out in emergencies
even in these spaces.
‣Responders must be able to gain access.
Introduction
‣Model codes outline various requirements to deal with ingress
and egress.
‣Account for use and occupancy conditions
‣Require some systems to tie into the building fire protection
systems
‣No requirements to install door devices
Introduction
‣Security gates and barriers are becoming more widespread.
‣Perimeter security is prevalent.
‣Responding local fire and police must be able to gain access
in a timely manner.
Means of Egress
‣The continuous, unobstructed path of travel to the public way
‣Three parts
‣Exit access, exit, exit discharge
‣Everyone must travel through these parts.
‣Familiarity with them is critical.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Means of Egress
‣Exit access
‣Portion that leads to the exit
‣Any useable space considered
exit access until it reaches an
exit
‣Not closed attics, crawl spaces,
and roofs
‣Model codes limit travel distance to
an exit based on occupancy
condition and presence/absence of
sprinkler system.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Means of Egress
‣Exit
‣Portion separated from rest
of building by fire-resistant or
fire-rated construction
‣Exit stairway, horizontal
exit built to protect and
provide safe egress
‣No requirement for fire-rated
enclosure for one-level
stand-alone store with an
open floor and exit doors
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Means of Egress
‣Exit discharge
‣Portion between the exit
and public way
‣Takes a person from
the exit door away
from building to street,
alley, etc.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Means of Egress
‣Maintaining the means of egress
‣Over the past 15 or more years, there have been fires in all
types of use and occupancy conditions.
‣Many injuries/deaths result from locked, blocked, removed,
obscured, or damaged exit doors.
‣Model codes have requirements in the building, life safety,
and fire codes to address this.
‣Many problems with means of egress persist.
‣Must be able to identify the three egress components
Interior Exit Stairway Doors
‣General requirements
‣Usually interior exit stairway doors must open from both
sides without requiring special knowledge, effort, or keys.
‣Model codes list some exceptions.
‣Can lock for security and to control floor-to-floor
movement
‣Doors can lock on non-egress side for stairways that do
not serve more than four stories.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Interior Exit Stairway Doors
‣This facilitates an
emergency responder
to turn a key, push a
button, or flip a switch
on or near the fire
alarm annunciator
panel.
‣By unlocking the
doors, the occupants
and emergency
responders are able to
relocate to another
floor.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Delayed Egress Locking
‣When security is a concern, it may be
okay to control exiting for safety and
security reasons.
‣Facilities that work with people
with cognitive or psychiatric
challenges
‣Large retail stores
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Delayed Egress Locking
‣Model codes include a section on delayed egress locking.
‣Considerations:
‣Use and occupancy conditions
‣Presence of automatic sprinkler system or approved
automatic fire/heat detection system
‣Specific installation requirements:
‣Examples include unlocking on activation of sprinkler/heat
detection system, loss of power, application of force,
relocking must occur manually, etc.
Delayed Egress Locking
‣Other requirements include
signage within 12 inches of the
door hardware:
‣Instructions to push on the
release device
‣Emergency lights
‣The sign must also state that the
door will open within 15 seconds
(30 seconds if approved)
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Delayed Egress Locking
‣Other model code information
‣The system hardware must be listed in accordance with UL
294, Standard for Access Control System Units.
‣2018 IBC® allows only one delayed egress door lock in an
occupant’s path out of a building.
‣Each model code may have additional and differing
requirements.
‣Know jurisdictional requirements.
Sensor Release Egress Doors
‣Sometimes it is critical to control
who enters a building.
‣Many building owners install
electrically locked security
devices on entrance doors to
restrict or prevent unwanted
visitors from entering.
‣Should not prevent anyone from
getting out
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Sensor Release Egress Doors
‣Model codes include many requirements.
‣Require unlocking on activation of automatic release sensor,
loss of power, or activation of other systems such as
sprinklers or fire detection
‣Manual unlocking device with signage and emergency lights
required
‣Some model codes require doors to stay open during
business hours.
‣The system hardware must be listed in accordance with UL
294, Standard for Access Control System Units.
Door Hardware Release of Electrically
Locked Egress Doors
‣This method addresses concerns about criminals and terrorists
activating fire protection systems to gain unauthorized entry.
‣Eliminates releasing hardware and interface with other
systems but still provide secure door
Door Hardware Release of Electrically
Locked Egress Doors
‣Model code requirements and differences
‣IBC® establishes use and occupancy conditions.
‣NFPA standards do not have these conditions.
