Human-computer Trust
Theoretical underpinnings 
HCI perspective 
• Study computing and computational artifacts as they 
relate to the human condition. 
Participation 
Cooperation 
Trust perspective 
• Study how it can be crucial element in human 
relationship 
Human Computer Trust 
• Represents the Value centered Interactions 
The interception of Human-Computer interactions 
components; and The dynamic nature of trust in 
relationships
key principles 
The ongoing cultural shift 
• a ever-widening range of digital artifacts is 
transforming our daily lives. 
The way we 
communicate, 
locate, play, learn, 
and much more 
How we relate to technology is 
• less and less about the… devices; and 
• more about the… activities. 
Information technology context is 
• becoming pervasive; and 
Computing is 
• becoming ubiquitous
WHY TRUST….
Contextual aim 
Trust contemplates 
• Social phenomena 
• A complex two-way relationship 
Trust emerges from 
• An interpersonal organization 
• A specific social situation 
• A specific social context 
• Positive experiences 
• Interactions 
• Active participation 
• Cooperative relations 
SUPPORT 
& 
SUSTAIN
Contextual aim 
Trusting represents 
• A reinsurance element 
Trusting comes associated 
• With certain properties that help to support 
users intended behaviours 
Trusting relies on 
• The identification of trustworthy making 
qualities 
What underlies 
people's beliefs
The research…
The research contemplates 
A need for identify 
1. trust social values (qualities) that underlies 
people’s trust beliefs 
1. The reliability of those trustworthy making 
qualities 
1. How those (trustworthy making qualities) 
are represented in today’s ongoing cultural 
shift
Stage 1 (the process) 
What is trust 
social 
phenomena? 
Trust concept 
map 
Extensive 
literature review 
Online 
communities 
concept map 
Participatory 
design sessions 
Modeling Trust as a social phenomena 
A social-technical 
model of trust 
Technology 
acceptance 
models 
1
Stage 2 (Validation) 
How does trust 
relate to users' 
activities? 
Trust trust effects 
in basic online 
activities 
survey 
Elicitation of trust 
effects in 
interactions 
survey 
trust concept map 
model of trust 
Trust survey 
trust concept map 
model of trust 
OLC concept 
map 
Eliciting the reliability of those trustworthy making qualities 
A model of 
Human-computer 
Trust 
2
Results (associated notions) 
Trusting is… 
• process of believing in others behaviours 
Reflects a 
• risk 
While some are more 
willing to take the 
risks others don’t 
Level of 
commitment of 
both parts 
Strong incentives to 
believe that 
determinate person, 
service or tool is in 
fact trustworthy
Predominant factors 
Attitudes towards sharing 
• Shared history & identity 
• Respect and have honorable intentions 
• Be reliable 
• Be known 
• Sympathy & friendliness 
Attitudes towards relate 
• Honesty & transparency 
• know the person 
• Be willing to 
• Empathy 
• Reliable source 
Attitudes towards communicate 
• Honest & Transparent behaviours 
• Receive support 
• Feel secure 
• Share similar interests 
Trust Predisposition 
Reciprocity 
Competency 
Benevolency 
Predictability 
Honesty
Trust & Privacy by safe we mean… 
felling a degree of control who will read 
or have access to their shared 
resources, comments and assignments. 
Students feel safe to share
Trust & collaboration 
Is much related with commitments 
• But those are perceived differently from person to 
person 
Trust influence commitments 
• group working dynamic 
Major needs -> 
• Predict how if others will behave as expected
Trust-enabling interactions 
By observing trust enabling qualities we can 
• Enables more honest & transparent behaviours 
• Predict others activities patterns 
• Perceive others competencies 
• creates emphatic relations which, enable Social 
engagement, 
• Diminish group hostility which, increase group 
commitment 
• Foster group motivation & willingness to cooperate
Human Computer Trust model 
Trust Predisposition 
Motivation 
Willingness 
Competency 
Predictability 
Reciprocity 
Benovelence 
Honesty 
Expectations 
Contributes 
Rational perception 
Emotional 
perception 
Relationships 
Contributes 
Commitments 
Intentions 
Predisposition to cooperate 
Predisposition to relate 
Behaviours 
Engagement 
Qualities Beliefs intentions Attitudes
Application 
Support the design of a instrument to Assess/ 
evaluate trust-enabling interaction design 
qualities 
Sousa, S., Lamas, D.; 
Shmorgun, I.; Arakelyan, A. 
(2014). 
A design space for trust 
enabling interaction design. 
In MIDI 2014, ACM (2014) 
This toolset provides 
designers lenses to 
assess the act of 
design for trust-enable 
interactions and further 
evaluate if their design 
propositions have 
been reflected in the 
design outcome.
Thank you!

