A brief history of Indo-Greeks In India with special reference to Demetrius and Menander
The document discusses the Indo-Greeks, a group of Bactrian Greeks who established a kingdom in parts of modern-day Afghanistan, Pakistan, and northwestern India during the Hellenistic period. Key figures include Diodotus I, who initiated the kingdom, and Menander I, recognized for his contributions to Buddhism and cultural exchanges. The decline of Indo-Greeks is attributed to conflicts with nomadic peoples and internal strife, alongside their lasting influence on Indian culture and numismatics.
Who are IndoGreeks?
• Bactria = northern part of modern Afghanistan.
• The Greeks of Bactria = satraps of the Seleucid Empire of West Asia.
• Mid-3rd cent BCE: Diodotus I revolted against Seleucid king Antiochous II = king
of Syria
• Established an independent Greek kingdom.
• Only those Bactrian Greeks who ruled over parts of NW India between the 2nd
century BCE and the early 1st century CE = Indo-Greeks or Indo-Bactrians.
5.
The Yavana problem
•Indo-Greeks = Those Bactrian Greeks who included north-west India in their domain.
• Indian sources refer to them as Yavanas.
• This term makes no distinction between Hellenic Greeks & Hellenistic Greeks.
• Hellenic Greeks = living on the mainland of the peninsula of Greece
• Hellenistic Greeks = of Greek descent or of mixed descent, but broadly conforming to
Greek culture and living in the eastern Mediterranean and west Asia.
• Indians more familiar with Hellenistic Greeks than with the Greeks of the peninsula.
• The term Yavana continued to be used in later times for all those who came from west
Asia.
6.
Indo Greek kingdom
•The term "Indo-Greek Kingdom" loosely describes a number of various
Hellenistic states, ruling from regional capitals like Taxila, Sagala, Pushkalavati,
and Alexandria in the Caucasus (now Bagram).
• The Indo-Greek Kingdom = covering various parts of modern-day Afghanistan,
Pakistan and northwestern India.
• The kingdom was founded when the Graeco-Bactrian king Demetrius I of
Bactria invaded India from Bactria in about 200 BCE.
7.
Sources
• The historyof the Indo-Greeks has been reconstructed mainly on the
evidence of their coins besides few relic casket inscriptions.
• Bilingual.
• Die struck
• Fixed Obverse Reverse.
• Monogram
• Coins, Joint coins, Commemorative coins.
Backdrop: Formation ofIndo
Greek Kingdom
• 250 BCE: Antiochous II = king of Syria.
• Diodotus = governor of Antiochus II in Bactria.
• Diodotus revolted and became the new king.
• 248 BCE: Diodotus II
• 235 BCE: Euthydemus: Established a new dynasty.
• Battle between Antiochus III & Euthydemus.
• Treaty: Antiochus III’s daughter married the son of
Euthydemus-Demetrius.
22.
Demetrius I (200-190BCE?)
•Son of Euthydemos and son-in law of Antiochos the Great.
• Identified by some with king Dattamitra in Mahabharata.
• Took his armies to the SE of the Hindu Kush where he
successfully acquired territory.
• Came to rule a large area in southern Afghanistan, the
Punjab and the Indus Valley, thus establishing Indo-Greek
power in north-western India.
• Wide extent of his conquests: Existence of several cities
named after him/his father in Afghanistan & India.
23.
Demetrius II (175-170BCE)
•A.K.Narain: Demetrius II = S/O or grandson of
Demetrius I.
• Issued coins with Greek & Kharoshthi scripts.
• His coins recovered from Taxila.
• His generals: Menander & Apollodotus
24.
Conquests
• Forays intothe Ganges heartland, but the power base remained the north-
west and possibly the Punjab.
• Strabo: Greek invaders after Alexander reached till Ganga and Patiliputra.
• S.Konow: Hathigumpha inscription refers to Yawanraj Dimit fleeing Pataliputra.
• Mahabhashya: Yavana raids in the western Ganges Plain and in Rajasthan.
• Justin: Demetrius = king of India.
• Bhandarkar: read a sealing from Vidisha as belonging to Demetrius.
25.
Greek Invasion: Theevent
• Patanjali: अरुणद् यवनः साक
े तम्, अरुणद् यवनों माध्यममकाम्
• A certain Yavana had besieged Saketa (Ayodhya) and place called Madhyamika
(Chittor).
