Causal Response Filtering
(CRF)
An Integrated Framework for
Vacuum Energy and Gravity
Motivation
• QFT on curved spacetime predicts
enormous vacuum energy contributions.
• Standard renormalization absorbs
divergences into local counterterms.
• Problem: Why do these local terms not
gravitate dynamically?
• CRF: Only causal, state-dependent parts
of the effective action source geometry.
CTP Effective Action and Filtering
• CTP splits effective action into local and
nonlocal parts.
• Local terms → absorbed as constants
(integration constants).
• Nonlocal retarded kernels → dynamical
backreaction.
• Auxiliary constraint ensures only causal
response enters Einstein equations.
Physical Justification
• Equivalence principle: constant energy is
locally unobservable.
• Thermodynamic analogy: only retarded
response governs macroscopic dynamics.
• Operator structure: commutators drive
causal response.
Worked Examples
• Minkowski: quartic divergences demoted;
running couplings preserved.
• FRW cosmology: removes threshold
jumps; predicts global constant C.
• Black holes: exterior GR intact; possible
interior softening (no echoes).
Testable Predictions
• No threshold kinks in H(z).
• Small nonlocal corrections to growth and
slip (≈ 10^-4 on horizon scales).
• Casimir energy gravitates normally with E/
c^2.
• No black-hole echoes; exterior
Schwarzschild/Kerr unchanged.
Comparisons with Other Frameworks
• Unimodular gravity: cosmological constant
as integration constant; CRF generalizes to
all local terms.
• Vacuum sequestering: global variables/4-
forms; CRF embedded in CTP with causal
selection.
• Asymptotic safety / holography:
complementary consistency principle at low
energies.
Scope and Open Issues
• Rigorous in perturbative EFT;
nonperturbative effects remain to be
worked out.
• Origin of the auxiliary constraint (e.g., 4-
form/topological sector) needs clearer
derivation.
• Compute explicit retarded loop corrections
for cosmology (μ(k,a), η(k,a), ISW).
Conclusion
• CRF eliminates catastrophic vacuum
energy locally while preserving causal
backreaction.
• Framework is technically precise and
falsifiable.
• Clear observational targets: leakage
bounds, scale-dependent growth/slip,
Casimir gravitation, BH phenomenology.

A Causal Response Filter Presentation.pdf

  • 1.
    Causal Response Filtering (CRF) AnIntegrated Framework for Vacuum Energy and Gravity
  • 2.
    Motivation • QFT oncurved spacetime predicts enormous vacuum energy contributions. • Standard renormalization absorbs divergences into local counterterms. • Problem: Why do these local terms not gravitate dynamically? • CRF: Only causal, state-dependent parts of the effective action source geometry.
  • 3.
    CTP Effective Actionand Filtering • CTP splits effective action into local and nonlocal parts. • Local terms → absorbed as constants (integration constants). • Nonlocal retarded kernels → dynamical backreaction. • Auxiliary constraint ensures only causal response enters Einstein equations.
  • 4.
    Physical Justification • Equivalenceprinciple: constant energy is locally unobservable. • Thermodynamic analogy: only retarded response governs macroscopic dynamics. • Operator structure: commutators drive causal response.
  • 5.
    Worked Examples • Minkowski:quartic divergences demoted; running couplings preserved. • FRW cosmology: removes threshold jumps; predicts global constant C. • Black holes: exterior GR intact; possible interior softening (no echoes).
  • 6.
    Testable Predictions • Nothreshold kinks in H(z). • Small nonlocal corrections to growth and slip (≈ 10^-4 on horizon scales). • Casimir energy gravitates normally with E/ c^2. • No black-hole echoes; exterior Schwarzschild/Kerr unchanged.
  • 7.
    Comparisons with OtherFrameworks • Unimodular gravity: cosmological constant as integration constant; CRF generalizes to all local terms. • Vacuum sequestering: global variables/4- forms; CRF embedded in CTP with causal selection. • Asymptotic safety / holography: complementary consistency principle at low energies.
  • 8.
    Scope and OpenIssues • Rigorous in perturbative EFT; nonperturbative effects remain to be worked out. • Origin of the auxiliary constraint (e.g., 4- form/topological sector) needs clearer derivation. • Compute explicit retarded loop corrections for cosmology (μ(k,a), η(k,a), ISW).
  • 9.
    Conclusion • CRF eliminatescatastrophic vacuum energy locally while preserving causal backreaction. • Framework is technically precise and falsifiable. • Clear observational targets: leakage bounds, scale-dependent growth/slip, Casimir gravitation, BH phenomenology.