More Related Content

PPTX
Sousa, Sonia; Lamas, David; Dias, Paulo (2012). The Implications of Trust on ...
PPTX
Trust from a Human Computer Interaction perspective
PPTX
A design space for Trust-enabling Interaction Design
PPTX
Leveraging Human-Centered Computing with Trust
PPS
Sonia Sousa
PPTX
Trust building in virtual teams
PDF
The Benefits of Explicit/Implicit Hyper-Personalization (Rafal Ohme, Digital ...
PPTX
2015-10-14 research seminar 2
Sousa, Sonia; Lamas, David; Dias, Paulo (2012). The Implications of Trust on ...
Trust from a Human Computer Interaction perspective
A design space for Trust-enabling Interaction Design
Leveraging Human-Centered Computing with Trust
Sonia Sousa
Trust building in virtual teams
The Benefits of Explicit/Implicit Hyper-Personalization (Rafal Ohme, Digital ...
2015-10-14 research seminar 2

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
How To SASS - af morningtrain.dk
PPTX
Workshop 1 - User eXperience evaluation
PDF
Lesson 17
PDF
Lesson 16
PPTX
Lesson 1
PDF
Lesson 07
PDF
Lesson 03
PDF
Lesson 03
PPTX
Developing Interactive systems - lesson 2
PPTX
Css ms megha
PPTX
HTML Lesson 1
PPTX
eduHcc lesson2-3
PDF
Lesson 02
PPTX
Ifi7174 lesson2
PPTX
Trust workshop
PDF
Lesson 12
PPTX
A key contribution for leveraging trustful interactions
PPTX
HTML Lesson 5
PDF
Lesson 11
PPTX
IFI7184.DT lesson1- Programming languages
How To SASS - af morningtrain.dk
Workshop 1 - User eXperience evaluation
Lesson 17
Lesson 16
Lesson 1
Lesson 07
Lesson 03
Lesson 03
Developing Interactive systems - lesson 2
Css ms megha
HTML Lesson 1
eduHcc lesson2-3
Lesson 02
Ifi7174 lesson2
Trust workshop
Lesson 12
A key contribution for leveraging trustful interactions
HTML Lesson 5
Lesson 11
IFI7184.DT lesson1- Programming languages
Ad

Similar to 20 06-2014 (20)

PPT
Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence
DOCX
Social life in digital societies: Trust, Reputation and Privacy EINS summer s...
PPT
How to study trust online
PDF
Can social awareness foster trust building in global software teams?
DOCX
A computational dynamic trust model
DOCX
A COMPUTATIONAL DYNAMIC TRUST MODEL FOR USER AUTHORIZATION - IEEE PROJECTS I...
DOCX
A computational dynamic trust model
DOCX
A COMPUTATIONAL DYNAMIC TRUST MODEL FOR USER AUTHORIZATION
PDF
Social Modeling
PDF
Trust_Security-Serene-Risc-2015-marsh
PDF
Riseptis report 1
PPTX
Trust blueprints icds 2014
PDF
Trust by Design: Rethinking Technology Risk
PPT
Esecurity framework-camp-final
PDF
Trustworthy Micro-task Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities
PDF
Simone Borsci - Deceptive design, user experience and trust
PDF
My ph.d Defence
PDF
Trust networks tutorial-iicai-12-15-2011
PDF
Webinar The Role of Trust in Digital policy 2016
Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence
Social life in digital societies: Trust, Reputation and Privacy EINS summer s...
How to study trust online
Can social awareness foster trust building in global software teams?
A computational dynamic trust model
A COMPUTATIONAL DYNAMIC TRUST MODEL FOR USER AUTHORIZATION - IEEE PROJECTS I...
A computational dynamic trust model
A COMPUTATIONAL DYNAMIC TRUST MODEL FOR USER AUTHORIZATION
Social Modeling
Trust_Security-Serene-Risc-2015-marsh
Riseptis report 1
Trust blueprints icds 2014
Trust by Design: Rethinking Technology Risk
Esecurity framework-camp-final
Trustworthy Micro-task Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities
Simone Borsci - Deceptive design, user experience and trust
My ph.d Defence
Trust networks tutorial-iicai-12-15-2011
Webinar The Role of Trust in Digital policy 2016
Ad

More from Sónia (20)