• Malavikagnimitram: refers to a conflict between the Sunga prince Vasumitra & a
Yavana on the southern bank of the Sindhu.
• Yuga Purana of Gargi samhita: Then, after having approached Saket together with the
Panchalas and the Mathuras, the Yavanas, valiant in battle, will reach Kusumadhvaja
(Pataliputra).
26.
Greek Invasion: Theinvader
• Mahabhashya+ Malvikagnimitram: The
name of the invader is not given.
• Considerable divergence of opinion with
regard to his identity.
• But all agree that he was a Bactrian Greek:
Either Menander or Demetrius.
• Smith + Rapson: invader = Menander
• Bhandarkar + Raichaudhary + Jayaswal:
invader was Demetrios.
27.
Number of Greekattacks
One/Joint attack:
Tarn , A.K.Narain
1. Demetrius &
Menander
• Demetrius reached
Patiliputra after
wining Madhyamika.
• Menander reached
there after defeating
Mathura, Panchal,
Saket.
• 2. Menander: Narain
Two attacks:
N.N.Gosh
1. Menander.
• One as army
commander of
Demetrius.
• Second as king of
Sialkot.
Three attacks
1. Demetrius + his
commander
Menander.
2. Menander as king.
3. Others after the
death of Menander
28.
Demetrius II &Eucratides
• Eucratides (commander of army of king of Syria) invaded Bactria.
• Justin: Demetrius surrounded 300 soldiers of Eucratides with 60,000 soldiers.
• Still Demetrius lost: 167 BCE.
• Coins of Eucratides recovered from Kapisha and Gandhar.
• Justin: Demetrios was deprived of his Indian possessions by Eukratides.
29.
Two branches ofIndo Greeks
• Euthydemus branch
• Demertius
• Menander
• Apollodotos, Pantaleon, Agathokles,
Agathokleia, Stratos
• Eucratides branch
• Heliokles
• Hermeas
• Literary and numismatic evidence: existence of two rival Greek kingdoms in India and their
mutual dissensions.
• Eucratides branch vs Euthydemus branch (Demetrius).
• Double succession, one derived from Demetrios holding Sakala (Sialkot) with a considerable
portion of the Indian interior, the other derived from Eukratides.
30.
Menander (c. 150to 135 BCE)
• The best remembered of the Indo-Greek king.
• Identified with the king Milinda mentioned in the Milindapanho.
• Stabilized Indo-Greek power, in addition to extending its frontiers in India.
31.
Conquests
• The extentof his conquest: indicated by the great variety & wide diffusion of his coins
over a very wide extent of country, as far west as Kabul, and as far east as Mathura.
• Known to have held Swat Valley & Hazara district as well as Punjab.
• Attacked Sungas in the Yamuna region, if not closer to Pataliputra itself.
• Conquered territory in the Ganges Plain, but failed to retain it.
• Periplus: small silver coins, inscribed with Greek characters and bearing the name of
Menander were still current in his time (cir. 60-80 CE) at the port of Barygaza (Broach).
• Capital at Sagala or Sakala, modern Siillkot, in Punjab.
32.
Invading India
One/Joint attack:
Tarn, A.K.Narain
1. Demetrius &
Menander
• Demetrius reached
Patiliputra after
wining Madhyamika.
• Menander reached
there after defeating
Mathura, Panchal,
Saket.
• 2. Menander: Narain
Two attacks:
N.N.Gosh
1. Menander.
• One as army
commander of
Demetrius.
• Second as king of
Sialkot.
Three attacks
1. Demetrius + his
commander
Menander.
2. Menander as king.
3. Others after the
death of Menander
33.
Menander and Buddhism
•A discussion on Buddhism between Menander and the Buddhist philosopher Nagasena is
claimed to have resulted in Menander's conversion to Buddhism.
• A fragmentary Kharoshthi inscription on a casket found at Bajaur in NWFP Pakistan: refers to
relics of the Buddha being enshrined (presumably in a stupa) during the reign of a king
named Minedra (= Menander?).
• His popularity gave rise to legends.
• Plutarch: Various cities of the north-west vied with each other for his ashes after his
cremation, then built monuments over the relics.
• Elephant depiction on his coins.
34.