‣The system hardware must be listed in accordance with UL
294, Standard for Access Control System Units.
Door Hardware Release of Electrically
Locked Egress Doors
‣Model code requirements and differences (cont’d)
‣Specifics:
‣Hardware on door leaf must have obvious method of
operation to the occupant.
‣Hardware for occupant release must be affixed to door
leaf (NFPA).
‣Hardware for occupant release must be operable in all
lighting conditions (IBC®).
‣Installed hardware must be operable with one hand.
Door Hardware Release of Electrically
Locked Egress Doors
‣ Model code requirements and differences
(cont’d)
‣ Specifics (cont’d):
‣ When listed hardware is operating, power to
electromagnetic/electric lock must be immediately
interrupted.
‣ Door must unlock following loss of power to the listed
hardware.
‣ Where panic or fire exit hardware is required, operation
must release electromagnetic lock (IBC®).
Fire Department Access Systems
‣Emergency responders are adept at gaining access to buildings.
‣Forcible entry is performed if access is not readily available,
to reduce operational delays that could lead to out-of-control
fire or injuries.
‣When justifiable, property owners do not object to forcible
entry, but it becomes problematic for false alarm situations.
Fire Department Access Systems
‣ Emergency building entrance
systems allow entry without
knocking down doors/breaking
windows.
‣ Safe-life security box is
anchored in or to the entrance
wall.
‣ Many jurisdictions require them
for all buildings that has fire
protection system except one-
and two-family homes.
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Fire Department Access Systems
‣The newer boxes use advances in engineering that integrate
electronic technology to perform a number of functions.
‣Employs fob-type device that is designed to be operated
within the registered jurisdiction.
‣Improved security by setting time limit that helps deactivating
device if lost or stolen.
Fire Department Access Systems
‣SDS, HMMP, and HMIS documentation may be required on site.
‣Amount of information may require additional/separate
boxes.
‣Box size varies with documentation and number of keys.
‣SDS and HMIS require larger boxes.
‣Many documents are now in USB flash drive, CD/DVD
format, or accessible via wireless devices.
Security Gates
‣Restricting access to communities or facilities with gates is now
common.
‣Gates vary from small plastic, to motor-driven metal gates, to
concrete crash barriers.
‣Emergency responders must be able to get through without
delay.
‣Emergency responders should be involved in decision making.
Security Gates
‣Siren sensors
‣Detect emergency vehicle sirens
and operate gate mechanism
‣One of the most common access
systems
‣Allow fire personnel to stay in the
vehicle
‣Must be inspected periodically
‣Usually have manual override
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
© A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Security Gates
‣Proprietary fire department
access key
‣Some gates/barriers require
key for operation.
‣May be the same as key
for emergency building
access system
‣Not as efficient as sirens but
simpler
‣Put key in switch and turn
‣Can act as backup to
sirens © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
Security Gates
‣Access cards, fobs, and access codes
‣One of the least desirable methods
‣Responders must leave their vehicles and follow a number of
steps.
‣Present a fob
‣Enter a code into security access panel
‣Sometimes the cards and codes fail, losing valuable time.
‣Life and property can be placed in great danger.
Security Gates
‣Radio frequency sensor
‣Similar to siren system but uses emergency responder’s radio
‣Responders can stay in vehicle.
‣Periodic inspection and testing are necessary.
‣Although the sensor is sealed, it can lose its sensitivity and
detection capabilities due to variations in temperature and
exposure to dirt or other debris.
Security Gates
‣Fire protection system interface
‣Gate control mechanisms connect to fire alarm system to
perform control functions.
‣Only an alarm initiation device such as detector or water flow
switch is required to activate.
‣Once signaled to operate, gate opens in advance of fire
department’s arrival.
‣Method is not available if there is no fire protection system.

1540 Ch 13 PowerPoint.pdf

  • 1.
    Fire Protection Systems ThirdEdition Chapter 13 — Property Security, Emergency Response, and Fire Protection Systems
  • 2.
    Objectives ‣Identify and describethe three components of the means of egress. ‣List and describe the override requirements for interior exit stairway doors. ‣List and describe the requirements for delayed egress locking systems.
  • 3.
    Objectives ‣List and describethe requirements for sensor release of electrically locked egress doors. ‣List and describe the requirements for door hardware release of electrically locked egress doors. ‣Describe the purpose of an emergency building entrance system.
  • 4.
    Introduction ‣List what istypically found inside an emergency building entrance system. ‣List and describe the different methods of property access through security gates and vehicle barriers.
  • 5.