PPSX
MGA 673 – Evaluating User Experience (part1)
PPTX
MG673 - Session 1
PPTX
Workshop 1
PPTX
Ifi7184 lesson7
PPTX
Ifi7184 lesson6
PPTX
Ifi7184 lesson5
PPTX
Ifi7184 lesson4
PPTX
Ifi7174 lesson4
PPTX
Ifi7174 lesson3
PPTX
Ifi7184 lesson3
PPTX
Ifi7174 lesson1
PPTX
Ifi7184.DT lesson 2
PPTX
IFI7184.DT about the course
PPTX
Comparative evaluation
PPTX
Ifi7155 Contextualization
PPTX
Hcc lesson7
PPTX
Hcc lesson6
PPTX
Human Centered Computing (introduction)
PPTX
Ifi7155 project-final
PPTX
Workshop 1 (analysis and Presenting)
MGA 673 – Evaluating User Experience (part1)
MG673 - Session 1
Workshop 1
Ifi7184 lesson7
Ifi7184 lesson6
Ifi7184 lesson5
Ifi7184 lesson4
Ifi7174 lesson4
Ifi7174 lesson3
Ifi7184 lesson3
Ifi7174 lesson1
Ifi7184.DT lesson 2
IFI7184.DT about the course
Comparative evaluation
Ifi7155 Contextualization
Hcc lesson7
Hcc lesson6
Human Centered Computing (introduction)
Ifi7155 project-final
Workshop 1 (analysis and Presenting)

20 06-2014

  • 2. Theoretical underpinnings HCI perspective • Study computing and computational artifacts as they relate to the human condition. Participation Cooperation Trust perspective • Study how it can be crucial element in human relationship Human Computer Trust • Represents the Value centered Interactions The interception of Human-Computer interactions components; and The dynamic nature of trust in relationships
  • 3. key principles The ongoing cultural shift • a ever-widening range of digital artifacts is transforming our daily lives. The way we communicate, locate, play, learn, and much more How we relate to technology is • less and less about the… devices; and • more about the… activities. Information technology context is • becoming pervasive; and Computing is • becoming ubiquitous
  • 5. Contextual aim Trust contemplates • Social phenomena • A complex two-way relationship Trust emerges from • An interpersonal organization • A specific social situation • A specific social context • Positive experiences • Interactions • Active participation • Cooperative relations SUPPORT & SUSTAIN
  • 6. Contextual aim Trusting represents • A reinsurance element Trusting comes associated • With certain properties that help to support users intended behaviours Trusting relies on • The identification of trustworthy making qualities What underlies people's beliefs
  • 8. The research contemplates A need for identify 1. trust social values (qualities) that underlies people’s trust beliefs 1. The reliability of those trustworthy making qualities 1. How those (trustworthy making qualities) are represented in today’s ongoing cultural shift
  • 9. Stage 1 (the process) What is trust social phenomena? Trust concept map Extensive literature review Online communities concept map Participatory design sessions Modeling Trust as a social phenomena A social-technical model of trust Technology acceptance models 1
  • 10. Stage 2 (Validation) How does trust relate to users' activities? Trust trust effects in basic online activities survey Elicitation of trust effects in interactions survey trust concept map model of trust Trust survey trust concept map model of trust OLC concept map Eliciting the reliability of those trustworthy making qualities A model of Human-computer Trust 2
  • 11. Results (associated notions) Trusting is… • process of believing in others behaviours Reflects a • risk While some are more willing to take the risks others don’t Level of commitment of both parts Strong incentives to believe that determinate person, service or tool is in fact trustworthy
  • 12. Predominant factors Attitudes towards sharing • Shared history & identity • Respect and have honorable intentions • Be reliable • Be known • Sympathy & friendliness Attitudes towards relate • Honesty & transparency • know the person • Be willing to • Empathy • Reliable source Attitudes towards communicate • Honest & Transparent behaviours • Receive support • Feel secure • Share similar interests Trust Predisposition Reciprocity Competency Benevolency Predictability Honesty
  • 13. Trust & Privacy by safe we mean… felling a degree of control who will read or have access to their shared resources, comments and assignments. Students feel safe to share
  • 14. Trust & collaboration Is much related with commitments • But those are perceived differently from person to person Trust influence commitments • group working dynamic Major needs -> • Predict how if others will behave as expected
  • 15. Trust-enabling interactions By observing trust enabling qualities we can • Enables more honest & transparent behaviours • Predict others activities patterns • Perceive others competencies • creates emphatic relations which, enable Social engagement, • Diminish group hostility which, increase group commitment • Foster group motivation & willingness to cooperate
  • 16. Human Computer Trust model Trust Predisposition Motivation Willingness Competency Predictability Reciprocity Benovelence Honesty Expectations Contributes Rational perception Emotional perception Relationships Contributes Commitments Intentions Predisposition to cooperate Predisposition to relate Behaviours Engagement Qualities Beliefs intentions Attitudes
  • 17. Application Support the design of a instrument to Assess/ evaluate trust-enabling interaction design qualities Sousa, S., Lamas, D.; Shmorgun, I.; Arakelyan, A. (2014). A design space for trust enabling interaction design. In MIDI 2014, ACM (2014) This toolset provides designers lenses to assess the act of design for trust-enable interactions and further evaluate if their design propositions have been reflected in the design outcome.