Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by Sandia
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department
of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
SAND2016-8647 C
Basin-scale Density-dependent Groundwater
flow Near a Salt Repository
Kristopher L. Kuhlman
Sandia National Laboratories
Anke Schneider
Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit
Washington, DC
September 7-9, 2016
Outline
 Geologic/Hydrologic Background
 2016 progress
 SNL
 GRS
 Summary of issues
 Goals moving forward
2
WIPP Hydrogeology
 Repository in Salado
bedded salt formation
 >500-m thick salt unit
 Hydrogeology of
formations above salt
 Rustler Formation
 Culebra dolomite
 Magenta dolomite
 Anhydrite
 Mudstone/Halite
 Dewey Lake Red Beds
 Silt/sand stones + clay
 Dockum Group
 Silt/sand stones + clay
3
Rustler Conceptual Model
4
West
(Nash Draw)
East  West of WIPP
 Shallow units
 High permeability
 Relatively fresh water
 East of WIPP
 Deeper units
 Low permeability
 Saturated brine
 Regional groundwater
 Flow used in WIPP PA
 Long-term geological
stability of salt
Corbet (2000) WIPP Model
5
 Most of Delaware Basin
 Transient Simulation
 Climate variation (dry vs. wet)
 14,000 y → present → 10,000 y
 Model Implementation
 “water table” moving boundary
model
 ~8700 km2 region (78 km × 112 km)
 Coarse mesh (2 km square cells)
 12 model layers (10 geo layers)
 1,500 cells/layer
 ~18,000 elements total
Motivation
6
 Benchmark against existing solution (Corbet, 2000)
 Comparison with original model
 Old mesh, model parameters & boundary conditions
 Include new processes, features & data
 Include density-driven flow (e.g., Davies, 1989)
 Include chemistry & mineral dissolution
 Investigate flow & chemistry boundary conditions
 Test and update hydrogeological conceptual model
 Incoporate current data: 81Kr GW age data, water level data
 Comparison and Development of Models
 PFLOTRAN (SNL)
 Add density dependent flow
 d3f (GRS)
SNL Progress in 2016
7
SNL PFLOTRAN version
8
Corbet (2000): Hydraulic conductivity [m/s]
PFLOTRAN: Permeability [m2
]
SNL PFLOTRAN version
9~25x vertical exaggeration
SNL PFLOTRAN version
10Original Mesh: 13-layer hexahedral (cuboid) elements (18,000 elements)
100x vertical exaggeration
SNL PFLOTRAN model
11
Without density dependence or chemistry
SNL PFLOTRAN model
12
GRS Progress in 2016
13
 SNL: data of „basin-scale“
groundwater model after
Corbet & Knupp 1996
 raster data of 10
hydrogelogic units
Basin-scale model → d³f++
d³f++
source:
SNL, SECOFL3D
d³f++ model
Dewey Lake/Triassic
Anhydrite 5
Mudstone/Halite 4
Anhydrite 4
Magenta Dolomite
Anhydrite 3
Mudstone/Halite 3
Anhydrite 2
Culebra Dolomite
Los Medanos Member
110 km
≈ 500 mN
≈ 6,000 km²
d³f++ model
Dewey Lake/Triassic
Anhydrite 5
Mudstone/Halite 4
Anhydrite 4
Magenta Dolomite
Anhydrite 3
Mudstone/Halite 3
Anhydrite 2
Culebra Dolomite
Los Medanos Member
110 km
≈ 500 mN
≈ 6,000 km²
 anisotropic grid refinement
 adapt multigrid operators
d³f++ prism grid
N source: Corbet 2000
last year: 2,614,000 tetrahedrons („coarse“ grid)
now: 54,228 prisms (coarse grid)  18,000 hexahedrons SECOFL3D
Dewey Lake/Triassic
Anhydrite 5
Mudstone/Halite 4
Anhydrite 4
Magenta Dolomite
Anhydrite 3
Mudstone/Halite 3
Anhydrite 2
Culebra Dolomite
Los Medanos Member
Free Water Table – levelset method
18
 model domain D (const.)
 phreatic surface represented by a levelset function


partially saturated zone (not solved here)
fully saturated zone (Darcy’s law)
groundwater table (moving boundary)
Ω(t)
Γ(t)DΩ(t)
D
P. Frolkovič: Application of level set method for groundwater
flow with moving boundary, Adv. Wat. Res. 2012
0),()(  txtΓx 
),( tx
Γ(t)γ,Φ(γ),Φ(x)||||  01 signed distance function
Free Water Table – levelset method
19
 model domain D (const.)
 phreatic surface represented by a levelset function


partially saturated zone (not solved here)
fully saturated zone (Darcy’s law)
groundwater table (moving boundary)
Ω(t)
Γ(t)DΩ(t)
D
P. Frolkovič: Application of level set method for groundwater
flow with moving boundary, Adv. Wat. Res. 2012
0),()(  txtΓx 
),( tx
Γ(t)γ,Φ(γ),Φ(x)||||  01 signed distance function
 ),(),(),(,),()(:)( tqtuwithtΓtuNS