    Introduction ‣Focus on securitythat has increased over the past 20 years. ‣There is a growing need for protection against bombs, mass- casualty shootings, espionage, and other threats. ‣Security devices and systems control and document who enters or leaves a building, their purpose and destination.
  • 6.
    Introduction ‣Balancing life safetyand security is the primary challenge. ‣Unoccupied, unguarded, or open facilities are a threat. ‣Individuals must be able to get in and out in emergencies even in these spaces. ‣Responders must be able to gain access.
  • 7.
    Introduction ‣Model codes outlinevarious requirements to deal with ingress and egress. ‣Account for use and occupancy conditions ‣Require some systems to tie into the building fire protection systems ‣No requirements to install door devices
  • 8.
    Introduction ‣Security gates andbarriers are becoming more widespread. ‣Perimeter security is prevalent. ‣Responding local fire and police must be able to gain access in a timely manner.
  • 9.
    Means of Egress ‣Thecontinuous, unobstructed path of travel to the public way ‣Three parts ‣Exit access, exit, exit discharge ‣Everyone must travel through these parts. ‣Familiarity with them is critical. © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
  • 10.
    Means of Egress ‣Exitaccess ‣Portion that leads to the exit ‣Any useable space considered exit access until it reaches an exit ‣Not closed attics, crawl spaces, and roofs ‣Model codes limit travel distance to an exit based on occupancy condition and presence/absence of sprinkler system. © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
  • 11.
    Means of Egress ‣Exit ‣Portionseparated from rest of building by fire-resistant or fire-rated construction ‣Exit stairway, horizontal exit built to protect and provide safe egress ‣No requirement for fire-rated enclosure for one-level stand-alone store with an open floor and exit doors © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
  • 12.
    Means of Egress ‣Exitdischarge ‣Portion between the exit and public way ‣Takes a person from the exit door away from building to street, alley, etc. © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
  • 13.
    Means of Egress ‣Maintainingthe means of egress ‣Over the past 15 or more years, there have been fires in all types of use and occupancy conditions. ‣Many injuries/deaths result from locked, blocked, removed, obscured, or damaged exit doors. ‣Model codes have requirements in the building, life safety, and fire codes to address this. ‣Many problems with means of egress persist. ‣Must be able to identify the three egress components
  • 14.
    Interior Exit StairwayDoors ‣General requirements ‣Usually interior exit stairway doors must open from both sides without requiring special knowledge, effort, or keys. ‣Model codes list some exceptions. ‣Can lock for security and to control floor-to-floor movement ‣Doors can lock on non-egress side for stairways that do not serve more than four stories. © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning. © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • 15.
    Interior Exit StairwayDoors ‣This facilitates an emergency responder to turn a key, push a button, or flip a switch on or near the fire alarm annunciator panel. ‣By unlocking the doors, the occupants and emergency responders are able to relocate to another floor. © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
  • 16.
    Delayed Egress Locking ‣Whensecurity is a concern, it may be okay to control exiting for safety and security reasons. ‣Facilities that work with people with cognitive or psychiatric challenges ‣Large retail stores © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
  • 17.
    Delayed Egress Locking ‣Modelcodes include a section on delayed egress locking. ‣Considerations: ‣Use and occupancy conditions ‣Presence of automatic sprinkler system or approved automatic fire/heat detection system ‣Specific installation requirements: ‣Examples include unlocking on activation of sprinkler/heat detection system, loss of power, application of force, relocking must occur manually, etc.
  • 18.
    Delayed Egress Locking ‣Otherrequirements include signage within 12 inches of the door hardware: ‣Instructions to push on the release device ‣Emergency lights ‣The sign must also state that the door will open within 15 seconds (30 seconds if approved) © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • 19.
    Delayed Egress Locking ‣Othermodel code information ‣The system hardware must be listed in accordance with UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units. ‣2018 IBC® allows only one delayed egress door lock in an occupant’s path out of a building. ‣Each model code may have additional and differing requirements. ‣Know jurisdictional requirements.
  • 20.
    Sensor Release EgressDoors ‣Sometimes it is critical to control who enters a building. ‣Many building owners install electrically locked security devices on entrance doors to restrict or prevent unwanted visitors from entering. ‣Should not prevent anyone from getting out © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • 21.
    Sensor Release EgressDoors ‣Model codes include many requirements. ‣Require unlocking on activation of automatic release sensor, loss of power, or activation of other systems such as sprinklers or fire detection ‣Manual unlocking device with signage and emergency lights required ‣Some model codes require doors to stay open during business hours. ‣The system hardware must be listed in accordance with UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units.
