Download as PDF, PPTX
Knowledge Sharing in the Networked World of the Internet of Things
The document discusses the transformative impact of the Internet of Things (IoT) on knowledge sharing and creation, emphasizing a shift from traditional information sources to a more networked and participatory model. It highlights both benefits, such as enhanced connectivity and innovation, and potential drawbacks, including privacy concerns and social disparities. Overall, the future landscape of knowledge management will require adaptation to new technologies and evolving organizational structures.
More Related Content
Similar to Knowledge Sharing in the Networked World of the Internet of Things
More from Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project
Knowledge Sharing in the Networked World of the Internet of Things
- 1. Knowledge Sharing inthe Networked World of the Internet of Things Lee Rainie - @lrainie Director, Internet, Science, and Technology research Pew Research Center KMWorld Conference 11.6.14
- 3. Carla Hesse -Stanford historian: “Knowledge is no longer that which is contained in space, but that which passes through it, like a series of vectors, each having direction and duration yet without precise location or limit…. “In the future, it seems, there will be no fixed canons of texts and no fixed epistemological boundaries between disciplines, only paths of inquiry, modes of integration, and moments of encounter.”
- 4. What the Internetof Things will do to/for you •Expands the building blocks of knowledge •Balloons the places where knowledge originates •Changes the processes of creating knowledge •Changes your capacity to gain knowledge •Changes your ability to dispense knowledge •Changes the value of knowledge •Changes the velocity of knowledge creation
- 5. So … knowledgemanagers are now in: •The data / computer science business •The artificial intelligence / algorithms business •The augmented reality business •The virtual reality business •The Taxonomies 2.0 business •The media analytics business •The social outreach and input business
- 6. Networked knowledge inorganizations A four-part harmony 1.Networked individuals 2.Networked information 3.Networked workplaces 4.Networked enterprises
- 7. Networked knowledge inorganizations A four-part harmony 1.Networked individuals
- 8. Networked Individualism Themove to looser, far-flung networks
- 9. Networked knowledge inorganizations A four-part harmony 1.Networked individuals 2.Networked information
- 10. The nature ofnetworked information •Pervasively generated •Pervasively consumed •Personal via new filters •Participatory / social / spreadable •Linked / scaled •Continually edited / context changed •Real-time / just-in-time •Timeless / searchable •Given meaning via networks & algorithms
- 11. Networked knowledge inorganizations A four-part harmony 1.Networked individuals 2.Networked information 3.Networked workplaces
- 12. Traditional “fishbowl” ---Networked “switchboard” •All work in same room •Densely-knit, direct connections •Most interactions within a small group •Frequent contact; recurrent interactions •Long-tie duration •Mentoring by co-located workmates •Repetitive tasks, deskilling •Power array: top of the hierarchy •Each works separately •Sparsely-knit, not know each other •Many people contacted in multiple workplaces •Variable, changing frequency of contact •Switching with multiple ties •Less mentoring, harder to learn tacit knowledge •Multiple tasks, added skilling •Power array: Betweenness Centrality
- 13. Networked work: Balancesheet Assets •Surfaces extra information •Applies talents where needed •Multiple perspectives on solutions •More fluid and nimble •Potentially more innovative Debits •Trust •Focus •Coordination •Loyalty •Extra effort •Institutional memory lapses
- 14. Networked knowledge inorganizations A four-part harmony 1.Networked individuals 2.Networked information 3.Networked workplaces 4.Networked enterprises
- 15. Knowledge value movesfrom stocks to flows – The Power of Pull – John Hagel, John Seely Brown, Lang Davison
- 17. Networked knowledge inorganizations … Enabled by four tech revolutions 1.Internet / broadband 2.Mobile 3.Social networking and media 4.The emergent Internet of Things
- 18.
- 19.
- 20. Survey 6 –2013-4 –November 25–January 13 –2,551 respondents •19% research scientist •10% authors, editors, journalists •9% entrepreneurs, biz leader •8% tech developers •8% activists •7% futurists, consultants •2% legislators, lawyers •2% pioneers http://bit.ly/OgpZkS Digital Life in 2025 The Internet of Things Will Thrive by 2025 Net Threats by 2025 AI, robotics and the future of jobs Killer apps in the gigabit age Cyber attacks likely to increase
- 21. Digital Life in2025 This is an open-ended question allowing you to make your own prediction about the role of the Internet in people’s lives in 2025 and the impact it will have on social, economic and political processes. Good and/or bad, what do you expect to be the most significant overall impacts of our uses of the Internet on humanity between now and 2025?
- 22. The Internet willbecome ‘like electricity’ — less visible, yet more deeply embedded in people’s lives for good and ill
- 23. "A Day ofGlass" - Corning https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZkHpNnXLB0
- 24. The Internet ofThings Will Thrive by 2025 The evolution of embedded devices and the Internet/Cloud of Things —As billions of devices, artifacts, and accessories are networked, will the Internet of Things have widespread and beneficial effects on the everyday lives of the public by 2025?
- 25. Future of Internetof Things Yes – widespread and beneficial 83% No 17%
- 26. It‘s the nextrevolution. Upsides: enhanced health, convenience, productivity, safety, and vastly more useful information. Downsides: privacy challenges, over-hyped expectations, tech complexity, lagging human adaptation to new realities. The Internet of Things Will Thrive by 2025
- 27.
- 28.
- 29. Check on baby– wearable monitor
- 30. Get most ofyour meds – pill sensor
- 31.
- 32.
- 33. Heat your homeefficiently – smart thermostat
- 34. Make sure ovenis off – smart outlets
- 35. Track down lostkeys - tags
- 36. Keep your plantsalive
- 37.
- 38.
- 39.
- 40.
- 41. Share your findings– ‘aircasting’
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
- 45. Get advanced warning– mudslide detection
- 46.
- 47.
- 48.
- 49.
- 50.
- 51.
- 52. Keep track ofyour assets
- 53. Hopeful theses 1)Information sharing over the Internet will be effortlessly interwoven into daily life. 2) Artificial intelligence, augmented reality, wearable devices, and big data will make people more aware of their world and their own behavior – especially aid in health care. 3) The spread of the Internet will enhance global connectivity that fosters more planetary relationships and less ignorance. 4) An Internet-enabled revolution in education will spread more opportunities, with less money spent on real estate and teachers.
- 54. Downbeat theses 1)The realities of this data-drenched world raise substantial concerns about privacy and people’s abilities to control their own lives. The level of profiling and targeting will grow and amplify social, economic, and political struggles. 2) Dangerous divides between haves and have-nots may expand, resulting in resentment and possible violence. 3) Abuses and abusers will ‘evolve and scale.’ Human nature isn’t changing; there’s laziness, bullying, stalking, stupidity, pornography, dirty tricks, crime, and those who practice them have new capacity to make life miserable for others.
- 55. Downbeat theses (con’t) 4) Pressured by these changes, governments and corporations will try to assert power as they invoke security and cultural norms. 5) Humans and their organizations may not respond quickly enough to challenges presented by complex networks. 6) There will be complicated, unintended consequences: ‘We will live in a world where many things won’t work and nobody will know how to fix them.’
- 56. So … knowledgemanagers are now in: •The data / computer science business •The artificial intelligence / algorithms business •The augmented reality business •The virtual reality business •The Taxonomies 2.0 business •The media analytics business •The networking with ‘frenemies’ business
- 57.