Eucratides(170-145 BCE)
• Strabo:Eucratides didn’t cross Hydaspes.
• Bi-lingual coins from Kapisha, Taxila, western Punjab.
• Gandhar and Herat taken away by Menander.
• Strabo: Taking advantage on maladministration of
Eucratides, Parthian king attacked & snatched away parts of
his kingdom.
• In later days: Eucratides ruling over a small part of Bactria.
• Succeeded by his son Heliocles.
35.
Yavans in India
•Several depictions of Greeks in Central India
dated to the 2nd-1st century BCE are known.
• The Greek soldier in Bharhut.
• A frieze in Sanchi which describes Greek-
looking foreigners honoring the Sanchi stupa
with gifts, prayers and music.
• Heliodorus pillar inscription.
• Reh inscription: 350 km south-east of
Mathura mentions Menander.
36.
Pillar of theGreat Chaitya at
Karla Caves, Maharashtra
mentioning its donation by a
Yavana.
Below: detail of the word "Ya-
va-na-sa" in old Brahmi script:
, circa CE 120.
37.
Indo Greek signatures
•Marked their presence by monumental buildings & by small, finely crafted objects.
• Excavation of the cities of Ai-Khanoum, on the confluence of the Oxus and the
Kokcha and of Sirkap at Taxila reveals a characteristic talent for urban planning.
• Ai-Khanoum was built on the usual city-plan, the citadel differentiated from the lower
city with predictable features such as temples, theatres, buildings embellished with
pillars and patterned mosaic floors.
• Coins excellent examples of minting, with portraiture of a high aesthetic quality.
38.
Indian hostility forYavanas
• Brahman author of the Yugapurana section of the Gargi Samhita: hostile to the Yavanas who are
said to behave in a brutal and inhuman manner.
• Demonizing of the Yavanas = curious, since they were familiar from Mauryan times.
• The source of irritation: much of the patronage of Indo greeks went to the Buddhists.
• Vedic Brahmanism by the very nature of its belief & practice: closed for the Yavanas.
• Puranas: There will be Yavanas here by reason of ambition or plunder ; they will not be kings
solemnly anointed but will follow evil customs by reason of the corruptions of the age.
Massacring women and children and killing one another, kings will enjoy the earth at the end of
the Kali age.
39.
Decline of IndoGreeks
Puranas: The fiercely fighting Greeks will not stay in the Madhya there will be a cruel, dreadful
war in their own kingdom, caused between themselves.
Justin: " Bactrians harassed by various wars lost not only their dominions but their liberty ; for
having suffered from contentions with the Sogdians, the Drangians and the Indians they were
at last overcome as if exhausted by the weaker Parthians.
Romila Thapar: The decline of the Greek kingdoms in the north-west coincided with an attack
on Bactria itself by nomadic peoples from central Asia- Parthians and the Scythians - referred
to as the Pahlavas and Shakas in Indian sources.
End: Rise of Sakas-Pahalavas + struggles with Euthydemus branch.
• Last known king = Hermeas.
40.
Influence of IndoGreeks
• Astrology:
1. Gargi Samhita- Yavan malechchha are well versed in astrology & hence are to be revered like
sages.
2. Varahamihira: Yavanas are Malechchha but they are scholars of Jyotish.
3. Division of week into 7 days, Greek calender, names of planets.
• Medicinal science: Vogel- Charak rules for conduct of doctors inspired by Indo Greeks.
• Gandhar art: Greek influence.
• Coinage: introduced innovations in Indian numismatics- die-striking, the use of legends,
portraits of rulers, monograms and the representation of deities.
41.
Influence
• Religion &philosophy:
1.Besnagar pillar inscription erected by a Heliodorus, envoy of King
Antialkidas of Taxila to the King of Besnagar, perhaps one of the later Shungas.
He professes to be a follower of Vasudeva and obviously, though Greek, had
become a Vaishnava.
2. Menander’s interest in Buddhism.
• Literature: acculturation of language + Sanskrit Drama?
42.
Remarks
• V.A. Smith& W.W.Tarn: No question of Greek influence.
• Attacks of Indo Greeks were just momentary flickers.
• Didn’t leave any impact on Indian culture.
• Jha & Shrimali: Indians may have been impressed by the warrior kings
like Menander but did not look upon them to be followed.