  • 22.
    Door Hardware Releaseof Electrically Locked Egress Doors ‣This method addresses concerns about criminals and terrorists activating fire protection systems to gain unauthorized entry. ‣Eliminates releasing hardware and interface with other systems but still provide secure door
  • 23.
    Door Hardware Releaseof Electrically Locked Egress Doors ‣Model code requirements and differences ‣IBC® establishes use and occupancy conditions. ‣NFPA standards do not have these conditions. ‣The system hardware must be listed in accordance with UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units.
  • 24.
    Door Hardware Releaseof Electrically Locked Egress Doors ‣Model code requirements and differences (cont’d) ‣Specifics: ‣Hardware on door leaf must have obvious method of operation to the occupant. ‣Hardware for occupant release must be affixed to door leaf (NFPA). ‣Hardware for occupant release must be operable in all lighting conditions (IBC®). ‣Installed hardware must be operable with one hand.
  • 25.
    Door Hardware Releaseof Electrically Locked Egress Doors ‣ Model code requirements and differences (cont’d) ‣ Specifics (cont’d): ‣ When listed hardware is operating, power to electromagnetic/electric lock must be immediately interrupted. ‣ Door must unlock following loss of power to the listed hardware. ‣ Where panic or fire exit hardware is required, operation must release electromagnetic lock (IBC®).
  • 26.
    Fire Department AccessSystems ‣Emergency responders are adept at gaining access to buildings. ‣Forcible entry is performed if access is not readily available, to reduce operational delays that could lead to out-of-control fire or injuries. ‣When justifiable, property owners do not object to forcible entry, but it becomes problematic for false alarm situations.
  • 27.
    Fire Department AccessSystems ‣ Emergency building entrance systems allow entry without knocking down doors/breaking windows. ‣ Safe-life security box is anchored in or to the entrance wall. ‣ Many jurisdictions require them for all buildings that has fire protection system except one- and two-family homes. © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • 28.
    Fire Department AccessSystems ‣The newer boxes use advances in engineering that integrate electronic technology to perform a number of functions. ‣Employs fob-type device that is designed to be operated within the registered jurisdiction. ‣Improved security by setting time limit that helps deactivating device if lost or stolen.
  • 29.
    Fire Department AccessSystems ‣SDS, HMMP, and HMIS documentation may be required on site. ‣Amount of information may require additional/separate boxes. ‣Box size varies with documentation and number of keys. ‣SDS and HMIS require larger boxes. ‣Many documents are now in USB flash drive, CD/DVD format, or accessible via wireless devices.
  • 30.
    Security Gates ‣Restricting accessto communities or facilities with gates is now common. ‣Gates vary from small plastic, to motor-driven metal gates, to concrete crash barriers. ‣Emergency responders must be able to get through without delay. ‣Emergency responders should be involved in decision making.
  • 31.
    Security Gates ‣Siren sensors ‣Detectemergency vehicle sirens and operate gate mechanism ‣One of the most common access systems ‣Allow fire personnel to stay in the vehicle ‣Must be inspected periodically ‣Usually have manual override © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
  • 32.
    Security Gates ‣Proprietary firedepartment access key ‣Some gates/barriers require key for operation. ‣May be the same as key for emergency building access system ‣Not as efficient as sirens but simpler ‣Put key in switch and turn ‣Can act as backup to sirens © A. Maurice Jones, Jr./Jones & Bartlett Learning
  • 33.
    Security Gates ‣Access cards,fobs, and access codes ‣One of the least desirable methods ‣Responders must leave their vehicles and follow a number of steps. ‣Present a fob ‣Enter a code into security access panel ‣Sometimes the cards and codes fail, losing valuable time. ‣Life and property can be placed in great danger.
  • 34.
    Security Gates ‣Radio frequencysensor ‣Similar to siren system but uses emergency responder’s radio ‣Responders can stay in vehicle. ‣Periodic inspection and testing are necessary. ‣Although the sensor is sealed, it can lose its sensitivity and detection capabilities due to variations in temperature and exposure to dirt or other debris.
  • 35.
    Security Gates ‣Fire protectionsystem interface ‣Gate control mechanisms connect to fire alarm system to perform control functions. ‣Only an alarm initiation device such as detector or water flow switch is required to activate. ‣Once signaled to operate, gate opens in advance of fire department’s arrival. ‣Method is not available if there is no fire protection system.