Initial & Boundary Conditions
N
c=1
(saturated brine)
recharge 2.0 – 0.1 mm/year, c=0 / seepage
initial condition:
water table
14,000 years ago
source:
Corbet &Knupp 1996
closed boundaries
salt concentration
d³f++ 2016 Simulations
density-driven flow, free water table
grid level 1 (217 000 prisms) and level 2 (900 000 prisms)
velocity
water table
d³f++ 2016
 Current work:
 new BMWi-funded project GRUSS (April 2016)
 improve robustness of solvers (convergence, timesteps)
 implement volume of fluid (VOF) method to speed-up free
surface handling
Summary of Issues / Path Forward
23
Issues Encountered
24
 Old Mesh is very coarse
 PFLOTRAN and d3f have difficulty with mesh
 Mesh violates conventions regarding
 Connectivity (must build mesh “by hand”)
 Aspect ratio (2 km × 2 km × 1s-100s m)
 Anke (GRS): re-mesh using modern tools
 Kris (SNL): struggle with old mesh
 Too coarse for:
 Solute transport calculations
 Density dependent flow
 High permeability contrast (8 orders of magnitude)
 Level-Set Method for water table ≠ Richards equation
 Unsaturated flow parameters are guessed
 Recharge applied at water table vs. applied at land surface
 Water table over large area (6,000 km2)
Schedule
25
 SECOFL3D data provided by SNL
 GRS begins building d3f model
 SNL begins building PFLOTRAN model
 SNL consults
 GRS builds d3f model equivalent to Corbet (2000)
 SNL builds PFLOTRAN equivalent to Corbet (2000)
 GRS ‘includes’ density-driven flow
 SNL includes density-driven flow to PFLOTRAN
 Including new features / data
 Update boundary conditions
 Update hydrological implementation and conceptual model
 Include geochemical tracers
Year1Year2Yearn

