7. evaluation(4)

7. evaluation(4)

• 1.
  FMP Evaluation Your name
• 2.
  Production Process Evaluation
• 3.
  Research • The mainstrengths of my research is that I had a lot of ideas to try and base my podcast off, this was very good for me because I struggled with ideas to do so these podcasts other people have done have inspired my work from top to bottom, I haven't copied in any shape of form. • It also helped influence how I layered my text and intro and outro, because I realised that I needed to match the sound effects to the mood of the speech. • Some main weaknesses in my work included the limitations there is to create a podcast. I struggled finding very good podcasts that had the same ideas as me and this was difficult because I couldn’t find inspiration right away, I had to burn time to find some good ones then to trite about them which took up a lot of time and this section is particularly long
• 4.
  Planning • Some strongpoints in my planning was obviously the planning, the planning helped me to get ideas down on what I could I could possibly create. This took some time but it was all for the right reasons. It took more time to plan than anything else in all my work because I decided to pit some time in to get the ideas down to then quickly create something that was good. This is a good work method because if you put in the time at the start you will see the results you get out of it. • Some major weak points planning was the trying to create ideas from the research. This was hard because I was trying to create ideas from what I have heard from other peoples podcasts so it was very hard to not accidently copy there ideas into mine. However I managed to do it but it took some time to get good ideas. Things I could greatly improve on is how I plan, I seem to get loads of ideas but sometimes they don’t fit or make sense with what I am trying to create, so I should in future have a few good ideas but with lots of details explaining them.
• 5.
  Time Management • Mytime management was ok but I could of improved certain sections, some sections that was really good where the planning, research, these sections went really well when I was working on them. Some sections that didn’t go as well was the production reflection and initial plans, these didn’t go to well because I spent way to much time on initial plans but I did get lots of ideas down which I what I was looking for but just cut my time short. And production reflection didn’t go good as well because I spent to little on this section, even though it is not a long section I feel l could’ve added a lot more detail into this bit. • One thing I would’ve done to get more time is to plan how long I want to work on my sections, then when I have done every thing go back over them and improve them if I have more time.
• 6.
  Technical Qualities • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpE_vEzZYD0 •The tech podcast • In my podcast there was some similar things to look at like the sound effects at the start this hyped it up a bit but mine wasn’t as hype as the true Geordie podcast. We both had questions to answer in our podcasts which is good because you always want to be asking different questions to keep the audience entertained. Some major differences there it is that there podcast is much longer and more of a relaxed type podcast unlike mine where it is I am getting interviewed. But also that there is three people in there and two in mine.
• 7.
  Aural Qualities • Mywork does not sound the best but I am happy with what I have created so far, the voices I feel are a little to quite, this can be a big issue if some people have hearing problems but apart from that I am happy with it. I feel like it could’ve been a bit more creative like adding more sound effects that where funny or just maybe more in general. Some main aspects that I like the most is the speech or the script, this worked really well and feel like that is what made most of that podcast. Some things that I would improve is the sound effects this is because I feel like this is one aspect that makes the podcast interesting and if these aren’t interesting then what are people going to think. The way I would improve this is by looking for more better sound effects on other websites. This way I can get a better view of what websites I should use for the future. This could make the overall sound of my product better.
• 8.
  Audience Appeal The waythat I have appealed to my target audience is by trying to make the podcast very serious but with also funny sections in there, this should hopefully be ok for them because who doesn’t like humour. The main bits that would appeal to my audience is the factual bits, this is because they want to listen to this stuff so they will enjoy them bits the most. The main bits they are looking out for is the advice for new people and what you can use drones for, all this is in the interview podcast. They wont particularity pay much attention to the intro and outro. Nor the sound effects. The dialogue in my work is very good in my eyes and ears and is something that the listeners will be listening out for because like I have said before they want to catch the most important features in this podcast and they know this wont happen again. So they will be definitely listening out for that key information.
• 9.
  Peer Feedback
• 10.
  Feedback 1 • Whatdid you like about the product? – I enjoyed the vibrant sound effects used for the opening and ending of the audio – I also enjoyed the use of humour at the end to keep it from being monotonus and dull • What improvements could have been made to the product? If I had to change anything it would be re recording certain lines to make sure there weren’t any stuttering and grammatical mistakes.
• 11.
  Feedback 2 • Whatdid you like about the product? • I liked the sound effects at the start • The dialogue was very good and the last bit was well worked to make it funny • What improvements could have been made to the product? You could some more sound effects to make it more interesting and detailed
• 12.
  Feedback 3 • Whatdid you like about the product? • the main thing I liked about this product was the script, the script was very good and worked well with the setting and story. • • What improvements could have been made to the product? A thing that I would improve is the quality of the sound effects and how many there are. Also the volume of the dialogue
• 13.
  Peer Feedback Summary •What do you agree with from your peer feedback? – The things that I agree on is that I could’ve added a lot more sound effects, this could increase the detail in my work. • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? The thing that I disagree on is the quality and make sure no one was stuttering. Every body makes mistakes and we cant stop the stuttering but I think the quality is very good.
• 14.
  Peer Feedback Summary Themain thing that’s that I would change in my work would be the amount of sound effects that I put in my work, this will make it more interesting from what I have heard from people who have listened to it. This could also make it sound better because who doesn’t like a good sound effect, another thing that I would change based upon my feedback is maybe the quality and volume of the audio, some people say the quality and volume of the sound effects and dialogue is too loud and too quiet, the dialogue being the one too quite and sound effects being to loud, I would most probably change that around so the dialogue was the loudest thing because if people cant hear what is being said then how are they meant o get any ideas and information from this interview podcast.