7. evaluation(4)

7. evaluation(4)

• 1.
  EVALUATION H A RR Y . T. D O C W R A
• 2.
  PRODUCTION PROCESS EVALUATION
• 3.
  RESEARCH • I considereddoing a radio podcast on upcoming films but I decided to do a podcast on photography. So for research I looked at other photography podcasts on YouTube from 2018. This helped give me an idea on what to do for the product. From it I got the idea to do the podcast in a mixed sort of way in terms of tone. Slightly humorous but happening in a mature scenario trying to be serious. (This was tone was completely original and not inspired by the existing products). Research helped me get an idea about what I wanted to make the podcast about and what topics to discuss. The problem with doing this amount of research is it takes a while and resources can be hard to find and you might not know what to look for. But research for products is highly recommended so you have an idea of what to do for your product. I am very happy with my final product.
• 4.
  PLANNING • For planningwe made spider diagrams to help us decide what we could do. I made 3 spider diagrams to help me decide. One was doing a photography podcast which is what I went with in the end. One focussed on the idea of doing a podcast about upcoming movies such as superhero movies, action movies, horror, sci-fi, etc. The other one was a podcast on music, where I would have played and talked about classic songs, new songs and my personal favourites. Planning helped me figure out what I wanted to do and understand the topics to talk about. But one of its weaknesses is it can take time whilst you can be doing the actual product. I feel like a could have done more diagrams to help expand my thoughts and get more ideas and probably done something else for the final product. I also feel like doing a movie podcast would have been more easier but I wanted to challenge myself.
• 5.
  TIME MANAGEMENT • Imanaged my time reasonably. I had to make some extra time to finish work but I managed to get it done in time. I feel like my product might have been improved if my time was extended. If I had more time to do it I would have fixed some sound editing problems to make it sound better. I was against a clock for most of the time and was having trouble finishing before the end of the lesson. But my time was extended and I managed to finish my project in time for it to be handed in.
• 6.
  TECHNICAL QUALITIES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9j8Xf1 Bi4o8 Similarities: Both discussare based on photography. Both discuss similar topics. Differences: One is a video, the other is just audio. One has just one host, the other has two.
• 7.
  AURAL QUALITIES • Ibelieve my work sounds at least mildly decent and I like the music that is played over certain parts of the dialogue and I thought the ending was funny. I tried to make it as creative as I could which worked in some parts. I would like to improve the editing to make it sound better and add more music to certain parts to make it sound brighter and more creative.
• 8.
  AUDIENCE APPEAL I feelI have appealed to my target audience by discussing mature and sophisticated topics, such as lenses, filters and angles. The dialogue is very mature as well and has a very adult feel to it in the way the topics are discussed. They sound complicated and to those who are not matured enough to understand.
• 9.
  PEER FEEDBACK
• 10.
  FEEDBACK 1 DANNY •What did you like about the product? – The music that was used underneath the background was upbeat and cool. The sound effects that were used were great such as the news report at the start. The information that was talked about was interesting and made me want to know more. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – The comedy bit didn’t suit the radio. It would have been better if it didn’t have any swearing or shouting. The length of the radio should have been longer.
• 11.
  FEEDBACK 2 SAM •What did you like about the product? – I liked the information that was given about photography. This was clearly a well made script. It suited the target audience which was 18+. The music that was played underneath the dialogue was ok. • What improvements could have been made to the product? -The comedy part wasn’t needed and ruined the radio
• 12.
  FEEDBACK 3 HARRIET •What did you like about the product? – I liked the comedy part in the radio. It was a little funny sketch which made the radio fun. The sound effects that were used were also great. The transitions suited the tone of the radio. • What improvements could have been made to the product? – The information was boring and tedious. Nothing was interesting to me about photography.
• 13.
  PEER FEEDBACK SUMMARY •What do you agree with from your peer feedback? – I agree that the ending felt out of place and it could have been longer. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? – That the information about the topics was boring and uninteresting.
• 14.
  PEER FEEDBACK SUMMARY Iwould have changed the ending to make it more serious and less out of place. I would find away to make the ending funny without the swearing.