27 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v2

  • 1.
    Sandia National Laboratoriesis a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND2016-8647 C Basin-scale Density-dependent Groundwater flow Near a Salt Repository Kristopher L. Kuhlman Sandia National Laboratories Anke Schneider Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit Washington, DC September 7-9, 2016
  • 2.
    Outline  Geologic/Hydrologic Background 2016 progress  SNL  GRS  Summary of issues  Goals moving forward 2
  • 3.
    WIPP Hydrogeology  Repositoryin Salado bedded salt formation  >500-m thick salt unit  Hydrogeology of formations above salt  Rustler Formation  Culebra dolomite  Magenta dolomite  Anhydrite  Mudstone/Halite  Dewey Lake Red Beds  Silt/sand stones + clay  Dockum Group  Silt/sand stones + clay 3
  • 4.
    Rustler Conceptual Model 4 West (NashDraw) East  West of WIPP  Shallow units  High permeability  Relatively fresh water  East of WIPP  Deeper units  Low permeability  Saturated brine  Regional groundwater  Flow used in WIPP PA  Long-term geological stability of salt
  • 5.
    Corbet (2000) WIPPModel 5  Most of Delaware Basin  Transient Simulation  Climate variation (dry vs. wet)  14,000 y → present → 10,000 y  Model Implementation  “water table” moving boundary model  ~8700 km2 region (78 km × 112 km)  Coarse mesh (2 km square cells)  12 model layers (10 geo layers)  1,500 cells/layer  ~18,000 elements total
  • 6.
    Motivation 6  Benchmark againstexisting solution (Corbet, 2000)  Comparison with original model  Old mesh, model parameters & boundary conditions  Include new processes, features & data  Include density-driven flow (e.g., Davies, 1989)  Include chemistry & mineral dissolution  Investigate flow & chemistry boundary conditions  Test and update hydrogeological conceptual model  Incoporate current data: 81Kr GW age data, water level data  Comparison and Development of Models  PFLOTRAN (SNL)  Add density dependent flow  d3f (GRS)
  • 7.
  • 8.
    SNL PFLOTRAN version 8 Corbet(2000): Hydraulic conductivity [m/s] PFLOTRAN: Permeability [m2 ]
  • 9.
    SNL PFLOTRAN version 9~25xvertical exaggeration
  • 10.
    SNL PFLOTRAN version 10OriginalMesh: 13-layer hexahedral (cuboid) elements (18,000 elements) 100x vertical exaggeration
  • 11.
    SNL PFLOTRAN model 11 Withoutdensity dependence or chemistry
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
     SNL: dataof „basin-scale“ groundwater model after Corbet & Knupp 1996  raster data of 10 hydrogelogic units Basin-scale model → d³f++ d³f++ source: SNL, SECOFL3D
  • 15.
    d³f++ model Dewey Lake/Triassic Anhydrite5 Mudstone/Halite 4 Anhydrite 4 Magenta Dolomite Anhydrite 3 Mudstone/Halite 3 Anhydrite 2 Culebra Dolomite Los Medanos Member 110 km ≈ 500 mN ≈ 6,000 km²
  • 16.
    d³f++ model Dewey Lake/Triassic Anhydrite5 Mudstone/Halite 4 Anhydrite 4 Magenta Dolomite Anhydrite 3 Mudstone/Halite 3 Anhydrite 2 Culebra Dolomite Los Medanos Member 110 km ≈ 500 mN ≈ 6,000 km²  anisotropic grid refinement  adapt multigrid operators
  • 17.
    d³f++ prism grid Nsource: Corbet 2000 last year: 2,614,000 tetrahedrons („coarse“ grid) now: 54,228 prisms (coarse grid)  18,000 hexahedrons SECOFL3D Dewey Lake/Triassic Anhydrite 5 Mudstone/Halite 4 Anhydrite 4 Magenta Dolomite Anhydrite 3 Mudstone/Halite 3 Anhydrite 2 Culebra Dolomite Los Medanos Member
  • 18.
    Free Water Table– levelset method 18  model domain D (const.)  phreatic surface represented by a levelset function   partially saturated zone (not solved here) fully saturated zone (Darcy’s law) groundwater table (moving boundary) Ω(t) Γ(t)DΩ(t) D P. Frolkovič: Application of level set method for groundwater flow with moving boundary, Adv. Wat. Res. 2012 0),()(  txtΓx  ),( tx Γ(t)γ,Φ(γ),Φ(x)||||  01 signed distance function
  • 19.
    Free Water Table– levelset method 19  model domain D (const.)  phreatic surface represented by a levelset function   partially saturated zone (not solved here) fully saturated zone (Darcy’s law) groundwater table (moving boundary) Ω(t) Γ(t)DΩ(t) D P. Frolkovič: Application of level set method for groundwater flow with moving boundary, Adv. Wat. Res. 2012 0),()(  txtΓx  ),( tx Γ(t)γ,Φ(γ),Φ(x)||||  01 signed distance function  ),(),(),(,),()(:)( tqtuwithtΓtuNS  
  • 20.
    Initial & BoundaryConditions N c=1 (saturated brine) recharge 2.0 – 0.1 mm/year, c=0 / seepage initial condition: water table 14,000 years ago source: Corbet &Knupp 1996 closed boundaries
  • 21.
    salt concentration d³f++ 2016Simulations density-driven flow, free water table grid level 1 (217 000 prisms) and level 2 (900 000 prisms) velocity water table
  • 22.
    d³f++ 2016  Currentwork:  new BMWi-funded project GRUSS (April 2016)  improve robustness of solvers (convergence, timesteps)  implement volume of fluid (VOF) method to speed-up free surface handling
  • 23.
    Summary of Issues/ Path Forward 23
  • 24.
    Issues Encountered 24  OldMesh is very coarse  PFLOTRAN and d3f have difficulty with mesh  Mesh violates conventions regarding  Connectivity (must build mesh “by hand”)  Aspect ratio (2 km × 2 km × 1s-100s m)  Anke (GRS): re-mesh using modern tools  Kris (SNL): struggle with old mesh  Too coarse for:  Solute transport calculations  Density dependent flow  High permeability contrast (8 orders of magnitude)  Level-Set Method for water table ≠ Richards equation  Unsaturated flow parameters are guessed  Recharge applied at water table vs. applied at land surface  Water table over large area (6,000 km2)
  • 25.
    Schedule 25  SECOFL3D dataprovided by SNL  GRS begins building d3f model  SNL begins building PFLOTRAN model  SNL consults  GRS builds d3f model equivalent to Corbet (2000)  SNL builds PFLOTRAN equivalent to Corbet (2000)  GRS ‘includes’ density-driven flow  SNL includes density-driven flow to PFLOTRAN  Including new features / data  Update boundary conditions  Update hydrological implementation and conceptual model  Include geochemical tracers Year1Year2Yearn

Editor's Notes

  • #2 1
  • #19 effective flow velocity / groundwater distance velocity
  • #20 effective flow velocity / groundwater distance velocity